Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 25655

Original article / research
Table of Contents - Year : 2017 | Month : April | Volume : 11 | Issue : 4 | Page : LC22 - LC27

Flat Foot in a Random Population and its Impact on Quality of Life and Functionality LC22-LC27

Salvador Pita-fernandez, Cristina Gonzalez-martin, Francisco Alonso-tajes, Teresa Seoane-pillado, Sonia Pertega-diaz, Sergio Perez-garcia, Rocio Seijo-bestilleiro, Vanesa Balboa-barreiro

Correspondence
Dr. Salvador Pita-fernandez,
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), SERGAS, Universidade de A Coruña, As Xubias de Arriba, 84
15006 A Coruña, Spain.
E-mail: salvador.pita.fernandez@sergas.es

Introduction: Flat foot is a common deformity in adults. It is characterized by medial rotation and plantar flexion of the talus, eversion of the calcaneus, collapsed medial arch and abduction of the forefoot.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of flat foot and its impact on quality of life, dependence, foot pain, disability and functional limitation among random population of 40-year-old and above.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study in a random population sample from Cambre (A Coruña-Spain) (n=835) was performed (a =0.05; Precision=±3.4%). The diagnosis of flat foot was stablished by the study of the footprint obtained with a pedograph. Anthropometric variables were studied, Charlson’s Comorbidity Index, function and state of foot (Foot Function Index (FFI), Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ)), quality of life (SF-36), and dependence for activities of daily living (Barthel and Lawton index). A logistic and linear multiple regression analysis was performed.

Results: The prevalence of flat foot was 26.62%. Patients with flat foot were significantly older (65.73±11.04 vs 61.03±11.45- year-old), showed a higher comorbidity index (0.92±1.49 vs 0.50±0.98), had a greater BMI (31.45±5.55 vs 28.40±4.17) and greater foot size (25.16±1.66 vs 24.82±1.65). The presence of flat foot diminishes the quality of life, as measured by the FHSQ, and foot function, measured by the FFI. The presence of flat foot does not alter the physical and mental dimension of the SF-36 or the degree of dependence.

Conclusion: Flat foot was associated with age, Charlson’s Comorbidity Index, BMI and foot size. The SF-36, Barthel and Lawton questionnaires remained unaltered by the presence of flat foot. The FHSQ and FFI questionnaires did prove to be sensitive to the presence of flat foot in a significant manner.