Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 52914

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : GC06 - GC10 Full Version

Screening of High and Low-risk Human Papillomavirus Variants in Cervical Cancer Patients by Polymerase Chain Reaction: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69276.19319
Ritu Yadav, Lokesh Kadian, Smiti Nanda, Shalu Ranga, Parul Ahuja, Chetna Yadav, Preeti Chauhan

1. Associate Professor, Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Post Doctoral Fellow, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 3. Retired Head and Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 4. Research Scholar, Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 5. Research Scholar, Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 6. Research Scholar, Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 7. Associate Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Mohali, Chandigarh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ritu Yadav,
Associate Professor, Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak-124001, Haryana, India.
E-mail: yritu3757@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer is the second most common gynaecological malignancy worldwide. Persistent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the principal risk factor leading to cervical carcinogenesis and causes a large number of casualties.

Aim: To estimate the risk factors and symptoms related to cervical carcinoma and to check for mono-infection or co-infections of low-risk and high-risk HPVs in Northern Indian females.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2019 to January 2021 on 110 confirmed cervical cancer tissue samples collected from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Pandit BD Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. Information about risk factors and symptoms was collected using a semistructured proforma. Detection of HPV infection and HPV genotyping (16, 18, 33, 58, 6, and 11) was done by using type-specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Fisher’s exact test was applied to determine the association of high-risk HPV infection with other risk factors using GraphPad Prism Version 6 (La Jolla, California, USA). A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Of all the studied cases, 68 (62%) were above 55 years old, 67 (61%) were in a postmenopausal state, and 86 (78%) were from a rural background. Irregular menstruation was observed in 99 (90%) cases, bleeding after menopause in 59 (54%) cases, and early age at first intercourse in 57 (52%) cases were the most common symptoms. HPV infection was found in all cases of cervical carcinoma. The incidence of high-risk-HPV16 (84%) and HPV18 (73%) was the most prominent, while the incidence of low-risk-HPV6 (7.2%) and HPV11 (6%) was the lowest. Co-infection of HPV16/18 was the Highest in 60 (54.5%) cases, followed by HPV16/33 in 13 (11.8%) cases. Multi-infection of HPV types 16/18/33 was found in 10 (9.1%) cases, and multi-infection of HPV types 16/18/33/6/11, except HPV58, was found in one patient.

Conclusion: Higher age, postmenopausal status, early age at intercourse, and poor menstrual hygiene were significantly associated with high-risk HPV co-infection. Educating women about the risk factors and symptoms of cervical cancer and screening for high-risk HPVs in rural women are required to reduce the prevalence of cervical cancer in Northern India.

Keywords

Co-infection, Human papillomavirus genotyping, Mono-infection, Risk factors, Symptoms

Cervical cancer is the 3rd most common cancer in women worldwide. Among all gynaecological cancers, it ranks 2nd only after breast cancer and is the most manageable if diagnosed early (1). In developed countries, a decrease in cervical cancer incidence is observed with increased screening programs, but in developing countries, there is little or no awareness of screening programs, leading to a high incidence (2). In India, more than 123,000 women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, contributing 9.4% to all cancer cases, out of which 77,348 women died due to this disease in the year 2020. The major causes of the higher mortality rate of cervical cancer in India include the lack of awareness regarding its preventive measures, risk factors, and screening programs, unequal distribution of cancer care facilities, and the late presentation of symptoms (3),(4). Research studies involving cervical cancer have shown that the likelihood of developing cervical cancer increases with an increase in the number of sexual partners and at a younger age at sexual intercourse. Mostly middle-aged women (aged 40- 55 years) are affected by this cancer, especially those with Poor economic status who are unable to access regular health checkups due to the monetary issues. Poor hygiene and an imbalanced lifestyle also play important roles in causing this cancer (5),(6).

The relationship between cervical cancer and HPV is well established, and the association of HPV in cervical cancer is as high as the association of smoking in lung cancer (7). More than 100 types of HPV have been reported and classified as high-risk (16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58) and low-risk (6, 11, 42, 43, 70, and 90), which are responsible for causing cancer of the cervix uteri. Epidemiological studies suggest that more than 95% of cervical cancer cases worldwide are associated with HPV infection [8,9]. Molecular trials have identified that the two most prevalent extremely oncogenic HPV types observed in invasive cervical carcinoma are HPV16 and 18 (10). Co-infection and multiple HPV type infections are often related to the development of cervical cancer, but the prevalence of combinations of HPV genotypes is not well known. Some studies suggest that co-infection with HPV types increase the risk of cervical cancer, while multiple HPV infections decrease the survival rate by reducing the response to therapy. Therefore, co-infection or multiple infections are considered prominent risk factors that drive cervical carcinogenesis (11),(12). Studies on different HPV types and their specific co-infections in different populations are necessary to validate this. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this was the first study on the North Indian (Haryana) women population that aimed to estimate the risk factors and compare the status of high-risk as well as low-risk HPVs and their co-infection in tumour tissue of cervical cancer.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2019 to January 2021 on 110 confirmed cervical cancer tissue samples collected from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Pandit BD Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. Ethical permission for sample collection was obtained from the Institutional Human Ethical Committee (IHEC), Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India, with letter number IHEC 119/06 dated 15.01.2019. The subject of the study was verbally explained to the patients or their parents/guardians in the local language. Written information consent was obtained from all enrolled cases (educated) and their parents/guardians (illiterate).

Inclusion criteria: Pathologically confirmed cervical cancer cases were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a record of any other synchronous malignancy or who had received any therapy were excluded from the study.

Histological grading was assigned to samples based on the observed changes in cervical epithelium regarding histological types and disease progression (poor differentiation, moderate differentiation, and well differentiation) (13), and this information was recorded from the patient data sheet. Relevant parameters were noted in the performa from the medical records. Responses for some confidential factors could not be recorded due to patients’ denial.

Genomic DNA isolation: All the collected samples were stored immediately at -80°C and processed in a Biosafety Level II laminar flow hood in the Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India. For DNA isolation, tissues were crushed in liquid nitrogen resuspended in STE buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, and 1 mM EDTA), and incubated with 100 μg of proteinase K at 55°C for 16 h. The purity and concentration of genomic DNA were checked by a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (mySPEC, Sigma-SVi).

HPV genotyping in cervical biopsies: In the present study, HPV genotyping of high-risk HPV16, HPV18, HPV33, and HPV58 and low-risk HPV6 and HPV11 was carried out using PCR with specific primers shown in (Table/Fig 1). Patients found infected with one type of HPV were placed under the mono-infection category, and those with more than one type were placed under the co-infection category.

A total of 10 μL PCR mixture was prepared by mixing 10× PCR buffer, 2 mM dNTPs, 10 pmol of each forward and reverse primer, 100 ng DNA, Taq DNA Polymerase, and nuclease-free water. Reactions were performed as follows: Initial denaturation for four minutes at 94°C followed by 35 cycles with denaturation for 45 seconds at 94°C, primer annealing for 45 seconds at 53-61°C, extension for one minute at 72°C, and final extension for seven minutes at 72°C. The PCR products were analysed with gel electrophoresis using a 2% agarose gel stained with the EtBr dye and were seen under a UV transilluminator.

Parameters studied under the study: Risk factors and symptoms observed by the gynaecologist during the investigations, like age, residential background, educational status, age at intercourse, menopause, and menstrual hygiene, were studied. Symptoms like irregular menstruation, postmenopausal bleeding, vaginal odour, genital tract infection, bleeding during intercourse, white discharge, pelvic pain, and discomfort during urination were also noted.

Statistical Analysis

Responses to individual questions were documented, and the data were analysed using Microsoft Excel. The data are expressed in percentage frequencies calculated from the total number of enrolled cases of cervical cancer. Fisher’s exact test was applied to determine the association of high-risk HPV infection with other risk factors using GraphPad Prism Version 6 (La Jolla, California, USA). A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Cervical cancer cases were categorised into different age groups. The youngest patient was 28 years old, and the eldest was 82 years old. Most cases fell within the age group of 56-65 years. The mean age of the registered cases was 55.3, and the median was 56.5. A 68 (62%) patients were above 55 years old, while 42 (38%) were below 55 years old. The age at first intercourse in the studied subjects was less than 18 years in 57 (52%) cases. Many of the cases (67, 61%) were in their postmenopausal stage, and 72 (65%) were practicing poor menstrual hygiene. In this study, 93 (84.5%) women suffering from cervical cancer were illiterate or just literate, as most of them were from rural backgrounds (86, 78%), lacking access to education and other awareness systems at their time. Only 17 (15.5%) enrolled cancer cases had completed high school.

Histological grading: Out of the 110 enrolled cases, 106 (96%) belonged to squamous cell carcinoma, while 2 (2%) cases each of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma were observed in biopsies. Sixty-five (59%) cases were moderately differentiated, with 8 (7%) cases each classified as well and poorly differentiated. For 29 (26.3%) cases, no degree of differentiation was found.

Symptoms: The most common symptoms in enrolled cases were irregular menstruation (99, 90%), bleeding postmenopause (60, 54%), strong foul vaginal odour (52, 47%), genital tract infection (47, 43%), bleeding during intercourse (42, 38%), white discharge (39, 35%), pelvic pain (39, 35%), and discomfort during urination (11, 10%).

Human Papillomavirus (HPV): All 110 cancerous biopsies were found positive for HPV DNA.

Detection of High-risk HPVs in cervical cancer cases

Out of the 110 HPV-positive cervical cancer cases, 92 (84%) samples were found to be HPV16 positive, while 80 (73%) samples were found positive for HPV18 and 15 (14%) samples were found positive for HPV33 as shown in [Table/Fig-2a-c, 3a]. No sample was found to be infected with HPV58 type.

Detection of Low-risk HPVs in cervical cancer cases

Among the 110 HPV-positive cervical cancer cases, 8 (7.2%) samples were found to be HPV 6 positive, and 7 (6%) cases were found positive for HPV11 as shown in (Table/Fig 2)d,e,(Table/Fig 3)b.

Co-infection and multi-infection of High-risk HPVs and Low-risk HPVs in cervical cancer cases

The percentage of patients co-infected with different HPV types in cervical cancer patients is shown in (Table/Fig 4). Women had a higher prevalence of HPV16/18 co-infection (54.5%), followed by HPV16/33 co-infection (11.8%) and HPV18/33 co-infection (10.9%). Multi-infection of HPV types 16/18/33 was found in 9.1% of cases, and multi-infection of all HPV types except HPV58 was found in only one patient. Patients infected with high-risk HPV types were more prevalent compared to those infected with low-risk HPV types or co-infected with both (low- and high-risk HPV).

In the current study, the association of high-risk HPV co-infection was also examined with other risk factors. HPV co-infection of HPV16/18 was associated with higher age, younger age at intercourse, post-menopausal stage, and poor menstrual hygiene in women, while HPV16/33 and 18/33 co-infection were found to be statistically associated with the early age of intercourse in women as shown in (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

A very high prevalence of HPV infection was observed in all cases. Patients infected with high-risk HPVs were more numerous compared to those infected with low-risk HPVs or co-infected with both. Mono-infection of HPV16 was the most common, followed by the infection of HPV18. The incidence of HPV6 and HPV11 mono-infection was also found to be low in the present cervical cancer samples. Co-infection or multiple infections of HPV types may increase the development and progression of precancerous lesions compared to mono-infection. A recent epidemiological study indicates that around 50% of HPV-positive females were co-infected with more than one type of HPV (14). In another study, it was found that co-infections with low-risk HPV types increase the risk of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (15). The incidence of mono-infection and co-infection varies from area to area and country to country. In some areas, HPV mono-infection was more frequent than co-infection, while in other areas, a higher prevalence of co-infection was observed (16),(17),(18). In the women from the western Mexican population, the co-infections reported with a high prevalence were HPV51/52 and HPV16/51/52. Although single infections with these HPV genotypes were also commonly observed (19). In the present study, a higher incidence of HPV16/18 (54.5%) co-infection and lower incidence of HPV16/33 (11.8%) and HPV18/33 (10.9%) co-infection were found. Multi-infection of HPV16/18/33 was found in 9.1% of the cervical cancer cases. Co-infection of high-risk HPVs was statistically associated with higher age, early age at intercourse, postmenopausal status, and poor menstrual hygiene of the patients. These observations were similar to other related studies [20-22]. However, further details on HPV co-infection and multi-infection in association with cervical cancer are required to draw fruitful results.

More than 60% of the cases were above 55 years of age and in their postmenopausal stage, showing that the chances of cervical cancer increase with age, and postmenopausal women are at a higher risk of being affected. Most of the patients in this study population belonged to a rural background 86 (78%) and were illiterate (90%). The role of residential background and education comes into play when determining the incidence of cervical cancer, as people in rural areas and those who are illiterate are less aware of screening and preventive measures than the people in urban areas and educated individuals. The scenario is somewhat different for women in urban areas compared to rural areas, where a high level of awareness has been observed (23). A national representative survey conducted by Dikshit R et al., has also shown that cervical cancer incidence has decreased in women in urban areas due to an increased level of awareness (24). Previous studies have shown that women with an early age of intercourse and poor menstrual hygiene have a greater risk of carcinoma cervix (25),(26),(27). The present study also looked at these risk factors and found that 57 (52%) of the enrolled cases had their first intercourse before the age of 18 years, and 72 (65%) of the women were practicing poor menstrual hygiene by using the same cloth repeatedly to manage menstrual bleeding.

In one of the authors’ previous studies conducted on rural and urban populations, it was observed that irregular painful menstruation, smelly white discharge, pain, and bleeding during or after intercourse were the major symptoms in most cases (23). In the present study, irregular menstruation was observed as the most common symptom. Moreover, the participants had been experiencing these problems for a long time, but they were ignorant of the symptoms and felt ashamed to contact a medical advisor. If they were aware of the consequences of these symptoms in the future, they could be diagnosed early and provided with better treatment.

Vaccines targeting high-risk HPVs may prove beneficial in the timely eradication of cervical cancer. However, there is a need to find out whether vaccines designed for high-risk types can also cure infections of low-risk HPVs. The upcoming vaccines should be designed in ways that are effective against low-risk as well as the other most common genotypes of HPV.

Limitation(s)

Since the sample size for the present study was limited, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the role of underestimated HPV genotypes (in mono- or co-infection forms) in cervical cancer. Moreover, this study was conducted using the PCR method; further advanced techniques such as Real-Time PCR and Methylation-Specific PCR can be applied to unveil the underlying molecular mechanisms involving these HPV mono- and co-infections. Thirdly, as the control samples could not be accessed, future studies can be planned to compare the status of mono- and co-infections of different high-risk and low-risk HPV types in normal and cervical cancer patients.

Conclusion

In the present study, high-risk HPV infection was found to be more frequent than low-risk HPV infection, and co-infection of HPV16/18 was found to be high compared to other co-infections or multi-infections. Despite the high incidence of different HPV infections in women of Haryana, there is very little or no knowledge of HPV infection and its vaccination. Activities like the training nurses and local workers, holding seminars in rural schools and colleges, involving local panchayats and social workers like Anganwadi and ASHA workers, engaging women representatives, and educating dispensaries about cervical cancer will help in educating all women.

Acknowledgement

Authors want to extend their gratitude to the entire staff of Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak for supporting during the collection of samples and also thankful to all the participants who were enrolled in this study.

References

1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Bedell SL, Goldstein LS, Goldstein AR, Goldstein AT. Cervical cancer screening: Past, present, and future. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2020;8(1):28-37. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Bhat AH, Akram M. Patterns of cancer in India: A sociological exploration of globocan estimates. Resmilitaris. 2023;13(3):653-64.
4.
Sathishkumar K, Vinodh N, Badwe RA, Deo SV, Manoharan N, Malik R, et al. Trends in breast and cervical cancer in India under National Cancer Registry Programme: An age-period-cohort analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021;74:101982. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Kashyap N, Krishnan N, Kaur S, Ghai S. Risk factors of cervical cancer: A case-control study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019;6(3):308-14. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Zhang S, Xu H, Zhang L, Qiao Y. Cervical cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening. Chin J Cancer Res. 2020;32(6):720. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Wardak S. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2016;68(1):73-84.
8.
Olusola P, Banerjee HN, Philley JV, Dasgupta S. Human papilloma virus-associated cervical cancer and health disparities. Cells. 2019;8(6):622. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Okunade KS. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;40(5):602-08. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Ramakrishnan S, Partricia S, Mathan G. Overview of high-risk HPV’s 16 and 18 infected cervical cancer: Pathogenesis to prevention. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;70:103-10. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Dickson EL, Vogel RI, Geller MA, Downs Jr LS. Cervical cytology and multiple type HPV infection: A study of 8182 women ages 31-65. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(3):405-08. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Liao G, Jiang X, She B, Tang H, Wang Z, Zhou H, et al. Multi-infection patterns and co-infection preference of 27 human papillomavirus types among 137,943 gynecological outpatients across China. Front Oncol. 2020;10:449. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
McCluggage WG. Towards developing a meaningful grading system for cervical squamous cell carcinoma. J Pathol Clin Res. 2018;4(2):81-85. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Del Prete R, Ronga L, Magrone R, Addati G, Abbasciano A, Di Carlo D, et al. Epidemiological evaluation of human papillomavirus genotypes and their associations in multiple infections. Epidemiol Infect. 2019;147:e132. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
García-Espinosa B, Moro-Rodríguez E, Ãlvarez-Fernández E. Genotype distribution of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in histological sections of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical carcinoma in Madrid, Spain. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):01-09. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Simo RT, Nono AG, Dongmo HP, Etet PF, Fonyuy BK, Kamdje AH, et al. Prevalence of precancerous cervical lesions and high-risk human papillomavirus types in Yaounde, Cameroon. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021;15(09):1339-45. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Molina-Pineda A, López-Cardona MG, Limón-Toledo LP, Cantón-Romero JC, Martínez-Silva MG, Ramos-Sánchez HV, et al. High frequency of HPV genotypes 59, 66, 52, 51, 39 and 56 in women from Western Mexico. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):1-0. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Chabi MA, Capo-Chichi CD, Zohoncon TM, Aguemon C, Ambaliou A, Simpore J. Circulating high-risk HPV genotypes in the South of Benin and disparity with general immunization target. Am J Epidemiol Infect Dis. 2019;7(1):16-20.
19.
Bergqvist L, Kalliala I, Aro K, Auvinen E, Jakobsson M, Kiviharju M, et al. Distribution of HPV genotypes differs depending on behavioural factors among young women. Microorganisms. 2021;9(4):750. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Kesheh MM, Keyvani H. The prevalence of HPV genotypes in Iranian population: An update. Iran J Pathol. 2019;14(3):197. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Moussavou-Boundzanga P, Koumakpayi IH, EngohanAloghe C, Chansi JK, Revignet R, Leroy EM, et al. HPV genotypes in high-grade cervical lesions and invasive cervical carcinoma detected in Gabonese women. Infect Agent Cancer. 2023;18(1):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
AlBosale AH, Kovalenko KA, Mashkina EV. Genotype distribution and prevalence of human papillomavirus among Russian women in Rostov, Southern Federal District of Russia. Jordan J Biol Sci. 2021;14(3): 395-401. [crossref]
23.
Kadian L, Gulshan G, Sharma S, Kumari I, Yadav C, Nanda S, et al. A study on knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer among females of rural and urban areas of Haryana, North India. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36(4):844-49. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Dikshit R, Gupta PC, Ramasundarahettige C, Gajalakshmi V, Aleksandrowicz L, Badwe R, et al. Cancer mortality in India: A nationally representative survey. The Lancet. 2012;379(9828):1807-16.[crossref][PubMed]
25.
Louie KS, de Sanjose S, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Herrero R, Meijer CJ, et al; International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Early age at first sexual intercourse and early pregnancy are risk factors for cervical cancer in developing countries. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1191-97. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Gao G, Smith DI. Human papillomavirus and the development of different cancers. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2016;150(3-4):185-93. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Huang J, Deng Y, Boakye D, Tin MS, Lok V, Zhang L, et al. Global distribution, risk factors, and recent trends for cervical cancer: A worldwide country-level analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;164(1):85-92.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69276.19319

Date of Submission: Dec 26, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 06, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Mar 02, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: R.K. Foundation Fund, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak for providing the financial support to the study.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 26, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 16, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Feb 29, 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com