Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 42703

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : ZC42 - ZC46 Full Version

Colour Stability of Two Different Denture Base Resins and the Efficacy of Two Denture Cleansing Agents after Tea and Coffee Staining: An In-vitro Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66964.19334
Sonam S Agrawal, Monal M Kukde, Krishna Kumar S Lahoti, Jaykumar R Gade, Nandkishor J Bankar

1. Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Dentistry, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sonam S Agrawal,
201, Sai Regency, Ravi Nagar Square, Amravati Road, Nagpur-440033, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: dr.sonamvagrawal@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: In dentistry, colour is one of the most important dimensions of aesthetics. Due to the diverse food habits in India, stains accumulate on dentures. Various denture cleansing agents such as Fittydent and Clinsodent are widely used, emphasising the importance of patient oral hygiene.

Aim: To evaluate the colour stability of heat-cure activated acrylic denture base resins {Dental Products of India (DPI) and Trevalon} after staining with tea and coffee, subsequently treated with Clinsodent, Fittydent, and distilled water (control group) as cleansing agents.

Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study was conducted at Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, in the Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, and Implantology in collaboration with Indorama, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, over a period of approximately 90 days (August-October 2017). Total 120 samples were prepared in-vitro study using custom-made brass metal discs measuring 10 mm by 2 mm. Trevalon and DPI heat-cure acrylic denture base resins were used for sample preparation. Baseline colour stability values were established after immersing the samples in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. The samples were then stained for eight hours, followed by immersion in different cleansing agents and distilled water for 12 hours. This process was repeated every 24 hours for 60 days, with the staining and cleansing agents replenished daily. Colour measurements were taken at baseline, 15th, 30th, 45th, and 60th days. Statistical analysis involved t-tests and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).

Results: The DPI denture base resin exhibited a highly significant ?E (change in energy) at 45 days (p=0.0001), while Trevalon showed significance at 60 days (p=0.0079). The difference in means was statistically significant using t-tests for independent samples, and the variance-measure analysis indicated statistical significance in the means of ?E. The comparison of the three cleansing agents at 60 days was statistically obtained using one-way ANOVA.

Conclusion: Dental Products of India (DPI) showed more colour variation than Trevalon. Tea showed a higher staining than coffee. Staining intensity increased over time, peaking at 45 days and stabilising thereafter. Clinsodent is better than Fittydent in removing stains.

Keywords

Clinsodent, Colourimeter, Fittydent, Polymethylmethacrylate denture base resin, Stains

In dentistry, edentulism detoriates the patient physical and psychological health. Therefore heat-cure acrylic denture base resins are commonly utilised due to their cost-effectiveness, good mechanical properties, and ability to replicate the colour and contour of oral tissues. In India, diverse food habits contribute to the accumulation of stains on dentures. Such stains can be due to commonly used beverages like tea and coffee are common culprits, causing discolouration and plaque accumulation. Stain accumulation, incomplete polymerisation, water sorption, ingredient degradation, intrinsic dye dissolving, and surface roughness are factors responsible for denture discolouration. Diet and oral hygiene also play crucial roles in this process (1),(2).

Thus, the, denture wearers must adhere to a stringent denture cleansing regimen to prevent biofilm formation on denture surfaces (3). The most commonly practiced method involves denture cleansing with a toothbrush and dentifrice or soap due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and proven efficacy in removing organic deposits (4). However, brushing with dentifrices can significantly impact the wear and roughness of restorative and prosthetic materials (5). Colourimetric measurements allow for the objective comparison of colour changes in materials, eliminating subjective interpretations of visual colour assessments (6).

Hollis et al., measured the colour stability using a spectrocolourimeter of three different denture base resins (light-polymerised Eclipse, heat-polymerised Lucitone 199 Heat, and autopolymerised Lucitone 199 Repair) after staining with coffee, cola, or grape juice and soaking in commercial denture cleansers such as Polident and Efferdent in the United States (7).

The present study aimed to evaluate the in-vitro colour stability of two commonly used denture base resins in India after staining with tea and coffee, using different cleansing agents like Clinsodent and Fittydent, with distilled water as a control. The proposed null hypothesis suggests that there will be no colour change in the two denture base resins after staining with tea or coffee, followed by exposure to Clinsodent and Fittydent, and distilled water at various time intervals.

Material and Methods

This in-vitro study was conducted at Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, in the Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, and Implantology in collaboration with Indorama, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, over a period of approximately 90 days (August-October 2017). The study received approval from the Institutional Ethical approval board with reference number (SDKS/PG/syn/prostho3/7/2015).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Finished and polished samples measuring 10×2 mm were used for the study. Samples with processing errors leading to porosity, dimensional changes, or rough surfaces were excluded.

Study Procedure

Heat-polymerised acrylic resin test samples were prepared using a custom-made brass metal disc measuring 10 mm by 2 mm in dimensions and grouped accordingly (Table/Fig 1). Six circular discs were placed in each flask before the initial set of dental stones (Kalstone, Kalabhai Karson India Private Limited, Mumbai) in the base flask (Varsity flask Jabbar and Company), exposing their superior surface. Metallic discs were retrieved from the flask to obtain mold spaces for preparing the test specimens. The heat-activated monomer and polymer were mixed and set aside until reaching the final (dough) stage for packing. After polymerisation, the resin samples were recovered after overnight bench cooling and deflasking. A finishing and polishing procedure was performed, and each specimen was numbered using a carbide bur. Digital vernier calipers were used to measure each sample.

Total 120 (60 of each) of Trevalon (Dentsply India Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram) and DPI (Dental Products of India, Mumbai) denture base resin materials were prepared (Table/Fig 2). The samples were preserved at 37oC for one day, and the baseline colourimetry values were measured using a Hunter Lab colourimeter (D25 M Optical Sensor, Reston, Virginia, USA) for each sample.

Different beverages were prepared for staining. The tea solution (Taj Mahal Brooke Bond, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., Mumbai) was made using four tea bags in 1000 mL of boiled distilled water, cooled, and poured into 60 beakers containing samples of DPI and Trevalon (8). The coffee solution (Nescafe Classic, Nestle India Ltd., New Delhi) was made using 100 mg of instant coffee in 1000 mL of purified water and poured into 60 beakers containing samples of DPI and Trevalon.

Total 30 samples of each PMMA denture base resin were immersed in the tea and coffee staining substrates, respectively, each day for eight hours (Table/Fig 3) (7).

Two denture cleaning agents, Clinsodent and Fittydent, were used for immersionas test specimens (Table/Fig 4), with distilled water serving as the control. Clinsodent powder was mixed with 100 mL of distilled water in a beaker, and samples of each DPI and Trevalon heat-activated resin were soaked in the solution. A Fittydent tablet was dissolved in 100 mL of distilled water in a beaker, and DPI and Trevalon heat-activated resin samples were soaked in the solution. After eight hours of immersion in tea and coffee, the samples were washed with purified water and then placed in the denture cleansing agents and water for 12 hours at room temperature, with distilled water as the control (7).

Out of the 120 samples, 80 samples of DPI and Trevalon denture base resins, after staining with tea and coffee, were immersed in Clinsodent and Fittydent denture cleansing agents, with 40 samples placed in distilled water as the control group (Table/Fig 5). Each day, new solutions were prepared for immersing the specimens for 60 days. The 120 samples were tested on day 0, 15th day, 30th day, 45th day, and 60th day using Hunter’s Lab colourimeter (Table/Fig 6).

The mean and standard deviations of the colour change (E) were obtained using the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage L* a* b* (CIELab) system, which is a uniform three-dimensional system for determining colour changes. The CIELab system is widely used for determining chromatic differences and is more advantageous than the Munsell colour system.

Colour changes were calculated for each specimen using the formula: ?E*={(ΔL*)2+(Δa*)2+(Δb*)2}1/2. In this formula, L* represents lightness and darkness on a scale of 0 (black) to 100 (white), a* and b* represent chromatic scales, with positive a* corresponding to red and negative a* corresponding to green, and positive b* corresponding to yellow and negative b* corresponding to blue (9).

In conclusion, the colour change of the samples was measured at various time points using the CIE Lab system. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of different denture cleaning agents in removing tea and coffee stains from the denture base resin materials. The results of the study will provide valuable information for dental professionals in selecting appropriate cleaning agents for maintaining the aesthetics of dentures.

Statistical Analysis

The data were statistically evaluated using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 software. A student’s t-test was employed for independent variables, with a confidence level of 99%. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine differences between the means of independent groups.

Results

For DPI, tea stained more than coffee in Clinsodent and Fittydent at 15, 30, 45, and 60 days. Staining significantly increased over time for both tea and coffee, with a p-value <0.0001 (Table/Fig 7). Similar results were seen for Trevalon. Staining was more with tea compared to coffee at 60 days for Trevalon samples in both Clinsodent (p=0.0181) and Fittydent (p=0.0294) solutions (Table/Fig 8).

For tea stained samples dipped in distilled water, the mean colour change at 15 days was 3.21±0.17 for DPI and 5.45±0.87 for Trevalon (p-value <0.0001). At 60 days, the mean colour change was 11.78±1.52 for Trevalon and 9.98±0.59 for DPI, with a statistically insignificant difference (p=0.0774). The colour change of samples stained with tea was higher in Trevalon compared to DPI in both Clinsodent and Fittydent solutions at 60 days (Table/Fig 9). Similarly, for coffee-stained samples in Clinsodent, the mean colour change at 15 days was 3.96±0.44 for DPI and 4.81±0.45 for Trevalon. At 60 days, the mean colour change was 11.58±0.55 for Trevalon and 10.82±1.16 for DPI (p=0.0860) (Table/Fig 10).

For DPI samples dipped in the cleansing agent Clinsodent, the mean colour change for tea was maximum 9.69±0.76 at 45 days, followed by 9.66±1.08 at 60 days. For Fittydent, the mean colour change for tea was highest at 10.11±0.91 for 45 days, followed by 9.84±0.71 at 60 days. However, for coffee-stained DPI samples, the maximum mean colour change was observed at 60 days for samples dipped in Clinsodent, Fittydent, and distilled water. The difference in mean ?E across times was highly statistically significant for both tea and coffee-stained samples, with a p-value <0.0001 (Table/Fig 11). The difference in the mean colour change of Trevalon samples stained with tea across all three cleansing agents at 60 days was statistically significant (p=0.0079), with the highest colour change observed in samples dipped in Clinsodent (Table/Fig 12).

Discussion

Polymethylmethacrylate is commonly used for denture base fabrication. Denture wearers often face significant issues with denture staining, which can make the prosthesis aesthetically unacceptable (7). Geriatric patients, with diminished manual dexterity and motor capacity, require a mechanical and chemical cleaning method involving immersion in a denture cleaning agent (7),(8).

Discolouration assessment can be done visually or with instruments. Using a measurement instrument eliminates errors due to differences in subjective colour interpretation. A colourimeter was utilised in present study. Measurements obtained from a colourimeter serve the purpose of quantitative analysis and objective comparison of colour changes in materials (9).

The study results indicate that staining intensifies over time, with the colour change value (?E) increasing up to 45 days. Water sorption initially softens the polymer resin component by swelling the network, reducing frictional forces between polymer chains. The absorbed moisture acts as a plasticiser, lowering the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the polymerised resins. Water sorption eventually leads to irreversible damage through microcrack formation and hydrolytic degradation of the polymer with scission of the ester linkages and gradual deterioration of the infrastructure of the polymer over time. Once the polar sites in the polymer network become saturated with water, equilibrium is reached between bound and free sites and the water sorption stabilises, intermitting its absorption (10).

Acrylic resin has a tendency to absorb solvent or water owing to the polarity of polymethylmethacrylate molecules. The absorbed solvent diffuses into the polymer network, disrupting polymeric linkages and causing hydrolytic degradation, resulting in a colour change of the acrylic resin (11). Water sorption saturation in polymeric materials leads to stabilising colour changes. When the polar sites in the polymer network become saturated, equilibrium is reached between the bound and free sites, thereby limiting further water sorption (12).

In present study, coffee caused more staining than tea because tea discolouration is mainly caused by surface adsorption, while coffee staining involves both adsorption and absorption of colourants. Um CM and Ruyter IE reported that the yellow colourants have different polarities, yellow colourants of coffee were less polar and thereby less hydrophilic than yellow colourants of tea (13). Therefore, the discolouration of tea was easily removed as compared to coffee. Hollis S et al., has evaluated colour stability using beverages such as cola, grape juice and coffee, coffee contains tannic acid (pH6-6.4), which causes its yellow brown colour, and is primary staining ingredient (7). Bagheri R et al., measured the pH of tea is 5.38 and of coffee is 5.01, so coffee stains more (14).

Clinsodent and Fittydent, both peroxide-type denture cleaners, were compared. Clinsodent, containing potassium persulfate, sodium perborate, and other ingredients, outperformed Fittydent for stain removal. The hydrogen peroxide solution formed by these cleaners, along with alkaline detergents, aids in mechanical cleaning (15).

Researchers have found that cleansing agents containing sodium perborate with trisodium phosphate are more effective in stain removal than those containing sodium perborate with sodium bicarbonate or water as a control (16).

Limitation(s)

One limitation of present study is that only heat-activated DPI and Trevalon resins were used. Other resins, such as meliodent or lucitone, were not included. Additionally, while two common beverages, tea and coffee, were used for staining, other prevalent staining agents in India like turmeric, tobacco chewing, and paan were not considered. Furthermore, as an in-vitro study conducted under controlled conditions, the presence of multiple colourants simultaneously in the diet, as seen in real-life scenarios, was not accounted for.

Conclusion

The study focused on measuring the colour stability of two base denture resins and the effectiveness of various denture cleansing agents after staining with tea and coffee. It was observed that DPI and Trevalon show statistically significant colour changes when exposed to tea and coffee, with Trevalon showing more variation than DPI. Coffee had a greater staining effect on the samples compared to tea. Staining intensity increased over time, with colour change values (?E) rising up to 45 days before stabilising. Clinsodent was found to be more effective than Fittydent in removing stains caused by tea and coffee.

To enhance the evaluation of different staining and cleansing agents, future studies could benefit from larger sample sizes. Additionally, conducting studies in patients to assess colour stability may provide further insights into the efficacy of denture materials and cleaning agents.

References

1.
Wozniak WT, Muller TP, Silverman R, Moser JB. Photographic assessment of colour changes in cold and heat-cure resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1981;8(4):333-39. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Pellizzaro D, Polyzois G, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Sanitá PV, Vergani CE. Effectiveness of mechanical brushing with different denture cleansing agents in reducing in vitro Candida albicans biofilm viability. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(5):547-54. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
de Andrade IM, Silva-Lovato CH, de Souza RF, Pisani MX, de Andrade KM, Paranhos HD. Trial of experimental toothpastes regarding quality for cleaning dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25(2):157-59.
4.
de Freitas Pontes KM, de Holanda JC, Fonteles CS, de Barros Pontes C, da Silva CH, Paranhos HD. Effect of toothbrushes and denture brushes on heat-polymerized acrylic resins. Gen Dent. 2016;64(1):49-53.
5.
Gross MD, Moser JB. A colourimetric study of the staining of coffee and tea of four composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1977;4(4):311-22. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Hong G, Murata H, Li Y, Sadamori S, Hamada T. Influence of denture cleansers on the colour stability of three types of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(3):205-13. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Hollis S, Eisenbeisz E, Versluis A. Colour stability of denture resins after staining and exposure to cleansing agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(5):709-14. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Crispin BJ, Caputo AA. Colour stability of temporary restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42(1):27-33. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Mathai JR, Sholapurkar AA, Raghu A, Shenoy RP, Mallya HM, Pai KM, et al. Comparison of efficacy of sodium hypochlorite with sodium perborate in removal of stains from heat-cured clear acrylic resin. N Y State Dent J. 2011;77(4):48-53. PMID: 21894833.
10.
De Rezende Pinto L, Rodriguez Acosta EJ, Távora FF, Da Silva PM, Porto VC. Effect of repeated cycles of chemical disinfection on the roughness and hardness of hard reline acrylic resins. Gerodontology. 2010;27(2):147-53. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):211-22. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Silva PM, Acosta EJ, Jacobina M, Pinto LD, Porto VC. Effect of repeated immersion solution cycles on the colour stability of denture tooth acrylic resins. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(6):623-27. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Um CM, Ruyter IE. Staining resin-based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence Int. 1991;22(5):377-86.
14.
Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005;33(5):389-98. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Budtz-Jørgensen E. Materials and methods for cleaning dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42(6):619-23. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Makhija PP, Shigli K, Awinashe V. Evaluating the efficacy of denture cleansing materials in removing tea and turmeric stains: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2016;27(5):528.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66964.19334

Date of Submission: Aug 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 14, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 03, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 10, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 20, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 01, 2024 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com