Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 133840

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2010 | Month : February | Volume : 4 | Issue : 1 | Page : 2031 - 2035 Full Version

Diagnosis Of Porphyria By Measuring Metabolites Of Heme Biosynthesis In Correlation With Clinical Findings


Published: February 1, 2010 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2010/.647
SORTE K *, PALANDURKAR K **, GOYAL M ***, SINGH A L ****, BASAK A*****.

Departments of Biochemistry and Dermatology Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College,Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences. University,Wardha-442004 (India)

Correspondence Address :
Anjan Basak
e-mail address: drabasak1@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background: Porphyria is a group of genetic diseases which require specialized laboratory facilities for accurate diagnosis .Facilities for diagnosis of Porphyria have been established in our institution since 1996 with few biochemical investigations in correlation with clinical findings.
Materials And Methods: Quantification of urinary total porphyrins was done by Double beam computerized spectrophotometer. Urine porphobilinogen (PBG) is screened by Hoesch test (1) and confirmed by Watson-Schwartz test (2). Presence of PBG in urine was further confirmed by wavelength scanning by spectrophotometer.
Results And Discussion: Normal value of total porphyrins in urine: <35nmol/µmol of creatinine. In last 12 years, we have diagnosed four cases of Porphyria. The two cases were diagnosed as Acute Intermittent Porphyria (AIP) on the basis of increased levels of urine total porphyrins, increased urine PBG with symptoms of acute neurovisceral attack. In one case, there was increased level of total urine porphyrins up to 91.6 nmol/µmol of creatinine with history of photosensitivity, skin bullae with scars since childhood. The case was diagnosed as Congenital Erythropoetic Porphyria (CEP). In the other one, urinary total porphyrins was increased up to 1695 nmol/µmol of creatinine and urine PBG was absent with signs of cutaneous manifestations due to precipitating factors. This case was diagnosed as Porphyria Cutanea Tarda (PCT).
Conclusion: Any Biochemistry Laboratory having spectrophotometer can diagnose porphyria with clinical correlation.

Porphyria is the group of genetic diseases resulting due to defect in heme biosynthesis. Defect in each enzyme gives rise to different porphyria with variable clinical manifestations.

Pinpoint diagnosis of porphyria requires well equipped laboratory facility but few front line laboratory investigations should be done
whenever clinical findings suggest porphyria. (Table/Fig 1)

Aims and Objectives
To diagnose porphyria by measuring metabolites of heme biosynthesis in correlation with clinical features.

Material and Methods

Simple methods using technique of spectrophotometry have been used in the study for initial investigations of the patients who are clinically suspected for porphyria.

Instruments
1. Spectrophotometer (ELICO, Model No. BL-198)
2. Centrifuge
3. Vortex mixer

Reagents
1. Ehrlich’s reagent (Hoesch test solution): 2 gms of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in 100 ml of 6 M, HCl. Stable for 09 months at room temperature (1).
2. Ehrlich’s reagent (Watson-Schwartz test solution): 0.7 gm of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in 150 ml of concentrated HCl, add 100 ml of water and mix (1).
3. Saturated solution of sodium acetate
4. Chloroform
5. Butanol
6. Creatinine estimation kit by Jaffe’s kinetic method

Specimen Collection and Stability
All samples must be protected from light; urinary porphyrin concentrations can decrease by up to 50% if kept in the light for 24 hours. Urinary PBG and porphyrins are best analysed in a fresh, random sample (10–20 ml) collected without preservative (Table/Fig 2). Twenty four hour collections offer little advantage, delay diagnosis, and increase the risk of losses during the collection period. PBG and porphyrins are stable in urine in the dark at 4°C for up to 48 hours and for at least a month at −20°C. Very dilute urine (creatinine < 4 mmol/litre) is unsuitable for analysis (Table/Fig 2).


Procedure for Performing the Tests
PBG in urine

Screening test for PBG

Hoesch Test: was used as a screening test for PBG (1). 2ml of Ehrlich’s reagent was placed into a test tube then overlayed with 3 drops of urine. If .PBG was present, an immediate cherry red color developed at the point of mixing . False positive test may be encountered by the presence of indicator dyes derived from foods, soft drinks, medicines etc (3) (Table/Fig 3).


Confirmatory Test for PBG
Watson-Schwartz Test was used as a confirmatory test for PBG (1). This test was performed only in Hoesh test positive samples In 2 ml of urine 2ml of Ehrlich’s reagent was added and mixed well, then mixed with 4ml of saturated sodium acetate solution. The pH of the reagent was set in between to 4-5 with narrow range pH indicator paper. Now, 3.0 ml of chloroform was added and vortexed for 1 min. The tube was kept undisturbed for phases to separate. The upper aqueous layer was examined for magenta color. If magenta color did not develop, then there was no need to proceed further. Lower chloroform layer was removed and 2.0 ml n-butanol was added and vortexed for 01 min. Magenta color was examined in lower aqueous layer which indicated presence of PBG. Butanol extraction procedure was repeated twice. This increased the specificity of PBG detection (Table/Fig 4).


Absorption spectra of PBG: PBG reacts with Ehrlich’s aldehyde reagent (of Watson-Schwartz test) in acidic medium to give red condensation product with characteristic absorption spectrum that has peak at 553 nm and preceded by a shoulder at 540 nm. To generate this absorption spectrum of PBG, magenta colored aqueous layer of Watson-Schwartz test was used (3) (Table/Fig 5).


Jaffe’s kinetic method for creatinine estimation: Urine dilution: to 9.9ml of analytical grade water 100μL urine was mixed to get 100 times diluted urine. To 500μL of alkaline picrate reagent (250μL of picric acid reagent was added to 250μL of sodium hydroxide solution) 100μL of 100 time diluted urine was mixed. Reading was taken in analyzer for 60 seconds with lag of initial 20 seconds at 492nm.

Total porphyrins in urine:4ml of centrifuged urine was mixed with 1 ml of concentrated HCl. Undissolved materials were removed by centrifugation. 0.5 ml of supernatant was taken in cuvette and wavelength scanning was done in spectrophotometer in between 350 nm to 450 nm against air blank. If peak absorbance was found near to 400 nm (Soret band) then presence of porphyrins was confirmed (3).


Total urinary porphyrins = A x 2500 (3)
μmol of creatinine/liter of urine

“A” is the peak absorbance above the base line between two suitable points as shown in (Table/Fig 4).
The factor 2500 was derived from volume of urine, the volume of acid (thus the dilution of the sample is 5 times) and millimolar extinction coefficient i.e. 500 which was approximately that of a 7:1 (mol: mol) mixture of coproporphyrin-III and uroporphyrin-III in 2.3M HCl. The porphyrin composition of this mixture resembled that of normal urine (3).

Results

The normal value of total pophyrins in urine: < 35 nmol/m mol of creatinine (3). Biochemical investigation results were correlated with clinical findings to diagnose different types of porphyria (1).

In two cases of AIP, patients having history of acute neurovisceral attack, very severe ill defined abdominal pain, pain in extremities, sensory loss with complaints of seizure, anxiety and hallucinations. They had sympathetic over activity characterized by raised blood pressure and sweating. They were asymptomatic till puberty but had sudden onset of symptoms after puberty. There were no cutaneous manifestations. Increased urinary PBG was detected by Watson-Schwartz test and confirmed by wave-length scanning with spectrophotometer. So, the patients were diagnosed as cases of AIP (1).

In case of CEP, the child had a history of severe photosensitivity since birth, fragile skin with bullae, infections and scars (Case-2) over skin persisted and having features of mutilation of digits (Case-2 (a)) and facial features like Erythrodontia i.e. red brown colored teeth; there was a history of pink staining diapers during infancy due to porphyrin excretion through sweat and cornea was damaged due to photosensitivity (1).The total urine porphyrin was 91.6 nmol/μmol of creatinine and the urinary PBG was absent. So, the patient was diagnosed as a case of CEP (1).

In case of PCT, 24 year male patients with severe cutaneous manifestations over exposed areas on the skin were precipitated by first-time alcohol intake (case-1) without any neurovisceral symptoms. Total urinary porphyrins raised upto 1695 nmol/μmol of creatinine and the urinary PBG was absent. So, the patient was diagnosed as a case of PCT (1).

Discussion

Urine sample
We have formulated this flowchart by which we can simplify the diagnosis of porphyria with the tests described above correlating with the relevant clinical findings. This flow chart will be helpful to all those who are willing to do the diagnosis of porphyria (Table/Fig 6).

In this we have incorporated Hoesch test as a screening test for the urinary porphobilinogen (PBG).

Out of four cases, two cases were AIP and one case was PCT and other one was CEP.

In two cases, patients having very severe ill defined abdominal pain, pain in extremities, sensory loss with complaints of seizure, anxiety and hallucinations. They had sympathetic over activity characterized by raised blood pressure and sweating. They were asymptomatic till puberty but had sudden onset of symptoms after puberty. There were no cutaneous manifestations. Thus their clinical findings were suggestive of Acute Intermittent Porphyria. So, they were first screened with Hoesch test urinary PBG. When found positive, were further detected by Watson-Schwartz test for increased PBG and confirmed by wave-length scanning with spectrophotometer. Thus the patients were diagnosed as cases of AIP.

In another case, a 24 year male patient with severe cutaneous manifestations over exposed areas were precipitated by alcohol intake (case-1) without any neurovisceral symptoms; so, they were first screened with Hoesch test urinary PBG. When found negative, total urinary porphyrins were estimated, which was raised upto 1695 nmol/μmol of creatinine. So, the patient was diagnosed as a case of Porphyria Cutanea Tarda.

In a case , the child had a history of severe photosensitivity since birth, fragile skin with bullae, scars and infections (Case-2) over skin persisted and having features of mutilation of digits (Case-2 (a) and facial features; there was a history of pink staining diapers during infancy due to porphyrin excretion through sweat and cornea was damaged due to photosensitivity.

So, he was first screened with Hoesch test urinary PBG. When found negative, the total urine porphyrins were estimated which were found to be 91.6 nmol/μmol of creatinine. So, the patient was diagnosed as a case of Congenital Erythropoetic Porphyria.

In the similar way all other types of porphyria can be diagnosed by following the same protocol.

These 04 cases were diagnosed in our laboratory with simple test and by double beam spectrophotometer. Individual porphyrins estimation requires further solvent fractionation of 24 hour urine followed by identification and quantitification by spectrophotometer. As we have limited facility, we diagnosed the cases correlating our laboratory finding with clinical features.

If magenta color develops in lower layer that indicates presence of urobilinogen Secondary coprporphyrinuria is seen in liver dysfunction alcoholism and lead poisoning, but without typical clinical features of porphyria. Fluorescence spectroscopy is required for differentiation between porphyria and psudoporphyria caused by non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs and some other drugs in which the porphyrin metabolism is normal. Differentiation of VP and HCP is difficult with our laboratory but this can be achieved by plasma fluorescent emission scan by spectrofluorophotometer to pinpoint diagnosis.

Conclusion

With limited laboratory facility we could diagnose three different varieties of porphyria. Our message is any laboratory having spectrophotometer with wavelength scanning mode can diagnose porphyria cases with clinical correlation as we did.

Acknowledgement

The authors highly acknowledge Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University, Wardha (India), for funding this work and also to Dr. Silpi Basak, Professor of Microbiology, for conceiving the massage of this article.

References

1.
Labbe RF and Lamon JM, Porphyrins and Disorders of porphyrin metabolism, In: Tietz N.W. et. al., Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, 2nd ed; W.B.Saunders, 1986; p.1589-1611.
2.
Desnick RJ, The Porphyrias, IN: Kasper D.L. et. al., Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 16th ed, vol- II; McGraw-Hill, 2005; p.2303-7.
3.
Deacon AC and Elder GH. Front line tests for the investigation of suspected porphyria.J.Clin.Path. 2001; 54: 500-7.
4.
Anderson KE, Lee C and Desnick R., The Porphyrias, IN: Kliegman et. al.; Nelson’s Textbook of Pediatrics, 18ed, vol-I, part I-XVI, Elsevier, 2007; p.637-54.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com