Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 154943

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : June | Volume : 5 | Issue : 3 | Page : 456 - 458 Full Version

The Clinical Profile and the Efficacy of Prazosin in Scorpion Sting Envenomation in Children of North Karnataka (India)


Published: June 1, 2011 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1359
RAMESH POL, RAGHAVENDRA VANAKI, MANSWINI POL

Corresponding Author. Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, S.N.Medical College, Bagalkot-587102, India. Department of Radiology, S.N.Medical College, Bagalkot-587102, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ramesh Pol, Assistant Professor,
Department of Pediatrics, S.N.Medical College,
Bagalkot-587102, Karnataka, India
E-mail: rameshpol1004@yahoo.co.in; Mobile-+91-9945308081

Abstract

Objective: This study was an evaluation of the pattern of presentation, the outcome and the efficacy of Prazosin in scorpion sting envenomation at a tertiary care hospital in Bagalkot, India.

Methods: A total of 240 consecutive children were prospectively studied. The data included demographics, the time of presentation to the hospital, the clinical features, and the premedication which was given before the arrival of the subjects at the hospital, response to the oral Prazosin and the hospital outcome.

Results: Local pain, sweating and peripheral circulatory failure were the common clinical presentations. Complications like acutepulmonary oedema, myocarditis, shock and encephalopathy were also seen. These were treated with a combination of Prazosin with either inotropes or vasodilators. Mortality was seen in 18 (7.5%) children. The usage of antihistaminics and steroids in these children led to higher mortality. Oral Prazosin, a postsynaptic alpha –1 blocker, is a highly effective drug for scorpion sting envenomation.

Conclusion: Scorpion sting envenomation is an acute life threatening emergency and an early presentation to the hospital and an early intervention with Prazosin can hasten the recovery in the scorpion sting victim.

Keywords

Scorpion, Myocarditis, Envenomation, Prazosin

Scorpion sting envenomation is an acute life threatening time limited medical emergency, if left untreated. It is a frequent event in the tropical, subtropical and the temperate zones of the world and poses a public health problem in certain parts of India also (1). Mesobuthus tamulus or the Indian red scorpion is the most lethal scorpion species. These are found abundantly in western Maharashtra, northern Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Saurashtra and Tamilnadu (2) (3). Children are at greater risk of developing severe envenomation like cardiac, respiratory and neurological complications as compared to the adults. The clinical manifestations of scorpion envenomation are vomiting, profuse sweating, cold extremities, pulmonary oedema and death (4) (5). The deaths in scorpion sting envenomation are attributed to cardiopulmonary complications like myocarditis and acute pulmonary oedema (6) (7) (8).

Prazosin, a postsynaptic alpha –1 blocker, counteracts the effects of excessive catecholamines and arrests the development of severe systemic features. It has been found to be an effective drug for scorpion sting envenomation and it has reduced the mortality rate to 1% as compared to a 30% mortality rate in the pre-Prazosin era (9)(10) (11). The present study was done to observe the pattern of presentation and also the outcome and the efficacy of Prazosin in scorpion sting envenomation in children who were admitted at tertiary care center.

Material and Methods

This prospective study was conducted at S. Nijalingappa Medical College, Bagalkot, a tertiary care hospital in North Karnataka, India, during the period from January 2007 to December 2010 (4 years). All the cases who were aged between 0-14 years andwho presented to the emergency department with a history of scorpion sting envenomation, the presence of the sting mark and with the sting or the scorpion seen in the vicinity of the child by the parents or near family members were admitted. In total, around 240 cases were studied during this 4-year period. Informed consent was taken from the parents or the relatives of the children. The details of the clinical features and the treatment which was given at the PHC/referring hospital were noted from the reference letter. All clinical details including blood pressure, heart rate, chest findings and the temperature of the extremities were recorded at intervals and thereafter at each one hour on a pretested standard proforma.

The diagnosis of various systemic involvements was done based on the clinical manifestations and investigations. Myocarditis was diagnosed if the child had tachycardia, muffled heart sounds, a gallop rhythm and a systolic murmur, ECG changes (low amplitude, ST segment changes, and the presence of arrhythmias), elevated LDH, cardiomegaly on chest X-ray and a decreased ejection fraction on 2 D Echocardiography. Acute pulmonary oedema was diagnosed on the basis of the presence of tachypnoea, a pinkish frothy sputum, bilateral crepitations and radiological findings which were complemented by the ABG analysis. The autonomic storm was diagnosed on the basis of sweating, vomiting, excessive salivation, priaprism, shivering and hypotension or hypertension.

The patients were continuously monitored in the intensive care unit for pulse rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, temperature, SPO2, capillary refilling time and for signs of systemic involvements like the development of pulmonary oedema, myocarditis, encephalopathy and shock. A complete haemogram, serum electrolytes, blood sugar, arterial blood gas analysis, renal function tests, ECG and chest radiographs were done and evaluated inall children. 2D Echocardiography was done in all patients with myocarditis.

Cases with a history of scorpion sting which came within 6 hours were given Paracetamol for pain and a dose of Prazosin (30ug/ kg) tablet either through a naso-gastric tube or per oral, which were given 4 hourly till all the symptoms subsided. Asymptomatic cases which came after 6 hours of the scorpion sting were kept under observation and they received only symptomatic treatment without Prazosin. All the symptomatic cases were given Prazosin and supportive care. Children with acute pulmonary oedema were managed with the judicious use of vasodilators and inotropes along with supportive measures and were ventilated whenever required. All the cases were observed for a minimum period of 24 hours. Cases with complications were discharged after they were off the drugs for 24 hours and after they were stable for 48 hours.

The analysis was done in with respect to the complications, the time interval between the scorpion sting and admission to the hospital and mortality.

Results

240 children between the age group of 0–14 years were studied during the study period. 80 children had local involvement i.e. pain and swelling at the sting area. They were hence observed for 24 hours and discharged as per the protocol. The remaining 160 children were symptomatic and were treated with Prazosin and IV fluids and symptomatic treatment whenever required, like vasodilators and inotropes were used. Most of the cases were within the age range of 2 –7 yrs i.e.180 (75%), followed by the age range of 8-12 years. 140 (58.3%) males and 100(41.7%) females were affected. The maximum numbers of cases were from the rural areas, accounting for 214 (89.2%) cases with peaks during summer. The Indian red scorpion (Mesobuthus tamulus) species was the cause for 175 (72.9%) of the cases. Most of the bites occurred during the night time 164 (68.3%). The most common site of the sting was the extremities, mainly over the lower limbs, accounting for 171(71. 5%) cases followed by the upper limb in 57 (23.8%) cases and the face in 12 (4.7%) cases.

Children who came late had the features of excessive sympathetic activity (tachycardia, intense vasoconstriction and carditis). Those children who presented immediately after the sting (within 30 minutes) had the features of parasympathetic hyperactivity (i.e. sweating, salivation bronchospasm and vomiting). All these symptoms indicated the autonomic storm at presentation. The most common presenting symptoms were irritability and profuse sweating, hurried breathing and cold extremities followed by an altered sensorium. The most common clinical signs were tachycardia, tachypnoea, cold extremities, perspiration and hypotension (Table/Fig 1). A majority of the cases approached the hospital after 6-12 hours of the scorpion sting.

Myocarditis was detected in 48 (20%) cases clinically could be diagnosed in 40% of cases after other investigations like ECG findings like ST segment depression in 25% cases. 48 cases (20%) had pulmonary oedema with myocarditis. Acute pulmonary oedema with myocarditis, shock and encephalopathy were found in 30 (12.5%) patients and 25 of them required mechanical ventilation. Out of the 25 patients, 18 died. All the 18 patients who died had received intravenous dexamethasone and antihistaminics prior to the presentation to the hospital and they had presented 6-12 hours after sting.

Mortality and complications were seen in those patients who presented to the hospital after 6 hours of the sting. Most of the deaths (75%) were seen in the age group between 1-5 years. The highest mortality was due to cardiovascular complications i.e. myocarditis in 74%, pulmonary oedema in 22% and encephalopathy in 4% cases. 5 cases were complicated with thromboembolic features (deep vein thrombosis and arterial thrombosis). In 2 cases, on follow up, echocardiography showed ventricular dilatation.

Discussion

The Indian red scorpion’s (Mesobuthus tamulus’) venom is a potent sodium channel activator (12), resulting in the stimulation of the autonomic nervous system, which in turn leads to the sudden release of endogenous catecholamines into the circulation (3). The venom initially leads to a transient cholinergic phase, followed by sustained adrenergic hyperactivity, which is a venom dose dependent phenomenon (13). The clinical manifestations depend upon the dose of the venom, the age of the child, the season of the sting and the time lapse between the sting and hospitalization (5).

Of the 240 cases, 140 (58.3%) were boys and 100 (41.7%) were girls, as was also reported by Biswal et al (14). 214 (89.2%) cases of scorpion stings came from rural areas and 164 (68.3%) cases had the sting over the foot-leg, which was similar to Bosnak et al’s observations (15), where 71% cases were from rural areas and 55.6% had the sting over the foot-leg. Peripheral circulatory failure cases with cold extremities were seen in 180 (75%) of the cases which was similar to the 83% cases which were reported by Bawaskar et al (11) and the 75.5% cases which were reported by Biswal et al (14). This is due to early stage of compensated shock due to excessive catecholamine, resulting in peripheral vasoconstriction, but without significant myocardial dysfunction.

Most of the cases with myocarditis had acute pulmonary oedema and many had the S3 gallop. The late onset acute pulmonary oedema could have been due to the acute myocardial injury and the left ventricular failure and the toxin induced autonomic storm. There was no significant difference between the means of the basic parameters such as age, blood pressure, GCS, haemoglobin levels, total leukocyte count and serum electrolytes among both the survivors and the non-survivors.

The time gap between the scorpion sting and presentation to the hospital is one of the significant risk factors which determine better outcomes and mortality. Children who presented after 6 hours of the sting had a significantly higher mortality rate, as was also reported by Biswal et al (14). Most of the cases with acute pulmonary oedema, encephalopathy and myocarditis, who came to us after 6 hours of the sting, had higher mortality and morbidity. However, some studies (6), (11) have shown higher mortality in those patients who were admitted between 30 min to 3 hours of the sting.

The mortality which was observed in this study was seen in 18 (7.5%) cases, as compared to the 1% to 10.7% which was reported by various authors from different places (14), (16), (17), (18). The causes for higher mortality may be late presentation, the use of intravenous dexamethasone and antihistaminics and associated multiple systemic involvements. Dexamethasone alone or in combination with antihistaminics is known to potentiate the effect of catecholamine on the cardiovascular system and the CNS and to worsen the encephalopathy, as was also observed by other authors (14), (19).

The mortality was less in cases which were treated with Prazosin alone in comparison to others who received dobutamine, dopamine or SNP along with Prazosin. This could be due to the protective effect of Prazosin on the cardiovascular and the respiratory systems. Prazosin reverses both the inotropic and hypokinetic phases and reverses the metabolic effects which are caused by depressed insulin secretion (20). So, the early administration of Prazosin reduces the mortality which is associated with encephalopathy, which is due to the neutralization of the adverse effect of catecholamine which is released into the brain, as the catecholamines which are released outside the brain do not cross the blood- brain barrier.

Conclusion

Scorpion sting envenomation is an acute life threatening emergency in children and timely referral and early therapy with Prazosin may be life saving. The presence of metabolic acidosis, myocarditis, encephalopathy and acute pulmonary oedema are important determinants of the mortality and morbidity in children. Treatment with steroids and antihistaminics before admission was associated with a poor outcome.

Oral Prazosin is fast acting, easily available, cheap, free from any anaphylaxis and highly effective. Early intervention with oral Prazosin and the appropriate use of dobutamine and SNP can hasten the recovery in the scorpion sting victim.

References

1.
Santhanakrishnan BR, Ranganathan G, Ananthasubramanian P. Cardiovascular manifestations of scorpion stings in children. Indian Pediatr 1977; 14: 353-356.
2.
Mahadevan S. Scorpion sting. Indian Pediatr 2000; 37: 504-513.
3.
Ismail M. The scorpion-envenoming syndrome. Toxicon 1995; 3: 825-858.
4.
Sofer S, Gueron M. Vasodilators and hypertensive encephalopathy following scorpion envenomation in children. Chest 1990; 97: 118-120.
5.
Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Cardiovascular manifestations of scorpion sting in India (Review of 34 children). Ann Trop Pediatr 1991; 11: 381-387.
6.
Santhanakrishnan BR, Balagopal Raju V. Management of scorpion sting in children. Trop Med Hyg 1974; 77: 133-135.
7.
Biswal N, Murmu Uday C, Mathai B, Balachander J, Srinivasan S. Management of scorpion sting envenomation. Pediatrics Today 1999; 2(4): 420-426.
8.
Murthy KRK, Vakil AE, Yeolekar RE. Insulin administration reverses the metabolic and echocardiographic changes in acute myocarditis which is induced by Indian red scorpion (B. tamulus) venom in experimental dogs. Ind Heart J 1990; 42: 35-37.
9.
Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Utility of scorpion antivenom vs Prazosin in the management of severe Mesobuthus tamulus (Indian red scorpion) envenoming at a rural setting. J Assoc Physicians India. 2007; 55: 14-21.
10.
Miller R, Awarn A, Maxwell BB, Masson DT. Sustained reduction of cardiac impedence and preload in congestive cardiac failure with antihypertensive Prazosin. New Engl J Med 1977; 297: 303-307.
11.
Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Scorpions sting: a review of 121 cases. J Wilderness Medicine 1991; 2: 164-174.
12.
Vasconcelos F, Lanchote VL, Bendhack LN, et al. Effects of voltagegated Na+ channel toxin from Tityus serrulatus venom on rat arterial blood pressure and plasma catecholamines. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005; 141: 85-92.
13.
Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Management of cardiovascular manifestations of poisoning by the Indian red scorpion (Mesobuthus tamulus). Br Heart J 1992; 68: 478-480.
14.
Biswal N, Bashir RA, Murmu Uday C, Mathai B, Balachander J, Srinivasan S. Outcome of scorpion sting envenomation after a protocol guided therapy. Indian J Pediatr 2006; 73: 577-582.
15.
Bosnak M, Levent YH, Ece A, Yildizdas D, Yolbas I, Kocamaz H, et al. Severe scorpion envenomation in children: management in the pediatric intensive care unit. Hum Exp Toxicol 2009; 28(11): 721-728.
16.
Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Prazosin in the management of cardiovascular manifestations of scorpion sting. Lancet 1986; 1: 510-511.
17.
Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Indian red scorpion envenomation. Indian J Pediatr 1998; 65: 383-391.
18.
Prasad R, Mishra OP, Pandey N, Singh TB. Scorpion sting envenomation in children: Factors affecting the outcome. Indian J Pediatr 2011; 78(5): 544-548.
19.
Graham RM, Hettinger WA. Drug therapy-Prazosin. New Engl J Med 1979; 300: 232-235.
20.
Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Vasodilators: Scorpion envenoming and the heart (An Indian experience). Toxicon 1994; 32: 1031-1040.

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1359

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com