Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 95151

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : August | Volume : 6 | Issue : 6 | Page : 1029 - 1033 Full Version

Evaluation of Dryness of Eyes after Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery with Corneoscleral Tunnel Incision


Published: August 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2304
Kavitha Chikkanayakanahalli Venugopal, Pavana Acharya Krishnaraj, Chandan N.

1. Professor and HOD, Department of Ophthalmology,HIMS, Hassan. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, HIMS, Hassan. 3. Intern, MIMS, Mandya.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kavitha Chikkanayakanahalli Venugopal
No.41, Doctor’s quaters, S.C. Hospital Campus, HIMS,
Hassan, Karnataka - 573201, India.
Phone: 09448064116
E-mail: kavithacv_mys@yahoo.com

Abstract

Context: Damage to any component of the lacrimal function unit can destabilize the tear film and it can lead to ocular surface disease that expresses itself as dry eye. Many factors can cause dry eyes in patients after cataract surgeries, which increases their agony. In a developing country like ours, the most common, efficient and economical cataract surgery is the manual small incision cataract surgery which is done with a corneoscleral tunnel incision. The study population was from a region where agriculture was a predominant occupation. The environmental exposure to wind, sunlight and a high temperature causes dry eyes, which can be aggravated after cataract surgeries.

Aims: To evaluate the presence or absence of dry eyes, if present and to assess the severity of the dry eyes after manual small incision cataract surgery with a corneoscleral tunnel incision.

Settings and Design: A descriptive, cross-sectional study.

Material and Methods: 68 out of 71 patients who came for follow up after manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions were examined and analyzed. The symptoms, marginal tear strip height, Schirmer’s test-1and the tear film break-up time were recorded. The observations were analyzed and the dryness of the eyes, when it was present, was graded according to the DEWS 2007 report. Statistical Analysis: Percentage.

Results: 66.2% patients had dry eyes. Among them, 53.32% had mild grade, 26.6% had moderate grade and 20% had a severe grade of dryness. 33.8% patients did not have dry eyes. 67.7% of the male patients and 64.9% of the female patients had dry eyes. This gender difference was statistically not significant (p value–0.3922). 68.4% of the patients with a superior incision and 63.3% of the patients with a temporal incision had dry eyes. This difference in the incision site was also statistically not significant ( p value–0.9741). 60% of the patients in the early post-operative period and 75% of the patients in the late post-operative period had dry eyes. This difference was also statistically not significant (p value–0.1019).

Conclusion: After manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions, there was dryness of eyes in a majority of the patients and a majority of them had the mild grade of dry eyes.

Keywords

Dry eyes, Small Incision cataract Surgery, Corneoscleral Tunnel Incision

Introduction
“Dry eye is a multifactorial disease of the tears and the ocular surface, that results in symptoms of discomfort, visual disturbance, and tear film instability, with potential damage to the ocular surface. It is accompanied by an increased osmolarity of the tear film and inflammation of the ocular surface (1).” The causes of dry eyes are abnormalities of the tear film itself, like aqueous tear deficiency, mucin deficiency, lipid abnormalities and lid surfacing abnormalities, or epitheliopathies. Dry eye is thought to be a disturbance of the Lacrimal Functional Unit (LFU), an integrated system which comprises of the lacrimal glands, the ocular surface lids, and the sensory and the motor nerves that connect them (2). A disease in or a damage to any component of the LFU can destabilize the tear film and this can lead to ocular surface disease that expresses itself as dry eye. The epithelial injury which is caused by dry eye stimulates the corneal nerve endings, leading to symptoms of discomfort, increased blinking and, potentially, compensatory reflex lacrimal tear secretion. Eventually, the chronic surface damage of the dry eyes leads to a fall in the corneal sensitivity and in a reduction of the reflex tear secretion. Various aetiologies which may cause a reduced sensory reflex drive could be refractive surgery (LASIK for dry eye), contact lens wear and the chronic abuse of topical anaesthetics. Any irregularity of the otherwise smooth and uninterrupted ocular surface leads to dry eye by causing instability of the tear film and thereby, break up of the tear film quickly before the next blink. One or more of these causative factors can be involved in the pathogenesis of dry eye in patients post-cataract surgery (3). In a developing countries like ours , the most efficient and the economical means of doing a cataract surgery is manual small incision cataract surgery with a corneoscleral tunnel incision. Now-a-days, even the base camp surgeries which are done under the National Program for Control of Blindness (NPCB) are manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions. The study population was from a region with a predominant agricultural occupation. The environmental exposure to wind, sunlight and high temperature predisposes to dry eyes, which can be aggravated after cataract surgeries. So, we felt that there was a need to evaluate the dryness of theeyes which manifests after the manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions.

Material and Methods

We conducted a descriptive cross sectional study with purposive sampling in 71 eyes after getting the approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC). The patients who came for follow up were randomly picked up and a written informed consent was taken from them in their languages (Kannada) or English, in the presence of eye witnesses. A case study proforma was designed for each patient and the data was collected. Demographic information like name, age, sex, address of the patient and in patient (I.P) and out patient (O.P.) numbers were collected.The information on the date of the surgery, the post-operative duration and the eye which was operated on, were obtained. The symptoms which were relevant to the dry eyes were noted, wherever necessary the symptoms were elicited on furthur questioning. Slit lamp examination, marginal tear strip height, Schirmer’s test-I and tear film break-up time were evaluated in this order. The data were collected from the patients who came for follow up, following manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions, to the Out Patients Department (OPD), Department of Ophthalmology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya from May 24, 2010 to July 24, 2010.

T he following data were collected in this order: 1. The patients’ symptoms were thoroughly evaluated and recorded and the symptoms which were relevant to the dry eyes were analyzed. 2. The marginal tear strip height was recorded by using a slit lamp. 3. The Schirmer’s test-I was done and the readings of all the patients were noted and analyzed. It was done to assess the basal and the reflex secretions of the tears. It was done by placing the Schirmer’s strip, which is made up of the Whatman no. 41 filter paper with its dimensions, 5mm x 35mm. The initial 5mm of the Schirmer’s strip was folded and kept in the junction of the lateral one third and the medial two third of the lower fornix of the operated eye and it was kept insitu for 5 minutes. The wetting of the strip at the end of 5 minutes was noted by using the scale which was present on the strip. 4. The tear film break-up time assessment was done and the readings were analyzed. It was done to assess the stability of the pre-corneal tear film i.e., the mucin component of the tear film. First, the tear film was stained by using sterile fluorescein strips. Under a slit lamp, the time interval between the appearance of a dark spot on the cornea after a complete blink and the next blink was noted by using a stop watch. All the above tests were done on each patient and the data were graded, based on the guidelines of the 2007 Report of The International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) (1). The grading was done as has been shown in (Table/Fig 1).

We considered the discomfort, severity and the frequency of the symptoms, the tear film break-up time and the Schirmer’s test-I score from the classification and the final grading was done by adding the scores of the three mentioned tests, as has been shown in (Table/Fig 2). The assessment period was divided into two categories. The immediate post-operative period ie., the 2nd week to the 6th week and the late post-operative period ie., 6 weeks to 2 years. We included all the patients who underwent uneventful and uncomplicated manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions.

We excluded the patients with surgical complications, pre-existing dry eyes, Sjogren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune disorders and patients with pre-existing ocular diseases like glaucoma, uveitis, disorders of the lid or the nasolacrimal pathway, ocular allergies, pterygium and previous ocular surgeries. This was a descriptive, cross sectional study with purposive sampling in 71 eyes, which had undergone manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions. Percentage was used as a parameter for the assessment. This study was done after getting the approval of the institutional ethical committee.

Results

The study population was from the Mandya district in south Karnataka, an area which has agriculture as a predominant occupation. The data of 71 patients were collected according to the case study form. 3 patients were operated for developmental cataracts and they were below 20 years of age. The rest of the 68 patients were in the age group of 40-80 years. We considered the data of these 68 patients for analysis. The symptomatology analysis showed that of the 68 patients, 20 patients had complained of symptoms which were related to dry eyes and that the rest of the 48 patients had no symptoms which were related to dry eyes. The Schirmer’s test-I analysis showed that the lowest value of the Schirmer’s test-I was 1mm and that the highest was 35mm. (Table/Fig 3). The tear film break-up time analysis showed that the tear film break-up time ranged from a minimum of the immediate breakup of the tear film to a maximum of 23 seconds (Table/Fig 4).

The marginal tear strip height analysis showed that all the patients had a marginal tear strip height between 0.5mm to 1mm. So, it is not considered for grading. The comprehensive grading of the dryness showed that of the 68 patients, 45 (66.2%) patients had dry eyes and that 23 (33.8%) patients did not have any dry eyes. (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6), (Table/Fig 7). The gender comparision of the dryness of the eyes showed that 31 patients were males and that 37 patients were females. The p value was 0.3922 (Table/Fig 8), (Table/Fig 9). The incision site comparison of the dryness of the eyes showed that of the 68 patients, 38 patients had a superior incision and that 30 patients had a temporal incision during the cataract surgery, the p-value being 0.9749 (Table/Fig 10), (Table/Fig 11).

The comparison of the dryness of the eyes based on the post- operative duration (POD) showed that of the 68 patients who came for follow up, 40 patients were in the early post-operative period (ie., 2 to 6 weeks after the cataract surgery) and that 28 patients were in late post-operative period (6 weeks to 2 years after the cataract surgery). The p-value was 0.01019 (Table/Fig 12), (Table/Fig 13).

Discussion

This study was done to evaluate the dryness of the eyes after manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions.The dry eye sensation frequently occurs after cataract surgeries. The aetiology of the dry eyes following cataract surgeries may be due to any of these mechanisms (4): 1. The chronic use of eye drops after cataract surgeries can lead to toxic changes in the cornea and the conjunctiva due to the presence of preservatives in them, especially benzylkonium chloride (4),(5),(6). 2. The tear film instability in the operated eyes can result either from a surface irregularity at the site of the incision, which causes the tear film to break up faster than usual, or the mucin production from the conjunctiva may be decreased. 3. The exposure to light from the operating microscope might also be associated with post-operative dry eyes (4). 4. The decreased corneal sensation disrupts the cornea lacrimal gland loop, resulting in reduced tear secretion (7). The corneal sensation is the function of the long ciliary nerves and these long ciliary nerves enter the limbus predominantly at the 9 o’ clock and the 3 o’clock positions (7),(8). The incision wound can result in severing of the corneal nerves as a result of the corneal section, which causes a decreased corneal sensation. 5. The environmental exposure to excessive wind, sunlight and a high temperature increases the dry eye status (9). In our study, we found that after manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions, 66.2% of the patients had dry eyes, which was relatively high. Among the patients who had dryness of the eyes, a majority (53.33%) had mild grade, 26.66% had moderate grade and 20% had the severe grade of dryness. The findings of the analysis of the symptoms, the Schirmer’s test and the tear film break-up time were consistent with those of a study which was conducted by Srinivasan R et al., in which the tear film break-up time was reduced in pseudophakic eyes after phacoemulsification (10). This indicated that there was a tear film instability in the operated eyes. It could result from a surfaceirregularity at the site of the incision or from the decreased mucin production from the conjunctiva, as has been mentioned above. Significantly reduced tear film break-up times and Schirmer’s test-I scores were found on the post-operative day 30 in a study which was done by Liu Z et al., (11). In our study also, we found that the dry eyes were more prevalent in the late post-operative period, but the difference was not statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.1019. When we compared the dryness between the incision sites, we found that it was marginally more in the superior incisions than in the temporal incisions, but it was statistically insignificant, with p- value of 0.9749. This was in agreement with the findings of a study which was done by Cho KY et al., (12).

We expected that there would be more reduction in the dry eye test values in the temporal incision group because we assumed that there would be a greater decrease in the sensation ‘due to cutting’ of the large trunks of the corneal nerves which entered the limbus predominantly at the 9 o’ clock and the 3 o’clock positions. But there was a lesser incidence of the dry eyes in the temporal incisions in our study. When we compared the dryness of the eyes post-operatively in males and females, we found that the dryness in the female patients was less than that in the malepatients and this difference was not statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.3922. Most of the studies have reported a higher prevalence of the dry eyes in females than in males in the general population (9),(13),(14). But our study showed a marginal increase in the dryness post-operatively in males. This could probably be because of the more exposure to sunlight, high temperature and excessive wind (15). This region being a predominant agricultural area and males being more involved in agricultural work, the dryness could be more prevalent in males.

As in our study, we found that after manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions there was dryness of the eyes in 66.2% of the patients, we included medications to treat these dry eyes as a routine in our preoperative and post operative medication regimens. Calvin W Roberts et al., (16) showed that the administration of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% twice daily for one month prior to the cataract extraction and one month following the surgery could reduce the occurrence of dry eyes after a cataract surgery. Eric D Donnenfeld MD et al., (17) says that with the use of multifocal IOLs, the problems which are related to dry eyes are magnified by the inherent decrease in thecontrast sensitivity with this lens type and that because of this, he prescribes transiently preserved tears substitutes four times a day. Improving the visual acuity and the quality of the vision starts with optimizing of the tear film. There were some limitations in our study, as the pre-operative readings of the symptoms and the dry eye test values were not recorded. So, we could not correlate the pre-operative and the post-operative status following the manual small incision cataract surgery with corneoscleral tunnel incisions. This requires further studies.

Conclusion

After manual small incision cataract surgeries with corneoscleral tunnel incisions, there was dryness of the eyes in more number of patients and a majority of them had mild grade of dry eyes.

References

1.
2007 Report of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (DEWS). Ocular Surface 2007;5:75.
2.
Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, Goa J, Mirchoff AK, Pfluqfelder SC. The pathology of the dry eye and the interaction between the ocular surface and the lacrimal glands. Cornea. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997:663-86.
3.
Fernando Murrilo LSCP, Jay H.Krachmer MJMEJH. Dry eye. Cornea. St. Louis:Mosby; 1997:663-86.
4.
Hiroko BM, Steinert RF. Cataract surgery in the presence of other ocular comorbidities; Cataract Surgery: technique, complications and management. Saunders; 2004.:chap. 32.
5.
Zabel RW, Mintsioulis G, MacDonald IM, Valberg J, Tuft SJ. The corneal toxic changes after a cataract extraction. Can J Ophthalmol 1989;24:311-16.
6.
Walker TD. Benzalkonium toxicity. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004;32:657.
7.
Donnenfeld ED, Solomon K, Perry HD, Doschi SJ, Ehrenhaus M, Solomon R, Biser S. The effect of the hinge position on the corneal sensation and the dry eye after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1023-9.
8.
Kohlhaas M. Corneal sensation after cataract surgery. J Cat Ref Surg 1998;24:1399-409.
9.
Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The prevalence of and the risk factors of the dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1264-8.
10.
Srinivasan R, Agarwal V, Suchismitha T, Kavitha. Dry eye after phacoemulsification. AIOC 2008:116-8.
11.
Liu Z, Luo L, Zhang Z, Cheng B, Zheng D, Chen W, et al. Tear film changes after phacoemulsification. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2002; 38:274-7.
12.
Cho YK, Kim MS. Dry eye after cataract surgey and the associated intra-operative risk factors. Korean J Ophthalmol 2009; 23:65-73.
13.
Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Fukui Y, Hamana T, Ri M, Araki K, et al. Prevalence of dry eye in Japanese eye centers. Graefes Arch Cli Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:555-8.
14.
Versura P, Celluni M, Torreggiani A, Profazio V, Bernabini B, Caramazza R. The dryness symptoms, the diagnostic protocol and the therapeutic management: A report on 1,200 patients. Ophthalmic Res 2001; 33:221-7.
15.
Sahai A, Malik P. Dry eye: prevalence and attributable risk factors in a hospital based population. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:87-91.
16.
Roberts CW, Elie ER. Dry eye symptoms following cataract surgery. Insight 2007; 32(1):14-21.
17.
Donnenfeld ED. Dry eyes and premium IOLs ;The health of the ocular surface is important for the success of the lens technology. Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today March 2008:33-36.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4461:2304

Financial OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS:
None.

Date of Submission: May 02, 2012
Date of Peer Review: May 21, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jun 25, 2012
Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com