Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 24584

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : August | Volume : 6 | Issue : 6 | Page : 982 - 986 Full Version

Knowledge Risk Perceptions and Attitudes of Nurses Towards HIV in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mangalore, India


Published: August 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2305
Basavaprabhu Achappa, Soundarya Mahalingam, Priyansha Multani, Pranathi M, Deepak Madi, Unnikrishnan B, John T Ramapuram, Satish Rao

1. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, 2. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, 3. Post Graduate, Department of Ophthalmology, 4. Intern, Department of General Medicine, 5. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, 6. Professor & HOD, Department of Community Medicine, 7. Professor, Department of General Medicine, 8. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Affiliated to Manipal University, Unit of Manipal University, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Soundarya Mahalingam
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics,
Kasturba Medical College,Attavar, Mangalore, India.
Phone: +919845526499
E-mail: soundarya29@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Infectious diseases like HIV are on the rise in developing countries like India, which puts a heavy burden on the health care needs. Nurses have a key role and they spend considerable time taking care of the HIV positive patients who are admitted to hospitals. Hence, a study was conducted in our hospital to have an insight into the knowledge of nurses about HIV, their apprehensions while taking care of such patients and their attitudes and willingness to take care of them.

Methods: This was a cross sectional study which was done among 200 nurses of KMC Hospital, Mangalore. They were given a validated questionnaire which comprised of 67 items which included the knowledge on the spread of HIV, universal precautions, risk perceptions and their attitudes towards the HIV positive patients. Their responses were analyzed by using the SPSS software.

Results: Of the 200 nurses who were selected, 152 completed the questionnaire. Regarding the knowledge of the HIV transmission, the correct response for the widely advertised modes of transmission were higher-sexual contact (97.4%) and vertical transmission (88.8%). However, 11.2% did not know about the mother to child transmission and 28.9% did not know about the transmission through breast feeding. 90.1% felt that HIV could be transmitted by the sharing of plates and 83.6% felt that it could be transmitted through mosquito bites. 93.4% knew about the universal precautions and 78.3% routinely practised it. 80.3% were aware of the post exposure prophylaxis.79.2% described that caring for the HIV positives was rewarding, 86.5% were willing to assist in the operations on HIV patients and 84.9% were willing conduct deliveries. 13.4% felt they had a right to refuse care for the HIV patients and 97% felt that the surgical patients needed to be routinely tested for HIV.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that there were deficiencies in the knowledge about HIV and that false beliefs existed among the nurses about the spread of HIV. There is a need to improve the awareness about HIV and HIV patient care through training programmes to clear the misconceptions among the nurses so that the HIV positive patients are not discriminated against and are treated without discrimination.

Keywords

Nurses, HIV, Risk perceptions

Introduction
The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) which belongs to the family of retroviruses, is the causative agent of AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). HIV dismantles the immune system of the body by attacking the T- Helper cells and thus preventing the stimulation of the B cells which produce antibodies. HIV was first identified in India among commercial sex workers in Chennai in 1986 (1). Now, the HIV infection is present in all the states and territories of India. A high prevalence of HIV is present in the southern states due to sexual transmission and in the north eastern states where IV drug abuse is common. The high prevalence of HIV in the low socio economic groups is due to the internal migration of large groups of men (truck drivers, miners and military personnel), civil unrest, drug abuse, a high prevalence of STDs and low literacy rates, gender inequality and poverty (2). It has been forecasted to affect even a larger population in India in the coming decade and it is steadily percolating into the general population from the high risk groups. The HIV data of NACO 2006 showed that the overall prevalence of the HIV positive adults was approximately 0.36% and that the prevalence of the HIV positive adults in Karnataka was 0.81%, which was higher than the national average. Karnataka contributes upto 11% of the people I nfectious Sectionwho live with HIV/AIDS in India (3). With a sudden rise in the HIV infection, especially in the economically productive age groups, the health care system has been confronted with the challenging and complex task of taking care of these patients. HIV has created its own emotional stresses for the health care sector. The negative attitudes of nurses toward the HIV positive patients occur because of the occurrence of high mortality which is associated with the disease and the stigmatization of the persons with AIDS (4). This will have a negative bearing on the quality of the health care which is offered to these patients (5). Several studies have shown that a better knowledge about HIV among the health care workers reduced the anxiety about the care of the HIV positive patients. This study was conducted to assess the knowledge about HIV/AIDS, the risk perceptions and the attitudes of nurses who are the primary care givers towards the HIV patients, about which only limited information was available from this region. The hypothesis for the study was that nurses had negative attitudes towards the care for HIV patients and also, they had a high risk perception of acquiring HIV by caring for the patients with HIV, as was shown by previous studies. So, this study was done to assess the same at our centre.

Material and Methods

Study Setting:
This study was conducted at Kasturba Medical College Hospital, Attavar, Mangalore, amongst the nursing staff of the hospital. The approval of the institutional ethics committee was obtained before the commencement of the study.

Study Design:
Cross-sectional study Sample size:
200 nurses. Inclusion criteria: All the nurses who worked in Attavar, hospital Exclusion criteria: All the nursing students and nurses who had not given their consent to participate in the study. Study Duration: 1 month Sampling: Non-randomised sampling Data collection:
The data was collected by using a pre-tested, validated, semi-structured, anonymous questionnaire. It was a self administered, written questionnaire which comprised of 67 items, which was distributed amongst the nurses who worked in the hospital during a time period of 3-4 weeks. The questionnaire was pilot tested amongst 10 members of the nursing staff with respect to its clarity, comprehensibility and cultural appropriateness to this institutional set up.

The questionnaire is divided into 4 main sections and the required information was collected under the following broad categories. 1. Demographic variables. 2. Knowledge of the spread of HIV and of the awareness of the terms ‘universal basic precautions’ and ‘post exposure prophylaxis’. 3. Attitudes of the nurses towards the HIV positive patients, including some questions on the ethical and moral issues which were associated with the subject. 4. The risk perception of catching HIV amongst the nurses. The responses to the questions about their knowledge on the transmission of the virus and the awareness of the terms ‘universal basic precautions’ and ‘post exposure prophylaxis’ were three in number and the respondents were requested to encircle their response across the respective item, as ‘Yes’, ‘No’, or ‘Not sure’.

The responses to other questions regarding the attitudes and the perceptions that were chosen were of a Likert scale type, comprising of 5 options which ranged from ‘strongly agree’ at one end of the spectrum to ‘strongly disagree’ at the other end. For the other questions, the respondents were requested to tick their response/s among the options which were provided.

Data analysis:
The data which was collected was entered into a computer in MS Excel and the analysis was done by using SPSS, version II. The Chi square test was done and a p value of < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

Demographics:
Of the 200 study subjects who were selected, 152 gave their consent and completed the questionnaire. A majority of the subjects were females (96.1%)(Table/Fig 1). The qualifications of the participants in the study were B Sc nursing (16.4%), diploma in nursing (17.1%), general nursing and midwifery (62.5%) and B Sc nursing students (3.9%). Most of the subjects had a previous experience of working with the HIV positive patients (84.2%).

Knowledge on the HIV transmission:
The question numbers 1 – 22 were specifically related to the knowledge on the mode of transmission of HIV. Among them, the correct responses for the widely advertised modes of transmission were relatively higher, eg: sexual contact (97.4%), vertical transmission(88.8%), breast feeding (78.1%), blood transfusion (98.7%), sharing of needles (98.0%), needle stick injuries (96.7%) and contact through traumatized skin (86.2 %). However the % of the respondents who gave a correct about the knowledge of the transmission of HIV by piercing the ears and nose (50.7%), by contact with the conjunctival mucosa(47.4%), by contact with the oral mucosa (47.4%) and a higher risk of transmission with a hollow needle (10.5%), were relatively less. The number of respondents who gave correct responses regarding the statements which judged their knowledge about the modes which are wrongly perceived to spread HIV was less than heartening. The percentage of the respondents who identified the correct response for the sharing of plates was 90.1% , for urine, it was 62.5% , for mosquito bites, it was 83.6 %, for coughing, it was 82.2 %, for faecal matter, it was 65.5%, for saliva and tears, it was 48.7%, for toilet seats, it was 84.2% and for sputum, it was 50.7%. There were gaps in the knowledge regarding the basics of the transmission of HIV and these misconceptions led to a bias in giving care to the patients (Table/Fig 2).

Knowledge on the use of the universal precaution:
Universal precautions (UP) have been introduced to minimize the risk of transmission and to protect the caregiver. The knowledge on this can lead to a deficiency in the patient care and neglect. The respondents of our questionnaire had heard of UP (93.4%) and they knew that it applied to all the patients and not just to the care of the HIV positive patients (85.5%). 78.3% routinely used gloves, mask and PPE. 80.3% insisted on using goggles and aprons if the patient was positive for HIV.

Post exposure prophylaxis:
Only a dismal 80.3% were aware of PEP. This was alarming because it is expected of health care workers to be educated in this regards. Since this study incorporated only trained HCWs, it was expected that each and every person on the staff were aware about seeking help and knowing that measures existed, which could be employed following occupational exposure. 79.6% respondents were rightly aware that PEP reduced the risk of the transmission if it was taken immediately. 85.5% of the HCWs feltthat their knowledge was adequate and 86.8% felt that there was always room for improvements and for learning new advances. It is always easier to work in a hospital or a health care setting where clear guidelines exist regarding the care of the HIV patients and the precautions which have to be observed. 75.5% of the respondents suggested that the difficulties which were faced by theHCWs should be addressed regularly by the hospital in form of periodic meetings.

ATTITUDE OF NURSES:
The attitude of the nurses in caring for the HIV patients was positive, as 79.2% described it as a rewarding experience. 86.5% are willing to assist in the operations on HIV patients, 84.9% were willing to assist in the delivery of the HIV positive mothers and 85.5% believed that as nurses, they could remove the wrong ideas and beliefs regarding the spread of HIV. 89.5% agreed that there was a need to take more precautions for the patients with HIV/AIDS. 61.2% believed that the service promotions of nurses would help in improving the quality of the care and 39. 5% felt that increments and incentives were required for the nurses to improve the quality of the care. 32.9% of the nurses were worried about themselves while caring for HIV patients and 13.4% believed that the health personnel should have the right to refuse care to such patients. A very significant number (80.5%) thought that it was appropriate to disclose the HIV status of the patients to their relatives and their sexual partners without their consent. This point had to be addressed and clearly instructed regarding the legality of this issue and regarding the professional secrecy and ethics. 48.3% felt that the patients who got infected with HIV because of immoral practices deserved the disease and 42.1% felt that their fear of getting infected with HIV was justified. 21.7% said that they would discourage youngsters from joining nursing as they had a risk of getting infected with HIV. 61.2% thought that social support was adequate for the patients. 53.6% felt that the HIV positives needed to be nursed separately. 97.4% feel that the surgical patients needed to be routinely tested for HIV. 87.3 felt that all the patients needed to be routinely tested for HIV. 46.1% felt the need for separate wards for the HIV patients (Table/Fig 3).

RISK PERCEPTIONS AMONGNURSES:
90.4% felt that they were faced with a high risk of being infected with blood borne viruses. 44.7% were worried about getting infected with HIV/AIDS than other BBV. 66.4% were worried about getting infected with other diseases like TB (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

The response rate in this study was 76%, which is similar to that of other studies which were related to the knowledge, attitudes and risk perceptions about HIV/AIDS (6). It is of concern that 11.2% didn’t know about the mother to child transmission and that 28.9% didn’t know about the transmission through breast feeding. The knowledge on the fact that sexual contact with an HIV infected person could result in the transmission of HIV was high (97.4% answered correctly ) in our study group, which was much higher as compared to that in a study which was done by Bhosale et al., (13) , which showed that only 68% of the subjects knew that sexual contact was a mode of HIV transmission. Also, the knowledge on HIV transmission was poor in a study which was done by Eman Taher et al., (14) in Egypt, which showed that more than 26% and 9% of the undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students respectively did not know about the sexual mode of transmission of HIV. A very large population of nurses believed that HIV could be transmitted by sharing plates, through contact with urine, faeces, saliva tears and sputum of the HIV patients and through mosquito bites and toilet seats. This result was comparable to that of a study which was done in rural India.

(2). This indicated huge gaps in the knowledge on the ransmission of HIV and on the dire need for training of nurses in this regards. The modes that are wrongly perceived to transmit HIV can only increase the discrimination and deprive the patients of proper care. By increasing the knowledge on the mother to child transmission perinatally and via breast feeding among the nurses, the quality of the patient care can be substantially increased and appropriate advice to the mothers and also the good health of the babies can be ensured. Only 10.5 % knew that the risk of the spread of HIV through a hollow needle was more than that which was possible through a solid needle. A shocking 85.5% of the nurses thought that the Universal Precautions wereapplicable only for treating the HIV patients and only 93.4% had heard of the Universal Precautions. Most of the nurses felt that all the patients needed to be routinely tested for HIV. But it has to be noted that the testing for HIV was more expensive than using the Universal Precautions (7), and 80.3% were aware of the term ‘PEP’. Also, a large proportion wanted to improve their knowledge about HIV and they felt that the difficulties that they faced in this regards should be addressed by the hospital. A very large proportion said that caring for HIV was rewarding and that the willingness to care and assist in surgeries for HIV positive patients was higher than that which was observed other studies (2), (8), (9),(15). A study which was done by Adetoyeje Oyeyemi et al., (16) in Nigeria, showed that nurses had a poor attitude and willingness to care for the HIV patients as compared to that which was found in our study. Only 5.4% said they would not prefer to care for the HIV positive patients and 13.4% said they should had the right to refuse care to the HIV positive patients, which is much lower than that which was found in other studies (2),(8),(10). The willingness to care for the HIV positive patients was proportional to the previous work experience with HIV positive care (2),(11),(12). Service promotions seemed to be a boosting factor. 90.8% felt that all the patients should be taken care of with compassion and skill, irrespective of their status. In spite of the high proportion of willingness in caring for the HIV patients, negative attitudes took the upper hand when it came to the testing for HIV without consent and disclosure of the patient’s status without the consent of the patient. More than half the subjects felt that the HIV positive patients needed to be nursed separately from other patients. Also, there was a strong resentment towards these patients, as most them thought that they behaved immorally and exhibited certain behavioural characteristics and that they deserved such a disease. Considering the fact that a maximum percentage of the HIV positive patients had contracted it as a sexually transmitted disease and the taboo which was associated with it in an outwardly morally rigid society did influence the opinion of a caregiver. 48% of the respondents believed that the patients deserved the disease and this led to a prejudice in the patient care.

A very high proportion (91%) of the nursing personnel in our study believed that they were at a high risk of contracting HIV by nursing the HIV patients and 21.7% went to the extent of saying that they would discourage young people from pursuing nursing as a career. There was clearly an exaggeration of the fear of contracting HIV, since the respondents were trained personnel who were educated extensively with regards to the Universal Precautions, post prophylaxis. It is true that every Health Care Worker is in more danger of acquiring HIV as a professional hazard and studies like ours are giving proof that such fears need to be addressed by counselors or an HIV cell. The prejudice ofthe caregiver needs to be addressed for the nursing standards to improve.

References

1.
Simoes Eric AF, George BP, Jacob JT, Solomon NS, Lakshminarayanan S, et al., Evidence of the HTLV-III infection in prostitutes in Tamil Nadu (India). Indian J Med Res 1987; 85 : 335-8.
2.
Kermode M, Holmes W, Langkham B, Thomas MS, Gifford S. HIVrelated knowledge, attitudes, and risk perceptions amongst nurses, doctors, and other healthcare providers in rural India. Indian J Med Res. 2005; 122: 258 – 64.
3.
http//:www.nacoonline.org; HIV data 2006.
4.
Van Dyk AC 1992: AIDS: the health care challenge. Pretoria: Alteks.
5.
Baylor RA, McDaniel AM. Nurses attitudes towards the caring for patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Journal of Professional Nursing, 1996; 12(2):99-105.
6.
Islam MT, Mostafa G, Bhuiya AU, Hawkes S, De Francisco A. Knowledge on and the attitudes towards HIV/AIDS among the staff of an international organization in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2002 sep;20(3):271-8.
7.
Lawrence VA, Gafni A, Kroenke K. Pre-operative HIV testing: is it less expensive than the universal precautions? J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46 :1219-27.
8.
Datta C, Bandyopadhyay D. Knowledge and attitudes in relation to HIV/AIDS among the in-service nurses of Calcutta. J Indian Med Assoc 1997; 95 : 75-7.
9.
Fusilier MR, Durlabhji S. The health care workers’ attitudes towards AIDS and their willingness to provide care in India. J Health Hum Serv Adm 1997; 20 : 145-58.
10.
Lal P, Kumar A, Ingle GK, Gulati N. Some AIDS-related policy issues and the nursing students’ willingness to provide AIDS care. J Commun Dis 1998; 30 : 38-43.
11.
Takai A, Wongkhomthong S, Akabayashi A, Kai I, Ohi G, Naka K. Correlation between the history of contact with people who are living with HIV/AIDS (PWAs) and the tolerant attitudes towards HIV/AIDS and PWAs in rural Thailand. Int J STD AIDS 1998; 9 : 482-4.
12.
Paxton S. The impact of utilizing HIV-positive speakers in AIDS education. AIDS Educ Prev 2002; 14 : 282-94.
13.
Bhosale SB, Jadhav SL, Singru SA, Banerjee A. Behavioral surveillance survey regarding the human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome among high school and junior college students. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2010;76:33-7
14.
Taher E, Abdelhai R. Nurses knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards HIV/AIDS: Effects of a health education intervention on two nursing groups in Cairo University. Egypt Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, April 2011; 3(4):144-54.
15.
Delobelle P., Rawlinson J. L., Ntuli S., Malatsi I., Decock R,Depoorter A. M. HIV/AIDS knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions of rural nurses in South Africa. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2009; 65: 1061–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648..04973 x.
16.
Oyeyemi A., Oyeyemi B,Bello I. Caring for patients who are living with AIDS: the knowledge, attitude and the global level of comfort. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2006; 53: 196–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2648..03715 x.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com