Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 95070

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : August | Volume : 6 | Issue : 6 | Page : 999 - 1002 Full Version

The Changing Clinical Spectrum of Dengue Fever in the 2009 Epidemic in North India: A Tertiary Teaching Hospital Based Study


Published: August 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2311
Seema Awasthi, Vinod Kumar Singh, Santosh Kumar, Ashutosh Kumar, Shyamoli Dutta

1. Assistant Professor, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, U.P., India. 2. Assistant Professor, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, U.P., India. 3. Assistant Professor, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, U.P., India. 4. Assistant Professor, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, U.P., India. 5. Professor, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, U.P., India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Seema Awasthi M.D. (Pathology)
Assistant Professor
Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College, Moradabad, U.P., India.
Phone: 91-9838377779
E-mail: dr.seemaabhishek@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Dengue fever epidemics have been causing major concerns in India since the last two decades. Many parts of India, including the north regions, are now endemic for the Dengue infection. This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in north India to determine the changing trends of the clinical features in the Dengue patients of this region in the recent years.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of four months was conducted on 309 cases who presented with fever, who were suspected as Dengue fever cases and they were admitted in the study. A detailed history and the clinical examination findings were recorded and all the cases were subjected to laboratory investigations which included a complete haemogram, a liver function test, a kidney function test and serological tests. All the patients were treated symptomatically.

Result: Among the 309 suspected Dengue patients, the male: female ratio was 2:1. The Dengue serology was studied for all the cases and only 34 cases were found to be positive (male: female =1.6:1). On clinical examination, a maculo-papular erythematous rash was found to be present in 69% cases and petechiae were present in 38% of the cases. 8% of the cases showed a tendency for spontaneous bleeding. Among these 8% cases with a bleeding tendency, 9 interesting cases showed normal platelet counts and prothrombin times. Renal failure, an altered sensorium, pleural effusions and shock developed in 4, 1, 1 and 1 cases respectively. A platelet count of <1,00,000/cmm was found in 84% cases and 26% cases had a platelet count of less than 20,000/cmm, out of which 20% cases had platelet transfusion. The haemoglobin reduction was not significant in most of the cases and 57 % of the cases showed elevated liver enzymes. 21 cases (6.79%) showed hepatomegaly and splenomegaly was present in 28 cases (9.06%).

Conclusion: This study showed slight differences in the clinical profile and the course of illness as compared to the findings of previous studies from the same region, thus indicating a need for the early identification of the Dengue cases to prevent further complications and mortality in the future.

Keywords

Dengue fever, Altered sensorium, Macula-papular erythematous rashes

Introduction
Dengue fever has been known to be endemic in India for over two centuries as a benign and self-limited disease. In recent years, the disease has changed its course, manifesting in its severe form as DHF (Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever), with increasing frequencies (1). The Delhi city (India) is home to more than 13 million people and it is endemic for the DI (Dengue infection) (2). Overpopulation has consequently led to poor sanitary conditions and water logging at various places. Since 1997, Delhi, a city in north India, has experienced seven major epidemic outbreaks of the Dengue virus infection, with the last being reported in 2003 (3),(4). Since then, Dengue has been rampant in north India, also in the rural areas, probably due to the high population density and other factors (5). Besides the presence of an increased frequency of the Dengue infection in north India, the clinical profile is also very much varied. In 2009, the clinical manifestations which were shown by the patients were slightly different and they had not been observed commonly in the previous year’s epidemics from the same region. Through the present retrospective study, we are presenting the varied clinical manifestations of the Dengue patients who had been admitted in a tertiary teaching hospital in north India.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted over a period of 4 months, from August 2009 to November 2009, in a tertiary care teaching hospital which was situated in a rural part of north India. All the patients who presented with fever for two to seven days, which was accompanied by headache and vomiting, were suspected to have Dengue and they were included in the present study. A detailed history was taken and a careful clinical examination was performed on all the suspected cases. The laboratory investigations which were performed on a majority of the patients included haemoglobin (Hb), the total and the differential leucocyte counts (TLC and DLC), platelet count, haematocrit (Hct), liver function tests (LFT) which included serum albumin, serum protein and the prothrombin time and the renal function tests (KFT). The case definition of Dengue/ DHF/DSS (Dengue shock syndrome) which was followed in the present study was that which was recommended by the WHO (6) i.e. An acute febrile illness of two to seven days duration with two or more of the following manifestations-headache, retro-orbital pain, myalgia, arthralgia, vomiting, rash, haemorrhagic manifestations and leucopaenia. All the patients were treated symptomatically andthe serological test was performed on all the suspected cases. The SD BIOLINE Dengue NS1 Ag + Ab combo rapid card test kit consists of two devices; one for the detection of the Dengue NS1 antigen and the second for the differential detection of the Dengue IgG and IgM antibodies in the human serum/plasma. Out of the 309 patients, 208 were males and 101 patients were females. A majority of the patients were from the adult age group [>15 years (302 cases)] and few were from the paediatric age group [<15 years (7 cases)]. A majority of the patients were from the 15-44 years age group (213 cases) (Table/Fig 1). This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee.

Results

During the period of the study, one outbreak of the Dengue infection occurred and a total of 309 (M=208 and F= 101) patients were suspected to have the Dengue infection (Table/Fig 1). 95.5 % (295) cases were from the rural areas. Out of the 309 patients who were tested for the Dengue serology, only 34 cases were found to be positive for the Dengue virus by the rapid card test (NS1 Ag and IgG and IgM Ab) (males= 21 and females=13).

Distribution by Age
Out of the 34 serologically positive cases, 21 cases were males and 13 cases were females. Among the males, 11 cases were from the 15-44 years age group, 6 cases were from the 45-59 years age group, 2 cases were from the >60 years age group and 2 cases were from the paediatric age group (≤ 15 years) in this study. Among the females, 9 cases were from the 15-44 years age group and 4 cases were from the 45-59 years age group. Larger proportions of serologically positive cases were observed among the adults, with a positive prevalence of 94.11%. Dengue-specific antibody positive cases were mainly reported during the post monsoon period, with the maximum number of cases 160 (51.77%) being reported during the month of October, followed by 90 (29.12%) cases in November, 45 (14.56%) cases in September and 14 (4.53%) cases in August (Table/Fig 4).

Fever was the most common clinical presentation which was found among all the presenting patients (100%).The fever was of a mild to moderate degree in a majority of the patients and it had no specific pattern. The other main complaints besides fever were vomiting, nausea, rash, petechiae, itching, myalgia and upper abdominal pain (Table/Fig 2). On clinical examination, a maculo-papular erythematous rash was found to be present in 212 (69%) cases and petechiae were present in 118 (38%) of the cases. 25(8%) cases showed a tendency for spontaneous bleeding. The gastrointestinal tract was the most common site for the bleeding in 17 patients, followed by epistaxis (3 cases) and episodes of haemoptysis (5 cases). Among these 25 cases who had the bleeding tendencies, 9 interesting cases showed normal platelet counts and prothrombin time. Renal failure, an altered sensorium, pleural effusions and shock developed in 4, 1, 1 and 1 cases respectively.

A platelet count of <1,00,000/cmm was found in 261 (84%) cases and 81 (26%) cases had a platelet count of less than 20,000/cmm, out of which in 63 (20%) cases had platelet transfusion (Table/Fig 3). Haemoglobin was mildly reduced in most of the cases and 57% cases showed elevated liver enzymes. All the patients who were suspected to have the Dengue infection were admitted. The average duration of their hospital stay was10-14 days. The average duration of the fever was found to be 7-10 days. No mortality was reported during the study.

Discussion

Dengue is emerging as a major health problem in India. Since the first epidemic in 1963–64 in Kolkata, many places, including the rural areas of north India, have been experiencing regular outbreaks of the Dengue infection. In the present outbreak in our hospital, the Dengue cases showed varied clinical presentations which are different from those which were reported in previous epidemic cases. The epidemic of Dengue fever has been reported in every 2-3 year interval in north India. This (the 2009 outbreak) as well as the previous outbreaks in north India have usually shown a seasonal trend and they have been reported in the post monsoon season, which can be explained by the increased mosquito breeding due to the increased humidity and temperature during these days (8),(9). Our study, in accordance with the study which was conducted by Chakravarti A and Kumaria R, showed that a majority of the patients were diagnosed with the Dengue infection in the months of October and November than in August and September (Table/Fig 4).

Our study also showed a male preponderance, which was similar to the findings of other studies from India and this could be explained by the more outdoor activity of the males as compared to the females, which might have caused more mosquito bites (8),(10). In our study, only 34 patients were found to be serologically positive. This is mainly because diagnosing Dengue early is challenging, as the initial symptoms of the Dengue infection are often non-specific and as the serological tests, which are the mainstay of the current laboratory diagnosis, confirm Dengue late in the course of the illness (11). The early detection of DENV is not always possible due to the transient, low levels of the viraemia.

As regards to the clinical presentations, this epidemic showed only few differences from those of the previous outbreaks. A mild to moderate degree fever has been the most consistent finding in all the epidemics, which had an average duration of 5-7 days (6),(12),(13),(14). In our study also, fever was the most common presentation, but the average duration of the fever was longer (with an average of 10 days) than that in the previous reports.

Rashes, abdominal pain, myalgia, headache and vomiting constituted the main clinical manifestations, which were similar to that which were seen in other studies (13),(15). Our findings were in accordance with those of a study which was conducted in Pakistan, that showed that all the cases presented with fever (100%). Skin rashes appeared in 83.33% of the patients, 1−6 days after the onset of the fever (7). 25 cases presented with spontaneous bleeding and similar findings were reported by other studies also (16),(17). Among these bleeding cases, 9 interesting cases showed bleeding tendencies despite them having normal platelet counts and prothrombin times, probably due to the altered platelet function which is found in the Dengue infection. Some other studies have also reported similar results (18),(19),(20).

Although hepatomegaly was described as common clinical presentation of Dengue by the WHO, splenomegaly is not generally a feature of the Dengue infection. But in our study, 28 cases presented with mild to moderate splenomegaly. A recent report from Delhi also showed a higher percentage of splenomegaly in children (20). Earlier reports from the north as well as from other parts of India had not shown a high percentage of splenomegaly in the Dengue cases (4), (14), (15), (18),(21),(22),(23). Among the laboratory findings, a majority of the cases were found to show <1,00,000/cmm platelets (84%) (Table/Fig 3). Anaemia was not the major clinical feature, but 57% cases showed elevated liver enzymes. Elevation in the liver enzymes is well known in Dengue infections (24), (25), (26), (27), (28) but the WHO (6) has not listed liver enzyme elevation as a major criterion for the case definition of Dengue fever (Table/Fig 5).

In our study, the serological diagnosis of Dengue was based on the identification of either the Dengue NS1 Ag or the presence of the IgM and the IgG Abs or both; hence, only few cases showed serological positivity. However, in the present study, all the cases were clinically suspected to be Dengue fever and they responded accordingly. All the patients were treated symptomatically and all improved, with no mortality.

Conclusion

To conclude, the clinical profile of the Dengue fever cases is changing in different epidemics, even in the same regions as well as with the period of time. The present study thus indicated the need for a continuous sero-epidemiological surveillance for the early and definite identification of the clinical features of the Dengue infection, to prevent further complications, mortality and outbreaks in the future. This study has the limitations which are inherent to a hospital record based study and it should be supported by a larger, detailed study.

References

1.
Ramalingaswami V: Presentations to participants: The changing paradigms of Dengue. Dengue outbreak in Delhi: Round Table Conference Series: Ranbaxy Science Foundation; 1996; 7-9.
2.
Kabra SM, Verma IC, Arora NK, Jain Y, Kabra V. DHF in children in Delhi. Bull WHO 1992; 45:105-08.
3.
Dar L, Broor S, Sengupta S, Xess I, Seth P. The first major outbreak of the Dengue haemorrhagic fever in Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5: 589-90.
4.
Singh NP, Jhamb R, Agarwal SK, Gaiha M, Dewan R, Daga MK, et al. The 2003 outbreak of Dengue fever in Delhi, India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2005; 36: 1174-78.
5.
Tripathi P, Kumar R, Tripathi S, Tambe JJ, Venkatesh V. The descriptive epidemiology of Dengue transmission in Uttar Pradesh, India. Paediatr 2008; 45: 315-18.
6.
The World Health Organization. Dengue haemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control, 2nd edition. Geneva, 1998; 12-23.
7.
Mahboob A, Iqbal Z, Javed R, Taj A, Munir A, Akhtar SM. Clinical characteristics of the patients with Dengue fever: Report of 48 patients in 2010. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010; 22(4).
8.
Ratho RK, Mishra B, Kaur J, Kakkar N, Sharma K. An outbreak of Dengue fever in the peri urban slums of Chandigarh, India, with a special reference to the entomological and the climatic factors. Indian J Med Sci 2005; 59:519-27.
9.
Ram S, Khurana S, Kaushal V, Gupta R, Khurana SB. The incidence of Dengue fever in relation to the climatic factors in Ludhiana, Punjab. Indian J Med Res 1998; 108: 128-33.
10.
Vijayakumar TS, Chandy S, Sathish N, Abraham M, Abraham P, Sridharan G. Is Dengue emerging as a major public health problem? Indian J Med Res 2005; 121:100-07.
11.
Gubler DJ. Dengue and Dengue hemorrhagic fever. In: Guerrant RL, Walker DH, Weller PF, editors. Tropical Infectious Diseases: Principles, Pathogens and Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2006; 813-22.
12.
Kabilan L, Balasubramanian S, Keshava SM, Satyanarayana K. The 2001 Dengue epidemic in Chennai. Indian J Paediatr 2005; 72: 919-23.
13.
Kumar R, Tripathi P, Tripathi S, Kanodia A, Pant S, Venkatesh V. The prevalence and the clinical differentiation of Dengue fever in children in northern India. Infection 2008; 36: 444-49.
14.
Agarwal R, Kapoor S, Nagar R, Misra A, Tandon R, Mathur A, et al. A clinical study of the patients with Dengue haemorrhagic fever during the epidemic of 1996 at Lucknow, India. Southeast Asian J Trop. Med. Pub. Hlth 1999; 30: 735-40.
15.
Kishore J, Singh J, Dhole TN, Ayyagari A. A clinical and serological study of the first large epidemic of Dengue in and around Lucknow, India 2003. Dengue Bulletin. 2006; 30:72-79.
16.
Kabra SK, Jain Y, Pandey RM, Madhulika, Singhal T, Tripathi P, et al. Dengue haemorrhagic fever in children in the 1996 Delhi epidemic. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1999; 93:294-98.
17.
Srivastava VK, Suri S, Bhasin A, Srivastava L, Bharadwaj M. An epidemic of Dengue hemorrhagic fever and Dengue shock syndrome in Delhi: a clinical study. Ann Trop Paediatr 1990; 10: 329-34.
18.
Narayanan M, Aravind MA, Thilothammal N, Prema R, Sarqunam CS, Ramamurty N. A Dengue fever epidemic in Chennai- a study on the clinical profile and the outcome. Indian Paediatr 2002; 39: 1027-33.
19.
Gomber S, Ramachandran VG, Kumar S, Agarwal KN, Gupta P, Gupta P et al. Hematological observations as diagnostic markers in Dengue hemorrhagic fever –a reappraisal. Indian Paediatr 2001; 38: 477-81.
20.
Bethell DB, Gamble J, Pham PL, Nguyen MD, Tran TH, Ha TH et al. The non invasive measurement of the microvascular leakage in patients with Dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 243-53.
21.
Faridi MM, Aggarwal A, Kumar M, Sarafrazul A. The clinical and the biological profile of Dengue haemorrhagic fever in children in Delhi. Trop Doct 2008; 38: 28-30.
22.
Aggarwal A, Chandra J, Aneja S, Patwari AK, Dutta AK. An epidemic of Dengue hemorrhagic fever and Dengue shock syndrome in children in Delhi. Indian Paediatr 1998; 35: 727-32.
23.
Rategeri VH, Shepur TA, Wari PK, Chavan SC, Mujahid IB, Yergolkar PN. The clinical profile and the outcome of the Dengue fever cases. Indian Paediatr 2005; 72: 705-06.
24.
Larreal Y, Valero N, Estevez J, Reyes I, Maldonado M, Espina LM et al. Hepatic alterations in patients with Dengue. Invest Clin 2005; 46: 169-78.
25.
Kou CH, Tai DI, Chang-Chien CS, Lan CK, Chiou SS, Liaw YF. The liver biochemical tests and Dengue fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1992; 47: 265-70.
26.
Nguyen TL, Nguyen TH, Tieu NT. The impact of Dengue haemorrhagic fever on the liver function. Res Virol 1997; 48: 273-77.
27.
Souza LJ, Alvez JG, Nogueira RM, Gicovate NC, Bastos Da, Siqueira EW, et al. Aminotransferase changes and acute hepatitis in patients with Dengue fever: An analysis of 1,585 cases. Braz J Infect Dis 2004; 8: 156-63.
28.
Chakravarti A, Kumaria R. An eco-epidemiological analysis of the Dengue infection during an outbreak of Dengue fever in India. Virology Journal 2005; 2:32.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4458:2311

Financial OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS:
None.
Date of Submission: May 01, 2012
Date of Peer Review: May 28, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jun 23, 2012
Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com