Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53362

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : ZC16 - ZC20 Full Version

Efficacy of Neem and Cinnamon Extracts in Reducing Bacterial Contamination during Scaling: A Randomised Clinical Study


Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64913.18720
R M Vasanthi, Roshan R Rughwani, Priyanka K Cholan, Dhayanand John Victor, S Savithri

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
R M Vasanthi,
Plot No. 44A, 1st Main Road, Ashok Nagar, Mappedu, Chennai-600126, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: vasanthi.dentist@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasonic scaling involves the production of a high amount of aerosols, which combine with oral microbes and become a potential source of airborne contaminants. Chemical antimicrobial agents like Chlorhexidine (CHX) (the gold standard) are known to reduce microbial contamination in dental waterlines. However, natural extracts are gaining popularity as an economical yet effective means of reducing bacterial load.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of neem and cinnamon extracts in reducing bacterial contamination during scaling.

Materials and Methods: A single-centered, parallel multiple-arm, randomised clinical study was conducted at the Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from September 2019 to March 2020. Scaling was performed for patients in all four groups (n=128, 32 each group) - Water, 0.2% Chlorhexidine, Neem, and Cinnamon Extract. Two blood agar petri dishes were placed on either side of the patient at a distance of 40 cm from the patient’s head, and one blood agar petri dish was placed on the operator’s chest. The agar plates were then incubated aerobically for 48 hours for Colony Forming Units (CFU) count. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s posthoc test.

Results: Cinnamon showed a 25.2% reduction in CFUs, whereas neem showed an 11.7% reduction compared to distilled water. However, chlorhexidine had the maximum bacterial reduction. The agar plates at the chest position had the highest bacterial growth, while the left position had comparatively fewer microbial colonies.

Conclusion: Chlorhexidine exhibited the highest percentage of CFU reduction. However, when used as a Dental Unit Water Line (DUWL) coolant, herbal extracts such as cinnamon and neem caused a significant reduction in CFUs compared to distilled water, with cinnamon performing better than neem. Therefore, herbal extracts like neem and cinnamon can be considered cost-effective alternatives for minimising aerosol contamination in DUWL.

Keywords

Aerosol contamination, Dental unit water lines, Herbal extracts

Aerosol contamination is an inevitable event happening in dental clinics, regardless of advanced equipment being used in recent times. These aerosolised droplets formed during dental procedures remain suspended in the air for a considerable duration, and inhalation of such droplets aids in acute and chronic respiratory problems, which can be even fatal (1),(2). The hazards of such droplets have been proven in the recent pandemic Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) due to the presence and detectability of COVID-19 in infected patients’ saliva, which was alarming during an aerosol-generating dental treatment (3).

Dental waterline is known to harbour numerous microorganisms due to the stagnation of water. The bacterial load of such untreated Dental Unit Waterlines (DUWLs) can usually exceed 105 CFU/mL (4). Coolant from these pipelines can always be a source of aerosol contamination during cavity preparation and scaling (5). Antimicrobial coolants act on the innate microflora, thereby minimising the hazards of any aerosols produced during dental treatment.

Among several compounds, Chlorhexidine is a well-documented antimicrobial agent with a bacteriostatic action at low concentration and bactericidal at high concentration (6). However, herbal extracts such as neem, cinnamon, turmeric, aloevera, tulsi, clove, peppermint, green tea, and many more are gaining attention due to their phytochemical components, which can be antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory with negligible alcohol content, making them tissue-friendly (7).

A recent study comparing the efficacy of cinnamon, CHX with distilled water has revealed that herbal extracts can be a beneficial yet economical alternative to distilled water (8). Likewise, neem, being a wonder herb, is enriched with many potentially useful phytochemical ingredients that have both antibacterial and antiviral properties (9),(10). There is currently no scientific evidence to support the beneficial effects of neem in DUWL. Hence, the present study aims to compare the potential benefits that could be obtained by replacing the gold standard CHX with low-cost yet beneficial herbal extracts such as neem and cinnamon in minimising the bacterial load in aerosols produced during regular dental procedures.

Material and Methods

The current study was a single-centered, parallel multiple-arm randomised clinical study conducted in the Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from September 2019 to March 2020. Institutional Ethical Clearance was obtained (SRMU/M&HS/SRMDC/PG/009), and it was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI/2021/09/036416).

Participants were explained about the procedure. Verbal and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The recruited participants were systemically healthy and screened for the gingival index.

Inclusion criteria: Those with moderate to severe gingivitis (GI score of 1.5-3), having a minimum of 20 permanent teeth, and indicated for full-mouth scaling in a single visit were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with any systemic illness, smokers, pregnant women, and those who had undergone oral prophylaxis or antibiotic therapy in the last three months were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated based on n=Z2×Sd2/L2 {n-sample size, Z-Confidence Interval (1.96), Sd-Standard Deviation (74.803) (8), L-Level of Precision (5%)} as 128, with 32 participants per group, and the power of the study fixed at 80%.

Study Procedure

The patients were selected based on a simple random sampling method and were allocated into four groups. Group 1 received ultrasonic scaling with distilled water, Group 2 received ultrasonic scaling with 0.2% Chlorhexidine, Group 3 received ultrasonic scaling with cinnamon extract, and Group 4 received ultrasonic scaling using neem extract (Table/Fig 1).

Preparation of chlorhexidine: Lavage regularly after removal of the agar plates. A commercially available 0.2% CHX mouthwash was procured and dispensed in water in a 1:1 ratio prior to the beginning of the ultrasonic scaling.

Preparation of neem extract: Neem leaves (Azadirachta indica) were procured and authenticated by the botanist. The leaves were shadow dried for 14 days and then sent to the laboratory for preparation of the aqueous extract by the Soxhlet extraction method (11). The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of neem leaf extract was set at 500 μg/mL, and based on this, the final concentration of the aqueous neem extract was adjusted to 0.5 g/L (Table/Fig 2) (11).

Preparation of cinnamon extract: Commercially available cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) was purchased and authenticated 17by the botanist. The product was sent to the laboratory for preparation of the aqueous extract by the Soxhlet extraction method (12). The MIC of cinnamon extract was set at 4 mg/mL, and based on this, the final concentration of the aqueous cinnamon extract was adjusted to 4 g/L (Table/Fig 2) (12).

Method of performing the study: Ultrasonic scaling was performed for all the subjects who met the inclusion criteria in a closed dental clinic. Prior to the procedure, an agar plate was placed in the center of the closed operatory room where the scaling was supposed to be performed for 20 minutes. It was then sent for microbiological quality testing to determine adequate quality control and to ensure that the operatory was not contaminated with airborne pathogens. This agar plate was not sent for statistical analysis as it was meant for quality control purposes.

The patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups: Water/CHX/Neem/Cinnamon group. Prior to scaling, the fresh aqueous extracts were dispensed in the Dental Unit Waterlines (DUWLs) by adjusting the amount of water to be added to the concentrated extracts for the patients undergoing scaling in the neem and cinnamon group. Scaling was performed for a period of approximately 15 minutes using an ultrasonic scaler and suction during the procedure.

Use of agar plates: Commercially available 20% Sheep Blood agar plates (Himedia Inc. India) were used in the present study. Three agar plates were used for each subject - two agar plates were placed at a distance of 40 cm on either side of the patient’s head, and one agar plate was placed at the chest of the operator prior to the commencement of scaling (Table/Fig 3). After completion of the 15-minute procedure, the agar plates were sealed and transported to the microbiology laboratory. If oral prophylaxis was not completed within the 15 minutes, the procedure was carried out regularly after removal of the agar plates.

Microbial analysis: The agar plates were incubated in an aerobic chamber for a period of 48 hours. Colonies of bacteria were counted using a semi-digital colony counting device and denoted as the number of CFUs visualised on the agar plates (Table/Fig 4).

Statistical Analysis

The results were statistically analysed for the CFUs and the gingival index using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Released 2018). One-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the CFUs in different groups, whereas Tukey’s posthoc test was done for pair-wise comparison. Any data with a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The age and gingival index of the patients enrolled in the study for the four groups were comparable (p>0.05) as shown in (Table/Fig 5). (Table/Fig 6) shows the CFUs that were recorded in all four study groups in all three positions, along with the comparison of the difference in CFUs among the study groups. The lowest CFUs were found in the CHX group in the chest position. The difference was significant when compared with water and cinnamon (p-value <0.001). There were also significantly fewer CFUs in the cinnamon group compared to water and neem with p-values of <0.05 and <0.001, respectively. In the right position, the comparison between chlorhexidine and all the other groups showed a statistically significant difference with p-value <0.05. In the left position, there were significantly fewer CFUs in the CHX group compared to water and neem with a p-values of <0.001 and <0.001, respectively, as shown in (Table/Fig 6). No significant difference in CFUs was seen between the cinnamon and neem groups in any of the positions (p>0.05). The average mean percentage of CFU reduction was highest in the Chlorhexidine group at 69.4% compared to distilled water. The neem and cinnamon groups had 11.7% and 25.2% average mean percentage reduction, respectively, compared to distilled water, as shown in (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The basic procedures that are executed for almost all patients everyday cause the dental environment to be highly exposed to contagious airborne particles, which are primarily produced during oral prophylaxis by mechanised scalers, tooth preparation using an air rotor, air abrasive devices, and water air syringes. Coolant for such procedures is obtained from the DUWL, which, when combined with saliva, generates aerosols that are contaminated with microbes, thereby posing a significant risk factor for transmitting infectious diseases, sometimes with fatalities (13). Research has shown that the use of an antimicrobial coolant can reduce the microbial load on dental personnel (14). Chemical agents such as Chlorhexidine and Povidone have substantiated their efficacy in reducing aerosol contamination, however, cinnamon is the only herbal extract that has been researched as a DUWL coolant (8),(15).

In the present study, commercially available CHX mouthwash (Dr. Reddy’s) has been used in the DUWL at a concentration of 0.1% (16). However, while CHX is the gold standard in the synthetic group due to its effective antibacterial effect, it has a number of negative effects, including staining, altered taste perception, tissue irritation, and the rare occurrence of parotid swelling (17).

Many herbs and spices are known for their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. They are available in different forms, such as extracts, essential oils, pastes, and powders. In the present study, cinnamon and neem are taken into consideration due to their common availability and high antibacterial efficacy. Cinnamon is a well known spice that contains several phytochemicals, such as cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl acetate, eugenol, and cinnamyl alcohol. The benefits of cinnamaldehyde against various perio-odontogenic bacteria have been proven (18),(19). When used in appropriate concentrations, cinnamon acts as a potent antimicrobial agent. Cinnamon extracts damage the cell membrane, alter the lipid profile, inhibit cell division, and exhibit anti-quorum sensing effects, contributing to its mode of action against gram negative and gram-positive bacteria (20). Neem exhibits similar properties.

Neem is a potent antibacterial agent due to the presence of gallotannin. It is also known to have a direct antiviral effect against various viruses (9). The mechanism of action of neem as an antimicrobial is through cell wall lysis, and it also shows microbial growth inhibition (10). Numerous studies highlight the benefits of neem in controlling bacterial counts when used as a preprocedural mouthrinse. Additionally, neem has shown substantial effects against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing COVID-19 (21),(22).

The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration of any extract that acts against a specific microorganism. In the present study, the MIC of Neem extract (A.indica) was set at 500 μg/mL (0.5 g/L), which was calculated based on the MIC of neem leaves against E.faecalis, a bacterium known to have 35% colonisation in the microbiota of periodontitis patients (11),(23),(24). The MIC for cinnamon extract against P.gingivalis (a keystone pathogen) was determined to be 3.12±0.65 mg/mL. For ease of extract processing, this value was rounded up to 4 mg/mL (4 g/L) (12).

In the present study, the CHX group showed the maximum reduction in CFUs, around 69.4%, when compared to distilled water. However, the herbal extracts, cinnamon and neem, also demonstrated a reduction of 25.2% and 11.7% in the number of CFUs, respectively, compared to distilled water. A significant and comparable decrease in CFUs was observed in both the neem and cinnamon groups when compared to the CFUs obtained in the distilled water group. This suggests that natural products like neem and cinnamon can be used as alternatives to distilled water. Similarly, Mamajiwala AS et al., evaluated the efficacy of cinnamon, CHX, and distilled water in Dental Unit Water Lines (DUWL), and found that cinnamon and CHX performed better than distilled water (p-value <0.005) (8).

Gupta D and Jain A, compared the effectiveness of cinnamon, CHX, and distilled water as a mouth rinses in terms of reducing plaque formation and gingival inflammation. They concluded that cinnamon had greater benefits compared to distilled water (25). Similarly, Jalaluddin M et al., conducted a study comparing neem extract with CHX as a mouthwash and found that both neem extract and CHX had better clinical outcomes with reduced plaque and gingival indices (26). The antiplaque property of Neem toothpaste was substantiated by Sugiarta AP and Lessang R, where significant reductions in plaque and papillary bleeding indices were observed compared to a placebo (27).

The increasing prevalence of multiresistant strains of microorganisms has become a significant concern in modern medicine. In this context, herbal products have gained attention and preference due to their potential antimicrobial properties. These products contain a diverse range of phytochemicals, including alkaloids, tannins, essential oils, and flavonoids, which have been found to exhibit pronounced antimicrobial activity (28). However, it is crucial to acknowledge that while herbal products show promise as antimicrobial agents, they are not a panacea. Their efficacy, safety, and standardisation may vary, and more research is needed to establish their effectiveness against specific oral conditions. Patient acceptance when using herbal extracts in terms of palatability, provoking any gag reflex, and the freshness felt post-treatment are also concerns that depend on the concentration of the extract. Herbal extracts may pose health hazards if used in very high concentrations. Therefore, striking the right balance between the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and toxicity would make these herbal extracts a promising alternative to distilled water. In the present study, CFUs were analysed for aerobic bacteria only; however, both aerobic and anaerobic microbes are equally present in the aerosol (29).

Limitation(s)

The MICs of the herbal extracts were not calculated in the present study. Calculating the MICs of the herbal extracts against the periodontal pathogens before commencing the study could have provided more substantial and informative results. Determining the MICs would have allowed for a better understanding of the precise concentration required to effectively inhibit the growth of oral microorganisms, which would have been a valuable step to enhance scientific rigor and clinical applicability. Further studies can be done considering the anaerobic bacteria with a larger sample size to validate the efficacy of herbal extracts.

Conclusion

The results of the present study indicate that chlorhexidine was the most effective in reducing CFUs, followed by cinnamon extract, while neem extract was the least effective. These findings suggest that natural remedies can be just as beneficial as the latest advancements in oral healthcare. This article also highlights the fact that herbal products can be equally effective in combating oral microorganisms. By emphasising the potential advantages of neem and cinnamon over distilled water, our study establishes that herbal extracts, which are easily prepared and readily available, present a viable alternative to distilled water for minimising aerosol contamination.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. R. Thirumalai Kumaran M.Pharm., Ph.D., Associate Professor at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research for his valuable contribution in extract preparation.

References

1.
Nulty A, Lefkaditis C, Zachrisson P, Van Tonder Q, Yar R. A clinical study measuring dental aerosols with and without a high-volume extraction device. Br Dent J. 2020;1-8. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Fiehn NE, Larsen T. The effect of drying dental unit waterline biofilms on the bacterial load of dental unit water. Int Dent J. 2002;52(4):251-54. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Azzi L, Carcano G, Gianfagna F, Grossi P, Gasperina DD, Genoni A, et al. Saliva is a reliable tool to detect SARS-CoV-2. J Infect [Internet]. 2020;81(1):e45-50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.005. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Micik RE, Miller RL, Mazzarella MA, Ryge G. Studies on dental aerobiology: I. bacterial aerosols generated during dental procedures. J Dent Res. 1969;48(1):49-56. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Matys J, Grzech-Les´ niak K. Dental aerosol as a hazard risk for dental workers. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(22):01-13. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Lim KS, Kam PCA. Chlorhexidine-Pharmacology and clinical applications. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;36(4):502-12. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Renuka S, Np M. Aq1 Aq2 Aq3 Aq3 Comparison in benefits of herbal mouthwashes with chlorhexidine mouthwash: A review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10(2):03-07. [crossref]
8.
Mamajiwala AS, Sethi KS, Raut CP, Karde PA, Khedkar SU. Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidine and cinnamon extract used in dental unit waterlines to reduce bacterial load in aerosols during ultrasonic scaling. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29(6):749-54. Doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_571_17. PMID: 30589003. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Dwivedi VD, Bharadwaj S, Afroz S, Khan N, Ansari MA, Yadava U, et al. Anti-dengue infectivity evaluation of bioflavonoid from Azadirachta indica by dengue virus serine protease inhibition. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021;39(4):1417-30. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Alzohairy MA. Therapeutics role of azadirachta indica (Neem) and their active constituents in diseases prevention and treatment. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2016;2016:7382506. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Mistry KS, Sanghvi Z, Parmar G, Shah S. The antimicrobial activity of Azadirachta indica, sanctum and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate on common endodontic pathogens: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2019;8(2):172-77. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Saquib SA, Alqahtani NA, Ahmad I, Kader MA, Al Shahrani SS, Asiri EA. Evaluation and comparison of antibacterial efficacy of herbal extracts in combination with antibiotics on periodontal pathobionts: An in vitro microbiological study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019;8(3):89. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Raghunath N, Meenakshi S, Sreeshyla H, Priyanka N. Aerosols in dental practice- a neglected infectious vector. Br Microbiol Res J. 2016;14(2):01-08. [crossref]
14.
S KN, Eachempati P, Paisi M, Nasser M, Sivaramakrishnan G, Jh V. Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):CD013686. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Mungara J, Dilna NC, Joseph E, Reddy N. Evaluation of microbial profile in dental unit waterlines and assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of two treating agents. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;37(4):367-71. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Ronanki S, Kulkarni S, Hemalatha R, Kumar M, Reddy P. Efficacy of commercially available chlorhexidine mouthrinses against specific oral microflora. Indian J Dent Res. 2016;27(1):48-53. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Palka L, Nowakowska-Toporowska A, Dalewski B. Is Chlorhexidine in dentistry an ally or a foe? A narrative review. Healthc. 2022;10(5):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Rao PV, Gan SH. Cinnamon: A multifaceted medicinal plant. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2014;2014:642942. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Vasconcelos NG, Croda J, Simionatto S. Antibacterial mechanisms of cinnamon and its constituents: A review. Microb Pathog. 2018;120:198-203. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Spartak Y. Effects of Cinnamon (Cinnamomum spp.) in dentistry: A review. Molecules [Internet]. 2020;4184(06):2. Available from: 10.3390/molecules25184184. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Wylie MR, Merrell DS. The antimicrobial potential of the Neem Tree Azadirachta indica. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:01-16. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Eze MO, Ejike CECC, Ifeonu P. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company’s public news and information. 2020;(January).
23.
Espíndola LCP, Oliveira AM de, Masterson D, Maia LC, Souto RM do. Prevalence of Enterococcus species in adults with periodontal health or with periodontitis: A systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e019. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Bhardwaj SB, Mehta M, Sood S. Enterococci in the oral cavity of periodontitis patients from different urban socioeconomic groups. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020;17(2):147-51. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Gupta D, Jain A. Effect of cinnamon extract and chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2%) on the clinical level of dental plaque and gingival health: A 4-week, triple-blind randomized controlled trial. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2015;17(3):91-98.
26.
Jalaluddin M, Rajasekaran UB, Paul S, Dhanya RS, Sudeep CB, Adarsh VJ. Comparative evaluation of neem mouthwash on plaque and gingivitis: A double-blind crossover study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(7):567-71. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Sugiarta AP, Lessang RN. Effect of herbal toothpaste containing neem leaves extract (azadirachta indica) against gingivitis: A clinical study. Int J Appl Pharm. 2019;11(1):117-19. [crossref]
28.
Mary AA, Cholan PK, Kesavaram J, Tadepalli A, Umesh SG, Victor DJ. Exploring the immunomodulatory effects of various phytochemicals in dentistry- An encapsulation. J Pharm Negat Results. 2022;13(9):2469-78.
29.
Zemouri C, Volgenant CMC, Buijs MJ, Crielaard W, Rosema NAM, Brandt BW, et al. Dental aerosols: Microbial composition and spatial distribution. J Oral Microbiol [Internet]. 2020;12(1):1762040. Available from: https://doi.org/10.108 0/20002297.2020.1762040.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64913.18720

Date of Submission: Apr 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 01, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 26, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 26, 2023 (10%)

Etymology: Author Origin

Emendations: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com