Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53625

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : WC01 - WC05 Full Version

Comparative Evaluation of Topical Betamethasone Dipropionate Lotion 0.05% versus its Combination with Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection in Alopecia Areata: A Randomised Controlled Trial


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62881.18247
Amit Kumar Tiwari, Pooja Ameta, Pradeep Garg, Naushin Aara

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajsthan, India. 2. Resident Doctor, Department of Dermatology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 3. Consultant Dermatologist, Bharatpur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajsathan, India.

Correspondence Address :
Naushin Aara,
320 B, Udyog Nagar, Jothwara, Jaipur-302012, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: dr.ameta123@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Alopecia Areata (AA) is non-cicatricial patchy hair loss, which is fairly common and may evoke feelings of vulnerability and loss of self-esteem in patients. Many different treatment modalities have been recommended, including topical, systemic, and intralesional corticosteroids (ILCs). However, no treatment has consistently produced satisfactory results, and various topical therapies used in the past have shown limited effectiveness. ILC is the most commonly used treatment for AA, especially in patients with <50% area involved. Despite this, there is a lack of adequately powered randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy, safety, and duration of response.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection, topical betamethasone dipropionate lotion 0.05%, and their combination in treating AA.

Materials and Methods: This randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Dermatology, SMS Medical College, a Tertiary Care Hospital in Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, over a one-year period from August 2012 to July 2013. The study included patients aged 11 to 50 years who were willing to provide informed consent. A total of 120 patients were randomised into two groups (Group A and Group B) of 60 patients each. Twenty patients did not follow-up, leaving 53 patients in Group A and 47 patients in Group B who completed the study were 53 in group A and 47 in group B. Group A received topical betamethasone dipropionate lotion 0.05% with single-night application and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide 10 mg/mL at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Group B received topical betamethasone dipropionate lotion 0.05% with single-night application and intralesional normal saline at the same intervals. Patients were followed-up for an additional 12 weeks. Responses were evaluated using the Hair Regrowth Grade (HRG) scale, and statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test.

Results: Among the study population, the majority of patients (49, 41%) were in the age group of 21-30 years, with 91 males and 29 females. At the end of the 12-week treatment and 12-week follow-up period, Group A showed greater improvement, with 62% of patients achieving hair regrowth grade scale S-IV (76-100%), and 87% {S-IV (76-100%)} respectively, as compared to only 13% in Group B. Similarly, in the follow-up period, Group A had a higher percentage of patients with S-IV (76-100%) regrowth (87%) compared to Group B (32%).

Conclusion: This study concludes that intralesional triamcinolone acetonide 10 mg/mL is an effective and safe treatment option for AA. The addition of single-night application of betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% lotion yields better results than using either treatment alone.

Keywords

Corticosteroids, Efficacy, Hair regrowth scale, Placebo, Scalp

Hair in humans is largely vestigial; however, maintaining residual hair to meet cultural norms holds significant psychological importance. Alopecia Areata, defined as non-cicatricial patchy hair loss, is a common and easily recognisable condition. The most common form involves isolated, asymptomatic hair loss from a circumscribed area, usually on the scalp, with regrowth occurring within a few months. Severe cases can lead to feelings of vulnerability, loss of self-esteem, and changes in self-identity (1).

The aetiology and prognosis of the disease remain uncertain. While some believe it to be an autoimmune process, others suggest that emotional stress may be a significant triggering factor for AA (2),(3). The only predictable aspect of AA is its unpredictability (4). Patients often experience multiple episodes of hair loss and regrowth throughout their lifetime, with recovery ranging from complete to partial or none.

Numerous treatment modalities have been recommended, including topical, systemic, or intralesional corticosteroids, topical immunomodulators, topical irritants, minoxidil, cryotherapy, Psoralene Plus Ultraviolet-A radiation (PUVA) therapy, tacrolimus, zinc, dermography tattooing, wigs, and others (5). Some of these treatments have severe side effects, while others prove to be ineffective. Therefore, it is important to choose a treatment modality that is both effective and safe. Traumatic procedures such as dermabrasion, cryotherapy, needling, and saline injections have also been attempted (5).

Uncontrolled data suggests that intralesional steroids are an excellent treatment option for localised AA, but few studies exist in the literature to prove their efficacy (6),(7). There is no standardised protocol for treatment intervals or duration in AA. Previous studies have typically administered treatment every 3-4 weeks for a period of 3-6 months or until a clinical response is observed. Consequently, this study aims to conduct a comparative evaluation of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection at a concentration of 10 mg/mL versus placebo, as well as the effectiveness of topical betamethasone dipropionate lotion 0.05%, either alone or in combination.

Material and Methods

This randomised controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Dermatology, SMS Medical College, a Tertiary Care Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, over a period of one year from August 2012 to July 2013, following Ethical Committee approval. A total of 120 patients (60 patients in each group) were randomised using block randomisation into two groups.

Sample size calculation: Sixty patients were included in each group based on an expected regrowth rate of 74% in the intralesional triamcinolone group and 47% in the topical betamethasone group, with an alpha error of 0.05, 80% power, and 95% confidence level. The sampling technique used was non-purposive consecutive sampling.

Inclusion criteria: The study included patients aged 11 to 50 years who were willing to provide informed consent. For minor subjects, parental consent was also obtained. Patients with three or fewer patches of AA, with a total area not exceeding 20% of the scalp/face, and who had not received any treatment in the last three months were included.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with rapidly progressing disease involving >20% of the scalp/face area, patients with a history of allergy to steroids, pregnant and lactating females were excluded.

Study Procedure

Details regarding the familial occurrence of AA were noted, along with a history of associated diseases such as atopy, (allergic rhinitis/asthma/eczema) diabetes mellitus, vitiligo, thyroid disorders, pernicious anemia, Addison’s disease, and Down’s syndrome were recorded. The total study duration was 24 weeks (12 weeks of treatment and 12 weeks of follow-up). In Group A, patients were treated with topical betamethasone dipropionate lotion 0.05% applied once at night, and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide 10 mg/mL at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. In Group B, patients received topical betamethasone dipropionate lotion 0.05% applied once at night, and intralesional normal saline at the same intervals. Triamcinolone acetonide at a concentration of 10 mg/mL (maximum volume of 3 mL per session) was injected intradermally with an insulin syringe, using multiple 0.1 mL injections at 1 cm intervals. Baseline pictures and hair regrowth patterns were recorded during treatment (at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks) and at 16, 20, and 24 weeks. Clinical photographs were taken at each visit, and hair regrowth patterns were observed. Hair counting was not performed by the authors, and subjective analysis of hair regrowth was conducted by two independent dermatologists. If AA patches showed approximately up to 25% regrowth, it was graded as Scale I. The responses were analysed using the HRG scale (8):

• S-I=0-25%
• S-II=26-50%
• S-III=51-75%
• S-IV and po=76-100%

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 21.0, a statistical software package for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical data were presented as numbers (percentage proportions) and compared among groups using the Chi-square test. The p-value was calculated using Student’s t-test, with a significance level set at p<0.05.

Results

A total of 120 cases of AA were enrolled and treated using two different treatment modalities. Twenty patients were lost to follow-up, with 7 from group A and 13 from group B. The remaining patients who completed the study were 53 in group A and 47 in group B (Table/Fig 1). Among the patients, 31 (25.83%) were in the age group of 11-20 years, 49 (40.83%) were in the age group of 21-30 years, 29 (24.17%) were in the age group of 31-40 years, and 11 (9.17%) were in the age group of 41-50 years (Table/Fig 2). The largest number of patients (49, 41%) were in the age group of 21-30 years. There was no significant difference observed in the age distributions between the two groups. A total of 91 patients were male, and 29 were female, resulting in a male to female ratio of 3.1:1 (Table/Fig 2).

Out of the total patients, 107 (97.5%) presented for treatment within the first six months of the disease. The majority of patients (99, 82.5%) reported between 1-6 months after the onset of the disease, while only three (2.5%) presented after six months (Table/Fig 3). The progressive type of AA was more common than the stationary type (81% vs 19%) (Table/Fig 4). Scalp involvement was exclusive in 98 (81%) of patients, A total of while 16 (13%) had patches at sites other than the scalp (Table/Fig 5). About 72 (60%) of patients presented with more than one patch (2 or 3), while 48 (40%) presented with a single patch (Table/Fig 6).

The parietal region was the most commonly affected area, found in 49 (40.8%) of cases, followed by the beard in 24 (20%), occipital in 18 (15%), frontal in 10 (8.3%), temporal in 8 (6.7%), vertex in 7 (5.8%), eyebrows in 2 (1.6%), moustache in 2 (1.6%), and no cases involving the arms and legs (Table/Fig 7). Thirteen (9.2%) cases showed a positive family history of AA (Table/Fig 8). Nail changes were associated in 14 (11.6%) of the patients, with pitting and longitudinal ridging observed in 11 (9.1%) and 3 (2.5%) patients, respectively (Table/Fig 9).

During treatment, in group A, atrophy and pigmentation were seen in five and three patients, respectively, and one patient each experienced pruritus and bacterial infection. In group B, only one patient developed atrophy (Table/Fig 10).

The distribution of cases according to the HRG scale at 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment is shown in (Table/Fig 11). At the end of significant12 weeks, group A showed maximal improvement (S-IV, 76-100%) compared to only 13% of cases in group B (S-IV, 76-100%). This difference was significant (p<0.001), indicating a highly significant result. The patients were followed-up at four-week intervals, and their improvement was recorded at each visit. (Table/Fig 11) provides the distribution of cases according to the HRG scale at 4, 8, and 12 weeks of follow-up, with a p-value <0.05 (Table/Fig 11).

The patients were followed-up at four-week intervals, and their improvement was recorded at each visit. (Table/Fig 12) presents the distribution of cases according to the HRG scale at 4, 8, and 12 weeks of follow-up. The maximal growth (S-4, 75%-100%) was observed at the 4th and 16th weeks of therapy (Table/Fig 13). At 16th week of therapy maximal growth S-4 (75%-100%) was seen (Table/Fig 14).

Discussion

AA is a unique disorder characterised by patches of asymptomatic, non-scarring, non-inflammatory hair loss, most commonly on the scalp, with regrowth occurring within a few months. This benign form may gradually progress to more severe forms, sometimes resulting in universal alopecia. In a large study by Miller SA and Winkelman RK, the peak incidence of AA was found to be between 31 and 40 years (9). Shallow reported that 48% of AA patients present before the age of 20 years (2). In the present study, the maximum prevalence was observed in the third decade. The development of AA in the age group of 21-40 years might be due to proposed etiological factors such as stress and strain (3).

The reported sex incidence in AA patients has varied widely. Lowy M et al. reported an equal incidence among males and females (1:1) (10). Bastos AA et al. found a male predominance (3:1), while Friedmann observed a higher number of females with a male to female ratio of 1:2 (11),(12). AA is considered an autoimmune disease and has been reported in association with several well-recognised autoimmune disorders such as thyroid disease, Hashimoto’s disease, pernicious anemia, vitiligo, and Addison’s disease. Muller SA and Winkelmann RK reported a 10% association of atopic manifestations with AA (9).

Nail changes have been found to be associated with a wide range of AA patients. In their series, Muller SA and Winkelmann RK reported that 7% of AA cases had associated nail changes, while Klingmuller G found nail changes in 66% of AA patients (9),(13). The most common manifestations of nail changes are pitting and trachyonychia. Other commonly reported findings include red spotted lunulae, onycholysis, and punctate leukonychia. Various treatment modalities have been recommended for AA, including topical use of corticosteroids, irritants such as phenol anthraline and liquid nitrogen, contact sensitisers like dinitrochlorobenzene, squaric acid dibutyl esters, diphencyprone, PUVA, minoxidil, and tacrolimus. Systemic use of corticosteroids and cyclosporin, as well as intralesional use of corticosteroids, have also been used with satisfactory results (14),(15),(16),(17).

The use of corticosteroids has inherent disadvantages. Improper use of topical and intralesional steroids can lead to atrophy and pigmentation issues. Systemic steroids may cause serious side effects such as hypertension, edema, pseudotumor cerebri, peptic ulceration, gastritis, weight gain, Cushingoid facies, diabetic ketoacidosis, tuberculosis reactivation, avascular necrosis, osteoporosis, cataract, glaucoma, stillbirth, growth suppression, and hypothalamo-pituitary-axis suppression (18). Cochrane Database (2008) reported that although ILCs have been used in the treatment of AA for about 50 years; there are no published randomised controlled trials for intralesional corticosteroids in the treatment of alopecia areata (AA) (19). Kumaresan M observed that ILCs are most suitable and preferred method of treatment for patchy, relatively stable hair loss, of limited extent. But this modality is not appropriate in rapidly progressive AA or alopecia totalis/universalis, intralesional corticosteroids are not appropriate (20).

Porter D and Burton JL showed hair regrowth in 64% and 97% of treated AA sites using intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and triamcinolone hexacetonide, respectively (18). Abell E and Munro DD reported that 52 of 84 patients (62%) showed regrowth of hair at 12 weeks after three injections of triamcinolone acetonide, using the Porto J et needleless device, compared to one of 1 5 (7%) control subjects (21). Kuldeep CM et al. concluded that intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (60%) and betamethasone valerate foam (53.6%) were effective in treating localised AA, while tacrolimus showed no improvement (7). These results are consistent with the present study.

The National Guidelines from the British Association of Dermatologists (2012) recommend intralesional corticosteroid therapy as the first-line treatment for localised patchy AA, with success rates of approximately 60-75%. Prospective studies using triamcinolone acetonide (5-10 mg/mL), administered intradermally at 2-6 week intervals, reported localised hair regrowth in 60-70% of injection sites (22).

Limitation(s)

Long-term follow-up was not conducted to assess the recurrence of alopecia patches after complete remission.

Conclusion

The present study concluded that intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at a concentration of 10 mg/dL is a good treatment option. Additionally, the addition of betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% lotion as a single nighttime application resulted in better outcomes compared to using intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone. The study observed a significant improvement in the group treated with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide compared to the group treated with intralesional normal saline. The slightly increased incidence of side effects in the intralesional triamcinolone acetonide group was attributed to the use of both intralesional and topical steroids. The combination of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and topical betamethasone yielded better results compared to betamethasone alone.

References

1.
Hunt N, McHale S. The psychological impact of alopecia areata. BMJ 2005;331(7522):951-53. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Shallow WV, Edwards JE, Koo JY. Profile of alopecia areata, a questionnaire analysis of patients and family. Int Journal of Dermatol. 1992;31(3):186-89. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Vander SP, Boezeman J, Duller P, Happle R. Can alopecia areata be triggered by emotional stress? Acta Derm Venerol Stockh. 1992;72(4):279-80. [crossref]
4.
Spano F, Donovan JC. Alopecia areata: Part 1: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis. Cam Fam Physician. 2015;61(9):751-55.
5.
Harries MJ, Sun J, King LE. Management of alopecia areata. BMJ. 2010;341:c3671. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Brittany E Yee, Yun Tong, Goldenberg A. Efficacy of different concentrations of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for alopecia areata: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAAD. 2020;82(4):1018-21. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kuldeep C, Singhal H, Khare AK, Mittal A, Gupta LK, Garg A. Randomised comparison of topical betamethasone valearate foam, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and tacrolimus ointment in management of localised alopecia areata. Int J Trichol. 2011;3(1):20-24. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Devi M, Rashid A, Ghafoor R. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide vs topical Betamethasone valearate in management of localised alopecia areata. JCPSP. 2015;25(12):860-62.
9.
Muller SA, Winkelmann RK. Alopecia areata, an evaluation of 736 patients. Ardch Dermatol. 1963;88:290-97. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Lowy M, Ledoux-Corbusier M, Achten G, Wybran J. Clinical and immunologic response to Isoprinosine in alopecia areata and alopecia universalis association with autoantibodies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12(1 Pt 1):78-84. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Bharathi G, Ramana PV, Sridevi K, Usha G, Kumar GR. Clinico Etiological Study of Alopecia AREATA. IOSRJournal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2015;14(6):29-32. e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861. www.iosrjournals. org DOI: 10.9790/0853-14662932 www.iosrjournals.org 29 | Page.
12.
Friedmann PS. Clinical immunological associations of alopecia areata. Semim Dermatol. 1985;4:09-15.
13.
Klingmuller G. Uber Plotzliches. Weissworden and Psychischetraumenbei der Alopecia areata. Dermatologica. 1958;117:84-88. [crossref]
14.
Pericin M, Trueb RM. Topical immunotherapy of severe alopecia areata with diphenyl cyclopropenone: Evaluation of 68 cases. J Dermatology. 1998;196:418-21. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Pasricha JS. Kumrah L. Alopeciatotalis treated with oral minipulse therapy with betamethasone. Ind J dd Derm Ven Lepr. 1996;62:106-09.
16.
Happle R. Antigenic competition as a therapeutic concept for alopecia areata. Arch Dermatol. 1987;114:1036-38.
17.
Chang KH, Rojhirunsakool S, Goldberg LJ. Treatment of severe Alopecia Areata with intralesional steroid injections. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8:909-12.
18.
Porter D, Burton JL. A comparison of intra-lesional triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide in Alopecia Areata. Br J Dermatol. 1971;85:272-73. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Delamere FM, Sladden MM, Dobbins HM, Leonardi-Bee J. Interventions for Alopecia Areata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD004413. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Kumaresan M. Intralesional steroids for alopecia areata. Int J Trichol. 2010;2:63-65. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Abell E, Munro DD. Intralesional treatment of Alopecia Areata with triamcinolone acetonide by jet injector. Br J Dermatol. 1973;88:55-59. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Messenger AG, McKillop J, Farrant P, McDonagh AJ, Sladden M. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of alopecia areata 2012.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62881.18247

Date of Submission: Jan 13, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 04, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 29, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 17, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 24, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 21, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com