Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53352

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : LC01 - LC05 Full Version

Knowledge and Perception Regarding Sexual Health among College Students in Malappuram District, Kerala, India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64978.18392
Nandini Gopalamenon, Remya Ramachandran, Aiswarya K Venugopal

1. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, MES Medical College, Malappuram, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Malabar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Calicut, Kerala, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Remya Ramachandran,
Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Malabar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Modakallur, Calicut-673315, Kerala, India.
E-mail: remyaram2006@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Good Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) encompasses complete physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters related to the reproductive system. Access to accurate information is crucial for maintaining SRH. Adequate knowledge and perception regarding sexual health play a vital role in reducing Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs), teenage or unwanted pregnancies, and empowering individuals against sexual violence.

Aim: To evaluate the knowledge and perception of sexual health and associated factors among college students in Perinthalmanna, Malappuram District, Kerala.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 540 students from January to April 2022 among 540 students attending MES Arts and Science College in Perinthalmanna, Malappuram District, Kerala, India. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to assess their demographic details, knowledge, and perception regarding sexual health. The Chi-square test and Independent t-test were employed, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors, including the students’ academic qualification, educational status of their mothers, and prior information on sexual health.

Results: The respondents were predominantly male (60.4%), with a mean age of 19.32±1.262 years. The majority (95.4%) were undergraduate students, while 4.6% were postgraduate students. Muslims accounted for the majority of respondents (83%), followed by Hindus (14.6%). More than 90% of the participants were unmarried. Approximately 60% of the respondents’ mothers and 51% of the fathers had a high school education. Out of 540 respondents, 487 (90.2%) reported having obtained information on sexual health. Friends (41.7%) were the most preferred sources of information. The mean score for respondents’ knowledge was 3.79±1.3, and the mean score for perception was 31.26±4.5. Being a postgraduate student (p=0.035), having a higher educational status of the mother (p=0.034), and prior information on sexual health (p<0.001) were significantly associated with higher knowledge. Being a postgraduate student (p=0.02) and having a higher educational status of the mother (p=0.03) were significantly associated with higher perception. A total of 21% of the respondents stated that sex education should be provided according to age appropriateness. Gender-wise differences were observed in the respondents’ opinions regarding the timing of sex education (p=0.024).

Conclusion: Good knowledge and positive perception levels were significantly associated with the academic qualification of the study subjects and the educational status of their mothers. However, the respondents’ knowledge regarding fertilisation, pregnancy, and contraceptives was deficient. Therefore, implementing a comprehensive sexual and reproductive health education program in schools and colleges, along with behavioural change communication materials, is urgently needed.

Keywords

Contraception, Fertilisation, Menstruation, Sex education, Young adult

Reproductive health encompasses complete physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters related to the reproductive system and its functions and processes. It includes the ability to have a satisfying and safe sex life and the freedom to choose if and when to reproduce (1). Ensuring the Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) of adolescents and young adults is crucial and requires comprehensive sexuality education, prevention and treatment of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs), and access to family planning counselling. It also involves empowering young people to exercise their rights, such as delaying marriage and rejecting unwanted sexual advances (2).

The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG-3) for health aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all ages by 2030. Achieving SDG-3’s target of universal access to SRH care services (target 3.7) is essential for overall health and well-being (1). Age-appropriate sexuality education is recognised as an important intervention for reducing risks in young adolescents and promoting positive SRH outcomes. Early adolescence is an optimal time to teach about gender and rights, as it allows for enhanced SRH understanding. School-based educational interventions have been implemented globally to enhance adolescent SRH outcomes, and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO’s) evaluation of comprehensive sexuality education has shown positive results in terms of reducing risky behaviours and improving health-seeking behaviours and knowledge (3).

The STIs pose a significant global burden, with more than one million new infections occurring daily. In 2020, World Health Organisation (WHO) estimated 374 million new infections of Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea, Syphilis, and Trichomoniasis. Genital herpes affects over 490 million individuals, and approximately 300 million women have Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infections (4). In India, around 6% of the adult population experiences one or more STIs/Respiratory Tract Infections (RTIs), resulting in 30-35 million new cases annually (5). A study in North Kerala revealed an increasing trend in total STIs, particularly syphilis, over a 20-year period (6). Given the rising prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Aquired Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), STIs, and teenage pregnancies, sex education is crucial for young people in India. It can also educate them about their sexual rights and empower them to protect themselves against violence, assault, and molestation (7).

Previous literature highlights poor knowledge (8) and perception regarding sexual health among young adults (9),(10). However, some studies have shown good knowledge and perception in the adolescent age group (11),(12). Despite the need for SRH services for adolescents and young adults, there is a lack of understanding in many regions, including India. Adolescent-friendly clinics established under the Rashtriya Kishore SwasthyaKaryakram (RKSK) are mandated to provide counselling and support to adolescents, but these clinics have often been inaccessible or inactive, even before the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (13). There is a significant gap in studies examining the knowledge and perception of sexual health among young adults. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and perception of sexual health and associated factors among college students in Perinthalmanna, Malappuram District, Kerala.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2022 among 540 students attending MES Arts and Science College in Perinthalmanna, Malappuram District, Kerala, India. The study was conducted after obtaining Institutional Ethical Clearance from MES Medical College IEC/MES/49/2021.

Inclusion criteria: Undergraduate and postgraduate students aged 18 to 24 years attending the college were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Students who did not give consent or did not complete the questionnaires were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated using the formula 4pq/d2, where the prevalence (p) was 60.3% (14), the complement of the prevalence (q) was 39.7%, and the absolute error (d) was 5%. The minimum calculated sample size was 383, but a sample of 540 was taken to account for an 80% response rate.

Study Procedure

The study was presented to the college Principal with a request letter and the attached questionnaire to obtain permission. Hard copies of the questionnaire were distributed to the students during regular classes, ensuring privacy by spacing out the seats. Investigators were present in the classroom to supervise questionnaire collection and address any queries. The objectives of the study were explained to the students, and written informed consent was obtained, assuring them of anonymity and confidentiality.

Data was collected using a semi-structured self-administered questionnaire [14,15]. The questionnaire was pilot-tested for validation, and the Cronbach’s alpha value for the questions was 0.67. It consisted of 14 questions on socio-demographic details of the students and their parents, eight questions to assess knowledge level, and 12 questions to assess perception towards sexual health. The estimated time for completing the questionnaire was 20 minutes. Knowledge was assessed using one open-ended question and seven scored items, with one point assigned for each correct answer and zero points for incorrect or “I don’t know” answers (maximum score: seven, minimum score: zero). Perception was assessed using three questions on sex education and nine scored items on a five-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). The scoring was reversed for negatively phrased questions. Mean values were used as cut-off scores to assess good knowledge and positive perception. The mean score for knowledge was 3.79±1.3, and a score less than 3.8 was considered poor knowledge, while a score of 3.8 or higher indicated good knowledge. The mean score for perception was 31.2±4.5, and a score less than 31 indicated negative perception, while a score of 31 or higher indicated positive perception.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses with frequency distribution and mean (±SD) were performed for quantitative variables. Chi-square or Fischers-exact tests (depending on sample size) were used to assess the association of knowledge and perception with gender, marital status, educational status of the participants, and educational qualification of their parents. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the characteristics of students with higher knowledge and perception scores. The independent t-test was used to compare means of quantitative variables. Data analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) version 22.0, with a p-value less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

The respondents were predominantly male (60.4%), with a mean age of 19.32±1.262 years. The majority (95.4%) were undergraduate students, while 4.6% were postgraduate students (Table/Fig 1). Out of the 540 respondents, 487 (90.2%) reported having obtained information on sexual health. The most preferred sources of information were friends (41.7%), doctors (12.3%), and teachers (10.2%). About 24% reported receiving information from multiple sources, but 185 (37.9%) stated that their doubts remained unanswered. Approximately 29% gained knowledge on reproduction and sex, and 21 (4.3%) reported feeling embarrassed. The most common reasons for the need for sex education were to avoid sex crimes, avoid stigma, gain knowledge about safe sex, maintain a good family life, and prevent STIs.

In terms of knowledge, only 50% of the respondents knew the average duration of the menstrual cycle correctly. Most respondents knew that sperm is produced in the testes (86%) and ovum is produced in the ovary (83%). Only 37% knew that fertilisation occurs in the fallopian tube. The majority (78%) believed that a girl can become pregnant without attaining menarche. 88% of the respondents had heard of the term contraceptive, but only 44% knew the uses of contraceptives. 57% stated that condoms are the best contraceptive method to prevent both pregnancy and transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (Table/Fig 2).

There were significant differences in knowledge between genders. Females had higher knowledge regarding sperm production (90% vs 82.5%), ovum production (89% vs 79%), and the best contraceptive method (62.6% vs 49.5%). The mean score for respondents’ knowledge was 3.79±1.3, with no significant difference between genders. Postgraduate students had higher knowledge scores compared to undergraduate students (4.5±1.1 vs 3.76±1.3). There was no significant difference in knowledge scores between married and unmarried respondents. Knowledge scores were significantly higher in respondents whose mothers had studied beyond higher secondary class (Table/Fig 3). In terms of perception, the mean score for respondents’ perception was 31.26±4.5, with no significant difference between genders. Postgraduate students had higher perception scores compared to undergraduate students. There was no significant difference in perception scores between married and unmarried respondents. Perception scores were significantly higher in respondents whose mothers had studied beyond higher secondary class (Table/Fig 3).

The majority of the study subjects (94.3%) opined that sex education is essential. More than half (53%) believed that sex education should be imparted before the age of 18 years. Doctors/healthcare providers were considered the best persons to impart sex education by 27.2% of the study participants (Table/Fig 4). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that knowledge on sexual health was associated with increasing academic qualification of the study subjects, higher educational status of the mother, and previous information on sexual health. Perception on sexual health was associated with increasing academic qualification of the study subjects and higher educational status of the mother (Table/Fig 5).

Overall, the study found that there is a need for comprehensive sex education among college students. The findings highlight the gaps in knowledge and the importance of providing accurate information to promote positive sexual health behaviours.

Discussion

The present study found that 60% of the respondents had a good level of knowledge on sexual and reproductive health (SRH). This is higher than a similar study conducted in Malaysia, where only 14.24% of participants demonstrated good knowledge (9). Another study in Italy found that 48% of adolescents had sufficient SRH knowledge (16). However, knowledge gaps were identified in the present study, particularly regarding pregnancy, the site of fertilisation, and the use of contraceptives. This is consistent with findings from the previous literature (3),(16).

Gender-based differences in knowledge were not significant in the present study. This is in contrast to a study by Tiang KP et al., which found that males had better knowledge compared to females, although the difference was not significant (9). Another study found that girls had lower knowledge about reproductive and sexual health compared to boys (15). However, a study by Siva VK et al., showed that females had significantly higher levels of knowledge in reproductive and sexual health (17).

Friends, doctors, and teachers were the preferred sources of sex education in the present study, which is consistent with previous studies (14),(18). However, the reliance on friends as a source of information may contribute to the spread of false information and misunderstandings about sexual health. The majority of study participants believed that sex education is essential, which is consistent with previous studies [12,19]. However, there were some differences in opinions between males and females (17).

This study found positive level of perception in 52% of the respondents with a mean value of 31.35±4.5. More than 94% of the study subjects opined that sex education is essential. This finding was similar to that of previous studies. A study done in Haryana found 93.5% of study subjects were in favour of sex education. Boys 374 (97.1%) were more likely to favour sex education as compared to girls 321 (89.7%). But unlike the present study, it was found to be statistically significant (12). In a study done by Benzaken T et al., 87% of the participants believed it important to have sex education as part of the school curriculum (19). There was significant difference between males and females in their opinion of inclusion of sex education in curriculum in a study by Siva VK et al., (17).

About 53% of the study respondents agreed that masturbation is normal. A similar finding was noted in a study done by Kushwah SS and Mittal A (20). In contrast, in a study done by Iqbal M in Kashmir, only 30% of the respondents agreed that masturbation is a normal phenomenon (21). In the same study, 65% responded that girls can become pregnant after reaching the age of menarche. In the present study, 78% believed that a girl can become pregnant without attaining menarche.

The study found that postgraduate students and respondents with mothers who had higher educational status had higher knowledge and perception scores. This may be due to the association between parents’ knowledge of sexuality education and their educational status (22). Previous studies have also shown that early exposure to SRH education is associated with higher knowledge scores (16).

A study done among older adolescent girls in Bangladesh found no significant association between educational status of parents and SRH related knowledge and attitude (23). Literature measuring the direct effect of parents’ educational status on the SRH knowledge and perception of children is lacking. An important reason might be that parents as a source of information for sexual health is less preferred [12,17].

Overall, the study highlights the need for comprehensive sex education among college students. The findings suggest that there are knowledge gaps that need to be addressed, particularly regarding pregnancy and contraceptive use. The study also emphasises the importance of providing accurate information to promote positive sexual health behaviours.

Limitation(s)

There are some limitations to consider. The study may have been affected by social desirability bias, as participants may have provided answers they believed were socially acceptable. Additionally, the study was unable to examine the potential association between parents’ socio-economic status and SRH knowledge and perception due to limited information on this factor.

Conclusion

The present survey among young adults has revealed a higher level of knowledge in sexual health. However, there are knowledge gaps regarding fertilisation, pregnancy, and contraceptives. Good knowledge and positive perception levels were significantly associated with the academic qualification of the study participants and the educational status of their mothers. Therefore, there is an urgent need for comprehensive sexual and reproductive health education programmes, which should be incorporated into the school and college curriculum, along with behavioural change communication materials. The present study was conducted among young adults, a cohort that faces significant risks related to reproductive and sexual health during the transition from adolescence to adulthood. In the debate surrounding the inclusion of sex education in the school curriculum in India, concerns have been raised about potential negative effects and the impact on cultural values. However, this research effectively dispels these concerns and demonstrates that young people who receive sex education have significantly greater knowledge of sexual and reproductive health compared to their peers who do not receive sex education.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Ms. Jossy John, Biostatistician, Sri Lalithambigai Medical College, Chennai, for her support in the study.

References

1.
World Health Organisation (WHO). Sexual Health and its Linkages to Reproductive Health: An Operational Approach. World Health Organization. 2017. Pp. 1-12.
2.
UNFPA. Operational Guidance for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: A Focus on Human Rights and Gender. UNFPA New York; 2014. Pp. 1-72.
3.
Pleaner M, Milford C, Kutywayo A, Naidoo N, Mullick S. Sexual and reproductive health and rights knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of adolescent learners from three South African townships: Qualitative findings from the Girls Achieve Power (GAP Year) Trial. Gates Open Res. 2022;6:60. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
World Health Organisation (WHO). Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). 2022.
5.
Patel NJ, Mazumdar VS. The current status of sexually transmitted infections/reproductive tract infections in Vadodara City: Health-care provider perspective. Indian J Community Med Off Publ Indian Assoc Prev Soc Med. 2019;44(3):247-51. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Suresh A, Jose R, Sasidharanpillai S, Chathoth AT, Ajithkumar K. Linear trends over 20 years in sexually transmitted infections among patients attending a tertiary care center in north Kerala, India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023;89(1):60-64. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Tripathi N, Sekher TV. Youth in India ready for sex education? Emerging evidence from national surveys. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71584.[crossref][PubMed]
8.
Perera U, Abeysena C. Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of sexual and reproductive health rights among undergraduates in state universities in Sri Lanka. Research Square. 2022;01-16. [crossref]
9.
Tiang KP, Chander SM, Hui MTC, Palaniapan P. Knowledge and perception of sexual health among medical undergraduates: A cross-sectional study. Open J Epidemiol. 2016;6(04):233-43. [crossref]
10.
Radhakrishnan T. Knowledge on reproductive health among graduate students in northern Kerala. Int J Heal Sci Res. 2017;7(4):183-90.
11.
Anilkumar A, Varghese A, Mathews C, Paul S, Sajan M, Joseph S. Sex education, awareness and perception among adolescents: A cross-sectional study from Central Kerala. Int J Community Med Public Heal. 2022;9(11):4081-85. [crossref]
12.
Kumar R, Goyal A, Singh P, Bhardwaj A, Mittal A, Yadav SS. Knowledge attitude and perception of sex education among school going adolescents in Ambala District, Haryana, India: A Cross-Sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):LC01-LC04. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kedia S, Verma R, Mane P. Sexual and reproductive health of adolescents and young people in india: The missing links during and beyond a pandemic BT-health dimensions of COVID-19 in India and Beyond. In: Pachauri S, Pachauri A, editors. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2022. Pp. 203-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7385-6_10. [crossref]
14.
Mukherjee A, Gopalakrishnan R, Thangadurai P, Kuruvilla A, Jacob KS. Knowledge and attitudes toward sexual health and common sexual practices among college students-A survey from Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019;41(4):348-56. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Deshmukh DD, Chaniana SS. Knowledge about sexual and reproductive health in adolescent school-going children of 8th, 9th, and 10th standards. J Psychosexual Heal. 2020;2(1):56-62. [crossref]
16.
Brunelli L, Bravo G, Romanese F, Righini M, Lesa L, De Odorico A, et al. Sexual and reproductive health-related knowledge, attitudes and support network of Italian adolescents. Public Heal Pract. 2022;3:100253. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Siva VK, Nesan GSCQ, Jain T. Knowledge, attitude and perception of sex education among school going adolescents in urban area of Chennai, Tamil Nadu. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2021;10(1):259-64. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Mcharo RD, Mayaud P, Msuya SE. Where and how do young people like to get their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information? Experiences from students in higher learning institutions in Mbeya, Tanzania: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1683. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Benzaken T, Palep AH, Gill PS. Exposure to and opinions towards sex education among adolescent students in Mumbai: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:805. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Kushwah SS, Mittal A. Perceptions and practice with regard to reproductive health among out-of-school adolescents. Indian J Community Med. 2007;32(2):141-43. [crossref]
21.
Iqbal M. The level of knowledge and awareness about sex and reproductive health among adolescents in Kashmir. J Psychosexual Heal [Internet]. 2021;3(1):51-56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2631831821989927. [crossref]
22.
Azira N, Abdullah F, Muda S, Mohd Zain N, Hazariah S, Abdul Hamid S. The role of parents in providing sexuality education to their children. Makara J Heal Res. 2020;24:157-63.
23.
Zakaria M, Karim F, Mazumder S, Cheng F, Xu J. Knowledge on, attitude towards, and practice of sexual and reproductive health among older adolescent girls in Bangladesh: An institution-based cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7720.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64978.18392

Date of Submission: Apr 25, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Spr 28, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 08, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com