Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53576

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : OD01 - OD04 Full Version

Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Telehealth: A Unique Case Report


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65018.18413
Mubasheer Ali, Ayesha Nazneen, Prashant Janjal

1. Senior Consultant, Internal Medicine, Department of MRC, Apollo Telehealth, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Head and Senior Consultant, Department of MRC, Apollo Telehealth, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 3. Public Health Specialist, Department of MRC, Apollo Telehealth, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mubasheer Ali,
Krishe Sapphire Building, 9th Floor, MSR Block, Hitech City Main Road, Hyderabad-500133, Telangana, India.
E-mail: dr.mubasheer_a@apollolifeline.com

Abstract

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is common among individuals with cirrhosis, regardless of the cause, but rare in those without cirrhosis. While HCC typically spreads to lymph nodes in the abdomen, lungs, and bones, metastasis to the cardiac region is relatively uncommon. Early screening and diagnosis are crucial for determining the feasibility and prognosis of HCC treatment. In addition to well-known causes such as alcohol consumption and viral hepatitis B and C, Non alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is emerging as a significant risk factor for cirrhosis, steatosis, and advanced liver fibrosis, contributing to the rise in HCC cases due to the increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome. The present case report highlights a 71-year-old patient with HCC who was able to receive a timely diagnosis through telemedicine and initiate treatment with an oncologist. The patient underwent Intensity Modified Stereotactic Radiotherapy (IMSR) followed by bridge therapy with chemotherapy drugs. The treatment plan was implemented in July 2022, and the patient tolerated it well, remaining haemodynamically stable with no complaints.

Keywords

Chemotherapy drug, Cirrhosis, eHealth, Liver cell, Telemedicine

Case Report

A 71-year-old male patient consulted a general medicine expert through teleconsultation in June 2022, and all of his demographic information was collected. An electronic medical record with a Universal Healthcare Identifier (UHID) was established. The patient presented with gradual onset moderate generalised asthenia and fatigue, decreased appetite, nausea, abdominal discomfort, bloating, and acute bodyaches for the past 10 days. Further history revealed that the patient had co-morbidities of diabetes mellitus for 16 years, managed with glimipride 1 mg twice and metformin 500 mg twice per day, and hypertension for 12 years, controlled with cilnidipine 10 mg once per day. The patient had a significant past history of an unknown liver ailment 35 years ago, for which he received treatment, but no documentation was available. The patient reported no alcohol consumption.

Vital signs were recorded, showing a height of 176 cm, weight of 83 kg, body temperature of 97°F, pulse rate of 88 beats per minute with a regular rhythm, respiratory rate of 17 cycles per minute, and blood pressure of 135/80 mmHg. General and systemic examinations were conducted virtually with the assistance and coordination of the centre’s duty doctor and paramedic under the guidance of specialists. No clubbing, cyanosis, pallor, lymphadenopathy, or severe pedal edema was observed during the general examination. However, icterus (jaundice) was present. No abnormal findings were detected during the cardiac examination, with no heaves, thrills, murmurs, or adventitious sounds. Tracheal examination revealed normal findings with vesicular breath sounds. No rhonchi or crackles were heard. Abdominal examination showed distension with mild tenderness over the right hypochondriac and umbilical areas, guarding, rigidity, and no palpable mass. Moderate hepatomegaly (enlarged liver) was observed, while no splenomegaly (enlarged spleen) was noted. Auscultation revealed normal bowel sounds. The central nervous system examination showed normal motor and sensory systems, with normal deep tendon reflexes, plantar reflexes, gait, and coordination.

Initially, symptomatic management was prescribed, including rabeprazole 20 mg once daily, ondansetron 4 mg as needed, syrup of aluminum hydroxide and milk of magnesia twice daily, paracetamol 500 mg as needed, along with a vitamin B12 supplement. The patient was asked to review after three days. However, as there was no improvement in symptoms, routine blood work was advised. The investigations revealed mild anaemia with a haemoglobin level of 10 grams/dL. The liver function profile showed elevated total and indirect bilirubin levels, as well as elevated levels of Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT/AST), Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT/ALT), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). Noteworthy results included a total bilirubin level of 2.4 mg/dL, an indirect bilirubin level of 1.1 mg/dL, ALP of 188 u/L, SGOT of 101 u/L, SGPT of 71 u/L, GGT of 190 u/L, globulin of 4.4 grams/dL, and an Albumin/Globulin (A/G) ratio of 0.6 (Table/Fig 1). Based on the clinical picture and investigation parameters, an abdominal ultrasonography was advised, which revealed involvement of the right hepatic lobe with enlargement, suggesting a possible neoplastic lesion. It also indicated the presence of portal vein thrombosis and mild ascites. Subsequently, a Contrast Enhanced-CT (CECT) scan of the abdomen was performed, which revealed multiple ill-defined heterogeneous arterial phase enhancing masses in the right lobe of the liver, indicating Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), along with enlarged periportal, peripancreatic, and epicardial lymph nodes, and portal vein thrombosis (Table/Fig 2).

To rule out metastasis and secondary growths, a Positron Emission Tomography Scan-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) was conducted, which confirmed multifocal HCC with low-grade metabolically active multiple enhancing lesions in the right and caudate lobes of the liver. No significant regional lymphadenopathy or other evident metabolically active disorders were observed in the rest of the scanned segment of the body (Table/Fig 3).

Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP) was highly elevated at 3405 ng/dL. Hepatic serology for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) was negative. Upper Gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed portal hypertension with low-grade esophageal varices. The diagnosis of HCC was established based on the elevated AFP level, along with the findings from the CT and ultrasound scans. The patient received counselling through telemedicine and telehealth, where the carcinoma and the planned therapy were explained in detail. Virtual palliative counselling was provided, and the patient was informed about the potential adverse effects and the tolerance to the therapy. A referral was made to a higher cancer centre, where a team of surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists evaluated the patient. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was recommended as the initial treatment, consisting of five fractions based on intensity-modulated radiation therapy. RT stimulation CT scan was performed to initiate the therapy, and the patient received 30 Gy in five fractions at 6 Gy per fraction. The initial plan was to initiate bridge therapy, so chemotherapy with sorafenib was started after radiotherapy. The patient tolerated the treatment well.

The patient has been regularly followed-up through teleconsultations for assistance and guidance, with most of his symptoms alleviated. Routine investigations such as Complete Blood Picture (CBP), liver function tests, and AFP were performed during the follow-up visits, showing a steady decline in the parameters as the treatment progressed. Expert psychologists from Apollo Telehealth conducted psychological counselling sessions through telemedicine to assess the patient’s mental status and the impact of cancer on his psychological health. Counselling sessions were conducted as needed. Health coaches from ATH facilitated telemedicine sessions on lifestyle modifications, dietary guidance, and guidance related to the therapy and its adverse effects. The patient felt at ease and comfortable during these telemedicine sessions, which helped instill self-confidence and a positive attitude in dealing with cancer. Confidentiality of patient data, privacy, and security were prioritised and handled with utmost professionalism.

Discussion

Primary liver cancer, commonly known as HCC, is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide (1). Cirrhosis and chronic liver disease are the main risk factors for HCC, with viral hepatitis and excessive alcohol consumption being the top two risk factors globally. In less developed countries, HCC ranks as the second most common cause of cancer death in men (1). About 80% of liver cancers occur in cirrhotic livers, which are at high risk for developing HCC. The management of HCC is challenging, as over 60% of patients are not eligible for surgery at the initial stage due to inadequate liver function and the aggressive nature of liver cell carcinoma. Surgery is only considered for large singular HCCs greater than 10 cm in size (2). The diagnosis of HCC is established based on clinical findings, as there is no definitive pathological confirmation. Screening for HCC includes regular ultrasound and radiological tests, as well as serological markers such as Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP) every six months (3). Treatment modalities are decided based on the functional status of the liver, tumour size, presence of metastases, and other factors. Due to the aggressive nature of HCC, it is often detected at an advanced stage with liver metastases (4). Early detection of cancer is associated with better prognosis, making AFP a commonly used biomarker for HCC diagnosis. In the future, new biomarkers may become available for early lesion detection (4),(5).

Histologically, HCC can be well-differentiated or poorly-differentiated, with the most typical architectural pattern being trabecular. Other patterns include sarcomatoid, compact, and pseudoacinar. The histology may vary based on the degree of differentiation, with well-differentiated cells showing smaller size, less nuclear atypia, and double the nuclear density compared to normal liver cells. Moderately-differentiated cells are larger with more eosinophilic cytoplasm, pseudoglands, distinctive nucleoli, bile, and massive tumour cells. Poorly-differentiated cells are larger with significant pleomorphism and hyperchromatic nuclei, and may contain spindle cell or small-cell regions (6).

During initial assessment, liver function tests may show elevated levels of bilirubin, ALT, AST, ALP, and albumin, indicating the extent of the condition. Patients with impaired liver function or reserve may also have higher levels of INR, PT, thrombocytopenia, anaemia, hyponatraemia, or hypoglycaemia. These results are typically seen in advanced HCC, chronic hepatitis, or cirrhosis-related HCC. In patients with early, non cirrhotic HCC, liver function test results may be normal. Paraneoplastic symptoms of HCC may include hypoglycaemia, hypercalcaemia, and erythrocytosis. Additional laboratory tests, such as hepatitis B surface antigen, anti-HCV antibody, alpha antitrypsin level, copper levels, and iron saturation, may be conducted to assess the underlying causes of HCC (7).

Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP) is a serum glycoprotein produced by the foetal yolk sac and liver during gestation. Elevated AFP levels are typical in advanced HCC and do not necessarily correlate with tumour size or vascular invasion. Approximately 40% of early HCC cases do not secrete AFP. In early non cirrhotic HCC, serum AFP levels may be within the normal range. A cut-off of 10.9 ng/mL for serum AFP provides a sensitivity of approximately 66% and a specificity of 80% (normal range is between 10 and 20 ng/mL). Serum AFP levels above 200 ng/mL are highly specific but moderately sensitive for detecting HCC. Using a cut-off point of 500 ng/mL, the specificity for detecting HCC in individuals with concurrent liver disease is over 90%. However, patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, pregnancy, and other germ line and non germ line tumours may also have high serum AFP levels. AFP is used in combination with ultrasound for monitoring HCC. Additional biomarkers such as Des-Gamma-Carboxyprothrombin (DCP) and lectin-bound Alpha fetoprotein may also be increased in HCC (8).

Despite the fact that authors did not have access to these biomarkers, they will be relevant in the future for detecting HCC at the earliest stages. Currently, the only molecular drug authorised for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular cancer is sorafenib. Sorafenib was used in this instance to bridge radiation. It targets Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA), and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. According to data from Guo WJ et al., a combined modality approach is preferable for treating large HCCs, compared to chemoembolisation alone (9). Sorafenib is also approved for the treatment of advanced HCC by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is considered a “Fast Track” medication. It has shown promising results in Phase III trials (10). Sorafenib is a small chemical inhibitor that targets Raf kinase, Platelet-derived Growth Factor (PGDF), VEGF receptor 2 and 3 kinases, and the stem cell factor receptor ckit. It inhibits the RAF/MEK/ERK signalling pathway, which regulates cell division and proliferation, and suppresses tumour angiogenesis by blocking VEGFR-2/PDGFR-beta signalling (11).

In the present case, early detection and initiation of therapy were made possible by the cooperative efforts of telemedicine, radiation, and chemotherapy. Early intervention has helped in stopping the progression of carcinoma, and the patient’s signs and symptoms have significantly improved. Parameters such as AFP and serum bilirubin levels have shown a steady decline, indicating the effectiveness of telemedicine in early detection and treatment. Telemedicine has facilitated cancer management in the present case, providing psychological counselling, symptomatic treatment, and remote chemotherapy sessions under supervision. The benefits of telemedicine include convenience, safety, reduced healthcare costs, and improved access to care, especially for those in rural areas (12).

Apollo Hospitals, the largest and most established multi-specialty telemedicine network in South Asia, has over 20 years of extensive experience in the sector. They provide high-quality healthcare to both urban and rural communities, offering services such as teleconsultations, teleradiology, telecardiology, telecondition management, and tele-emergency services (13). (Table/Fig 4) shows a flowchart of the teleconsultation process that authors followed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, telemedicine has the potential to be a valuable tool in the diagnosis and management of HCC. The case study presented demonstrates how telemedicine allowed a patient with HCC to receive a diagnosis and initiate therapy without the need to travel to a large urban centre. Telemedicine also provided the patient with palliative virtual counselling sessions, guidance on therapy compliance, and emotional and mental support through virtual health coaches and telemental counselling sessions. The present report highlights the ability of telemedicine to improve access to healthcare in rural and underserved areas. The findings of the present study suggest that telemedicine can enhance access to and quality of care for HCC patients. However, further research is needed to validate these findings and determine the optimal utilisation of telemedicine for HCC diagnosis and therapy.

References

1.
Large hepatocellular carcinoma in a non-cirrhotic liver with peritoneal and omental metastasis in a healthy man: A case report | Journal of Medical Case Reports | Full Text [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 13]. Available from: https://jmedicalcasereports.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13256-017-1203-9.
2.
Lin Q, Chen D, Li K, Fan X, Cai Q, Lin W, et al. Case report: Massive hepatocellular carcinoma complete surgical resection after portal vein embolization and multimodality therapy. Front Radiol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 13];2. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fradi.2022.858963. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Balogh J, Victor D, Asham EH, Burroughs SG, Boktour M, Saharia A, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: A review. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2016;3:41-53. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Tsuchiya N, Sawada Y, Endo I, Saito K, Uemura Y, Nakatsura T. Biomarkers for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2015;21(37):10573-83. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Song P, Tang Q, Feng X, Tang W. Biomarkers: Evaluation of clinical utility in surveillance and early diagnosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Scand J Clin Lab Investig Suppl. 2016;245:S70-76. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Asafo-Agyei KO, Samant H. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559177/.
7.
Tseng TC, Liu CJ, Yang HC, Su TH, Wang CC, Chen CL, et al. High levels of hepatitis B surface antigen increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with low HBV load. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(5):1140-49.e3; quiz e13-14. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2009;27(9):1485-91. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Guo WJ, Yu EX, Liu LM, Li J, Chen Z, Lin JH, et al. Comparison between chemoembolization combined with radiotherapy and chemoembolization alone for large hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(8):1697-701. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Sorafenib [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 23]. Available from: https://www. chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Sorafenib.html#_note-PhaseIIIHCC/.
11.
Kong FH, Ye QF, Miao XY, Liu X, Huang SQ, Xiong L, et al. Current status of sorafenib nanoparticle delivery systems in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics. 2021;11(11):5464-90. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Yadav K, Ginsburg O, Basu P, Mehrotra R. Telemedicine and cancer care in low- and middle-income countries during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. JCO Glob Oncol. 2021;7:1633-38. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Apollo Telehealth|Tele healthcare Services in India|Telemedicine|TeleConsul tation Services [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 13]. Available from: https://www. apollotelehealth.com/.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65018.18413

Date of Submission: Apr 26, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 31, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 05, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 11, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com