Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 15705

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : BC06 - BC11 Full Version

Vitamin D and Vitamin D Receptor FokI, ApaI, and BsmI Gene Polymorphisms and their Relation with the Risk of Breast Carcinoma: A Case-control Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69296.19241
Ashok Kumar Dogra, Archana Prakash, Sanjay Gupta, Meenu Gupta

1. PhD Scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Professor, Department of Biosciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 4. Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ashok Kumar Dogra,
PhD, Department of Biochemistry, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun-248140, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: akbhagat.pu@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer stands as the leading cause of mortality among women in developing nations. The potential role of Vitamin D in mitigating the incidence of breast cancer is thought to stem from its ability to impede cell proliferation by interacting with the Vitamin D Receptor (VDR). The VDR gene is responsible for encoding the VDR, which plays a pivotal role in mediating the effects of vitamin D.

Aim: To analyse vitamin D levels and the association of VDR FokI, ApaI, and BsmI genotypic distribution frequency with the risk of breast cancer.

Materials and Methods: The case-control study included 220 samples, including 110 breast cancer patients and 110 age-matched control women aged 30-70 years. The Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) genotyping was performed using Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from blood, and the circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D by case/control were estimated by chemiluminescence immunoassay.

Results: The 3’ VDR polymorphism BsmI sequence showed minimal association with breast cancer risk. The bb genotype had a significantly lower odds ratio of 0.056 (p-value<0.05). Conversely, the BB and Bb genotypes exhibited no statistically significant associations with odds ratios of 1.76 (95% CI: 0.36-8.54; p-value>0.05) and 1.30 (95% CI: 0.27- 6.25; p-value>0.05), respectively. Isolated analysis of the FokI variant revealed a significant association with increased breast cancer risk, with odds ratios of 5.49 (FF) and 6.00 (Ff), both demonstrating statistical significance (p-value<0.05), and a Chi-square value of 0.006. Additionally, the p-value for serum Vitamin D levels was found to be highly significant at p-value<0.001, indicating that the levels were significantly lower in individuals newly diagnosed with breast cancer compared to those in the healthy control group.

Conclusion: The study found a significant link between breast cancer susceptibility and VDR (FokI) polymorphism FF and Ff genotypes, with minimal impact observed for (BsmI) polymorphism bb genotype. This implies that certain genetic variations, especially in the FokI polymorphism of the VDR gene, are associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer.

Keywords

ApaI single nucleotide polymorphisms, Breast cancer, BsmI single nucleotide polymorphisms, FokI single nucleotide polymorphisms

Every year, breast cancer leads the world in morbidity and mortality rates for women (1). In India, this disease accounts for 30.1% of all female cancer cases (Globocan 2020; http://globocan.iarc.fr/). The Indian subcontinent has seen an increase in cancer incidence, mortality, and morbidity (2),(3),(4),(5). The increasing mortality is likely due to ineffective screening strategies, advanced-stage diagnosis, and inadequate medical facilities. Recent studies have indicated that vitamin D may play a role in the development of breast cancer. In several studies, there is evidence that low levels of 25- hydroxyvitamin D {25(OH)D} increases the risk of breast cancer and have also shown an association between dietary intakes, dietary supplements, and skin production of vitamin D and breast cancer risk (6),(7),(8). Aside from the classical role of vitamin D in calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, calcitriol exerts anticancer properties through transcriptional and/or non genetic mechanisms (9). The active vitamin D3 (1α,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3) exerts its biological effects via the VDR. It belongs to the family of nuclear receptors and is a ligand-dependent transcription factor (10). Cell cycle arrest, senescence, differentiation, and apoptosis are induced by the Vitamin D-ligand VDR in a variety of tumour types (11).

There are several polymorphisms in the coding and non coding regions of VDR on 12q13.11. Numerous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified in and around exons 2-9 as well as in the 3’ UTR region of the VDR gene (12). The most commonly studied SNPs are those containing Restriction Fragment Length polymorphisms (RFLPs) rs1544410, rs2228570, and rs7975232, determined by restriction endonucleases BsmI, FokI, and ApaI (13),(14),(15). The VDR contains the BsmI SNP (A/G) in intron eight near the 3’ end, and its effect on VDR protein expression and activity is unclear. However, in Caucasians, Chinese, and Japanese Americans, it is in strong linkage disequilibrium with a polyadenosine microsatellite repeat, which may affect mRNA stability or translation activity (16). A FokI site present in the 5' promoter region substitution results in thymine (T) to cytosine (C) that changes the first of two possible translation initiation sites, resulting in different-sized VDR proteins. An f allele is three amino acids longer than an F allele and transcriptionally less active (17). An ApaI SNP (C/A) variable site is located in intron 8 of the VDR gene. VDR polymorphisms may alter expression and function in breast cells, thereby modulating breast cancer risk (18).

Several studies performed on Caucasian populations have given inconsistent results regarding FokI, BsmI, and ApaI SNPs and breast cancer risk (19),(20),(21),(22). There have been very few studies on Asian populations. An association was found between the FokI SNP and Japanese-American women in the Hawaii-Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort (MEC), but not in large Chinese studies or small Iranian studies (23),(24),(25). A BsmI SNP was associated with Iranian women and Japanese-American women from the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study, but not with two Chinese studies (26). The ApaI SNP showed mixed results in different populations and was primarily studied in African Americans, Caucasians, and Chinese (27),(28),(29). In the present study, three polymorphisms, one from the 5` region (FokI) and two from the 3` region of the VDR gene (ApaI and BsmI), and vitamin D, were investigated to assess the association with the risk of breast cancer. The study aims to offer insights into genetic factors impacting breast cancer susceptibility for personalised risk assessment and prevention.

Material and Methods

The present study was a hospital-based age-matched case-control study conducted at the Cancer Research Institute, a tertiary care centre located at Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India during the period from the year 2020 to 2023. This study included 110 freshly diagnosed breast cancer patients and age-matched 110 healthy controls aged 30 to 70 years. The institute’s ethics committee approved the study, which was conducted in accordance with all the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki (Letter No. SRHU/HIMS/ETHICS/2020/193). A written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The inclusion and exclusion criteria were primarily used to select patients. The inclusion criteria included breast cancer patients selected based on histopathological confirmation, both pre- and postmenopausal women, and excluding those on hormonal therapy, with other cancers, recent Vitamin D supplementation, or pregnant or lactating. Age-matched healthy female volunteers were included as controls.

Sample size estimation: The sample size was estimated using the n-Master software for a matched case-control study (1:1) matching. Assuming that the proportion of exposed controls is 50% and the level of significance is 5% with a power of 90% to detect a two-fold increase in risk. The minimum number of required discordant pairs is 110.

Data collection: A comprehensive proforma was used to capture demographics, co-morbidities, family history, and anthropometric information, as well as pertinent clinical information from our online hospital database. The tumour morphology was classified according to criteria; Elston and Ellis used architectural aspects, nuclear differentiation levels, and mitotic index based on the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for breast cancer developed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (30). The quality of genomic DNA was assessed through agarose gel electrophoresis, and VDR gene polymorphisms were genotyped using PCR-RFLP analysis.

The Vitamin D levels in serum were determined for all freshly diagnosed cases and controls using the Chemiluminescent Immunoassay (CIA) method by trained laboratory technicians. Serum 25(OH)D levels were classified based on our institution’s laboratory reference standards as sufficient/normal (75-250 nmol/L), insufficient (50-<75 nmol/L), and deficient (<50 nmol/L) (31). Results were expressed in nmol/L.

Genotyping analysis: FokI, BsmI, and ApaI genotyping utilised PCR-RFLP analysis, employing agarose gels for DNA quality confirmation. The FokI polymorphism was detected using the following primers:

Forward: 5’GAT GCC AGC TGG CCC TGG CAC TG 3’ and Reverse: 5’ATG GAA ACA CCT TGC TTC TTC TCC CTC 3’, yielding a 272 bp fragment spanning the FokI site (Raza S et al., 2019) (32). The BsmI polymorphism was detected using the following primers: Forward: 5’CAACAAGACTACAAGTACCGC GTCAGTGA3’ and Reverse: 5’AACCAGCGGGAAGAGGTCAAG 7GGG 3’, generating an 825 bp fragment surrounding the BsmI site (Raza S et al., 2017) (33). The ApaI-RFLP was detected by the following primers: Forward: 5' CAG AGC ATG GAC AGG GAG CAA G 3' and Reverse: 5' CGG CAG CGG ATG TAC GTC TGC AG 3', yielding a 352 bp fragment spanning the ApaI site (El-Shorbagy HM et al., 2017) (29). The following conditions were used for the PCR: initial denaturation at 94°C for three minutes, followed by 34 cycles of cyclic denaturation at 94°C for one minute, annealing 50 seconds at 71°C for FokI, 71°C for ApaI, and 58°C for BsmI, then extension at 72°C for one minute and one final cycle of final extension at 72°C for eight minutes, and final hold at 4°C. After PCR, the amplified PCR products were digested according to the manufacturer’s instructions with FokI, BsmI (New England Biolabs, USA), and ApaI (Promega). In 2% agarose, fragments were stained with ethidium bromide to determine whether the enzyme recognition site was present (lowercase) or absent (uppercase). The genotypes for VDR-FokI (FF, Ff, ff), VDR-BsmI (BB, Bb, bb), and VDR-ApaI (AA, Aa, aa) polymorphisms were assigned. Randomly selected samples of three genotypes including Homozygous dominant, recessive, and heterozygous were confirmed by SNP sequencing, and the results were 100% concordant.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis, including odds ratios and Chi-square tests, were used to evaluate associations between specific VDR gene polymorphisms and breast carcinoma risk. Data entered into Microsoft Excel 2010 were analysed using statistical software version Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0. Normality was assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. An Independent t-test was used for two groups, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for more than two groups to compare mean differences. The deviation from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was tested for polymorphisms by examining the differences between genotype frequencies observed and those expected, utilising the χ2 test. Descriptive statistics and graphical representations were used to enhance the result interpretation. It is considered statistically significant when the p-value <0.05, and statistically insignificant if the p-value >0.05.

Results

In this hospital-based case-control study, 110 patients and 110 healthy controls were compared. Among the study participants, demographic characteristics and risk factors were analysed, with predominantly 37 (33.6%) cases and 40 (36.4%) controls falling within the 40-49 age range. Urban residency accounted for 70% of cases and 86.4% of controls, while rural and Semiurban areas had lower frequencies. Premenopausal status was balanced, with 58.2% of cases and 61.8% of controls. Normal BMI was observed in 58.2% of cases and a higher percentage in controls (85.5%). Notably, 12.7% of cases had a positive first-degree family history, contrasting with the absence of such history in controls (Table/Fig 1).

Based on TNM staging, tumour morphology among 110 breast cancer patients showed Grade-I tumours with one case having vitamin D <50 nmol/L, two cases with 50 to <75 nmol/L, and none with 75-250 nmol/L (p-value=0.433). For Grade-II tumours, 51 (67.1%) had <50 nmol/L, 20 (26.3%) had 50 to <75 nmol/L, and 5 (6.6%) had 75-250 nmol/L (p-value 0.433). Grade-III tumours had 21 (67.7%) with <50 nmol/L, 8 (25.8%) with 50 to <75 nmol/L, and 2 (6.5%) with 75-250 nmol/L (p-value 0.433). No significant associations between tumour grades and vitamin D levels were found, contributing to understanding the tumour grade-vitamin D status relationship in this patient population.

The genotypes and allele frequencies of FokI, ApaI, and BsmI were illustrated in (Table/Fig 2). In both cases and controls, the HWE of 0.15 indicates equilibrium. In accordance with HWE, genotypic data were found to be reliable, indicating that selection or genetic drift has little influence on the genotypic distribution.

An analysis of FokI VDR polymorphisms yielded the amplification product with a size of 272bp (Table/Fig 3)a. An amplification product without FokI restriction site (F), while present in two or three fragments, indicates FokI restriction site (f). A non digested, single 272bp band genotype FF as homozygous, while Homozygotes (ff) showed two fragments of 198 and 72 bp, and heterozygotes (Ff) showed three fragments of 272, 198, and 72 bp (Table/Fig 3)b. The distribution of polymorphism in VDR FokI showed that 29.1% constituted the Heterozygous Ff, 54.5% were Homozygous FF, and 16.4% presented as homozygous ff cases, whereas the corresponding Control group genotype frequencies were 58.2%, 38.2%, and 3.6%, respectively. There was a significant association between the FokI genotypes FF and 8Ff and breast cancer risk. With a 95% confidence interval (CI), the odds ratios were 5.49 (1.72, 17.64) and 6.00 (1.83, 19.67) with p-values of 0.004 and 0.003.

The examination of the ApaI (rs 7975232) VDR polymorphisms revealed an amplification product with a size of 352bp (Table/Fig 4)a. On agarose gels, 352bp bands were genotyped as AA homozygotes. The homozygote (AA) produces 216bp and 135bp fragments, while heterozygotes (AA) display three fragments, 352bp, 216bp, and 135bp (Table/Fig 4)b. 40.9% were heterozygous Aa, 49.1% were homozygous AA, and 10% were homozygous aa with respect to the Apa1 polymorphism among 110 cases and 110 controls. The ApaI genotypes showed no association with breast cancer risk.

The analysis of BsmI (rs1544410) polymorphisms showed an amplified product size of 825bp (Table/Fig 5)a. Two or three fragments showing the Bsm1 restriction site (b) indicated intact amplification (B) reveals the absence. The undigested bands of 825 bp indicated a homozygous BB genotype. bb homozygotes produced two fragments (650bp and 175bp), and Bb heterozygotes produced three fragments (825bp, 650bp, and 175bp) on agarose gel (Table/Fig 5)b. Bsm1 polymorphism cases comprised 53.6% heterozygous Bb, 42.7% homozygous BB, and 3.7% homozygous bb. Additionally, 47.3%, 50%, and 2.7% of the control groups were genotyped.

A comparative analysis of vitamin D levels in breast cancer patients and the control group indicated mean values and standard deviations. Breast cancer patients had a mean vitamin D level of 43.54±19.58 nmol/L, while the control group had a higher mean of 89.89±26.13 nmol/L. The independent t-test showed a highly significant p-value of <0.001, signifying a substantial difference.

These findings highlight potential biomarkers for breast cancer, suggesting that low levels of vitamin D are related to increased breast cancer risk and lead to implications for diagnosis and prognosis in this patient population.

Moreover, a comparative analysis of genotypes and vitamin D levels in breast cancer patients and the control group, focusing on specific genotypes (FF, Ff, ff for FokI; AA, Aa, aa for ApaI; BB, Bb, bb for BsmI) was conducted. Mean vitamin D levels with standard deviations were assessed for both cases and controls. It shows significance in uncovering potential associations between distinct genetic variations and vitamin D levels. Significant differences in mean Vitamin D levels were observed among both cases (p-value=0.006) and controls (p-value=0.001) for different genotypes of Bsml. The data suggested varying degrees of association between genotypes and vitamin D levels (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

Breast cancer prevails as the predominant cancer in women globally and in India, with an age-adjusted prevalence of 25.8 cases per 100,000 women and a fatality rate of 12.7 per 100,000 women (34). While developed regions still show higher occurrence rates, emerging countries, including India, face increased death rates from breast cancer (35). Age is a significant risk factor, and present study indicates a notable prevalence of 33.6% in women aged 40-49. Tumour size and lymph node involvement are pivotal prognostic factors, with a common occurrence of lymph node infiltration at diagnosis (30-50% of cases). Metropolitan regions, age 50-59, and premenopausal status were prominent in these cases.

Present study revealed a significant association between the FokI genotype and the occurrence of breast cancer within the study population. Specifically, the FF genotype showed a substantial increase in breast cancer risk (OR: 5.49, p-value: 0.004), while the Ff genotype was associated with a significant risk reduction (OR: 6.00, p-value: 0.003). Conversely, the ff genotype was less frequent in the control group compared to the case group. These findings are consistent with Mishra DK et al., study on African American and Hispanic populations, as well as Chakraborty M et al., study within the Indian population, highlighting the elevated risk associated with Fok1 FF and Ff genotypes in breast cancer susceptibility (36),(37). In this study, analysis of the ApaI genotype distribution revealed a lower frequency of AA genotypes in cases (OR: 2.87, p-value: 0.069), with Aa genotypes showing a slightly higher frequency (OR: 2.31, p-value: 0.157). However, no significant association with breast cancer risk was observed for ApaI genotypes. This aligns with the ongoing study by Ahmed JH et al., on the African population, where no significant association was found between the Apa1 polymorphism and the condition under study (28).

Examining BsmI genotypes in present study, it was found that there were no significant associations with breast cancer risk. The ApaI genotypes (Aa and aa) revealed notable differences in vitamin D levels between cases and controls (p-values: 0.316 and 0.001), suggesting a potential relationship with breast cancer. These findings were in line with Reimers LL et al., population-based case-control study conducted on Long Island, New York, emphasising the influence of vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms on breast cancer susceptibility (38). However, BsmI genotypes in present study showed no significant association with vitamin D levels. The p-value for serum vitamin D levels was highly significant at 0.001, signifying a substantial decrease in levels among individuals newly diagnosed with breast cancer compared to those in the healthy control group within our studied population. In a study by Ingles SA et al., African-American women with LS and LL poly(A) variations demonstrated a 50% lower risk of breast cancer than those with the SS genotype, particularly in the presence of the FF (FokI) mutation (39). Whitfield KG et al., study on human fibroblast cell lines highlighted the statistical significance of VDR activity when both FokI and poly(A) genotypes were considered together (40). Present study, aligning with previous research, conducted a comparative analysis of FokI, ApaI, and BsmI genotypes along with vitamin D levels (<50, 50 to <75, and 75 to 250 nmol/L) in breast cancer patients and controls (41),(42). Notably, statistical comparison between the groups for vitamin D levels for those carrying ApaI genotypes (Aa and aa) showed significant differences in vitamin D concentrations in cases and controls, and BsmI genotypes (Bb and bb) showed significant differences in vitamin D concentrations in cases and controls, suggesting that vitamin D status may be influenced by these genotypes.

Limitations

As with any research study, the present study has both strengths and limitations. For the studied analysis, only a few factors were taken into account, and quite a few factors were unmatched. Moreover, only a few VDR polymorphisms are considered for the 5’ and 3’ ends of this gene. Despite these limitations, this study significantly advanced the understanding of VDR polymorphisms (FokI, BsmI, and ApaI genotypes) and breast cancer risk.

Conclusion

This study identifies an association between VDR (FokI) polymorphism FF and Ff genotypes and minimal impact for (BsmI) polymorphism bb genotype in breast cancer susceptibility. These findings could be useful in predicting breast cancer risk or whether a woman who has breast cancer will develop metastases. Highly significant serum vitamin D levels between breast cancer and control groups highlight the significant influence of VDR polymorphisms, particularly FokI, stressing the need for comprehensive studies across diverse ethnic populations to understand VDR gene variations’ impact on breast cancer development thoroughly. Moreover, consideration of prognostic risk factors is needed for therapeutic applications in the context of breast cancer. Vitamin D’s potential preventive role in breast cancer, achievable through safe and affordable supplementation, emphasises its modifiability. The documented link between vitamin D deficiency and increased breast cancer risk underscores its public health significance, necessitating larger-scale investigations. VDR abundance in breast cancer tissues suggests potential treatment targets. Research on VDR FokI polymorphism gains importance, considering its potential moderation by family history.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to express their gratitude to all participants for their invaluable assistance and unwavering patience, as well as to the hospital and institution that played a role in the recruitment of both cases and controls.

References

1.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ali I, Wani WA, Saleem K, Correspondence. Cancer scenario in India with future perspectives. Cancer Ther. 2011;8(8):56-70.
3.
Babu GR, Lakshmi SB, Thiyagarajan JA. Epidemiological correlates of breast cancer in south India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(9):5077-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.9.5077. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Balasubramaniam S, Rotti Sb, Vivekanandam S. Risk factors of female breast carcinoma: A case control study at Puducherry. Indian J Cancer. 2013;50(1):65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509X.112307. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Srinath Reddy K, Shah B, Varghese C, Ramadoss A. Responding to the threat of chronic diseases in India. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1744-49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67343-6. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Abbas S, Linseisen J, Slanger T, Kropp S, Mutschelknauss EJ, Flesch-Janys D, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of post-menopausal breast cancer--Results of a large case-control study. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(1):93-99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgm240. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Crew KD, Gammon MD, Steck SE, Hershman DL, Cremers S, Dworakowski E, et al. Association between plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009;2(6):598-604. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0138. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Lowe LC, Guy M, Mansi JL, Peckitt C, Bliss J, Wilson RG, et al. Plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations, vitamin D receptor genotype and breast cancer risk in a UK Caucasian population. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(8):1164-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.01.017. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
( Haussler MR, Jurutka PW, Mizwicki M, Norman AW. Vitamin D Receptor VDR)-mediated actions of 1α,25(OH)2 vitamin D3: Genomic and non-genomic mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25(4):543-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2011.05.010. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Faiz M, Younus A, Yasmin A. Serum Vitamin D status and VDR (FokI) polymorphism association study in Pakistani females with breast cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023;19(Supplement):S87-S92. Doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1364_20. PMID: 37147988. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Jones G, Strugnell SA, DeLuca HF. Current understanding of the molecular actions of vitamin D. Physiol Rev. 1998;78(4):1193-231. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1998.78.4.1193. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Dogra A, Prakash A, Gupta S, Gupta M, Bhat SA. Genetic variations of vitamin D receptor gene and steroid receptors status in breast cancer risk: An updated review. Adv Biomark Sci Technol. 2022;4(8). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abst.2022.01.001. [crossref]
13.
Morrison NA, Yeoman R, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA. Contribution of trans-acting factor alleles to normal physiological variability: Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and circulating osteocalcin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89(15):6665-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.15.6665. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Gross C, Eccleshall TR, Malloy PJ, Villa ML, Marcus R, Feldman D. The presence of a polymorphism at the translation initiation site of the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with low bone mineral density in postmenopausal Mexican-American women. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11(12):1850-55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650111204. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Yballe CM, Vu TH, Hoffman AR. Imprinting and expression of insulin-like growth factor-II and H19 in normal breast tissue and breast tumour. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(4):1607-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.81.4.8636375. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Engel LS, Orlow I, Sima CS, Satagopan J, Mujumdar U, Roy P, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene haplotypes and polymorphisms and risk of breast cancer: A nested case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(10):1856-67. Available from: doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0551. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Arai H, Miyamoto K, Taketani Y, Yamamoto H, Iemori Y, Morita K, et al. A Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in the translation initiation codon: Effect on protein activity and relation to bone mineral density in Japanese women. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(6):915-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.6.915. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Dogra AK. An updated insights into Vitamin D Receptor gene variation and steroid receptor status in breast cancer risk. New Advances in Medicine and Medical Science B P International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International). 2023;2:64-89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/namms/v2/5569C. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Gnagnarella P, Pasquali E, Serrano D, Raimondi S, Disalvatore D, Gandini S. Vitamin D receptor polymorphism FokI and cancer risk: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(9):1913-19. Available from: doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgu150. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Raimondi S, Pasquali E, Gnagnarella P, Serrano D, Disalvatore D, Johansson HA, et al. BsmI polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene and cancer risk: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Mutat Res. 2014;769:17-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.06.001. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Tang C, Chen N, Wu M, Yuan H, Du Y. Fok1 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene contributes to breast cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117(2):391-99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0262-4. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Wang J, He Q, Shao Y, Ji M, Bao W. Associations between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(6):3823-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0967-9. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
McKay JD, McCullough ML, Ziegler RG, Kraft P, Saltzman BS, Riboli E, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: Results from the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(1):297-305. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0539. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Dorjgochoo T, Delahanty R, Lu W, Long J, Cai Q, Zheng Y, et al. Common genetic variants in the Vitamin D pathway including genome-wide associated variants are not associated with breast cancer risk among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(10):2313-16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0704. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Shahbazi S, Alavi S, Majidzadeh-AK, Ghaffarpour M, Soleimani A, Mahdian R. BsmI but not FokI polymorphism of VDR gene is contributed in breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2013;30(1):393. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0393-7. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Guo B, Jiang X, Hu X, Li F, Chen X. Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and breast cancer in a Chinese population. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(5):8020-24.
27.
Abd-Elsalam EA, Ismaeil NA, Abd-Alsalam HS. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal Egyptian women. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(8):6425-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3332-3. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Ahmed JH, Makonnen E, Fotoohi A, Yimer G, Seifu D, Assefa M, et al. Vitamin D status and association of VDR genetic polymorphism to risk of breast cancer in Ethiopia. Nutrients. 2019;11(2):289. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020289. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
El-Shorbagy HM, Mahmoud NH, Sabet S. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with breast cancer risk in an Egyptian population. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(10):101042831772773. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317727738. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Edge SB, Compton CC. The American joint committee on cancer: The 8th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1471-74. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al; Endocrine Society. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911-30. Doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. Epub 2011 Jun 6. Erratum in: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Dec;96(12):3908. PMID: 21646368. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Raza S, Dhasmana A, Bhatt MLB, Lohani M, Arif JM. Molecular mechanism of cancer susceptibility associated with Fok1 single nucleotide polymorphism of VDR in relation to breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(1):199-206. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.1.199 [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Raza, S, Jahan R, Dhasmana A, Brahma Bhatt ML, Lohani M, Arif JM. Vitamin D receptor gene Bsm1 polymorphism and risk of breast cancer. Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 2017;17(2):657-63.
34.
Malvia S, Bagadi SA, Dubey US, Saxena S. Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(4):289-95. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Ghoncheh M, Pournamdar Z, Salehiniya H. Incidence and mortality and epidemiology of breast cancer in the world. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):43-46. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Mishra DK, Wu Y, Sarkissyan M, Sarkissyan S, Chen Z, Shang X, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and prognosis of breast cancer among African-American and Hispanic Women. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57967. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Chakraborty M, Arora M, Ramteke A, Yadav V, Naaz H, Muntakhab M, et al. FokI polymorphism of Vitamin D receptor gene and deficiency of serum Vitamin D increases the risk of breast cancer in North Indian women. Endocrine. 2023;81(1):168-74. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Reimers LL, Crew KD, Bradshaw PT, Santella RM, Steck SE, Sirosh I, et al. Vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms, plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(2):187-203. Doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0497-9. Epub 2014 Nov 25. PMID: 25421379; PMCID: PMC4302042. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Ingles SA, Haile R, Henderson B, Kolonel L, Coetzee G. Association of vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphism with breast cancer risk in African-American and Hispanic women. In: Norman AW, Bouillon R, Thomasset M, editors. Vitamin D: Chemistry, biology and clinical applications of the steroid hormone. Riverside, CA: University of California; 1997:813-14.
40.
Whitfield GK, Remus LS, Jurutka PW, Zitzer H, Oza AK, Dang HT, et al. Functionally relevant polymorphisms in the human nuclear vitamin D receptor gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;177(1-2):145-59. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Yao S, Zirpoli G, Bovbjerg DH, Jandorf L, Hong CC, Zhao H, et al. Variants in the vitamin D pathway, serum levels of vitamin D, and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer among African-American women: A case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(2):R58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3162. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Gohar SF, Al-Hassanin S, Montaser B, Soliman S. Association of serum vitamin D Level and vitamin D receptor polymorphism (Apa 1) and breast cancer. Annals Ann Oncol. 2018;29(9):ix7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/ mdy426.020.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69296.19241

Date of Submission: Jan 01, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jan 30, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Feb 29, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 01, 2024
• Manual Googling: Feb 02, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Feb 27, 2024 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com