Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 22473

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : DC05 - DC09 Full Version

Declining Trend of HIV Seroprevalence in Pregnant Women: A Retrospective Observational Analysis of 12 Years’ Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66295.19229
Meena Mishra, Varsha Wanjare, Seema Agrawal, Ms Qazi, Sunanda Shrikhande, Arvind Kurhade, Suresh Ughade, Soumyabrata Nag

1. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, AIIMS, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 6. Retired Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 7. Retired Statistician, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 8. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, AIIMS, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Meena Mishra,
Tower-2, Flat No. 702, Capitol Heights, Rambagh Road, Medical Square, Nagpur-440003, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: meenarishika@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Introduction: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection among antenatal women has been reported throughout the country, with a relatively high prevalence in the state of Maharashtra. Data on HIV seroprevalence in antenatal women serve as an indirect indicator of the HIV epidemic's burden in the general population and aid in predicting the same in young children. Diagnostic and treatment services for HIV are concentrated in selected states and districts with high seroprevalence, making it necessary to accurately calculate the prevalence of HIV.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of Prevention of Parent-to-Child Transmission (PPTCT) services and to study the effectiveness of the National Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Control Programme (NACP) in the functioning of PPTCT services.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational analysis of 12-year data, from January 2007 to December 2018, was conducted in the Department of Microbiology at the Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, representing Central India. Data collection took place from June 2019 to December 2019, and analysis occurred over the subsequent two months (January 2020 to February 2020). The total sample size was 101,865 patients. All pregnant women registered in the Antenatal Clinic (ANC) under the PPTCT Program were included in the present study, and Strategy III of the National HIV testing algorithm was followed. The women's ages, their partners' serostatus, and records of babies born to HIV seropositive mothers were obtained and analysed. The statistical analysis of the data was performed using Stata (version 10.4.2009, STATA Corp., Texas, USA) and Epi Info 7 (version 7.1.06, 2012, CDC, Atlanta, USA), employing the Chi-square test for linear trend (Extended Mantel-Haenszel). A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The seroprevalence of HIV infection among pregnant women was 1.04% in 2007, decreasing to 0.23% by 2017. In 2009, 88.9% of women were counselled, and 100% were tested for HIV, with pretest counselling steadily increasing to 100% by 2012. The trend in HIV testing, however, remained at 100% over the span of 10 years. Post-test counselling varied from 89.6% to 99.9%, whereas the trend of HIV testing among partners fluctuated from 50% to 94.44%. The overall HIV positivity among babies, after 18 months of follow-up, was 4.77%.

Conclusion: The HIV seroprevalence among the pregnant population is steadily declining. More and more women are availing themselves of the facilities at Integrated Counselling and Testing Centre (ICTC). Intensive health education and the availability of diagnostic and therapeutic services across the country have reduced the burden of the HIV/AIDS problem in the country.

Keywords

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus, Infectious disease transmission vertical, Prevention of parent-to-child transmission

The technical report of the National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO) on HIV estimations 2017 in India shows that significant progress has been made in halting and reversing the epidemic. The total number of People Living with HIV (PLHIV) in India was estimated at 21.40 (15.90-28.39) lacs by the end of 2017 (1). With 3.30 (2.531-4.353) lacs PLHIV, Maharashtra had the highest number of PLHIV, contributing 15% to the total PLHIV size in the country (1). According to the recently released HIV estimation 2017 report of India, the national adult (15-49 years) HIV prevalence was estimated to be 0.22% (0.16-0.30) in 2017, with adult HIV prevalence estimated at 0.25% among males and 0.19% among females. Maharashtra has shown an estimated adult HIV prevalence of 0.33% (0.25-0.45), which is greater than the national prevalence. Children (<15 years) account for 0.61 (0.43-0.85) lac, approximately 3% of cases in India (1).

Though the incidence of infection, especially in the sexually active group, is the most sensitive marker to monitor the HIV epidemic, it is difficult to measure the incidence. However, the prevalence in young women is an indirect but useful tool (2). Hence, the data on HIV from antenatal women is used to monitor the trends in the general population, and it also helps in predicting the seroprevalence in young children (3),(4). As cited in the HIV Annual Report of 2015-2016 by NACO, according to the HIV Sentinel Surveillance (HSS) 2014-15, in the Antenatal Clinic (ANC) attendees, the overall prevalence was found to be 0.29% (5). Sangal B et al., (2018) studied the HIV prevalence rates from HSS during 2003-2015 and reported a significant decline in HIV seroprevalence from 0.93% in 2003 to 0.36% in 2015 (p<0.001) at the national level (6). They also reported a significant rising trend of HIV seroprevalence in Northern India from 0.16% in 2003 to 0.33% in 2015, whereas reported significant declining trends from 0.43% in 2003 to 0.16% in 2015 from Central India. They observed a similar declining trend in southern and western India (6). The prevalence in Maharashtra is estimated to be 0.26% among the attendees of ANC in 2017 (7).

The burden of HIV in pregnant women and children reflects the overall HIV epidemic in India. The epidemic in India is concentrated in some states and districts; therefore, diagnostic and treatment services are concentrated in these areas (5). These services are limited in the rest of the country; hence, it is necessary to accurately calculate the prevalence of HIV (8). Various authors have studied and evaluated the utility of different surveillance methodologies used to estimate HIV prevalence (9),(10),(11),(12),(13). The PPTCT of HIV program was launched under the NACP to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV, and it is the largest national antenatal screening program in the world (4). The uniqueness of the study lies in assessing the data of 101,865 patients to demonstrate a declining rate of HIV seropositivity.

The present study is a retrospective analysis of 12 years of data reflecting the extensive work done on antenatal mothers, showing the efforts made under NACP III/IV and the resulting outcomes achieved after targeted interventions in the NACP. The analysis aimed to discern the data on HIV prevalence in and around Nagpur, representing Central India.

The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of PPTCT services and to study the effectiveness of the NACP in the functioning of PPTCT services. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of HIV in pregnant women attending the Integrated Counselling and Testing Centre located in Nagpur, representing Central India, under the HIV (PPTCT) program. Also, a comparison of HIV seroprevalence India, Maharashtra State, and Nagpur was done. The secondary objective was to detect the HIV seropositivity of babies born to HIV seropositive mothers.

Material and Methods

This retrospective observational analysis covers data from a 12-year period, from January 2007 to December 2018, in the Department of Microbiology at the Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, representing Central India, which includes both the phases of NACP-III (2007-2012) and IV (2012-2017). Institutional ethical clearance was obtained (No.1035/EC/Pharmac/GMC/NGP). The NACO guidelines of pre-test counselling, written informed consent, and post-test counselling were followed (14). Data collection was conducted from June 2019 to December 2019 and was analysed over the following two months (January 2020 to February 2020). The sample size was not pre-determined as the data was taken from past records. The partners of those women who were seropositive were offered HIV testing.

Inclusion criteria: All attendees (pregnant women and partners of seropositive women) who gave consent for testing were included in the study. The babies of seropositive mothers were also included after obtaining consent from their guardians.

Exclusion criteria: All other HIV seropositive patients were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

All pregnant women registered in the ANC are routinely given group counseling for HIV testing under the PPTCT Program. The data of antenatal mothers attending the ANC were collected, comprising comprehensive data from 101,865 patients.

The purpose of NACO Strategy III is to diagnose HIV in asymptomatic individuals, such as antenatal women, for screening. The National HIV testing algorithm, Strategy III, was followed (5). According to it, an antenatal woman with positive results in all three tests was labelled HIV seropositive. The record of the babies born to HIV seropositive mothers was obtained. All data parameters were entered into Microsoft Excel to perform a descriptive analysis.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis of the data was conducted using STATA (version 10.4.2009, STATA Corp., Texas, USA) and Epi Info 7 (version 7.1.06, 2012, CDC, Atlanta, USA). The Chi-square test for linear trend (Extended Mantel-Haenszel) was used. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 101,865 pregnant females were tested for the detection of HIV antibodies over a period of 12 years, from January 2007 to December 2018, among which 475 (0.47%; 95% CI, 0.43-0.51) tested positive for HIV antibodies. The seroprevalence of HIV infection among pregnant women was 79 (1.04%) in 2007, which decreased to 24 (0.23%) by 2017. (Table/Fig 1) shows the distribution of year-wise samples tested and the HIV positivity. HIV testing of ANC mothers comes under PPTCT services. The declining trend of HIV seropositivity among ANC mothers, as shown in (Table/Fig 1), reflects the effectiveness of the implementation of PPTCT services. This gradual decline in the positivity rate in the study period was statistically significant (Chi-square test of linear trend: p-value <0.0001).

The comparison of the various trends reported by the Sentinel Surveillance conducted by NACO at the national level, in Maharashtra state, and Nagpur region representing Central India, has been depicted in (Table/Fig 2).

Out of the 475, the maximum number of antenatal mothers were in the age group of 25-34 years, i.e., 230 (48.42%), followed by the age group 15-24 years, i.e., 223 (46.95%), with 22 (4.63%) cases in the 35-49 years age group (Table/Fig 3).

Around 88.9% of women were counselled, and 100% were tested for HIV in 2009, and the pretest counselling trend steadily increased to 100% by 2012. The HIV testing trend, however, remained at 100% throughout the last 10 years. Post-test counselling trends ranged from 89.6% to 99.9%.

Partners of HIV-positive mothers were also tested as part of contact tracing, and HIV testing among them fluctuated from 50% to 94.44% (Table/Fig 4).

Follow-up testing of babies born to HIV-positive mothers was conducted until 18 months, as per NACO guidelines, and the overall HIV positivity among them was 4.77% (Table/Fig 5).

The present study period includes both the phases of NACP-III (2007-2012) and NACP-IV (2012-2017). The maximum seropositivity was seen in the year 2007, i.e., 1.04%, which gradually and steadily declined to 0.32% in the year 2012. The data from the year 2013 to 2016 showed a steady decline from 0.25% in 2013 to 0.19% in the year 2016. However, a steady increase in seroprevalence was seen in 2017 (0.23%) and 2018 (0.36%), which is indeed alarming. NACP IV targeted intensifying and consolidating prevention services with a focus on high-risk groups and vulnerable populations.

Discussion

The seroprevalence of HIV in antenatal mothers serves as a surrogate marker to assess the HIV epidemic in the general population [5,7]. The present study demonstrates a gradual and steady decline in HIV seroprevalence among antenatal mothers from 2007 to 2012, coinciding with the NACP phase III program. This program aimed to halt and reverse the HIV epidemic in India over a five-year period by scaling up prevention efforts among high-risk groups and the general population, as well as integrating care, support, and treatment services. Sarkate P et al., reported a declining trend from 2008 to 2012, with an overall 0.88% seroprevalence rate from Mumbai (15). Kulkarni S and Doibale M reported a significant decline in seropositivity from 1.58% in 2007 to 0.54% in 2011 (16). In the present study, a comparison of HIV seroprevalence has been done between Nagpur, the entire state of Maharashtra, and India as a whole too. Maharashtra is a big state, and HIV prevalence varies in different districts of the state, so we compared the HIV prevalence of Nagpur to the entire state. Also, Nagpur receives a patient pool from the adjacent states of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, so it is more representative of Central India. The declining trend in HIV seropositivity was consistent across all levels (national and state), and it aligns with the results of the present study, as depicted in (Table/Fig 2). The seroprevalence of HIV in various regions of India has been listed in (Table/Fig 6) (16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26).

According to the HSS 2016-17 report, the observed HIV prevalence was 0.28% (95% CI: 0.26-0.29) among attendees of ANC (7). The overall prevalence in ANCs in India declined from 0.49% in 2007 to 0.35% in 2012-13, 0.29% in 2014-2015, and 0.28% in 2017 in the present study, indicating a decreasing trend in HIV seroprevalence among ANC attendees at the national level, including in states with previously high prevalence such as Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Manipur, all of which recorded a prevalence of 0.25%-0.50% in 2017 (7). Studies from Gujarat by Joshi U et al., and Patel BS et al., found the seropositivity of babies at 18 months to be 3.6% and 2% (3 babies out of 148), respectively, slightly lower than in the present study (27),(28).

Critical epidemiological estimates such as adult HIV prevalence, HIV population size, HIV incidence, annual new HIV infections, annual AIDS-related deaths, and the need for PMTCT of HIV services are generated at national and state/Union Territory levels. Adult prevalence and HIV population estimates provide insight into the status of HIV in the geographic area: its level, trend, and overall burden of disease at the inter-state level.

The indicator of annual new HIV infections highlights the impacts of the prevention program and identifies areas where new infections are estimated to be increasing or not declining as rapidly as needed to achieve the targets of a 75% decline in annual new HIV infections from 2010-2020, which are areas of concern requiring scaled-up HIV prevention efforts. Estimates of AIDS-related deaths indicate the impact of treatment services and the need for increased efforts in this area. PMTCT need is also a critical indicator, and for India to achieve the national goal of eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV by 2020, 95% of pregnant women in need of PMTCT must be receiving treatment (29),(30).

Screening pregnant women for HIV serostatus has many implications. Tracking HIV prevalence among pregnant women has been considered a good proxy for tracking the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the general population, as pregnant women are representative of the healthy population (5),(7).

This allows for early initiation of treatment in the mother, resulting in the decrease of her viral load, thus minimising the probability of transmission to the child. It also enables early detection and intervention in case of transmission, thereby reducing the likelihood of the child developing the disease.

Limitation(s)

While the present study was exhaustive, the authors encountered a few limitations. They were unable to trace the data of all the partners of the HIV-positive mothers and their babies.

Conclusion

A declining trend of HIV-positivity among pregnant women, along with an increasing number of women availing of ICTC services, is a welcome sign in our fight against AIDS. While success in high-prevalence pockets has been well-demonstrated, the same is not as evident in low-prevalence pockets, making it much more challenging to substantially reduce prevalence in these areas. However, as India aims to end the AIDS epidemic as a public health threat by 2030 as part of its sustainable development goals, the imminent need to scale up the current momentum of interventions in low-prevalence states cannot be underestimated. Furthermore, the heterogeneity in the national and regional epidemic scenario necessitates the implementation of tailored interventions to address the determinants of HIV, informed by the analysis of local risks operating at various levels.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policies, or views of the NACO.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the contributions of NACO and Maharashtra State AIDS Control Society (MSACS) for providing the kits for HIV testing.

References

1.
( National AIDS Control Organization & ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics 2018). HIV Estimations 2017: Technical Report. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: https://naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/HIV%20Estimations%202017%20Report_1.pdf.
2.
Kumar R, Jha P, Arora P, Mony P, Bhatia P, Millson P, et al. Trends in HIV-1 in young adults in south India from 2000 to 2004: A prevalence study. Lancet. 2006;367(9517):1164-72. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Zaba B, Boerma T, White R. Monitoring the AIDS epidemic using HIV prevalence data among young women attending antenatal clinics: Prospects and problems. AIDS. 2000;14(11):1633-45. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Boerma JT, Ghys PD, Walker N. Estimates of HIV-1 prevalence from national population-based surveys as a new gold standard. Lancet. 2003;362(9399):1929-31. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), Government of India (GOI) Annual Report 2015-16. Available from: https://naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annual%20Report%202015-16.pdf accessed on January 2022.
6.
Sangal B, Kumar P, Dhingra N. HIV prevalence trend from HIV sentinel surveillance over a decade in India: An overview. Indian J Public Health. 2018;62:138-42. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
HIV sentinel surveillance 2016-17 technical brief, December 2017, National AIDS Control Organization, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. GoI/NACO/MES/HSS2016-17/011217. Available from: https://naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/HIV%20SENTINEL%20SURVEILLANCE_06_12_2017_0.pdf accessed on January 2022.
8.
National Strategic Plan, Multi-Drug ARV for Prevention of Parent to Child Transmission of HIV (PPTCT) under National AIDS Control Programme in India, 2013. Available from: https://lms.naco.gov.in/frontend/content/National_Guidelines_for_PPTCT.pdf.
9.
Michelo C, Sandøy I, Fylkesnes K. Antenatal clinic HIV data found to underestimate actual prevalence declines: Evidence from Zambia. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:171-79. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Gouws E, Mishra V, Fowler TB. Comparison of adult HIV prevalence from national population-based surveys and antenatal clinic surveillance in countries with generalised epidemics: Implications for calibrating surveillance data. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(Suppl 1):i17-i23. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Fylkesnes K, Ndhlovu Z, Kasumba K, Musonda RM, Sichone M. Studying dynamics of the HIV epidemic: Population-based data compared with sentinel surveillance in Zambia. AIDS. 1998;12:1227-34. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kwesigabo G, Killewo JZ, Sandstrom A. Sentinel surveillance and cross sectional survey on HIV infection prevalence: A comparative study. East Afr Med J. 1996;73:298-302.
13.
Sgaier SK, Gupta RS, Rao R, Gaikwad A, Harangule S, Dhamne S, et al. Prevention of Parent to Child Transmission (PPTCT) program data in India: An emerging data set for appraising the HIV epidemic. PLoS One 2012;7:e48827. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
National guidelines for HIV testing manual- July 2015. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India: National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), New Delhi. Available from: http://www.naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/National_Guidelines_ for_HIV_Testing_21Apr2016.pdf, accessed on March 24, 2016.
15.
Sarkate P, Paranjpe S, Ingole N, Mehta P. Monitoring HIV epidemic in pregnant women: Are the current measures enough? J Sex Transm Dis. 2015;2015:194831. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kulkarni S, Doibale M. Trend of seroprevalence of HIV among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Basic Appl Med Sci. 2013;3:257-62.
17.
Sibia P, Mohi MK, Kumar A. Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus among antenatal women in one of the Institute of Northern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:QC08-09. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Ashtagi GS, Metgud CS, Walvekar PR, Naik VA. Prevalence of HIV among rural pregnant women attending PPTCT services at KLE Hospital, Belgaum. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2011;4:45-48.
19.
Pawan MU, Suresh LA, Rajaram MP. Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in pregnancy in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Med Sci. 2005;59:382-87. [crossref]
20.
Gupta S, Gupta R, Singh S. Seroprevalence of HIV in pregnant women in North India: A tertiary care hospital based study. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:01-05. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Snehamay C, Sudipta B, Arunansu T, Sankar GU. Seroprevalence and utilization of therapeutic intervention in PPTCT services in a teaching hospital in Kolkata. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2007;57:251-56.
22.
Parameshwari S, Jacob MS, Vijayakumari JJ, Shalini D, Sushi MK, Sivakumar MR. A program on prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV at government hospital, Tiruchengodetaluk, Namakkal district. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34:261-63. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Kwatra A, Bangal VB, Shinde K, Padaliya K. HIV seroprevalence among the pregnant population and utilisation of integrated counselling and training centre facilities at a teaching hospital in rural Maharashtra. Australas Medical J. 2011;4(10):566-70. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Devi A, Shyamala R. The study of seroprevalence of HIV in pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital. Pharm Lett. 2012;4:1835-36.
25.
Dash M, Mohanty I, Sahu S, Narasimham M, Padhi S, Panda P. Declining HIV seroprevalence among pregnant women in south Odisha, India: A six and half year tertiary care hospital based study. Int J Biomed Adv Res. 2012;3(7):546-51. [crossref]
26.
Mehta KD, Antala S, Mistry M, Goswami Y. Seropositivity of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, syphilis, and HIV in antenatal women in India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7(11):832-37. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Joshi U, Kadri A, Bhojiya S. Prevention of parent to child transmission services and interventions-coverage and utilization: A cohort analysis in Gujarat, India. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2010;31(2):92-98. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Patel BS, Patel AB, Patel AJ, Shah PT, Patel MB. Pregnancy outcomes in HIV-infected women: our experience at a tertiary health-care center, Ahmedabad, Western India. Am Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci. 2020;70(1):130-38.
29.
National AIDS Control Organization & ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (2020). India HIV Estimates 2019: Report. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: http://naco. gov.in/sites/default/ files/INDIA%20HIV%20ESTIMATES.pdf.
30.
National AIDS Control Organization (2020). Sankalak: Status of National AIDS Response (Second edition, 2020). New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66295.19229

Date of Submission: Jun 30, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 11, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 05, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 04, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 09, 2024 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com