Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 118613

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : EC13 - EC18 Full Version

Expression of GATA3, p63, E-cadherin and Her2Neu Immunohistochemical Stains in Urothelial Carcinoma and their Relationship with Histological Grading and Prognosis- A Cross-sectional Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66758.19329
Debarghya Mukherjee, Soumya Dey, Souvik Chatterjee, Madhumita Mondal, Deepali Singh, Mamata Guha Mallick Sinha

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 5. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 6. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Madhumita Mondal,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata-700001, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: rgkarmadhumita@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary bladder cancer is the 10th most common cancer worldwide. Cystoscopy and biopsy/Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (TURBT) are the best techniques for diagnosing and staging urinary bladder cancers. Urothelial Carcinomas (UC), particularly in transurethral resection biopsies, can pose diagnostic difficulties due to limited material. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a valuable role in these settings, and many immunostains are being utilised for diagnostic evaluation. However, the relationship of these immunomarkers with histological grade and their prognostic utility has not been adequately explored.

Aim: To analyse expression of Her2Neu, E-cadherin, p63, and GATA3 in UC and its relation with histological grading and prognosis.

Materials and Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted in the Pathology Department of IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India over two years (November 2020-October 2022). Samples of 100 bladder carcinoma patients with predominant TURBT specimens were included in the study. The histopathological reports and tumour grading were done according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of urinary bladder tumours. The Formalin Fixed Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of the tumour blocks were subjected to IHC staining, and the results were interpreted accordingly. Statistical analysis was performed with the help of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), IBM (version 25.0). Unpaired t-test and Z-test (Standard Normal Deviate) were used to test the significant difference between two proportions.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 59.69±14.53 years, and there was a male preponderance (male: female=3.54:1). Histopathological examination revealed 55% to be of low-grade morphology. Overall, 53% of cases were in T1 stage, and the rest were in T2 stage. On IHC analysis, E-cadherin showed a statistically significant decrease in intensity with increasing grade (p-value <0.001) and T stage of UC (p-value <0.001), but there was no statistically significant relationship between Her2Neu expression and tumour grade/stage (p-value 0.5764 and 0.5663, respectively). A statistically significant relationship was observed between GATA3 and p63 scores with the grade and T stage of the tumour, i.e., GATA3 positivity increased with increasing grade and T stage of the tumour (p-value <0.001 in both), and there was a loss of p63 with advancing grade and stage of the tumour (p-value <0.001 in both).

Conclusion: GATA3, p63, and E-cadherin can be used as prognostic markers in UCs. No significant relationship was found between Her2Neu expression and tumour grade in UC.

Keywords

Immunohistochemistry, Paraffin, Transurethral resection

Urinary bladder cancer is the 10th most common cancer worldwide with an ever-increasing number of patients every year globally and in India as well (1). A number of causative factors, including smoking and occupational exposure to aromatic amines, arsenic, phenacetin use, pelvic radiation, Schistosoma infection, and certain inherited cancer syndromes, have been implicated in the pathogenesis (2). There is a male preponderance, and the mean age group is 60-70 years (2). Early and accurate diagnosis by conventional histopathology as well as immunohistochemical markers helps in early intervention and modification in the disease course. Despite proven diagnostic utility, the prognostic role and clinicopathological relationship of these immunomarkers are still not properly established, and limited studies are available in the literature. Overexpression of Her2Neu is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. However, the clinical relevance of Her2Neu in bladder cancer remains ambiguous and under-investigated (3). GATA3, as a sensitive and specific marker for UC, can be effectively used to exclude other genitourinary malignancies, such as prostate carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma, at the metastatic site. This marker can also be effectively used in predicting the probable grade and invasion in biopsy material with poor morphological characteristics, thereby helping in appropriate management in such cases (4). The p63 immunostaining has utility in UC as it is one of the genes strongly deregulated in early stages of UC (5). Different studies have shown that decreased E-cadherin expression is associated with an increased grade of UC and loss of adhesion molecule expression, thus helping in prognostication and severity of UC (6).

The aim of the study was to analyse the expression of Her2Neu, E-cadherin, GATA3, and p63 in UC and its relation with histological grading and prognosis.

Material and Methods

The present study was a observational cross-sectional conducted in the Department of Pathology in collaboration with the Department of Urology at IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India over a peroid of two years from November 2020-October 2022. It was an observational cross-sectional study, The ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IPGME&R/IEC/2021/018). Total 100 patients were chosen for the study. These patients underwent Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (TURBT) (90%) or radical cystectomy (10%).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The diagnosed cases of invasive UC of the bladder in TURBT samples and radical cystectomy specimens were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were: 1) Non neoplastic lesions of the bladder (inflammatory cases, etc.); 2) Bladder carcinomas other than UC, including metastatic carcinoma; or 3) Non representative samples of neoplasm of the bladder (extensive necrosis). In present study, most of the samples were from TURBT. Therefore, the adequacy of received samples was an important aspect for sample processing and reporting. However, those samples that were adequate for the study were included in the analysis.

Study Procedure

Whenever a TURBT or bladder resection specimen of a suspected case of bladder carcinoma with relevant clinical features and suspicious cystoscopy findings was received from the Urology Department, the patient was approached for necessary consent. All those samples underwent Histopathological Examination, and thus, 100 histologically proven cases of urinary bladder UC were included in the study. The following parameters were examined during histopathological assessment: cases of invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (invasion of the basement membrane), presence of invasion of the lamina propria, invasion of muscularis propria, histological grade of the tumour, histological variant/divergent differentiation of invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma, tumour stage, necrosis, Lympho-vascular Invasion (LVI), Perineural Invasion (PNI) (Table/Fig 1)a-f. Later, IHC staining for GATA3, p63, E-cadherin, and Her2Neu was performed on the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of the representative tumour blocks. Desmin IHC was done on challenging cases to pick up muscle invasion. According to the WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs 2016, the muscle-invasive (pT2), in-situ and lamina propria invasive tumours (pT1), the histological grading was determined based on striking nuclear pleomorphism with hyperchromasia, brisk mitotic activity, distinct squamoid appearance, and fused papillary structures or a sheet-like pattern (7).

The prognostic roles of E-cadherin, GATA3, p63, and Her2Neu were assessed by comparing their relationship with prognostic and predictive factors in bladder carcinomas, such as histological grading and tumour staging. Overall survival analysis was not conducted.

Interpretation of IHC: The E-cadherin rabbit monoclonal antibody of the EP6 clone was used, with colon cancer tissue serving as the positive control. For Desmin, a mouse monoclonal antibody of subclass-IgG1/k was used, and skeletal muscle tissue was used as the positive control. The rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 was used for Her2Neu interpretation, with a case of breast carcinoma known to be Her2Neu positive used as the positive control. Negative control was achieved by omitting the primary antibody. The GATA3 mouse monoclonal antibody L50-823 was used, with a known case of bladder transitional cell carcinoma serving as the positive control. For p63, the rabbit monoclonal anti-p63 antibody was employed, and prostate tissue was taken as the positive control. The Her2Neu IHC scoring patterns as per (Table/Fig 2) were followed.

For Her2Neu, both the membranous pattern of staining in the percentage of tumour cells and intensity were considered (8). For GATA3 and E-cadherin, the following scoring patterns as outlined in (Table/Fig 3) were followed.

For E-cadherin, a membranous staining pattern was considered positive, and for GATA3, nuclear staining was considered positive [9,10]. The final immunoreactivity scores were calculated by multiplying the staining intensity score and percentage score, with the highest value being 12. Based on the degree of staining of E-cadherin, the cases were classified into three groups: Group-I (negative)-score 0-2, Group-II (weakly positive)-score 3-6, Group-III (strongly positive)-score ≥7 (10). For GATA3, the final immunoreactivity scores were further subdivided into four groups: Group-I (negative)-score 0-1, Group-II (weakly positive)-score 2-4, Group-III (moderately positive)-score 5-8, Group-IV (strongly positive)-score 9-12 (9).

For p63, the nuclear staining pattern of tumour cells was considered, and the intensity of staining corresponded to negative, weak, moderate, and strong intensity. The percentage of tumour cells was scored as follows: 0-no reactivity, 1-less than 10% of cancer cell nuclei positive, 2-10-25% positive, 3-25-50% positive, 4-50-75% positive, 5-75-90% positive, and 6-more than 90% of tumour cell nuclei positive (11).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the help of IBM SPSS software (version 25). Using this software, basic cross-tabulation, inferences, and associations were conducted. The unpaired t-test was used to test the association of different study variables. The Z-test (Standard Normal Deviate) was used to test the significant difference between two proportions. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 100 cases of invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma were studied, with the most common age group being 51-70 years (44% of cases), and the mean age was 59.69±14.53 years, ranging from 25-82 years. There were 78 male cases and 22 female cases, indicating a male predominance (78%) with a male to female ratio of 3.54:1. Detailed histories were taken from the patients regarding pesticide and aniline dye exposure, but a positive history of such exposures was absent. Addiction was identified as a major risk factor, with 60 patients being addicted, primarily to smoking. In addition to smoking, other forms of tobacco exposure such as oral tobacco and alcohol intake were also present. Patients typically presented with mixed clinical features, with the most common symptom being haematuria. 56% of patients presented with painless haematuria, and 15% presented with haematuria associated with dysuria, resulting in 71% of patients presenting with haematuria. Dysuria was the next most common symptom, with 20% presenting with isolated dysuria and 15% with dysuria associated with haematuria. Other symptoms included urgency (3%) and nocturia (6%).

In the study, the most common specimen type was only TURBT (Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour) in 90% of cases, while 10% were radical cystectomy specimens. 74% of samples were greater than 5cc during gross processing. Of the cases, 45% belonged to high-grade tumours and 55% belonged to low-grade tumours. Depth of invasion was greater than 1.5 mm in 54 cases and less than 1.5 mm in 46 cases. 53% of cases were of T1 (low) stage, with the remaining 47% at a higher stage (T2). Among these patients, 38% had a carcinoma in situ component.

In the study, 16% of cases had Lymphovascular Invasion (LVI), while the majority (84%) had no LVI. All cases of LVI were associated with high-grade urothelial carcinoma, and no low-grade cases showed the presence of LVI. 5% of patients had both LVI and Perineural Invasion (PNI).

The majority (94 cases) showed no PNI, while only six cases showed PNI, all of which were observed in high-grade tumours.

In present study, 74% of cases showed positive Her2Neu expression, while 26% showed negative Her2Neu expression. Additionally, 17% showed a score of 0 (negative), 9% showed a score of 1+ (negative), 55% showed a score of 2+, and 19% showed a score of 3+. There was no statistical relationship between HER2 Neu score and the grade of UC (p=0.5764). The relationship between Her2Neu expression and tumour stage (T stage) was also not statistically significant (p=0.5663) (Table/Fig 4).

The E-cadherin values of high-grade and low-grade UC patients were compared using an unpaired t-test with two tails, resulting in a p-value of <0.001, which was statistically significant. Similarly, when comparing the E-cadherin values in patients with T1 and T2 stages of UC, the p-value was <0.001, also showing statistical significance (Table/Fig 5). Therefore, with an increase in grade and T stage, there was a decrease in E-cadherin expression score. One UC case with 3+ Her2Neu positivity and two UC cases with total E-cadherin scores of 12 and 2 are shown in (Table/Fig 6)a,d.

In the study, the scores of GATA3 in high-grade and low-grade tumours respectively were as follows: negative (0 cases in HG/13 cases in LG), weakly positive (26 cases in HG/27 cases in LG), moderately positive (0 cases in HG/4 cases in LG), strongly positive (19 cases in HG/11 cases in LG). This clearly indicated that GATA3 score increased with the increasing grade of the tumour, which was also statistically significant (p-value <0.001). The GATA3 scoring was also compared with the UC tumour stages (T stage), showing that higher stages were associated with increased GATA3 scores (p-value <0.001) (Table/Fig 7). Two urothelial carcinoma cases with total GATA3 scores of 12 and 6 are shown in (Table/Fig 8)a,b.

In the study, a statistically significant relationship was observed between p63 score and the grade of the tumour (p=<0.001). As the grade of the tumour increased, the p63 score declined, indicating a loss of p63 with the advancing grade of the tumour. p63 scores also had a statistically significant relationship with tumour stages (T stage), suggesting that p63 expression is mostly limited to the low-grade and lower-stage UCs (Table/Fig 9). Two UC cases with p63 scores of 3+ and 6+ are shown in (Table/Fig 8)c,d.

Discussion

Urinary bladder carcinoma is a common multistage progressive malignancy, ranking 10th in worldwide cancer incidence and responsible for significant mortality and morbidity. In the past few decades, many studies have explored the prognostic value of various biomarkers involved in the molecular pathogenesis of bladder cancer (8),(9),(10),(11).

In the present study, of the total 100 cases of invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma, the most common age group was 51-70 years (44% of cases), with a mean age of 59.69±14.53 years, a median age of 60.50 years, and ranging from 25-82 years. According to WHO 2016, the median patient age at diagnosis is 65-70 years (2). The present study was consistent with previous studies regarding the age distribution of bladder carcinoma, with mean ages ranging from 55.9 to 68.32 years (4),(8),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15). In present study, out of 100 cases, 78 were males and 22 were females. Thus, a male predominance (78%) was observed, with a male to female ratio of 3.54:1. The study was in line with available literature regarding the sex distribution of urothelial bladder carcinoma, all of which found male preponderance (4),(8),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17).

Total 71% of patients presented with haematuria, with dysuria being the next most common symptom. These results were similar to previous studies which also showed haematuria as the most common symptom (4),(12),(13),(18). In present study, the most common specimen type was only Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (TURBT) in 90% of cases, while 10% were radical cystectomy specimens. The study findings were consistent with those of Wang L et al., where TURBT specimens constituted about 86% of the sample size, and Asmi ATS and Madathiveetil S reported 64% of samples as TURBT (17),(18).

In present study, the majority (55 cases) belonged to low-grade tumours, while (45 cases) belonged to high-grade tumours. Features like necrosis, LVI, and PNI were noted in high-grade tumours only. These findings were consistent with the results of Asmi ATS and Madathiveetil S, where the majority of cases (66.67%) were low-grade tumours and 33.33% were high-grade tumours (17). Depth of invasion was defined as the distance from the deepest level of invasion to the reconstructed mucosal surface. A 1.5 mm depth of invasion predicted advanced-stage bladder carcinoma at cystectomy with a sensitivity of 81%, a specificity of 83%, and positive and negative predictive values of 95% and 56%, respectively. Total 95% of patients with a depth of invasion of 1.5 mm at TUR specimens had advanced-stage (pT2) bladder carcinoma at cystectomy (19). In practice, authors measured the depth of invasion by calculating the number of fields examined multiplied by the field of vision of the measuring lens. Total 54% patients had a depth of invasion >1.5 mm, while 46 (46%) patients had <1.5 mm.

In the present study, authors used desmin to confirm muscle invasion by UC. Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Carcinoma (NMIBC) and Muscle-invasive Bladder Carcinoma (MIBC) were classified based on desmin IHC. Council L and Hameed O; Kamela NN et al., Saha K et al., showed the diagnostic utility of Desmin in diagnosing muscle involvement in tumours (20),(21),(22).

In present study, out of 100 cases of bladder carcinoma, 53% were of T1 (low) stage, while the remaining 47% were of the higher stage (T2). Among these patients, 38 patients had a carcinoma in situ component. Nedjadi T et al., studied 76% of tumours belonging to tumour stage T1/T2 and 24% belonging to T3/T4 (8). Thakur B et al., found 52.7% of their urothelial bladder carcinomas were of pT1 stage and 26.36% of cases were of pT2 stage (14). Agarwal H et al., found 32.4% of their tumours belonged to T1 stage and 47.2% belonged to T2 stage (4). Agarwal M et al., observed that the pT2 stage (46.51%) was the most frequently seen stage, with the pT1 stage seen in 44.9% of cases (15). Ibrahim BB et al., observed 63.3% high (T3/T4) stage tumours and 36.6% low (T1/T2) stage tumours as they studied all radical cystectomy specimens (16). The study followed the findings of Nedjadi T et al., and Thakur B et al., but was discordant with the findings of Agarwal H et al., Agarwal M et al., and Ibrahim BB et al., (4),(8),(14),(15),(16).

In the study, 16 cases had LVI, while the majority (84%) had no LVI. All LVI was present in high-grade tumours. 5% of patients had both LVI and PNI. The present study had similar findings as Agarwal H et al., Nedjadi T et al., Kumar M et al., (4),(8),(13). In present study, the majority (94%) showed no PNI, while a minor 6% showed PNI. All PNI were also observed in high-grade tumours only. 5% of patients had both LVI and PNI. Kumar M et al., reported PNI in urothelial tumours and its absence in 70% of urothelial tumours (13). Agarwal H et al., observed the presence of PNI in 8% of cases and its absence in the majority (91.89%) of cases (4). Ibrahim BB et al., observed PNI in 36.7% of cases, with the majority (63.3%) showing no PNI (16).

In the study, 74% of cases showed positive Her2Neu expression, while 26% of cases showed negative Her2Neu expression. Additionally, 17% showed a 0 score (negative), 9% showed a 1+ score (negative), 55% showed a 2+ score (positive), and 19% showed a 3+ score (positive). The percentage of Her2Neu positivity in various studies done earlier ranged from 36% to 70% (12),(13),(15),(16),(17),(19),(23),(24),(25). In present study, authors did not find any statistical relationship between Her2 Neu score and tumour grade (p=0.5764) or tumour stage. The present findings were similar to those of Li Y et al., Jawad NA et al., Kumar M et al., Agarwal M et al., Asmi ATS and Madathiveetil S, Stephan A et al., Kumar S et al., Hegazy R et al., El Moneim HMA et al., Abd El-Fattah GA et al., and El Gehani K et al., (9),(12),(13),(15),(17),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28). Asmi ATS and Madathiveetil S found a significant correlation between Her2Neu status and tumour grade (p-value 0.027) (17), but Stepan A et al., found no statistical relationship between Her2Neu immunoexpression and tumour stage (p-value 0.07) (23).

The study compared the E-cadherin value of high-grade and low-grade UC patients by the application of an unpaired t-test with a two-tailed p-value of <0.001, which was statistically significant. Similarly, by comparing the E-cadherin values in patients with T1 and T2 stages of UC, the p-value was <0.001, which was statistically significant. Popov Z et al., (p-value <0.0001 for tumour stage and <0.001 for tumour grade), El Nemr Esmail RS et al., (p-value <0.001 for stage), Griffiths TRL et al., Hasan AA et al., (p-value <0.001 for stage), Favaretto RL et al., (p-value <0.001 for both tumour grade and stage), Shariat SF et al., showed a positive correlation between loss of E-cadherin expression and the severity of bladder carcinoma in their studies (6),(29),(30),(31),(32),(33).

In the present study, a statistically significant relationship was found between increasing GATA3 score and increasing grade and stage of the tumour. The study results corroborated the findings of previous studies by Agarwal H et al., Leivo MZ et al., (p-value=0.03 for tumour stage), Liu H et al., Frederick ED et al., and Naik M et al., (p-value 0.002535 for stage) (4),(34),(35),(36),(37).

For p63 analysis in present study, a statistically significant relationship was noted between high- and low-grade tumour stages (p=0.0092) and p63 values. The study results were similar to the available literature (5),(38),(39),(40),(41),(42),(43),(44).

Limitation(s)

The duration of the study was not adequate for proper follow-up, and survival analysis could not be conducted.

Conclusion

The GATA3, p63, and E-cadherin can be used as prognostic markers in UCs, as there was a statistically significant relationship between the loss of E-cadherin and p63, along with an increase in GATA3 expression with increasing tumour grade and severity. No significant relationship was found between Her2Neu expression and tumour grade or tumour stage.

References

1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. WHO Classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016. Pp. 78-107.
3.
Netto GJ. Molecular biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: Are we there yet? Nat Rev Urol. 2011;9(1):41-51. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Agarwal H, Babu S, Rana C, Kumar M, Singhai A, Shankhwar SN, et al. Diagnostic utility of GATA3 immunohistochemical expression in urothelial carcinoma. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;62(2):244-50. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Steurer S, Riemann C, Büscheck F, Luebke AM, Kluth M, Hube-Magg C, et al. p63 expression in human tumours and normal tissues: A tissue microarray study on 10,200 tumours. Biomark Res. 2021;9(1):7. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Favaretto RL, Bahadori A, Mathieu R, Haitel A, Grubmüller B, Margulis V, et al. Prognostic role of decreased E-cadherin expression in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-institutional study. World J Urol. 2017;35(1):113-20. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Compérat EM, Burger M, Gontero P, Mostafid AH, Palou J, Rouprêt M, et al. Grading of urothelial carcinoma and the new “World Health Organisation Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs 2016”. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(3):457-66. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Nedjadi T, Al-Maghrabi J, Assidi M, Dallol A, Al-Kattabi H, Chaudhary A, et al. Prognostic value of HER2 status in bladder transitional cell carcinoma revealed by both IHC and BDISH techniques. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:653. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Li Y, Ishiguro H, Kawahara T, Kashiwagi E, Izumi K, Miyamoto H. Loss of GATA3 in bladder cancer promotes cell migration and invasion. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014;15(4):428-35. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Balci MG, Tayfur M. Loss of E-cadherin expression in recurrent non-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(8):4163-68.
11.
Choi W, Shah JB, Tran M, Svatek R, Marquis L, Lee IL, et al. p63 expression defines a lethal subset of muscle-invasive bladder cancers. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30206. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Jawad NA, Ali HH, Kamal MS. Her2/Neu and Ki-67 immunohistochemical expression in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder (A Clinicopathological study). IOSR-J DMS. [Internet]. 2016;15:6.
13.
Kumar M, Konyak P, Babu S, Singhai A, Sinha RJ, Sankhwar SN, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of markers ki67 and her2 neu and its correlation with clinicopathological parameters in urothelial tumours. Int J of Curr Res. 2016;8(12):43704-08.
14.
Thakur B, Kishore S, Dutta K, Kaushik S, Bhardwaj A. Role of p53 and Ki-67 immunomarkers in carcinoma of urinary bladder. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2017;60(4):505-09. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Agarwal M, Jaiswal M, Pandey S, Fareed R. Her2neu expression in urinary bladder cancer: Histopathological, clinic-radiological and epidemiological aspects. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2019;6(3):489-96. [crossref]
16.
Ibrahim BB, Mahmoud SA, Mohamed AA, Hanbuli HME. Expression of HER2/neu and Ki-67 in urothelial carcinoma and their relation to clinicopathological data: An Egyptian study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2021;15(3):EC06-EC09. [crossref]
17.
Asmi ATS, Madathiveetil S. HER2/neu overexpression in urothelial carcinoma and its association with tumour grading- A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Kerala. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2021;8(09):497-501. [crossref]
18.
Wang L, Feng C, Ding G, Ding Q, Zhou Z, Jiang H, et al. Ki67 and TP53 expressions predict recurrence of non- muscle- invasive bladder cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(4):2989-95. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Davis R, Jones JS, Barocas DA, Castle EP, Lang EK, Leveilee RJ, et al; American Urological Association. Diagnosis, evaluation and follow up of asymptomatic microhaematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2012;188(6):2473-81. PMID:23098784. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Council L, Hameed O. Differential expression of immunohistochemical markers in bladder smooth muscle and myofibroblasts, and the potential utility of desmin, smoothelin, and vimentin in staging of bladder carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(5):639-50. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Kamel NN, Helmy NA, Hassanein AA, Sharaf WM, Moneer BI, Salem MM. The diagnostic utility of antibodies to smoothelin and desmin in staging of urothelial carcinoma. Egyptian Journal of Pathology. 2015;35(1):14-23. [crossref]
22.
Saha K, Saha A, Datta C, Chatterjee U, Ray S, Bera M. Does desmin immunohistochemistry have a role in assessing stage of urothelial carcinoma in transurethral resection of bladder tumour specimens? Clin Cancer Investig J 2014;3(6):502-07. [crossref]
23.
Stepan A, Simionescu C, Margaritescu C, Ciurea R. P16, c-erbB2 and Ki67 immunoexpression in urothelial carcinomas of the bladder. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011;52(2):653-58.
24.
Kumar S, Prajapati O, Vaiphei K, Parmar KM, Sriharsha AS, Singh SK. Human Epidermal Growth factor receptor 2/neu overexpression in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and its prognostic significance: is it worth hype? South Asian J Cancer. 2015;4(3):115-17. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Hegazy R, Kamel M, Salem EA, Salem NA, Fawzy A, Sakr A, et al. The prognostic significance of p53, p63 and her2 expression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in relation to treatment with bacille Calmette-Guerin. Arab J Urol. 2015;13(3):225-30. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
El Moneim HMA, Tawfik HM, El Sherbiny YM, Tawfiek ER. Analysis of Her2/neu overexpression and amplification in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder associated with Cox-2 overexpression. Int J Cancer Res. 2011;7(1):08-24. [crossref]
27.
Abd El-Fattah GA, El-Sawi RM, Abd-Rabuh RM. Prognostic value of CD44 and HER2/Neu in invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Med J Cairo Univ. 2014;82(2):81-87.
28.
El Gehani K, Al-Kikhia L, Emaetig F, Syrjänen K, Al-Fituri O, Elzagheid A. Over-expression of HER-2 is associated with the stage in carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Libyan J Med. 2012;7:3402. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Popov Z, Gil-Diez de Medina S, Lefrere-Belda MA, Hoznek A, Bastuji-Garin S, Abbou CC, et al. Low E-cadherin expression in bladder cancer at the transcriptional and protein level provides prognostic information. Br J Cancer. 2000;83(2):209-14. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Esmail RSEN, Abdellah MM, Abdel-Salam LO. Correlation of Muscle Invasion in Bladder Cancer with Cell Adhesion Properties and Oncoprotein Overexpression Using E-Cadherin and HER2/neu Immunohistochemical Markers. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020;8(A):43-48. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.3388. [crossref]
31.
Griffiths TR, Brotherick I, Bishop RI, White MD, McKenna DM, Horne CH, et al. Cell adhesion molecules in bladder cancer: soluble serum E-cadherin correlates with predictors of recurrence. Br J Cancer. 1996;74(4):579-84. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Hassan AA. E-cadherin experesion in non invasive and invasive urothelial carcinoma. Al-azhar Assiut Medical Journal. 2015;13(3):1.
33.
Shariat SF, Pahlavan S, Baseman AG, Brown RM, Green AE, Wheeler TM, et al. Lerner SP. E-cadherin expression predicts clinical outcome in carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Urology. 2001;57(1):60-65. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Leivo MZ, Elson PJ, Tacha DE, Delahunt B, Hansel DE. A combination of p40, GATA-3 and uroplakin II shows utility in the diagnosis and prognosis of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Pathology. 2016;48(6):543-49. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Liu H, Shi J, Wilkerson ML, Lin F. Immunohistochemical evaluation of GATA3 expression in tumours and normal tissues: A useful immunomarker for breast and urothelial carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;138(1):57-64. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Doamekpor FE, Mohamed AMR, Siddiqui M, Ayman A, Wang T, Ashraf K, et al. GATA3 immunohistochemical expression in urothelial carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(15):e16135. Doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.e16135. [crossref]
37.
Naik M, Rao BV, Fonseca D, Murthy SS, Giridhar A, Sharma R, et al. GATA-3 Expression in all grades and different variants of primary and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021;12(Suppl 1):72-78. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Compérat E, Bièche I, Dargère D, Ferlicot S, Laurendeau I, Benoît G, et al. p63 gene expression study and early bladder carcinogenesis. Urology. 2007;70(3):459-62. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Koga F, Kawakami S, Fujii Y, Saito K, Ohtsuka Y, Iwai A, et al. Impaired p63 expression associates with poor prognosis and uroplakin III expression in invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(15):5501-07.
40.
Abdelwahab MM, Elbasateeny SS. Significance of Her2/Neu, C-kit and p63 immunohistochemical expression in bladder urothelial carcinoma. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 2015;6(2):28-38.
41.
Kaur R, Manjari M, Piplani S. Clinicopathological correlation of p63 in Urothelial Carcinoma: Immunohistochemical Study. Annals of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2020;7(6):A269-74. Doi: 10.21276/APALM.2738. [crossref]
42.
Langner C, Ratschek M, Tsybrovskyy O, Schips L, Zigeuner R. p63 immunoreactivity distinguishes upper urinary tract transitional-cell carcinoma and renal-cell carcinoma even in poorly differentiated tumours. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003;51(8):1097-99.[crossref][PubMed]
43.
Raheem SA, Saied AN, Shaer RA, Mustafa O, Ali AH. The role of CK20, p53 and p63 in differentiation of some urothelial lesions of urinary bladder, immunohistochemical study. Open Journal of Pathology. 2014;4(4):181-93. [crossref]
44.
Nageeb OM, Elnashar AT, Abd El Wahab AG. Immunohistochemical expression of p63 in urothelial carcinoma. Sohag Medical Journal. 2017;21(1):237-246.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66758.19329

Date of Submission: Jul 27, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 16, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 16, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 29, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 15, 2024 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com