Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 207651

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : TD01 - TD05 Full Version

Multiple Cranial Nerve Involvement in a Complex Case of MISME Syndrome in a Paediatric Patient: A Case Report


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69601.19254
Afwaan Faizal, Michael Antony Vikram, Ajay Lucas Rubben Prabhu, Dinesh Babu Jawahar, Sam Raja

1. Junior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ajay Lucas Rubben Prabhu,
19, Abi Ajay Building, Rangarajulu Street, Aminjikarai-600029, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: mslucas007@gmail.com

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) is characterised by numerous tumours in the central and peripheral nervous systems due to NF2 gene abnormalities that cause the tumour suppressor protein, Merlin, to disappear. Often referred to as Multiple Inherited Schwannomas, Meningiomas, and Ependymomas (MISME), a distinctive characteristic of NF2 is bilateral vestibular schwannomas manifesting in late adolescence with symptoms such as sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, and balance issues. Two distinct phenotypes, Wishart and Feiling-Gardner, characterise NF2. This case report discusses the case of a paediatric patient who presented with bilateral hearing loss, giddiness, and blurring of vision and sought a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination which revealed bilateral vestibular schwannomas, non vestibular schwannomas, left sphenoid wing meningiomas, multidirectional spinal schwannomas, spinal nerve sheath tumours, and lesions in the retroperitoneal region. Despite an absent family history, significant involvement of cranial nerves strongly indicates classical NF2. Management focuses on preserving function, and surgery is contemplated for symptomatic lesions and tumours causing cord compression. Gamma Knife radiosurgery and targeted therapies have been investigated.

Keywords

Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Multiple inherited schwannomas, Meningiomas, and ependymomas, Vestibular schwannoma

Case Report

A 15-year-old paediatric male patient presented with bilateral hearing loss and giddiness for four months and blurring of vision in the right eye. The patient had a history of drooping of the left eyelid since childhood. There was no known family history, particularly regarding meningiomas and NF2. Physical examination yielded normal results with no presence of neurocutaneous markers and demonstrated a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15/15. Audiogram findings revealed sensorineural hearing loss. The patient underwent a comprehensive MRI examination of the brain with the whole spine (plain and contrast study) using a 1.5 Tesla Philips MRI machine.

The imaging of the brain revealed infratentorial heterogeneous bilateral cerebellopontine angle lesions (Table/Fig 1) with intense postcontrast enhancement and multiple non enhancing necrotic areas within, suggestive of vestibular schwannomas (Table/Fig 2). There was ipsilateral intracanalicular extension and widening of the porus acousticus. Multifocal areas of Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI) hypointensities suggestive of micro-haemorrhages were observed (Table/Fig 3). MR spectroscopy showed a choline peak (Table/Fig 4). The lesion was observed compressing the fourth ventricle, causing mild supratentorial hydrocephalus.

Two supratentorial dural-based lesions suggestive of meningiomas (Table/Fig 5) were observed, each along the posterior and medial aspect of the greater and lesser wings of the left sphenoid bone, and another along the posterior and lateral aspect of the greater wing of the left sphenoid bone, showing intense enhancement, thickening, and enhancement of the adjacent dura, giving a positive dural tail sign (Table/Fig 6). The terminal segment of the left internal carotid artery, along with its branches, was observed traversing through the lesion. Multifocal areas of SWI hypointensities, which on CT were confirmed to be calcifications, were observed (Table/Fig 7). The lesion also caused hyperostosis of the adjacent bony framework. There was a marked deviation of the left eye towards the left lateral aspect caused by ipsilateral medial rectus palsy due to the mass effect of the aforementioned sphenoid meningioma (Table/Fig 8).

Tiny, fairly defined, lobulated, heterogeneous lesions involving the cisternal segment of the right oculomotor nerve and bilateral trigeminal nerves, showing intense enhancement postcontrast, implying non vestibular schwannomas, were also observed (Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10). Severe tortuosity of the bilateral optic nerves, suggestive of intracranial hypertension, was noted.

Imaging of the spine revealed an intensely enhancing intramedullary lesion in the cervicomedullary junction at the level of the C1 vertebra, suggestive of ependymoma, causing perilesional oedema and mild expansion of the spinal cord (Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12). Another well-defined, intensely enhancing, intradural extramedullary lesion was observed within the anterior and left lateral aspect of the spinal canal (Table/Fig 13), extending through multiple neural foramina as a multilobulated, multidirectional “dumbbell” shaped mass into the extraspinal space, representing a spinal schwannoma (Table/Fig 14). On CT, the lesions were causing negative bone remodeling in the form of erosions (Table/Fig 15). Mass effect of the lesions was noted in the form of compression of the bilateral D11-L2 traversing nerve roots and encasement of the left D12-L1 exiting nerve roots, extending into the left psoas major and abutting the inter and lower pole medial cortices of the left kidney (Table/Fig 16).

Multiple fairly defined, similar but smaller enhancing lesions, likely spinal nerve sheath tumours, were also observed along the proximal aspect of the right D11-L2 spinal nerves (Table/Fig 17), and a few homogeneously enhancing, lobulated lesions were seen involving the retroperitoneal region (para-aortic region) (Table/Fig 18).

The clinical diagnosis in this case was NF2, evident from the presentation of multiple tumours involving the central and peripheral nervous systems. The patient’s symptoms of bilateral hearing loss, giddiness, blurring of vision, and left eyelid drooping further support the diagnosis of NF2. Differential diagnosis considered include other conditions presenting with similar symptoms or imaging findings, such as NF1, schwannomatosis, and multiple meningiomas syndrome. However, the comprehensive clinical presentation, along with imaging findings consistent with NF2, strongly supports the diagnosis of this condition in this paediatric patient.

The patient was directed to an advanced medical facility for additional care, and subsequent attempts to contact the patient were unsuccessful.

Discussion

NF2 is a rare autosomal dominant condition distinguished by the formation of multiple tumours in both the central and peripheral nervous systems (1). It is considered a misnomer due to the lack of presentation of neurofibromas in this disorder. NF2 is closely associated with mutations in the NF2 gene on chromosome 22q12, which lead to the disappearance of the tumour suppressor protein known as Merlin (2). Merlin plays a critical role in maintaining the structural integrity of cells by connecting the cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane (3).

The spectrum of tumours associated with NF2 includes schwannomas, meningiomas, and ependymomas, making NF2 alternatively referred to as MISME. NF2 is commonly diagnosed during the second and third decades of life (4). Individuals who have a family history of NF2 need to be screened as early as age 10 or 12. The Manchester Criteria have been widely regarded for the diagnosis of NF2, encompassing several key indicators. These include the presence of bilateral vestibular schwannomas, other tumours associated with NF2 such as meningiomas and schwannomas outside the vestibular nerves, onset of tumours before a certain age, and consideration of molecular testing for NF2 mutations (5),(6),(7).

The Feiling-Gardner and Wishart phenotypes are two different NF2 presentations. When numerous tumours occur in the brain and spine of patients under 20 years, it is indicative of a more aggressive Wishart phenotype. Patients older than 20 years old who have the Feiling phenotype experience less aggressive tumour growth (8).

NF2 usually presents itself during late adolescence/early adulthood and is mainly attributed to schwannomas, with symptoms presenting in the form of sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, and lack of balance. Schwannomas are benign tumours that originate from peripheral nerve sheaths and are the most common type of spinal tumour in NF2 (9). A characteristic hallmark of NF2 is the occurrence of bilateral vestibular schwannomas, and it’s worth noting that approximately 10% of individuals diagnosed with this type of tumour also have NF2 (10). Jugular foramen schwannomas and hypoglossal schwannomas are the next most common cranial nerve schwannomas, with trigeminal schwannoma coming in second behind vestibular nerve tumours (11). Pure motor nerves are less commonly affected by schwannomas than sensory or mixed sensory and motor nerves. Schwannomas most commonly occur in the cervicothoracic area, where they begin at the dorsal root. Numerous small schwannomas, often called tumourlets, are commonly seen throughout the cauda equina in many patients (12).

Meningiomas represent the second most common tumours in NF2, identified in over 50% of NF2 patients, with adult NF2 patients typically having an average of three meningiomas, predominantly occurring in the supratentorial region along the falx cerebri; however, they can also occur anywhere throughout the central nervous system. In the spinal cord, meningiomas are primarily observed in the thoracic region (13).

Ependymomas are low-grade tumours that are typically located in the cervical part of the spinal cord or the intramedullary region of the conus medullaris. Roughly, 90% of NF2 patients have ocular abnormalities, with posterior subcapsular lenticular cataracts being the most frequent ocular symptom (14).

Very few cases of MISME syndrome have been chronicled. One such case report described a unique case of MISME syndrome in a patient with NF2, showcasing multiple tumours involving different regions of the nervous system. The report underscored the challenges of managing extensive tumour burden in NF2 patients and highlighted the significance of early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management in improving patient outcomes (15).

A study focusing on the outcomes of Gamma Knife Stereotactic radiosurgery (GKS) in treating NF2-associated meningiomas highlighted favourable tumour control rates and minimal adverse effects of GKS, suggesting it as an effective treatment option for NF2-associated meningiomas (16).

Another case report discussed a rare constellation of findings in a patient with NF2, presenting with extensive cranial nerve involvement leading to various neurological symptoms. This case emphasised the importance of comprehensive neurological evaluation and individualised treatment planning in managing NF2 patients with cranial nerve tumours (12). In this case report, all the features of this syndrome extensively involving the brain and spinal cord can be seen in the same patient.

Conclusion

This case highlights the comprehensive manifestation of NF2 in a paediatric patient, characterised by bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, cranial nerve involvement, and multiple tumours throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. Even if there isn’t any pertinent family history, the case’s several observations-particularly the widespread involvement of the cranial nerves-strongly imply a classical presentation of NF2. Neurological examination and central nervous system imaging are the main diagnostic tools. Because individuals with NF2 have a lifetime tendency to grow new tumours or experience the recurrence of existing ones, it is vital to stress that the condition is incurable and that the primary goal of care is to preserve function. Symptomatic lesions are usually removed as part of treatment plans, and further lesions are routinely checked for. When there are indicators of spinal cord compression, surgical intervention for spinal tumours is typically explored. The key inference drawn from this case underscores the importance of recognising NF2’s varied clinical presentation, emphasising the need for early diagnosis and intervention to preserve function and improve patient outcomes.

References

1.
Dewan R, Pemov A, Dutra AS, Pak ED, Edwards NA, Ray-Chaudhury A, et al. First insight into the somatic mutation burden of neurofibromatosis type 2-associated grade I and grade II meningiomas: A case report comprehensive genomic study of two cranial meningiomas with vastly different clinical presentation. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):127. Doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3127-6. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sekhar DS, Syamkumar IB, Srinivas BH, Vandanapu S, Vimala A. Triple tumours in MISME syndrome-A rare case report and review of literature. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(8):75-78. Doi: 10.9790/0853-14847578.
3.
Lopez EW, Vue Z, Broaddus RR, Behringer RR, Gladden AB. The ERM family member Merlin is required for endometrial gland morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2018;442(2):301-14. Doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.08.006. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Raturi VP, Singh R. Multiple inherited schwannomas, meningiomas, and ependymomas syndrome in an adult patient. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2020;41(02):266-68. Doi: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_141_18. [crossref]
5.
Aboukais R, Baroncini M, Zairi F, Bonne NX, Schapira S, Vincent C, et al. Prognostic value and management of spinal tumours in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013;155(5):771-77. Doi: 10.1007/s00701- 012-1590-z. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Wang MX, Dillman JR, Guccione J, Habiba A, Maher M, Kamel S, et al. Neurofibromatosis from head to toe: What the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2022;42(4):1123-44. Doi: 10.1148/rg.210235. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Upadhyaya V, Upadhyaya DN. An interesting case of MISME syndrome. J Peripher Nerve Surg. 2020;3:41-43. Doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1703998.
8.
Farschtschi S, Mautner VF, McLean ACL, Schulz A, Friedrich RE, Rosahl SK. The Neurofibromatoses. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(20):354-60. Doi: 10.3238/ arztebl.2020.0354.
9.
Muramatsu K, Tani Y, Seto T, Iwanaga R, Mihara A, Ihara K, et al. Schwannoma in the extremity: Clinical features and microscopic intra-capsular enucleation. J Rural Med. 2021;16(4):184-90. Doi: 10.2185/jrm.2021-020. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Sharma AK. MISME syndrome: A very rare constellation of multiple supratentorial, infratentorial and multiple spinal tumours in neurofibromatosis type 2. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery. 2020;19(1):100579. Doi: 10.1016/j. inat.2019.100579. [crossref]
11.
Moualed D, Wong J, Thomas O, Heal C, Saqib R, Choi C, et al. Prevalence and natural history of schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2): The influence of pathogenic variants. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30(4):458-64. Doi: 10.1038/ s41431-021-01029-y. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Hiremath R, Dakshin V, Agrawal S. Neurofibromatosis 2: Rare constellation of findings with extensive cranial nerve involvement. Radiol Case Rep. 2021;16(1):157-65. Doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.10.050. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Teranishi Y, Miyawaki S, Nakatochi M, Okano A, Ohara K, Hongo H, et al. Meningiomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 predominantly comprise ‘immunogenic subtype’ tumours characterised by macrophage infiltration. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023;11:156. Doi: 10.1186/s40478-023-01645-3. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Rudà R, Bruno F, Pellerino A, Soffietti R. Ependymoma: Evaluation and management updates. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022;24(8):985-93. Doi: 10.1007/ s11912-022-01260-w. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Faried A, Naibaho G, Dahlan RH, Sidabutar R, Ompusunggu SE, Arifin MZ. Multiple Inherited Schwannomas, Meningiomas, and Ependymomas (MISME): A case report on rare case of neurofibromatosis type 2 tumours. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2017;10:40-43. Doi: 10.1016/j.inat.2017.06.002. [crossref]
16.
Mohammed N, Hung YC, Xu Z, Chytka T, Liščák R, Tripathi M, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 2-Associated meningiomas: An international multicenter study of outcomes after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2022;136(1):109-14. Doi: 10.3171/2020.12.JNS202814.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69601.19254

Date of Submission: Jan 15, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Feb 17, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Feb 23, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 15, 2024
• Manual Googling: Feb 19, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Feb 21, 2024 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com