Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 78095

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : KD04 - KD06 Full Version

Immediate Effect of Dry Cupping along side Breathing Exercises on Chest Wall Mobility in a Patient with COPD: A Case Report


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67506.19145
Yukti Jobanputtra, Vaishnavi Yadav

1. Student, Department of Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Yukti Jobanputtra,
Student, Department of Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, DMIMS, Wardha-442004, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: jobanputtrayukti@gmail.com

Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is one of the most prevalent respiratory disorders, caused by the obstruction of the respiratory pathway. It is a progressive disease that worsens with time, but it is treatable. Physiotherapists are widely acknowledged to have a significant role in the care of patients suffering from respiratory disease. They employ a number of tactics targeted at reducing the labour of breathing, enhancing ventilation, promoting function, and providing dyspnoea alleviation. Chest physical therapy may include postural corrections to promote ventilation, secretory retention control, breathing and whole-body exercises to increase strength and function, and the use of adjuncts to improve lung function. Cupping therapy is one of the ancient healing methods. It is used on the skin by creating a negative pressure inside the cup through various devices. Many studies have shown that cupping therapy has promising preventive and therapeutic effects in a variety of pathological conditions, such as high fever due to upper respiratory tract infection, pulmonary dysfunctions in asthmatic children, type 2 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrhythmias, and chronic fatigue syndrome. Here, the authors reported a case of a 74-year-old male patient demonstrating the positive effect of cupping therapy, particularly dry dynamic cupping, along with physical exercise to improve chest expansion or thoracic expansion and improve well-being in a patient suffering from COPD.

Keywords

Chest expansion, Chronic obstruction, Dyspnoea, Physical therapy, Quality of life, Thoracic pain

Case Report

A 74-year-old male farmer, by occupation, visited the respiratory Outpatient Department (OPD) with chief complaints of difficulty in breathing (more during the night or activity), pain, and cough with sputum (yellow expectoration) for the past 18 days, and intermittent fever for six days. The patient was previously treated in a private hospital six years ago for severe breathlessness episodes while working and has been experiencing dyspnoea since then. The patient had a history of a stroke eight months back with left hemiparalysis, which completely recovered. He had a history of addictions to cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and tobacco chewing (kharra) for the past 37 years, and dust allergy with seasonal variation, which was exacerbated during the winter. He had no history of diabetes, hypertension, weight loss, loss of appetite, biomass exposure, or any kind of drug allergy. The patient was observed in sitting position, and was supportive, properly well-versed with time, location, and person. A slightly barrel-shaped chest was observed from the lateral side during the examination, and the accessory muscles were used during breathing. The trachea was not deviated on palpation, and chest excursion and tactile vocal fremitus were decreased on both sides in all the zones. At the axillary, nipple, and xiphisternal levels, the chest expansion was noticed to be reduced by 1 cm, 1.5 cm, and 1cm, respectively (Table/Fig 1). A hyper-resonant sound was present on percussion. Breath sounds were reduced bilaterally along with rhonchi during auscultation in the upper and lower zones.

Various investigations were performed, including Electrocardiogram (ECG), blood investigations, and sputum collection, all of which were within normal limits. An X-ray investigation revealed bronchopulmonary findings and flattening of the diaphragm, along with hyperinflated lungs (Table/Fig 2). The patient’s Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) thorax with CT pulmonary angiogram revealed diffuse centrilobular and paraseptal emphysematous changes noted in bilateral lung fields. Also, a few patchy ground opacities were noted in the superior lingular segment in the left upper lobe. The Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis findings revealed respiratory acidosis, with pH, pCO2, and HCO3 as 7.34, 50 mmHg, 26 mEq/Litre.

Based on the findings of clinical, laboratory, and radiological investigations, the patient was diagnosed with COPD. The patient was prescribed paracetamol, azithromycin, and bronchodilators to provide symptomatic relief, and after four days, was referred to the department of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy for the management of excessive secretions, improvement of chest expansion, and exercise capacity.

The physiotherapeutic exercise protocol was goal-oriented and was followed with cupping techniques. Dynamic cupping therapy was used to stimulate relaxation in the intercostal muscles, and silicon cups were used for treatment. Firstly, the patient was assessed for chest expansion using tape in the sitting position. And then in the supine position, arnica oil was applied completely over the thoracic/chest region to reduce friction with the skin (Table/Fig 1). Then, intercostal spaces were palpated by considering the space below the clavicle as the second intercostal, and then progressively working on each intercostal muscle of the thorax. The silicon cup was pressed and placed on the muscles, generating a vacuum effect and creating negative pressure under the cup, and then synchronising the movement of cupping with the rhythm of breathing. On inhalation, when the thorax rises, the cup was kept on standby, and when the patient exhales, the cup glides very slowly from the central to the peripheral direction. With every single exhalation of the breath, the silicon cup was given a dynamic motion. This process was repeated five times in each intercostal space for three days (Table/Fig 3). This improves circulation in the muscles and also focuses on the extensibility of muscles, along with promoting the mobility of the chest muscles.

After the cupping intervention, a re-evaluation of chest expansion was done after three days, and a positive result was noted (Table/Fig 4), following which he was asked to perform deep breathing exercises, thoracic expansion exercises, and pursed lip breathing exercises to maintain good ventilation.

The outcome measures used to assess the patient’s progress in the pre-intervention and post-intervention phase are shown in the table below (Table/Fig 5). The patient was given cupping therapy along with the breathing exercises in the hospital. He was also advised to exercise breathing retraining and hygiene activity every day and was additionally taught to use relaxation and dyspnoea-relieving techniques when required. The patient was asked to rate his pain on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (1) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain) (worst pain), and the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale (2) was also used as mentioned in (Table/Fig 5). The patient was satisfied with the productive rehabilitation and outcomes of the intervention. Due to a lack of patient adherence, follow-up was not possible.

Discussion

Respiratory diseases have a negative impact on a person’s breathing and ventilation capacity. COPD is a serious condition that causes functional impairments and secondary problems such as pneumothorax, pulmonary hypertension, pneumonia, and chronic atelectasis after emphysema, the most frequent form of COPD (3). The study described a case of a patient suffering from COPD, and upon examination, it was found that the patient’s chest expansion and excursion were reduced. Therefore, to improve the mobility of the muscles of the chest wall, it was important to gain extensibility of the muscles. After the intervention was performed, the patient reported a significant improvement, and the severity of his symptoms decreased. Even the outcome measures used in this study, i.e., NPRS and the modified Borg dyspnoea scale, provided positive feedback on the patient’s condition. A study proposed that thoracic pain and dyspnoea could be linked. This is supported by the fact that primary and secondary breathing muscles are frequently used to manage breathlessness in COPD patients (4). Thus, cupping therapy was used as an intervention for it. Although cupping therapy is an ancient therapy, it has recently gained a lot of popularity as a positive therapeutic intervention.

Aboushanab TS et al., concluded that cupping therapy, when administered, can significantly improve pulmonary functioning in asthmatic children, particularly those with mild asthma (5). Hekmatpou D et al., in their study, evaluated the effect of wet cupping on 110 male smokers with positive results on a pulmonary function test and COPD. They reported that wet cupping (approximately 15-20 minutes), compared with venesection, caused a continued O2 saturation in the intervention group for up to 12 hours (6). Cao H et al., reported that cupping therapy may have an effect on pain conditions, herpes zoster, symptoms of cough and asthma, acne, the common cold, or other common diseases. The current evidence is not sufficient to allow a recommendation for the clinical use of cupping therapy for the treatment of the above diseases of any aetiology in people of any age group. The long-term effect of cupping therapy is not known, but the use of cupping is generally safe based on long-term clinical use and reports from the reviewed clinical studies (7).

Physiotherapy is essential to improve the lungs’ oxygenation and ventilation capacity. Diaphragmatic breathing and segmental expansion, as well as pursed lip breathing, create back pressure on the alveoli, allowing for extended perfusion and the development of collateral routes for ventilation. Physiotherapists must administer breathing exercises to COPD patients during pulmonary rehabilitation to enhance chest wall expansion. There is evidence that maximal inspiratory exercises can promote chest wall expansion by demonstrating mechanical changes and increasing chest wall mobility (8). Dimitrova A et al., studied and created a pulmonary rehabilitation regimen that included markers such as the six-Minute Walk Test and the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) scale to measure the severity of COPD symptoms before and after intervention (9). In his study, Lauche R stated that cupping is used to improve local blood and lymphatic circulation as well as to relieve painful muscle tension (10).

The innovative group singing therapy has also been demonstrated to increase holistic health by addressing a variety of biopsychosocial components. Effective respiratory muscle recruitment and improvements in oxygenation can be obtained by adopting targeted vocal strategies to engage the diaphragmatic muscle. Singing has also been shown to increase the overall quality of life (11). There are few articles in the literature regarding cupping therapy for respiratory disorders; hence, there is scope for future research.

Conclusion

The purpose of the present paper was to establish the management a strategy to increase chest expansion in a COPD patient in terms of pulmonary rehabilitation. Before the treatment, the patient exhibited decreased chest wall expansion, poor mucus clearance, and breathing issues. Thus, an approach with an integrated and thorough rehabilitation regimen has resulted in positive changes in the severity of dyspnoea, cough, chest wall mobility, weakness, and general quality of life.

References

1.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation- measures/numeric-pain-rating-scale. Last accessed on- 27th December 2023.
2.
Wilson RC, Jones PW. A comparison of the visual analogue scale and modified Borg scale for the measurement of dyspnoea during exercise. Clin Sci. 1989;76(3):277-82. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Kiliç Z, Karadag? S, Tutar N. The effect of progressive relaxation exercises on dyspnea and anxiety levels in individuals with COPD: A randomized controlled trial. Holist Nurs Pract. 2023;37(1):E14-23. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Bentsen SB, Rustøen T, Miaskowski C. Prevalence and characteristics of pain in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared to the Norwegian general population. J Pain. 2011;12(5):539-45. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Aboushanab TS, Daif M, Mahmoud R. The role of cupping therapy as a complementary therapy on the pulmonary functions and quality of life of asthmatic children. Egypt Child Postgrad Inst Ain Shams Univ. 2010. Available from: [file:///C:/Users/AA/Downloads/f1000research-154679.pdf].
6.
Hekmatpou D, Moeini L, Haji-Nadali S. The effectiveness of wet cupping vs. venesection on arterial O2 saturation level of cigarette smokers: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(6):1349-53. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Cao H, Han M, Li X, Dong S, Shang Y, Wang Q, et al. Clinical research evidence of cupping therapy in China: A systematic literature review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010;10(1):70. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Permadi AW, Putra IMWA. Comparison of respiratory training methods for chest wall expansion in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Phys Educ Sport. 2018;18(4):2235-39.
9.
Dimitrova A, Izov N, Maznev I, Vasileva D, Nikolova M. Physiotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017;5(6):720. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Lauche R, Cramer H, Choi KE, Rampp T, Saha FJ, Dobos GJ, et al. The influence of a series of five dry cupping treatments on pain and mechanical thresholds in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain- A randomised controlled pilot study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11(63):01-11. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Full article: “SingStrong”: Singing for better lung health in COPD- A pilot study. 2023. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593985. 2021.1907825.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67506.19145

Date of Submission: Sep 20, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 01, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 29, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 21, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 08, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 27, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com