JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Neonatology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29754.10711
Year : 2017 | Month : Oct | Volume : 11 | Issue : 10 Full Version Page : SC01 - SC05

Study on Serum Lipoprotein Profile of Exclusive Breast Fed, Mixed Fed and Formula Fed Preterm Infants

Vineet Jaiswal1, Anita Mehta2, Komal Prasad Kushwaha3

1 Lecturer, Department of Paediatrics, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3 Professor, Department of Paediatrics, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Anita Mehta, 29 H (Behind Kali Mandir) Daudpur, Gorakhpur-273001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: 25anitamehta@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Breast feeding is protective for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, obesity, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and hypertension. Serum lipoprotein is principal risk factor for atherosclerosis. There is growing evidence that risk of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) begins to emerge from infancy. Lipoprotein level is affected by different feeding pattern during infancy.

Aim

To compare serum lipoprotein profile of exclusively breast fed, mixed fed and formula fed preterm infant.

Materials and Methods

A total of two fifty preterm newborn were recruited at birth and divided into three groups. Group A were Exclusively Breast Fed (EBF), Group B were Mixed Fed (MF) and Group C were Formula/bovine milk Fed (FF) infants. Preterm newborns with severe sepsis, hypoglycemia, Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) stage II and III, meconium stained amniotic fluid, pathological jaundice, Hyaline Membrane Disease (HMD), less than 28 weeks gestation, with major congenital anomaly and infants born to mothers with DM, gestational diabetes, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or on long term medications were excluded from the study. Lipoprotein profile estimation was done at four weeks and again at 16 weeks of age.

Results

At four weeks of age, Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglyceride (TG), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) were higher in EBF infants as compared to MF and FF infants. For TC, difference was significant between EBF vs. MF (p<0.001), EBF vs. FF (p<0.001) and MF vs. FF (p=0.005) infants. At 16 weeks also, TC and HDL were higher in EBF infants as compared to MF and FF infants. For TC, this difference was significant between EBF vs. MF (p<0.001) and EBF vs. FF (p<0.001) infants. When infants were followed up to 16 weeks of age, TC and LDL level fell significantly (p<0.001) in EBF and MF group, a significant (p<0.05) rise for TC was seen in FF group. At 16 weeks of age, there was no significant rise in HDL in EBF infants, but significant fall was seen in MF (p=0.0001) and in FF (p=0.001) infants.

Conclusion

Breastfeeding, even MF is beneficial in preterm infants as compared to FF in terms of lipoprotein profile which is protective for atherosclerosis.

Keywords

Introduction

Breast milk is an optimal feed for infant, both for full term and preterm, as suggested in international and national guidelines [1,2]. Breast milk, not only provides all the nutrients in proper amount to the infant, but it has other beneficial effects to both infant and mother. Long term benefits associated with breast feeding are better cognitive development in childhood and lower risk of obesity, diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [3-8].

Increase in serum concentration of LDL is a principal risk factor for atherosclerosis and thus a major cause of cardiovascular disease [9]. There is growing evidence that risk of CHD begins to emerge from infancy. Animal and epidemiological evidence suggest that exposures acting in early life may play a role in cardiovascular disease risk. In humans also, early nutritional exposures during infantile period modify cardiovascular risk, including blood cholesterol concentrations in later life [10,11]. It has been seen that infants on different feeding regimens, have different lipoprotein profiles [12]. In exclusively breast fed infants the lipid profile is higher than the formula fed infants [12,13].

Concentrations of the cord blood lipoprotein subtypes are influenced by fetal malnutrition and prematurity while after birth it is affected by the type of feed taken by infant [14]. Cord blood lipoprotein profile in preterm infant is higher than full term infant [15,16] and young adults born preterm have higher risk for cardiovascular disease than those born term [17,18].

With this background, an attempt is made to compare the lipoprotein profile in EBF, MF and FF preterm infants, as there is paucity of studies regarding comparison of lipoprotein profile in EBF, MF and FF preterm infants. Majority of studies have compared this in EBF infants with FF infants [19,20].

Materials and Methods

The present prospective cohort study was carried out in the Department of Paediatrics, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur from June 2010 to May 2011. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Well informed written consent in local language was taken from mothers/guardians of each infant, ensuring their full confidentiality.

Sample size was calculated using G Power Version 3.1.9.2 with mean difference between three groups and standard deviation was calculated from a previous study [20]. Mean difference between breast milk and MF was chosen for sample size calculation. Since, its mean difference was lowest i.e., 12.46±6.72 in breast milk feeding and 18.5±9.48 in mixed feeding group, the calculated effect size was 0.73. Calculated sample size with α error of 5% and power of 95%, was 150 (50 in each group). Assuming 10% of drop out and the possibility of change in feeding pattern during study period, the sample size taken was 200.

A total of 3020 preterm newborn screened from Neonatal unit of Department of Paediatrics, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur and outside deliveries were referred on same day. Two hundred fifty preterm infants with known gestation of <37 weeks (determined by date of last menstrual period, corrected by ultrasound, if necessary) and apparently healthy, along with their mothers, were recruited on first day of birth. Subjects were recruited consecutively during operational working period irrespective of sex, race, religion and socioeconomic status. Preterm infants having severe sepsis, hypoglycaemia, HIE stage II and III, meconium stained amniotic fluid, pathological jaundice, HMD, less than 28 weeks gestation or with major congenital anomaly were excluded from the study. Also, infants born to mothers with DM, gestational diabetes, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or on long term medications were excluded from the study. Infants whose feeding patters changed during study period were also excluded. Mothers of every infant taken under the study were first counselled to start exclusive breast feeding, because it is the hospital’s policy to advice for exclusive breast feeding to all infants. Few working mothers and some non working mothers decided to give artificial milk to their infants because they thought that their infants will not grow properly only by breast feeding. After the mothers had taken the decision, infants were divided in three groups:

Group A: Exclusively breast fed from birth onwards.

Group B: Mixed fed infants, given breast feeding and bovine milk/commercial preterm milk.

Group C: Formula fed infants (commercial preterm milk)/bovine milk.

Infant Data

After inclusion in the study, preterm infants were admitted in Neonatal unit of Paediatric Department and their sex, period of gestation, birth weight, birth length and head circumference were recorded. Sick preterm infants were excluded from the study but they were admitted in NICU and appropriate treatment was given. Weight was taken using electronic weighing scale with an accuracy of 10 gm. Length was measured by infantometer to the nearest of 1 mm and head circumference was taken by a fibreglass tape to the nearest of 1 mm. Counselling for feeding was done by staff nurse trained in Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF). Newborn care was given according to “Departmental Management Protocol” of preterm newborn care.

Maternal Data

Maternal data like age, parity, education status and her breast feeding knowledge was recorded on predesigned proforma. Maternal weight, waist circumference and height were recorded and Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated. Mothers of infants of Group A were educated for proper positioning and attachment. Mothers of infants of Group B and Group C were counselled for the hygienically preparation of artificial feed in proper amount.

Follow up

Infants were followed up with their mothers, initially weekly for four weeks and then fortnightly up to 16 weeks of age. At each visit we enquired about their feeding method, amount of artificial feed given and hygiene for preparing feed. Venous blood sample was taken for lipoprotein profile estimation. Minor ailments of infants were treated and mothers were advised for vaccination of their infants.

Lipoprotein Profile Estimation

Around 3-4 ml venous blood was taken from mother at the time of recruitment. Infant’s sample was taken under all aseptic precautions, two hours before the next feed. First sample was taken at the time of birth, second at four weeks and third sample at 16 weeks of age. Serum was separated and stored at -20°C.

Serum was analysed for lipoprotein profile estimation by auto analyser (Thyrocare technologies limited, Mumbai). Analysis was done for:

Cholesterol: CHOD POD Method [21];

High Density Lipoprotein (HDL): Selective Immune Precipitation method;

Triglycerides: Enzymatic Calorimetric Method (GPO);

Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) were calculated by formula-

LDL: TC-(HDL-C+VLDL-C)

VLDL: TG/5

Total Cholesterol/HDL ratio and HDL/LDL ratio was also calculated.

Precision and accuracy of the measured parameters (Cholesterol Estimation) at laboratory are as follows:

Within runLevel 1Level 2
n=40
Mean (mg/dl)235102.8
SD (mg/dl)7.52.9
CV (%)3.22.84

Total n=40 (10 days/2 runs per day/2 replicates per run)

Mean (mg/dl)235102.8
SD (mg/dl)7.23.2
CV (%)2.73.01

Level 1- Person of high cholesterol level was chosen and test was run (n=40) for 40 times, to calculate the mean and SD of cholesterol level.

Level 2- Similarly person of low cholesterol level was chosen to perform the same test.

Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 16 was used for statistical calculation. Unpaired (two-tailed) t-test was applied to differentiate means of various parameters between the two groups. Paired t-test was used to calculate difference in mean value of various parameters at different period of time within two groups. Categorial variables were compared by Chi-square test. One way ANOVA was used to compare three variables. A p-value of <0.05 was taken as significant.

Results

Two fifty infants were enrolled for the study and followed up to the age of 16 weeks. Out of these, 23 infants lost for follow up and 22 infants changed their feeding pattern during the study, therefore analysis was done on 205 infants. At 16 weeks of age there were 80, 80 and 45 infants in groups A, B and C respectively. At 16 weeks in Groups A, B and C, male:female ratio was 1.7:1, 1.9:1 and 2:1 respectively.

Baseline data included infantile characteristics, maternal characteristics and at birth lipoprotein levels in mother and infant [Table/Fig-1,2]. Baseline characteristics were comparable in three groups.

Baseline characteristics of infant.

Infantile CharacteristicsGroup A (EBF) n=80Group B(MF) n=80Group C(FF) n=45p-value
Weight (Kg)1.5642±28.06*1.3321±34.21*1.2921±30.19*p=0.998
Length (cm)44.54±4.63*44.14±3.80*43.12±3.44*p=0.174
HC (cm)32.11±2.19*31.7±3.42*31.30±2.90*p=0.3088
Gestational Age
28-30 weeks203218χ2=4.643 df=3 p>0.05
31-32 weeks303312
33-34 weeks252011
35-36 weeks251509
Lipoprotein Profile
TC149.27±31.67*144.08±44.59*141.35±38.14*p=0.499
HDL45.66±13.06*48.16±19.80*48.36±20.17*p=0.818
TG136.85±49.88*132.0±44.20*145.79±45.00*p=0.658
Total808045

HC-Head Circumference, TC-Total Cholesterol, HDL-High Density Lipoprotein, TG-Triglyceride

*mean±SD, χ2=Chi square test


Baseline characteristics of mother.

Maternal CharacteristicsGroup A (EBF) n=80Group B(MF) n=80Group C(FF) n=45p-value
Weight (Kg)50.34±6.90*51.74±6.26*50.43±6.21*p=0.342
Waist circumference (cm)81.831±3.70*82.081±5.42*82.981±4.22*p=0.388
BMI (Kg/M2)20.46±3.36*21.20±2.29*20.86±1.66*p=0.214
Breast Feeding Knowledge
Adequate534621χ2=1.883 df=2 p>0.05
Inadequate475429
Age
<25 yrs566830χ2=3.11 df=2 p>0.05
>25 yrs443220
Parity
<2514626χ2=0.535 df=2 p>0.05
>2495424
Smoking/Drinking
Yes894χ2=0.773 df=2 p>0.05
No929146
Lipoprotein Profile
TC159.37±29.63*155.99±24.81*148.74±23.16*p=0.100
HDL42.26±11.12*44.72±11.84*43.88±9.44*p=0.366
TG149.65±45.58*159.45±42.33*163.17±33.57*p=0.162
Total808045

>BMI-Body Mass Index, *mean±SD

χ2=Chi square test


At four weeks of age TC, TG, LDL and VLDL were higher in EBF infants as compared to MF and FF infants [Table/Fig-3]. On statistical analysis for TC, the difference was significant between EBF vs. MF (p<0.001), EBF vs. FF (p<0.001) and MF vs. FF (p=0.005) infants. On statistical analysis for LDL, this difference was significant between EBF vs. MF (p=0.040) and EBF vs. FF (p=0.026) infants. For TG and VLDL the difference was statistically significant between EBF and FF (p=0.031) infants. HDL level was lower in EBF infants as compared to other groups. There was no difference in TC/HDL-C and HDL/LDL ratio in three groups.

Lipid profile of the infants at four weeks in Group A, B and C.

Lipoprotein ProfileGroup A (EBF) n=80 mean±SDGroup B (MF) n=80 mean±SDGroup C (FF) n=45 mean±SDp-value (EBF-MF)p-value (EBF-FF)p-value (MF-FF)
TC (mg/dl)167.62±26.29143.38±26.44126.38±26.43p<0.001p<0.0010.0052
HDL (mg/dl)46.90±12.9347.25±11.0048.84±12.610.85390.41820.4634
TG (mg/dl)162.00±57.76144.91±52.14139.53±51.070.05120.03160.5780
LDL (mg/dl)107.70±1.0583.15±5.0168.64±3.590.04030.02640.1016
VLDL (mg/dl)32.40±11.5528.98±10.4227.90±10.210.05100.03130.5088
TC/HDL4.545±406.624.322±360.904.243±360.450.96970.96660.9901
HDL/LDL0.531±1.400.703±2.190.63±0.550.55480.65030.8267

TC-Total Cholesterol, HDL-High Density Lipoprotein, TG-Triglyceride, LDL-Low Density Lipoprotein, VLDL-Very Low Density Lipoprotein.


At 16 weeks of age [Table/Fig-4] TC and HDL were higher in EBF infants as compared to MF and FF infants. On statistical analysis for TC and HDL, this difference was significant between EBF vs. MF (p<0.001) and EBF vs. FF (p<0.001) infants. On statistical analysis for LDL, this difference was significant between EBF vs. FF (p=0.009) and MF vs. FF (p<0.05) infants. For TG and VLDL, the difference was statistically significant between EBF and MF (p<0.05) infants. HDL/LDL ratio was also showing statistically significant difference between EBF vs. MF (p<0.001), EBF vs. FF (p<0.05) and MF vs. FF (p<0.05) infants.

Lipoprotein profile of the infants at 16 weeks in Group A, B and C.

Lipoprotein ProfileGroup A (EBF)n=80 mean±SDGroup B (MF)n=80 mean±SDGroup C (FF)n=45 mean±SDp-value(EBF-MF)p-value(EBF-FF)p-value(MF-FF)
TC (mg/dl)140.29±30.95109.84±24.68138.61±26.40p<0.001p<0.0010.7123
HDL (mg/dl)48.54±10.6039.42±11.5840.34±11.67p<0.001p<0.0010.6730
TG (mg/dl)114.99±75.24133.54±34.85129.73±24.040.04710.20430.5115
LDL (mg/dl)68.76±5.0966.12±18.5772.32±9.910.22190.00900.0399
VLDL (mg/dl)22.99±15.2626.70±6.9925.95±4.820.04930.20850.5197
TC/HDL4.545±406.624.322±360.904.243±360.450.96970.96660.9901
HDL/LDL0.705±2.080.596±0.6230.557±1.177p<0.0010.04100.0383

[Table/Fig-5] shows lipoprotein profile at birth, four weeks and 16 weeks of age. Changes in lipoprotein levels over a period from four to 16 weeks in three groups were analysed. In EBF infants TC, LDL, VLDL and TG levels fell significantly (p<0.001) from four weeks to 16 weeks. In MF group statistically significant (p<0.001) fall was seen for TC and LDL level and in FF group statistically significant (p<0.05) rise was seen for TC level. HDL level increased in EBF infants from four weeks (46.90±12.93 mg/dl) to 16 weeks (48.54±10.60 mg/dl), although this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Instead the HDL level fell from four weeks to 16 weeks in MF (p<0.001) and in FF (p=0.001) groups.

Lipoprotein profile of infant at four and 16 weeks of age in Group A, B and C.

Group A (n=80)At Birthmean±SDFour Weeksmean±SD16 Weeksmean±SDp-value
TC (mg/dl)169.27±31.67167.62±26.29140.29±30.950.0001
LDL mg/dl)96.24±8.6488.32±1.8868.76±5.090.0001
VLDL mg/dl)27.37±9.9732.04±11.5522.99±15.260.0001
HDL (mg/dl)45.66±13.0646.90±12.9348.54±10.600.3816
TG (mg/dl)136.85±49.88162.0±57.76114.99±75.240.0001
HDL/LDL0.47±1.510.531±2.040.705±2.080.9318
Group B (n=80)
TC (mg/dl)144.08±44.59143.38±26.44109.84±24.680.0001
LDL mg/dl)69.52±15.9576.23±5.0266.12±18.570.0001
VLDL mg/dl)26.4±8.8428.98±10.4226.70±6.990.1061
HDL mg/dl)48.16±19.8047.25±11.039.42±11.580.0001
TG (mg/dl)132.0±44.20144.91±52.14133.54±34.850.1069
HDL/LDL0.69±1.240.703±2.190.596±0.6230.6749
Group C (n=45)
TC (mg/dl)141.35±38.14126.38±26.43138.61±26.400.0307
LDL (mg/dl)63.84±8.9776.74±22.8272.32±9.910.2366
VLDL(mg/dl)29.15±9.0027.90±10.2125.95±4.820.2498
HDL (mg/dl)48.36±20.1748.84±12.6140.34±11.670.0013
TG (mg/dl)145.79±45.00139.53±51.07129.73±24.040.2473
HDL/LDL0.75±2.240.636±0.5520.557±1.1770.6845

Discussion

This study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital to compare the lipoprotein profile in EBF, MF and FF preterm infants. We found that at four weeks TC, TG, LDL and VLDL were higher in EBF infants as compared to MF and FF infants. But at 16 weeks TC, TG, LDL and VLDL level decreased and HDL level increased in EBF infants. At the end of 16 weeks TC levels decreased in MF infants but increased in the FF ones. HDL level decreased at 16 weeks of age in both MF and FF infants.

LDL profile of cord blood represents the maturational status of infant, because adrenal gland and liver are the major organs that utilise cholesterol for the development. After birth, LDL profile is affected by type of milk feed taken by infant [22].

In our study, the level of TC and LDL at four weeks of age and only TC at 16 weeks of age, were significantly higher in EBF infants as compared to MF and FF infants. TG and VLDL levels were significantly higher in EBF infants than in FF infants at four weeks and higher than MF infants at 16 weeks.

Other researchers had also shown that both TC and LDL cholesterol concentrations are higher in breast fed infants as compared to formula fed infants [13,23].

High level of TC and LDL is a known risk factor for atherosclerosis, which was found in EBF infants, but it is a well known fact that the breast feeding is protective to atherosclerosis [24]. Explanation for this could be “Nutritional Programming” of infants for cholesterol metabolism [13,25]. The lower blood cholesterol concentrations observed in adult life in exclusively breast fed infants raise the possibility that exposure to breast milk may have long term effects on blood cholesterol concentrations later in life [26]. Early enteral exposure to the high cholesterol content of breast milk in infancy reduces the endogenous synthesis of cholesterol, probably by down regulation of hepatic hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, which is seen even in adult life [19,27]. Hence, higher cholesterol levels in infants in first few months of life may prime them for lower cholesterol production later in life.

A second explanation could be a “Behavioral Programming” of infant; according to this theory early exposure to breast milk contents like immunoglobulins, nucleotides and hormones specially leptin has an effect on dietary behavior in later life [28]. Breast feeding affects acquisition of taste preferences in infancy and therefore, there is possibility that breastfed infants simply have “healthier” dietary patterns in later life [29-31]. Breast feeding exposes infants to volatile flavour compounds from the maternal diet and this may have a significant impact on flavour learning in infancy, which has some experimental evidences [32-34] also.

When infants were followed up to the age of 16 weeks, the TC level decreased and HDL level increased in EBF. In MF group TC was decreased but HDL also decreased. But in FF group both TC increased and HDL level was also decreased. This finding indicates that even MF is beneficial as compared to FF in terms of lipoprotein profile.

At four weeks the HDL level was less in EBF infants as compared to MF and FF infants, but the difference was not statistically significant. But at 16 weeks HDL level was significantly higher (p<0.001) in exclusively breast fed infants as compared to other groups. This demonstrated that a healthy lipoprotein profile which is protective to cardiovascular disease has started from early in life. High HDL level might be because of the increased concentration of lipoprotein lipase, hepatic lipase and lecithin-cholesterol acyl transferase enzymes which is responsible for increased degradation of TG.

It was observed that sickness episodes like diarrhoea, ARI, pneumonia, sepsis were less in EBF preterm infants as compared to MF and FF infants. Hospitalisations were also less in EBF group as compared to MF and FF ones. This may be because of benefits of breast feeding, health education given to all mothers during each follow up visit and other measures like discouraging bottle feeds.

Limitation

The main limitation of our study is its short term follow up. Future longitudinal studies with long term follow up are necessary to determine whether the effect of feeding pattern on LDL level persists into adulthood or changes with age, as observed in TC concentrations in breast fed adults and to know the clinical implications of the these findings. Furthermore, mother’s diets and the subsequent effect on composition in breast milk should also be investigated to assess infant’s serum lipoprotein profile and its long term effect.

Conclusion

We concluded that in early few months of life the exclusive breast feeding is beneficial as compared to mixed and formula feeding in terms of healthy lipoprotein profile. Even mixed feeding is beneficial to formula feeding because in MF group TC was decreased but in FF group both TC was increased and HDL was decreased at 16 weeks of age.

HC-Head Circumference, TC-Total Cholesterol, HDL-High Density Lipoprotein, TG-Triglyceride*mean±SD, χ2=Chi square test>BMI-Body Mass Index, *mean±SDχ2=Chi square testTC-Total Cholesterol, HDL-High Density Lipoprotein, TG-Triglyceride, LDL-Low Density Lipoprotein, VLDL-Very Low Density Lipoprotein.

References

[1]WHO/UNICEF Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding (2003): World Health Organization: Geneva. available from: http://www.who.int  [Google Scholar]

[2] Guideline for enhancing optimal infant and young child feeding practices 2013 1st edNew DelhiMinistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India  [Google Scholar]

[3]Rowan Karen, Breast-feeding brings cognitive benefits Live Science 2013 :1-2.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Eidelman A, Breastfeeding and cognitive development: is there an association? Jornal de Pediatria 2013 89(4):327-29.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Oddy WH, Infant feeding and obesity risk in the child Breastfeeding review 2012 20(2):7  [Google Scholar]

[6]Pettitt D, Forman M, Hanson R, Knowler W, Bennett P, Breastfeeding and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Pima Indians The Lancet 1997 350(9072):166-68.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Pereira P, Alfenas R, Araújo R, Does breastfeeding influence the risk of developing diabetes mellitus in children? A review of current evidence Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português) 2014 90(1):7-15.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Singhal A, Cole T, Lucas A, Early nutrition in preterm infants and later blood pressure: two cohorts after randomized trials The Lancet 2001 357(9254):413-19.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Fall C, Barker D, Osmond C, Winter P, Clark P, Hales C, Relation of infant feeding to adult serum cholesterol concentration and death from ischaemic heart disease BMJ 1992 304(6830):801-05.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Ehara S, Ueda M, Naruko T, Haze K, Itoh A, Otsuka M, Elevated levels of oxidized low density lipoprotein show a positive relationship with the severity of acute coronary syndromes Circulation 2001 103(15):1955-60.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Ravelli AC, Van der Meulen JH, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Bleker OP, Infant feeding and adult glucose tolerance, lipid profile, blood pressure, and obesity Archives of Disease in Childhood 2000 82(3):248-52.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Prentice A, Williams A, The influence of maternal, fetal and child nutrition on the development of chronic disease in later life The Stationery Office 2011   [Google Scholar]

[13]Chhonker D, Faridi MM, Narang M, Sharma SB, Does type of feeding in infancy influence lipid profile in later life? Indian J Pediatr 2015 82(4):345-48.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Owen CG, Whincup PH, Odoki K, Gilg JA, Cook DG, Infant feeding and blood cholesterol: a study in adolescents and a systematic review Pediatrics 2002 110(3):597-608.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Raju TN, Higgins RD, Stark AR, Leveno KJ, Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pediatrics 2006 118(3):1207-14.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Pardo IM, Geloneze B, Tambascia MA, Barros-Filho AA, Atherogenic lipid profile of Brazilian near-term newborns Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 2005 38(5):755-60.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Ghaemi S, Najafi R, Kelishadi R, Cord blood lipoprotein profile in term, preterm, and late preterm newborns J Res Med Sci 2014 19(11):1038-40.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Barker DJ, The intrauterine origins of cardiovascular disease Acta Paediatrica 1993 82(s392):93-99.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Kerkhof GF, Breukhoven PE, Leunissen RW, Willemsen RH, Hokken-Koelega AC, Does preterm birth influence cardiovascular risk in early adulthood? The Journal of Pediatrics 2012 161(3):390-96.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Wong WW, Hachey DL, Insull W, Opekun AR, Klein PD, Effect of dietary cholesterol on cholesterol synthesis in breast-fed and formula-fed infants J Lipid Res 1993 34(8):1403-11.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Harit D, Faridi MM, Aggarwal A, Sharma SB, Lipid profile of term infants on exclusive breastfeeding and mixed feeding: a comparative study European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2008 62(2):203-09.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CS, Richmond W, Fu PC, Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol Clin Chem 1974 20(4):470-75.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Wong WW, Cholesterol feeding during early infancy and its effects on cholesterol homeostasis Lipids in Infant Nutrition 1998 1st edChampaign, IllinoisAOCS Press:148-55.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Bayley TM, Alasmi M, Thorkelson T, Jones PJ, Corcoran J, Krug-Wispe S, Longer term effects of early dietary cholesterol level on synthesis and circulating cholesterol concentrations in human infants Metabolism 2002 51(1):25-33.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Owen CG, Whincup PH, Kaye SJ, Martin RM, Smith GD, Cook DG, Does initial breastfeeding lead to lower blood cholesterol in adult life? A quantitative review of the evidence Am J Clin Nutr 2008 88(2):305-14.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Singhal A, Lucas A, Early origins of cardiovascular disease: is there a unifying hypothesis? The Lancet 2004 363(9421):1642  [Google Scholar]

[27]Lucas A, Programming by early nutrition in man The childhood environment and adult disease 1991 1991:38-55.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Jones PJ, Pappu AS, Hatcher L, Li ZC, Illingworth DR, Connor WE, Dietary cholesterol feeding suppresses human cholesterol synthesis measured by deuterium incorporation and urinary mevalonic acid levels Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 1996 16(10):1222-28.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Lamont DW, Parker L, Cohen MA, White M, Bennett SM, Unwin NC, Early life and later determinants of adult disease: A 50 year follow-up study of the Newcastle Thousand Families cohort Public Health 1998 112(2):85-93.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA, Early flavor learning and its impact on later feeding behavior Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition 2009 48:S25-30.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Mennella JA, Griffin CE, Beauchamp GK, Flavor programming during infancy Pediatrics 2004 113(4):840-45.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Hausner H, Nicklaus S, Issanchou S, Mølgaard C, Møller P, Breastfeeding facilitates acceptance of a novel dietary flavour compound e-SPEN, the European e-Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 2009 4(5):e231-38.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA, Flavor perception in human infants: development and functional significance Digestion 2011 83(Suppl. 1):01-06.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Robinson S, Ntani G, Simmonds S, Syddall H, Dennison E, Sayer AA, Type of milk feeding in infancy and health behaviours in adult life: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study British Journal of Nutrition 2013 109(06):1114-22.  [Google Scholar]