JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dentistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/45173.14141
Year : 2020 | Month : Oct | Volume : 14 | Issue : 10 Full Version Page : ZC16 - ZC20

Prevalence of Oral Microbial Flora during Orthodontic Space Closure: A Pilot Study

Abirami Selvaraj1, Sumathi Felicita2, Smiline Girija3

1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Professor, Department of Microbiology, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Abirami Selvaraj, No. 162, Poonamalle High Road, Near Arvind Eye Hospital Chennai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: varshaabi77@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances especially during the retraction stage makes it challenging to maintain the oral hygiene. Attachments used, such as elastic chains, loops and springs, result in changes in the oral environment due to the accumulation of plaque and increase in the levels of bacterial count mainly Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli species.

Aim

To determine the prevalence of oral microbial flora during orthodontic space closure.

Materials and Methods

This was a cross-divtional pilot study conducted during the month of December 2019 which consisted of eight patients who were randomly selected among the age group of 18-25 years. Mean and SD of age in Males (4) and Females (4) were 22±2.16 years and 22.25±1.70 years, respectively and had reported to the Department of Orthodontics of a private dental college, Saveetha Dental College. In each patient, after 6-8 months of orthodontic treatment, plaque samples were collected only once around the orthodontic brackets at the cervical aspect of the maxillary lateral incisor, maxillary premolar, mandibular canine, mandibular premolar in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quadrant respectively, by the method of cotton swabbing for the evaluation of micro flora. Independent paired t-test and One-way ANOVA with Post-hoc Tukey HSD test were done to estimate the prevalence of microorganisms at different sites.

Results

Independent paired t-test showed highly significant differences in the levels of Streptococcus mutans when compared to Lactobacillus (p<0.001) with mean values of 4.8±2.5 and 23.1±9.2 for Streptococcus and Lactobacillus, respectively. One-way ANOVA with Post-hoc Turkey HSD analysis showed significant difference at the region of maxillary lateral incisor compared to other sites whereas Lactobacilli showed no significant differences between the various sites tested (p-value<0.001). Kappa statistics was performed which revealed an inter examiner reliability of 0.91.

Conclusion

During orthodontic space closure, bacterial count of Streptococcus mutans showed a statistically significant difference between different sites (maxillary lateral incisor, mandibular canines, maxillary and mandibular premolars) with highest being the maxillary incisor region followed by that of mandibular canines. However, the incidence of Lactobacillusacidophilus did not show any difference between the various sites evaluated.

Keywords

Introduction

Malocclusion is the third most common oral health problem and is associated with a number of complications such as gingivitis and periodontitis [1]. Orthodontic treatment with the help of fixed appliances is required for the correction of dental and skeletal discrepancies. Despite its obvious advantages in improving aesthetics, occlusal balance and function, it carries with it some side effects which sometimes occur due to poor oral hygiene maintenance. In these patients, oral hygiene may be more difficult to maintain due to the presence of attachments like brackets, wires, bands, which may lead to plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation [2]. Chang HS et al., reported that orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances induces changes in the oral environment, with an increase in the bacterial concentration mainly Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli sp., and concurrent alterations in buffering capacity, pH acidity and salivary flow rate. This may lead to enamel decalcification if preventive measures are not followed to their full capacity [3,4].

Proper maintenance of oral hygiene with fixed orthodontic appliances is difficult to maintain which will result in increased plaque accumulation. This is especially severe in the cervical region between the margins of brackets/buccal tubes/bands and marginal gingiva. Subsequently, it leaves the patient at an increased risk of decalcification and gingivitis [5]. In addition, insertion of fixed appliances favours frequent retention of fermentable carbohydrates which would increase the acid formation at a low pH level and thereby facilitate growth of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli sp., at the plaque retentive sites [6]. During orthodontic treatment, there is an increase in the number of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli sp., [7]. These bacteria may cause demineralisation or decalcification of dental enamel which leads to the subsequent development of White Spot Lesions (WSLs) adjacent to the orthodontic brackets. Without proper intervention, progression of these lesions can lead to dental caries.

The WSLs are defined as “subsurface enamel porosity from carious demineralisation [8]. They appear as a milky opacity when located on a smooth surface” [8]. The overall prevalence of WSLs has been reported with much variation in literature ranging between 2-97% [9]. The frequency of WSLs in orthodontically treated patients in decreasing order are maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular canines, mandibular first premolars, mandibular molars, mandibular second premolars, maxillary canine, maxillary first premolars, and central incisors [10,11]. No significant differences were found in the incidence and prevalence of WSLs between the right and left sides of the maxilla and mandible and also between males and females [10,12,13].

The WSLs begin to appear around the brackets within one month of bracket placement and these lesions are commonly seen on the buccal surfaces of teeth especially in the gingival region [14]. Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment showed a continuous increase in the levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli sp., levels but Streptococcus mutans showed significant difference only in the first month of treatment and marginal difference during retraction stages whereas lactobacilli counts were different in all treatment stages with diverse levels of significance [15]. Prevalence of oral microbial flora especially during the retraction stages (orthodontic space closure with friction mechanics) can be worsened by the use of attachments such as elastic chains, loops and springs.

The WSLs around fixed orthodontic appliances are a major challenge during and after fixed orthodontic treatment because it affects the dental and facial aesthetics and predisposes the teeth to dental caries. Hence, knowledge of the potential risk factors that predisposes teeth to lesions is important. Therefore, the aim of this pilot study was to estimate the prevalence of oral microbial flora during orthodontic space closure which may in turn help to determine the risk of development of WSLs and in turn lead to the development of appropriate preventive measures to control the demineralisation process before the lesions progress further.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study pilot study was carried out during the month of December 2019 for a period of two weeks in the Department of Orthodontics at Saveetha Dental College under the supervision of two blinded observers. Ethical clearance for the study protocol was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IHEC/SDC-ORTHO-1501/20/168) to conduct this research. It is a general rule that the sample size of the pilot study may be 10% of targeted population in the final research [16]. So, 8 patients undergoing treatment in the Orthodontic Department and at the stage of orthodontic space closure were randomly selected. They were within the age group of 18-25 years and gender was not considered and friction biomechanics was used to close the space. The sample consisted of four males and four females.

Inclusion criteria: Patients with full complement of permanent dentition, Skeletal class I with Angles class I malocclusion with moderate crowding (Little’s irregularity index, 4-6 mm), extraction of first premolar as a part of orthodontic treatment, patients undergoing orthodontic space closure with friction mechanics with the use of E-chain (Ormco) 1 month after start of space closure, pre-adjusted standard edgewise (Gemini 3M Unitek) appliance metal brackets, retraction by 19×25 SS wires (Captain Ortho) used for retraction were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of orthodontic treatment, patients with history of habits like drinking alcohol, and tobacco smoking, patients diagnosed with fluorosis, gingival and periodontal problems, those under antibiotics and oral mouth rinses past 3 months and patients with any other systemic disorders and nutritional deficiencies were excluded from the study.

Informed consent was obtained from participants after explaining about the study.

Collection of Specimens

Samples were collected twice, first at 6-8 months from the start of treatment and again 1-2 months after the start of the space closure step. All the samples were collected one hour after eating. All patients were asked to rinse the oral cavity with water to remove any residual food debris. All four quadrants were isolated with cotton rolls to avoid saliva contamination before collecting the sample. Plaque samples were collected in aseptic conditions, with the help of sterile cotton swabs moistened with sterile saline from the cervical region (labial/buccal surface) around the orthodontic brackets from the regions of maxillary lateral incisor, maxillary premolar, mandibular canine and mandibular premolar in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quadrants, respectively. Since, it is a cross-sectional study, the sample was collected only once from each site after the start of space closure. Thus, 4 samples were collected from each patient. The handle of sterile tube was held without any contamination at the time of use and it was transferred immediately into the sterile tube containing 2 mL of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth medium and it was delivered to the Microbiology laboratory [Table/Fig-1].

Collection of specimens in a transport vial with broth from different sites on the oral cavity from the orthodontic patients.

Estimation of Microbial Counts

The swab was inoculated in the tube containing 2 mL of BHI broth for bacterial isolation and identification and was incubated at 37°C for 2 hours [17]. Serial dilutions were not performed since the count of bacteria was done by using mere mathematical calculation from 10 μL. After 2 hours, 10 μL of the broth was inoculated onto freshly prepared Mutans Sanguis agar (HiMedia Laboratories) for Streptococcus mutans isolation and MRS agar (HiMedia Laboratories) for Lactobacillus isolation. Other bacteria such as Actinomyces, Prevotella, Neisseria, and Veillonella usually harbour the tooth surfaces. Since these are present at small concentrations and do not contribute to demineralisation, they were not evaluated in this study [18]. The culture plates were then incubated at 37°C, for 24 hours for Streptococcus mutans [19] and 48 hours for Lactobacillus, respectively [20]. Bacterial growth was identified and evaluated directly as visible colonies in their respective agar plates. S. mutans colonies were identified as rough yellow heaped colonies with white frosty glass appearance [19] whereas Lactobacillus were identified as irregular, creamy white coloured, circular, low convex colonies with entire margin [21]. Gram staining was performed and S.mutans was observed as gram positive cocci in chains and Lactobacillus as gram positive bacilli in chains. Biochemical characterisation assay test catalase test was performed to confirm the bacterial strain, which identified both as catalase negative and were calibrated manually by two independent assessors with the help of a colony counter (Manti Lab) [22] and were measured in terms of colony forming units (cfu/mL) [Table/Fig-2,3]. Kappa statistics was performed which revealed an inter-examiner reliability of 0.91.

Estimation of colony counts from Mutans Sanguis (MS) agar to determine the colony forming units at different sites.

Estimation of colony counts from deMan, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar to determine the colony forming units at different sites.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used for data summarisation. An independent sample t-test was done to determine the mean and standard deviation between S. mutans and Lactobacilli at the four evaluated sites. One-way ANOVA and Post-Hoc Tukey HSD test was done to estimate the prevalence of the microorganisms at the different sites. The statistical analysis was carried out by using SPSS Software (IBM Corp, Version 13) and the level of significance was fixed at p≤0.05.

Results

A total of 8 patients were included in the study. Out of these 4 were males and 4 were females. Mean and SD of age in Males and Females were 22±2.16 years and 22.25±1.70 years, respectively [Table/Fig-4].

Distribution of study subjects according to gender and age.

GenderMalesFemales
Number of patients44
Mean Age±SD (Years)22±2.1622.25±1.70

The microbiological data is presented in [Table/Fig-5,6].

ANOVA shows Streptococcus mutans showed highly significant difference compared to lactobacillus (p<0.001).

Bacteria studiedSitesNMean (×102) cfu/mLStd. deviation (×102) cfu/mLSignificant difference
Streptococcus1287.071.68<0.001
3386.321.41
2582.651.39
4583.152.01
Total324.82.50
Lactobacilllus12825.124.040.146
33827.869.41
25821.6611.40
45817.758.96
Total3223.19.27

One-way ANOVA with Post-hoc Tukey HSD analysis to estimate the prevalence of microbial flora at various sites p<0.05.

Dependent variable sitesMean difference (I-J)Significance95% Confidence intervalSignificant difference
Lower boundUpper bound
Streptococcus12330.750.800-1.492.99<0.001
254.42<0.0012.176.67
453.92<0.0011.676.17
3312-0.750.800-2.991.49
253.670.0011.425.92
453.170.0030.925.42
2512-4.42<0.001-6.67-2.17
33-3.670.001-5.92-1.42
45-0.500.929-2.741.74
4512-3.92<0.001-6.17-1.67
33-3.170.003-5.42-0.92
250.500.929-1.742.74
Lactobacilllus1233-2.730.926-14.869.380.146
253.460.863-8.6615.58
457.370.363-4.7419.49
33122.730.926-9.3814.86
256.200.512-5.9218.32
4510.110.128-2.0122.23
2512-3.460.863-15.588.66
33-6.200.512-18.325.92
453.910.815-8.2116.03
4512-7.370.363-19.494.74
33-10.110.128-22.232.01
25-3.910.815-16.038.21

Out of 8 patients, collected microbiological data showed that Streptococcus mutans was highly significant compared to Lactobacillus acidophilus (p<0.001) indicating that streptococcus is the main cause for the development of WSLs. It is interesting to note that the number of colonies of lactobacillus was greater than the colonies of streptococcus mutans during the stage of retraction. This may be due to the change in the local oral environment during the retraction phase. However, further elaborate studies need to be conducted to confirm the validity of this finding [Table/Fig-5].

From [Table/Fig-6], bacterial count of Streptococcus mutans was highly significant among the different sites (p-value <0.001) mainly in the maxillary incisor (12) region and also in mandibular canine (33) region and the difference in colony forming units of Lactobacillus acidophilus was not found to be statistically significant among the different sites.

Discussion

The present investigation was performed as a pilot study and showed an increase in the prevalence of microbial flora that occurred in the oral environment during orthodontic space closure approximately 6-8 months since placement of fixed appliances on permanent dentition. Although there are few studies that report the prevalence of microbial flora during and after orthodontic treatment, the microbial flora that may occur specifically during orthodontic space closure has not been evaluated [4,7,23]. The reason behind this was that among the three stages of orthodontic treatment, the second stage (space closure) is one of the most challenging and crucial aspects for orthodontists due to the large number of biomechanical options available for space closure and also due to the variation in the period of treatment time. The longer duration of treatment might be responsible for development of WSLs. In this study, plaque collection was performed only on specific sites such as, maxillary lateral incisor, maxillary premolar, mandibular canine and mandibular premolar in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quadrants, respectively, because these sites are more prone for the development of WSLs [10,11]. No articles were found regarding the effect of right or left-handedness on oral microbial flora in orthodontic patients and it is not feasible to collect samples from all the teeth.

Orthodontic patients have an increased risk of carious lesions due to higher retention of dental plaque and impaired oral hygiene. Colonisation of aciduric bacteria can cause demineralisation of enamel which leads to the development of WSLs and decay [24]. There is a significant difference in the number of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli sp., between patients who are undergoing and who are not undergoing orthodontic treatment [25].

Streptococcus mutans is the main cause of dental decay and various lactobacilli are associated with progression of the lesion. Demineralisation of enamel is visible after 3 months of active orthodontic treatment due to increase in the levels of S.mutans and Lactobacillus which ferment the carbohydrates and create a low pH environment induced by acid production [3,26]. Excess composite around the bracket base and presence of a distinct gap at the composite-enamel interface is a critical site for plaque accumulation making it necessary to sample the plaque from the tooth surface [27]. Among the different samples collected for assessment such as saliva, tongue, mirror, and plaque, Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus were consistently higher in plaque than in other sampling techniques and plaque samples have consistently been used to evaluate site-specific Streptococcus mutans levels to predict caries risk on specific tooth surfaces [28]. Dental plaque collection and samples of stimulated whole saliva showed similar results in Streptococcus mutans counts. However, the most appropriate method for detection of lactobacilli is the stimulated whole saliva method [29]. Based on this study [29], lack of significance in testing Lactobacillus acidophilus in the present study may be due to the use of plaque samples for determination of Lactobacillus acidophilus count. Therefore, measuring Lactobacillus acidophilus from stimulated saliva may be considered in future studies. The Plaque sample method shows a significant difference in Streptococcus mutans count compared to the use of saliva method [30]. Among different sampling approaches, cotton swabbing is a low-cost and practical method, validating the use of the swab as the preferred oral sampling approach [31]. Hence, in the present study, samples were collected from dental plaque by cotton swabbing method.

Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment showed a continuous increase in the levels of Lactobacilli but not in the levels of Streptococcus mutans. Streptococcus mutans showed significant difference only in the first month of treatment and marginal difference at retraction stages but lactobacilli counts were different in all stages with diverse levels of significance [15]. This study evaluated microbial content after the placement of elastic chain and loop for space closure.

There are conflicting reports in literature regarding the distribution of WSLs. Some studies showed that the most commonly affected tooth was maxillary lateral incisor [9-11]. Other studies showed that first molars were the most commonly affected teeth [24]. The present study also showed that maxillary lateral incisor was the most commonly affected tooth followed by mandibular canine due to the significant increase in the streptococcus mutans in that region compared to the other sites. Gender distribution was also conflicting with no significant difference between the genders in incidence of WSLs in some studies [12,13] in contrast to other studies in which gender differences were present [10]. Frequency of WSLs was not significantly different among the age groups in some studies [13] in contrast to other studies which showed a significant difference among the age groups [11,12]. Good oral hygiene is the most important prophylactic measure to prevent WSLs in fixed orthodontic patients. In addition prophylaxis with topical fluorides and others including Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) complexes, antiseptics, probiotics, polyols, sealants, lasers, tooth bleaching, resin infiltration, and microabrasion have also been recommended [32]. Recommended usage of fluoride and casein supplements in ameliorating WSLs during and after fixed orthodontic treatment is significantly effective in the reduction of demineralisation spots. This will be possible by using materials containing fluoride and/or casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate to manage and prevent the WSLs [33].

Two studies showed that the prevalence of WSL in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment as early as 6 months (38% and 40%, respectively), increased with longer treatment duration at 12 months (46% and 43%, respectively) [8,24]. Orthodontic treatment time appears to have a significant impact on the development of WSLs in some studies [9,11,13] in contrast to other findings in which there was no significant impact of treatment time on the development of WSLs [12]. Orthodontic treatment with clear aligner therapy showed a low incidence of WSLs [13].

Significant increase in the levels of Streptococcus mutans during orthodontic treatment reported in this study is similar to those published in existing literature [23,34]. Use of self-ligating brackets, properly contoured bands not impinging into the gingival sulcus, Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) for banding in addition to the mechanical methods of plaque control such as brushing, flossing, etc., chemical methods such as mouthwashes, varnishes, etc., should be employed to reduce the plaque accumulation [18]. Indirect bonding protocol and super slick elastomeric ligatures should be used for reduction in plaque accumulation around the brackets which will aid in decreasing the onset of white spots during the orthodontic treatment [35].

Limitation(s)

Since the present study was a pilot study, a control group was not considered. The study being a preliminary one requires further experimental validation with a higher sample size. Some aciduric flora such as Actinomyces spp., and Candida albicans which also have an effect on the demineralisation of teeth [36] have not been evaluated in this study.

Conclusion(s)

This study showed that during orthodontic space closure, bacterial count of Streptococcus mutans showed a statistically significant difference among the different sites (maxillary lateral incisor, mandibular canines, maxillary and mandibular premolars) with the highest value in the maxillary lateral incisor region followed by mandibular canine region.

The incidence of Lactobacillus acidophilus did not show any statistically significant difference among the various sites. Considerable amount of plaque accumulation occurs during the orthodontic space closure procedures, which may increase the onset of WSLs hence, more attention should be given to oral hygiene maintenance by using plaque control methods. The results from this study would be used as a guide to formulate a more standardised research protocol for future researches.

References

[1]Guo L, Feng Y, Guo H-G, Liu BW, Zhang Y, Consequences of orthodontic treatment in malocclusion patients: Clinical and microbial effects in adults and children BMC Oral Health 2016 16(1):11210.1186/s12903-016-0308-727793138  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Bollen A-M, Cunha-Cruz J, Bakko DW, Huang GJ, Hujoel PP, The effects of orthodontic therapy on periodontal health The Journal of the American Dental Association 2008 139(4):413-22.10.14219/jada.archive.2008.018418385025  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Chang HS, Walsh LJ, Freer TJ, The effect of orthodontic treatment on salivary flow, pH, buffer capacity, and levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli Aust Orthod J 1999 15(4):229-34.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Lucchese A, Bondemark L, Marcolina M, Manuelli M, Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: A systematic review Journal of Oral Microbiology 2018 10(1):147664510.1080/20002297.2018.147664529988826  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Shrestha S, Sharma AK, Lamichhane B, Oral health status in patients with fixed orthodontic appliance with molar bands and bonded tubes Orthodontic Journal of Nepal 2016 6(1):27-31.10.3126/ojn.v6i1.16176  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[6]Mummolo S, Marchetti E, Giuca MR, Gallusi G, Tecco S, Gatto R, In-office bacteria test for a microbial monitoring during the conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment Head Face Med 2013 9:710.1186/1746-160X-9-723375053  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Mummolo S, Tieri M, Nota A, Caruso S, Darvizeh A, Albani F, Salivary concentrations of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli during an orthodontic treatment. An observational study comparing fixed and removable orthodontic appliances Clin Exp Dent Res 2020 6(2):181-87.10.1002/cre2.26132250562  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ, Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances Angle Orthod 2011 81(2):206-10.10.2319/051710-262.121208070  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Julien KC, Buschang PH, Campbell PM, Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment Angle Orthod 2013 83(4):641-47.10.2319/071712-584.123289733  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ, Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding Am J Orthod 1982 81(2):93-98.10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-X  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[11]Khalaf K, Factors affecting the formation, severity and location of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances J Oral Maxillofac Res 2014 5(1):e410.5037/jomr.2014.510424800054  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Akin M, Tazcan M, Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Incidence of white spot lesion during fixed orthodontic treatment Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 2013 26(2):98-102.10.13076/j.tjo.2013.26.02_98  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Azeem M, Hamid WU, Incidence of white spot lesions during orthodontic clear aligner therapy J World Fed Orthod 2017 6:127-30.10.1016/j.ejwf.2017.07.001  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Mattousch T, van der Veen M, Zentner A, Caries lesions after orthodontic treatment followed by quantitative light-induced fluorescence: A 2-year follow-up The European Journal of Orthodontics 2007 29(3):294-98.10.1093/ejo/cjm00817483494  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Edith LC, Montiel-Bastida NM, Leonor SP, Jorge AT, Changes in the oral environment during four stages of orthodontic treatment Korean J Orthod 2010 40(2):95-105.10.4041/kjod.2010.40.2.95  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[16]Connelly LM, Pilot studies Medsurg Nurs 2008 17(6):411-12.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Pfepper LA, Bacterial adherence of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus on poly-methyl methacrylate and thermoplastic polypropene used in orthodontic retention University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2011   [Google Scholar]

[18]Chawla R, Shetty KS, Prakash AT, Rathore APS, Saroch S, Orthodontics and Oral Microflora: Synergism or Parasitism J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci 2018 6(3):02-03.10.4172/2572-0813.1000121  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[19]Sogi S, Patidar D, Singh V, Shinu P, Loomba A, Patidar D, Salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis in early childhood caries: An in vivo study Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 2018 36(4):386-90.10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_204_1830324930  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Jena PK, Trivedi D, Thakore K, Chaudhary H, Giri SS, Seshadri S, Isolation and characterisation of probiotic properties of Lactobacilli isolated from rat fecal microbiota Microbiol Immunol 2013 57(6):407-16.10.1111/1348-0421.1205423773019  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Chakraborty A, Bhowal J, Isolation, identification and analysis of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus spp. From selected regional dairy product Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 2015 4(6):621-28.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Brugger SD, Baumberger C, Jost M, Jenni W, Brugger U, Mühlemann K, Automated counting of bacterial colony forming units on agar plates PLoS One 2012 7(3):e3369510.1371/journal.pone.003369522448267  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Shukla C, Maurya RK, Singh V, Tijare M, Evaluation of changes in Streptococcus mutans colonies in microflora of the Indian population with fixed orthodontics appliances Dent Res J 2016 13(4):309-14.10.4103/1735-3327.18787627605987  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Lucchese A, Gherlone E, Prevalence of white-spot lesions before and during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances Eur J Orthod 2013 35(5):664-68.10.1093/ejo/cjs07023045306  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Maret D, Marchal-Sixou C, Vergnes JN, Hamel O, Georgelin-Gurgel M, Van Der Sluis L, Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on salivary microbial parameters at 6 months: A controlled observational study J Appl Oral Sci 2014 22(1):38-43.10.1590/1678-77572013031824626247  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Loesche WJ, Microbiology of Dental Decay and Periodontal Disease. In: Baron S, editor Medical Microbiology 2011 Galveston (TX)University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston  [Google Scholar]

[27]Sunil PC, Michael T, Raju AS, Paul RK, Mamatha J, Ebin TM, Evaluation of micro-organism in ligated metal and self-ligating brackets using scanning electron microscopy: An in vivo study J Int Oral Health 2015 7(7):58-62.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Richards VP, Alvarez AJ, Luce AR, Bedenbaugh M, Mitchell ML, Burne RA, Microbiomes of site-specific dental plaques from children with different caries status Infect Immun 2017 85(8):e00106-17.10.1128/IAI.00106-17  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[29]Motisuki C, Lima LM, Spolidorio DMP, Santos-Pinto L, Influence of sample type and collection method on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. counts in the oral cavity Archives of Oral Biology 2005 50(3):341-45.10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.08.00715740713  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Seki M, Karakama F, Ozaki T, Yamashita Y, An improved method for detecting mutans streptococci using a commercial kit J Oral Sci 2002 44(3-4):135-39.10.2334/josnusd.44.13512613502  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Hernández-Arriaga A, Baumann A, Witte OW, Frahm C, Bergheim I, Changes in oral microbial ecology of C57BL/6 mice at different ages associated with sampling methodology Microorganisms 2019 7(9):28310.3390/microorganisms709028331443509  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Kachuie M, Khoroushi M, Prevention and treatment of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2017 8(1):11-19.10.4103/ccd.ccd_216_1728566845  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Lopatiene K, Borisovaite M, Lapenaite E, Prevention and treatment of white spot lesions during and after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances: A systematic literature review J Oral Maxillofac Res 2016 7(2):e110.5037/jomr.2016.720127489605  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[34]Jing D, Hao J, Shen Y, Tang G, Lei L, Zhao Z, Effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on oral microbiota and salivary proteins Exp Ther Med 2019 17(5):4237-43.10.3892/etm.2019.7401  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[35]Jitendra Bhagchandani, Ashish Kumar Singh, Praveen Mehrotra, Shashi Kumar H C, Shruti Raj Varshney, Krati Raj Varshney, Microbial colonisation around orthodontic ligature ties: An in-vivo study APOS Trends in Orthodontics 2013 3(3):72-77.10.4103/2321-1407.115979  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[36]Beerens MW, Ten Cate JM, van der Veen MH, Microbial profile of dental plaque associated to white spot lesions in orthodontic patients immediately after the bracket removal Arch Oral Biol 2017 78:88-93.10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.01128222388  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]