Endodontic Treatment of a Maxillary Second Molar with Two Separate Palatal Roots: A Case Report
Bonny Paul1, Kavita Dube2
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Hitkarini Dental College & Hospital, Jabalpur, India.
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Hitkarini Dental College & Hospital, Jabalpur, India.
NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Bonny Paul, Department of Conservative dentistry & Endodontics, Hitkarini Dental College & Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh-482002, India.
Phone: +91 9300549495,
E-mail: bonnypaul40@gmail.com
The incidence of a two palatal rooted maxillary second molar has rarely been seen in literature [1]. Libfeld and Rotstein, in a radiographic survey done on 1200 teeth, reported a 0.4% incidence of four rooted maxillary second molars. Christie reported 14 cases of maxillary second molars with two palatal roots in a period of 40 years. Slowey reported a maxillary molar with two palatal roots [2]. A precise radiographic examination alerts the clinician to the presence of a varied root canal anatomy. A surgical operating microscope has been found to be particularly useful, as it gives the clinician the opportunity to distinguish microstructures that are not distinctly seen with the naked eye [3].
A 32-year-old, female with a non contributory medical history was referred to the Department of Endodontics, Hitkarini Dental College, Jabalpur, with spontaneous pain in maxillary right posterior teeth, which aggravated on chewing and thermal stimuli since the past 3 days. Clinical examination revealed a fixed partial denture (FDP) involving second premolar and second molar as abutments [Table/Fig-1]. Cold vitality testing done on maxillary second molar caused severe lingering pain. The FPD was removed under local anaesthesia and the teeth were temporized. Second molar still revealed severe tenderness to percussion and a premature response to electric stimulation on the next day. A diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with apical periodontitis was made. An access cavity was prepared under local anaesthesia after rubber dam isolation. A clinical examination done with a DG 16 explorer revealed four orifices (mesoibuccal, distobuccal, mesiopalatal and distopalatal).The access cavity was modified to a square shape, to clearly expose the distopalatal orifice. The working length was determined using an apex locator (Root ZX; Morita). Multiple radiographs taken [Table/Fig-2 and 3], confirmed the presence of four separate roots. The case was classified under Type 3 Christie et al’s. classification. A biomechanical preparation was made by using crown down technique. The middle and apical third of the teeth were instrumented using flexofiles (Dentsply Maillefer) while irrigating with normal saline and 3% NaOCl. The canals were dried and obturated using lateral condensation technique with guttapercha and AHplus (Dentsply) sealer [Table/Fig-4]. A recall after one week showed that the patient was asymptomatic.
![](/articles/images/3866//jcdr-7-3127-g001.jpg)
![](/articles/images/3866//jcdr-7-3127-g002.jpg)
![](/articles/images/3866//jcdr-7-3127-g003.jpg)
Post obturation radiograph
![](/articles/images/3866//jcdr-7-3127-g004.jpg)
The prevalence of maxillary second molar with two palatal roots is very rare. However, clinicians ought to be aware of the possibilities, as nontreatment of one canal could lead to endodontic failure.
[1]. Christie WH, Peikoff MD, Fogel HM, Maxillary molars with two palatal roots: a retrospective clinical study J Endod 1991 17:80-4. [Google Scholar]
[2]. Libfeld H, Rostein I, Incidence of four rooted maxillary second molars: literature review and radiography survey of 1200 teeth J. Endod 1989 15:129-31. [Google Scholar]
[3]. Slowey R, Radiographic aids in the detection of extra root canal Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Radiol Endod 1974 28:419-25. [Google Scholar]