A Rare Case of Delayed Pulmonary Oedema due to Methemoglobinemia Following Laparoscopic Chromopertubation with Methyleneblue
Veerendrakumar CM1, Joshi Suyajna D2, Madhu YR3
1 Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vijayanagara Institute of Medical Sciences, Bellary, Karnataka, India.
2 Professor and Unit Chief, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, HQH, Ananthpur Road, Vijayanagara Institute of Medical Sciences, Bellary, Karnataka, India.
3 Postgraduate Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hqh, Ananthpur Road, Vijayanagara Institute of Medical Sciences, Bellary, Karnataka, India.
NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Veerendrakumar CM, Mandara 1st main 3rd cross basaveshwaranagara, Bellary-583103, India.
Phone: +919886275656,
E-mail: veerendrakumarcm@gmail.com
The patient is a young infertile lady with right tubal block on hysterosalpingogram was subjected for diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy.Hysterolaparoscopy findings were normal. Transcervical chromopertubation was performed using 20 -30 ml of diluted methylene blue through hysterosalpingogram cannula. Hesitant flow of dye was noted on left side after 2-3 flushing attempts. Ampullary block noted on right side with no spillage of the dye. Patient made an uneventful anaesthetic recovery. Five hours later patient developed tachypnea,hypotension and bluish colored urine was drained. She was shifted to ICU and patient eventually recovered after hemodynamic support with oxygen, steroids and inotropes. Spectrophotometric analysis showed methemoglobin levels of 26.3%. This case is reported for its rare but potentially fatal complication of pulmonary oedema following methylene blue. In this case pulmonary oedema manifested late in the postoperative period compared to other reported cases in the literature where pulmonary oedema was seen during intraoperative period.
Case Report
The patient is a 25-year-old infertile lady presented to our hospital with primary infertility for 10-years. Her general physical and systemic examinations were with in normal limits. Hysterosalpingogram (HSG) showed right fimbrial block [Table/Fig-1]. Ultrasound examination of the abdomen and pelvis was normal and follicular study was suggestive of ovulation.
HSG showing right fimbrial block
![](/articles/images/4462//jcdr-8-OD05-g001.jpg)
She underwent diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy under general anaesthesia on December 7,2013. Hysteroscopy showed normal uterine cavity, both the ostia were visualized and looked normal. Uterus, tubes and ovaries appeared normal, POD was clear.Transcervical chromopertubation was done using 20-30 ml of diluted 1% methylene blue dye through HSG cannula. Hesitant flow of dye was noted on left side after 2-3 flushing attempts and ampullary block noted on right side with no spillage of dye. Patient made an uneventful anaesthetic recovery at 11:00 hrs.
Five hours later, around 16:00 hrs patient complained of giddiness while voiding urine. On examination she was tachypnoeic, pulse was feeble with SBP of 70mm Hg. Peripheral oxygen saturation Spo2- 85%. Bilateral basal fine crepitations auscultated with falling O2 saturation. On catheterization, bluish colored urine was drained which cleared after few hours. Patient was given 100mg hydrocortisone and oxygen. Patient was shifted to ICU for cardiorespiratory support. Her chest X-ray showed features of pulmonary oedema. Patient was given inotropes, furosemide and oxygen inhalation. Oxygen saturation improved gradually and she was hemodynamically stable after 48 hours. Spectrophotometric analysis revealed methemoglobin level of 26.4%. PCR TB for endometrium was negative; HPR was negative for tubercular endometritis. G6 PD testing could not be done in our set up. Patient was shifted back to the ward from the ICU on December 10, 2013. She was discharged from the hospital on 7th postoperative day on December 14,2013 and doing well since then.
Discussion
Evaluation of tubal factor infertility is moving from mere anatomical assessment to morphological and functional enquiry of the patency of the tubes [1]. A first line laparoscopy is being increasingly used in the comprehensive evaluation of infertility. Laparoscopic chromopertubation with methylene blue is the gold standard for morphological and functional assessment of the tubes.
Traditionally methylene blue is widely used in various clinical conditions like detection of fistulae, tube patency tests and sentinel node biopsy in various malignancies and is considered as the safest among blue dyes. This is most likely due to rarity of the literature reporting anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions to methylene blue.
Life-threatening anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions to methylene blue have been reported in the literature [2, 3].
Methylene blue can extravasate intolymphatics particularly in chronic Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and genital Tuberculosis (TB) cases and manifest as methemoglobinemia [4]. Normally, methemoglobin levels are <1%, as measured by the co-oximetry test [5]. Cyanosis is the classic symptom of methemoglobinemia (methemoglobin>1%), other signs and symptoms include shortness of breath, mental status changes (~50%), headache, fatigue, exercise intolerance, dizziness and loss of consciousness. Severe methemoglobinemia (methemoglobin>50%) patients have dysrhythmias, seizures, coma and death (>70%) [6]. Healthy people may not have many symptoms with methemoglobin levels < 15%. However, patients with co-morbidities such as anaemia, cardiovascular disease, lung disease, sepsis and in individuals with G6PD deficiency, methylene blue can induce methemoglobinemia even at normal levels [7].
Nolan reported a case of inflammatory peritonitis with ascites after methylene blue dye chromopertubation during diagnostic laparoscopy [8]. Trikha et al., reported a case of pulmonary oedema following intrauterine methylene blue injection [6]. Millo et al., reported fatal pulmonary oedema following laparoscopic chromopertubation [9]. Mhaskar reported methemoglobinemia following chromopertubation in a treated pelvic tuberculosis case [10]. Few clinical cases with presumptive diagnosis in the absence of allergological assessment have been reported. Dewatcher et al., proved methylene blue as the cause of reaction by a cutaneous test [11]. In all these cases, anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions have occurred during intraoperative period or in the immediate postoperative period. In our case hypersensitivity reaction and methemoglobinemia occurred five hours after the conclusion of surgery. Salient features of reactions following methylene blue in various case reports are highlighted in [Table/Fig-2].
Comparison of reactions following Methylene Blue use
Authors | Pulmonary oedema | Evidence of TB | Post- operative status | Methemoglobin levels |
---|
Our case | Postoperative 5 hours later | No | recovered | 26.4% |
Mhaskar et al., [10] | Intraoperative | Yes | recovered | 9.4% |
Asha Rathi et al., [3] | Intraoperative | Yes | recovered | 8.9% |
T Millo et al., [9] | Postoperative- 15 mins later | No | Died | NA |
Trikha et al., [6] | Intraoperative | No | recovered | NA |
High index of suspicion, awareness about hypersensitivity reactions, vigilance during intraoperative period, aggressive cardiorespiratory support with use of steroids will help in avoiding morbidity and mortality.
With the unique exposure risks in the perioperative period, it is the surgeon’s responsibility to aid in the proper immediate and short-term treatment of anaphylaxis and anaphylactic-like reactions [12].
In our case pulmonary oedema could have occurred due to a delayed anaphylactoid reaction and methemoglobinemia due to systemic absorption of methylene blue. Whenever methylene blue is used for chromopertubation the possibility of potential dangerous complications should be borne in mind. Alternatively diluted povidone iodine can be used for chromo pertubation.
Conclusion
It is important to publish reports on adverse events from a technique which is commonly used in clinical practice.This rare case highlights the fact that methylene blue has the potential of causing life-threatening complications even after a non -systemic administration and late in the postoperative period. This confirms the need for continued vigilance during the postoperative period. Anesthesiologists and surgeons should be aware of the possibility of hypersensitivity reactions involving any drug or substance used during perioperative period.
[1]. Papaioannou S, Afnan M, Jafettas J, Tubal assessment tests: still have not found what we are looking for Reprod Biomed Online 2007 15(4):376-82. [Google Scholar]
[2]. Rzymski P, Wozniak J, Opala T, Wilczak M, Sajdak S, Anaphylactic reaction to methylene blue dye after laparoscopic chromopertubation Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003 81:71-2. [Google Scholar]
[3]. Rathi Asha, Rabbani Tamkin, Rasool Sabahat, Zebaalami Akthar Omar S, Dyed but not dead: metethemoglobinemia following chromopertubation with methylene blue South Asian federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010 2(1):69-70. [Google Scholar]
[4]. Marconi G, Quintana R, Methylene blue dyeing of cellular nuclei during salpingoscopy, a new in-vivo method to evaluate vitality of tubal epithelium Hum Reprod 1998 13:3414-7. [Google Scholar]
[5]. Ash-Bernal R, Wise R, Wright SM, Acquired methemoglobinemia: a retrospective series of 138 cases at 2 teaching hospitals Medicine (Baltimore) 2004 83(5):265-73. [Google Scholar]
[6]. Trikha A, Mohan V, Kashyap L, Saxena A, Pulmonary oedema following intrauterine methylene blue injection Actaanaesthesiolscand 1996 40:382-4. [Google Scholar]
[7]. Bilgin H, Ozcan B, Bilgin T, Methemoglobinemia induced by methylene bluepertubation during laparoscopy Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998 42(5):594-5. [Google Scholar]
[8]. Nolan DG, Inflammatory peritonitis with ascites after methylene blue dyechromopertubation during diagnostic laparoscopy J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 995 2(4):483-5. [Google Scholar]
[9]. Millo T, Mishra R, Giridhar S, Rajutji R, Lalwani S, Dogra TD, Fatal pulmonary oedema following laparoscopic chromopertubation national journals of India 2006 19(2):78-9. [Google Scholar]
[10]. Mhaskar R, Mhaskar AM, Methemoglobinemia following chromopertubation intreated pelvic tuberculosis Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002 77(1):41-2. [Google Scholar]
[11]. Dewachter P, Mouton-Faivre C, Trechot P, Lleu JC, Mertes PM, Severe anaphylactic shock with methylene blue instillation Anesth Analg 2005 101:149-50. [Google Scholar]
[12]. Giladi AM, Kasten SJ, Anaphylactic-like reaction to methylene blue: case report and review of perioperative hypersensitivity reactions Plast Reconstr Surg 2012 130(1):98e-105e. [Google Scholar]