Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 180343

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : ZC70 - ZC76 Full Version

Evaluation of Cell Adhesion and Proliferation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells to Different Root End Filling Materials: An In-vitro Study


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69077.19458
Shreshtha Mukherjee, Geeta Hiremath, Anil Bapu Bargale, Priya Horatti

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, S.D.M College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, S.D.M College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, S.D.M College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, S.D.M College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Shreshtha Mukherjee,
Flat-202A, Shubh Nirman CHS, Plot-1, Sec-3, New Panvel, Navi Mumbai-410206, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: shreshtha_pnik22@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Recent advancements in dental materials have led to the development of various restorative cements. The amalgamation of various biomimetic cements becomes necessary to improve the physico-chemical properties of the existing cements. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) Plus and Chitosan are two such materials which are combined and chosen to check their effects on dental stem cell adhesion and proliferation.

Aim: To compare and evaluate the cell adhesion and proliferation of human dental pulp stem cells on MTA Plus, MTA Plus-Chitosan Conjugate, and Chitosan by directly culturing the cells on the materials.

Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study was conducted at the Central Research Laboratory in Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, S.D.M College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India over a period of 1.5 years from the month of June 2020 to December 2021. The samples were divided into four groups: Group A-MTA Plus mixed with the proprietary gel (9 specimens), Group B-MTA Plus mixed with 2% Chitosan gel (9 specimens), Group C-2% Chitosan Gel (9 specimens), and Group D-Control Group (Growth Medium). Non carious extracted permanent human premolars for orthodontic purposes were collected and sectioned for the extraction of pulp tissue. The tissue was placed in a basic medium Dulbecco modified essential medium-High Glucose (DMEM-HG). Dental Pulp Stem Cells were subjected to differentiation using differentiation media (Hi-Media) containing Dexamethasone. Cell proliferation and viability were checked using trypan blue, and cell adhesion was checked using crystal violet under an inverted light microscope. To evaluate if there were any changes in the proliferation of viable cells at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours among different materials, the Wilcoxon’s Signed-rank Test was used. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05.

Results: The cells were able to adhere to the biomaterial and showed a spindle-shaped morphology, which was observed under the inverted light microscope. ALP activity was measured using a photometer after cell differentiation. MTA Plus-Chitosan conjugate showed a 94% increase in cell proliferation after 48 hours (n=86/91). MTA Plus showed a 91% increase in cell proliferation after 48 hours (n=109/120).

Conclusion: Chitosan can be used as a vehicle with MTA since their conjugate showed greater proliferation activity after stem cell culture.

Keywords

Cell proliferation, Chitosan, Mesenchymal stem cell, Odontoblasts

Caries is an irreversible microbial disease that leads to demineralisation of the inorganic content and dissolution of the organic component of the tooth. Untimely management often leads to the progression of caries and subsequently leads to pulpal damage. During this process, the natural repair process is stimulated, leading to the formation of new odontoblasts that produce new dentin. This observation suggests the possibility that dental pulp contains mesenchymal cells that provide a source of cells that facilitate repair (1).

This observation led to various studies on the mesenchymal cells that can help in the regeneration of damaged cells. The isolation of stem cells from extracted teeth was first reported by Gronthos, leading to studies on the effect of various materials on dental pulp stem cells (2). Their attachment and spreading on material surfaces are important aspect that play a crucial role in dental pulp repair. Cell adhesion to bioactive materials is important in stimulating signals that regulate cell differentiation, migration, and survival (3). Higher expression of fibroblast growth factor and transforming growth factor β was observed in Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSCs) when cell proliferation increased (4).

Dental restorative materials can affect the surrounding structures of teeth they come in contact with (enamel, dentin, cementum, bone) either directly or indirectly. Ions are released from the material into the pulp via open dentinal tubules, stimulating tissue response either during or after the setting process. Therefore, restorative materials should be assessed not only for their chemical, physical, and mechanical characteristics but also for their biocompatibility (5). Any assessment of biocompatibility requires an evaluation of cytotoxicity, i.e., the effect of a material on cell viability (4).

Over the years, various materials have been tried and tested for repair purposes. The most commonly and frequently used material in recent years is Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). MTA is a calcium silicate-based material that consists of tricalcium silicate, dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, bismuth oxide, calcium sulfate, and gypsum. It has been widely used in conservative and endodontic treatment, including root end filling, direct pulp capping, and regenerative endodontic procedures. Moreover, the versatile properties of MTA, including biocompatibility, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties, make it a promising candidate for tissue engineering applications (6),(7). Unfortunately, it suffers from several deficiencies, such as poor workability and prolonged setting time (8).

To overcome these deficiencies, newer materials have been introduced into the market. MTA Plus (Prevest Denpro) is a material similar to MTA with a finer particle size and better handling properties that have been released into the market. Another material widely used in the medical field for various applications is Chitosan.

Chitosan is a natural biodegradable polymer produced by the deacetylation of chitin. It is derived from naturally occurring sources, such as the exoskeletons of insects, crustaceans such as crabs, shrimps, prawns, lobsters, and the cell walls of some fungi such as aspergillus and Mucor (9). Chitosan is an ideal material for biomedical applications because of its distinctive biological properties, including good biodegradability, biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and antimicrobial properties. It is also a candidate material for hard tissue repair and regeneration (10).

Chitosan, as a vehicle, has been widely discussed in research papers due to its property to coat and protect the molecules of dental materials from degradation. It serves as a semi-synthetic extracellular matrix to provide an amenable environment for cellular adherence and remodelling (11).

Studies must be performed, especially on human cells, to ensure that these new materials are biocompatible when in close contact with living tissues. The compounds in them may either interfere with the healing process or repair the damaged tissue. The incorporation of various particles into each other can not only improve their physiochemical properties but also their biocompatibility, pH, sealing ability, and calcium-releasing ability (8).

Thus, the present study develops a novel approach of using chitosan as a vehicle to mix MTA Plus. The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the cell adhesion and proliferation of human dental pulp stem cells on MTA Plus, MTA Plus-Chitosan Conjugate, and Chitosan by directly culturing the cells on the materials.

Material and Methods

This in-vitro study was conducted at the Central Research Lab in Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, S.D.M College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, over a period of 1.5 years. The cultivation of stem cells was started in June 2020 and completed in December 2021. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethical Committee of the Institution (IRB NO- 2019/P/CONS/71).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria included non carious extracted vital permanent human teeth. Exclusion criteria were dental caries involving the dental pulp, fractured teeth, sclerosed teeth, calcified pulp chambers, and non vital teeth.

Sample size calculation (12):

n=2sp 2[z1-α/2+s1-β]2

Sp=s12+s22/2

where,

s12 : Standard Deviation in First Group
s22 : Standard Deviation in Second Group
μd2 : Mean Difference between the samples
α : Significance Level
1-β : Power

Study Procedure

Sample preparation: The MTA Plus powder was mixed with its gel as recommended by the manufacturers. For conjugates, each material was mixed with 2% chitosan gel. The materials were grouped as follows:

Group A: MTA Plus mixed with the proprietary gel (9 specimens)
Group B: MTA Plus mixed with 2% Chitosan gel (9 specimens)
Group C: 2% Chitosan Gel (9 specimens)
Group D: Control Group (Growth Medium)

All biomaterials were condensed into specimen molds (2±0.1 mm diameter×2±0.1 mm). Each group had 9 specimens as the study was done in triplicates in three different experiments at three different time intervals, i.e., 24, 48, and 72 hours (13),(14). They were then incubated in a CO2 incubator at 37°C with a 100% humidified atmosphere for 24 hours to ensure complete setting.

1. Extraction of dental pulp: A total of 27 non carious extracted permanent human premolars for orthodontic purposes were collected from the Department of Oral Surgery (Table/Fig 1)a. The teeth were then disinfected with a 3% sodium hypochlorite solution for two minutes and rinsed with Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) thrice. The teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction, and the pulp was exposed. The sectioned teeth were placed into the Transport Media (TM) containing basic medium Dulbecco Modified Essential Medium-High Glucose (DMEM-HG) supplemented with 20% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 1% Antibiotic Antimycotic (ABAM) (Hi-Media- A002A-20 mL) and transferred to the Central Research Laboratory for subsequent processing and culture (8).

A 100 mm petri plate (Hi-Media) was set up for the processing of each tooth in a biohazard laminar flow hood (Thermofisher) under aseptic conditions. Sectioned teeth were decanted in a petri plate. Teeth were held with sterile forceps, and pulp tissue was gently extirpated using an endodontic H-file #30 (MANI, Inc, USA) (Table/Fig 1)b. The pulp tissue was placed in PBS containing a 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Hi-Media) in a petri plate for 10 to 20 minutes and then washed with PBS (Hi-Media) for 10 minutes each.

2. Preparation of dental pulp stem cells: The pulp tissue was then transferred into a petri plate containing DMEM-HG with 20% FBS and minced into 1-2 mm3 using a surgical blade (Table/Fig 1)c. The minced fragments were plated in a T-25 flask containing DMEM-HG supplemented with 20% FBS, 1% antibiotic and antimycotic, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 2 mM L-glutamine (Hi-Media) (Table/Fig 2). Explants were cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

Colonies were observed daily under an inverted microscope (Motic) for any contamination or cell growth via migration from explants. When cells reached 70 to 80% confluency, they were either used for an assay or cryopreserved for later use.

Dental pulp stem cells were subjected to differentiation using differentiation media (Hi-Media) containing Dexamethasone (DMEM-HG+10% FBS+2% ABAM, Dexa-40 ng/mL). The cells were allowed to differentiate for 10-15 days, and the morphology was monitored daily.

3. Verification of dental pulp stem cells to be odontoblasts: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) activity was carried out for newly-differentiated odontoblast-like cells using the ALP assay kit. This test confirmed that the differentiated cells were odontoblasts, and the differentiated cells were used to perform the experiment (8).

Estimation of Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) (15),(16),(17): The ALP activity was carried out for newly-differentiated odontoblast-like cells using the ALP assay kit.

Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Assay protocol:

1. Cells were washed with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and then homogenised in 200 μL buffer.
2. The cellular debris was separated by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for five minutes.
3. The reaction mixture was prepared in Eppendorf tubes.
4. The colour intensity was measured at 510 nm using a multiwell spectrophotometer.
5. The ALP activity was measured by comparing it with a standard solution.
6. The results are expressed in IU/L.

Observation: Absorbance (A) readings were noted as shown in (Table/Fig 3). Four test tubes were marked as follows: Blank (B), Standard (S), Test (T), and Control (C). The enzyme activity was expressed in terms of IU/L, where 7.1 is for the conversion of KA units to IU/L:

Phenol liberated by 0.1 mL of lysate= AT-AC/AS-AB×0.01 mg/0.01 mL×100

Phenol liberated by 0.1 mL of lysate= AT-AC/AS-AB×10×7.1

AS-Absorbance of Standard sample
AB-Absorbance of Blank
AC-Absorbance of Control
AT-Absorbance of Test

4. Cell proliferation and viability assay with trypan blue (18): Cells that reached 60-65% confluency were briefly trypsinised and resuspended in complete media. Equal volumes of cell suspension and 0.4% trypan blue (Gibco) were mixed, and 10 μL of the prepared sample was loaded using micropipettes in the chamber of a hemocytometer. Viable and nonviable cells were counted manually. Counting was performed in duplicate as shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Calculations for cell proliferation (19):

Percentage of viable cells=Number of viable cells/Total number of cells×100
Average of cells/square=Number of viable cells/Number of squares
Dilution factor=Final volume/Volume of cells

Concentration of viable cells=average of cells per square×Dilution factor×104

5. Crystal violet assay for cell adhesion (20): The crystal violet assay was conducted to check cell adhesion. The materials were coated on the 12-well plates. Differentiated odontoblastic cells from the third and fourth generations were seeded into biomaterial cell culture plates at a density of 104 cells and incubated in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37°C for 24, 48, and 72 hours. The images were captured on a Motic camera at 20X magnification. Simultaneously, in another plate, cells were stained with 0.2% crystal violet, and the viable cells were counted manually using a hemocytometer. This assay is useful for obtaining quantitative information about the relative density of cells adhering to multi-well cluster dishes as crystal violet will stain the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA).

Results

The Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells (hDPSCs) were differentiated into odontoblasts using differentiation medium. ALP activity was measured using a photometer after cell differentiation. Increased ALP activity indicates that cells have differentiated into odontoblasts since they are highly expressed in osteo/odontogenic differentiated cells. (Table/Fig 5) shows the numerical data in the graph for ALP activity.

Cell adhesion: Initial light microscopy investigation of odontoblasts showed a stellate shaped homogeneous fibroblast-like appearance and long cytoplasmic processes as shown in (Table/Fig 6). The cells formed colonies indicating that they were adherent to each other. The cells were stained with crystal violet to check for cell adhesion as shown in (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9)a-d at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours for MTA Plus, Chitosan, MTA plus Chitosan Conjugate, and the control group, respectively.

This shows the affinity of cells towards the material surfaces indicating their anchorage to the biomaterials. The cells showed no signs of cell death or infection.

Cell proliferation: Cell viability was calculated as the number of viable cells in lacs/mL at different time intervals as shown in (Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13) for Group A, B, C, and D, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

In the present study, there were three paired groups, hence the Friedman test was appropriate to use within the groups. In order to evaluate if there were any changes in the proliferation of viable cells at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours among different materials, the Wilcoxon’s Signed-rank Test was used. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05.

Cell death: The number of dead cells was counted manually for all three groups. For Group-A, cell death was reported to be 20%, 13%, and 0.09% after 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. For Group-B, cell death was reported to be 15%, 10%, and 0.05% after 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. For Group-C, cell death was reported to be 0%, 0%, and 10% after 24, 48, and 72 hours. The cells showed very less signs of apoptosis around the biomaterials compared to their proliferation rate, indicating their cytocompatibility with them.

Discussion

In response to a biomimetic material at the dentin-pulp interface, DPSCs form new odontoblasts which differentiate at the site of injury to synthesise an atubular reparative dentin. Thus, a cascade of events is induced by various growth factors that involve migration, proliferation, and differentiation of these dental pulp stem cells (21).

The present study used two materials: MTA Plus and Chitosan. Chitosan was used as a vehicle with the hypothesis of surface modification of the calcium silicate cement (MTA Plus) (8). The basic idea behind this concept was to extract the biomimetic properties of MTA Plus and Chitosan. The scaffold formed by the chitosan will enmesh the calcium hydroxyl ions released by the MTA and thus prolong the release of these ions into the dentin matrix (22). Moreover, a hydrogel form of chitosan is used since it is easier to mix the MTA powder with it.

In present study, the hDPSCs after differentiation revealed a spindle-shaped morphology with a characteristic nucleus situated at the basal third of the body, similar to another study (23). This differentiation was confirmed using the ALP assay. ALP is also one of the markers of the differentiation of DPSCs and plays an important role in the formation of calcified tissue and extracellular matrix (24). The results of this assay showed increased ALP activity after seven days as shown in (Table/Fig 5). This confirmed that the differentiated cells were odontoblasts.

Cell adherence was evaluated by conducting a wash assay using crystal violet. Adhesion assays measure the contacts between a cell and extracellular adhesion proteins (25). During the assay, dead detached cells are washed away. The remaining attached live cells are stained with crystal violet. The amount of crystal violet staining in the assay is directly proportional to the cell biomass that is attached to the plate. Crystal violet staining is a quick and versatile assay for screening cell viability under diverse stimulation conditions (26). In present study, cells have shown a spreading type of morphology around the biomaterials, indicating that they are well adhered to each other as well as the material. The morphology seen under the light microscope showed a spindle shape with cytoplasmic processes extending onto the material surfaces (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9). There was a minimal amount of cell death around the materials, thus indicating that all the materials allow cell proliferation. Similar studies were performed by Zhu L et al., and Abou ElReash A et al., where the hDPSCs showed a similar type of cell morphology after differentiation (27),(28).

Cell proliferation was evaluated by the dye exclusion test using Trypan blue. It is one of the gold standard methods of cell counting since it is versatile, cost-effective, and accurate when used for small cell populations (29). Trypan blue is used to count dead cells; the dye is excluded from cells with intact membranes, so only dead cells are stained blue. The present study showed an increase in cell proliferation after 24, 48, and 72 hours among MTA Plus, MTA Plus-Chitosan conjugate, Chitosan Gel, and Control groups (Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13). Statistics displayed a statistically significant increase in cell proliferation from 24 hours to 72 hours (p=0.042) and 48 hours to 72 hours (p=0.042) but no statistically significant difference from 24 hours to 48 hours (p=0.08) in MTA Plus (Group-A). The increase in viable cells in the MTA Plus group was continuous without any decline as shown in (Table/Fig 10). After 72 hours, the MTA Plus group showed a higher rate of cell proliferation when compared to other groups. A study by Tamaki showed that hDPSC proliferation on calcium silicate cements increased after day 6 (30). A similar study showed an increase in cell proliferation with MTA Plus after day 3 (31).

Similarly, MTA Plus-Chitosan conjugate and Chitosan Gel groups displayed a statistically significant increase in cell proliferation from 24 hours to 72 hours (p=0.042) and 48 hours to 72 hours (p=0.039). Both groups showed a higher proliferation rate at 48 hours.

This can be explained based on the fact that chitosan decreased inflammatory mediators and increased cell proliferation of pulpal cells, as shown in a study conducted by Renard E et al., (32). Percot A et al., stated that chitosan is mainly composed of amino acids such as aspartic and glutamic acids, lysine, and histidine, which are responsible for the biocompatibility of chitosan (33). Also, external mechanical forces can be transmitted across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton via adhesion molecules like integrin, that can influence cell proliferation on its surface (34). MTA Plus, being a calcium silicate cement, induces various growth signalling pathways like Extracellular signal-regulated Kinases (ERKs), Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) etc., which are responsible for cell proliferation (35). When mixed with chitosan, the latter acts as a high-strength scaffold that supports hDPSCs’ attachment and proliferation. In a study conducted by Moreau JL and Xu HH after day 1, the stem cells were able to adhere and spread on the chitosan scaffold, thus forming cell-cell junctions. After 14 days, their stem cells had greatly proliferated (36).

There is no statistically significant difference in the number of proliferating cells for Group B and C after 48 hours compared to Group A and D. This can be explained based on studies conducted by Mao JS et al., and Hamilton V et al., who showed that chitosan did not show significant fibroblast cell growth on its surface. Chitosan has a high surface energy, so even though it shows high cell adhesion, the cells began to degrade the surface of chitosan, which inhibits further cell migration and proliferation on its surface (34),(37).

This study concluded that the basic function of chitosan is to act as a vehicle onto which the cultured cells can adhere and proliferate when they come in contact with a biomimetic material like MTA Plus. The scaffold will support the growth factors induced by the MTA Plus. The hydrogel form used in this case will preserve the viability of incorporated cells. Also, the interconnected porous structure will favor nutrient and oxygen diffusion required for cell proliferation (38). However, cell proliferation will decrease eventually over a period of time.

Within the limitations of the study, it was noted that the novel, non toxic, biodegradable natural polymer, Chitosan, increased cell adhesion and proliferation when used with MTA Plus. Chitosan, when conjugated with MTA Plus, also increased the apatite forming ability of the calcium silicate cement. Further studies need to be conducted to evaluate other properties of Chitosan alone as well as in conjunction with other novel materials.

Limitation(s)

No confirmatory studies were done for the differentiation of odontoblasts (gene profiling), adhesion (flow cytometry, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) studies), and proliferation of cells (Optical Density). Only cell adhesion and proliferation were evaluated in the present study, so further studies should be done to evaluate the other properties of these biomimetic pulp capping materials on pulp stem cells that are of clinical importance.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that MTA Plus, MTA Plus-chitosan conjugate, and Chitosan gel showed cell adhesion at 24, 48, and 72 hours. MTA Plus-chitosan conjugate (Group B) showed an increase in cell proliferation after 24, 48 hours, and 72 hours. MTA Plus (Group A) showed an increase in cell proliferation from 24 to 72 hours. Chitosan gel (Group C) showed a significant increase in cell proliferation after 48 hours. All three groups, MTA Plus, MTA Plus-chitosan conjugate, and chitosan gel, showed a significant amount of cell proliferation, indicating that they were less toxic to cells. Thus, present research provides valuable insights into the biocompatibility and potential regenerative effects of various root end filling materials in dental procedures. Particularly, Chitosan can be used as a vehicle with MTA since their conjugate showed greater proliferation activity after stem cell culture.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Institute for their support in conducting the study.

References

1.
Volponi AA, Pang Y, Sharpe PT. Stem cell-based biological tooth repair and regeneration. Trends in Cell Biology. 2010;20(12):715-22. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S. Postnatal human Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97(25):13625-30. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Khalili AA, Ahmad MR. A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(8):18149-84. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Ersahan S, Oktay EA, Sabuncuoglu FA, Karaoglanoglu S, Aydin N, Suloglu AK. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of contemporary glass-ionomer cements on mouse fibroblasts and human dental pulp cells. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2020;21(3):321-28. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
An S. The emerging role of extracellular Ca2+ in osteo/odontogenic differentiation and the involvement of intracellular Ca 2+ signaling: From osteoblastic cells to dental pulp cells and odontoblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(3):2169-93. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Al-Hezaimi K, Salameh Z, Al-Fouzan K, Al Rejaie M, Tay FR. Histomorphometric and micro-computed tomography analysis of pulpal response to three different pulp capping materials. J Endod. 2011;37(4):507-12. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Chacko DV, Kurikose DS. Human pulpal response to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): A histologic study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2006;30(3):203-09. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Tu MG, Ho CC, Hsu TT, Huang TH, Lin MJ, Shie MY. Mineral trioxide aggregate with mussel-inspired surface nanolayers for stimulating odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp cells. J Endod. 2018;44(6):963-70. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Moussaoui Y, Mnasri N, Elaloui E, Salem RB, Lagerge S, De Menorval LC. Preparation of chitosan gel. In: EPJ Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences; 2012;29;00034. [crossref]
10.
Ahmadi F, Oveisi Z, Samani SM, Amoozgar Z. Chitosan based hydrogels: Characteristics and pharmaceutical applications. Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015;10(1):01-16.
11.
Sandford PA, Zikakis JP, Brine CJ. Advances in chitin and chitosan. Elsevier Applied Science; 1992.
12.
Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Lwanga SK. World Health Organization. Adequacy of sample size in health studies. Chichester: Wiley; 1990.
13.
Vaux DL, Fidler F, Cumming G. Replicates and repeats- what is the difference and is it significant? A brief discussion of statistics and experimental design. EMBO reports. 2012;13(4):291-96. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Robasky K, Lewis NE, Church GM. The role of replicates for error mitigation in next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(1):56-62. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Belfield A, Goldberg DM. Revised assay for serum phenyl phosphatase activity using 4-amino-antipyrine. Enzyme. 1971;12(5):561-73. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kind PR, King E. Estimation of plasma phosphatase by determination of hydrolysed phenol with amino-antipyrine. J Clin Pathol. 1954;7(4):322. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Hansen PW. A simplification of Kind and King’s method for determination of serum phosphatase. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1966;18(3):353-56. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Piccinini F, Tesei A, Arienti C, Bevilacqua A. Cell counting and viability assessment of 2D and 3D cell cultures: Expected reliability of the trypan blue assay. Biol Proced Online. 2017;19:01-02. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Spector DL, Goldman RD, Leinwand LA. Cells: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1998.
20.
Feoktistova M, Geserick P, Leverkus M. Crystal violet assay for determining viability of cultured cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016;2016(4):343-46. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Ricucci D, Loghin S, Lin LM, Spångberg LS, Tay FR. Is hard tissue formation in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts a regenerative or a reparative process? J Dent. 2014;42(9):1156-70. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Hashmi A, Zhang X, Kishen A. Impact of Dentin Substrate Modification with Chitosan-Hydroxyapatite Precursor Nanocomplexes on Sealer Penetration and Tensile Strength. J Endod. 2019;45(7):935-42. Doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 May 9. PMID: 31078326. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Hao J, Narayanan K, Ramachandran A, He G, Almushayt A, Evans C, et al. Odontoblast cells immortalized by telomerase produce mineralized dentin-like tissue both in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2002;277(22):19976-81. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Liu Q, Cen L, Yin S, Chen L, Liu G, Chang J, et al. A comparative study of proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells on akermanite and β-TCP ceramics. Biomaterials. 2008;29(36):4792-99. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Chiba K, Kawakami K, Tohyama K. Simultaneous evaluation of cell viability by neutral red, MTT and crystal violet staining assays of the same cells. Toxicology In vitro. 1998;12(3):251-58. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Ishiyama M, Tominaga H, Shiga M, Sasamoto K, Ohkura Y, Ueno K. A combined assay of cell vability and in vitro cytotoxicity with a highly water-soluble tetrazolium salt, neutral red and crystal violet. Biol Pharm Bull. 1996;19(11):1518-20. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Zhu L, Yang J, Zhang J, Peng B. A comparative study of BioAggregate and ProRoot MTA on adhesion, migration, and attachment of human dental pulp cells. J Endod. 2014;40(8):1118-23. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Abou ElReash A, Hamama H, Grawish M, Saeed M, Zaen El-Din AM, Shahin MA, et al. A laboratory study to test the responses of human dental pulp stem cells to extracts from three dental pulp capping biomaterials. Int Endod J. 2021;54(7):1118-28. Doi: 10.1111/iej.13495. Epub 2021 Mar 7. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Strober W. Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Current protocols in Immunology 1997;21(1):111:A3.B.1-A3.B.3. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Hayashi Y, Kawaki H, Hori M, Shintani K, Hasegawa T, Tanaka M, et al. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of gypsum-containing calcium silicate cements. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(4):863-69. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Rodrigues EM, Gomes-Cornélio AL, Soares-Costa A, Salles LP, Velayutham M, Rossa-Junior C, et al. An assessment of the overexpression of BMP-2 in transfected human osteoblast cells stimulated by mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Int Endod J. 2017;50:e9-e18. [crossref]
32.
Renard E, Amiaud J, Delbos L, Charrier C, Montembault A, Ducret M, et al. Dental pulp inflammatory/immune response to a chitosan-enriched fibrin hydrogel in the pulpotomised rat incisor. Eur Cells Mater. 2020;40:74-87. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Percot A, Viton C, Domard A. Characterization of shrimp shell deproteinization. Biomacromolecules. 2003;4(5):1380-85. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Mao JS, Cui YL, Wang XH, Sun Y, Yin YJ, Zhao HM, et al. A preliminary study on chitosan and gelatin polyelectrolyte complex cytocompatibility by cell cycle and apoptosis analysis. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):3973-81. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Sanz JL, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Lopez-Gines C, Monleon D, Llena C, Forner L. Dental stem cell signaling pathway activation in response to hydraulic calcium silicate-based endodontic cements: A systematic review of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2021;37(4):e256-68. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Moreau JL, Xu HH. Mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation on an injectable calcium phosphate-chitosan composite scaffold. Biomaterials. 2009;30(14):2675-82.[crossref][PubMed]
37.
Hamilton V, Yuan Y, Rigney DA, Puckett AD, Ong JL, Yang Y, et al. Characterization of chitosan films and effects on fibroblast cell attachment and proliferation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2006;17(12):1373-81. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Busilacchi A, Gigante A, Mattioli-Belmonte M, Manzotti S, Muzzarelli RA. Chitosan stabilizes platelet growth factors and modulates stem cell differentiation toward tissue regeneration. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013;98(1):665-76.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69077.19458

Date of Submission: Dec 15, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 07, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Apr 05, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 16, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 22, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Apr 01, 2024 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com