Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 56156

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : August | Volume : 5 | Issue : 4 | Page : 801 - 803 Full Version

Cardiovascular Autonomic Function in Microalbuminuria


Published: August 1, 2011 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1425
Sudhanva .S, Dhananjaya.J.R, Yathish.T.R, Mamatha.C.N

Department of Physiology, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan-573201, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sudhanva S.
Assistant Professor, Department of physiology
Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences
Hassan-573201, Karnataka, India
Mobile: +91-9480202815; E-mail: sudhanvadr@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Microalbuminuria (MA) has emerged as a risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular diseases and retinopathy which is independent of blood pressure.

Aim: The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between cardiovascular autonomic function and microalbuminuria.

Methods: The study comprised of 200 male subjects of age group >50 years, who were classified into 2 groups of 100 subjects each. 1) Subjects with MA and 2) Age matched healthy controls without MA. The tests which were performed were 1) Heart rate response to deep breathing, Valsalva maneuover and standing. 2) Blood pressure response to standing and to asustained handgrip. Individual tests were given a score of 0, 1, or 2 and an overall autonomic test score of 0-10 was obtained.

Results: The mean autonomic score in the controls and in subjects with MA were 5.73 ± 1.26 and 7.00 ± 1.80 respectively. The coefficient of variation (CV%) of the controls and the subjects with MA was 21.9 and 25.7 respectively. A significant difference in the autonomic score was observed in the subjects with MA (p<0.01) as compared to the controls.

Conclusion: The impairment of the autonomic function leads to an increased renal blood flow, glomerular hyperfiltration, and sodium excretion, which accelerates its progression to microalbuminuria. In conclusion, individuals with microalbuminuria should be diagnosed early to minimize cardiovascular complications.

Keywords

Cardiovascular autonomic function, Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular tests

Quantitative cardiovascular autonomic function tests are widely used to detect, verify and quantify the cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction. They have been tested for their validity and reliability. These tests are performed since their procedures are straightforward, reproducible and non-invasive.

Microalbuminuria, which is defined as the elevation of urinary albumin excretion in the range of 30 to 300 mg/24 h or 20-200 μg/min, is strongly associated with endothelial dysfunction, which increases the risk of nephropathy and cardiovascular complications, including atherosclerotic coronary disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease and cardiovascular mortality. Earlier studies have suggested that patients with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy had a higher prevalence of microalbuminuria than patients without cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy. So, the present study was aimed at evaluating the association of cardiovascular autonomic functions, as assessed by quantitative cardiovascular autonomic function tests with microalbuminuria in the age group above 50 years.

Material and Methods

This observational study was conducted in the Institute of Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India during March 2006 to March 2007. The study was conducted after obtaining informed consent from the study participants, and after taking clearance from the ethical committee of the institution. The study comprised of 200 male subjects of age group >50 years. The presence of microalbuminuria was detected by a colourimetric end point test by using the pyrogallol red reagent. Clean, mid-stream “spot” urine was collected, as this was convenient for the patientthan collecting a 24-hour urine specimen. None of the subjects were suffering from any acute and chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. None were on drugs which altered the renal function and the autonomic functions. They were classified into 2 groups of 100 subjects each. 1. Subjects with microalbuminuria. 2. Control group consisting of age matched healthy subjects without microalbuminuria.

The subjects were instructed not to consume coffee, tea or cola, 12 hours before the tests and were asked to have a light breakfast two hours before the tests. The subjects were asked to relax in the supine position for 30 minutes. The resting heart rate was recorded on a standard electrocardiograph (ECG) from lead II. The blood pressure (BP) was measured by using a sphygmomanometer. The cardiovascular tests which were performed are explained in detail below in their order of execution. These tests were demonstrated to the subjects.

Procedure of Autonomic Eval uation (2)
1. D eep Breathing Test: In the sitting position, the subject was asked to breathe quietly and deeply at the rate of 6 breaths per minute. A continuous ECG was recorded for six cycles. The maximum and minimum R-R intervals in lead II were measured during each breathing cycle and were converted to beats per minute. The result was then expressed as the mean of the difference between the maximum and the minimum heart rate for six measured cycles in beats/minute (1).

Deep Breathing Difference (DBD) = Mean of heart rate differences in 6 breath cycles.

2. H eart-Rate Variation to Valsalva Maneouver: The subject was seated comfortably and was asked to blow into a mouthpiece which was connected to a mercury sphygmomanometer, holding it at a pressure of 40 mm Hg for 15 seconds, while a continuous ECG in lead II was being recorded. The ECG was continued to be recorded for 30 seconds after the release of the pressure at the end of 15 seconds. The heart rate changes which were induced by the Valsalva maneouver were expressed as the ratio of the maximal tachycardia during the maneouver to the maximal bradycardia after the maneouver. This ratio was defined as the Valsalva ratio and was calculated as the ratio of the maximum R-R interval after the maneouver to the minimum R-R interval during the maneouver (1).

Valsalva Ratio (VR) = Maximal tachycardia/maximal bradycardia = Maximum R-R interval/minimum R-R interval.

3. Heart Rate Response to Standing (Postural Tachycardia Index): The subjects were asked to lie on the examination table quietly while the heart rate was being recorded on the ECG. They were then asked to stand-up unaided and the ECG was recorded for 1 minute. The shortest R-R interval at or around the 15th beat and the longest R-R interval at or around the 30th beat were measured (1). The result was expressed as PTI = Longest R-R interval at the 30th beat/shortest R-R interval at the 15th beat.

4. Blood Pressure Response to Standing (Orthostatic Test): The subject was asked to rest in a supine position. The resting BP was recorded by using a sphygmomanometer. The subject was then asked to stand unaided and to remain standing unsupported for 3 minutes. The BP was recorded at 30 seconds and 3 minutes after standing up. The difference between the resting and the standing BP levels was calculated. The fall in systolic BP at 30 seconds on standing was noted (1).

5. Blood Pressure Response to Sustained Handgrip: The patient was asked to compress the inflated blood pressure cuff to the maximum possible extent with one hand and the reading on the manometer was noted. The patient was asked to maintain the pressure of the cuff in such a way as to keep the manometer reading at 30% of the maximum force for a period of 3 minutes. The maximum reading of the diastolic blood pressure was recorded during the procedure. Then, the rise in the diastolic blood pressure was calculated by subtracting the resting diastolic blood pressure from this value.

The interpretation of these tests was done according to the norm which was adopted by Ewing et al (1980) (2).

Results

The results which were obtained by performing the individual cardiovascular tests were given a score of 0, 1, or 2 depending on whether they were normal, borderline or abnormal respectively. An overall autonomic test score of 0-10 could then be obtained. Thedata which was so obtained was entered into a suitable master chart and was treated statistically.

Autonomic Score: The mean and SD of the autonomic score in the controls and in the subjects with MA were 5.73 ± 1.26 and 7.00 ± 1.80 respectively. The CV (%) of the controls and the subjects with MA was 21.9 and 25.7 respectively. There was a significant increase in the autonomic scores in the subjects with MA as compared to that of the controls. The autonomic scores of the subjects were significantly different from that of the controls (p<0.01).

Discussion

The observation of urinary protein as a sign of renal disease is one of the oldest examples in medical history, where individual measures are used as diagnostic markers. Until the 18th century, the uroscopist used his eyes, nose and sometimes taste to come to a diagnostic conclusion (3). Renal function, glomerular filtration and tubular reabsorption and secretion have been described as the major mechanisms for urine formation, which can be used as a diagnostic mirror of pathological changes (3). Microalbuminuria is associated with adverse health outcomes in adults (4).

Microalbuminuria is thought to be a consequence of an increased albumin leakage through the glomerular capillary wall as a result of increased permeability, an increased intraglomerular pressure or both. Recent evidence has pointed towards a more important and direct role of the endothelium in determining its permeability to albumin. In particular, the glycocalyx that fills the endothelial fenestrae, seems to be important for glomerular size and charge selectivity (5), (6). Abnormalities in the endothelial glycocalyx may contribute to microalbuminuria but may also have been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thus providing a potential direct link between albuminuria and cardiovascular disease (7).

Microalbuminuria may precede the onset of non-insulin-dependent diabetes and is linked to aberrations in glucose and insulin metabolism even in the absence of diabetes. These research findings suggest that microalbuminuria may be an important risk marker in the general adult population (8).

The autonomic nervous system modulates the electrical and contractile activity of the myocardium via the interplay between the sympathetic and the parasympathetic activity (9). An imbalance of autonomic control is implicated in the pathophysiology of arrhythmogenesis (9). CAN results from damage to the autonomic nerve fibers of the heart, and the earliest indicator of CAN is a decrease in heart rate variation (HRV) during deep breathing. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy causes abnormalities in the heart rate control, as well as defects in the central and peripheral vascular dynamics. The clinical manifestations of CAN include exercise intolerance, intraoperative cardiovascular lability, orthostatic hypotension (OH), asymptomatic ischaemia, painless myocardial infarction (MI) and an increased risk of mortality (10). Dysfunction of the vascular endothelium causes both microalbuminuria andcardiovascular disease (11). The endothelium is an important site of control of the vascular functions (12). Endothelial dysfunction can be defined as any change in the endothelial properties that is inappropriate with regards to the preservation of organ function. Therefore, many types of endothelial dysfunction exist, depending on which function is affected (e.g., the regulation of haemostasis and fibrinolysis, vasomotor activity, permeability to macromolecules, leukocyte adhesion and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation) (11). The basement membrane synthesis may be altered, which can contribute to arterial stiffening and increased microvascular permeability the vascular tone and permeability may increase (13).

The findings of the present study were in conformity with those of earlier studies which were done by many researchers that are discussed below.

In 2004, Moran A et al performed the cardiovascular autonomic tests (valsalva maneouver, the deep breathing test and the orthostatic test) on 132 patients with a mean age of 70 ± 5.6 years. The urine microalbumin-to-creatinine ratio was calculated. The blood pressure was measured at rest and by a 24-h ambulatory recording. They found that the urine microalbumin-to-creatinine ratio was higher in those with lower HRV. The resting and ambulatory blood pressure levels were negatively correlated with HRV and they were positively correlated with the urine microalbumin-to-creatinine ratio. They concluded that cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and blood pressure were independently associated with microalbuminuria in older patients with type 2 diabetes (14).

In 1992, Klausen K et al, in the Third Copenhagen City Heart Study (1992 to 1994), on 2762 men and women who were 30 to 70 years of age, did a detailed cardiovascular investigation program, including a timed overnight urine sample. The participants were then followed up prospectively by using registers until 1999, with respect to coronary heart disease and until 2001 with respect to death. Urinary albumin excretion above the upper quartile, ie, 4.8 μg/min was associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease and death, independent of age, sex, renal creatinine clearance, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and plasma lipids. They concluded that microalbuminuria was a strong and independent determinant of coronary heart disease and death (15).

Conclusion

It was evident from the present study that significant cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy was present in subjects with microalbuminuria which has emerged as an important risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral vascular diseases and retinopathy which was independent of blood pressure. Hence, this study re-emphasizes the need for estimating the microalbuminuria levels for screening patients at early stages of cardiovascular diseases, in order to initiate steps to minimize disease progression as well as to prevent the complications that could arise at a later stage.

References

1.
Piha SJ. Cardiovascular autonomic function tests. Responses in healthy subjects and determination of age related reference value. Rehab Res Centre 1988; 1 -148.
2.
Ewing DJ, Hume L, Campbell IW, Murray A, Neilson JM, Clarke BF. Autonomic mechanisms in the initial heart rate response to standing. J Appl Physiol 1980; 49: 809-814.
3.
Guder WG, Ivandic M, Hofmann W. Physiopathology of proteinuria and laboratory diagnostic strategy based on single protein analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36:935-939.
4.
Ward KM. Renal function (microalbuminuria). Anal. Chem 1995; 67:383-391.
5.
Haraldsson B, Sorensson J. Why do we not all have proteinuria? An update of our current understanding of the glomerular barrier. News Physiol Sci 2004; 19:7-10.
6.
Deen WM. What determines glomerular permeability? J Clin Invest 2004; 114:1412-1414.
7.
Nieuwdorp M, Meuwese MC, Vink H, Hoekstra JB, Kastelein JJP, Stroes ES. The endothelial glycocalyx: A potential barrier between health and vascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 2005; 16: 507–511.
8.
Dakshinamurty KV, Malati T, Rao PV, Gangadhar T. Microalbuminuria in renal diseases. Trends Clin Biochem. Lab Med 2003:256 -265.
9.
Sztajzel J. Heart rate variability: a noninvasive electrocardiographic method to measure the autonomic nervous system. Swiss Med Wkly 2004; 134:514–522.
10.
Vinik AI, Maser RE, Mitchell BD, Freeman R. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 2003; 26:1553–1579.
11.
Stehouwer CDA, Smulders YM. Microalbuminuria and risk for cardiovascular disease: Analysis of potential mechanisms. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:2106-2111.
12.
Caterina DR. Endothelial dysfunctions: common denominators in vascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 2000; 11:9-23.
13.
Stehouwer CA. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetic nephropathy: state of the art and potential significance for non-diabetic renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19:778-781.
14.
Moran A, Palmas W, Field L. et al. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy is associated with microalbuminuria in older patients with type 2 diabetes. The American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:972-977.
15.
Klausen K, Johnsen KB, Rasmussen F et al. Very low levels of microalbuminuria are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease and death independent of renal function, hypertension, and diabetes. Am Heart Association 2004; 110:32-35.

DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1425

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com