Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 5807

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : April | Volume : 6 | Issue : 2 | Page : 173 - 175 Full Version

Variation in the Pulmonary Functions with the Phases of the Menstrual Cycle in Adolescent Females


Published: April 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2006
Nandhini R., Subhashini A.S.

1. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India. 2. Professor, Department of Physiology, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India. NAME OF DEPARTMENT(S)/INSTITUTION(S) TO WHICH THE WORK IS ATTRIBUTED: Department of Physiology,Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
R. Nandhini,
T2,Sindur Palace,
10 Thirumurthy street,
T. Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 017, India.

Abstract

Background: The dynamic changes in the level of various hormones during different phases of the menstrual cycle are known to affect various functions of the body, apart from the reproductive system. This study was intended to demonstrate the variation in the pulmonary functions during different (menstrual, luteal and follicular) phases of the menstrual cycle in adolescent girls.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational study which was performed at a referral centre in India. Regularly menstruating adolescent girls who presented to the outpatients department for minor, non-respiratory ailments were included in the study. Their lung volumes were measured serially during various phases of the menstrual cycle. During the menstrual phases, various parameters were compared.

Results: Over the study period, 200 girls were enrolled in the study; the complete details for the final assessment were available from 43 girls (age range- 12 -18 years, mean height- 154.1 cm and mean weight -54.5 kg). The forced vital capacity, the forced expiratory volume, the FEV1/FVC ratio and the forced expiratory flow 25% to 50% were noticed to be significantly higher during the luteal phase and the lowest during the menstrual phase.

Conclusions: The pulmonary functions which were quantified as lung volumes and peak flow rates were better during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, thus suggesting a possible beneficial role of progesterone in the management of respiratory illnesses.

Keywords

Menstrual phase, Lung functions, Progesterone

Introduction
The hormones which are released by the ovary bring out physiological changes in the brain, in the musculoskeletal system and in the cardiovascular and pulmonary functions, in addition to changes in the reproductive system. The variation in the pulmonary functions during different phases of the menstrual cycle follows a cyclical pattern, which possibly could be due to the action of various hormones (1),(2). Ovulation is followed by the formation of a corpus luteum, which secretes progesterone. It may have some beneficial effect on the physical performance as well as on VO2 max (3). The information on the variability of the pulmonary functions which are relative to the menstrual phases is insufficient. This study intended to demonstrate the variation in the pulmonary functions during different (menstrual, luteal and follicular) phases of the menstrual cycle in adolescent girls.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was performed between March 2002 and December 2003 at a referral centre in India. Regularly menstruating adolescent girls who presented to the out patients department for minor non- respiratory ailments were included in the study after taking their written informed consent. Those with a history of chronic pulmonary illnesses or long term relevant medication use (bronchodilators, antitubercular drugs, etc) were excluded from the study. A detailed questionnaire was used to assess the pattern of the menstrual cycle, the premenstrual disturbances and the last menstrual period and to rule out allergic respiratory diseases and obesity. The anthropometric measurements and the vital O riginal Articleparameters were recorded. The preliminary clinical examination of the respiratory system was carried out. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs), viz. forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume (FEV1), the FEV1/FVC ratio and the forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25% were studied by using RMS Medspiror (Nagpur, India) and standard laboratory methods, during different phases of the menstrual cycle with the girls in a sitting posture. The PFTs were performed after 30 minutes of non-ambulation and before having lunch, between 1 PM and 1.30 PM everyday, for 30 days continuously, starting from the first day of their menstrual phase. For each subject, the procedure was repeated thrice and the maximum value was considered for the study. The respective phases of menstruation were calculated from the day of the last menstrual period and during the usual duration of the menstrual cycle.

The data was entered in Microsoft Excel sheets and analyzed by using SPSS version 8.0. The continuous variables were compared by using ANOVA among the groups and a ‘p’ value of < 0.05 was considered as significant. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our institute.

Results

Over the study period, 200 girls were enrolled for the study. The complete details for the final assessment were available from 43 girls (age range- 12-18 years, mean height -154.1 cm and mean weight- 54.5 kg). The pulmonary function measures in the cohort over the phases of the menstrual cycle are shown in (Table/Fig 1). The mean of the FVC was more during the luteal phase and it was statistically significant. The mean of the FEV1 was more during theluteal phase as compared to that in the follicular and the menstrual phases and it was statistically significant. FEV1/FVC% and FEF25% were more in the luteal phase as compared to those in the follicular and the menstrual phases and this was statistically significant. The comparison between FVC and FEV1 during various phases of the menstrual cycle is shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Discussion

The present study demonstrated better pulmonary functions which were measured as the lung volumes and the peak flow during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle as compared to those in the follicular and menstrual phases in the regularly menstruating adolescent girls. Though statistically significant differences were demonstrated in our study, our results need to be interpreted in the background of certain limitations. An adequately powered study design which uses the objective measurements of the hormonal levels and the detailed pulmonary functions including diffusion studies, are expected to provide a better insight to the suggested relationship. Our study is on par with a study which was conducted by Beynon et al (1). He reported that the administration of high doses of progesterone throughout the menstrual cycle prevented the deterioration of the premenstrual exacerbation of asthma. The withdrawal of progesterone, therefore, is expected to cause lower flow rates during the premenstrual and the menstrual phases. A study174which was done by Das et al showed that the use of progesterone in the hypoventilation syndrome, obesity and emphysema has been by its virtue of increasing the sensitivity of the respiratory neurons to CO2, producing a stimulatory effect directly on the medullary receptors, thus indicating the role of progesterone on the pulmonary function (4).

According to Brenner et al, both the pre-ovulatory and the premenstrual phases are the actual triggers of the exacerbation of asthma in some women, or maybe these two phases serve as “co-factors” that worsen other recognized triggers of acute asthma (5), thus indicating the role of low levels of progesterone during these two phases. This has been emphasized by Rajesh et al, where the pulmonary functions reflect better values in the luteal phase as compared to those in the follicular phase (2), and also by Sundar et al, where a change in the expiratory flow rates during various phases of the menstrual cycle has been demonstrated. The low peak expiratory flow and the forced expiratory flow 25-75% that were observed during the premenstrual and the menstrual phases indicated a higher bronchial tone during these phases, even in normal women. The possible reason for the changes in the bronchial tone could be the fluctuating levels of the sex hormones in the blood (or) of the mediators which circulate in the blood (6). In a study which was conducted by Chen et al, the pulmonary functions were measured and compared in the midfollicular phase and in the midluteal phase in 30 healthy women. They concluded that the inspiratory muscle endurance was higher in the midluteal phase and that it was lower in the midfollicular phase (7). This was in par with the findings of our study. According to Chong et al, the menstrual cycle appeared to have little effect on the peak expiratory flow rate in healthy, non-asthmatic, Asian women (8).

Conclusion

The pulmonary functions were better, which were measured as the lung volumes and the peak flow, during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle as compared to those in the follicular and the menstrual phases in regularly menstruating adolescent girls. This suggests a possible role of the increased levels of progesterone during the luteal phase on the respiratory system.

References

1.
Beynon HL, Garbett ND, Barnes PJ. Severe premenstrual exacerbation of asthma. The effect of intramuscular progesterone. Lancet 1988: 2; 370-72.
2.
Brutsaert TD, Spielvogel H, Caceres E, Araoz M, Chatterton RT, Vitzthum VJ. Effect of the menstrual cycle phase on the exercise performance of high-altitude native women at 3600 m. J Exp Biol. 2002 Jan;205(Pt 2):233-39.
3.
Rajesh CS, Gupta P, Vaney N. The status of the pulmonary function tests in adolescent females of Delhi. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2000 Oct;44(4):442-48.
4.
Das TK, Jana H. Basal oxygen consumption during different phases of the menstrual cycle. Indian J Med Res. 1991 Feb;94:16-9.
5.
Brenner BE, Holmes TM, Mazal B, Camargo CA Jr. Correlation between the phase of the menstrual cycle and the asthma presentations in the emergency department. Thorax. 2005 Oct;60(10):806-9.
6.
Rao GS, Rajan P, Walter S. Expiratory flow rate changes during the menstrual cycle. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1991 Jan;35(1):74-6.
7.
Chen HI, Tang YR. Effects of the menstrual cycle on the respiratory muscle function. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Nov;140(5):1359-62.
8.
Chong E, Ensom MH. Peak expiratory flow rate and premenstrual symptoms in healthy nonasthmatic women. Pharmacotherapy. 2000 Dec;20(12):1409-16.

DOI and Others

DOI: JCDR/2012/3929:2006

Financial OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS:
None.


Date Of Submission: Jan 06, 2012
Date Of Peer Review: Jan 20, 2012
Date Of Acceptance: Feb 18, 2012
Date Of Publishing: Apr 15, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com