Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 52984

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2012 | Month : August | Volume : 6 | Issue : 6 | Page : 1086 - 1088 Full Version

Congential Midline Cervical Cleft: A Case Report And An Embryological Review


Published: August 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2335
Sangappa S.Doddamani, Prakash S. Handi, Chandrashekharayya S.H., Shashidhar S Suligavi, Sachin S.Chougule

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, S N Medical College, Navanagar, Bagalkot, -587102, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Prakash S Handi, Associate Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, S N Medical College Navanagar Bagalkot -587102 Karnataka-India. E-mail: prakashhandi@yahoo.com

Abstract

Congenital midline cervical cleft (CMCC ) is a rare anterior neck anomaly with controversial theories / hypothesis regarding its embryogenesis. If it is not treated at an early age, it can result in complications like webbing of the neck, dental malocclusion and restricted neck movements.

We are describing here, one such case, who presented at an age of 19 years. The lesion was excised and closure was done by multiple Z- plasty, with satisfactory results. We have discussed the embryological theories / hypothesis with the review of literature.

Keywords

Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft , Z - plasty

Introduction
Congenital midline cervical cleft is a rare midline anterior neck anomaly. Most of the cases which have been reported so far, have been detected and treated at an early age and there are very few cases who have presented at a later age with complications. This defect is common in females, with the ratio of 2:1, according to Eastlack et al (1). The age of presentation ranges from birth to 23 years, (2). There are reports of similar cases by Y Bajaj (3), Saha S (4), Fincher SG (5), A Mlynarek and others. In most of the earlier reports, the authors considered surgery as the only option to cure this condition. Most of the authors have shown a preference for closure by multiple Z - plasty. The embryopathogenesis of the lesion remains unclear and several hypotheses have been proposed .

Case Report

A 19 year old girl presented to the Outpatients Department with a history of a midline neck scar which had been present since birth and restricted neck movements since a few years. She was born after an uncomplicated delivery. On examination, in addition to the scar over the neck, she had micrognathia and dental malocclusion. The rest of the examination revealed nothing significantly abnormal and there was no family history of any congenital midline defects.

On detailed examination , it was found that there was a linear scar in the midline of the neck, which extended vertically be-tween the mandible and the sternal notch (Table/Fig 1). It was covered by atrophic skin and it measured around 7 - 8 cm in length and 4 - 6 mm in width. There was a sinus at the lower end of this lesion. A protuberance of skin was present at the superior aspect of the scar. A cord like structure was palpated underneath the skin lesion, which extended from the mental tubercle to the lower end of the lesion. Ultrasound examination revealed the presence of a cord like structure which extended from the mental tubercle to the manubrium sterni and there was a cleft in the manubrium. The other cervical structures were normal. Under general anaesthesia, an incision was made, which incorporated the whole lesion within the incision margins and the lesion was dissected along with the fibrous band, which had web like strands which were extending and merging into the fasciae of the region (Table/Fig 2). The fibrous band and the lesion were found in the subcutaneous plane mainly and they were anterior to the thyroid gland, with no extensions into the carotids or into the thyroid gland. The carotids and the thyroid were free of the fibrous band and they were normal. Then, the defect was closed by multiple Z - plasty. The post operative results as were observed on follow up at 6 months and 1 year, showed good healing and improved neck movements. (Table/Fig 3) and (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Congenital midline cervical cleft is a rare anomaly , but it may be overlooked or misdiagnosed. Eastlack et al. reported a female to male ratio of 2 : 1. The cases appear to be sporadic as no report has suggested a familial inheritance. The literature has described a spectrum of clinical findings. The most consistently reported features are - • A vertically oriented cleft of reddened tissue
• A protuberance of skin superiorly
• A blind epithelium lined sinus tract caudally
• A fibrous subcutaneous cord
• Mucoid material may be expressed from the orifice of the sinus (6).

The findings are however quite variable, occasionally involving only the midline webbing without the skin lesions. The fibrous cord may limit the neck movements and one or two bony prominences are frequently found at the base of the mandible, which are secondary to the traction of the cord.

These features tend to become more prominent with time, making an early intervention appropriate. Classically, there is some degree of retrognathism and various degrees of clefting of the lip and the mandible. The cleft may extend inferiorly to involve the sternum and superiorly the hyoid bone. The other associated abnormalities may be thyroglossal cysts and ectopic branchiogenic cysts. The less frequently associated features are ectopia cardis and midline haemangiomata (6). Although the embryo pathogenesis of CMCC has not been fully elucidated, most of the authors regard CMCC as a part of a spectrum of branchial arch developmental anomalies. The most commonly accepted theory is impaired mesodermal fusion along the distal branchial arches in the midline (7). An abnormal development of the first branchial arch on day 22 in the human embryo when the branchial arches are forming. The first arch is divided into the maxillary and the mandibular processes, with a horizontal cleft dividing each side in the midline. The mandibular process merges on day 26. A delay in this could result in the ectodermal cells with the underlying mesodermal cells being deposited in the ventral aspect of the neck. These would continue to differentiate and form the skeletal muscle [tongue derivative], the salivary glandular tissue and a mucosal surface, thus resulting in the CMCC defect (8).

Other theories include
[a] Rupture of a pathological adhesion between the epithelium of the cardiohepatic fold and that of the ventral part of the first branchial arch, causing tissue ischaemia again, with localized necrosis and scarring (8).
[b] The mesodermal deficiency theory states that the epithelium over the deficiency may have been intact, but pulled apart later due to the failure of the adequate mesenchymal ingrowth (9).
[c] Failure of the mesenchyme to penetrate the midline, thus causing a deficiency in its intersection with the ectoderm, which would explain the absence of the skin adnexae in the dermis (9)
[d] The pressure of the primitive heart on the branchial arches could generate adhesions and provoke a defect in the fusion between them (2),(10).
[e] Vascular anomalies producing ischaemia and necrosis (11).
Gargan et al. proposed that CMCC occurs in a cluster into two major groups

(1) The midline cervical cleft and 2] Hypoplasia of the mandibular arch. If the migration along the second arch is deficient or delayed, an isolated CMCC results. The more complicated presentations such as inferior gnathoschiasis with a cleft mandible or tongue and the absence of the supporting structures in the neck are due to a deficiency of the first arch (9).

The diagnosis is made easily by simply observing the characteristic clinical findings. The treatment involves complete excision of the cleft and the sinus tract and then, Z - plasty. If needed, orthognathic procedures are undertaken, so as to achieve a correct dental occlusion. If the fibrous cord is not excised, then recurrence is common.5 An early treatment should be considered to reduce the risk of contractures, mandibular exostosis and dental malocclusion.

Congenital midline cervical cleft is a rare congenital anomaly of the neck, with many theories / hypotheses on its embryopathogenesis. The most accepted theory is impaired fusion of the distal branchial arches in the midline. An early diagnosis and surgical excision of the lesion and the underlying fibrous band with multiple Z - plasty closure, is necessary, to prevent the webbing of the neck and mandibular maldevelopment.

References

1.
Eastlack JP, Howard RM, Frieden IJ. Congenital midline cervical cleft : a case report and review of the English language literature. Pediatric Dermatology. 2000;17:118-22.
2.
Mlynarek A, Hagr A, Tewfik TL, Nguyen VH. Congenital midline cervical cleft : a case report and review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhi. 2003;67:1243-49.
3.
Bajaj Y, Dunaway D, Hartley BEJ. A surgical approach for congenital midline cervical cleft. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118:566-69.
4.
Saha S, Misra S, Saha VP, Mondal AR. Midline cervical cleft : A report of two cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;57:78-79.
5.
Fincher SG, Fincher GG. Congenital midline cervical cleft with a subcutaneous fibrous cord. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;101:399-401.
6.
Barth PC, Castillo J, Milman B, Wood E. Congenital midline cervical cleft – a report of three cases. Ear Nose Throat J. 2006 Feb;85(2):119-20, 125.
7.
Cochran SC, Defetta RJ, Brenski AC.Congenital midline cervical cleft: A practical approach to the Z - plasty closure. Int J Pediatr Otorhi. 2006;70:553-559.
8.
Gardner ROE, Moss ALH. The congenital mid line cleft - a case report and review of the literature. Brit J Plast Surg. 2005;58:399-403.
9.
Ercocen AR, Yilmaz S, Aker H. Congenital midline cervical cleft : a case report and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60:580-85.
10.
Derbez R, Nicollas R, Roman S, Esteve A, Triglia JM. Congenital midline cervical cleft of the neck : a series of five cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhi. 2004;68:1215-19.
11.
Kara CO, Kara IG, Turkey D. Congenital midline cervical cleft. Otolaryng Head Neck. 2006 ;135:953-54.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4671:2335

Date of Submission: Jun 22, 2012
Date of Peer Review: Jun 30, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jul 06, 2012
Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012

Financial OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS:
None.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com