Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 168983

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2021 | Month : July | Volume : 15 | Issue : 7 | Page : RC04 - RC07 Full Version

Outcome of Biological Plating of Extra-articular Proximal Tibia Fractures


Published: July 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/48236.15161
Faisal S Mohammed, Akshay Babarao Ingale

1. Professor and Head, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Akshay Babarao Ingale,
Plot No. 34, Pathan Layout, Sambhaji Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: koolakshay22@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The most prominent transformation in the treatment of fractures has been modified from intensive open reduction and internal fixation with absolute stability to the biological fixation with relative stability and secondary healing with callus formation, with priority on preservation of the vascularity of bone and soft tissue to improve fracture healing.

Aim: To evaluate the outcome of biological fixation of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures in adults using the locking compression plate.

Materials and Methods: The present prospective longitudinal study was conducted at Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, which included 30 patients who had extra-articular proximal tibia fractures belonging to AO type 41A2 and 41A3 treated by proximal tibia lateral locking plate 4.5/5.0 mm. The patients were followed-up at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months and one year. The fracture union, coronal, sagittal alignment was assessed radiologically at the end of follow-up. Functionally the outcome was evaluated using lower extremity functional score. Descriptive statistics were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Biological plating with locking compression plate has shown promising results both in terms of function and radiology. There was non-significant difference in lower extremity functional score between patients with malunion and normal alignment. Mean union time was 19.93 weeks with a standard deviation of 2.21 weeks. There was non-significant difference between the range of motion and fracture type (p-value 0.38) as well as that between Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS) and fracture type (p-value 0.0501). On functional evaluation of patients treated with biological plating, there was statistical significance in Knee Range of Motion (ROM) for the patients between malunion and normal alignment (p value 0.01).

Conclusion: The biological fixation using minimally invasive techniques is an effective method of stabilisation for extra-articular proximal tibia fracture, yielding good mechanical alignment and protecting soft tissues and blood supply, leading to higher union rates with good functional outcome.

Keywords

Fixation, Locking plate, Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis

Metaphyseal proximal tibia fractures are common and constitute for 5-11 % of all tibial. Fractures (1). These fractures are cumbersome, demanding and necessary to treat as proximal tibia plays a key role in weight-bearing. Due to high energy trauma involved there is complex, multi-fragmentary comminution, soft tissue injury and neurovascular injury. Though the problems of soft tissue and neurovascular injury were tackled by external fixator, it’s use was largely limited due to complications of non-union, malunion and pin tract infections (2). No agreement on optimal treatment has been reached as each modality has it’s own indication and contraindication. In the era of aggressive internal fixation, infection and implant failure were common due to conventional plating. Though principles of anatomical reduction, rigid fixation was followed, preservation of soft tissue was unknowingly ignored. Following which AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen) principles (1990) modified their principles that included functional reduction, stable fixation, preservation of blood supply and early active mobilisation. In the year 1997, Dr. Christian Krettek and Dr. Harald Tscherne introduced the concept of mini-incision surgery called minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (3).

This involved moving away from aggressive and rigid fixation and approaching towards indirect reduction, relative stability, minimal soft tissue stripping (3),(4). Intramedullary nail, though it was minimally invasive, but inefficient in proximal tibial fractures due to short proximal fragment and thus tendency for malalignment (5). Farouk O et al., in 1999 showed that minimal invasive plating had better conservation of periosteal and medullary perfusion (6).

Locking compression plates revolutionised the world of fracture fixation. These plates and the minimally invasive operation tools are the main workhorses of the Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique. This technique results in biological fracture healing preserving vascularity, fracture haematoma, minimising soft tissue injury, avoiding the need for bone grafting and relative stabilty. Therefore, MIPPO is also referred to as biological plating. Very little data is available in the literature regarding outcomes of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures by biological fixation. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of metaphyseal proximal tibia fracture managed by locking compression plates following the principles of biological fixation.

Material and Methods

A proespective longitudinal observational study was done on 30 patients with proximal tibia fractures belonging to AO classification (1) type AO 41A2 and 41A3 were operated for internal fixation with 4.5 mm/5 mm proximal tibia lateral locking compression plate between August 2018 and September 2020 in Department of Orthopaedics in tertiary health care centre. Approval by the hospital Ethics Committee was sought (IEC-GMCHN/AP/2018/22).

Inclusion criteria: All patients aged 18-65 years, admitted in the study centre during the study time period with Gustillo Anderson grade 1 compound and closed fractures of proximal tibia belonging to AO type 41A2 and 41A3 sustained fracture within two weeks of surgery without neurovascular injury were included in the study after obtaining the written informed consent and preanaesthetic clearance for operative procedure in the study.

Exclusion criteria: All patients with compound fractures of Gustillo Anderson grade 2 and grade 3, pathological fractures, patient aged less than 18 years and more than 65 years and those with severe co-morbidities like psychiatric illness, cardiovascular diseases, cognitive disorders, were excluded from the study.

Sample size constituted: It constituted all patients sufficing the inclusion criteria, hence 30 in number, 19 male patients and 11 female patients. A thorough history and clinical examination was done for each patient. Other associated injuries like head, chest, spine, any other extremity and abdomen were noted. Plain radiographs of the involved limb with adjoining joint were taken in anteroposterior and lateral views.

Study Procedure

The patients were operated in supine position (under general or regional anaesthesia) on a radiolucent table, with a sandbag underneath the ipsilateral hip joint with pneumatic tourniquet over the proximal thigh. Under all aseptic precautions, a curvilinear incision (s-shaped) was made over the proximal tibia on the lateral side. The skin incision was approximately 5-6 cm in length. The fascia of the ilio-tibial band was divided longitudinally parallel to its fibres starting at the gerdy’s tubercle. Dissection was extended distally through the fascia of tibialis anterior muscle. The submuscular tunnel was made with a periosteal elevator. Indirect reduction was achieved with axial traction and/or application of reduction clamps or distractor. To achieve reduction at the fracture site, a reduction clamp percutaneously was applied to correct coronal and sagittal plane alignment. All was confirmed under fluoroscopic guidance (High Frequency 50Khz Microprocessor controlled portable C-arm machine). Internal fixation with a proximal tibia lateral locking compression plate 4.5 mm/5 mm was achieved. Principles of bridging plate fixation were followed (3),(4). Fracture reduction was obtained before the screw placement. Cortical screws flushed the plate to the bone. Locking screws were fixed distally and proximally. A submuscular drain was inserted and closure done in layers.

Passive range of motion exercises of the knee was started on the first postoperative day. All patients were mobilised with toe-touch weight-bearing immediately in the postoperative period and partial weight-bearing with crutches at six weeks. Active and active-assisted range of motion was started once swelling subsided. Quadriceps strengthening exercises were commenced after two weeks. Full weight-bearing was restricted until clinical and radiological signs of the union were evident. The patients were followed-up at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months and one year (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2). Antero-posterior (AP and lateral radiographs were obtained postoperatively and followed-up till the end of one year. In the AP view, varus/valgus deformity was measured by measuring the angle between the lines drawn perpendicular to the proximal and distal tibial articular surfaces. In lateral view, the procurvatum/recurvatum was measured similarly and 8 degrees of the posterior slope was subtracted (7). The measurement of angles was done using Dicom software (Radiant DICOM viewer 4.0.1) (Table/Fig 3). Fracture healing was considered as callus formation in two orthogonal planes. Non-union was defined if three consecutive months’ X-rays did not show progressive healing. Malunion was defined as more than 5 degrees of angulation in the coronal plane, 10 degrees of angulation in the sagittal plane and more than 10 degrees of rotation. Rotation, limb length and range of motion was assessed clinically using a standard goniometer.

Functional outcome was assessed by LEFS with maximum points being 80 and minimum points being 0 points at the end of follow-up (8).

Statistical Analysis

The results were assessed using mean, Standard deviation, Student’s t-test, pearsons correlation coefficient. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The results were entered in MS Excel spreadsheets, and statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0.

Results

Present study comprised of a total of 30 patients. Out of which were 19 were male and 11 were female. The mean age was 42±11.15 years (range 24-65 years).

The most common mode of injury was road traffic accident (23 patients) followed by domestic fall (7 patients). Mean follow-up period was 34 weeks. A total of 17 were AO type 41A2 and 13 were AO type 41A3. Mean surgical delay was 5.4±2.31 days (range 2-8 days). Mean surgical time was 54.56±5.84 minutes. Mean range of motion attained at the end of follow-up was 126.93±4.50 degrees. LEFS at the end of follow-up was 61.86±4.20. Mean union time was 19.93±2.21 weeks (Table/Fig 4).

There was no statistically significant difference between fracture type and range of motion (p=0.38). Also, there was no statistical difference between fracture type and lower extremity functional score (p=0.0501). There was no statistically significant difference between fracture type and union time (p=0.63).

Pearson correlation coefficient for range of motion with advancing age was 0.01 positive weak correlation. Pearson correlation coefficient for LEFS with advancing age was 0.03 negative weak correlation. Malunion in coronal plane was observed in five patients (range from 9 degrees varus to 10 degrees valgus). Malunion in sagittal plane was observed in four patients (range from 15 degrees procurvatum to 12 degrees recurvatum). Malunion in both the planes was observed in three patients (Table/Fig 5).

Rotational malunion was observed in two patients averaging 13 degrees. Shortening was observed in two patients averaging 1 cm and both observed in AO type 41A3 patients (Table/Fig 6).

There was a significant difference in knee range of motion between patients with malunion (p-value=0.01) and normal alignment. There was no significant difference in lower extremity functional score between patients with malunion (p=0.12) and normal alignment (Table/Fig 7).

With regards to the complication, one patient had implant prominence with the removal of implants done after the radiological union was achieved. One patient had a deep infection treated by debridement and culture-sensitive intravenous antibiotics. One patient had superficial infections treated by oral antibiotics. No complication of non-union and heterotopic ossification was seen.

Discussion

Metaphyseal proximal tibial fractures are difficult to treat due to associated complications. Also, considerable data is lacking due to limited number of studies exclusively on extra-articular metaphyseal tibia fractures. The present study highlights the outcome of such fractures radiologically and clinically. Open reduction and internal fixation was common through all these years with very little emphasis on soft-tissue preservation and vascularity. With the advent of minimally invasive operations, vascularity and soft tissue are maintained, thereby improving rates of fracture healing with reduced incidence of infection and non-union anchored by various studies (9),(10),(11). These all constitute features of biological fixation with preservation of biology of bone and stable mechanical fixation. Intramedullary nails though are minimally invasive but had complications of sagittal and coronal malalignment. Proponents of intramedullary nail cited various techniques of fixation which includes a higher entry point multi-directional locking system nail design, use of poller (blocking screws), early mobilisation and weight bearing (12),(13),(14),(15). The indications of external fixator have become limited due to emerging minimal invasive systems and applies only to compound fractures. In the present study, the authors used a lateral locking plate for fixation. Laterally applied plate provides rigid fixation, are biomechanically stable and assists in reduction due to pre-contoured design. With no need of medial buttressing as cited by various studies (16),(17). While some studies believe that a medial buttressing is essential to withstand varus load and a must for comminuted proximal tibia fractures (18). Locking plates provides fixed-angle construct in comminuted fractures and osteoporotic bones, reduces the loss of fixation.

Malalignment caused in proximal tibia fractures are usually due to muscular forces of the patellar tendon resulting in procurvatum deformity and valgus deformity due to pes anserine tendons. These deformities can be easily reduced indirectly with the use of minimally invasive instruments and fluoroscopy (19). Bhandari M et al., in his study observed reduced rates of malunion in locking plate group and higher rates in the intramedullary group (20).

Lindvall E et al., in his comparative study also cited results of malunion associated with nailing group (21). A significant difference in knee range of motion between patients with malunion and normal alignment was observed in this study. We believe that the lateral locking plate is inefficient in cases of severe medial comminution and demands medial fixation as well having buttress effect. Infection was common in the era of open reduction and internal fixation. Biological plating drastically reduced the rates of infection. However, the studies are lacking in the infection rate in closed fractures treated by biological plating. With many studies involving compound fractures, the rate of infection was significantly higher (20).

However, in both the studies, the difference between the groups were not statistically significant. In this study, rate of infection was mere 6.66 per cent with the reason being the exclusion of compound fractures. Phisitkul P et al., reported a 22% rate of infection in patients involving high energy proximal tibia fractures treated by less invasive stabilisation system (11).

Hardware prominence is common in plate fixation due to its high-profile design. This was supplemented by various designs involving the proximal tibia plate (21),(22). The hardware prominence can be reduced by curvilinear skin incision, covering the plate with meticulous ilio-tibial band closure and use of cortical screws in construct to flush the plate to the bone. The removal of locking plates can become difficult due to cold welding of locking screws. Implant prominence is a major problem in the plating group as compared to the interlocking nail group supported by the literature (21),(22),(23). In present study, there was one case of implant prominence.

Non-union is uncommon in proximal tibia unless it is a compound fracture. Due to vascular supply maintained because of biological fixation non-union is avoided (19),(22),(23),(24). In present study, no case of non-union was observed. Knee stiffness is an uncommon complication as fractures are extra-articular. Early rehabilitation avoids such complication. In the present study, no such complication was observed. Polytrauma especially in the same limb trauma may be a predictor in the outcome of proximal tibia fractures.

Limitation(s)

Small sample size, absence of comparative group, inter-observer variation and short-term follow-up for complications were the limitations of this study.

Conclusion

Biological fixation of metaphyseal tibial fractures belonging to AO type 41A2 and 41A3 with locking compression plates has shown promising results. The present study also concluded that this technique reduces Malalignment, infection rates and gives optimum stability, better functional outcome.

References

1.
Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J. The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Jt Surg 250. Br. 110105;77(4):417-22. [crossref]
2.
Tytherleigh Strong GM, Keating JF, Court Brown CM. Extraarticular fractures of the proximal tibial diaphysis: Their epidemiology, management and outcome. J Roy Coll Surg Edin. 110107;43(2):444-49.
3.
Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury. 110107;28(Suppl. 1):A20-40. [crossref]
4.
Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: The scientific basis of biological internal fixation-choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 223;84(8):10104-110. [crossref]
5.
Hansen M, Mehler D, Hessmann MH, Blum J, Rommens PM. Intramedullary stabilisation of extraarticular proximal tibia fractures: A biomechanical comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary implants including a new proximal tibia nail (PTN). J Orthop Trauma. 228;22(10):701-010. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: Does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique? Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 1101010;14(7):401-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Freedman EL, Johnson FE. Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 110105;416:25-44. PMID: 7744777.
8.
Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American orthopaedic rehabilitation research network. Physical 252 Therapy. 1101010;710(4):471-84.
9.
Oh JK, Oh CW, Jeon IH, Kim SJ, Kyung HS, Park IH, et al. Percutaneous plate stabilisation of proximal tibial fractures. J Trauma. 226;520(2):441-47. Doi: 258 10.10107/01.ta.11174744.77447.84. PMID: 173204087.
10.
Weller S. Biological fracture fixation- What is this? Is it another traumatological fashion or an important aspect of operating technique? IGOF News. 110107; Issue 1.
11.
Phisitkul P, McKinley TO, Nepola JV, Marsh JL. Complications of locking plate fixation in complex proximal tibia injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 228;22(2):84-101.
12.
Hiesterman TG, Shafiq BX, Cole PA. Intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia 255 fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;110(11):7100-71. doi: 10.5546/1134746-20111110- 255 116. PMID: 22052846.
13.
Laflamme GY, Heimlich D, Stephen D, Kreder HJ, Whyne CM. Proximal tibial fracture stability with intramedullary nail fixation using oblique interlocking 287 screws. J Orthop Trauma. 225;17(7):4107-502. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Tornetta 4rd P, Collins E. Semiextended position of intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 110107;438:195-820. Doi: 10.10107/114087-1101070710-10220.
15.
Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P, Richter M, Pape HC, Miclau T. The use of Poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1101010;82(7):1074-79.
16.
Peindl RD, Zura RD, Vincent A, Coley ER, Bosse MJ, Sims SH. Unstable proximal extraarticular tibia fractures: A biomechanical evaluation of four methods of fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 225;19(8):550-46.
17.
Lindeque B, Baldini T. Biomechanical comparison of three different lateral tibia locking plates. Orthopedics. 2010;44(1):19-22.
18.
Chen F, Huang X, Ya Y, Ma F, Qian Z, Shi J, et al. Finite element analysis of intramedullary nailing and double locking plate for treating extra-articular proximal tibial fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019;14(1):01-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Collinge C, Sanders R. Perspectives on modern orthopaedics percutaneous plating in the lower extremity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 220;8(4):221-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Bhandari M, Audige L, Ellis T. Operative treatment of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 225;17:5201-105.
21.
Lindvall E, Sanders R, Dipasquale T, Herscovici D, Haidukewych G, Sagi C. Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of extraarticular proximal tibia fractures: comparison of 58 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2210;25(7): 287 495-102.
22.
Cole PA, Zlowodzki M, Kregor PJ. Treatment of proximal tibia fractures using the less invasive stabilisation system: Surgical experience and early clinical results in 77 fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 225;19(8):528-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Boldin C, Fankhauser F, Hofer HP, Szyszkowitz R. Three year results of proximal tibia fractures treated with LISS. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 228;446:222-220. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Schutz M, Kaab MJ, Haas N. Stabilisation of proximal tibia fractures with the LIS-system: Early clinical experience in Berlin. Injury. 225;44(Suppl. 1):A40-46. Doi: 10.10107/01.blo.11314477.58441.a0.

DOI and Others

10.7860/JCDR/2021/48236.15161

Date of Submission: Dec 22, 2020
Date of Peer Review: Mar 27, 2021
Date of Acceptance: May 20, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 20, 2021
• Manual Googling: Mar 23, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jun 03, 2021 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com