Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 68909

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2021 | Month : August | Volume : 15 | Issue : 8 | Page : OC63 - OC66 Full Version

Prevalence and Involvement of Different Valves in Rheumatic Heart Disease- An Observational Echocardiographic Study in a Tertiary Care Centre, Bengaluru, India


Published: August 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/50182.15288
S Lalitha, Vijay Sai, Prajith Pasam, V Bhargavi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of Cardiology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Postgraduate Student, Department of Cardiology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. S Lalitha,
1193, 1st Main, 2nd Block, BEL Layout, Vidyaranyapura,
Bengaluru-560097, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: vibesubbu@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) is a non suppurative sequelae of group A beta haemolytic streptococci, resulting from inadequately treated streptococcal sore throat or scarlet fever and leading to valvular heart disease. Rheumatic heart disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in younger population in developing countries. The present study was done at a tertiary care medical college hospital with the objective of establishing prevalence and involvement of different valve patterns by Echocardiography (ECHO).

Aim: To analyse the valvular pattern of RHD over a period of four years in a tertiary care centre and highlight the importance of ECHO in the definitive diagnosis of RHD, and to know the continuing burden of RHD.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital based retrospective observational study conducted at Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. A total of 518 cases of RHD were selected as a study population among the ECHO performed between January 2016 and January 2020 after an exclusion criterion of degenerative mitral and aortic valve disease, congenital aortic and mitral valve disease, myxomatous mitral valve disease, trivial and functional regurgitation. Analysis of valvular pattern was performed. Data analysis was done by tables, charts, percentages and ratio.

Results: A total of 518 patients were diagnosed to have RHD by 2-Dimensional ECHO. Among them 276 (53%) were females and 242 (47%) were males. The average age was 41.9 years. The most common valve involved independently and in combined lesions was the mitral valve. Of the study population, 446 patients had Mitral Stenosis (MS) and 393 had Mitral Regurgitation (MR). Aortic Stenosis (AS) was found among 111 patients and 304 patients had Aortic Regurgitation (AR). Tricuspid Stenosis (TS) (organic) was found in seven cases. Multiple valves were involved in 204 cases. Among them 104 of the cases had MS, MR and AR, 69 cases had MS, MR, AS and AR, 21 cases had MS, AS and AR, seven cases had MR, AS and AR and three cases had MS, AS, AR and TS. Though aortic valve was involved in multi valvular lesions, significant AR (moderate and severe) was seen in 109 patients and significant AS (moderate and severe) was seen in 67 patients.

Conclusion: RHD continues to be a major burden to population in developing countries. In the present study, various patterns of valvular involvement were noted. Drastic measures are to be taken primary and secondary prevention of RHD.

Keywords

Aortic regurgitation, Aortic stenosis, Echocardiography, Mitral regurgitation, Mitral stenosis

The Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting children and younger population in their formative years. The burden of RHD varies among countries as per the socio-economic status and health care systems (1),(2),(3),(4). Rheumatic fever and RHD have disappeared from wealthy countries, whereas it is still a burning problem in developing countries (5). The burden of RHD has been estimated from population, school and hospital based studies which have their own limitations (no uniformity and standardisation). School health and population surveys are performed clinically and symptom based. ECHO surveys have yielded more diagnosis (>30% of clinical surveys) (6),(7). The prevalence of RHD is varied among urban, rural and different geographic areas based on over-crowding, poor sanitation, under nutrition, poor housing, poverty which can cause rapid spread of group-A beta haemolytic streptococci (8). ICMR study conducted between 2002 to 2010, in 10 different urban locations, found the prevalence to range from 0.2 to 1.1 per 1000 (9). The prevalence of RHD in India, based on population survey, was found to be 2.2/1000 in rural areas and 1.23/1000 in urban areas (10),(11),(12).

Diagnosis of rheumatic fever- the Jones criteria, was introduced in 1944, which included major and minor criteria, which was further modified by American heart association and world health organisation in order to improve specificity. Diagnosis of rheumatic fever required the demonstration of streptococcal aetiology (13),(14), which improved specificity but compromised with sensitivity.

Recurrence of RHD occurs if an initial episode has involved the heart (15). Systematic screening with ECHO in comparison to clinical screening reveal much higher prevalence of RHD (>10 times) (15). It can be recognised with clinical features like onset of new murmur, pericardial rub, development of features of congestive heart failure with evidence of cardiomegaly in chest X-ray and previous echocardiographic study diagnosing RHD (16). The burden on healthcare system also involves repeated hospital admissions and expensive surgical interventions (17), handling the complications like cerebrovascular accidents, thromboembolic phenomenon, acute ischemia, arrhythmia, Infective Endocarditis (IE), pregnancy with RHD and prosthetic valve thrombosis (18),(19),(20). At the time of presentation, about 50% of newly diagnosed RHD patients had complications (21). Primordial, primary, secondary prophylaxis with benzathine penicillin as per WHO recommendation should be followed (22),(23).

The aims and objectives of this study were to analyse the valvular pattern of RHD with the importance of ECHO in diagnosis of RHD and to know the continuing burden of RHD in order to execute primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.

Material and Methods

The present hospital based retrospective observational study was conducted at Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. A total of 518 cases of RHD were selected as a study population among the ECHO performed between January 2016 and January 2020. The ethical committee clearance was obtained. Analysis of valvular pattern was performed using echocardiographic criteria (24). The analysis was done and completed by January 2021.

Inclusion criteria: Assessment of mitral valve and tricuspid valve included leaflet mobility, anterior mitral leaflet doming and posterior mitral leaflet restriction, valve thickening (>5 mm), thickening of sub valvular apparatus, commissural fusion, valvular calcification and assessment of mitral valve area in grading mild, moderate and severe stenosis by planimetry and EF slope.

Exclusion criteria: An exclusion criterion include degenerative mitral and aortic valve disease, congenital aortic and mitral valve disease, myxomatous mitral valve disease, trivial and functional regurgitation.

Study Procedure

MR was assessed quantitatively by measuring distal jet area relative to left atrial area and vena contracta width (narrowest portion of MR jet) and Proximal Iso Velocity Area (PISA). Aortic valve gradient was used to assess Aortic Stenosis (AS) severity. Aortic Regurgitation (AR) was assessed by jet width, percentage of jet area with respect to Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) and diastolic flow reversal (24). The tricuspid regurgitation was assessed by measuring the width of the colour jet at its narrowest point as it passes through the Vene Contracta (VC). The VC <3 mm indicates mild TR, 3 to 7 mm width moderate TR and >7 mm width severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR). Tricuspid Stenosis (TS) was indicated by doming of tricuspid valve, reduced EF slope, commissural fusion, thickening of sub-valvular apparatus, valve thickening and mean tricuspid valve gradient on continuous wave doppler of >2 mmHg (24).

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was done by tables, pie charts, percentage and ratios.

Results

In the patients who underwent 2-D ECHO over a four year period, 518 patients were diagnosed to have RHD, following the standard echocardiographic criteria. Among the patients of RHD, youngest was four years and the oldest was 80 years of age, with the average age being 41.9 years, mode 47 years and median 42 years. The age distribution is shown in (Table/Fig 1). A total of 276 (53%) were females and 242 (47%) were males with leading involvement of females.

The total number of Mitral Stenosis (MS) cases (both isolated and combined) was 446 (86% of total). Among them 243 (54%) were females and 203 (46%) were males as shown in (Table/Fig 2). Mild (94, 21%), moderate (106, 23.7%) and severe (246, 55%) MS cases were analysed. Most of the patients had moderate to severe MS at presentation.

MR cases, combined and isolated, were 393 (76% of total). Among them 220 (56%) were females and 173 (44%) were males. Thus, the most commonly involved valve was mitral valve. Mild (162, 41%), moderate (106, 26%) and severe (246, 62.5%) MR cases were analysed in the (Table/Fig 3).

AR cases were 304 (59%) with 142 (47%) females and 162 (53%) males. AR was more common in males. 195 (64%) cases had mild AR, 72 (24%) had moderate AR and 37(12%) had severe AR. Both isolated and combined valvular lesions were considered and compared in (Table/Fig 4). AS were 111 (21%) with 51 (46%) females and 60 (54%) males and mild AS was 44 (40%), moderate AS were 36 (32%) and severe AS were 31 (28%) are as shown in (Table/Fig 5).

A total of 414 cases had both MS and MR including multi-valvular lesions, with 227 (55%) being females and 187 (45%) males. Among the significant lesions (moderate and severe), isolated MS cases were 164 (32%). Of these 125 (76%) cases were severe MS and 39 (24%) cases were moderate MS. These can further be categorised under no Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) 11 (7%), mild PAH 67 (40%), moderate PAH 41 (25%) and severe PAH 45 (27%). Isolated MR was 60 cases (12%), of which moderate MR 11 (18%) and severe MR 49 (82%). These can further be categorised under no PAH 2 (3%), mild PAH 32 (53%), moderate PAH 17 (28%) and severe PAH 9 (15%). Combined MS and MR cases were 78 (15%). The total isolated and combined mitral valve lesions were 302 (58%). These can further be categorised under no PAH 4 (5%), mild PAH 32 (41%), moderate PAH 24 (31%) and severe PAH 18 (23%).

Seven (1.4%) cases had organic TS and mild-to-moderate TR. All these cases had moderate to severe MS, 4 cases had MR, 5 cases had AR, 4 cases had AS which implies that TS was associated with multi-valvular involvement. Organic tricuspid regurgitation (identified by low pressure TR) was seen in 125 cases and remaining 233 cases of TR (with moderate to severe PAH) were a resultant of mitral and aortic valve diseases.

Complications of RHD

Analysis of the complications of RHD, AF, LA thrombus, increased LA size, LV dysfunction, RV dysfunction, IE was done and the results are shown in (Table/Fig 6), (Table/Fig 7), (Table/Fig 8).

Comparing the dilated LA sizes, >4, 51.5% were 4-5 cm, 22.2% were 5-6 cm , 6% were 6-7 cm, 3% were 7-9 cm. 24.1% had mild LV dysfunction, 5.8% and 1.1% had moderate LV dysfunction, RV dysfunction as measured by TAPSE was seen in 17%. LV dysfunction indicated valvular Cardiomyopathy. IE was seen in 2.5%. Left Atrial/Appendage clot was seen in 16%.

Discussion

The RHD is non suppurative, immunological sequelae of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. In the present study, assessment of the various patterns of valvular involvement in 518 patients over a period of four years based on standard echo criteria was performed. Mitral valve involvement was the most common lesion in the present study. MS was the most common lesion (both common and isolated). Aortic valve disease was associated with mitral valve disease. Isolated aortic valve disease was seen in less number of cases. Females were more common in both MS and MR, whereas aortic valve involvement were more commonly seen in males. All these findings were similar to a previous study (25). The most common isolated lesion was MR and mixed lesion was MS+MR, in a study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Nepal (26). Organic TR, though seen in less number of cases was always associated with mitral and aortic lesions. Organic tricuspid regurgitation (identified by low pressure TR) was seen in 125 cases and remaining cases of TR were a resultant of mitral and aortic valve diseases. This was similar to a recent study (27).

The age distribution was from four years to 80 years. The disease in younger age group can be prevented by public health education by all available media, especially through video films as recommended (28). The younger age of onset (juvenile RHD) is a special feature of both public health and clinical importance (29). RHD was more common in females as seen in previous studies (30). MS was more than MR. Age group of maximum cases of MS was between 40 to 50 years. There was no organic pulmonary valve involvement in our study. Isolated aortic valve disease was seen in less number of cases. AR was more common lesion in association with mitral valve. Among aortic valve involvement more cases were mild AR. AS had almost equal number of mild, moderate and severe cases.

In combined lesions, MS+MR were more common as seen in other studies, followed by MS+AR, MR+AR, AS+AR, MS+AS, MR+AS, MS+AS. Most patients, at presentation, had moderate to severe MS with severity of PAH relating with severity of MS. Increased PAH was more in MS than MR or MS+MR. In multi-valvular involvement, MS+MR+AR was the most common valvular involvement and MS+AS+MR was rare. Multi-valvular involvement was more in the present study. In aortic and mitral valvular involvement, Mitral disease was more severe with many cases having mild AR. Significant Aortic involvement was less.

Complications of RHD: Atrial Fibrillation was seen 27.2% similar to a meta-analysis of AF in RHD (31). AF was proportionate to increasing age of the patient and LA size. IE was noted in few cases. Trans-oesophagial ECHO was done to confirm LA and LAA clots and vegetation. Valvular Cardiomyopathy was also noted. PAH was analysed with respect to valvular lesions.

Execution of continuous quality improvement strategy for implementation of management guidelines at the primary health care level can successfully improve management of RHD (32). To augment RHD global priority, proponents will need to establish more effective governance, mechanisms to facilitate collective actions, manage differences, surrounding solutions identifying positions that resonate with policy makers and funders (33). Identification of patients with mild features of the disease by ECHO will facilitate early treatment. A global vaccine that covers low income countries would be extremely helpful to eradicate RHD completely with the recent computational advancements in the field of vaccinology (34).

Limitation(s)

It was a retrospective study where the clinical features were not included and severe forms of disease were noted. Further studies including the clinical features, can be conducted.

Conclusion

The RHD continues to be a significant burden in the productive age group. Analysis of different valvular patterns indicated that Mitral valve is the most common valve involved followed by aortic valve and Tricuspid valve. More studies have concluded about the importance of echo-surveys in early detection and initiation of secondary and tertiary prevention in the population. There is a major role of secondary prevention in containment of the disease. This study indicates that RHD still continues to have a significant prevalence. It also indicates the current trends and rapid need for the change in modality for detection of the disease in endemic areas and the need for active involvement of health services by providing facilities with provision of ECHO in district hospitals and for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention with strategies as per World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. Durga Prasad Reddy, Head of Department whose encouragement, suggestions and support led to successful completion of this work. Thanks also to Rebecca, Shalini, Elisa, Sherle and Varalakshmi.

References

1.
Markowitz M, Kaplan EL. Reappearance of rheumatic fever. Adv Pediatr. 1989;36:39-65.
2.
Kaplan EL, Hill HR. Return of rheumatic fever: Consequences, implications and needs. J Pediatr. 1987;111(2):244-46. [crossref]
3.
Dodu SRA, Bothing S. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in developing countries. World Health Forum. 1989;10(2):203-12.
4.
Seckeler MD, Hoke TR. The worldwide epidemiology of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3:67-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Carapetis JR. Focus on research: Rheumatic heart disease in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;357(5):439-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kaul RR, Masoodi MA, Wani KA, Hassan G, Qureshi KA. Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in school children (5-15years) in a rural block of Srinagar. JK Pract. 2005;12:160-62.
7.
Saxena A. Rheumatic heart disease screening by "point-of-care" echocardiography: An acceptable alternative in resource limited settings. Trans Pediatr. 2015;4(3):210-13.
8.
Bhaya M, Panwar S, Beniwal R, Panwar RB. High prevalence of rheumatic heart disease detected by echocardiography in school children. Echocardiography. 2010;27:448-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Roy SB. Prevalence of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Ballabhgarh. Annual Report. Indian Council of Medical Research. 1968-1969:52.
10.
Mathur KS, Banerji SC, Nigam DK, Prasad R. Rheumatic heart disease and rheumatic fever-prevalence in a village community of Bichpuri Block Agra. J Assoc Physicians India. 1971;19:151-56.
11.
Berry JN. Prevalence survey of chronic rheumatic heart disease and rheumatic fever in Northern India. Br Heart J. 1972;34:134-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Shah B, Sharma M, Kumar R, Brahmadathan KN, Abraham VJ, Tandon R. Rheumatic heart disease: Progress and challenges in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(Suppl 1):77-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Rheumatic fever and Rheumatic heart disease. World health organ Tech Rep Series. 2004;923:01-22.
14.
WHO Technical Report Series 923. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease- Report of a WHO expert consultation, Geneva, October 29-November 1, 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2004.
15.
Marijon E, Mirabel M, Celermajer DS, Jouven X. Rheumatic heart disease. Lancet. 2012;379:953-64. [crossref]
16.
Saxena A. Echocardiographic diagnosis of chronic rheumatic valvular lesions. Global Heart. 2013;8(3):203-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Butt HI, Shahbaz A, Nawaz H, Butt K. Comparative clinical characteristics of rheumatic heart disease patients undergoing surgical valve replacement. Cureus. 2019;11(6):e4889. [crossref]
18.
Liu M, Lu L, Sun R. Rheumatic heart disease: Causes, symptoms, and treatments.Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;72(3):861-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Leal MTBC, Passos LSA, Guarçoni FV, Aguiar JMS, Silva RBRD, Paula TMN, et al. Rheumatic heart disease in the modern era: Recent developments and current challenges. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019;52:e20180041. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Katzenellenbogen JM, Ralph AP, Wyber R, Carapetis JR. Rheumatic heart disease: Infectious disease origin, chronic care approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):793. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Okella E, Wanzhu Z, Musoke C, Twalib A, Kakande B, Lwabi P, et al. Cardiovascular complications in newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease patients at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa. 2013;24(3):80-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
WHO Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease report, 12 April, 2018.
23.
Wyber R, Taubert K, Marko S, Kaplan EL. Benzathine Penicillin G for the management of RHD: Concerns about quality and access, and opportunities for intervention and improvement. Glob Heart. 2013;8(3):227-34. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, Sarano ME, Foster E, Grayburn PA. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation- A report from the American society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2017;30(4):303-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Manjunath CN, Srinivas P, Ravindranath KS. Incidence and patterns of valvular heart disease in a tertiary care high-volume cardiac center: A single center experience Indian Heart J. 2014;66(3):320-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Ram CK, Vijay MA, Navaraj P, Girija SJ. Pattern of valvular involvement in rheumatic heart disease patients in a tertiary care hospital of western Nepal. Nepalese Heart Journal. 2016;13(2):29-31. [crossref]
27.
Santhosh K. Prevalence of organic tricuspid valve disease and pattern of valvular involvement in rheumatic heart disease: An echocardiographic study. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology. 2020;10(3):111-15.
28.
Vijaykumar M, Narula J, Reddy KS, Kaplan EL. Incidence of rheumatic fever and prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in India. Int J Cardiol. 1994;43:221-22. [crossref]
29.
Padmavati S. Rheumatic heart disease: Prevalence and preventive measures in the Indian subcontinent. Heart. 2001;86:127. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr., Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patient with valvular heart disease. Circulation 2006;114:84-231. [crossref]
31.
Jean JN, Ulrich FN, Aude LN, Jan RN, Anderson N, Jean JB. Meta-Analysis of the incidence, prevalence, and correlates of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic heart disease. Global Heart. 2020;15(1):38. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
George AM, Michael MEB. RF and RHD Research. Global Heart. 2017;12(1):63-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Yusra RS, Jeremy S. Generating global priority for addressing Rheumatic Heart Disease: A qualitative policy analysis. Journal of American Heart Association. Apr 2020.
34.
Geethanjali DG, Navaneetha Krishnan K, Ussama MAM, Magdi Y. Towards developing a vaccine for rheumatic heart disease. Global Cardiology Science and Practice. 2017;2017(1):e201704. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

10.7860/JCDR/2021/50182.15288

Date of Submission: May 03, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Jun 04, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jul 10, 2021
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 04, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jun 04, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jul 08, 20 21 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com