Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 106326

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2021 | Month : August | Volume : 15 | Issue : 8 | Page : ZC27 - ZC32 Full Version

Evaluation of Secondary Chronic Suppurative Osteomyelitis of Jaw in 15 Cases: A Retrospective Analysis


Published: August 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/47426.15249
Varsha Manekar, Vandana Gadve, Vijaya Dhote, Sulabha Radke

1. Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Dentistry, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vandana Gadve,
125, Jai Hind Society, Shyam Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: vgadve011@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic osteomyelitis may become a refractory condition and is more difficult to treat. Therefore, for correct diagnosis and evaluation of chronic osteomylitis, primary health care practitioners must have knowledge of signs and symptoms associated with osteomyelitis for effective management.

Aim: To evaluate secondary chronic suppurative osteomyelitis of jaw in 15 cases.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients treated for maxillo-mandibular secondary chronic osteomyelitis over a period of six years (January 2013 to December 2018) in Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. This study was carried out in between November 2019 to November 2020. A total of fifteen cases were identified which were diagnosed as Secondary Chronic Suppurative Osteomyelitis (SCO) and treated for same. The cases were evaluated for demographic data, risk factors, aetiology, clinical presentation, radiological findings and the management. Data was collected through retrospective search of records and was arranged in descriptive tabular format without statistical analysis.

Results: Out of 15 cases 9 (60%) were female. The patients ranged in age from 21 to 56 years with a mean age of 36.6±9.0 years. The mean age at first symptoms was 35.5 years (20-55), with a standard deviation of 9.12 years. The distribution of osteomyelitis in the jaws was dominated by the cases that occurred in the mandible i.e., 73.33% (11 cases) and the maxilla 26.66% (four cases) with most common involved site was body and angle region of mandible (eight cases) followed by premolar region two cases and anterior region one case. In this study, five cases (33.33%) had carious lesion and seven cases (46.67%) had infected extraction socket. Other causes of infection were osteoradionecrosis in one case and superimposed infection like mucormycosis in two cases. The most common causes of chronic osteomyelitis of the jaws were directly related to odontogenic infections like infected unhealed socket. Decortication and curettage was done in four cases. Decortication and sequestrectomy were performed in five cases and debridement of necrosed bone in three cases. Sinus opening, debridement of necrosed wall and packing were done in three cases of SCO involving maxilla. Duration of antibiotic therapy in all patients averaged five weeks.

Conclusion: The accurate diagnosis with the help of recent imaging techniques, adequate antibiotic therapy as well as surgical treatment was keys for the success of SCO management.

Keywords

Decortication, Microbial, Odontogenic infection, Sequestrectomy, Suppuration

Osteomyelitis is an inflammation of bone (1) both cortical and cancellous (2). It develops in the jaws after a chronic odontogenic infection or of other causative factors (3). Osteomyelitis can be acute and chronic depending on the time of progress following onset of symptoms. An acute process occurs upto one month after the onset of symptoms and chronic process occurs for longer than one month (4),(5). In the majority of the cases of chronic osteomyelitis, aetiology is usually microbiologic and results from an odontogenic infection, post extraction complications, trauma, inadequate and inappropriate antibiotic therapy, diagnostic failure, infected fracture or irradiation to the mandible (6),(7).

Incidence of disease has decreased significantly following the use of broad spectrum antibiotics, advances in restorative dentistry, increased awareness of oral hygiene and better dental health care (8). Acute osteomyelitis may progress to chronic stage when antimicrobial agents prove ineffective. This chronic osteomyelitis may further becomes a refractory condition which is difficult to treat. Hence, correct diagnosis of osteomyelitis is decisive (9) and health care practitioners must have a thorough knowledge of the signs and symptoms for correct evaluation and effective management.

Correct diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis can be done by various methods that include microbial culture, bone biopsy, conventional radiography, computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, radioisotope bone scanning (10). In chronic mandibular osteomyelitis clinical course is characterised by chronic pain, abscess, purulent discharge with intraoral and extraoral fistula. Severe complications like pathologic fracture and neuropalsy are commonly reported (11). The treatment of chronic mandibular osteomyelitis involves surgical intervention and prolonged antibiotics administration (12). In the management of chronic osteomyelitis, Bamberger DM suggested administering atleast four weeks of antibiotic therapy after surgical intervention (13) whereas Kim SG and Jang HS suggested antibiotic therapy for eight weeks postsurgery for successful results (11).

The present study was conducted to retrospectively analyse all the cases of secondary chronic osteomyelitis treated in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over a period of six years for demographic factors, probable aetiological factors, clinical and radiographic findings, microbial sensitivity testing, treatment methods.

Material and Methods

In this retrospective study, the records were searched for all the patients treated for maxillo-mandibular secondary chronic osteomyelitis over a period of six years (January 2013 to December 2018) in Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. This study was carried out in from November 2019 to November 2020.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria were all cases of SCO of jaws of all ages. Patients with history of malignant pathology were excluded. A total of 15 cases were included in the retrospective analysis.

Intervention was search of records for cases of SCO. The cases were evaluated for demographic data, probable aetiological factors, risk factors, clinical presentation, radiological findings, management and follow-up for two years. Data was collected for habits and any systemic diseases. The diagnostic criteria of SCO included were clinical presentation as well as imaging. The Orthopantomograph (OPG), conventional multislicing Computed Tomography (CT), Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) findings were recorded. Microbial culture and sensitivity test findings were also recorded.

Statistical Analysis

Data was collected through retrospective search of records and was arranged in descriptive tabular format without statistical analysis.

Results

The patients ranged in age from 21 to 56 years with a mean age of 36.6 years, with a standard deviation of 9.0 years. The mean age at which first symptoms appeared was 35.5 years (20-55), with a standard deviation of 9.12 years. Age distribution of patients is shown in (Table/Fig 1). Of the 15 patients, nine were female (60%) and six were male (40%).

The distribution of osteomyelitis in the jaws was dominated by the cases that occurred in mandible i.e., 11 cases (73.33%) and maxilla four cases (26.67%). In mandible most common involved site was body and angle region (eight cases) followed by premolar region (two cases) and anterior region (one case). In maxilla, involved site was premolar region (two cases). Superimposed fungal infection (one case) was noted in maxilla involving bilateral maxilla and one case involving unilateral maxilla from anterior to posterior region. Percentage of region wise distribution of lesion in mandible and maxilla is shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Four cases of maxilla had characteristic features of osteomyelitis, out of which two cases had odontogenic infection and two cases had superimposed fungal infection. Out of 15 patients, five patients had diabetes mellitus and one patient had habit of alcoholism and smoking. Probable cause of osteomyelitis in these patients was predominantly odontogenic in nature. In this study, five cases had carious lesion and seven cases had infected extraction socket. Other causes of infection were osteoradionecrosis in one case (Table/Fig 3).

The symptoms of all patients were recorded. In most cases primary complaints were swelling, pain and pus discharge associated with carious tooth or extraction socket. In some cases, extraoral discharging sinus and exposed necrosed bone were also noted (Table/Fig 4). Orthopantomograph (Table/Fig 5)a,b of patient, authors can appreciate the extension of lesion in coronal sections of CBCT especially in cases of bucco-lingual extension and cortical changes. Total 12 cases (80%)of patient had clinical and radiological findings consistent with osteomyelitis. In six cases sequestra formation was seen on the radiograph.

Antibiotic drug therapy and surgical treatment were given. Ten cases were treated on outpatient basis and five cases required hospital admission for Intravenous (IV) antibiotic medicament administration. The surgical procedure used in SCO were extraction of involved tooth, decortication and curettage, saucerisation and sequestrectomy. Surgical treatment in mandible was decortication and curettage was done in four cases, decortication and sequestrectomy were performed in five cases and debridement of necrosed bone in three cases and sinus opening, debridement of necrosed wall and packing were done in three cases of SCO involving maxilla (Table/Fig 4).

In all patients average duration of antibiotic therapy was five weeks. Treatment was started with intravenous antibiotics. Inj. ceftriaxone injection 1 g or amoxyclav 1.2 g IV 12 hourly. Inj. gentamycin 5 mg/kg every 24 hour (q24h), Inj metronidazole IV 100 mL (eight hourly) for two weeks along with surgical debridement followed by oral medicaments which includes Tab. amoxyclav 625 mg eight hourly and Tab. metronidazole 500 mg orally tds (eight hourly) for three weeks (Table/Fig 4).

In this study, seven cases responded well to empirical antibiotic therapy, remaining eight cases were not responded to empirical therapy underwent for culture and sensitivity test for definitive antibiotic therapy. In two cases culture were reported fungal infection by mucormycosis and other two culture showed Klebsiella infection and four culture showed no microorganisms growth (Table/Fig 6).

Mucormycosis cases were treated with Inj. amphotericin B (given in dextrose 5% in water) intravenously at a dose of 1.0-1.5 mg/kg daily, Inj. cephotaxim 1 gm 12 hourly, Inj. metronidazole IV 100 mL 8 hourly (Table/Fig 4).

The patients were reviewed regularly during periodic follow-up visits in the Outpatient Department (OPD). Satisfactory healing was observed and there were no clinical signs or symptoms to indicate persistent infection, except in one case having habit of tobacco chewing and alcoholism reported with fracture mandible and recurrence of infection. Total three cases were reported with paresthesia in lower lip of affected region. Every patient was kept under long-term follow-up for over 24 months and remained symptom free. Uneventful healing without any recurrence showed in 10 cases. One case of Mucormycosis was transferred to Ear, Nose and Throat Department (ENT) for further management (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

The classification of osteomyelitis as acute, subacute or chronic is based on the time of onset and clinical presentation (14). Typical signs and symptoms of acute osteomyelitis of jaws are pain oedema fever and malaise which occurs in early phase of the disease. However, with the chronic condition, in the later phase of the disease, systemic signs and symptoms may be reduced, but there may still be swelling, purulence, drainage, open wounds, bone exposure, or sequestration (4),(5),(15). According to Marx RE et al., chronic disease is seem to be of greater than one month duration month duration and may represent either a lack of response to initial therapy or an overpowering of the host defences (16).

In this study, majority of the cases were referred to our institution by general dentist after the failure of initial care. The assessed cases in this study were of chronic suppurative osteomyelitis as described in the literature. In our study, 60% were female and 40% were male, which is comparable with survey by Andre CV which showed (55%) patients were females, 45% were males (17) and contrast to some surveys Koorbusch GF et al., showed men (74%) and women (26%) and in Malik S and Singh G survey the male patients (62%) outnumbered the female (38%) (8),(18).

The average age of this study population was almost 36 years. In the study of Kim SG and Jang HS it was shown that the percentage of chronic osteomyelitis was highest in the age group of 50-59 years (11). However, this study revealed that chronic osteomyelitis patients were relatively younger.

Primary site of infection was angle and body regions of the mandible which is consistent with other similar studies (8),(11),(18).

In case of odontogenic infections, the highest percentage (46.66%) (seven cases) had infected unhealed socket followed by pulpitis (40%) (five cases). The most common causes of chronic osteomyelitis of the jaws were directly related to odontogenic infections such as infected unhealed socket (46.66%), whereas Kim SG and Jang HS found that chronic osteomyelitis had odontogenic causes only 38% of the time (11). Economically weaker sections, lack of awareness, illiteracy and mistreatments are the reasons for late reporting of the patient (18).

Chronic osteomyelitis is a slow and persistent inflammatory disease of bone that is characterised by necrosis of mineralised and marrow tissues, suppuration, resorption, sclerosis, and hyperplasia (11). In acute stage, suppurative osteomyelitis of the mandible is usually treated by appropriate and adequate antibiotic therapy which may prevent progression of the inflammatory disease (19),(20) whereas in chronic suppurative osteomyelitis, symptoms include deep pain, fever, and constitutional symptoms and pus exudes around the sulcus and then break the cutaneous barrier and form the fistula (19),(20). The primary goal of treatment in chronic osteomyelitis is to provide resolution of the infection by removing the source and includes aggressive surgical debridement along with accurate antimicrobial drug therapy (14). Clinical presentations in the study included local pain, fever, swelling, purulent discharge, intraoral and skin fistula, infected unhealed socket in the oral cavity.

The significance of radiological evaluation is twofold: to differentiate osteomyelitis from other conditions that show similar signs and symptoms like early stage malignant bone tumour, osteogenic sarcoma, fibrous dysplasia and to check the progress of the disease and its response to treatment (21). The orthopantomograph, conventional multislicing computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography are the major imaging tools used. The multiplanar slices and computer-generated 3D reconstructions are easier to interpret than conventional radiographs. Cone beam CT scans are capable of creating a three dimensional image of a focused area with a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional CT scans (19).

Yoshiura K et al., classified computed tomography patterns of osteomyelitis into lytic, mixed, sclerotic and sequestrum patterns (22). Mixed pattern cases showed diffuse bone abnormalities, along with cortical plate perforation and periosteal reaction. In this study, for diagnosis of chronic suppurative osteomylities, radiological investigations like cone beam computed tomography, orthopantomograph were advised which showed osteolytic changes in six cases, mixed pattern seen in two cases whereas none of the case showed sclerotic pattern, in five cases sequestration formation seen. In cases of lesion extending in buccolingual direction, tomographic images in the axial, coronal and sagittal directions are easy to evaluate (19).

Management of SCO included a course of antimicrobial drug therapy in combination with surgical debridement. Management protocol is consistent with the published protocols of Koorbusch GF et al., Van Merkesteyn JP et al., Kim S and Jang H which showed 94.9% successful outcome when surgery was followed by two weeks of intravenous antibiotics (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefazolin and an aminoglycoside) followed by six weeks of oral administration (amoxicillin/clavulanic and roxythromycin (8),(9),(11). Clindamycin and metronidazole were used according to culturing and sensitivity tests).

The minimum duration of antibiotic therapy to treat chronic suppurative osteomyelitis should be atleast two weeks (23) however, Bamberger DM suggested that a minimum of four weeks are needed (13). In this study, the patients analysed were treated by antimicrobial drug therapy and surgical treatment. Patients were prescribed a preoperative and postoperative course of antibiotics (for a maximum period of 60 days according to patient’s compliance and clinical progress), which in combination with surgical debridement (tooth extraction, debridement, sequestrectomy, decortications, saucerisation) was successful and effective treatment of chronic suppurative osteomyelitis. Most common microorganisms involved in the pathogenesis of osteomyelitis of the jaws are streptococcus, actinomyces, bacteroides, lactobacillus and klebsiella species (8),(11). In Immunocompromised patients, fungal organisms such as candida and aspergillus species have also been reported to cause osteomyelitis of jaws (24). The management of chronic cases is always complex. SCO cases should be treated with surgical debridement followed by systemic antibiotic drug therapy for 4-6 weeks as followed in the present study (13).

Limitation(s)

Being a retrospective nature, the present study had limitations of bias in data collection with regards to detailed parameters of study and treatment outcome.

Conclusion

Inappropriate and indiscriminate use of antibiotics may be one of the causes of non responding odontogenic infection. Selection of antibiotic should be based on culture and sensitivity tests, as a culture-directed antibiotic therapy for proper duration helps to avoid multidrug resistance, but also provide a more favourable treatment outcome. The computerised tomography remains an indispensable tool for diagnosis of SCO which can be missed on OPG. Culture directed antibiotic therapy along with aggressive surgical therapy is the key to the success of the SCO management.

References

1.
Urade M, Noguchi K, Takaoka K, Moridera K, Kishimoto H. Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible successfully treated with pamidronate: A longterm follow-up report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114:09-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Eyrich GK, Baltensperger MM, Bruder E, Graetz KW. Primary chronic osteomyelitis in childhood and adolescence: A retrospective analysis of 11 cases and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:561-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Bernier S, Clermont S, Maranda G, Turcotte JY. Osteomyelitis of the jaws. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995;61:441-42, 445-48
4.
Marx RE. Chronic osteomyelitis of the jaws. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 1991;3:367. [crossref]
5.
Mercuri LG. Acute osteomyelitis of the jaws. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 1991;3:355. [crossref]
6.
Daramola JO, Ajagbe HA. Chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible in adults: A clinical study of 34 cases. Br J Oral Surg. 1982;20:58-62. [crossref]
7.
Stafne EC. Infections of the jaws. In: Cibilisco JA, editor. Stafne’s oral radiographic diagnosis. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1985. Pp. 86.
8.
Koorbusch GF, Fotos P, Goll KT. Retrospective assessment of osteomyelitis etiology, demographics, risk factors, and management in 35 cases. Oral Surc Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;74:149-54. [crossref]
9.
Van Merkesteyn JP, Groot RH, van den Akker HP, Bakker DJ, Borgmeijer-Hoelen AM. Treatment of chronic suppurativeosteomyelitis of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26:450-54. [crossref]
10.
Gentry LO. Osteomyelitis: Options for diagnosis and management. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988;21:115-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Kim SG, Jang HS. Treatment of chronic osteomyelitis in Korea. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:394-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Diktaban G. Chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible: Case report. Am J Dent. 1992;5:335-38.
13.
Bamberger DM. Osteomyelitis. A commonsense approach to antibiotic and surgical treatment. Postgrad Med. 1993;94:177-82, 184. [crossref]
14.
Baur DA, Altay MA, Flores-Hidalgo A, Ort Y, Quereshy FA. Chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible: diagnosis and management-an institution’s experience over 7 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(4):655-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Gaetti-Jardim Je E, Ciesielski FIN, Possagno R, Castro AL, Marqueti AC, JARDIM G. Chronic osteomyelitis of the maxilla and mandible: Microbiological and clinical aspects. Int J Odontostomat. 2010;4:197-202. [crossref]
16.
Marx RE, Carlson ER, Smith BR, Toraya N. Isolation of Actinomyces species and Eikenellacorrodens from patients with chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(1):26-33. [crossref]
17.
Andre CV, Khonsari R-H, Ernenwein D, Goudot P, Ruhin B. Osteomyelitis of the jaws: A retrospective series of 40 patients J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;118(5):261-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Malik S, Singh G. Chronic suppurative osteomyelitis of the mandible: A study of 21 cases. OHDM. 2014;13(4):971-74.
19.
Monsour PA, Dalton JB. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis involving the mandible: Case reports and review of the literature. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:184-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Craig CH, Jonathan BA, Brian R. Chronic osteomyelitis following an uncomplicated dental extraction. Journal of Canadian Dental Association. 2011;77:98.
21.
Stafne EC, Gibilisco JA, eds. Oral roentgenographic diagnosis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1975:79-85.
22.
Yoshiura K, Hijiya T, Ariji E, Sa’do B, Radiographic patterns of osteomyelitis in the mandible. Plain film/CT correlation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78(1):116-24. [crossref]
23.
Uche C, Mogyoros R, Chang A. Osteomyelitis of the jaw: A retrospective analysis. The Internet Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009;7. [crossref]
24.
Pincus DJ, Armstrong MB, Thaller SR. Osteomyelitis of the craniofacial skeleton. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23(2):73-79. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

10.7860/JCDR/2021/47426.15249

Date of Submission: Oct 24, 2020
Date of Peer Review: Dec 19, 2020
Date of Acceptance: Apr 08, 2021
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 28, 2020
• Manual Googling: Apr 07, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jul 07, 2021 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com