Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 119116

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : DC06 - DC09 Full Version

Culture Positivity of Cerebrospinal Fluid by Automated Blood Culture System in Neonates: A Cross-sectional Study from Loni, Maharashtra, India


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52513.15842
Savita Baban Tajane, Anagha Subhashchandra Vaidya, Deepika Shivaji Bhalerao, Shahriar Bahman Roushani, Sanjeev Gopalrao Kulkarni, Vaibhav Vitthalrao Rajhans, Anita Balakrishnan Nair

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU), Loni, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU), Loni, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU), Loni, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU), Loni, Maharashtra, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU), Loni, Maharashtra, India. 6. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU), Loni, Maharashtra, India. 7. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU), Loni, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anagha Subhashchandra Vaidya,
Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU), Loni, Tal. Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar-413736, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: anagha.kinikar@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Bacterial meningitis especially in neonates remains a major cause of mortality and long term health sequelae. There is a need for periodic review, since pathogens responsible for the meningitis vary with time and geography.

Aim: To find the culture positivity of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) specimens before and after installation of automated blood culture and identification system in suspected neonatal meningitis cases.

Materials and Methods: The present descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out during July 2020 to December 2020, for six months duration in Department of Microbiology, Rural medical college, (Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences-Deemed University), Loni, Maharashtra, India. All CSF specimens from neonates <28 days received in Department of Microbiology were included in the study. All CSF specimens collected in BacT/Alert bottle were incubated and further subjected to identification by Vitek 2 system. All CSF specimen smears, received were subjected to Gram staining and Ziehl Neelsen Staining. Descriptive statistics was used for result analysis.

Results: A total of 265 CSF specimens were received during the study period. Males (59%) outnumbered females (41%) in the present study. Bacterial growth by automated blood culture system (BacT/Alert 3D) was detected in 85 CSF specimen giving the culture positivity as 32.08%. The most common bacterial isolate was found to be Staphylococcus haemolyticus followed by Enterococcus species and Acinetobacter species. Also, an attempt was made to compare culture positivity results with results by conventional culture method before installation of automation which showed heightened results for culture positivity and diversity of clinical isolates.

Conclusion: Bacterial neonatal meningitis is a common entity and aetiological diagnosis is crucial in every healthcare setting. The present study describes the various aetiological agents isolated by automated blood culture system in neonatal CSF specimens. Retrospective comparison with conventional culture has shown promising results for automated system. Early isolation and definitive identification with drug sensitivity, has got massive impact in management of neonate, further in timely progression of child’s developmental milestones.

Keywords

Automated blood culture system, Cerebrospinal fluid culture, Gram positive cocci, Neonatal meningitis

Bacterial meningitis is one of the Central Nervous System (CNS) disorders, which is an infection of the membranes (meninges) and CSF surrounding the brain and spinal Cord. It is one of the major causes of disability worldwide. Bacterial meningitis remains a severe infection with high rate of mortality. Earlier clinical suspicion and implementation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy were critical to minimise adverse outcomes therefore, accurate diagnosis is necessary regarding the important aetiological agents to ensure appropriate management (1),(2).

The CSF is normally water clear has no more than five lymphocytes per mm, has glucose concentration between 45 and 100 mg/dL, protein concentration between 14 to 45 mg/dL and it is sterile. Infectious agents can get to the CNS through the blood stream or by direct extension from adjacent structures. The neonatal sepsis is prompting factor for meningitis (3),(4),(5).

Most cases of bacterial meningitis occur in early childhood. Pathogens which infect CNS system are different in different child age groups. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influnezae type-b are among the prevalent bacterial pathogens of this disease. There has been a decrease in the incidence of I#IH.I?I influenzae type b (Hib) and S. pneumoniae meningitis in countries where vaccination plan is generally performed against the two bacteria. Recently, Universal Immunisation Program by Government of India has included the H. influenzae (Hib) vaccine for children (5),(6).

Meningitis in neonates most commonly results from the infection that is acquired from mother in utero or during vaginal delivery. In neonates, clinical signs and symptoms of CNS infections are often non specific and include fever, hypothermia, food retention, skin lesions, irritability or general malaise. Meningitis is mainly diagnosed on the basis of history, clinical examination, and CSF examination by conventional culture methods and automated culture methods. Gram stain of CSF can provide a rapid preliminary identification of the infective organism (7),(8).

Growth of the organism is frequently hampered by less number of organisms and their slow growth in CSF specimen by conventional method. The use of blood culture system for the culture of normally sterile body fluids other than blood is widely accepted now (7),(8),(9).

The BacT/Alert PF plus bottles provides detection of microorganisms when a small volume of blood/body fluid is available. An inoculated bottle is placed into the instrument where it is incubated and continuously monitored for the presence of microorganisms. The BacT/Alert Microbial detection system utilises a colorimetric sensor and reflected light to monitor the presence and production of carbon dioxide (CO2) dissolved in the culture medium. If microorganisms are present in the test sample, CO2 is produced as the organisms metabolise the substrate in the culture medium. When growth of the organisms produces CO2, the colour of the gas permeable sensor installed in the bottom of each culture bottle changes from blue-green to yellow and signals the growth positive bottle (8),(9),(10),(11),(12).

The Vitek 2 compact system uses a fluorogenic methodology for organism identification and a Turbidimetric method for susceptibility testing using a 64 well card that is barcoded with information (9),(10),(11).

The present study was planned to find the culture positivity of neonatal bacterial meningitis in and around the Pravara Rural hospital, Loni, Maharashtra, India. Also, an attempt was made to compare observations with culture positivity for six months before installation of automated system by conventional technique retrospectively.

Material and Methods

The present descriptive cross-sectional laboratory based study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, Rural Medical College, (PIMS-DU) Loni, Maharashtra, India, during July 2020 to December 2020. The study was approved by Institutional Ethical Committee (Reg.No.DR/RMC/UG-PG/2020/102).

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged <28 days were included with both genders.

Exclusion criteria: Patients more than 28 days and repeat specimen from the neonate were excluded.

Sample collection: All the CSF specimens from both genders, age less than or 28 days, were received in the Department of Microbiology with duly filled requisition form with request to do culture and sensitivity. Informed consent was taken by clinician before collecting specimen.

Procedure

Aerobic BacT/Alert PF plus bottle which was inoculated with CSF specimen (approximately, 0.1 mL-2 mL) and two glass slides with CSF smears from the suspected cases of meningitis from the ward/Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/Paediatric Intensive Care Unit were received in the Department of Microbiology. Two glass slides with CSF smear were heat fixed and stained by Gram staining and Ziehl Neelsen and further subjected to direct microscopy. CSF inoculated aerobic BacT/Alert PF plus bottles were incubated in BacT/Alert incubator for a maximum period of five days or until designated positive for growth. The automated BacT/Alert Microbial Detection System gave signals the bottle with growth of organism. Smear and subculture of all positive bottles was done on Mac-Conkey agar, blood agar and chocolate agar. Identification of organism was done by automated identification system. Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing (AST) was done by automated Vitek-2 system (10). Routine conventional culture technique included the direct inoculation of CSF specimens on Mac-Conkey, blood agar and chocolate agar. After overnight incubation the isolates were identified by conventional biochemicals reactions. An antibiotic susceptibility test was performed by Kirby Bauer Disc diffusion method with standard technique (3),(10).

Statistical Analysis

Since the present study was descriptive type, descriptive statistics was used for data analysis.

Results

A total of 265 CSF specimens were received during the study period. In the present study, mean neonatal age was found to be 5.3 days. Male neonates 157 (59%) population was higher than the female 108 (41%) neonates. Smear positivity and culture positivity were fairly associated in the study (Table/Fig 1). (Table/Fig 2) shows CSF culture positivity in neonate study population by automated culture system as 85 (32.07%) out of 265. Culture positivity in male and female population was much similar. Day wise BacT/Alert flag positivity by automated culture system was maximally seen on 1st and 2nd day (35, 41.18 % and 27, 31.76%) of incubation (Table/Fig 3). Culture positivity and organism wise distribution of CSF isolates by automated culture system and conventional culture (before installation of automated system) showed various gram positive and gram negative organisms where most common gram positive isolate found was Staphylococcus species (43 out of 63) by automated culture (Table/Fig 4). An attempt was made to compare the culture positivity of automated culture system and conventional culture technique before installation of automated system which showed very encouraging observations for automated system. Organism wise distribution by conventional culture method showed dominance of gram negative isolates retrospectively (Table/Fig 4). Drug resistance for gram positive and gram negative organism by Vitek 2 system is shown in (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

Present study was rare, as authors selected neonate population and intended to see the result of CSF culture positivity before and after installation of automated culture system. Before installation of automated system, authors were routinely using conventional method for CSF culture and sensitivity. Department of Microbiology do compile culture positivity and sensitivity data periodically which actually lead to do such study in department. To some extent, authors compared the result and found augmented culture yield by automated culture system. Other than culture positivity, authors could identify the isolates till species level with standard antibiotic susceptibility test results within a short time frame. Also, it was advantageous to identify few bacterial isolates which could not be identified with conventional method easily.

The present study showed the dominance of male neonates (59%) over female neonates (41%) which was quite similar to the study by Umate S et al., in Mumbai which comprised (62.0%) of male neonate population in their study (13) and Kaul V et al., also noted the male predominance while some studies did not noted any gender dominance (14),(15),(16). CSF culture positivity by automated culture system in present study was found to be (32.08%) which was comparable to the neonatal study by Boskabadi H et al., in Tonekabon (Iran) which reports it to be (36.5%) (17).

Direct microscopy using Gram stain and Zeihl Neelsen stain was done on all (265) received CSF specimen smears. The bacterial pathogen could be demonstrated by gram stain in 60 neonatal CSF specimens (22.64%), while in total 85 (32.08%) specimen’s yielded growth. This signifies necessity of gram staining method as rapid affordable method for provisional diagnosis of bacterial meningitis in Indian scenario. Gram staining depends on several factors like the number of organism present, prior use of antibiotics and techniques used. Low yield of microscopy result may be due to scanty smear of CSF specimen on slides. But, the use of automated system definitely increased the culture yield. No acid fast bacilli was found in any of the specimen indicating very low probability of mycobacterial aetiology in neonatal meningitis. Observations of gram stain were comparable to observations made by Mani R et al., in there bacterial meningitis study done at Bangalore (18).

Among causative agents, authors found the predominance of gram positive organism (74.0%) than gram negative organism (26.0%) by automated culture system. Studies by Cohen-Wolkowiez M et al., and Devi U et al., showed the predominant gram-negative organisms in neonates (19),(20). Paediatric study by Attia Bari FZ et al., (21) in Lahore, showed the gram positive organisms as major causative agents similar to Yoo IY et al., who used automated culture technique (7). Keniyan Neonatal meningitis study by Laving AM et al., reported E.coli as most common (46.7%) causative agent by Latex Particle Agglutination (LPA) assay Antigen test (22), while Dirkje de Blauw AH et al., reported E.coli as most common bacterial agent in their neonatal study of CNS infections (4).

As neonatal CSF specimen is a very precious sample, author could not ask it for both conventional and automated culture simultaneously. An attempt was made to compare the results of six months prospective data with the six months retrospective CSF culture data by conventional method only before installation of BacT ALERT automated system. Out of 191 specimens received for conventional culture, only 11 showed the growth of bacteria giving culture positivity (5.75%). In which gram positive organism were found to be fewer (1 out of 11) and dominance of gram negative (10 out 11) organism was observed. Most of the time identification was made till genus level only. In the neonatal study by Laving AM et al., the CSF culture positivity by conventional method was reported to be 17.9% and gram negative organism as major aetiological agent (22).

Advantage of automated culture was its flag positivity which can be as early as day 1st of incubation further reducing the time for final culture report. Out of 265 specimens, 41.18% and 31.76% specimens were flagged positive on day 1 and day 2, respectively. Authors could also report antibiotic susceptibility results at earliest which is very important and relevant for decisions by clinicians to switch over the antibiotics.

MRSA incidence in present neonatal study was found to be 83.33% and incidence of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) was 23.07% by automated Vitek 2 system. In gram negative bacterial isolates, incidence of Multidrug Resistance (MDR) was found to be 9.09%. This can be compared to study by Devi U et al., who reported VRE as 50% and high incidence of resistance in gram negative isolates (20).

In present study, most common gram positive isolate found as Staphylococcus species. Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus homminis, Micrococcous luteus, Kocuria rhizophilia, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus arlette, Kocuria kristinae, Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus gallinarum belong to group Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CONS) which were identified by Vitek 2 Compact system to species level.

A total of 42 (49.4%) CONS were among the 85 total isolates indicating the labelling of CONS as emerging pathogen. The Korean paediatric BacT/alert CSF culture study by Yoo IY et al., also found CONS as most common isolate (7). Amongst CONS Staph. haemolyticus was most common isolate followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus hominis by the Vitek 2 system. Among Streptococci, authors found Enterococcus species as most common and Streptococcus pyogenes as of two isolates only. Among the Enterococcus species E.faecium was most common (10 out of 13) than E.faecalis as noted by Devi U et al., in her study done in Dibrugrh (Assam) (20).

Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus arlette, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus gallinarum and Kocuria rhizophila, Kocuria kristinae were the isolates which could be identified by automated system only. Similar association of these Staphylococcal species with bacterial meningitis was mentioned by Gheibi S et al, and Azimi T et al., in their study articles (16),(23).

In present study, most common gram negative isolate as Klebsiella pneumoniae followed by Acinetobacter baumannii. Modi GB et al., also noted dominance of gram negative bacilli in his CSF culture study (24). Study by Barnawal RK et al., in Ranchi noted E.coli as most common gram negative isolate in neonate population (25). In present study, some nil fermenter pathogens like Burkholderia cepacia and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were also found which are difficult to grow and to identify by conventional culture technique. MDR, non fermenting gram negative Acinetobacter isolates (50 %) were isolated by Viswanathan R et al., in their neonatal study (26). One Serratia marcescens isolate was also observed in present study.

Though recent CSF studies are showing better sensitivity of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for detection of H. influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis agents, its practicality in routine diagnosis is questionable due to its cost and expertise support issues (27). Role of CONS as pathogen is a debatable and many authors reported it as major CSF isolate which gives it growing significance (21),(28),(29).

In the present study, Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria meningitidis were not isolated similar to finding by Debnath DJ et al., a study from Maharashtra (30). In contrast NIMHANS, Bangalore study accounted for Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria meningitidis, though less in number (18). Except few cities of North India, low incidence of endemic meningococcal disease is reported in India (31). Geographically, study place is situated in western part of India where people are much aware of child immunisation leading to very low presence of these agent in community.

Limitation(s)

The study could not do the CSF culture by conventional and automated culture system in parallel due to very small quantity of CSF available for culture from the neonates.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates the advantage of automated culture technique for better recovery of organism from CSF in neonates and timely availability of results. Comparison of BacT/Alert results with earlier conventional culture outcomes showed promising results. The present research recommends the routine CSF culture by automated culture system especially in paediatric population.

References

1.
Winn, Wasington C, Gary P, Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenbergu PC. Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology, 7th edition. lippincott Williams and Wikins. 2006:90-93.
2.
Mackie TJ, Collee JG, McCartney JE. Mackie and McCartnry Practical Medical Microbiology Book 14 edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996:77-80.
3.
Cheesebrough M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. 2nd ed; 2005:116-24. [crossref]
4.
Dirkje de Blauw AH, Vijn LJ, Wildenbeest JG, Wolthers KC, Biezeveld MH, van Wermeskerken AM, et al. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid characteristics in neonates with a suspected central nervous system infection. Medicine. 2019;98(25):e16079. Doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016079. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Tille, Patricia M. author. Bailey and Scott's Diagnostic Microbilogy. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2014:966-75.
6.
Muhammad J, Rehman Y, Amir S. Etiological spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity in children with acute pyogenic meninigitis. J Med Sci. 2018;26(3)234-36.
7.
Yoo IY, Chun S, Song DJ, Huh HJ, Lee NY. Comparison of BacT/Alert FAN and FAN plus bottles with conventional medium for culturing cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(11):2837-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Simor AE, Scythes K, Meaney H, Louie M. Evaluation of the BacT/Alert® microbial detection system with FAN aerobic and FAN anaerobic bottles for culturing normally sterile body fluids other than blood. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2000;37(1):05-09. [crossref]
9.
Pincus D. Microbial identification using the biomerieus vitek's system. Encyclopedia of rapid microbiology. 01-09.
10.
Clinical and laboratory standards institute, performas standards for antimicrobial suspectibility testing, M100-S25,vol 37 No.1 Jan 2017, CLSI, Wayne, PA 19087 USA.
11.
Flayhart D, Borek AP, Wakefield T, Dick J, Carroll KC. Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:816-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Miller R, Houlberg K. Meningitis service age personnel. Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service. 2015;(101):63-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Umate S, Garg BD, Kabra NS. Incidence of meningitis in neonates with late-onset sepsis at a Tertiary Care Center in Western India: An observational study. J Clin Neonatol. 2019;8:67-70. [crossref]
14.
Kaul V, Harish R, Ganjoo S, Mahajan B, Raina SK, Koul D, et al. Importance of obtaining lumbar puncture in neonates with late onset septicemia a hospital based observational study from North-West India. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2:83-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Jiang JH, Chiu NC, Huang FY, Kao HA, Hsu CH, Hung HY, et al. Neonatal sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit: Characteristics of early versus late onset. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2004;37:301-06.
16.
Gheibi S, Fakoor Z, Karamyyar M, Khashabi J, Ilkhanizadeh B, Asghari-Sana F, et al. Coagulase negative Staphylococcus the most common cause of neonatal septicemia in Urmia, Iran. Iran J Pediatr. 2008;18:237-43.
17.
Boskabadi H, Heidari E, Zakerihamidi M. Etiology, clinical findings and laboratory parameters in neonates with acute bacterial meningitis. Iran J Microbiol. 2020;12(2):89-97. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Mani R, Pradhan S, Nagarathna S, Wasiulla R, Chandramuki A. Bacteriological profile of community acquired acute bacterial meningitis: A ten-year retrospective study in a tertiary neurocare centre in South India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007;25:108-14. [crossref]
19.
Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Moran C, Benjamin DK, Cotten CM, Clark RH, Benjamin Jr DK, et al. Early and late onset sepsis in late preterm infants. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2009;28(12):1052. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Devi U, Bora R, Malik V, Deori R, Gogoi B, Das JK, et al. Bacterial aetiology of neonatal meningitis: A study from north-east India. The Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2017;145(1):138. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Attia Bari FZ, Zafar A, Ejaz H, Iftikhar A, Rathore AW. Childhood acute bacterial meningitis: Clinical spectrum, bacteriological profile and outcome. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2016;26(10):822-26.
22.
Laving AM, Musoke RN, Wasunna AO, Revathi G. Neonatal bacterial meningitis at the newborn unit of Kenyatta National Hospital. East African Medical Journal. 2003;80(9):456-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Azimi T, Mirzadeh M, Sabour S, Nasser A, Fallah F, Pourmand MR. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) meningitis; A narrative review of the literature from 2000 to 2020. New Microbes and New Infections. 2020;2020:100755. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Modi GB, Patel KD, Soni ST, Patel KJ, Mangukiya JD, Jain PS. Bacteriological profile of pyogenic meningitis in tertiary care hospital, Ahmedabad. Natl J Med Res. 2012;2(3):313-17.
25.
Barnawal RK, Kumar M, Sharma AK, Prasad A, Kumari S, Priydarshini V. Microbiological Profile of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) in pyogenic meningitis patients at tertiary care hospital. Int J Med Res Prof. 2018;4(3):113-18. Doi: 10.21276/ijmrp.2018.4.3.023.
26.
Viswanathan R, Singh AK, Basu S, Chatterjee S, Roy S, Isaacs D. Multi-drug-resistant, non-fermenting, gram-negative bacilli in neonatal sepsis in Kolkata, India: A 4-year study. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2014;34:56-59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Seth R, Murthy PSR, Sistla S, Subramanian M, Tamilarasu K. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute pyogenic meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type b and Neisseria meningitidis using a multiplex PCR assay. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(9):FC01-04. Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28114.10532. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Basri R, Zueter AR, Mohamed Z, Alam MK, Norsa'adah B, Hasan SA, et al. Burden of bacterial meningitis: A retrospective review on laboratory parameters and factors associated with death in meningitis, Kelantan Malaysia. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2015;77(1-2):59-68. PMID: 25797971; PMCID: PMC4361508. [PubMed]
28.
Singh A, Kumar A, Gaur V, Jasuja J, Pandey J, Mishra R. Bacteriological profile of acute bacterial meningitis at a tertiary care hospital of North India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(10):4387-93. [crossref]
30.
Debnath DJ, Wanjpe A, Kakrani V, Singru S. Epidemiological study of acute bacterial meningitis in admitted children below twelve years of age in a tertiary care teaching Hospital in Pune, India. Med J D Y Patil Univ. 2012;5:28-30. [crossref]
31.
Sinclair D, Preziosi MP, Jacob John T, Greenwood B. The epidemiology of meningococcal disease in India: Epidemiology of meningococcal disease in India. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15:1421. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52513.15842

Date of Submission: Sep 22, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 03, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 11, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: Authors are thankful to PIMS, Loni (Deemed to be University)
for providing institutional support.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 23, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 05, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 08, 2021 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com