Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 96569

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : June | Volume : 16 | Issue : 6 | Page : AC11 - AC14 Full Version

Correlation of Morphometric Parameters of Spleen and Height of the Deceased: A Cross-sectional Study in North Indian Population


Published: June 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57201.16506
Bhumica Dang, Sanjay Gupta, Ravi Batra, Pradeep Bokariya, Vivek Singh Malik, Jyoti Rohila

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Mahtama Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevgram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Mahtama Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevgram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Professor, Department of Anatomy, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences, Mohali, Punjab, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Pradeep Bokariya,
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of
Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: pradeepbokariya@mgims.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: Estimation of stature is a major forensic anthropological concern used in the identification of unknown and mutilated human remains. Studies considering spleen morphometric parameters to decipher the height of the deceased are very rare especially in Haryana, though, research studies involving correlation between height and other body organs have been done.

Aim: To determine the correlation between the morphometric parameters of the spleen and height of the deceased.

Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Anatomy in collaboration with the Department of Forensic Medicine in Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India, from September 2010 to September 2012. The spleen specimens (30 males and 30 females) obtained from deceased adults in the age group of 16-70 years (both age inclusive) belonging to north India from the Department of Forensic Medicine during autopsy. The measurement of splenic parameters (weight, length, breadth, thickness and surface area) was done using direct measurement (standard methodology) accepted by anthropologists. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0. Pearson’s correlation test was used to evaluate the association between the splenic parameters and height. Correlation formula was derived to calculate the height from the splenic measurements.

Results: Correlation of height was positive with splenic measurements (weight, length, breadth, thickness and total surface area) in both males and females and was significant with splenic weight (r-value=0.54 and p-value=0.02) and splenic length (r-value=0.548; p-value=0.002) in females. It was significant for splenic thickness in males (r-value=0.042; p-value=0.018) and significant for total surface area of spleen for both males and females (r-value=0.80 and p-value <0.00001 in males and r-value=0.58 and p-value=0.000781 in females).

Conclusion: Correlation of height was significant for splenic weight and length in females; significant for splenic thickness in males and significant for total surface area of spleen for males and females. This study would help anthropologists and Forensic Medicine experts to calculate the height of the deceased using various regression equations, if spleen is intact and is measured.

Keywords

Morphometry, Splenic breadth, Splenic height, Splenic length, Splenic weight

The estimation of identity of a deceased individual is very important for forensic experts (1). Spleen is the largest unit of lymphoid tissue in the body. It is situated in the upper and left part of the abdomen between the fundus of stomach and the diaphragm (2). It lies in the left hypochondrium and partly in epigastrium. Its axis is oblique and is directed downward, forwards and laterally coinciding with the tenth rib. Spleen moves with respiration and is highly vascular and has two ends i.e, medial and lateral; two surfaces i.e, diaphragmatic and visceral and two borders i.e, superior and inferior. It develops as a lobulated mass from the mesoderm of the upper part of the dorsal mesogastrium under cover of its left layer. Anterior part of dorsal mesogastrium forms gastrosplenic ligament while the posterior part persists as lienorenal ligament (3),(4). Spleen plays a key role in the interactions between the circulatory, reticuloendothelial and immune systems due to its unique architecture (3). The different types of shapes of spleen are tetrahedral, wedge and triangular. The diagrammatic representation of different shapes of spleen has been shown in (Table/Fig 1) (2). Its average dimensions are approximately: length 5 inches, breadth 3 inches and thickness 1.5 inches. The average weight in the adult is about 80-150 gm (3),(5),(6). One of the factors in establishing the identity of a person is his stature and since the last few decades the anthropometric work related to the correlation between the height of an individual and morphometry of body organs has been carried out (7),(8). Demissie S et al., in Southern Ethiopia studied morphometric assessment of spleen dimensions and its correlates among individuals in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia (7). Gowraiah HL and Machikalapati SR, studied correlation between anthropometric parameters and volume, weight and size of normal spleen in Andhra Pradesh and found it significant (8). The present study will be of use to anthropologists and forensic experts to find the height of the deceased when the parameters of the splenic specimen is known and is different from other studies done using Ultrasound (USG) and Computed Tomography (CT) (7),(9).

The present study was conducted to see the correlation of height with morphometric parameters of spleen (weight, length, breadth, thickness and total surface area) in North Indian population (specifically of Haryana). Spleen was chosen for the study in place of other organs because of its ease of measurement and handling and procurement.

Material and Methods

The cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Anatomy in collaboration with the Department of Forensic Medicine in Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Hrayana, India, from September 2010 to September 2012. Prior to commencement of the study, permission from the Institutional Ethics Committee was taken. Informed consent was obtained from the relatives before the procurement of the specimens.

Source of the history had been the file of the patient wherein all the details as name, age, sex, height, weight, medical history as previous illness and present illness and address had been noted.

Inclusion criteria: The specimens were selected only from fresh cadavers within 24 hours of death because after this time-duration the morphometry is altered due to decomposition and the spleen becomes pulpy, greenish steel and gets reduced to a different mass (3).

Exclusion criteria: The burn cases and deaths occurring due to known diseases that affect spleen size grossly, such as malaria, typhoid, miliary tuberculosis, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), hepatitis, connective tissue disorders, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis, thalassaemia, polycythemia, lymphomas and other malignancies have been excluded from the study.

Sample Collection

Before proceeding for collection of data, detailed history of the deceased was obtained from records of the Forensic Department. Considering the duration and frequency of availability of deceased in Forensic Department the sample size was estimated as 60 (30 males and 30 females) by using Epi software. A total of 60 spleens were chosen by employing convenience sampling during postmortem examination of apparently healthy individuals (30 males and 30 females) of age ranging from 16-70 years belonging to Haryana Region of North India, verified based on their permanent addresses. Source of the history had been the file of the patient wherein all the details as name, age, sex, height, weight, medical history as previous illness and present illness and address had been noted.

History of the deceased had been examined carefully to adhere to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Morphometric Parameters

The morphometric parameters and the methods used were as follows:

1. Length of spleen: It was noted on diaphragmatic surface by a thread from superior angle to inferior angle passing through maximum convexity (9). The measurement of length has been shown in (Table/Fig 2)a.
2. Breadth of spleen: Breadth was noted on diaphragmatic surface again by the thread passing horizontally through maximum convexity and through the mid-point of the length (9). The measurement of breadth has been shown in (Table/Fig 2)b.
3. Thickness of spleen: The thickness of spleen was done by inserting a needle at the maximum convexity and was then evaluated by measuring the length of needle embedded inside (9). The measurement of thickness has been shown in (Table/Fig 2)c.
4. Areas of various surfaces (diaphragmatic, gastric, renal and colic): These were calculated after wrapping each surface in butter paper and cutting neatly from the borders; they were outlined on the graph paper. Counting of the squares within the outline gave the surface area in square centimeters. The summation of the area of both visceral and diaphragmatic surfaces of the spleen was carried out (6). The measurement of surface area has been shown in (Table/Fig 2)d. The present study was conducted in autopsy room and time available to carry out observations was comparatively short, so, it was thought pertinent to go for methodology of surface area estimation using graph paper method. Researchers adopted radiological imaging methods for estimation of morphometry and surface areas of visceras (7),(10).
5. Height of the deceased: The records of the stature of the deceased were obtained from the Department of Forensic Medicine.

Statistical Analysis

The splenic parameters and other data were noted carefully and recorded in Microsoft Excel sheet and data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software 20.0. Independent t-test was used to evaluate the differences between the continuous variables. Pearson’s correlation test was used to assess the relationship between the splenic morphometric parameters with height of the deceased. The p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

The study population belonged to north India and 30 male and 30 female spleens were obtained from deceased adults in the age group of 16-70 years. The average age being 35.52 years in case of males (range 17-67 years) and 39.68 years in case of females (range 16-69 years).

Height of deceased in male and female: The mean height irrespective of sex was 159.61±6.24 cm. The mean height of males was 165.41±2.71 cm with a range of 162.5-170 cm. The females had a mean height of 153.25±4.64 cm with a range of 132.5-157.5 cm. This is shown in (Table/Fig 3).

Correlation of height with weight of spleen in male and female: The mean weight of spleen, irrespective of gender was 109.23±9.2 gm. The weight of the male spleen varied from 90 gm-148 gm and in females varied from 70 gm-94 gm The splenic weight showed a weak positive (r-value=0.049) and strong positive (r-value=0.54) correlation with the height of males and females respectively. The p-value for correlation in males was 0.79 and in females was 0.002 (Table/Fig 4).

Correlation of height with dimensions (length, breadth and thickness) of spleen

1. Length of spleen: The mean splenic length irrespective of gender was 10.68±1.3 cm. The length of the spleen in males ranged between 9.5 cm to 17 cm and varied from 8 cm to 13 cm in females. The p-value of correlation of height with splenic length in males was 0.79 and was not significant whereas p-value in females was 0.002 and was significant (Table/Fig 5).

2. Breadth of spleen: The mean splenic breadth irrespective of gender was 6.13±0.82 cm. The breadth of the spleen varied from 5 cm to 8 cm in males and varied from 4 cm to 8 cm in females. Correlation with height was found to be positive and moderate in females (r-value=0.11 in males and r-value=0.20 in females) (Table/Fig 6).

3. Splenic thickness: The mean splenic thickness irrespective of gender was 1.92±0.12 cm. The thickness of the spleen ranged between 1.5 cm to 2 cm in males and varied from 1.5 cm to 2 cm in females. Correlation between splenic thickness and height was significant in males (p-value=0.018) and not significant in females (p-value=0.36) (Table/Fig 7).

4. Correlation of height with total surface area of spleen: The mean splenic surface area irrespective of gender was 207.59±24.63 cm2. The total surface area of the spleen varied between 213 cm2-308 cm2 in males and varied between 123 cm2-202 cm2 in females. Correlation with height was positive in both males and females. (r-value=0.80 in males and r-value=0.58 in females) (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

In the present study, the average weight of spleen in males was 131.6±12.90 gm and in females, the average weight was 87.86±5.69 gm. Correlation of splenic weight with height in males was positive in present study. Chow KU et al., worked on establishment of normal values for spleen size in the US with 1200 individuals. They had found that splenic volume and length correlated partly with sex, height and body weight (10). Correlation was also observed in studies by Sprogøe-Jakobsen S and Sprogøe-Jakobsen U, de la Grandmaison GL et al., and Kim YS et al., (11),(12),(13). Correlation of weight with height in females was also positive in the present study. Similar findings were also supported by the studies done by Sprogoe-Jakobsen S et al., de la Grandmaison GL et al., Kim YS et al., and Deland FH (11),(12),(13),(14). Correlation was significant in females in present study (p-value=0.002) but not in males (p-value=0.79).

The average length of spleen in males was 11.45±1.43 cm and in females it was 9.91±1.18 cm. Correlation of length with height was reported by Asghar A et al., and was negative in both males and females (15). Results of the present study also matched with this study.

Correlation of splenic width with height was positive in the study by Spielmann AL et al., and Asghar A et al., (16),(17). Findings of the present study corroborates with these two studies. In present tudy, correlation was not significant for males (p-value=0.562) and females (p-value=0.28).

Splenic thickness was calculated, and average came out to be 1.89±0.16 cm. In males, average thickness was 1.86±0.17 cm and in females, it was found to be 1.92±0.15 cm. No correlation with height was found by Spielmann AL et al., (16). Correlation with height was also positive in the study done by Asghar A et al., (15). In present study, correlation was positive in both males (r-value=0.42) and females (r-value=0.17). Correlation was significant in males (p-value=0.018 and not significant in females (p-value=0.36).

Average total surface area in present study was 207.59±24.43 cm2. In males, it was 256.23±23.46 cm2 and in females it was 158.96±25.41 cm2. Correlation of surface area with height was strongly significant (r-value=0.80) in males and in females, correlation was moderately positive (r-value=0.58). This was also best supported by the study of Asghar A et al., (15). Correlation was significant in males (p-value <0.00001), as well as in females (p-value=0.000781). The comparative account of findings of other studies and present studies have been shown in (Table/Fig 9) (11),(12),(13),(14),(15),(16).

Differences in the results of other studies and the present study can be attributed to the many factors as environmental and racial causes (7). Mohtasib RS et al., did ultrasonographical examination of splenic length of full-term neonates to kids 16 years of age between 2003 to 2018 and found that spleen size had significant correlation with age and height across all ages and in both sexes (18). The present study showed positive correlation between height of the deceased and morphometry of the spleen.

Limitation(s)

The biggest bottleneck of the study was limited time with uncertain number of postmortems. Though findings could have been more precise if latest modalities such as USG, CT scan could have been used with larger number of sample size.

Conclusion

Correlation of height was positive with all the splenic measurements in both males and females. Correlation was significant for splenic weight and length in females, significant for splenic thickness in males and significant for total surface area of spleen for both males and females. Spleen morphometric parameters can be further correlated with age using larger number of spleen specimens. The present study would have important applications in forensics and crimes involving homicides.

References

1.
Krishan K. Anthropometry in forensic medicine and forensic science-‘Forensic Anthropometry’. The Internet Journal of Forensic Science. 2006;2(1):95-97. [crossref]
2.
Singh V. Abdominal part of Oesophagus, Stomach and Spleen In: Textbook of Anatomy Abdomen and Lower Limb; Volume II. New Delhi. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2020;106-10.
3.
Crane GM, Liu YC, Chadburn A. Spleen: Development, anatomy and reactive lymphoid proliferations. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2021;38(2):112-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Hamilton WJ. Textbook of Human Anatomy. Springer. 1982;18.
5.
Singh IB. Lymphatics and Lymphoid Tissue. In: Textbook of Human Histology. 3rd ed. New Delhi. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd. 1997; p.181-84.
6.
Gouma E, Simos Y, Verginadis I, Lykoudis E, Evangelou A, Karkabounas S. A simple procedure for estimation of total body surface area and determination of a new value of Meeh’s constant in rats. Lab Anim. 2012;46(1):40-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Demissie S, Mergu P, Fikadu T, Hailu T, Abebe G, Warsa M. Morphometric Assessment of Spleen Dimensions and Its Correlates among Individual Living in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Med Imaging. 2021;21:186. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00719-9. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Gowraiah HL, Machikalapati SR. Correlation between anthropometric parameters and volume, weight and size of normal pancreas, spleen and kidney in adult’s autopsies. Indian Journal of Clinical Anatomy and Physiology. 2019;6(2):216-19. [crossref]
9.
Rayhan KA, Ara S, Nurunnabi AS, Kishwara S, Noor M. Morphometric study of the postmortem human spleen. Journal of Dhaka Medical College. 2011;20(1):32-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Chow KU, Luxembourg B, Seifried E, Bonig H. Spleen size is significantly influenced by body height and sex: Establishment of normal values for spleen size at US with a cohort of 1200 healthy individuals. Radiology. 2016;279(1):306-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Sprogøe-Jakobsen S, Sprogøe-Jakobsen U. The weight of the normal spleen. Forensic Science International. 1997;88(3):215-23. [crossref]
12.
de la Grandmaison GL, Clairand I, Durigon M. Organ weight in 684 adult autopsies: New tables for a Caucasoid population. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;119(2):149-54. [crossref]
13.
Kim YS, Kim DI, Cho SY, Kim MH, Yang KM, Lee HY, et al. Statistical analysis for organ weights in Korean adult autopsies. Korean Journal of Anatomy. 2009;42(4):219-24.
14.
Deland FH. Normal spleen size. Radiology. 1970;97(3):589-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Asghar A, Naaz S, Agrawal D, Sharma PK. Morphometric study of spleen in North Indian adult population: CT Scan image based study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5(5):974-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Spielmann AL, DeLong DM, Kliewer MA. Sonographic evaluation of spleen size in tall healthy athletes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(1):45-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Asghar A, Agrawal D, Yunus SM, Sharma PK, Zaidi SH, Sinha A. Standard splenic volume estimation in north Indian adult population: Using 3d reconstruction of abdominal CT scan images. Anat Res Int. 2011;2011:707325. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Mohtasib RS, Alshamiri K, Jobeir A, Ambu-Saidi FM, Masawi A, Alabdulaziz L, et al. Sonographic measurements for spleen size in healthy Saudi children and correlation with body parameters. Ann Saudi Med. 2021;41(1):14-23. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57201.16506

Date of Submission: Apr 19, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 13, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 26, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 23, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 25, 2022
• iThenticate Software: May 27, 2022 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com