Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 132858

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : November | Volume : 16 | Issue : 11 | Page : NC12 - NC15 Full Version

Ocular Manifestations in Psoriasis Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Centre, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: November 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57397.17139
Lakshmi Sativada, Dineshkanth Vudayana, Dilipchandra Chintada, Kirankanth Vudayana, Ramatulasi Sappa

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, GEMS and H, Ragolu, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, GEMS and H, Ragolu, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL), GEMS and H, Ragolu, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL), GEMS and H, Ragolu, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL), KIMS and RF, Amalapuram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kirankanth Vudayana,
Govinda Nagar, Plot Number 147, Srikakulam-532001, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: kkmedico12@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Psoriasis is known to be proliferative, relapsing inflammatory disorder affecting mainly skin and other parts of body. There are several co-morbidities associated with psoriasis, of which ocular findings go unnoticed.

Aim: To study the spectrum of ocular manifestations in psoriasis patients in Srikakulam, north coastal region of Andhra Pradesh, India and also to identify relationship between frequency of ocular involvement in psoriasis patients with age, gender, type and severity of psoriasis.

Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2019 to March 2021 at Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Ragolu, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. The study included 80 psoriasis patients attending Dermatology Outpatient Department (OPD) to know various ophthalmological manifestations. Detailed dermatological examination was done followed by ophthalmological examination. Clinical types of psoriasis, site of involvement, and the severity of the disease using Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Z test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and linear regression coefficient.

Results: Out of 80 patients with psoriasis, 51 (63.75%) were males and 29 (36.25%) were females. Out of total 80 patients, 56 (70%) patients had ophthalmic manifestations. The mean age of presentation was noted to be 49.22±8.53 years with range from 18-76 years. Most of the patients i.e. 30 (54%) had bilateral manifestations in both the eyes. A total of 10 (18%) of psoriasis patients had multiple ocular manifestations. The p-value was calculated based on PASI score and with ocular manifestations which was found to be 0.0485 and was statistically significant.

Conclusion: Regular screening of psoriasis patients is useful in identification of ocular problems, which may not be noticed by the patients until symptomatic.

Keywords

Dry eyes, Inflammatory disease, Ophthalmological disorder

Psoriasis is a long lasting, immunological assisted, proliferative condition of the skin with both genetic and environmental influences (1). It is a relapsing inflammatory disorder that affects around 0.1-3% of the global population (2). However in India, the prevalence of psoriasis varies from 0.44-2.8% (3). The most characteristic lesions consists of red, scaly, sharply demarcated, indurated plaques present particularly over extensor surfaces and scalp (4). Various morphological types of psoriasis are chronic plaque type, guttate, pustular, erythrodermic (5). There are many co-morbidities associated with psoriasis which are included under extracutaneous manifestations. These manifestations include psoriatic arthritis, metabolic syndrome, Crohn’s disease, depression and cancer. Along with this, there are several ocular manifestations which usually go unnoticed (6).

Many number of ocular findings have been described in psoriasis patients and have been reported to occur in 10% of patients (7). Ocular lesions are more common and they often occur during psoriasis exacerbations (8). Ophthalmic complications of psoriasis are many and tend to occur much later of the skin involvement. The disease affects almost all parts of eye from eyelids, mebomian glands, conjunctiva, cornea, uvea, lens and retina (8).

There were many studies conducted across India and across the world (8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14) to know various ocular manifestations like Shah RD et al., (9) conducted study at Bhubaneswar, Odisha, and Chowdhury B et al., (14) conducted study at Delhi. Till date no such study was done at north coastal region of Andhra Pradesh, India. Hence, present study was conducted in order to know the spectrum of ocular manifestations in psoriasis patients and also to identify relationship between frequency of ocular involvement with age, gender, type and severity of psoriasis in north coastal region of Andhra Pradesh, India.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2019 to March 2021 for a period of two years at Great Eastern Medical School and hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. The study was approved by Institutional Ethical Committee [IEC number 93-IEC-GEMS&H-2019]. Written informed consent was taken from all the participants before inclusion in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged >18 years with diagnosis of psoriasis were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, ocular trauma, ocular allergy, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune or collagen vascular disease like sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Behcet’s disease etc.

Patients with contact lens usage and patients using ophthalmic medications or immunosuppressant drugs were excluded from the study.

A total of 80 patients with psoriasis attending dermatology OPD within the study duration, were enrolled in the present study by convenient sampling.

Study Procedure

After informed consent, detailed clinical dermatological examination were done to confirm the diagnosis of psoriasis by the dermatologist, followed by ophthalmological examination. Clinical types of psoriasis, site of involvement, and the severity of the disease using PASI (15) were noted. This is currently the gold standard score for the assessment of extensive psoriasis. Four sites of affection, head (h), upper limb (u), trunk (t), lower limbs (l), scored by using three parameters: erythema, induration, desquamation each of which is graded on a severity scale of 0 to 4, where 0=nil, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe. The area-wise percentage involvement of the involved sites is calculated as:

• 1=less than 10% area;
• 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%;
• 4=50-69%;
• 5=70-89%; and
• 6=more than 90%.

The final formula for PASI score is:

PASI=0.1 (Eh+Ih+Dh) Ah+0.2 (Eu+Iu+Du) Au+0.3 (Et+It+Dt) At+0.4(El+Il+Dl) Al

E for erythema, I for induration, D for desquamation. The maximum score of PASI is 72

Ophthalmology examination included visual acuity examination using snellens chart (16). Slit-lamp examination include detailed lid examination to rule out blephaitis and mebomitis, conjunctiva examination to rule out conjunctival xerosis, corneal examination to rule out corneal opacities, keratitis and superficial punctate keratitits. Anterior chamber examination was done to rule out active or chronic uveitis changes followed by lens examination to rule out cataract formation. Lacrimal sac syringing was done. Tear film Break-up Time (TBUT) and Schirmer’s l test (17) were done to identify dry eye disease. TBUT score of <10 seconds was found to be abnormal and schrimer’s I <10 mm was found to be abnormal. Applanation tonometry was done to measure intraocular pressure. Fundus examination was done using 90 D lens (9). All the findings were noted.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0 with mean value, Z test, Chi-square test and linear regression coefficient, wherever appropriate. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 80 patients with psoriasis were examined at ophthalmology department to look for various ophthalmological manifestations. Out of total 80 patients 56 (70%) patients had ophthalmic manifestations. Out of 80 patients, with psoriasis, 51 (63.75%) were males and 29 (36.25%) were females. Out of 51 male patients, 39 (76.47%) and out of 29 female patients, 17 (58.62%) had ophthalmic manifestations. The p-value was found to 0.128 which was not significant (Table/Fig 1).

The mean age of presentation was noted to be 49.22±8.53 years with range from 18-76 years. Most of the patients 49 (61.25%) were in the age group of 25-50 years followed by 50-75 years with 25 (31.25%) patients. The p-value was 0.797 which was found to be non significant (Table/Fig 2).

Patients were divided on the basis of type of psoriasis and ocular manifestations. Out of 80 patients, 62 (77.5%) were with plaque type of psoriasis, 11 (13.75%) were with pustular type of psoriasis, 3 (3.75%) each were with eryhtrodermic type of psoriasis and scalp type of psoriasis and 1 (1.25%) were with guttate type of psoriasis (Table/Fig 3).

Patients were divided based on PASI score which indicates the severity of the disease. The p-value was calculated based on PASI score and with ocular manifestations which was found to be 0.0485 and was statistically significant (Table/Fig 4).

Out of 56 patients with psoriasis, 30 (54%) had bilateral manifestations involving both the eye and 26 (46%) had manifestation in one eye. some of the patients i.e 10 (18%) patients had multiple manifestations and 46 (82%) had single manifestation of psoriasis. (Table/Fig 5) shows the different ophthalmic manifestations in psoriasis patients. No other retinal abnormalities or elevated intraocular pressures were found.

In the present study, abnormal TBUT and Schirmer’s I test value were found in 14 patients. The mean TBUT time was found to be 7.2±0.70 seconds and the mean Schrimer’s I test value was found to be 8.5±0.60 mm. TBUT time was lower when compared to Schrimer’s I test. Dry eye patients were divided based on PASI score to find any association between severity of the disease with dry eyes. The p-value was found to be 0.1113 which was not significant (Table/Fig 6).


Linear regression analysis was done for average TBUT value with average PASI score in patients with dry eyes. A correlation between TBUT and PASI score was found and as the severity of the psoriasis increased with the PASI score the dry eye disease also increased as indicated by TBUT values (r-value=0.7658) (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

According to present study, the ocular manifestations were found to be present in 70% patients. The percentage of psoriasis in different studies is shown in (Table/Fig 8) (9),(10),(11),(12).This prevalence rate was more in close with the study conducted by Abbagani S et al., (13) which shows a prevalence rate of 80%. This may be due to geographical variation and less awareness among people and healthcare professionals regarding ophthalmic manifestations in psoriasis patients.

Present study had age group between 18-76 years with mean age of presentation of 49.22±8.53, with higher male preponderance which was in consistent with studies conducted by Campanati A et al., (8), Chandran NS et al., (11) and Abbagani S et al., (13). Bilateral presentation of ocular manifestations was noted in 54% patients, which was found to be similar to study conducted by Kilic B et al., (10) which shows a rate of 58% and 48.6% as per study conducted by Chowdhury B et al., (14).

In the present study, 25% patients had cataract which was more common in elderly person. However none of the studies suggest any direct correlation between disease process and development of cataract (11),(12). Chronic non specific conjunctivitis was found in 15% psoriasis patients. Kaldec R (18) reported only 11 cases out of 90 psoriasis patients which was in consistence with present study. This was found to less when compared to study conducted by Shah RD et al., (9) which shows prevalence of 47% and study conducted by Omar SS and Helaly HA (19) which shows a prevalence of 40%. This may be due to inclusion of non specific conjunctivitis ruling out other causes like blepharitis or dry eye leading to conjunctivitis in present study. In the present study, blepharitis was found in 10% patients and 2 cases (2.5%) were found to be mebomitis. This prevalence was found to be near to study conducted by Kolli SR et al.,(1) and Shah et al., (9) which shows a prevalence of 27%. The prevalence was found to be lower when compared to studies conducted by Kiliac B et al., (10) (39%), Erbagci I et al., (12) (64.5%), Abbagani S et al., (13) (63%) (Table/Fig 9).

The second most common manifestation was dry eye and many studies reported that dry eye disease is associated with severity of psoriasis (14),(20). The incidence of dry eye was found to be 17.5% in the present study which was near to study conducted by Chowdhury B et al., (14) which shows a prevalence of 8.6% [Table/ Fig-10] (1),(9),(10),(12). The incidence was found to be variable from 2% to 18% as study conducted by Gudmundsen KJ et al., (20). The results in the present study were low when compared to study conducted by Shah RD et al., (9) (36%), Kolli SR et al., (1) (37%) and Abbagani S et al., (13) (44.7%). In the present study, lower TBUT time was found when compared to Schrimer’s I as observed by some authors (10),(21). This may be due to decrease in mucin secretion as the disease affects the mebomian glands.

Corneal involvement like SPK, corneal opacities were found secondary to dry eye disease disease or trichiasis. The most common presentation was found to be SPK in 10% patients with psoriasis which was found to be consistent with Shah RD et al., (9) which shows corneal opacities in 9% patients. Erbagci I et al., (12) found corneal opacities in 4 eyes out of 31 psoriasis patients. Total corneal involvement was found to be in 16.25% cases which was found to be consistent with study conducted by Kiliac B et al., (10). Uveitis was found in 1 (1.25%) with unilateral involvement and posterior synechiae. None of the patients, had any elevated intraocular pressure or retina involvement.

Limitation(s)

The present study was conducted at single Institution with a small sample size.

Conclusion

In present study, cataract and dry eye disease were most common opthalamic menifestations among patients with psoriasis. Regular screening of psoriasis patients can be useful in early identification of ocular morbidity. This would be helpful to the patients in early management of the disease and prevention of further complications. As the severity of psoriasis increases, the ocular manifestations also increases which can be reduced by regular screening of patients. Multicentric studies should be done to know the correct correlation between the severity of disease and ocular manifestations.

References

1.
Kolli SR, Boda N, Reddy EA. Ocular manifestations in psoriasis. Nat J Med Dent Res. 2016;4:101-04.
2.
Boehncke WH, Schön MP. Psoriasis. Lancet. 2015;386 (9997):983-94.[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Dogra S, Mahajan R. Psoriasis: Epidemiology, clinical features, co-morbidities, and clinical scoring. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7(6):471-80.[crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Lebwohl M. Psoriasis. Lancet. 2003;361(9364):1197-204. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Nestle FO, Kaplan DH, Barker J. Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):496-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Rehal B, Modjtahedi BS, Morse LS, Schwab IR, Maibach HI. Ocular psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(6):1202-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Horner ME, Abramson AK, Warren RB, Swanson S, Menter MA. The spectrum of oculocutaneous disease Part 1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(5):795.e1-e25. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Campanati A, Neri P, Giuliodori K, Arapi I, Carbonari G, Borioni E, et al. Psoriasis beyond the skin surface: A pilot study on the ocularinvolvement. Int Ophthalmol. 2015;35(3):331-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Shah RD, Satapathy J, Panigrahi PK, Kar BR, Mohapatra RC. Ocular manifestations of psoriasis: A case-control study. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res. 2021;59(2):164-68. [crossref]
10.
Kilic B, Dogan U, Parlak AH, Goksugur N, Polat M, Serin D, et al. Ocular findings in patients with Psoriasis. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(5):554-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Chandran NS, Graves M, Gao F, Lim L, Cheng BCL. Psoriasis and the eye; prevalence of eye disease in Singaporean Asian patients with psoriasis. J Dermatol. 2007;34(12):805-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Erbagci I, Erbagci Z, Gungor K, Bekir N. Ocular anterior segment pathologies and tear film changes in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Acta Med Okayama. 2003;57(6):299-03.
13.
Abbagani S, Kamath YS, Nayak S. A study on ocular morbidity among patients with psoriasis visiting a tertiary care hospital in Karnataka, Southern India. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(4):531-34. Doi: 10.1080/09273948.2017.1414271. Epub 2017 Dec 29. PMID: 29286864. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Chowdhury B, Pavaiya A, Khurana VK. Ocular findings in psoriasis patients. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017;4(10):2075-78.
15.
Langley RG, Ellis CN. Evaluating psoriasis with psoriasis area and severity index, psoriasis global assessment, and lattice system physician’s global assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51(4):563-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Tsui E, Patel P. Calculated decisions: Visual acuity testing (Snellen chart). Emerg Med Pract. 2020;22(4):CD1-CD2.
17.
Tomlinson A, Khanal S, Ramaesh K, Diaper C, McFadyen A. Tear film osmolarity: Determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(10):4309-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Kaldeck R. Ocular psoriasis; clinical review of eleven cases and some comments on treatment. AMA Arch Derm Syphilol.1953; 68(1):44-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Omar SS, Helaly HA. Prevalence of ocular findings in a sample of Egyptian patients with psoriasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2018;84(1):34-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Gudmundsen KJ, O’Donnell BF, Powell FC. Schirmer testing for dry eyes in patients with rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(2 Pt 1):211-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Her Y, Lim JW, Han SH. Dry eye and tear film functions in patients with psoriasis. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013;57(4):341-46. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57397.17139

Date of Submission: May 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Sep 09, 2022
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2022

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 04, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 19, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 30, 2022 (15%)

Etymology: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com