Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 61438

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : November | Volume : 16 | Issue : 11 | Page : OC36 - OC39 Full Version

Aetiology and Clinical Profile of Infectious Causes of Febrile Jaundice at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern Odisha- An Observational Prospective Study


Published: November 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56517.17180
Chaitanya Teja Annam, B Rajendra Prasad Rao, Devasi Manoharlal Bakaramji, Ambika Prasad Mohanty

1. Junior Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ambika Prasad Mohanty,
Campus-5, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
E-mail: ambika.mohanthy1@kims.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: Fever with jaundice is one of the most common presentations seen in both outdoor and indoor patients. This manifestation is seen in many individuals infected with hepatotropic viruses (A to E), bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and non hepatotropic viruses. In viral hepatitis due to hepatotropic viruses the patient presents with a short febrile prodrome followed by jaundice, and is often self-limiting without any treatment whereas in patients other than viral hepatitis the patients present with ongoing fever and jaundice and need specific treatment.

Aim: To evaluate clinical profile of patients presenting with febrile jaundice and finding the infections agent responsible for fever with jaundice baring viral hepatitis (A to E).

Materials and Methods: This observational prospective study included 107 patients admitted in the Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, from September 2019 to August 2021, who were found to have febrile jaundice after initial evaluation, based on liver function tests and hepatotropic viral markers {hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Immunoglobulin M antibody against hepatitis C virus (Anti-HCV IgM), Immunoglobulin M antibody against hepatitis A virus (Anti-HAV IgM), Immunoglobulin M antibody against hepatitis E virus (Anti-HEV IgM)}. Routine laboratory parameters, chest radiograph, and electrocardiogram were performed in all cases. Appropriate investigations like specific serological, radiological investigations and cultures were performed to identify the causal pathogen. Statistical analysis of categorical variables was conducted by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 26.0 version.

Results: Out of 107 patients, 25 (23.3%) patients were found to have scrub typhus. Dengue was found in 23 (21.4%) patients (three had dengue associated with scrub typhus). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was found in 11 patients (10.2%) of study population. Malaria, tuberculosis, S. typhi, K. pneumonia, E. coli, B. cepacia, E. feacalis were isolated in other individuals. Among these, 41.12% patients had associated transaminitis, whereas, 16 had elevated aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase (>3 times of ULN). Overall, 18.4% patients had hepatomegaly, and 6.5% were found to have splenomegaly. Eight patients had septic shock, and associated Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) was seen in six patients. No definitive aetiology was found in 25 patients.

Conclusion: The study identified a variety of organisms in sera from the patients presenting with febrile jaundice. The most common clinical feature was anorexia followed by headache. The common aetiology for febrile jaundice was viral infections {barring viral hepatitis (A to E)} followed by bacterial Infections.

Keywords

Coronavirus disease 2019, Dengue, Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, Scrub typhus, Septic shock

Febrile jaundice is a common entity seen in routine practice. Infectious and non infectious conditions are responsible for this. In most cases, patients come with a brief febrile sickness and jaundice. Patients may be fully ignorant that they have a condition known as jaundice, which is observed by family members and physicians. Patients with fever and jaundice or with abnormal liver functions should be subjected to a thorough history, physical examination, and detailed investigations before any treatment is given. This is done to rule out any additional symptoms, such as pain or other systemic manifestations, which might often point to a different diagnosis. If a patient has a persistent fever and jaundice, it is important to screen out various possibilities responsible for this presentation.

Infectious causes can be parasitic (malaria, toxoplasmosis, schistosomiasis) bacterial (typhoid, typhus, borreliosis, leptospirosis), and viral infections (hepatitis, dengue, covid, lassa, ebola, mums, measles, rubella) (1). Non infectious aetiology mostly includes malignancies, drugs, and connective tissue diseases. Febrile jaundice could be caused by the release of pyrogenic material and haemoglobin into the circulation as a result of haemolysis or cholestasis, along with obstruction in biliary secretion (2),(3),(4),(5). Bilirubin metabolism is divided into three phases: prehepatic, intrahepatic, and posthepatic. Jaundice can occur if any of these phases are disrupted (6).

Studies have found that viral hepatitis (A to E) is the most common infection causing febrile jaundice (7),(8),(9). But the present study was undertaken with the objective to exclusively evaluate infections causing febrile jaundice, barring viral hepatitis, in hospitalised patients and to analyse their clinical features. Identifying the aetiological organism needs a comprehensive and planned analysis by taking aid of clinical features and needed investigations which helps in reducing the financial burden to patient. These cases need specified armamentarium, such as, Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) analysis for evaluating viral organisms and various serological markers specific to the infectious agent, which are scarce in primary and secondary centres. Besides this many patients infected with viruses may get recovered and discharged within a week or few more days before the aetiology is identified. The study also aims to help clinicians in better assessment of such patients, and help in epidemiologic surveillance.

Material and Methods

An observational prospective study was carried out in the Department of General Medicine at Kalinga Institute of Medical Science, Bhubaneswar, Odisha during September 2019 to August 2021. The ethical approval was obtained from Institutional Ethical Committee (KIMS/IEC/121/2019) before sample collection. The desired minimum sample size of 101 was calculated based on the prevalence (2.76 per 1000 population) and at 95% CI (10).

Inclusion criteria: A total of 107 hospital-admitted patients of age more than 18 years with fever and clinical jaundice or serum bilirubin greater than 1.5 mg/dL with or without Aspartate Transaminase (AST) and Alanine Transaminase (ALT) elevation were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with only viral hepatitis (Ato E) and non infectious causes of febrile jaundice were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Demographic profile: Demographic features like age, sex, onset and duration of fever of all 107 patients were recorded.

Clinical parameters: Clinical signs and symptoms like fever, icterus, rashes, headache, myalgia, shortness of breath, pain abdomen, seizures, vomiting, altered bowel habits, altered mental status and focal neurological deficit were noted with a history of present and past illness like diabetes, hypertension, tuberculosis, immunodeficient states, family history, drug and food allergies and any prior antibiotic treatment.

Sample collection and pathogen identification for febrile jaundice: Serum samples were collected for clinical investigations such as complete blood count, peripheral blood smear, urine routine examination and microscopy, Typhidot-IgM, malarial parasite immunochromatographic test, Scrub typhus- IgM, Dengue-NS1 antigen and IgM, Leptospira- Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT), blood culture, specific viral markers. Appropriate laboratory technique was used to identify each pathogen. Chest X-ray (posteroanterior view), ultrasound imaging of liver and spleen, bone marrow examination in suspected haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis cases were obtained in all the cases. Fundoscopy was done in needed cases who presented with headache, altered sensorium and signs of meningeal irritation and the findings were noted. Lumbar puncture was done only after excluding the contraindications in needed cases. Tests of liver function, Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBsAg), IgM anti-HCV, IgM Anti-HAV, Anti-HEV IgM were done to rule out viral hepatitis, and to determine the serum bilirubin levels of patients. Evidence of infection, aetiology, clinical features, and outcome of febrile jaundice were analysed in 107 patients.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of categorical variables was conducted by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 26.0 version. All the data are presented in the form of mean, standard deviation and percentage. One sample T-test was implemented to calculate the p-value. A p-value <0.05 was obtained which is considered to be statistically significant.

Results

All the admitted patients were in the range of 18-87 years with mean age of 47.03±17.38 years. Maximum patients 38 (35.5%) belonged to the age group of 41-60 years (Table/Fig 1), overall, 82.3% were males. Pain abdomen was the most common symptom which was seen in 21.4% of the study population. Associated myalgia was seen in 23.3%, whereas Icterus was seen in 12.1% (Table/Fig 2). Overall, 18.4% of the population presented with hepatomegaly, 6.5% presented with splenomegaly, and hepatosplenomegaly was seen in 3.7% and encephalopathy was seen in 5.6% patients. Other than hepatitis A to E, infectious agents like viral, bacterial, fungal organisms, parasites were identified in the study population. Predominance pathogens identified were scrub typhus 25 (23.3%), dengue 23 (21.4%), Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 11 (10.2%). Other organisms such as malaria, tuberculosis, Salmonella, E. coli and Varicella were also detected (Table/Fig 3).

Among the study sample, the majority of the patients had a viral aetiology (n=42), followed by bacterial aetiology (n=41). Among the viral aetiology, dengue was the most common viral organism responsible for febrile jaundice. There were few patients infected with hepatotropic viruses, while few had associated infections which include malaria and scrub typhus. Similarly, few patients infected with scrub typhus had co-infection with malaria and dengue (Table/Fig 3).

Thrombocytopaenia was one of the major findings with majority of the cases infected with viruses. It was observed in 29 patients. Mean serum bilirubin value was 4.44±5.77 mg/dL. Associated transaminitis (AST or ALT elevation) was seen in 44 (41.12%), and among these 44, 16 patients had elevated level above three times the upper limit of normal value. The mean Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) was 342.28±863.5, with the highest value 7550 and the lowest of 26. The mean Alanine Transaminase (ALT) was 237.7±552.812 with the highest 4258 and the lowest 19 (Table/Fig 4). Deranged Prothrombin Time and International Normalised Ratio (PT INR) and hypoalbuminaemia was found in four and three patients, respectively, among the study population. Total four patients died- three with COVID-19, and one succumbed to dengue.

Discussion

In febrile jaundice, jaundice is the initial symptom followed by fever. Infectious and non infectious conditions such as hepatotoxic drugs are responsible for this presentation. In this study, viral aetiology was the most common cause of febrile jaundice, though hepatotropic viruses were excluded in this study. This was followed by bacteria and parasites. Dengue virus was responsible to cause febrile jaundice due to hepatopathy in (20.2%) of the cases. Similar studies found that dengue is responsible for transaminitis and elevated bilirubin due to inflammatory process in the liver parenchyma (11),(12),(13).

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was also responsible for the presentation of febrile jaundice in 10%. Majority of this group initially presented with fever followed by jaundice. Studies found that COVID-19 infection is associated with hepatopathy, leading to elevated bilirubin and transaminases. The virus binds to the target hepatocytes through Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2). Because ACE2 is expressed abundantly in the liver hepatocytes and in biliary epithelial cells, the liver is a potential target for direct infection. Hypoxic hepatitis as a result of anoxia seen in severe SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals augments hepatopathy (14),(15). Previous studies are tabulated (Table/Fig 5) (7),(11),(12),(13),(15),(16),(17).

Bacterial infection also caused febrile jaundice in the present study population. In majority of the patients, the causal bacterial organism responsible for infection was scrub typhus. The mechanism of hepatic impairment caused by scrub typhus is unknown so far. It might be direct invasion of Orientia tsutsugamushi and that cellular immunity may be attributed to pathogenesis of hepatic injury (16). Biochemical analysis shows elevation in transaminases apart from elevated bilirubin. Associated thrombocytopaenia was seen in majority of patients infected with dengue and scrub typhus. This is similar to the findings of Souza L et al., (18). In the present study, mortality rate was high in COVID-19 infection with sepsis and MODS, followed by dengue infection. Jäger B et al., also found that hypoxic hepatopathy in COVID-19 which leads to jaundice and other complications and even mortality (19).

Limitation(s)

As it was hospital-based, the incidence of febrile jaundice might have been under-estimated. Patients with both jaundice and raised transaminases were included, however, raised bilirubin and transaminases can reflect pathology in other organs, potentially confounding the results. Anti-HAV IgM, conventionally considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of acute HAV, and it persists for 3 months to 5 years. Though patients with viral hepatitis A were excluded in this study, an important diagnostic problem for identification of Hepatitis A is that, HAV IgM can result from non specific polyclonal activation of memory cells and positive results not reflecting acute HAV infection may be more common than previously appreciated. It can be challenging to explain and interpret apparent mixed infections, having clinically similar symptoms particularly when the basis for interpretation of these infections is made according to serology. The apparent mixed infections with hepatitis A may lead to false positive reports of acute hepatitis A given the challenges in diagnosing this condition. Some patients who are infected with both leptospirosis and typhus and some being infected with dengue and typhus as well, having antibody persistence are examples of serial infections which are mostly seen in tropics and endemic regions confined to those infections. These type of mixed infections could be genuine mixed infections though some may represent false positivity. To elucidate the relative prevalence of these theories in the tropics, more investigation is needed utilising culture reports, genetic assays and antigen tests (8). Also, paediatric population was not included in this study which may have a modest impact on the results.

Conclusion

The incidence of possible bacterial, viral, and other infections and complications caused by the pathogens causing febrile jaundice is shown in this study. This study also outlines the endemic infections responsible for febrile jaundice, providing a baseline for physicians for better evaluation and management as well as assisting in epidemiological surveillance. Early evaluation and identification of the causative organism, as well as treatment, has a significant impact in the ultimate outcome and aids in the prevention of complications, as well as the reduction of mortality and morbidity.

References

1.
Gadia CLB, Manirakiza A, Tekpa G, Konamna X, Vickos U, Nakoune E, et al. Identification of pathogens for differential diagnosis of fever with jaundice in the Central African Republic: A retrospective assessment, 2008-2010. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):735. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Chung JP, Kim KW, Chi HS, Lee SI, Shin ET, Cho JH, et al. Obstructive jaundice due to compression of the common hepatic duct by right hepatic artery-A case associated with the absence of the lateral segment of the left hepatic lobe. Yonsei Med J. 1994;35(2):231-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Chang K, Yan JJ, Lee HC, Liu KH, Lee NY, Ko WC, et al. Acute hepatitis with or without jaundice: A predominant presentation of acute Q fever in southern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2004;37(2):103-08.
4.
Shah S, Ali L, Sattar RA, Aziz T, Ansari T, Ara J, et al. Malarial hepatopathy in falciparum malaria. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009;19(6):367-70.
5.
L’Azou M, Succo T, Kamagaté M, Ouattara A, Gilbernair E, Adjogoua E, et al. Dengue: Aetiology of acute febrile illness in Abidjan, CĂ´te d’Ivoire, in 2011-2012. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015;109(11):717-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Singh V, Bhalla A. Update on tropical fever. Association of physicians of India. 2015;25-40.
7.
Vasanthan K, Manikantan S, Vengadakrishnan K, Rajkumar M, Senthil N. Febrile jaundice in a tertiary care center: A prospective study. Int J Sci Stud. 2016;4(9):108-10.
8.
Syhavong B, Rasachack B, Smythe L, Rolain JM, Roque-Afonso AM, Jenjaroen K, et al. The infective causes of hepatitis and jaundice amongst hospitalised patients in Vientiane, Laos. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010;104(7):475-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Makiala-Mandanda S, Le Gal F, Ngwaka-Matsung N, Ahuka-Mundeke S, Onanga R, Bivigou-Mboumba B, et al. High prevalence and diversity of hepatitis viruses in suspected cases of yellow fever in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(5):1299-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Singh J, Prakash C, Gupta RS, Bora D, Jain DC, Datta KK, et al. Epidemiology of endemic viral hepatitis in an urban area of India: A retrospective community study in Alwar. Bull World Health Organ. 1997;75(5):463-68.
11.
Yudhishdran J, Navinan R, Ratnatilaka A, Jeyalakshmy S. Dengue haemorrhagic fever presenting with cholestatic hepatitis: Two case reports and a review of literature. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):568. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Lee LK, Gan VC, Lee VJ, Tan AS, Leo YS, Lye DC, et al. Clinical relevance and discriminatory value of elevated liver aminotransferase levels for dengue severity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1676. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Samanta J, Sharma V. Dengue and its effects on liver. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(2):125-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Sun J, Aghemo A, Forner A, Valenti L. COVID-19 and liver disease. Liver Int. 2020;40(6):1278-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Paliogiannis P, Zinellu A. Bilirubin levels in patients with mild and severe Covid-19: A pooled analysis. Liver Int. 2020;40(7):1787-88. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/liv.14477. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Mokta J, Yadav R, Mokta K, Panda P, Ranjan A. Scrub typhus- The most common cause of febrile jaundice in a tertiary care hospital of Himalayan state. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65(8):47-50.
17.
Zhang Y, Ye F, Xia LX, Zhu LW, Kamara IL, Huang KQ, et al. Next-generation sequencing study of pathogens in serum from patients with febrile jaundice in Sierra Leone. Biomed Environ Sci. 2019;32(5):363-70.
18.
Souza L, Carneiro H, Souto Filho J, Souza T, CĂ´rtes V, Gicovate Neto C, et al. Hepatitis in dengue shock syndrome. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002;6(6):322-27. [crossref]
19.
Jäger B, Drolz A, Michl B, Schellongowski P, Bojic A, Nikfardjam M, et al. Jaundice increases the rate of complications and one-year mortality in patients with hypoxic hepatitis. Hepatology. 2012;56(6):2297-04. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56517.17180

Date of Submission: Mar 23, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Apr 29, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Sep 22, 2022
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 02, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 16, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Sep 15, 2022 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com