Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 85498

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : BC01 - BC05 Full Version

An Interventional Study on the Impact of Pictorial Primed Lecture Session towards the Performance at Lower and Higher Cognitive Domain Levels among 1st Year Medical Undergraduates


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/53110.15857
K Gunanithi, S Sakthidasan

1. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research [Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Chennai], Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research [Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Chennai], Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. K Gunanithi,
104, Malligai Block, Invicon SSP Flats, Krishna Nagar, 6th Street, West Tambaram,
Chennai-600045, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: gunamededu@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Lectures play a major role in teaching large group of learners in a medical institution. Priming involves familiarising students with background information on the cognitive content just before its actual delivery during lecture sessions. Considering the monotonous textual lectures of present day medical education, there is always a need for making the lecture sessions interactive at the same time improving the performance of the learners at the cognitive level.

Aim: To assess the performance of 1st year medical undergraduates at lower and higher cognitive domain levels after pictorial concept priming before lecture session.

Materials and Methods: The present study was an educational interventional study and a prospective cohort design, the study was conducted during March to April 2019 in Department of Biochemistry, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences (MAPIMS) Tamil Nadu, India, as a part of Advance Course in Medical Education (ACME) 2018B Project work. With sample size suggestion made using universal sampling techniques, 120 Phase I medical undergraduates of both sexes aged 17-21 years were enrolled into the study who were divided into two groups, randomised, cohort-60 and control-60 students. The lecture delivery was on glycolysis pathway for both groups with cohort alone being primed using standardised polygonal pictorial concepts during priming session before lectures. Cognitive performance assessment after lecture being made using validated Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) questionnaire which included five lower cognitive level questions at recalling aspects and five higher cognitive level questions at creating aspects and total attainable cognitive performance score at 10. Scores obtained were tabulated and statistical analysis was done using Independent sample t-test for mean score comparisons and relative risk estimation at lower and higher cognitive domain levels using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 18.0.

Results: The results of the present study showed that cohort group who were primed with pictorial concepts had significantly higher mean score at total cognitive performance score (7.03±1.37) than the control group (6.15±1.83) at (t=-2.98, p=0.003) and significantly higher mean score at higher cognitive performance score (3.75±1.14) than the control group (3.20±1.33) at (t=-2.42, p=0.01) who were not primed with pictorial concepts. However, the results obtained at the lower cognitive performance scores which although shows a higher score among cohort group with mean value (3.28±1.09) when compared to control group with mean value (2.95±1.01), the mean difference obtained remains insignificant (t=-1.73, p=0.08). Exposure outcome relative risk estimation on priming exposure to outcome (50% total cognitive score) showed primed group which is RR=1.567 (0.895-2.744).

Conclusion: The study concludes that priming sessions using pictures have a significant impact on improving the cognitive performance of the learners when delivered during lecture sessions in a medical college. Adding to the conclusion, the impact of the pictorial priming sessions is even more on the higher level cognitive performance, which includes evaluating and creating aspects of the knowledge domain. This reiterates the role of the importance of dual added benefits of pictures and priming during teaching cognitive domain aspects of lecture sessions in medical institutions.

Keywords

Blooms taxonomy, Image based learning, Large group teaching, Learning domains

Lectures play a major role in teaching large group of learners in a medical institution. It has stood the test of times since its inception years ago, even till today. Though, there are merits on the part of lectures in imparting knowledge domain, so are the limitations of the conventional lectures which deliver monotonous textual contents making the learners disinterested during sessions. This surely affects the cognitive performance level of the learners (1). The short attention span of a lecture session is an important factor in having an impact on the performance of the learners. The average attention time for a lecture is around 10-15 minutes while the average lectures session in medical schools clock at 45 minutes. Logically, two thirds of the lecture session times are not attentive for learner community on the whole. So, there is always a need for making the lecture sessions interactive at the same time improving the performance of the learners at the cognitive level, especially at the higher levels of cognitive domain (2).

Priming involves familiarising students with background information on the cognitive content before its actual delivery during lecture sessions. Many experts have noted that priming improves the performance of the students in learning. Furthermore, memory for pictures may be better than for words in priming (3). The study design is to test, the null hypothesis statement that priming using picture concepts before a lecture session has no impact on the performance of learners at different cognitive levels. Though, lectures are an ideal teaching learning method for imparting cognitive content, there is a constant need for increasing attention span of lecture sessions, for performance improvement of learners at higher cognitive levels, for overcoming the difficulties in learning pathways and conceptual understanding of chemical structures in biochemistry during lecture sessions (4). But there is a lack of educational studies on priming during lecture sessions in medical education literature which paves the need for the present study.

In a medical school, 1st year medical undergraduates are the most vulnerable population who are on the cross roads of transition from general school learning to medical college learning. This process of transition needs a lot of attention in improving the teaching learning methods making it interactive and at the same time improving their performance outcomes. Subjects like biochemistry which are an intrinsic part of 1st year undergraduate curriculum is full of structures and pathways which are not only difficult to learn but even more difficult to comprehend, which double burdens the 1st year medical undergraduate's transitional phase. The justification of the need to include only phase I students lies in the participant appropriateness for the content like biochemistry, avoidance of content bias and observer bias if many phases are involved along with avoidance of repetition bias and response bias as other phase medical graduates might already be aware of the content knowledge. The present study will also further the knowledge on the medical graduate's transition phase learning which is a bottleneck moment that not only decides the future of the professional but also the fate of the patient community on the whole. So, the study was aimed at assessing the performance of 1st year medical undergraduates at lower and higher cognitive domain levels after pictorial concept priming before lecture session.

Material and Methods

An educational interventional study and a prospective cohort design, the study was conducted under the project requirement of ACME 2018B batch Project work under Medical Council of India (MCI) nodal center, National Faculty Development Programme, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) approval was obtained before actual conduct of the study {Ref No.:MAPIMS/IEC/52/2019/ 113(02)2019}. The period of study was during March-April 2019 in Department of Biochemistry, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India. Informed consent was obtained from all learner participants before the conduct of the study.

Sample size: Considering the lack of prior similar studies, the sample size for the study was suggested by the institutional statistician using universal sampling techniques with a minimum sample size of 30.

Inclusion criteria: The eligibility criteria for both the cohort and control group were Phase I medical undergraduates. Both the groups being age and sex matched.

Exclusion criteria: Student not welling to participate in the study were excluded.

Study Procedure

Out of the eligible, 150 Phase I medical undergraduates, the total number of study participants enrolled into the study included 120 Phase I medical undergraduate students of the medical college. The participants were divided into two groups, randomised, cohort-60 and control-60 students of both sexes aged 17-21 years.

Lecture content preparation and delivery: The lecture delivery for the both the groups were on the topic of glycolysis pathway on the same day by the same lecturer (5). The lecture delivery for the control group was done using only the standardised textual content of the topic detailing the steps of the glycolysis pathway by conventional powerpoint presentations using standardised textual contents with total duration of the lecture approximately 30 minutes. The lecture delivery for the cohort group was primed with standardised polygonal pictorial concepts (pictured reasoning of steps) as illustrated in (Table/Fig 1) followed by the standardised textual content of the topic detailing the steps of the glycolysis pathway using same conventional powerpoint presentations with total duration of the lecture approximately 45 minutes (with priming session close to 15 minutes) (6). The only difference being the session using pictorial concepts as a priming to the lecture for the cohort group and not for the control group.

Questionnaire validation: The performance assessment method of the cognitive domain levels for both the control and cohort groups were done immediately after the content delivery (2). MCQ were selected as the assessment method with questions being prepared using standard contents (5). The questionnaire was validated for the content appropriateness using validity framework by Thomsen AS et al., for the relevance of the test content to different cognitive domain aspects by five individual subject experts of the institution on a scale (0-Irrelevant to 5-Highly relevant) which was assessed by reliability analysis for relevance using cronbach's alpha= 0.872 {95% C.I (0.602-0.985)} before being presented for assessment (7).

Assessment: The validated MCQ selected for the performance assessment included 10 questions in total at two different levels (Five lower cognitive level questions were at recalling and understanding level of cognitive domain of revised blooms taxonomy) and (Five higher cognitive level questions were at evaluating and creating level of cognitive domain of revised blooms taxonomy) related to the lecture delivered on glycolysis pathway. The learners from both the groups were given the validated MCQ Questionnaire at the end of their sessions with total duration of performance assessment at 15 minutes. The performance of the learners were assessed manually by the investigators with total attainable lower level cognitive score at 5, total attainable higher level cognitive score at 5, and total attainable overall cognitive score at 10.

Statistical Analysis

The scores of all the participants including both the control and the cohort group were tabulated in SPSS file and the statistical analysis was done by Independent sample t-test as test of significance for mean difference at the lower cognitive level score, higher cognitive level score and total cognitive score and relative risk ratio estimation by cross tabs using SPSS software version 18.0.

Results

The baseline demographic characteristics of both the groups (cases and controls) which includes age (years), sex {N(%)}, Male:Female ratio along with test statistics and p-value (as applicable) are described in (Table/Fig 2). There was no statistically significant difference noted among the demographics (age, sex) between the two groups.

The mean score comparisons of both the groups (at the lower cognitive level, at the higher cognitive level, and at the total score) is shown in (Table/Fig 3) and illustrated for visual comparison with colour codes in the [Table-Fig-4] as box plot comparison.

The mean score comparisons of both the groups at the individual lower and higher cognitive domain level (Recalling, understanding, evaluating, creating) scores is shown in (Table/Fig 5) and illustrated for visual comparison with colour codes in the [Table-Fig-6] as box plot comparison.

Exposure outcome association on priming exposure to outcome (50% total cognitive score) between the two groups (control and primed cohort group) is illustrated in (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

Among the three learning domains (2), the cognitive domain plays a major role in medical education. It helps in attaining the goal of competency based medical education curriculum, which ultimately creates a fully competent Indian medical graduate to serve the patient community. Blooms taxonomy of cognitive domain levels underwent a change by Anderson et al., which is still followed (2). There are six levels in the cognitive pyramid which includes remembering and understanding at the base (lower cognitive level), applying and analysing at the middle, evaluating and creating at the top (higher cognitive level) of the cognitive pyramid [Table-Fig-8].

As there is always a constant need for the present medical graduate to perform well at the cognitive domain, so is the importance towards their performance at the higher levels, which the present study has addressed and thereby helps in determining their competent abilities in being an independent physician in future.

Priming introduces the content to the learner before actual process of learning (8). It acts as a facilitating zone for the learners as a preparation towards learning experience which has the ability to reduce the content difficulty levels (9). It reduces anxiety towards learning the content from the learner's point of view, which helps in smooth and gradual transition to learning the content. Though, zpriming might appear to have some repetitiveness of the content, this repetition also helps in consolidating the learned content to the permanent memory, which has the potential to increase the performance of the learner both at the lower and higher cognitive level.

The results of the present study showed that cohort group who were primed with pictorial concepts had significantly higher mean score at total cognitive performance score (7.03±1.37) than the control group (6.15±1.83) at (t=-2.98, p=0.003) who were not primed with pictorial concepts. The study results showed a significant mean difference between the two groups at the total cognitive level scores highlights the importance of priming during lecture sessions. Though, there are studies which shows that priming was not demonstrated to be a statistically superior educational method (10), the present study was in line with few convincing educational literature studies like Rathore BB et al., which showed the mean marks scored by primed students were significantly higher than unprimed students (p=0.0037) (11). The hypothesis behind priming improving cognitive performances is supported by studies like Martin A and Chao LL, and Bargh JA et al., (12),(13). Martin A and Chao LL, suggest the organisation of brain networks based on associations with prior experiences by priming (12). Bargh JA et al., suggests the role of visualising subconscious goal achievement in working memory towards performance improvement (13).

Pictures play a major part of visual learning in the present medical education, especially in today's technologically driven society. But on the contrary, most of the lectures in today's educational atmosphere is mostly of the oral and text content, especially in medical schools and so are the use of pictures which are underexplored by teaching professionals as suggested by Buckley CA and Waring J (14). Pictures are an effective way of presenting the multistep process into a single image which drives off the apprehension towards learning the difficult contents. It shows modest improvement in content comprehension as suggested by Schrader PG (15). Pictures add value when presented with the relevant content for the learners as suggested by Carney RN and Levin JR and has the potential to link with the learning objectives (16). Banks M suggested the absolute need of independent visual presentation rather than text contents (17). Furthermore, use of images along with textual content rather than text only presentations which provides a multimedia approach to teaching learning method and provokes learner's interest. The juxta posing of image with textual content removes the redundancy of linear thought process and helps in thought organisation and creativity as proposed by Kinchin IM (18). On the flipside, the use of images can divert attention from the content unless the images prove to be absolutely relevant in conveying the content delivery. So, the use of pictures in priming should be carefully selected from the tutor's point of view whose academic compentency in creating and using images matters a lot.

The scores obtained from the participants of the present study showing the significant cognitive performance improvement of learners, and more so on the higher cognitive aspects with mean value of cohort group (3.75±1.14) being significantly greater than the control group (3.20±1.33) at (t=-2.42, p=0.01) reiterates the importance of use of pictures in medical teaching practice for improving the learner performance that are presented during priming models. The highlight of the present study is the significance attained at the higher cognitive level scores (p<0.05) than at the lower cognitive level scores (p>0.05), which suggests a significant positive impact on the learning pathway that additionally confirms the importance of pictures in evaluating and creating aspects of knowledge domain, which is further substantiated by studies like Smilek D which suggests that pictures adds additional improvement in cognitive performance (19).

However, the results obtained at the lower cognitive performance scores which although shows a higher score among cohort group with mean value (3.28±1.09) when compared to control group with mean value (2.95±1.01), the mean difference obtained remains insignificant (t=-1.73, p=0.08). The prior knowledge of the learner's content would have masked the effects of the significance, which the study did not accounted for and moreover the recalling and evaluating aspects of lower and higher cognitive domain levels needs more textual repetition rather than concepting through pictures. This does not undermine the importance of pictures in critical anslysis and creativity aspects of the knowledge domain which plays a pivotal role in a medical graduate career.

On intricate analysis of the present study at the individual cognitive domain levels, the results showed a higher significant scores at understanding (1.8± 0.725 vs 1.53±0.791) and creating (2.15±0.777 vs 1.62±0.976) levels for primed cohort group (p=0.043, p=0.001)respectively when compared to control group. While at the recalling level (1.47±0.65 vs 1.43±0.563) and evaluating level (1.60±0.588 vs 1.58±0.561) the scores for primed group were higher without any significance (p=0.765,p=0.874) respectively when compared to controls. In general, the participants performed better at higher domain levels of both the lower and higher cognitive pyramids.This is supported by studies like Padilla LM et al., which confirms the cognitive creative decision making capabilities being supported by visualisations that which undermines the performance at the understanding and creating domain levels (20). Adding to the results, the exposure outcome association on priming exposure to outcome (50% total cognitive score) which showed a higher outcome numbers (51:9) in primed group when compared to non primed group (43:17) and the relative risk estimate of primed group (RR>1) is R=1.567 (0.895-2.744), which translates to the primed group getting a 50% total cognitive score stands at 1.567 times (56% increase) more when compared to non primed group. While the relative risk of non primed group (RR<1) is R=0.700 (0.490-0.999) which translates to the non primed group getting a 50% total cognitive score stands at 0.700 times (30% decrease) less when compared to primed group. This further substantiates the role of priming and pictures in dual added advantage to cognitive performance improvement.

On a caution note, the performance assessment done for the present study was formative type. The assessment being done on the same day which is surely an impact mostly on the immediate type of memory has both benefits and limitations. The benefits being the direct outcome measure of the session without being influenced by additional referential learning from textbooks or other references and avoidance of peer influence bias. The other benefits include avoidance of memory fades which is a possibility in case of delayed summative type assessment. The limitations includes the inability to assess consolidated memory, where time duration is a major factor and a prime need for passing on the summative type assessments. Yet, the assessment in the present study is a reflection of providing a strong basement towards the final examination phases. Furthermore, the present study focused on only the concept of glycolysis, a breakdown pathway of glucose in the subject of biochemistry. Since the contents are appropriate for only the sample population like phase I medical undergraduates, the present study does not account for other phase medical undergraduates who might need possibly different contents at different levels which would end up in content bias and moreover the same content can be assessed using different level of questioning which would end up in question related bias. In view of avoidance of these bias one concept one sample method is based in the present study. The present study method on one concept is possibly a model template for other different concepts in different streams of medicine.

Apart from this, several possible bias areas in the present study includes the content bias, content delivery bias, question bias, response bias, repeat bias, peer influence bias, parallel and after learning bias. The content bias is accounted by selection of appropriate contents (biochemistry) for the particular phase (Phase I Medical Undergraduates) and by avoiding other phase medical graduates from inclusion into the study. This further accounts for the response bias and repeat bias as other phase medical undergraduates have already learnt the content during their previous years of learning. The content delivery bias was eliminated by involving the same lecturer and same method of delivery as per study protocol. Question bias was accounted by changing the order of question numbers to be answered by the participants. The peer influence bias, parallel learning and after learning bias was accounted by the assessment being conducted immediately after the content delivery as it avoids time delay and referential additional learning that might influence the content acquisition. The limitation of not being able to compute sample size for the present study is accounted by trying to involve the whole population of the institution. It is further superseeded by the delicate and intricate detailing into the bias considerations which is boosted by the use of randomisation, standardised and validated contents and validated assessment techniques.

To summarise, the present study not only supports the dual coding theory which proposes the role of pictures in addition to texts for improving the learning process, it also emphasises the sequence to dual coding with picture codes as priming to be followed by textual codes. It further confirms the benefits of different loops of memory pathways being activated through different modes leaving memory traces, which surely can have impact towards cognitive performance improvement.

Limitation(s)

The study was not followed-up by crossing over of learners between the groups which would have summed up the justifications resulted from the study. Technical limitations includes pictorial misidentification of the contents was a practical possibility as the polygon model used were not the routine learning way used in conventional lectures. Multipronged assessment would have added meaning to the higher cognitive level performance than with MCQs alone. Statistical limitations include the lack of appropriate sample size calculation considering the lack of previous literature studies and considering a large sample size of similar phase studies needs multi-institutional participation which found hurdles at various levels. And above all, the participants of the study were only phase I medical undergraduates, the inclusion of the learners from other phases would have given an overall picture among medical learner community on the whole.

Conclusion

The study concludes that priming sessions using pictures have a significant impact on improving the cognitive performance of the learners when delivered during lecture sessions in a medical college. Adding to the conclusion, the impact of the pictorial priming sessions is even more on the higher level cognitive performance, which includes, evaluating and creating aspects of the knowledge domain. This reiterates the role of the importance of dual added benefits of pictures and priming during teaching cognitive domain aspects of lecture sessions. Yet what is intriguing is the insignificance obtained in the present study at the remembering and recalling aspects of the lower cognitive domain levels which carves the road for future discussions and elaborate learner research studies on a large population in finding the role of picture priming as a part of performance improvement in medical schools.

References

1.
Bradbury NA. Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes or more. Advances in Physiology Education. 2016;40(4):509-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Anderson, Lorin W, David R, Krathwohl, Benjamin Samuel Bloom. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing:A Revision of Bloom's taxonomy of Educational objectives. 17#sup#th?sup? Edition. New York: Longman, 2001.
3.
Norris EM. The constructive use of images in medical teaching: A literature review. J R Soc Med Sh Rep. 2012;3(1):33. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Taskin V, Bernholt S. Students' understanding of chemical formulae: A review of empirical research. Int J Sci Educ. 2014;3(6):157-85. [crossref]
5.
Nelson, CoxDL, Glycolysis MM. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. WH Freeman. New York. 6th edition, 2013;14:543-63.
6.
Bonafe CFS, Bispo JAC, de Jesus MB. The polygonal model- A simple representation of biomolecules as a tool for teaching metabolism. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2017;46(1):66-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Thomsen AS, Subhi Y, Kiilgaard JF, la Cour M, Konge L. Update on simulation based surgical training and assessment in ophthalmology: A systematic review. Ophthalmolog. 2015;122(6):1111-30e.1. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Cook A. Priming as a teaching strategy. Cl Int for students. 2016;4:6-43.
9.
Stuart E, Hanson JL, Dudas RA. The right stuff: Priming students to focus on pertinent information during clinical encounters. Pediatrics. 2019;144(1):20191311. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Rose E, Jhun P, Baluzy M, Hauck A, Huang J, Wagner J, et al. Flipping the classroom in medical student education: Does priming work. West J Emerg Med. 2018;19(1):93-100. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Rathore BB, Mehta B, Singh S. Implementation and evaluation of priming as a teaching-learning tool for enhancing physiology learning among medical undergraduates. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2019;63(1):37-41.
12.
Martin A, Chao LL. Semantic memory and the brain. Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2001;11(2):194-201. [crossref]
13.
Bargh JA, Lee-Chai A, BarndollarK, Gollwitzer PM, Trötsche lR. The automated will: Non conscious activation and pursuit of behavioural goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;81(6):1014-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Buckley CA, Waring J. Using diagrams to support the research process: Examples from grounded theory. Qualitative Research. 2013;13(2):148-72. [crossref]
15.
Schrader PG. Does multimedia theory apply to all students? The impact of multimedia presentations on science learning. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age. 2016;1:32-46.
16.
Carney RN, Levin JR. Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review. 2002;14(1):05-26. [crossref]
17.
Banks M. Visual methods for social research. American Journal of Qualitative Research. 2018;2(2):143-44.
18.
Kinchin IM. Visualising powerful knowledge to develop the expert student. Sense publishers. Rotterdam. 2016;2:15-34. [crossref]
19.
Smilek D. Synesthetic colour experiences influence memory. Psychol Sci. 2002;13(6):548-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Padilla LM, Creem-Regehr SH, Hegarty M, Stefanucci JK. Decision making with visualisations: A cognitive framework across disciplines. Cogn Res PrincImplic. 2018;3:29. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53110.15857

Date of Submission: Nov 01, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 29, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 10, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 05, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 09, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 22, 2021 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com