Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 172791

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : DC15 - DC19 Full Version

Phenotypic Characterisation of Proteus Species Isolated from Different Clinical Samples with Special Reference to Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in a Tertiary Care Centre


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51928.15901
P Snega Priya, Manonmoney, KV Leela

1. Masters in Science, Department of Microbiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Manonmoney,
23, First Main Road, Newcolony, Chromepet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drmanonmanij@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Proteus species are vulnerable to cause community-acquired and Healthcare Acquired Infections (HCAI). This organism is grouped under opportunistic pathogen and implicates a wide range of infection in humans. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in this species is alarming and life threatening.

Aim: To evaluate the prevalence and the resistance pattern of Proteus species isolated from various clinical samples by conventional culture methods.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted from May 2020 to April 2021. The study was conducted at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, after approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Proteus isolates from various clinical samples like wound swab, pus, urine, Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF), tracheal swabs, endotracheal aspirate, vaginal swabs, blood, body fluids, ear swab, tissue were collected as per standard protocols. The phenotypic characterisation and resistance pattern of Proteus isolates were done by conventional culture methods. The analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0.

Results: Out of 100 isolates, the higher number of Proteus species was isolated from pus sample (35%), wound swab (22%) and urine sample (25%). Males were found to have a higher prevalence (65%) of infections by Proteus species than females. Proteus mirabilis was the most common isolated species (89%) in this study. The Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) producers among Proteus species were found to be 39%, AmpC producers to be 20% and carbapenemase producer 1%. Proteus species had the highest sensitivity to piperacillin tazobactam (100%), tigecycline (100%), meropenem and imipenem (98%) in this study.

Conclusion: It was concluded that there was an increasing occurrence of drug resistance Proteus species. Their resistance is contributed by production of ESBL, AmpC and carbapenemase enzymes. The screening test alone is sufficient for detection of antibiotic resistance. Hence, there is a need for reliable phenotypic confirmatory test to identify the resistance among Proteus species.

Keywords

Antimicrobial resistance, Non lactose fermenter, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Swarming

The Proteus genus is included in tribe Proteeae comes under the family of Enterobacteriaceae which are pleomorphic gram negative bacilli. The Proteus species are mostly saprophytic which can be isolated commonly from sewage and decomposing animal matter (1). In concordance to humans, this species is a commensal of skin and intestine. They are grouped under opportunistic pathogen that causes infections mainly in urinary tract, skin and soft tissues (2). The main pathogenic organism in this family includes Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis), P. vulgaris and P. penneri.

Among these species, the most commonly isolated species is P. mirabilis which causes Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and wound infection. In addition, P. mirabilis is also found to be the cause of empyema, bacteraemia, neonatal meningoencephalitis, renal calculi, diarrhoea and osteomyelitis. P. vulgaris is mostly isolated from patients who are immunocompromised like people who are on long term antibiotics (1),(2). Proteus species corresponds to 10-15% of complicated UTI in catheterised patients. P. mirabilis is considered as the most commonly encountered pathogen causing UTI. The prevalence of UTI in chronically catheterised patients by Proteus is about 20-45% (3).

P. penneri is capable of outbreaks of nosocomial infections (4). Few articles have documented that P. penneri can be isolated from the patients suffering from UTI, wound and epidural ulcers and samples such as pus, conjunctiva, bronchoalveolar lavage (5). It is isolated from the urine at a prevalence of 50%, Skin and Soft tissue Infection (SSI) with 25% and blood samples at 15% (6). The Proteus species is also found to cause UTI in patients suffering from urinary tract abnormalities and catheterised patients. The Proteus infection is found to be the reason for the development of renal stones and pyelonephritis (6). The virulence factors of Proteus species is varied and stated to be the production of urease, swarming, formation of biofilm, formation of calculi, proteolytic enzymes, fimbriae and haemolysin production (7),(8).

The Proteus species are also found to be infecting diabetic patients at a higher rate. They can cause tissue destruction in these patients (9). They are opportunistic pathogens and the main source of transmission includes equipment’s used in hospital, open wounds, trauma and patient to patient spread through contaminated surfaces (4). The Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Proteus species is increasing in health sectors. The increase in resistance to antibiotics accounts to challenge in the treatment of patient which increases the death rate. The mechanism by which Proteus species shows resistance to antibiotics includes the production of ESBL, carbapenamase and AmpC (10).

The majority of resistance is caused by ESBLs which is a major group of beta-lactamases (11). The ESBL shows resistance to ceftazidime but sensitivity to ceftazidime in combination with clavulanic acid. The ESBL production shows a high risk for the community and accounts for many outbreaks. The major threats posed by ESBLs include ineffectiveness of antibiotics, high cost, increased hospital stay and increased complications. The treatments are becoming limited due to the rapid increase in the ESBL. The screening of ESBLs is required to control the infection worldwide (12),(14). Another major class, AmpC beta-lactamases cause resistance to the penicillin group of drugs, cephalosporins and monobactams (15). The next important resistance mechanism is resistance to carbapenems. Carbapenemase resistance poses a major difficulty in treating the severely ill patients. The evolvement of MDR implies major threat to therapeutics and has become the major source of HCAI (16). The antimicrobial resistance is becoming the main burden to healthcare system. The current study assesses the prevalence of infections caused by Proteus species including the resistance pattern which is helpful in characterisation of the Proteus species as there is less data available regarding the resistance in Proteus species.

Material and Methods

The present study was a descriptive, cross-sectional study done between May 2020 to April 2021. The present study was approved by IEC of SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India (Ethical clearance number: 1934/IEC/2020).

Inclusion criteria: All non duplicate Proteus isolates from various clinical samples like pus, sputum, urine, CSF, tracheal swab, endotracheal aspirate, vaginal swab, blood, body fluids, ear swab, and tissue were included. Samples collected before initiation of antibiotic therapy were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Isolates other than Proteus species from various clinical samples were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Study sample size approx. 100, n=4pq/d2

(Calculated and approved by Statistician).

p=Prevalence rate=5.82% (17)

p=5.8/100=0.582

q=(100-p)

n=4×0.0582×0.9418/0.0025

=0.2193/0.0025

=87.7

=88- final sample size of 100 was taken

Study Procedure

Identification: Clinical samples were obtained in an aseptic manner and processed using standard microbiological techniques (1). Conventional culture techniques were used to isolate the Proteus species. It produces swarming on blood agar, non lactose fermenting colonies on MacConkey agar. The biochemical tests were used to speciate Proteus. It shows positive for phenylalanine deaminase test (PPA), abundant H2S production with gas in Triple Sugar Iron (TSI) agar, and is a rapid urease producer. Indole is positive in P. vulgaris that distinguishes it from P. mirabilis which is indole negative. P. penneri is distinguished from P. mirabilis by maltose fermentation and the absence of ornithine decarboxylase (1),(18).

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST): The assessment of antibiotic susceptibility is carried on Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) by the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for 2020 were used to interpret the zone sizes (19). The following antibiotic disc were used ampicillin (10 (μg), amoxicillin-clavulanate (20μg/10μg), ceftazidime (30μg) cetazidime with clavulanuic acid (30μg/20 μg), cefipime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), piperacillin tazobactam (100 μg/10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefazolin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 mg), tetracycline (30 μg), tigecycline (15 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg) (purchased from Himedia, Mumbai, India). The zone size was interpreted after 18-24 hours of incubation at 37°C.

Phenotypic Confirmatory Tests for ESBL, AmpC and Carbapenamase Producers

Double disc diffusion test for detecting ESBL: Two antibiotic discs were used namely ceftazidime (30 μg) and cetazidime with clavulanic acid (CAC) (30 μg/20 μg). The CAC is placed in centre of MHA plate and ceftazidime is placed with a distance about 1.5 cm from each other. The inhibition zone development towards CAC disc after incubating at 37°C for 24 hours indicated the presence of an ESBL positive organism (11),(12).

Modified three-dimensional test for AmpC producers: On MHA, lawn culture is put, and a cefoxitin disc of 30 μg is placed in the plate. A sterile surgical blade is used to cut a 3 cm long slit 2-3 mm away from cefoxitin drug disc. A well is done at the other end using a pipette tip. The AmpC beta-lactamase enzyme is obtained by alternate freeze and thawing for 7-8 times before centrifuging at 2500 rpm (revolution per minute) for 15 mins. The AmpC beta-lactamase enzymes were released into the suspending fluid as a result of this method. The prepared well is then filled with a total of 20-30 μL of the supernatant containing the extract. After allowing the enzyme to fill and disperse into the slit for 5-10 minutes, the plates were kept at 37°C up to 24 hours for incubation. A slight heart shaped zone of lysis towards cefoxitin drug suggested a positive result. In this test, the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) Escherichia coli 25922 was used as the indicator strain (20).

Modified Hodge Test (MHT): In peptone broth ATCC E. coli 25922 is grown and adjusted to McFarland standards (0.5). The MHA plate is streaked with a 1/10 dilution. In the centre of the test region, a meropenem 10 μg disc is mounted. The test organism is streaked from edge of discs and kept at 37°C for 16-24 hours. The carbapenem discs were subjected to quality control in compliance with CLSI guidelines. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 1705 was used as the control organism (21),(22).

Statistical Analysis

The information thus obtained is entered in MS-excel (Microsoft office professional 13) spread sheet for each isolate and the analysis was done using SPSS software version 24.0.

Results

Out of 100 Proteus isolates, 39 were isolated between the age group of 61-75 years, 34 were between the age group of 46-60 years and around 15 between the age group of 31-45 year (Table/Fig 1). Proteus isolates were collected, subjected to identification by conventional culture, biochemical and AST. Culture was done on MacConkey agar, Blood agar, and Phenylalanine deaminase test (PPA) were all used to validate the Proteus species. In MacConkey agar Proteus isolates produced non lactose fermenting colonies. In blood agar Proteus species produce a swarming growth which is a unique characteristic feature of this organism (Table/Fig 2). The PPA test was positive for all Proteus species due to the fact that this species is able to produce an enzyme called phenylalanine deaminase that converts phenylalanine to phenylpyruvic acid. The prevalence of Proteus mirabilis was found to be 89% whereas Proteus vulgaris was found to be 11%. The specimen wise distribution of the Proteus species; maximum number of Proteus species was isolated from the pus (35%) followed by the urine samples (25%) and wound swab (22%) and other samples as shown in (Table/Fig 3). The maximum number of Proteus species were isolated from wound infection (60%) followed by UTI (20%) (Table/Fig 4).

Antibiotic susceptibility testing: The AST was performed on the isolates, screening ESBL, AmpC β-lactamase and carbapenamase producers. The zone sizes were interpreted according to CLSI 2020 guidelines. The ESBL producer shows ≥5 differences in zone size between ceftazidime and ceftazidime with clavulanic acid. The resistance to cefoxitin is considered as AmpC producer. The resistance to imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem is considered to be carbapenamase producer. Proteus species had the highest sensitivity to piperacillin tazobactam (100%), tigecycline (100%) and meropenem and imipenem (98%) in this study (Table/Fig 5). The present study demonstrates ampicillin resistance to be 64% and 43% resistance to cefazolin. From the AST report it was found that there were 41 ESBL producer, 25 AmpC producer and two carbapenamase producer.

Confirmatory tests for ESBL, AmpC and Carbapenamase producers:

a. Double disc diffusion test for detecting ESBL: The 41 test isolates which were found to be ESBL producer by standard AST was subjected to phenotypic confirmatory test. The confirmatory test was positive in 39 isolates (Table/Fig 6).

b. Modified three-dimensional test for AmpC producers: The 25 test isolates which were found to be AmpC producer by standard AST was subjected to phenotypic confirmatory test. The confirmatory test was positive in 20 isolates (Table/Fig 6).

c. Modified Hodge Test (MHT): The two test isolates which were found to be carbapenamase producer by standard AST was subjected to phenotypic confirmatory test. The confirmatory test was positive in one isolate (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

Proteus species is found throughout the environment and is a normal part of the human gastrointestinal tract's flora. Escherichia coli is considered the most common cause of uncomplicated cystitis, pyelonephritis, and prostatitis. Proteus is considered the third most common cause, especially in hospital acquired infections (23). The maximum numbers of Proteus species was between the age group of 61-75 years (39%), 46-60 years (34%) and 31-45 years (15%). Maheswary D and Chitralekha S and Prasad RR et al., found similar results (17),(24). The 89% of the Proteus species was found to be P. mirabilis in this analysis and 11% was P. vulgaris. The variation in prevalence rate between the previous studies may be due to difference in demography and also the Proteus is getting highly virulent and spreads at higher rate (Table/Fig 7) (17),(25),(26).

Since, the antibiotic resistance patterns of Proteus species vary with different species hence species reporting is essential. In comparison to P. vulgaris that has inherent resistance to variety of antimicrobial agents P. mirabilis was found to be the most susceptible species. The highest number of Proteus species is collected from the pus sample (35%), followed by the urine samples (25%). Proteus species was also isolated from blood (1%), ear swab (5%), tissue (10%) and from tracheal aspirate (2%) sample. Bahashwan SA and Shafey HME, Feglo PK et al., Leulmi Z et al., and Shenoy SM et al., reported maximum isolates from pus whereas some studies have reported isolates more commonly from urine than other clinical specimens (23),(27),(28),(29),(30),(31),(32).

When there are predisposing conditions such as surgery or catheterisation, Proteus plays a major role in UTI. Adhesion factors, flagella (swarming), Immunoglobulin A (IgA) protease, and the urease enzyme are all virulence factors that assist the organism to establish an infection. The formation of bladder or kidney stones as a result of the activity of the urease enzyme, which causes polyvalent cations such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ to precipitate out of the urine and form struvite stones, which obstruct the urinary tract or catheters, making treatment difficult and allowing the bacteria to persist and multiply and causing the complications. Males are more likely to have a UTI from Proteus (29). In present study, the majority of isolates (65%) came from male UTI patients with old age group. Various research have shown a similar gender distribution (27),(33).

Proteus species had the highest sensitivity to piperacillin tazobactam (100%), tigecycline (100%) and meropenem and imipenem (98%). Kengne M et al., recorded 100% sensitivity for piperacillin tazobactam and meropenem and Preethishree P et al., reported 100% sensitivity for piperacillin tazobactam and meropenem (34),(35). In the present study, amikacin is found to be 88% sensitive whereas gentamicin was found to be 72% sensitive. Alexis A and Sakthivennila M recorded 60% gentamicin resistance (36). The present study demonstrates ampicillin resistance to be 64%. In comparison to the above analysis, Kargar M et al., reported a high sensitivity percentage of 84% to gentamicin (37). In contrast to this analysis Kengne M et al., recorded an increase in ampicillin resistance of about 91% (34). The present study demonstrated the screening test to be 41% ESBL producers and the confirmatory test was positive for 39%. In this present study, AmpC beta lactamases production was detected by screening test in 25% of cases and by confirmatory test of 20% of cases. The carbapenemase producers were found to be 2% in the screening test and 1% in the confirmatory test. Similar results were found in Maheswary D and Chitralekha S (17). Hence, this study emphasises the data of prevalence along with antimicrobial resistance pattern of Proteus species which will provide a good understanding of the resistance pattern at species level and aids in rational use of antibiotics ultimately helping to reduce the increasing antimicrobial resistance threat.

Limitation(s)

The detection of gene responsible for the antimicrobial resistance by molecular methods was not included in the study.

Conclusion

There was an increasing occurrence of drug resistance in Proteus species. Only screening test will not be sufficient for detection of antibiotic resistance. Hence, reliable phenotypic confirmatory test to identify the resistance among Proteus species is required. The confirmatory test such as combined disc diffusion test (ESBL detection), 3-dimensional AmpC assay (AmpC detection) and MHT (Carbapenemase detection) is found to be more significant, reliable and can be carried out easily in a routine microbiology testing laboratories aiding to identify the resistant species and significantly helps in the rationale use of antibiotics.

References

1.
Koneman EW, Koneman AS. Diagnostico Microbiologico/Microbiological diagnosis: Texto Y Atlas En Color/ Text and Color Atlas. in Médica panamericana. 2008;277-79.
2.
Panikar AA, Ananthanarayan R, Ananthanarayan and Paniker舗s Textbook of Microbiology. Universities Press, Tenth edition. 2005;37:288-89.
3.
Karthik R, Ambica R, Nagarathnamma T. Study of biofilm production and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in clinical isolates of Proteus species at a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(1):574-86. [crossref]
4.
Ostwal K, Shah P, Rebecca L, Shaikh N, Inole K. A tale of two novel Proteus species-Proteus hauseri and Proteus penneri. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2016;5(5):84-89. [crossref]
5.
Krajden S, Fuksa M, Petrea C, Crisp LJ, Penner JL. Expanded clinical spectrum of infections caused by Proteus penneri. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology; 1987;25(3):578-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kishore J. Isolation, identification & characterisation of Proteus penneri-A missed rare pathogen. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135(3):341-45.
7.
Mishra M, Thakar Y, Pathak A. Haemagglutination, haemolysin production and serum resistance of Proteus and related species isolated from clinical sources. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2001;19(2):05-11. [crossref]
8.
Syntem S, Dutta H, Kalyani M. Characterisation of Proteus species and detection of Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) with special reference to ESBL Strains. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2016;5(11):153-60. [crossref]
9.
Anandi C, Alaguraja D, Natarajan V, Ramanathan M, Subramaniam CS, Thulasiram M, et al. Bacteriology of diabetic foot lesions. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2004;22(3):175-78. [crossref]
10.
Al-Jumaily EFA, Zgaer SH. Multidrug resistant Proteus mirabilis isolated from urinary tract infection from different hospitals in Baghdad City. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 2016;5(9):390-99. [crossref]
11.
Rodrigues C, Joshi P, Jani S, Alphonse M, Radhakrishnan R, Mehta A. Detection of β -lactamases in nosocomial gram-negative clinical isolates. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. Elsevier BV; 2004;22(4):247-50. [crossref]
12.
Nandagopal B, Sankar S, Sagadevan K, Arumugam H, Jesudason M, Aswathaman K, et al. Frequency of extended spectrum ß-lactamase producing urinary isolates of gram-negative bacilli among patients seen in a multispecialty hospital in Vellore district, India. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2015;33(2):282-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Bajpai T, Pandey M, Varma M, Bhatambare G. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing uropathogens and their antibiotic resistance profile in patients visiting a tertiary care hospital in central India: Implications on empiric therapy. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2014;57(3):407. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Grover N, Sahni AK, Bhattacharya S. Therapeutic challenges of ESBLS and AmpC beta-lactamase producers in a tertiary care center. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2013;69(1):04-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Coudron PE, Moland ES, Thomson KS. Occurrence and detection of AmpC Beta-Lactamases among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis isolates at a Veterans Medical Center. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology. 2000;38(5):1791-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Gomatheswari SN, Jeyamurugan T. Bacteriological profile and the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of microorganisms isolated from pus/wound swab isolates in patients attending a tertiary care hospital in South India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017;6(10):1405-13. [crossref]
17.
Maheswary D, Chitralekha S. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility in Proteus species isolated from diverse clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital. Sch J App Med Sci. 2018;6(11):4328-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
O’Hara CM, Brenner FW, Miller JM. Classification, identification, and clinical significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. American Society for Microbiology. 2000;13(4):534-46.
19.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 2021.
20.
Maraskolhe DL. Comparision of three Laboratory tests for detection of Ampc β lactamases in Klebsiella species and E.coli. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(6):DC05-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Amjad A, Mirza Ia, Abbasi S, Farwa U, Malik N, Zia F. Modified Hodge test: A simple and effective test for detection of carbapenemase production. Iran J Microbiol. 2011;3(4):189-93.
22.
Cury A, Andreazzi D, Maffucci M, Caiaffa-Junior H, Rossi F. The modified hodge test is a useful tool for ruling out Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. Clinics. Fundacao Faculdade de Medicina; 2012;67(12):1427-31. [crossref]
23.
Bahashwan SA, Shafey HME. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Proteus isolates from clinical specimens. European Scientific Journal. 2013;9(27):188-202.
24.
Prasad RR, Shree V, Sagar S, Kumar S, Kumar P. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Proteus species in clinical samples. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2016;10;5(4):962-68. [crossref]
25.
Nirali D, Dipika P. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Proteus species from various clinical samples coming to a tertiary care hospital, Rajkot. MedPulse International Journal of Microbiology. 2020;15(3):14-18. [crossref]
26.
Pal N, Sharma N, Sharma R, Hooja S, Maheshwari K. Prevalence of Multidrug (MDR) and Extensively Drug Resistant (XDR) Proteus species in a tertiary care hospital, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014;3(10):243-52.
27.
Feglo PK, Gbedema SY, Quay SNA, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Opoku-Okrah C. Occurrence, species distribution and antibiotic resistance of Proteus isolates: A case study at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) in Ghana. International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research (IJPSR). 2010;1:347-52.
28.
Leulmi Z, Kandouli C, Benlabed K,Lezzar A, Ilhem Mihoubi I. Prevalence and evaluation of resistance to antibiotics of genera Proteus, Morganella and Providencia isolates in University Hospital of Constantine, Algeria. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2014;2(1):220-27.
29.
Shenoy SM, Mohit, Sinha R. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of clinical isolates of Proteus species with special reference to ESBL and Amp C production. Indian Journal of Advanced Research. 2013;3(3):293-94. [crossref]
30.
Al-Bassam WW, Kazaz AKA. The isolation and characterisation of Proteus mirabilis from different clinical samples. Journal of Biotechnology Research Center. 2013;7(2):24-30. [crossref]
31.
De Champs C, Bonnet R, Sirot D, Chanal C, Sirot J. Clinical relevance of Proteus mirabilis in hospital patients: A two year survey. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2000;45:537-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Jabur MH, Saedi EAL, Trad JK. Isolation of Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris from different clinical sources and study of some virulence factors from Babylon University, College of medicine. Pure and Applied Sciences. 2013;21(1):43-48.
33.
Kamga HLF, Assob JCN, Nsagha DS, Njunda AL, Nde Fon P, Tchape GNE. Epidemiological studies on Proteeae isolates from clinical specimens in the Laquintinie Hospital in Douala, Cameroon. African Journal of Clinical And Experimental Microbiology AJCEM). 2012;13:112-20. [crossref]
34.
Kengne M, Dounia AT, Nwobegahay JM. Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of urine culture isolates from patients in Ndjamena, Chad. Pan African Medical Journal. 2017;28. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Preethishree P, Rai R, Kumar KV, Pai KBA, Bhat UP. Uropathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Coastal Karnataka, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2016;5(1):23-31. [crossref]
36.
Alexis A, Sakthivennila M. Bacteriological spectrum and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in diabetic ulcer patients attending the tertiary care hospital to facilitate the reduction in morbidity and amputation. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(05):1465-79. [crossref]
37.
Kargar M, Jahromi M, Najafi A, Ghorbani-Dalini S, Kargar M. Molecular detection of ESBLs production and antibiotic resistance patterns in gram negative bacilli isolated from urinary tract infections. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2014;57(2):244. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51928.15901

Date of Submission: Aug 14, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Sep 15, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 06, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

Author declarati on:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 18, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 05, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Nov 20, 2021 (8%)

Etymology: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com