Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 89890

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : JE01 - JE04 Full Version

Will AETCOM Resurrect Empathy in Medical Profession? A Lost Touch of Compassionate Communication


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52713.15827
Niraj Rathod, Seema Rawat, Uttam Kumar Solanki, Komal Makwana

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, SBKS Medical College, Pipariya, Waghodia, Baroda, Gujarat, India. 2. Professor, Department of Physiology, C.U.Shah Medical College, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Junagadh, Gujarat, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, GMERS Medical College, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Komal Makwana,
A Block 202, Doctor Quarters, GMERS Medical College and Hospital Campus, Gotri, Baroda-390021, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: drkomalmakwana@gmail.com

Abstract

To make the existing Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) curriculum more effective as per the healthcare needs of the nation, the Medical Council of India (MCI) has taken a bold step by proposing new teaching-learning approaches including, a structured longitudinal program on attitude, ethics, and communication, which is named as the Attitude, Ethics and Communication Module (AETCOM). Intervention like AETCOM is required because the fragmental, ignored and traditional approach of learning empathy and communication was not standardised nor effective. This lead to devastated doctor patient relationship resulting in rising number of medicolegal cases in the scenario. It’s been two years since the introduction of the module and many studies have been conducted to analyse the effectiveness of the same. However, some questions still remain unanswered, such as- Will this introduction of humanities in medicine infuse values and art of medicine with ever-growing science? Will it be successful in inculcating probity in Indian medical graduate? If no, then what needs to be done to get a better outcome for the same. Authors want to spread awareness by sparking curiosity in both medical and general population through this article and in the process, make efforts wants to find out improvements to be done right now to ensure we get good doctors in the future.

Keywords

Attitude ethics and communication module, Humanities in medicine, Medical council of India, National medical commission

What is the Problem?

When every medical student starts their journey in the first year all have different dreams and aspirations, but one goal is common for all, they all want to be “a good doctor”. Every human has certain notions about “good doctor”, but the most important is the perception of the patient (1). So, the next question is-are we as a system producing doctors who are good enough? The highest governing authority in the health system is trying its level best to achieve the same. The medical curriculum and training programs designed by the MCI and currently updated by the National Medical Commission (NMC) were to address Specific Learning Objectives (SLOs) addressing primarily three domains: cognitive, psychomotor, and affective (head, hand, and heart, respectively). However, until recently, the traditional way of medical education in India dealt mainly with the head compared to the hand and nearly neglected the heart. Hence, it was not upto the mark to produce a clinician who could provide a holistic approach to patient care (i.e., preventive, curative, and palliative care) with empathy and compassion (2).

The rising number of medicolegal cases in present time are in support with foresaid statement (3). Bevinahalli N, in his article has mentioned that best way to deal with medicolegal issue is preventing them and changing the attitude. He also states that good communication skill is beneficial for doctor patient relationship (3). These kinds of outcomes based on current observation and previous research demanded a dire need for revision of the existing medical curriculum, but, with careful approach towards understanding medical student needs also while keeping patient centered training (4). So by applying trial and error method and after lots of churning, Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) came into existence starting from 1st phase to 4th phase of medical school in forms of three curriculum modules (5),(6),(7). After completing national level sensitisation of faculties proactively, this programme was implemented for undergraduate medical batch from the year 2019 as per the latest Graduate Medical Education Regulation (GMER 2019) by NMC. The uniqueness is that the outcome is expressed in terms of competencies which are standardised even to teach empathy, communication and leadership; the nuances which addresses the affective domain covered in AETCOM (8). The CBME curriculum has successfully incorporated the AETCOM, which addresses the “heart” and emphasises on instilling proper attitude and communication skills and to prepare medical graduates to practice ethically in the real world scenario.

The GMER and AETCOM module are more of a guideline and every college and university are given the freedom to adapt and form their working plan of assessment. Whatever the plan of action is, a record of every proceeding is to be maintained and sent to the MCI regional centre. The regional centre will then compile all the activities of the sister medical college and hospitals and communicate to the nodal centre and subsequently to MCI. Even after clear cut division of AETCOM competencies according to subject disciplines and faculty sensitisation, AETCOM module is getting mixed response (9),(10).

So, the onus is on medical faculty to introduce and teach AETCOM modules in a way that is motivating and interesting enough to grasp and practice soft skills as per their professional and personal needs. Medical teachers also need to develop a proper assessment methodology for feedback purposes for the newly introduced modules. But the question here is- Are the students willing to learn all this? As a student, they will not focus on “what to learn” if they are not sensitised enough for “why to learn”. Medical students are already stressed about the herculean task of completing the course before the exam (11) so they plan strategically and stake-wise where AETCOM may be the last of their list to do if not enough sensitisation and weightage according to marks is given. It is also reported that students grow more apathetic towards AETCOM skills in the 4th phase compared to the 1st phase (4).

Some researchers found that students were not showing keen interest and exhibiting casual behaviour towards this module and some found that when taught properly and assessed properly AETCOM modules are perceived well by students (12),(13). So, it is required to work out probable reasons for the apathetic behaviour of the students towards soft skills as they are moving ahead in their medical studies and atleast try to find the middle ground.

Some of the reasons for apathetic behaviour towards the module could be as given below:

• Lack of proper weightage in marking system of the paper (six marks for this module assessment).
• Wrong methods for assessment (12).
• Inability to understand the importance of the module.
• Not taught in a way that excites them or makes them curious to learn more about the same (13).
• Soft skills were never taught to medical students as a part of the curriculum, so they are nonchalant about this, though it is a known fact that soft skills play a very important role in the doctor-patient relationship and can be used judiciously for a better outcome.
• The confined environment of medical schools leads to difficulties in accepting newer module introductions other than their conventional medical subjects (14),(15).
• As it is new for the teacher as well, they are struggling with authentic resources and content (15).

The Proposed Solution to the Problem

Solution of a problem requires giving consideration to several points of a problem which should be addressed properly to get a better solution, so brainstorming sessions among the faculty should be encouraged by the medical education unit of the institutions to answer the following questions:

• How much training for skill development (AETCOM) will be sufficient and effective?
• Which Teaching-Learning methods (T-L methods) should be included to make the students more receptive towards the subject?
• How can students be sensitised for soft skill development and interest in humanities in the medical field?
• How can we motivate students to take this module seriously as lifelong learners?

Following are the points which can be taken into account when we are planning to introduce the AETCOM module:

A better understanding of the module with its importance in the medial field

(What is AETCOM? Why practice AETCOM?)

First thing is to explain to the students about the importance of soft skills in every phase of their lives, professional as well as personal. With examples, they can be assured that effective communication and empathetic behaviour towards a patient will help them not only to become a good doctor but also score better in standardised patient examinations (16). For this, faculty can opt for interactive discussions where they can act as a moderator and let the students discuss the topic at length and can encourage them to discuss how a good communication skill can change the scenario between a patient and doctor and how a doctor can secure faith of a patient using soft skills (17),(18). Role playing as T-L a method can be chosen to convey the message loud and clear (19).

Reflection Method

If students are asked to share/write some good, not so good or bad experiences of their life depicting the importance of soft skills, they will realise the magnitude of its importance in-depth to maintain work/life balance (20).

It’s a proven fact that assessment motivates a student to learn better. “Good Student” who is on top of the curve bell based on the marking system might not be a “Good Doctor” (21). But an age-old fact is that good scoring in the long run is always motivation for learning (22). So, to promote interest academically, internal marking system can be included for this module, where students will be observed and marked for their soft skills during the clinical labs where they are interacting in simulating environment (holistic evaluation).

Activity based Learning

To ensure good empathetic compassionate communication skills in future Indian medical graduates, history taking should be made compulsory in phase one of university exams, emphasising soft skills which can be taught as a part of Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) (23). Medical students are already burdened with the shortage of time, but a creative solution like the use of compulsory extracurricular time slots may be pondered over. The NMC has made it compulsory to provide some slots for extracurricular activity which needs recording in logbooks of students. During those sessions, debate or monologue or essay writing competitions can be arranged on topics (under the guidance of faculty) like:

• Violence against doctors
• Good clinical practices
• Reasons and solution for increasing medicolegal cases against doctors
• Expectations of a doctor from the patient and their relatives
• Expectations of a patient from the hospital and the doctor
• Importance of local languages in clinical practice
• How to use soft skills to break bad news
• Importance of body language in doctor patient relationship
• Communication skills to break the bad news to patient’s relatives
• Use of soft skills in dealing with patient’s relatives

There is research indicating that point of view writing can improve affective dimension skill, although the translation in clinical correlation is a matter of further research (24).

Learning through Available Research Material

First-year onwards students can be moved from theory to practice mode asking them to share their experiences of clinical postings. Students could be asked to choose soft skills in their postings and then to write their experiences of soft skills. Such small reflections will motivate them to become good empathetic communicators. Lots of research work has been done on, “Empathetic and compassionate behaviour and good communication skill.” Following points with scientific proofs can be discussed at length for a better understanding of the subject in interactive sessions for students:

1. Proper dressing which is respectable in your community and culture, apron and stethoscope is a must (25),(26).
2. Wearing a smile or soft gesture even in case of tension. Use of small introductory sentences to make the patient comfortable (27).
3. Showing interest while listening to the patient’s problem by slightly leaning forward and maintaining eye contact. Non verbal expressions which we discussed in the above examples are important, such as eye contact, the facial expression of a doctor, your gestures, body language, tone of your voice and silence (27).
4. Maintain distance that is comfortable for the patient, going too close may be uncomfortable for both doctor and patient.
5. To sit in relaxed and attentive mode. There is a study which states that, when doctors on rounds sit beside the patient, the history taking is fast and productive compared to standing doctors, because, when doctor sits near bedside the patient feels calm and properly attended (28). During faculty-student interaction one clinical faculty suggested that students should not wear their backpack during history taking because it is an indirect sign to the patient, that they want to complete history faster, if possible and allowed the student to sit on a stool or chair nearby the patient while taking history.
6. Some minor behaviours give wrong impressions to the patient while he or she is telling their problem to the doctor. We should avoid such behaviours such as checking watch too often, wearing a backpack, doing another work, talking over the phone or talking to someone else. Even small movements like shaking legs/hands, tapping fingers on table or bedside were included as unprofessional behaviour (29). Unprofessional behaviour breaches patients’ trust to open up to the doctor and creates disinterest in sharing their things. The patient might hide the most crucial details which are very personal in the case of psychiatric patients or sexually transmitted disease patients.
7. During student-faculty interaction one unique question came where student raised an issue that “the events reported by patients were so tragic I got no words to say. What can I do in that position? Then a psychiatric faculty replied a silent pause is also empathetic. Then she gave example “what I mean by silence- some time lady patient shares a very bad experience with us, like a death in her family and she starts crying. At that time, you might be confused about how to give her consolation? Your intention might be good, and you would say something like “Its god wish. What can we do?” if your tone is not appropriate it may sound rude and apathetic to patients. On such occasions when you are not sure about words, silence is better. Just take a silent pause and if the patient is female then you can just slightly gently tap her on the back or hands, or if the patient is male, please don’t touch just offer her water. Don’t try to rush on the next question. Just give her some time in such scenario, as silence has empathetic value.
8. Gender issues- As discussed in the above scenario, in our Indian culture if you touch the opposite gender, even in an attempt to console, it might be taken offensively by patient. So as a doctor, whenever you are examining a patient of the opposite gender, for example you are male doctor and examining female patient, a lady attendant who can be patient relative or your doctor colleague or a nurse must be present there to avoid medicolegal complication (3),(29). In examination room, third party attendant should be always present regardless of gender of patient (3),(29).
9. Summarising in the end is very important- After taking such long history and examination you must inform patient that why did you ask all this. How it helped in provisional diagnosis and what is next stage. If you are a student than ask to your clinical teacher about this and communicate appropriately. Don’t forget to thank the patient for their time and cooperation. Leaving without informing them is impudently unprofessional (29).

Despite the guidance given by NMC, faculties and students both are novice exploring the new course ahead. In this review we are lacking in communication and information from patient side at local level and no generalised concepts have been given by faculties regarding patients point of view. The previous researches done in western countries are used for concept. But India is very different in societal, cultural, geographical and religious manner. So, translating their thoughts and ideas in accordance to Indian community is challenging and limiting factor for this article.

Conclusion

The introduction of the AETCOM module in different phases of undergraduate medical course is an attempt to reintroduce the lost touch of humanity in medicine. In earlier times, these soft skills were taught by seniors and clinical teachers through their actions, but in the present scenario, it is almost negligible in magnitude. Soft skills and empathy can be used by a medical practitioner as a tool in the treatment process. The AETCOM module introduction has its share of problems related to its implementations and assessments. To overcome these hurdles medical fraternities are advised to learn through reading, research, brainstorming sessions, and then to make the module interesting, motivating, and assessable for the students. A lot of revisions of these sessions will be required to get the desired outcome. So, there is a hope that the AETCOM module might resurrect empathy and compassionate communication in the doctor-patient relationship in the future.

References

1.
Carroll L, Sullivan FM, Colledge M. Good health care: Patient and professional perspectives. Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48:1507-08.
2.
Sinclair S, Norris J, McConnell M. Compassion: A scoping review of the healthcare literature. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;6:15-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Bevinahalli N. Preventing medico legal issues in clinical practice. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016;19:15 20. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Roger R, Cristina L, Fernando M. Medical students' attitudes toward communication skills learning: Comparison between two groups with and without training. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:55-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Avinash S, Krishna G, Praveen S, Sajith Kumar R, Chalam P, Subir K, et al. Competency based undergraduate curriculum for the Indian medical graduate. 2018;1:11-252.
6.
Avinash S, Krishna G, Praveen S, Sajith Kumar R, Chalam P, Subir K, et al. Competency based undergraduate curriculum for the Indian medical graduate. 2018;2:11-235.
7.
Avinash S, Krishna G, Praveen S, Sajith Kumar R, Chalam P, Subir K, et al. Competency based undergraduate curriculum for the Indian medical graduate. 2018;3:11-166.
8.
Avinash S, Krishna G, Tejinder S, Sajith Kumar R, Praveen S, Chalam P, et al. Section I & II. AETCOM competencies for IMG. 2018;14-69.
9.
Zayapragassarazan Z, Kumar S, Kadambari D. Record review of feedback of participants on Attitude, Ethics and Communication Module (AETCOM) proposed by Medical Council of India (MCI). Education in Medicine Journal. 2019;11(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.21315/ eimj2019.11.1.5. [crossref]
10.
Mitra J, Saha I. Attitude and communication module in medical curriculum: Rationality and challenges. Indian J Public Health. 2016;60:95-98 [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Elizabeth R. A study on stress levels among first year medical students: A cross sectional study. IOSR-JDMS. 2016;15(5)35-39.
12.
Ghosh A, Bir A. Role of written examination in the assessment of attitude ethics and communication in medical students: Perceptions of medical faculties. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:23. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Shilpa M, Raghunandana R, Narayana K. Empathy in medical education: Does it need to be taught? Students feedback on AETCOM module of learning. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2021;11(4):401-05.
14.
Rajashree R, Chandrashekar DM. Competency-based medical education in India: A work in progress. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020;64(1):57-59. [crossref]
15.
Shaifali M. Niket V. Competency based medical education: The perception of Faculty. Journal of Medical Academics. 2019;2:11-13.
16.
Karen M. Carol A. Impact of a new curriculum on medical students' interpersonal and interviewing skills. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2007;41(2):154-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Kabaa R. Sooriakumaran P. The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship Author links opens overlay pane. International Journal of Surgery. 2007;5:57-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Ha JF, Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: A review. Ochsner J. 2010;10(1):38-43.
19.
Sethi S, Dabas R. Role-play - An effective tool to teach communication skills in paediatrics to medical undergraduates: Comments. J Edu Health Promot. 2019;8:212.
20.
Tikare S. Reflective writing: Experience of first professional medical students with Attitude ethics and communication module. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2021;15(1):41-49. [crossref]
21.
Thomson I. Do "Good" medical students really make good doctors? Academic Medicine. 2017;92(6)735-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Corinne T, Neville C. Anna R. Perceived educational impact of the medical student long case: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20:257-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Avinash S, Krishna G, Sajith Kumar R, Chalam P, Praveen S, Tejinder S, et al. Curriculum implementation support program- early clinical exposure for undergraduate medical education program. 2019;2:9-44.
24.
Shapiro J, Rucker L, Boker J, Lie D. Point-of-view writing: A method for increasing medical students' empathy, identification and expression of emotion, and insight. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2006;19:96-105. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Hartmans C, Heremans S, Lagrain M, Asch KV. The doctor's new clothes: Professional or fashionable? Primary Health Care. 2014;3(3)145.
26.
Tom R. The hallmark of a doctor': The stethoscope and the making of medical identity. Journal of Material Culture. 2002;15(3):287-301. [crossref]
27.
Jennifer F. Doctor-patient communication: A review. Ochsner J. 2010;10(1):38-43.
28.
Kelly J, Kareen K. Effect of sitting vs. standing on perception of provider time at bedside: A pilot study. Patient Education and Counselling. 2011;86(2):166-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Marianne V. Descriptors for unprofessional behaviours of medical students: A systematic review and categorisation BMC Medical Education. 2017;17:164. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52713.15827

Date of Submission: Oct 04, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 28, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 03, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 07, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 03, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 30, 2021 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com