Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 156183

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : MF01 - MF03 Full Version

A Novel Custom Fabricated Teeth Guard for Boyle Davis Mouth Gag- A Feasibility Study


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52472.15914
Padmanabhan Karthikeyan, Neelima Vijayan, Nikhil Sivanand, Shivasakthy Manivasakan, David Livingstone

1. Professor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India. 4. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India. 5. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Neelima Vijayan,
Assistant Professor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Mahatma Gandhi
Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth,
Pillaiyarkuppam, Puducherry, India.
E-mail: dr.neelima.vijayan@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Despite increase in the knowledge about reduction of dental injuries after tonsillectomy, the incidence is still considerable to attract attention. Presently gauze pieces, rubber or soft plastic materials are used. Hence, it was attempted to use a soft elastomeric putty dental material for this purpose which moulds perfectly to the shape of the upper dentition when applied and also gives full coverage of teeth with no reduction of the space when mouth is opened for surgery. It also gives better protection to the upper dentition as the gag fits perfectly on to it when applied. This, unlike gauze piece threads does not get interwined between the gaps of malaligned, prominent or crooked teeth, thereby offering superior protection.

Aim: To describe the feasibility of custom fabricated teeth guard for Boyle Davis mouth gag in oral and oropharyngeal surgeries.

Materials and Methods: An cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Puducherry, India, in association with Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, kerala, India, from February to April 2019. The equipment was simple, comprising of a paste of elastomeric silicone putty which had a base and catalyst which was custom made for the patient, just minutes before application over the patient’s upper dentition and over which the Boyle Davis mouth gag was applied and then the mouth opened for surgery. Total 50 consecutive patients, in the age group of 6-18 posted for tonsillectomy, were inserted with the equipment before application of Boyle Davis (BD) gag. The ease of insertion with a score of 1-4 was recorded from the surgeon. Postoperatively, once the gag was removed along with the custom made putty, the patient’s upper dentition was examined to look for any dental injuries that might have occurred due to gag insertion. The comfort level was assessed by a targeted questionnaire over a scale of difficulty from 1-4, 1 being comfortable and 4 being difficult.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 10.56 years with the mean weight of 38.55 kilograms. There were 27 males and 23 females. In all the patients, pre and perioperative period was uneventful. The ease of insertion score was 1 in all the 50 patients; there were no oral injuries and no residual side-effects due to the material used. The mean score for comfort level was 1.8.

Conclusion: An indigenously made elastomeric teeth guard is extremely effective in preventing dental injuries after application of Boyle Davis mouth gags in cases of adenotonsillectomy under controlled general anaesthesia.

Keywords

Adenotonsillectomy, Dental injury, Mouth guard, Oropharyngeal surgeries

There have been multiple inventions in order to develop a mouth gag instrument, which needed to be implicated for use in oral surgeries since time immemorial (1). The earliest known mouth gags dated to the late 1500 AD. Lorenz Heister in the early years of 17th century, developed a screw like device to keep the mouth open. Being a military surgeon who first described appendicitis, he also treated many patients with tetanus. This became the classic prototype for the future models in the majority of cases (2).

Most patients are very reluctant to open their mouths for examination and this is mostly because of the fear of insertion of instruments along with the fear of pain associated with the insertion. In addition to these, there were patient’s co-morbid conditions like tetanus, epilepsy, stroke which further complicated its usage (2). This called for an imminent need to devise a new form of mouth gag, specifically designed in a way that supports usage by Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) surgeons, dental surgeons and anaesthetists.

The successful construction of an effective mouth gag depends on achieving a balance between different variables which include the surgical site where the mouth gag has to be employed, the construction material of the gag along with its flexibility to be used in multiple sites. It was paramount that for constructing and designing such an mouth guard, the best available material needs to be used (1),(3).

During prior years, a mammoth-tusk gag was used, which was designed especially for senile and edentulous patients (4),(5),(6),(7). Boyle Davis mouth gag is commonly used for keeping the patient’s mouth open during oral/oropharyngeal surgery that leave the surgeon’s hands free to operate on the patient. Generally, the surgeon places cotton/gauze interposed between the Boyle Davis mouth gag frame and the teeth to protect anterior teeth in oral/oropharyngeal surgeries. Protection offered to the teeth is very minimal in this case (5),(6).

Alternatively, other measures used were insertion of cut rubber tubing/soft plastic materials onto the gag so as to prevent any teeth or gum injury. The above measures were used with varying success rates with injuries occasionally occurring to the adjacent area of upper lips, gums and often when associated with grossly misaligned or protruded teeth (6),(7).

Hence, the need to look out and try a method which would address all the above areas of deficit was necessary. This study used soft silicone putty as a guard to existing Boyle Davis mouth gag. This soft putty is a two component silicone elastomers made up of polyvinyl siloxane, with a base and a catalyst. This is an impression material used to make high quality dental impressions with good precision for extra orally fabricated prosthesis. This soft putty is biocompatible and non toxic with excellent details production and a standard and quick setting time. It does not release any toxic substances during and after curing. The properties of the soft putty are high resistance to inorganic chemicals and Ultraviolet (UV) rays, also with great biocompatibility, good mechanical properties and a low linear shrinkage as claimed by the manufacturer.

By adding a customised tooth protection putty index, in combination with the Boyle Davis mouth gag, damage to the upper teeth, upper lips and gums are prevented. This new technique does not require any special training or additional device. It is also cost effective and easily disposable. In this study, it was planned to describe the feasibility of custom fabricated teeth guard for Boyle Davis mouth gag in oral and oropharyngeal surgeries.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional observational study, conducted in the Department of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Puducherry, India, after approval from the Institutional Research and Academic Committee (L-89957/2020). Individual consent from each patient was obtained. The study was conducted over a period of three months, February to April 2019. A sample size of 50 was obtained, based on the routine number of patients undergoing tonsillectomy in a span of three months in the institute.

Inclusion criteria: Healthy patients of age between 6-18 years with malpositioned or mal erupted teeth who were planned for tonsillectomy with oral intubation tube and Boyle Davis mouth gag were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria: Unwilling patients, patients with congenital diseases of oral cavity and oropharynx, fallen or loose teeth were excluded. The diagnosis of malpositioned, crowded or prominent dentition was confirmed by orthodontic surgeon.

Study Procedure

Preparation and fixation of putty material: Polyvinyl siloxane, an elastomeric rubber base material is used in dentistry for various applications. This base material was applied to the teeth and allowed to set around the dentition. The preformed base and catalyst was mixed after the patient was intubated, positioned and draped for surgery and immediately within minutes of mixing, the soft putty material was fixed by moulding it around the upper dentition and the adjacent portion of hard palate. The putty sets very fast and therefore it was reconstituted just before insertion. Once the material is fixed and becomes firm, it protects the teeth from trauma due to application of the Boyle Davis mouth gag. This teeth guard was inserted after intubation, before insertion of Boyle Davis gag [Table/Fig-1-5].

• The primary outcome measure was the ease of Boyle Davis mouth gag insertion in the grade of four: very easy (1); easy (2); slightly difficult (3); and difficult (4). The surgeons were adequately experienced with having used the previous gauze pieces as teeth protectors.
• The secondary outcome measure was the incidence of any form of dental injury. This was certified by a dental surgeon after the surgery. The aforementioned mean score for comfort level and ease of insertion score, are unvalidated scores derived from present own personal experience over the decade.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used in the study.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 10.56 years with the mean weight of 38.55 kg. There were no extremely obese or any difficult airway cases in the study. There were 27 males and 23 females. In all the 50 patients, anaesthesia, surgery and the perioperative course were uneventful. The mean insertion score was 1.8. There was no dental injury in any of the cases. There were no side-effects or any dental pain in any of the patients.

Discussion

Mouth gags are an integral part of oropharyngeal surgeries, providing better exposure, visualisation and access to targeted anatomy. Various mouth gags have been defined since years, amongst which Boyle Davis mouth gag is a common variant used in adenotonsillectomy surgeries (8). Loss of teeth during tonsillectomy procedure is known complications which often tend to be due to mouth gag fixation and newly erupted lose teeth. This can manifest either due to excessive opening of the mouth gag or due to multiple attempts of placing the gag (9). Being a fairly common operative complication, informed consent for the injury to teeth, lips and gums is often taken pre-operatively in all the patients. Though, being a minor complication with no apparent morbidity, the loss or damage of a tooth during elective oral and oromaxillofacial surgeries, can be of a great cosmetic concern for the patient as well as for the family members. In order to avoid the above mentioned damage to the teeth, a modified or fabrication of the existing mouth gags was warranted (10).

Mouth gags used in various other fields of medicine such as dental surgeries have been modified lately to provide better protection and accommodation to the teeth without compromising the anatomical exposure (11). The new customised fabricated teeth guard provided proper protection to the upper jaw dentition in all the 50 patients that were studied. The advantages of this novel technique are many cost-effectiveness, easy availability of the substance and ease of use as it can be customised for each patient. Since, the material is not reusable, there are lesser chances of contamination. It can be moulded to the surgeon’s comfort for visualisation even in patients with prominent and crooked dentition which is the most important advantage, because this is not possible or feasible with many such existing materials and methods.

Proper replanting of an avulsed permanent tooth within 30 minutes increases the success of the prognosis by 90%. When the extra-alveolar time exceeds two hours the long-term success decreases by 5% (12).

Older generation mouth gags are notoriously known to cause slipping, sliding and dislocation in the mouth during the progress of surgery. This was more often seen when one-sided mouth gags were used (5). Various trials and modifications of the already existing mouth gags were tried in order to overcome these technical difficulties (5).

The Denhart mouth gag was a modification of Denhart-Hoefert mouth gag and it allowed technical changes in a sufficient and better way. There were additional pads pivotally mounted to keep the pad as close as possible to the patient’s alveolus or teeth during active and passive manipulation during surgeries. Furthermore, the pads could adjust to each and every type of teeth or even edentulous alveolus. The cusp of the teeth sliding into the hole of the pads along with the ends of the pivotal pads getting fixed to the interproximal area were the outstanding features of this modified gag. This adaptation enables more stability while providing maximum exposure of the oral cavity and oropharynx. The features of the pivotal pad allowed the gag to be moderately moved during the manipulations of intra oral surgery without the discomforts of sliding or dislocation. This turned out to be a benefit especially in oral, oropharyngeal and maxillofacial surgeries.

The new Denhart–Hoefert mouth gags along with its modifications were well prescribed for a more stable and sturdy intra oral placement into the oral cavity. The stable and fixed position contributes an easier, more manipulative and better manoeuvrable work field with a continuous undisturbed work flow during the surgical procedure. The possibility to fix additional instruments, like a tongue depressor provided increased efficacy of the instrument during otorhinolaryngology and dental maxillofacial surgeries (13). The need for a mouth gag with the addition of a new, easy, custom made and safe material that fit snugly and which offered full protection for every patient with varied dentition warranted an invention, which befits all the above said requirements.

However, in this study, it was planned to device a mouth-gag, which would be safe and efficacious. The custom-made putty was moulded onto the patient’s dentition perfectly with no compromise to the oropharyngeal space, thereby providing maximum vision for the surgical field. In cases of very prominent or crowded upper dentition, there was a need to insert more number of gauze pieces over the teeth where the gag would be fixed in order to attain maximum dental protection which thereby compromised the surgical space. This called for development of a cost-effective, feasible, easily mountable modification of an already existing mouth gag. In such an interest, the Boyle Davis mouth gag was fabricated at the tooth end with a soft putty impression material, to be used as a teeth guard.

Preparation of this protective material needs almost no time and no special training. The material is biocompatible, user friendly and cost-effective since only a very small quantity is required for each patient. Moreover, the material will not be reused and hence there is no contamination or need for sterilisation or disinfection. The putty index can be customised for each patient so that the accuracy of the fit and protection is ensured. The ease of introduction of this modified mouth gag remains the same as the conventional one. The putty material remains throughout the duration of surgery without any disintegration or obscuration of the surgical field. Routinely, in an attempt to provide protection to upper teeth and adjacent portion of the hard palate, materials like plastic tubing, gauze pieces, cotton, etc., have been used. However, they have drawbacks of their own like slippage, sliding and entanglement of gauze piece threads between the gaps of teeth, and difficulty in sterilisation for plastic tubings.

In this study, the authors wanted to showcase the advantages of this modified mouth gag, which is easily available, is surgeon friendly as well as patient friendly. This was a successfully conducted feasibility study. The fabricated mouth gag proved to be extremely beneficial to the patients, especially the ones with misaligned and protruded dentitions. This custom fabricated mouth gag which is cost effective too. A full kit of base and catalyst is Rs. 1000/- which can be used for about 150 patients. Hence, the cost for an individual patient is less than Rs.10.

Limitation(s)

Limited recent studies and articles to refer to in relation to this study, proved to be a limitation. Also, it did not use any other device for comparison. The aforementioned mean score for comfort level and ease of insertion score, are unvalidated scores derived from authors own personal experience over the decade.

Conclusion

An indigenously made elastomeric teeth guard is extremely effective in preventing dental injuries along with lip and gum injuries after application of Boyle Davis gags in cases of patients with improper dentition undergoing adenotonsillectomies under controlled general anaesthesia. This is cost effective and simple to produce with extreme ease and comfort for making and inserting. Also, there were no side-effects.

References

1.
Bühler A, Dirlmeier U, Ehrhardt H, Fuhrmann B, Hartmann W, Hösch Kaufmann UR, et al. Das Mittelalter, 1st edn. Konrad Theiss Verlag, Stuttgart. 2004; Pp. 254-61.
2.
Kravetz RE. A look back. Mouth gag. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(5):1339. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Liehn M, Nehse G. Mund-Kiefer-Gesichtschirurgie. In: Liehn M, Steinmüller L, Dühler R, editors. OP-Handbuch: Grundlagen, Instrumentarium, OP-Ablauf. 4. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2007. pp. 520-531. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Colt GH. The gag. Lancet. 1907;170(1) 1015-17. [crossref]
5.
Snow H. The "mammoth-tusk " gag for senile and edentulous jaws. Lancet. 1897;149(2):387. [crossref]
6.
Cotterill MJ. Gag, cheekretractor, and tongue depressor. Lancet. 1888;132(3405):1074. [crossref]
7.
Mason F. Mason's gag. Lancet. 1886;127:260. [crossref]
8.
Ameer F, Singh AK, Kumar S. The story of mouth gags. J Cleft Lip Palate Craniofac Anomal. 2014;1:70-77. [crossref]
9.
Bak NB. Accidental tooth avulsion during tonsillectomy. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2010;172(21):1611-12.
10.
Mistry D, Kelly G. Consent for tonsillectomy. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences. 2004;29(4):362-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Vazquez AR. Dental mouth gag and mirror. US 3171203A. 1963.
12.
Fouad AF, Abbott PV, Tsilingaridis G, Cohenca N, Lauridsen E, Bourguignon C, et al International association of dental traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: Avulsion of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(4):331-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Hoefert S. The evolution of mouth gags. Presentation of a new modificated denhart mouth gag. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2013;12(4):475-79. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52472.15914

Date of Submission: Sep 18, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 08, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 13, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 20, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 30, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 22, 2021 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com