Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 106748

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : NC01 - NC05` Full Version

A Study to Evaluate the Causes of Delayed Presentation for Cataract Surgery at a Tertiary Eye Centre, Odisha, India


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51450.15867
Matuli Das, Saswati Sen, Khushi Agrawal

1. Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Postgraduate, Department of Ophthalmology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Saswati Sen,
B3-105, Shreekhetra Residency, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
E-mail: swie2185@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Inspite of being advised surgery by doctor and several health schemes made available by the Government of India for the economically backward section, people still present late for surgery, inviting many complications in the long run.

Aim: To study the causes of delayed cataract surgery in Below Poverty Line (BPL) patients in a tertiary health care centre in Eastern India.

Materials and Methods: The present hospital-based and cross-sectional study included 58 patients who presented to the Outpatient and Emergency Department of a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India between December 2020 to April 2021. At presentation, detailed history was taken and patients were asked questions related to the cause of delay, which was categorised into- barriers to patient’s attitude and barriers related to cost, affordability and service delivery. Comprehensive ophthalmological examination for each and every patient was done. Routine blood investigations needed for cataract surgery were done. Surgery was done for all cases by a single surgeon and intraocular complications if any were noted.

Results: A total of 58 patients included in this study, females (57%) were more than males (43%). Majority of them were from semi urban areas (13.79%). A 60% were dependent on family members for their expenses. About 94.8% had government insurance schemes but still had financial constraints which caused delayed presentation. A 70.7% of people did not attend hospital due to negative peer group effects and almost 84.5% people had no direct means of transportation to the hospital. Fear of surgery (96.6%) and fear of contracting Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) (94.8%) were certain other factors which caused delay in presentation for surgery.

Conclusion: Through this study, certain possible reasons were found, catering to social, economic as well as factors like fear of surgery, negative peer pressure, financial constraints responsible for the delay in acceptance of cataract surgery in such a set up.

Keywords

Delayed treatment, Patient compliance, Socio-economic status

Cataract is the single most cause of preventable blindness. Globally, 33.4% of blindness and 18.4% of all moderate and severe vision loss which was roughly 10.8 million and 35.1 million respectively, was contributed by cataract alone (1). The numbers are more in low income countries than in high income countries. Cataract related blindness accounts for as high as 80% as per some studies in India (2),(3),(4),(5). Increase in life expectancy results in increase in the number of people aged 60 years or more, which in turn causes an increase in cataract number (6). This creates a treatment gap in developing countries like India. The treatment and subsequent visual prognosis in cataract cases is dependent on early surgical intervention. There has been vast improvement in the availability of hospitals providing eye health care as well as of the quality of cataract surgery (7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12). There are government insurance schemes available where, the cataract surgery is funded by the government but the surgical acceptance is still low amongst few sections of society. The study aims to find causes which are responsible for causing this delay.

Material and Methods

The present hospital-based cross-sectional study included 58 patients who presented to the Outpatient and Emergency Department of a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. It was carried out between December 2020 to April 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and ethical clearance was obtained. (KIIT/KIMS/IEC/396/2020). The study adhered to the tenets of the declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The study included patients of age group 50-80 years and both sexes, with complaints of decreased visual acuity, the principal cause of which was cataract in advanced stages. Exclusion criteria included patients who were not included in the BPL category and those whose surgery was delayed because of uncontrolled systemic diseases for long periods of time.

Study Procedure

Cataract was graded on the basis of World Health Organisation (WHO) cataract grading system where, greater than grade 2 (nuclear, cortical or posterior subcapsular) were considered advanced cataracts along with total or hypermature cataracts (13). The delay in surgery was considered to be the time interval between initial diagnosis of operable cataract and presentation to us for surgery.

At presentation, detailed history was taken and patients were asked questions related to the cause of delay as per the questionnaire framed [Appendix-1]. A set of robust questions based on present clinical experience were framed in a way that was sensitive to the information sought. Pretesting was done by initially circulating it among few patients and was internally validated by faculties of the department of research and development, ophthalmology and community medicine. Several similar studies were referred to for framing the questions (14),(15). Questions were broadly categorised into barriers related to patient’s attitude and barriers related to cost, affordability and service delivery. The purpose was to seek patient and attender’s knowledge about the disease, barriers pertaining to financial status of patients, social taboos they face, peer group effect or any other personal reason for not seeking out care in time. Questionnaire was distributed by the treating ophthalmologist and patients were given half an hour to read and answer the questions. Attenders were asked to help only when the patient was unable to fill the questionnaire due to decreased vision or illiteracy. Comprehensive ophthalmological examination for each and every patient was done. This included visual acuity examination, tonometry, gonioscopy, detailed fundus examination, B scan ultrasonography where required, lacrimal passage irrigation and biometry. Routine blood investigations needed for cataract surgery was done. Cataract surgery (phacoemulsification or small incision cataract surgery) was done for all cases under local anaesthesia by a single surgeon and intraocular complications, if any, were noted.

Statistical Analysis

Data was collected and analysed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v 23.0 software. Chi-square test was used to analyse data with p-value <0.05 considered to be significant.

Results

A total of 58 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the population was 64.8±10.06 years. A 32 (55.2%) of total patients were under 65 years age at presentation and 26 (44.8%) were over 65 years of age. The study group consisted of 25 (43%) males and 33 (57%) females. Majority of present patients were from rural areas. About 35 (60.34%) of total patients were associated with various co-morbidities like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, kidney and heart diseases and neurological problems. A 40 (68.97%) of present patients were presented for surgery after a delay of more than two years (Table/Fig 1).

On analysis of the occupational profile of the patients we found that maximum i.e., 35 (60%) of present patients had no active income of their own and were dependant on family members as a source of income. A 13 (22%) were farmers, 9 (16%) daily wage labourers and only 1 (2%) had businesses of their own.

A total of 53 (91.4%) patients felt their cataract was not hard enough and they could wait further before surgery. These are the patients who presented with vision <6/60. About 41 (70.7%) people gave old age as an excuse for not coming up for surgery (Table/Fig 2).

Conveyance was a major problem for a majority of present study population. Maximum of present patients (94.85%) lived far away from hospitals where surgical services for cataract were available. Out of them about 49 (84.5%) did not have access to direct transport facility to the hospitals. Almost 48 (82.75%) patients lived in remote villages which were not linked to main roads. This data sheds light on the availability of affordable health care at arm’s length (Table/Fig 3).

All patients in present study group underwent cataract surgery, two persons had posterior capsular rent and two had iridodialysis which were managed successfully. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative visual acuity using chi-square test showed significant p-value of 0.012 for patients who presented after a delay of more than two years while it was not that significant for patients presenting after a delay of less than two years (0.568) (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Since, cataract is a significant cause of preventable blindness, several national and international programmes have been implemented in India to support infrastructure and manpower to make it possible. The National Programme for the Control of blindness (NPCB) in India is being implemented in a decentralised manner through District health societies and aimed to reduce the prevalence of blindness from 1.4-0.3% by 2020 (16). We still have a long way to go. In order to achieve the set goals there has been noticeable improvement in cataract services as well as increase in the number of cataract surgeries, as per some studies (12).

It is well understood that the earlier the surgery for cataract, the better is the visual prognosis (17),(18). But there still remain several social, financial and knowledge related barriers as evidenced by present study.

Even with a small study group, the number of females was more than males in present study. Though not significant, this in some way reflects the gender bias deep rooted in present society and dependence on male members of the family in the rural and semi-urban areas. Ignoring female health care can be yet another social peril that we still face in the present era. Most of them were house wives and many of the males were also dependant on a single earning member of the family which was an obvious constraint in seeking healthcare. In cases where the earning member developed cataract it was even more difficult for the fear of loss of pay for the days the patient would be hospitalised. Hence, gender bias and financial problems still remain forerunners as the cause of delay in seeking healthcare (18).

Almost, all of present patients were scared of the surgery and hence presented late. Maximum felt that the cataract was not mature enough and they were able to manage their day to day activities. Many of these patients delayed surgery because they were able to see with the other eye. This brings into light the knowledge gap that exists in the population. In present study, patients who presented with better preoperative vision were able to retain good vision as compared to people who had poor preoperative vision and studies have already proved that earlier (surgical intervention yields better results (17). This corroborates with present study where the preoperative visual acuity had a greater bearing on the final visual outcome than the time of presentation. Looking at the type of present study population who were mostly females or in the elderly age group, it can be assumed that their visual needs and expectations were not very urgent for their family members.

In 29 patients of present study, other eyes was already operated which was almost 50% of present study population. They could manage their daily chores satisfactorily also did not turn up. This brings us to the issue of peer group effect. Inspite of surgery in one eye being successful, people wanted validation and support from other people in their area which included spouses, family members, friends and neighbours to seek eye care. These factors have been noted to affect health seeking behaviour in the western countries too (19).

Good and accessible transportation facilities are very important while dealing with chronic diseases as well as diseases requiring surgical intervention because of the need for follow-up. Most of present study population was from semi-urban and rural areas and conveyance was a major issue for them. Most of the families did not have vehicles of their own to commute to the hospital. Not being directly connected to the main road caused additional problems as patients had to change two or three public modes of transportation to reach hospitals. This caused inconvenience as well as monetary and time loss to the patient’s attendants and can be a major deterrent to follow up for surgery. This fact holds true both for developing and developed countries (20),(21),(22).

In the current scenario with the ongoing COVID-19 scare, routine health care services were deeply affected (23),(24). This was yet another reason for patients in our study to postpone surgery. Very few patients of present study group had the fear of death which shows that they had enough knowledge to not link mortality with routine cataract surgeries. The cataract surgeries that were performed at present centre had very few complications and all of them were managed with a good final visual outcome.

Ironically, though most of the people in present study were covered by several government insurance schemes, they still did not present at the appropriate time. Hence, financial constraint though a major factor is not the only one. Several social taboos, peer group effect, lack of adequate transportation, lack of knowledge about the disease process as well as the ease of availability of health services are equally responsible.

With several projects and treatable nature of the disease, herculean efforts are being made both at national and international level to tackle the problem. There is still a need to make people aware that affordable services ensuring good surgical outcomes are easily available. People need to have faith on the healthcare system and need to be educated more about the disease process and the complications associated with delayed treatment as well as several schemes made available by the government for the poor for a favourable outcome. Also, cataract surgery by and large has become a day care procedure where people do not have to stay overnight for surgical intervention and have fewer follow-ups (25). Taking all these factors into account the treating doctor has to consider not only the clinical factors but also the socio-economic factors and frame the line of counselling accordingly.

Cataract is the leading cause of blindness in the world and complete visual recovery is possible by surgical correction at the right time. Delay in surgical correction leads to complications and thus negatively affects the visual prognosis. There are a lot of social and financial barriers which influence the patient’s decision to opt for timely surgical correction. They need to be explored and addressed.

Limitation(s)

The study suffers from limitations like small sample size and being based in a single hospital. All factors considered above are interdependent and influence each other. The collective effect of the admixture of all factors affects the patient’s decision at the end. Hence, multicentric studies and with a bigger sample size can give a clearer picture. In third world countries, a number of factors affect the health seeking behaviour. We discuss several demographic, socio-economic factors or ignorance or taboos leading to delay in seeking eye care. This results in unrequited vision loss which could have been easily salvaged.

Conclusion

With advancement of medical technology life expectancy is increasing. Though the burden of cataract thus increases too, there is no dearth of skill and services to tackle the problem. Being a developing country the Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) aspect as far as cataract is concerned needs to be addressed by means of better counselling and outreach camps. Ours is a tertiary level, teaching hospital that caters mainly to low socio-economical patients and the schemes made available to these patients decrease the out of pocket expenditure for surgeries. Though, we have covered a small sample, still we have been able to uncover certain basic deficiencies in our system. Development of infrastructure is important but making people aware of these developments and of the services available is equally important. In addition, awareness of the cataract disease process and its treatment and prognosis needs to be spread at ground level. This will help us eliminate preventable blindness to a large extent.

References

1.
Khairallah M, Kahloun R, Bourne R, Limburg H, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, et al. Number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract worldwide and in world regions,1990 to 2010. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:6762-69 [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Vilas K, Prasad MN, et al. Blindness in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:908 16.
3.
Vajpayee RB, Joshi S, Saxena R, Gupta SK. Epidemiology of cataract in India: Combating plans and strategies. Ophthalmic Res. 1999;31(2):86-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Murthy G, Gupta SK, John N, Vashist P. Current status of cataract blindness and Vision 2020: The right to sight initiative in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56(6):489-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Thulasiraj RD, Nirmalan PK, Ramakrishnan R, Krishandas R, Manimekalai TK, Baburajan NP, et al. Blindness and vision impairment in a rural South Indian Population: The Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1491-98. [crossref]
6.
Scommegna P. India's ageing population Available from: http://www.prb.org /Publications / Reports/2012/india-older-population.aspx.[last accessed 13th may 2021].
7.
Brian G, Taylor H. Cataract blindness- challenges for the 21s century. Bull WHO. 2001;79:249-56.
8.
Rabiu MM. Cataract blindness and barriers to uptake of cataract surgery in a rural community of northern Nigeria. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:776-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Rotchford AP, Rotchford KM, Mthethwa LP, Johnson GJ. Reasons for poor cataract surgery uptake-a qualitative study in rural South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2002;7:288-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Vaidyanathan K, Limburg H, Foster A, Pandey RM. Changing trends in barriers to cataract surgery in India. Bull WHO. 1999;77:104-09.
11.
Fletcher AE, Donoghue M, Devavaram J, Thulasiraj RD, Scott S, Abdalla M, et al. Low uptake of eye services in rural India: A challenge for programs of blindness prevention. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1393-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Bharath B, Krishnaiah S, Imtiaz A, Ramani RV. Prevalence and determinants of cataract surgical coverage in India: findings from a population-based study; International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(2):320-27. [crossref]
13.
Thylefors B, Chylack LT Jr, Konyama K, Sasaki K, Sperduto R, Taylor HR, West S; WHO Cataract Grading Group. A simplified cataract grading system. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2002;9(2):83-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Mwende J, Bronsard A, Mosha M, Bowman R, Geneau R, Courtright P. Delay in presentation to hospital for surgery for congenital and developmental cataract in Tanzania. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(11):1478-82. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Dharmadhikari S, Bakare PN, Deshpande M, Hegade A, Kesari A. Study on barriers causing delay in cataract surgery of bilateral cataract blind at a tertiary eye care center in urban India. J Clin Ophthalmol Res. 2017;5:69-72.
16.
Vemparala R, Gupta P. National Programme for Control of Blindness (NPCB) in the 12th five year plan: An overview. Delhi J Ophthalmol. 2017;27:290-92. [crossref]
17.
Limburg H, Kumar R, Bachani D. Monitoring and evaluating cataract intervention in India. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:951-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Mhalu G, Weiss MG, Hella J, Mhimbira F, Mahongo E, Schindler C, et al. Explaining patient delay in healthcare seeking and loss to diagnostic follow-up among patients with presumptive tuberculosis in Tanzania: A mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:217. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Eley NT, Namey E, McKenna K, Johnson AC, Guest G. Beyond the individual: Social and cultural influences on the health-seeking behaviours of African American Men. Am J Mens Health. 2019;13(1):1557988319829953. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Syed ST, Gerber BS, Sharp LK. Traveling towards disease: Transportation barriers to health care access. J Community Health. 2013;38(5):976-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Call KT, McAlpine DD, Johnson PJ, Beebe TJ, McRae JA, Song Y. Barriers to care among American Indians in public health care programs. Medical Care. 2006;44(6):595-600 [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Arcury TA, Preisser JS, Gesler WM, Powers JM. Access to transportation and health care utilization in a rural region. The Journal of Rural Health: Official Journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association. 2005;21(1):31-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Nair AG, Gandhi RA, Natarajan S. Effect of COVID-19 related lockdown on ophthalmic practice and patient care in India: Results of a survey. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(5):725-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Babu N, Kohli P, Mishra C, Sen S, Arthur D, Chhablani D, et al. To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdown on patient care at a tertiary-care ophthalmology institute. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:1540-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P. Do we need day-1 postoperative follow-up after cataract surgery? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257:855-61. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51450.15867

Date of Submission: Jul 18, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Sep 28, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 15, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 20, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 13, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 03, 2021 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com