Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 7856

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : QC05 - QC08 Full Version

Evaluation of Protein Carbonyl and Vitamin C in Seminal Plasma of Infertile Male: A Hospital-based Study in Bengali Population


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52744.15839
Kesab Rakshit, Jayanta Kumar Rout, Tulika Jha, Sandeep Jain, Anil Baran Singha Mahapatra

1. Infertility Medical Officer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, MJN Medical College and Hospital, Coochbehar, West Bengal, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rampurhat Government Medical College and Hospital, Birbhum, West Bengal, India. 4. Ex. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Biochemistry, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 5. Ex. Professor and Head, Department of Physiology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sandeep Jain,
Staff Doctors Hostel, Inside National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory
Diseases (LRS TB Hospital, Mehrauli), Shree Aurobindo Sarani, New Delhi-110030, India.
E-mail: jainsandeepdr@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Male infertility has been coupled with the imbalance between production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and antioxidant (e.g., vitamin C) level. Elevated concentrations of ROS in the semen can lead to oxidative protein damage as they counter with the amino acids’ side chains in the protein, leading to the production of carbonyl groups.

Aim: To assess if there is any difference of seminal plasma Protein Carbonyl (PC) and vitamin C level in male infertile and fertile subjects in the midst of their correlation with other relevant seminal parameters.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based case-control study of a Bengali population. Semen samples of 124 males (group A; 68 infertile males, group B; 56 fertile males) were tested. Seminal fluid analysis was done with Makler counting chamber. PC and vitamin C were measured by Levin’s and Roe’s photometric methods respectively. To evaluate the differences in the mean ranks of these parameters Mann-Whitney U test was used.

Results: Out of 124 male subjects, 68 infertile (55%) termed as cases and 56 fertile (45%) were termed as controls with mean age of cases (32.81±5.02) and controls (33.29±5.53). Both in group A and group B sperm count was positively correlated with motility and vitamin C but negatively correlated with PC at significant level p<0.05. Statistically significant differences of mean ranks of these parameters (sperm count: 52.82 and 74.26, motility: 52.10 Vs 75.13, PC: 76.57 and 45.41, vitamin C:55.99 and 70.40, Mann-Whitney U:1245, 1197, 947 and 1461, respectively) between the two groups were found. Hence, indicate that in infertile subjects the balance between PC and vitamin C is disturbed.

Conclusion: Assessment of oxidative status may serve the clinician in additional management of idiopathic male infertility.

Keywords

Antioxidant, Ascorbic acid, Reactive oxygen species, Sperm count

Infertility is defined as incapability to conceive after one year of unprotected intercourse and it affects 7% of male population and 8-10% of couples (1). The evaluation of male infertility is frequently underestimated or delayed. A synchronised assessment of the infertile male using standardised measures improves both diagnostic exactness and the results of subsequent management in terms of efficiency, risk and costs (2). A 30-80% of infertile male produce excessive ROS in their ejaculate. Takeshima T et al., proposed the term "Male Oxidative Stress Infertility (MOSI)" to describe Oxidative Stress (OS) associated male infertility for this strong connection between OS and male infertility (3). OS is defined as an inequity between levels of ROS and Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC). If the balance is in favour of ROS generating system compared to ROS scavenging, the resulting condition is known as OS (4). Elevated concentrations of ROS in the semen can lead to oxidative protein damage, as they react with the amino acids’ side chains in the protein, leading to the production of carbonyl groups (4). The toxic effects of ROS on sperm function can be estimated by lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation and nuclear Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) damage estimation (4),(5).

Stress and decrease in antioxidants was found to play a significant part in reducing the fertilising potential of male infertile subjects (6). When regulated suitably, ROS functions effectively; however, when uninhibited, they signify key players in male factor infertility. Mechanisms accountable for this comprise oxidative damage of sperm lipid membranes, damage to gamete DNA both by gene mutation and by direct breakdown of the DNA backbone, mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptotic cell death (7). The spermatozoon is an extremely dedicated cell, whose main function is to carry the intact male genetic substance into the oocyte. During its production and transit all through male and female reproductive tracts, sperm cells are internally and externally bounded by ROS, which are formed from both endogenous and exogenous sources. While low amounts of ROS are recognised to be necessary for vital physiological sperm processes, such as acrosome reaction and sperm-oocyte interaction, high levels of those species cause misbalanced antioxidant: oxidant molecules, generating OS, which is one of the most destructive factors that affect sperm function and lower male fertility potential (8).

Antioxidants are substances which at a low concentration can significantly delay or prevent oxidative damage of an oxidizable substrate. Though weak, there are antioxidants in seminal plasma which protect the sperm against the damaging effects of ROS (9),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12).

After doing a tedious literature search, authors found several data related to PC and vitamin C levels of seminal plasma in different groups of population globally. This type of finding may be due to different socio-economic status and ethnicity. Considering this the present study was being proposed involving hospital-based male infertile Bengali population.

Material and Methods

This was a hospital-based, non interventional case-control study conducted in the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Samples were collected from the Infertility clinic of the same institution. The study was conducted for 18 months (January 2014-June 2015) after getting the clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (IEC: 17/12/13). The study followed the guidelines of the Helsinki declaration of 2009 in every aspects of the study.

Male infertile subjects who gave their informed written consent voluntarily at the infertility clinic after fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Sample size was decided depending upon the previous studies (1),(13).

Inclusion criteria: A total of 124 men (group A: 68 infertile and group B: 56 fertile) between the age group of 20-45 years were taken into the study, who had a history of infertility persisting longer than one year.

Exclusion criteria: History of smoking habits. Consumption of alcohol and tobacco chewing. Subjects suffering from diabetes mellitus, hypertension, various infectious diseases including Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), cryptorchidism, varicocele. Taking drugs like vitamin C, vitamin E and glutathione supplementation. Semen samples having more than one million leucocytes per mL.

Procedure

Semen samples were collected by masturbation into a sterile, wide mouthed container after 72 hours of sexual abstinence. It was then allowed to liquefy at room temperature approx. 37°C for at least 30-60 minutes. After liquefaction samples were analysed for the following:

A) Physical characters- volume, liquefaction time and pH.
B) Microscopic characters- sperm count (million/mL), motility (%)- progressive/non progressive/non motile, morphology (%)- normal/abnormal.
C) Biochemical characters- measurement of PC by Levine’s method (14),(15) and Measurement of vitamin C by Roe’s photometric method (16).

Measurement of Protein Carbonyl (PC) content: Photometric Method (14),(15)-

A 25 µL of seminal plasma were taken in two (control (C)/fertile and test (T)/infertile) tubes. To which 100 µL of 20% of Tri-Chloro Acetic Acid (TCA) solution was added. It was mixed and then centrifuged at 5000 rpm (revolution per minute) for 10 minutes. To the pellets separated after centrifugation in both the tubes 500 µL 2(N) Hydrochloric acid (HCL) and 500 µL of DNPH (Dinitrophenylhydrazine) was added to C and T tube, respectively. They were mixed thoroughly, waited for 15 minutes and this part is repeated for five times. Again, 100 µL of 20% TCA solution were added to the respective C and T tubes. They were mixed and centrifuged to get the pellet again and the supernatants were discarded now. A 500 µL each of 99% ethyl alcohol and ethyl acetate were added to each tube. They were mixed thoroughly and centrifuged, followed by discarding the supernatant. This procedure was repeated thrice. After that 1.5 mL protein dissolving solution was mixed thoroughly with 1 mL micro-pipette and kept for 20 minutes for better dissolution. Subsequently, the absorbence of both the test and control tubes was read at 370 nm in the spectrophotometer with 2(N) HCl as blank. The carbonyl content was calculated depending on the molar extinction coefficient of DNPH (?=2.2×104 cm M-1) and expressed as nanomoles per mg of protein. Seminal protein estimation was done using Lowry’s method (17),(18).

Measurement of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C): Photometric method (16),(19)- A 0.5 mL of seminal plasma from each samples were added to 2 mL of meta-phosphoric acid (freshly prepared: 6 gm/dL) in a test tube, mixed well and centrifuged (2500 g-10 min). From each tube 1.2 mL of clear supernatant was pipetted into Teflon lined, screw cap test tube. A 1.2 mL of each concentration of working calibrators (prepared daily, stock is 50 mg/dL) were then added to above test tubes (made in duplicate). A 1.2 mL of metaphosphoric acid as was used for this estimation. Next to this 0.4 mL of dinitrophenylhydrazine-thiourea-copper sulfate reagent (5 mL 5 gm/L thiourea and 5 mL 0.6 gm/dL copper sulphate solution mixed with 100 mL of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine solution: 2 gm/L DNPH in 4.5 mol/L sulphuric acid and diluted upto final volume of 500 mL) were added to all tubes. All tubes were then mixed and incubated in a water bath at 37°C for three hours. Then the tubes were removed from water bath and chilled for 10 minutes in an ice bath. While mixing, 2.0 mL of cold sulfuric acid (12 mol/L) were added and mixed in a vortex mixture. Spectrophotometer was adjusted with the blank to read zero absorbance at 520 nm and all the readings were noted. The concentration of every working calibrators were plotted versus absorbance values.
Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis were done by windows based Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 (inc. Chicago II, USA) and MedCalc version 11.3 softwares. Goodness of fit measure also done by D’Agostino Pearson test to find out the normality of data. Correlation of data within a group was performed by doing Spearman correlation test. Sample’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test was performed appropriately to find out the statistical significance of mean and mean ranks respectively between groups. A p-value of <0.05 (confidence interval=95%) was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Out of 124 male subjects, 68 infertile (55%) termed as cases and 56 fertile (45%) were termed as controls. No statistically significant difference between the age distribution of cases (32.81±5.02) and controls (33.29±5.53) groups (t=0.503, p=0.616) was observed. Hence, all the male subjects being selected for this study were age matched. The other parameters are shown in (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3).

The data were not in the same agreement of the Normality. Hence, the authors have done non parametric analysis to evaluate their statistical significance further.

To find out the non parametric correlation of different parameters with sperm count in cases and controls authors performed Spearman’s rho correlation. In both cases and controls group, it was found that sperm count is positively correlated with motility and vitamin C but negatively correlated with PC at significant level (Table/Fig 4).

There was significant difference in between cases and controls of sperm count (1245.5, p<0.001), motility (1197, p<0.001), PC (947, p<0.001) and vitamin C (1461.5, p<0.05) (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

Infertility is a worldwide health problem concerning about 15% of couples. More or less half of the infertility cases are connected to male factors. The OS, which refers to an inequity in levels of ROS and antioxidants, is one of the main causes of infertility in men. ROS is necessary in a small concentration for the physiological role of sperm including the capacitation, hyperactivation and acrosomal reaction. Although, high levels of ROS can lead to infertility through not only by lipid peroxidation or DNA damage but inactivation of enzymes and oxidation of proteins in spermatozoa. OS is primarily caused by factors coupled with lifestyle however, immature spermatozoa, inflammatory factors, genetic mutations and altering levels of sex hormones are other major causes of ROS (20).

PC was selected in this study due to its early formation by ROS and stability compared to other biomarkers among oxidatively modified proteins (21) and vitamin C as the antioxidant of choice due to its accurate estimation (22).

In a study conducted by Saraniya A et al., involving subjects for microscopically abnormal (n=26) semen and normal semen (n=24) found significantly higher levels of PC in seminal plasma of abnormal semen (13). They also found that the percentage of non motile spermatozoa had a significant (p<0.01) positive correlation with PC (r=0.49). Similarly, present study also found that in infertile subjects sperm count was positively correlated with motility (rho=0.428, p<0.001) and negatively correlated with PC (rho=-0.601, p<0.001). The mean±SD of seminal PC in infertile males were 2.37±1.39 nanomol/mg of total protein and in fertile males 1.40±1.59 nanomol/mg of total protein. The intergroup comparison of seminal PC levels have shown that the difference of the mean rank of PC (76.57 Vs 45.41) was statistically significant (p<0.001). Thus, infertile individuals have elevated PC levels.

In a study by Al Smadi MA et al., they found that sperm motility and laboratory Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) outcomes were affected negatively by elevated concentrations of PC in the semen (4). Hence, this finding also supports that semen quality is inversely related with the PC concentration as was found by Saraniya A et al., (Table/Fig 6) (13).

Mean±SD of seminal vitamin C in infertile males is 0.768±0.51 mg/mL and in fertile males is 1.1421±0.89 mg/mL in the present study and are positively correlated with sperm count in both of the groups (?=0.348 and 0.504 respectively, p<0.001). The intergroup evaluation of seminal vitamin C levels have revealed that the disparity of the mean concentration of vitamin C between both the groups is statistically significant (p<0.001), i.e., the fertile individuals have elevated vitamin C levels. PC is a marker of oxidatively damaged protein and this damage might harm their role in maintaining the motility of spermatozoa and affect fertilisation. Cytotoxic PC may be the reason of poor motility and low sperm count. PC showed a negative correlation (?=-0.601, p<0.001 in cases and ?=-0.652, p<0.001 in controls) with sperm count. This means in infertile subjects the balance between PC (indicator of oxidative damage) and vitamin C (antioxidant) is disturbed. The fall in vitamin C in infertile semen and its correlation with PC point towards that the rise in vitamin C might be a defensive response of body to abate the effect of ROS. In fact, vitamin C is a water soluble ROS scavenger with high potency and found in concentrations 10-fold in seminal plasma than serum (23), protecting human spermatozoa against endogenous oxidative damage by neutralising hydroxyl, superoxide and hydrogen peroxide radicals and preventing sperm agglutination (24). Considerably reduced concentrations are seen in semen samples with excess ROS (9) these observations are shown in the present study.

By this study, the authors want to state that in cases where all the seminal parameters were normal but still the subject remains infertile (idiopathic male infertility) comes under the purview of functional assay. Amongst this estimation of OS status, pro-oxidants and antioxidant level is crucial. Though chemiluminescence assay is presently under discussion but, this study is more relevant in for the developing world as it is cost friendly with limited infrastructure. Last but not the least, it throws some light over individual oxidants in comparison to composite ROS-TAC score. Further studies will show the clinical importance of the findings of this present work in a resource poor set-up to a clinician.

Limitation(s)

After initiation of therapy, a more detailed follow-up was beyond the scope of the present study. A prospective study with more planning and greater control over confounding variables is needed to generate stronger evidences. Modern techniques may be applied.

Conclusion

Antioxidant regime of vitamin C can be a helpful therapeutic approach to overcome the problem of OS associated with male infertility due to lack of antioxidants and its protective role in semen.

References

1.
Singh A, Jahan N, Radhakrishnan G, Banerjee BD. To evaluate the efficacy of combination antioxidant therapy on oxidative stress parameters in seminal plasma in the male infertility. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(7):QC14-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. An update on the clinical assessment of the infertile male. [corrected]. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(4):691-700. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Takeshima T, Usui K, Mori K, Asai T, Yasuda K, Kuroda S, et al. Oxidative stress and male infertility. Reprod Med Biol. 2021;20(1):41-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Al Smadi MA, Hammadeh ME, Batiha O, Al Sharu E, Altalib MM, Jahmani MY, et al. Elevated seminal protein carbonyl concentration is correlated with asthenozoospermia and affects adversely the laboratory intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes. Andrologia. 2021;2021:e14232. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Koppers AJ, De Iuliis GN, Finnie JM, McLaughlin EA, Aitken RJ. Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(8):3199-207.
6.
Rehman R, Amjad S, Tariq H, Zahid N, Akhter M, Ashraf M. Oxidative stress and male infertility: A cross sectional study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(3):461-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Ritchie C, Ko EY. Oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of male infertility. Andrologia. 2021;53(1):e13581. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Ribas-Maynou J, Yeste M. Oxidative stress in male infertility: Causes, effects in assisted reproductive techniques, and protective support of antioxidants. Biology (Basel). 2020;9(4):77. Doi: 10.3390/biology9040077. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Lewis SE, Sterling ES, Young IS, Thompson W. Comparison of individual antioxidants of sperm and seminal plasma in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(1):142-47. [crossref]
10.
Maneesh M, Jayalekshmi H. Role of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants on pathophysiology of male reproduction. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2006;21(2):80-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Sikka SC. Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in andrology and assisted reproductive technology. J Androl. 2004 Jan-Feb;25(1):5-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Garibaldi S, Valentini S, Aragno I, Pronzato MA, Traverso N, Odetti P. Plasma protein oxidation and antioxidant defense during aging. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2001;71(6):332-38. [crossref]
13.
Saraniya A, Koner BC, Doureradjou P, Selvaraj N, Shivagourou V. Altered malondialdehyde, protein carbonyl and sialic acid levels in seminal plasma of microscopically abnormal semen. Andrologia. 2008;40(1):56-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Levine RL, Garland D, Oliver CN, Amici A, Climent I, Lenz AG, et al. Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:464-78. [crossref]
15.
Levine RL, Williams JA, Stadtman ER, Shacter E. Carbonyl assays for determination of oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1994;233:346-57. [crossref]
16.
Roe JH, Kuether CA. A Color reaction for dehydroascorbic acid useful in the determination of vitamin C. Science. 1942;95(2455):77. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Sengupta S, Chattopadhyay MK. Lowry's method of protein estimation: Some more insights. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1993;45(1):80. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Zimmermann R, Lorenz R, Hacker R. Use of Lowry's folin method for plasma protein determinations. Z Med Lab Diagn. 1985;26(7):378-82.
19.
Rowlands R, Kamasastri PV, Joseph M, Row M. Studies in ascorbic acid. Indian J Med Res. 1955;43(4):627-35.
20.
Barati E, Nikzad H, Karimian M. Oxidative stress and male infertility: Current knowledge of pathophysiology and role of antioxidant therapy in disease management. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(1):93-113. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Song YR, Kim JK, Lee HS, Kim SG, Choi EK. Serum levels of protein carbonyl, a marker of oxidative stress, are associated with overhydration, sarcopenia and mortality in hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):281. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Sayed Elnenaey E, Soliman R. A sensitive colorimetric method for estimation of ascorbic acid. Talanta. 1979;26(12):1164-66. [crossref]
23.
Jungck EC, Maddock WO, Ban Brogen JT, Heller CG. Blood vitamins A, C and E and seminal fluid vitamin C in human male sterility. Fed Proc. 1947;6(1 Pt 2):139.
24.
Fraga CG, Motchnik PA, Shigenaga MK, Helbock HJ, Jacob RA, Ames BN. Ascorbic acid protects against endogenous oxidative DNA damage in human sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(24):11003-06. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52744.15839

Date of Submission: Oct 06, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 26, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 14, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 09, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 13, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 16, 2021 (23%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com