Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 42663

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : TC11 - TC14 Full Version

Multiparametric Cranial Ultrasound Evaluation of Normal Neonatal Cerebral Ventricular Dimensions to Establish Nomograms in the Eastern Indian Population: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/53140.15856
Alayna Reddy Kandadhi , Satyaswarup Jena , Niranjan Sahu

1. Senior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, SOA Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, SOA Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, SOA Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Niranjan Sahu,
Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Institute of Medical Sciences and
SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar-751003, Odisha, India.
E-mail: niranjanradiologist@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) filled ventricles and their connecting foramina make up the brain’s ventricular system. Ventricles hold around a fifth of an adult’s CSF volume, approximately 20-25 mL. Two lateral ventricles and midline third and fourth ventricles make up the ventricular system.

Aim: To study normal neonatal cerebral ventricular dimensions to develop reference ranges in the Eastern Indian population.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based observational cross-sectional study carried out on 189 neonate in the Department of Radiodiagnosis in collaboration with the Department of Neonatology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. Measurement of ventricular size is of prime importance in diagnosing posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation and evaluating the need for intervention. Authors have studied Frontal Horn Width (FHW), Thalamo-Occipital Distance (TOD), Third Ventricle Width (TVW), Ventriculo-Hemispheric Ratio (VHR) and Levene index to establish nomograms showing normal reference range. Linear regression model was used for correlation.

Results: The FHW in present study showed a linear increase in the size with a corresponding increase in the gestational age, from 1.38 mm at 33 weeks to 1.59 mm at 40 weeks of gestation with a weak positive correlation. The TOD showed negligible change with increasing gestational age, from 17.24 mm at 33 weeks to 17.17 mm at 40 weeks. The TVW study showed a slight increase in width with increasing age, from 1.20 mm at 33 weeks to 1.45 mm at 40 weeks gestation. The VHR showed a negligible change with increasing gestational age, from 0.120 at 33 weeks to 0.100 at 40 weeks. The Levene index showed a slight increase, from 10.30 at 33 weeks to 11.64 at 40 weeks of gestation.

Conclusion: Neurosonogram has valid implications for measurement of ventricular size in diagnosing pathologic ventricular dilatation and for evaluating the need for intervention. Nomograms for different parameters (FHW, TOD, TVW, VHR and Levene index) as well as corresponding reference ranges are established for normal preterm and term neonates.

Keywords

Cranial ultrasound nomogram, Frontal horn width, Levene index, Thalamo-occipital distance, Third ventricular width, Ventriculo-hemispheric ratio

The CSF filled ventricles and their connecting foramina make up the brain’s ventricular system. The ependymal cells that border the ventricular system generate CSF, which flows from lateral ventricles to third ventricle through the foramen of Monro, from third ventricle to fourth ventricle via the Sylvius aqueduct, bilaterally into the cerebellopontine angle cisterns through the foramen of Luschka, and into the cisterna magna through the foramen of Magendie. Ventricles hold around a fifth of an adult’s CSF volume, approximately 20-25 mL (1). Two lateral ventricles, a midline third ventricle, and a fourth ventricle make up the ventricular system. Any dilatation of ventricles is considered as ventriculomegaly. Hydrocephalus refers to ventriculomegaly of the obstructive cause or enlarged ventricles associated with increased intracranial pressure. There are many causes of ventricular dilatation or hydrocephalus: subarachnoid haemorrhage, infective meningitis, normal pressure hydrocephalus, choroid plexus papilloma, ex-vacuo hydrocephalus, posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. Hydrocephalus is also associated with various congenital anomalies in newborns with adverse clinical outcomes and has a prevalence of approximately 0.3-22 per 1,000 live births (2),(3),(4).

Periventricular Haemorrhage (PVH) is most common in premature infants and usually occurs in the first week of life. From various studies, it is hypothesised as secondary to hypoxic-ischaemic reperfusion injury of the germinal matrix (5),(6). In premature infants, the germinal matrix is richly perfused with fragile vessels, vulnerable to ischaemic insult, and reperfusion leads to haemorrhage. The incidence of PVH decreases with increasing gestational age. PVH appears to be rare after 34 weeks of gestation. The reason for the decrease is due to the involution of the vascular germinal matrix. Other factors may influence the incidence of PVH, like the birth weight <1500 grams. Many infants are asymptomatic and only found on regular neurosonogram. PVH, when large, can extend into the ventricles and obstruct drainage, causing posthaemorrhagic dilatation. Venous haemorrhagic infarct is an impending outcome without early recognition in these cases. Posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation represents the major threat in preterm infants. Following a significant germinal matrix-intraventricular haemorrhage, about 75% of premature babies have posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. In infants with progressive ventricular dilatation, cerebral haemodynamics, oxygenation and prevention of further brain injury has been proven to be achieved by drainage of CSF (6),(7).

Measurement of ventricular size is of prime importance in diagnosing posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation and evaluating the need for intervention (8),(9),(10). Neurosonogram avails measurement of the lateral ventricles, in addition to diagnosing ex-vacuo dilatation of ventricles in preterm infants due to periventricular white matter atrophy. Therefore, transcranial ultrasound (neurosonogram) since its clinical introduction in the 1970’s, has been widely used and has become indispensable in neonatal intensive care units for screening preterm infants for intracranial haemorrhage, congenital and acquired brain lesions (11),(12),(13),(14). Transcranial ultrasound is the only choice in case of a bedside, critically ill infants, in spite of advances like Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), reason being, transcranial ultrasound does not produce any ionising radiation, also does not require sedation, unlike CT and MRI, which has the risk of producing ionising radiation and require sedation for uncompromised imaging (15),(16). Quality of transcranial ultrasound has improved with time leading to high resolution, faster imaging and delineation of important brain structures, digital display and backup. The detailed structural assessment requires magnification of selected areas with higher resolution megahertz adjustments (17),(18). The main aim here was to study normal neonatal cerebral ventricular dimensions to develop reference ranges in the Eastern Indian population.

Material and Methods

This was a hospital-based observational cross-sectional study carried out in the Department of Radiodiagnosis in collaboration with the Department of Neonatology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, from September 2018 to September 2020. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) with reference number DRI/IMS.SH/SOA/180453.

Inclusion criteria: The study population of 189 normal cases comprising of 101 preterm (33-36 weeks gestation) and 88 term (37-40 weeks gestation) neonates were included.

Exclusion criteria: A neonate with an open wound or recent surgical incision near the area being imaged, neonate with changes in blood flow pattern due to heart disease or irregular heart rhythms, case of hydrocephalus, periventricular leukomalacia, intracranial haemorrhage were excluded.

Study Procedure

Transducer used: A 7.5-MHz or higher transducer in a premature infant; 5-MHz transducer necessary to allow for adequate sound penetration of a larger infant head; High-frequency transducers (up to 5-12 MHz) to provide high-quality images for scanning of near-field pathology. The approach was generally via the anterior fontanel in both coronal and sagittal planes. Other approaches done were posterior fontanel, mastoid fontanel and temporal fontanel. For ventricular size assessment, five parameters were measured to establish a normal reference range. These were FHW, TOD, TVW, VHR and Levene index.

The FHW is defined as the diagonal width of the frontal horns measured at the widest point in the coronal plane. In present study, the frontal horn was approached via anterior fontanelle and width was measured in the coronal plane in all the infants (19). TOD is the thalamus’s distance to the dorsal horn’s tip (posterior horn/occipital horn). This measurement is most sensitive to mild dilatation of ventricles as ventricular dilatation is first noted in the occipital horns. The Thalamus and posterior horn were approached via a temporal window. The distance was measured in the sagittal plane in all the infants (19). TVW is defined as the distance between the inner boundaries of the third ventricle when both the boundaries are displayed strictly parallel. It was identified as a hypoechoic space in front of the pineal gland and between basal ganglia structures. The third ventricle was approached via anterior fontanels. The distance was measured in the axial plane in all the infants (19). VHR is defined as the ratio between falx cerebri to the limit of the frontal horn of lateral ventricle and falx cerebri to the inner table of skull measured at the same level. In present study, falx cerebri and lateral limit of the both lateral ventricles were assessed via anterior fontanelle and distance was measured in the coronal plane in all the infants (19). Levene index is the distance between the falx and the lateral wall of the anterior horn of the lateral ventricle in the coronal plane at the level of the third ventricle. The lateral ventricles were assessed through the anterior fontanelle. Measurement of the ventricular system was done in an easy reproducible sonographic plane. A coronal section was chosen in which the lateral ventricles were observed and measured in a location slightly posterior to the foramen of monro (20).

Statistical Analysis

Herein, gestational age was taken as an independent variable; whereas FHW, TOD, TVW, VHR and Levene index were taken as dependent variables. Linear regression model was used for correlation. The Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) for Windows, version 20.0 was used for all statistical analysis (IBM-SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

A total of 189 normal preterm and term neonate’s transcranial ultrasound was performed in present study including 89 (47.1%) male and 100 (52.9%) female neonates across all gestational ages without any gender predominance. Present study included 18 (9.5%) neonates of 33 weeks gestational age, 25 (13.2%) neonates of 34 weeks gestational age, 36 (19.0%) neonates of 35 weeks gestational age, 22 (11.6%) neonates of 36 weeks gestational age, 22 (11.6%) neonates of 37 weeks gestational age, 23 (12.2%) neonates of 38 weeks gestational age, 23 (12.2%) neonates of 39 weeks gestational age, 20 (10.6%) neonates of 40 weeks gestational age. The youngest neonate was of 33 weeks gestational age and the oldest neonate was of 40 weeks with a mean gestational age of (36.4±2.1) weeks. The gestational age of neonates in present study skewed with maximum neonates from 33-36 weeks gestational age.

For a particular gestational age, the average value of right and left FHW, TOD and VHR was calculated, which was taken as Mean, and Standard Deviation (SD) values for that gestational age was also calculated from the pooled data (Table/Fig 1). Then the means were plotted against the gestational age and the linear regression model of the graph was developed. Mean FHW of 1.47±0.33 with 95% confidence interval ranging from 1.32-2.21 mm. TOD showed Mean of 17.12±0.52 with 95% confidence interval ranging from 16.57-17.52 mm; it showed a linear increase in the size of the FHW and negligible change in TOD and VHR with the corresponding increase in gestational age (Table/Fig 2)a,b,d. Same was also done for mean value of other two parameters (TVW and Levene index). Mean TVW of 1.31±0.26 mm showing 95% Confidence interval ranging from 1.15-2.13 mm. There was linear increase in Levene index in correspondence to increase in gestational age (Table/Fig 2)c,e. Reference ranges for normal values of all parameters were calculated as mean plus or minus two standard deviations (Table/Fig 3). The correlation was estimated as Gestational age taken as an independent variable and other variables (FHW, TOD, TVW, VHR, Levene index) taken as dependent variables (Table/Fig 4). All the parameters except TOD and VHR showed p-value <0.05, which was significant.

Discussion

Ventricular dilatation is a major threat to preterm and term neonates. Transcranial ultrasound has become indispensable for detecting ventriculomegaly, thus helping to exclude other associated cerebral pathologies. Wide variations of ventricular indices are reported from previous studies for assessing the normal ventricular size (19),(21). Most of the studies established nomograms 30 years ago, which are still in use and these studies did not look into the racial cranial profile into consideration (22),(23). In present study, authors tried to establish cross-sectional reference ranges for normal values of FHW, TOD, TVW, VHR and Levene Index, among eastern Indian neonates of 33-40 weeks gestation. These nomograms have valid implications in day to day clinical practice.

The mean age of the neonates in present study was 36.4±2.1 gestational weeks. According to Sondhi V et al., among the 1483 neonates studied with various modes of delivery (caesarean or normal vaginal delivery or assisted delivery), newborn ventricle sizes did not alter much. So, the delivery mode was not considered a factor impacting the ventricular size (19). Previous study showed a concordance of ventricular indices with sex distribution (23). To avoid any significant impact of this concordance, authors tried to match the male to female neonates in the study as close as possible to check the confounding effect of the sex in correlation with ventricular indices. In present study, percentage of male neonates was 47% and female was 53%.

Previous study also highlighted variability in sizes of bilateral ventricular dimensions, which is a normal presentation without any pathological significance. According to Sondhi V et al., this difference was insignificant with a median difference of 0.2 mm for FHW (19). Present study, tried to consider this important aspect and the mean of bilateral FHWs were achieved. This explained that if one dimension appeared smaller than the other, when a mean was achieved, it was not that significantly varied with the mean value of the dimension. This also held true for other dimensions like TOD and VHR. Therefore, the data was the mean data of the bilateral dimensions in present study.

In present study, the FHW increased from 1.38 mm at 33 weeks to 1.59 mm at 40 weeks. The linear regression model showed a linear increase in the size with a corresponding increase in gestational age, showing a positive correlation of 0.161 (p-value 0.027) which was significant. In a study by Perry RNW et al., the upper limit of FHW was 3 mm for infants from 26-42 gestational weeks. In their study, FHW showed no change from 26-42 gestational weeks (24). Present study has a minimum measurement of FHW of 1.27 mm to a maximum of 3.34 mm, mean of 1.47±0.33 with 95% confidence interval ranging from 1.32 mm to 2.21 mm, in concordance with Davies MW et al., and Perry RNW et al., showing mean less than 1.7 mm (upper limit of 2.9 mm), and also with Sondhi V et al., and Karamimgham S et al., showing mean less than 1.8 mm (19),(23),(24),(25).

The linear regression model showed almost no change in TOD with a corresponding increase in gestational age and no correlation with the gestational age (r=0.073, p=0.319). TOD remained constant in neonates of 23-33 gestational weeks with a reference range of 8.7-24.7 mm (18). In a study by Sondhi V et al., TOD showed miniscule increase in size with advanced gestational age in neonates from 25-42 gestational weeks’ (means ranging from 6.1-12 mm, 95% CI ranging from 7 mm to 17 mm) with a coefficient of determination (R2) 88%, which was highly significant (19). In a study by Karamimagham S et al., 2017, mean TOD was 15±2.7 mm in neonates from 26-35 gestational weeks (minimum=8.4 mm, maximum=22 mm). TOD in this study did not show any correlation with gestational age (r=-0.07, p=0.35) (25). Present study has a minimum measurement of TOD of 16.09 mm to a maximum of 20.53 mm, mean of 17.12±0.52 with 95% confidence interval ranging from 16.57-17.52 mm. Present study had a mean higher than Karamimagham S et al., (15±2.7 mm) and Sondhi V et al., with a narrow reference range (19),(25). Present study also showed no correlation with gestational age, similar to other study (24). This higher mean could be explained by the high gestational ages of neonates in present study.

The TVW in present study showed a slight increase with increasing age from 1.20 mm at 33 weeks to 1.45 mm at 40 weeks of gestation. The linear regression model showed a linear increase in the size of the third ventricle with a corresponding increase in gestational age, showing a weak positive correlation of 0.278 with the gestational age and at a significance <0.001. In a study by Soni JP et al., TVW slightly increased from 3.69±1.2 mm at 33-37 weeks to 4.13±1.4 mm for greater than 38 weeks (26). In a study by Lombroso CT et al., the TVW ranged from 4-7 mm in newborns and up to one year of age (27). The reference range of TVW was 0-2.6 mm in a study by Davies MW et al., in neonates 23-33 gestational weeks (23). In a study by Sondhi V et al., TVW in neonates from 25-42 gestational weeks (means ranging from 1.25-2.0 mm) showed a coefficient of determination (R2) as 66%, which was highly significant (19). Present study has a minimum measurement of TVW as 1.14 mm to a maximum of 2.92 mm, with a mean of 1.31±0.26 mm showing 95% confidence interval ranging from 1.15-2.13 mm. The mean TVW in present study was smaller than studies by Soni JP et al., and Lombroso CT et al., (26),(27), but was in range compared to studies by Sondhi V et al., and Davies MW et al., present study also showed a weak positive correlation with the gestational age (19),(23). The VHR decreased from 0.120±0.05 at 33 weeks to 0.100±0.04 at 40 weeks of gestation. Johnson ML et al., from their study observed that the mean value of VHR ranged between 0.24-0.34 in preterm and 0.24-0.30 in term neonates (28). Soni JP et al., reported this ratio as 0.32±0.3 in preterm and 0.3±0.3 in term neonates (29).

Levene index measurements showed an increase with maturation, ranging from (Mean±2SD) 10.30±1.80 at 33 weeks to (Mean±2SD) 11.64±3.78 at 40 weeks. The reference intervals presented in present study are nearly similar to the curve published by Levene 30 years ago (20). Liao MF et al., reported slightly higher values for the preterm infants (8). The lower transducer resolution in the 1980s and fewer extremely premature infants may have accounted for the differences between the previous and present reference values.

Limitation(s)

Ultrasound examination is a motion-sensitive technique hence an active or crying neonate may hinder the examination process by making it difficult, resulting in inaccurate measurements. Study was a single centre study, so the results cannot be generalised to the whole population.

Conclusion

Nomograms for different parameters (FHW, TOD, TVW, VHR and Levene index) and corresponding reference ranges are established for assessment of normal preterm and term neonatal ventricular size by using cranial ultrasound in Eastern Indian population. The FHW shows a linear increase in size with a corresponding increase in gestation, having a strong positive correlation with gestational age. The TOD and VHR show a negligible change with increasing gestational age. The TVW shows negligible increase and the Levene index shows linear increase with the gestational age.

Acknowledgement

Authors are grateful to Dr. G. Sahoo, Dean, IMS and SUM Hospital and Dr. M.R. Nayak, the President, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, for facilities. Mr. Somadatta Das is a SOA Full-time Research Scholar (Regd. 1981003004), working in Community Health.

References

1.
Stratchko L, Filatova I, Agarwal A, Kanekar S. The ventricular system of the brain: Anatomy and normal variations. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2016;37:72-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Toi A, Sauerbrei EE. The fetal brain. In: Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Chorboneau JW, editors. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby. 1998;1256-60.
3.
Brant WE. The core curriculum, ultrasound. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. Obstetric ultrasound-second and third trimester. 2001;257-59.
4.
Sethna F, Tennant PW, Rankin J, Robson CS. Prevalence, natural history, and clinical outcome of mild to moderate ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:867-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Volpe JJ. Intracranial hemorrhage: Germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage of the premature infant. Neurology of the newborn. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier. 2008. [crossref]
6.
Soul JS, Eichenwald E, Walter G, Volpe JJ, du Plessis AJ. CSF removal in infantile post hemorrhagic hydrocephalus results insignificant improvement in cerebral hemodynamics. Pediatr Res. 2004;55:872-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Van Alfen-van der Velden AA, Hopman JC, Klaessens JH, Feuth T, Sengers RC, Liem KD. Cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation after serial CSF drainage in infants with PHVD. Brain Dev. 2007;29:623-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Liao MF, Chaou WT, Tsao LY, Nishida H, Sakanoue M. Ultrasound measurement of the ventricular size in newborn infants. Brain Dev. 1986;8:262-68. [crossref]
9.
Müller WD, Urlesberger B. Correlation of ventricular size and head circumference after severe intra-periventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants. Childs Nerv Syst. 1992;8:33-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Barr LL. Neonatal cranial ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999;37:1127-46. [crossref]
11.
Benson JE, Bishop MR, Cohen HL. Intracranial neonatal neurosonography: An update. Ultrasound Q. 2002;18:89-114. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Rumack CM, Drose JA. Neonatal and infant brain imaging, in Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Johnson JA, Charboneau JW (eds): Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO, Elsevier Mosby. 2005;1623-1701.
13.
Sauerbrei EE, Digney M, Harrison PB, Cooperberg PL. Ultrasonic evaluation of neonatal intra-cranial hemorrhage and its complications. Radiology. 1981;139:677-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Monteagudo A, Haratz-Rubinstein N, Timor-Tritsch IE. Biometry of the fetal brain. In: Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cohen HL, editors. Ultrasonography of the prenatal and neonatal brain. Connecticut: Appleton and Lange. 1996;89-146.
15.
Plaisier A, Raets MM, van der Starre C, Feijen-Roon M, Govaert P, Lequin MH, et al. Safety of routine early MRI in preterm infants. Pediatric Radiology. 2012;42:1205-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Lan LM, Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Sugahara T, Takahashi M, Ohba T, et al. Normal fetal brain development: MR imaging with a half-fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence. Radiology. 2000;215:205-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Daneman A, Epelman M. Neurosonography: In pursuit of an optimized examination. PediatrRadiol. 2015;45:S406-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Epelman M, Daneman A, Kellenberger CJ, Aziz A, Konen O, Moineddin R, et al. Neonatal encephalopathy: A prospective comparison of head US and MRI. PediatrRadiol. 2010;40:1640-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Sondhi V, Gupta G, Gupta PK, Patnaik SK, Tshering K. Establishment of nomograms and reference ranges for intra-cranial ventricular dimensions and Ventriculo-hemispheric ratio in newborns by ultrasonography. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97:738-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Levene MI. Measurement of the growth of the lateral ventricles in preterm infants with real time ultrasound. Arch Dis Child. 1981;56:900-04. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Evans WA. An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular enlargement and cerebral atrophy. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1942;47:931-37. [crossref]
22.
Brouwer MJ, de Vries LS, Groenendaal F, Koopman C, Pistorius LR, Mulder EJ, et al. New reference values for the neonatal cerebral ventricles. Radiology. 2012;262:224-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Davies MW, Swaminathan M, Chuang SL, Betheras FR. Reference ranges for the linear dimensions of the intracranial ventricles in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Edu. 2000;82:F218-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Perry RNW, Bowman ED, Roy RND, de Crespigny LC. Ventricular size in newborn infants. J Ultrasound Med. 1985;4:475-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Karamimagham S, Poursadeghfard M, Hemmati F. Normal reference range of lateral ventricle parameters in preterm neonates by ultrasonography. Shiraz E-Med J. 2017;18:e57569. [crossref]
26.
Soni JP, Gupta BD, Soni M, Singh RN, Purohit NN, Gupta M, et al. Normal parameters of ventricular system in healthy infants. Indian Pediatr. 1995;32:549-55.
27.
Lombroso CT, ERba G, Yogo T, Logowitz N. Two dimensional ultrasonography: A method to study normal and abnormal ventricle. Pediatrics.1968;42:157-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Johnson ML, Mack LA, Rumack CM, Forst M, Kdshbaum C. B-Mode echoencephalography in the normal and high-risk infants. Am J Radiol. 1979;133:375-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Soni JP, Singhania RU, Sharma A. Measurement of ventricular size in term and perterm infants. Indian Pediatr. 1992;29:55-59. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53140.15856

Date of Submission: Nov 03, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Dec 04, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 27, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 08, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 30, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 27, 2021 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com