Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 154648

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : TC19 - TC23 Full Version

Evaluation of Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Newborns with Suspected Hypoxic Ischaemic Injury and its Association with Clinical Staging: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51589.15890
Parinita Sadhanidar, Nabanita Deka, Sushant Agarwal

1. Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Nabanita Deka,
Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital,
Bhangagarh, Guwahati-781032, Assam, India.
E-mail: drnabanita78@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Hypoxic Ischaemic Injury (HII) also known as Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the most common causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality in most countries of the world. Perinatal asphyxia being the most frequent cause of HII, some of its long-term sequelae includes impaired neurological development, cerebral palsy, recurrent seizures, etc. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been found to be most sensitive in detecting lesions in the brain of neonates with HII.

Aim: To evaluate the role of MRI in assessing neurologic damage in newborns with suspected HII and its association with clinical staging.

Materials and Methods: An institution-based descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care Government Hospital in Guwahati, Assam, India for a duration of 15 months from May 2017 to July 2018 on 50 neonates with history of perinatal asphyxia. Assessment of conventional T1 and T2 weighted images, Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI) was done and association of MRI findings with gestational maturity, Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) scores and clinical staging (Sarnat and Sarnat Staging system) was studied.

Results: In majority of cases with clinically mild HII, MRI findings were either normal or of mild degree whereas in cases of clinically advanced stages of HII, MRI findings were moderate-to-severe, suggesting a positive association between clinical grading and severity of brain injury. Term neonates sustained injuries mostly in cortical-subcortical/watershed zones of brain whereas preterm neonates were seen to sustain mainly periventricular lesions. Basal ganglia, thalamic and midbrain lesions were seen to be associated with severe degree of HII in term neonates whereas germinal matrix haemorrhage was observed in preterm neonates with severe HII. A positive association was seen between severity of brain lesions with both low APGAR scores and gestational prematurity.

Conclusion: MRI is helpful to study the pattern of brain involvement in term and preterm neonates with suspected HII and to assess the severity of injury. MRI findings are seen to correlate well with clinical staging.

Keywords

APGAR score, Diffusion weighted imaging, Germinal matrix haemorrhage, Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, Perinatal asphyxia, Sarnat’s staging

Hypoxic Ischaemic Injury (HII) or Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the most common causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality in most of the countries. The most common cause of HII is perinatal asphyxia (1). Problems during delivery, like a compressed umbilical cord or placental dysfunction, can result in an acute reduction of circulation and gas exchange. Also, after birth, problems with the oxygen supply can occur, if the newborn cannot initiate or sustain effective breathing (2),(3). Perinatal asphyxia is characterised by oxygen and nutrients deficiency in all organs of the newborn, hence called hypoxic ischaemia. Especially to the brain, this injury is reported to have serious consequences for future development (2). The hypoxic-ischaemic insult can affect large parts of the brain, both in gray and white matter (2),(4). This may have consequences for brain development, both structural and functional, and in the long-term might result in mental retardation, motor deficits and disorders of sensory functions (2),(5).

Although, Ultrasonography (USG), Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are all used, MRI is the most sensitive and specific modality for detection of HII. It is safe as it involves no radiation and can be performed during neonate’s sleep (6). Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) changes are detected earlier than on conventional T1- and T2-weighted MRI (7).

As neonatal encephalopathy continues to be a cause of high mortality and morbidity worldwide, detection of such injury at an early stage is essential for development of strategies to limit permanent brain damage and for prognostication of neurological development of the newborn (8),(9). Despite a high incidence rate of HII in a developing nation like India, there is scarcity of literature on imaging-based studies on HII conducted. Hence, the present study was an attempt to address such lacunae in literature for better understanding of the imaging-based prognostication of affected neonates as opposed to clinical staging and to determine any association between the two. MRI defines the nature and the extent of injury and also has diagnostic value in excluding unaffected babies from those clinically considered as mildly or moderately asphyxiated.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of MRI in assessing neurological damage in newborns with suspected HII and its association with clinical staging.

Material and Methods

The present study was an institution-based descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care Government Hospital in Guwahati, Assam, India for a period of 15 months from May 2017 to July 2018 after obtaining clearance from Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) vide No. MC/190/2007/Pt-1/EC/99 dated 30/05/2017. A total of 50 neonates were enrolled in the study who subsequently underwent MRI of brain. This sample size was achieved by including all the eligible neonates based on inclusion and exclusion criteria admitted to the Paediatrics Department within the time frame of study.

Inclusion criteria: All haemodynamically stable newborns irrespective of the gestational age sustaining perinatal asphyxia with clinical diagnosis of HII were included.

Exclusion criteria: Haemodynamically unstable babies who may not tolerate prolonged examination times. Babies with lethal/major congenital malformation, infection and suspected metabolic disease.

MRI was done on Siemens Somatom Tim Avanto 1.5 Tesla MRI System. Sedation was achieved using pedicloryl syrup. (Inj. Propofol 2-3 mg/kg body weight, slow i.v. was used for restless babies). Following plain MRI pulse sequences were obtained with section thickness 3-4 millimeter:

• T1-weighted spin-echo (TR/ TE, 400/13-308),
• T2-FLAIR (TR/TE, 9500/120),
• Axial T2 FSE TR/TE (4000/102),
• DWI (TR/TE 8000/100.7)
• SWI (Susceptibility Weighted Imaging)

A standardised grading system was devised for both MRI findings in term and preterm neonates as well as clinical symptoms.

Procedure

In all cases, after obtaining informed consent, a brief history of mother was taken which included clinical and antenatal details, followed by clinical examination of the neonate, symptoms suspicious for perinatal asphyxia including APGAR score, feeding status, reflexes, presence of seizures, etc. Parameters such as gestational age, birth weight were recorded. The babies were then evaluated with MRI examination of the brain.

Symptoms suspicious for perinatal asphyxia included one or more of the following criteria such as meconeum stained liquor, derangements in prenatal Non Stress Test (NST) or cardiotopography, low APGAR score (10) at birth, poor feeding, abnormal tone/reflexes etc. A score of 7 or <7 at 5 minutes of birth was considered as low APGAR score.

Clinical grading of HII (According to Sarnat and Sarnat Staging System (11)):

• Mild: Irritable/Poor feeding/Exaggerated tendon reflexes/Normal to increased muscle tone/No seizures.
• Moderate: Lethargic/Exaggerated tendon reflexes/Decreased muscle tone/Early onset seizure.
• Severe: Coma/Seizures/Flaccidity/Brainstem and autonomic dysfunction.

MRI criteria: Lesions or altered signal intensities due to ischaemic injury in the regions of interest for HII, viz.,– Subcortical white matter and/or cortex, Posterior Limb of Internal Capsule (PLIC), Perirolandic White Matter (PRWM), Periventricular White Matter (PVWM), basal ganglia, thalami, brainstem and germinal matrix.

Morphology/pattern of brain lesions was classified as described by Chao CP et al., (12).

Sites of altered signal intensities in term babies:

Subcortical white matter/cortex- signifies mild injury

• PRWM and PLIC- moderate injury
• Brainstem, Basal ganglia and thalami- severe injury.
• Sites of altered signal intensities in preterm babies:
• PVWM- signifies mild injury
• PVWM with or without PLIC/PRWM- moderate injury
• Germinal matrix bleed/basal ganglia and thalamic lesions- severe injury.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis of the study was done as per standardised statistical methods using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Various clinical and demographic features (variables) were compared with abnormal MRI findings (outcome) using inferential statistics, i.e., Pearson’s Chi-square test to find out the association between these. Quantitative variables were handled as frequencies and represented in a tabular and histogram format, whereas categorical variables were represented with the help of bar diagrams. The p-value of <0.05 indicates statistically significant difference.

Results

Frequency distribution of MRI findings according to different variables such as gestational age, APGAR score and clinical staging were studied and observations are shown in (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2), (Table/Fig 3). Severity of brain injury was found to be more in preterm babies (50% showed severe involvement), whereas majority of term babies (50%) showed only mild involvement (Table/Fig 1). Babies with low APGAR score at 5 minutes of birth were found to be more commonly affected and more likely to show severe MRI abnormalities (Table/Fig 2).

Out of 13 cases clinically classified as stage 1 HII, 7 cases had a normal MRI study. Also, within this group less than half of the cases (46%) showed mild brain injury (Table/Fig 4). In patients clinically having moderate HII (stage 2), a normal MRI study was found in 6 cases (21.4%) and mild involvement was seen in 14 cases (50%). In babies classified as clinically severe (stage 3), 4 cases (44.4%) showed severe involvement in MRI study and none of these cases showed a normal MRI findings (Table/Fig 4).

PVWM was observed to be the most commonly affected area (54% cases), followed by cortex/subcortical white matter (36% cases) (Table/Fig 5).

Periventricular White Matter (PVWM): PVWM abnormality was seen in 27 cases (54%), in the form of T2 and FLAIR hyperintensity with evidence of restricted diffusion on DWI in 8 cases (Table/Fig 6), (Table/Fig 7). Of these, 21 (50%) were term neonates while 6 (75%) were preterm.

Cortex/Subcortical white matter: Cortex and/or subcortical white matter abnormality was observed in 18 cases (36%). All of these cases were found to be term babies (42 cases). In majority of cases, changes were observed in the form of T2 and FLAIR hyperintensities in the cortex, especially watershed portions between Anterior Cerebral Artery (ACA)- Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) and Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA)- Posterior Cerebral Artery (PCA) territories, and the underlying subcortical white matter. Diffusion restriction was seen in three cases (Table/Fig 8). Two of the cases had changes of multicystic encephalomalacia (Table/Fig 9).

Posterior Limb of Internal Capsule (PLIC): PLIC involvement was found in seven cases (14%) in the form of absence of the (or incomplete) normal T1 hyperintensity and T2/FLAIR hypointensity in the PLIC (Table/Fig 10). Restricted diffusion on DWI was seen in two cases. Six cases (14.2%) were term neonates while one case (12.5%) was preterm.

Perirolandic White Matter (PRWM): Signal changes in the form of T1, T2 and FLAIR hyperintensity involving the PRWM was seen in six cases (12%) (Table/Fig 11). Of these, five cases (11.9%) were term babies while one case (12.5%) was preterm. Diffusion restriction was present in two cases.

Basal ganglia and thalamus: Abnormality in the basal ganglia and thalami was observed in four cases (8%) each. Of these, three were term babies and one was preterm, in each category. The signal changes were in the form of T1, T2 and FLAIR hyperintensities (Table/Fig 12). Three of the cases showed restricted diffusion.

Brainstem: Brainstem signal changes were seen in one case (2%), who was a term neonate. T1, T2 and FLAIR hyperintensities were seen along with mild diffusion restriction on DWI.

Germinal matrix: Germinal matrix haemorrhage was seen in four cases (8%), all of whom were preterm babies. Signal changes were observed in the form of T1 hyperintensity in the ventricles along with presence of susceptibility foci on SWI in the corresponding regions in two cases (Table/Fig 13). In the other two cases, only susceptibility foci were seen in the ventricles without the presence of corresponding T1 hyperintensity.

Discussion

Gestational age: In the present study, more severe brain involvement was seen in preterm babies compared to term babies, with a statistically significant association between these variables. Therefore according to this study, there was significant association between maturity of foetus and brain injury in birth asphyxia and the chance of finding a severe MRI abnormality was high. This finding corroborates with that of the study conducted by Moore T et al., according to which infants born prematurely have a high incidence of neonatal brain injury, with detrimental effects on motor, cognitive, behavioural, social, attentional, and sensory outcomes (13). Hintz SR et al., in their study also find that preterm neonates are more prone to sustaining HII as compared to term babies (14). Also, Cooper DJ, and Bryce J et al., in their studies concluded that premature neonates are particularly at risk of suffering HII, with the incidence being a significant 60% higher (15),(16).

APGAR score: In present study, significant association was found between low APGAR score and brain injury. It was seen that babies with low APGAR at 5 minutes of birth, majority (88.8%) were affected and almost half (43.7%) of them showed severe involvement in MRI. Of the babies having normal APGAR and showing MRI changes, majority (85.7%) were mild and none of them showed severe involvement. These findings corroborated with study conducted by Mercuri E et al., which observed that cerebral infarction and scattered white matter changes were most common findings in infants with low APGAR (4 and above) score whereas severe and moderate basal ganglia and thalamic lesions were observed in babies with very low APGAR (3 or below) (17). Similarly Ayrapetyan M et al., in their study found that in infants with low APGAR scores approximately 35% showed severe and 41% showed mild-to-moderate MRI abnormalities (18).

Clinical severity (Sarnat’s classification): In this study, it was found that there is >50% chance of getting a normal MRI even in neonates who are clinically graded as mildly affected (stage 1). Whereas in clinically severe (stage 3) babies, almost half (44.4%) of them showed severe MRI abnormalities. These findings corroborated with those of the study conducted by Kaufman SA et al., in which more than half of the cases with clinically mild hypotension showed a normal MRI study (19). Of those babies clinically having moderate hypotension, 20% were normal at MRI, 52% showed only mild changes and 12% showed severe involvement. More than half of the babies having clinically severe hypotension showed involvement of thalamus, basal ganglia and brainstem. It was concluded that mild encephalopathy correlates with normal MRI result, and severe encephalopathy correlates with abnormalities in the basal ganglia/thalami (19).

In present study, majority of newborns who had HII were found to have mild involvement on brain MRI (44%). This was similar to a study done by Lally PJ et al., in South India where the proportion of newborns with mild HII was 56% and also to another study conducted in Rotunda hospital in Ireland by Hayes BC et al., where of the 237 newborns assessed, 65.4% had the mild form of HII (20),(21).

Location of abnormality in brain: Present study found that in term babies with mild HII, 16 cases (76.1%) showed signal changes in cortex/subcortical white matter. This observation was similar to study by Van Den BR, and Takashima S and Tanaka K who concluded that term infants suffering from mild ischaemic insult mostly sustain injury in the watershed regions of cerebral cortex and underlying subcortical white matter and PVWM (22),(23). This pattern of injury will lead to gliosis in the cortical subcortical region and atrophy of parasagittal watershed areas in term neonates.

In a significant proportion (77%) of term babies manifesting clinically mild HII, signal changes were found in PVWM. According to Rutherford M et al., such periventricular signal changes are sometimes difficult to differentiate from delayed myelination, due to immature white matter in infants under one year of age (24). These changes may however become more obvious with time in some infants and hence, such infants are to be followed-up with repeat imaging.

Among those neonates having clinically severe asphyxia, 57% showed involvement of thalamus and basal ganglia each and 14.28% showed involvement of brainstem. According to a study by Sie LT et al., in babies having severe asphyxia, 50% showed thalamic involvement, 25% basal ganglia involvement and 25% brainstem involvement (25). Bharat MP et al., in their study found that in babies with clinical stage 3 HII, 55% had bilateral basal ganglia involvement and 30% had bilateral thalamic involvement (26). Voit T et al., has observed that thalamic-striatal damage is the hallmark of more widespread brain damage, more frequently observed in asphyxiated term babies (27). Barkovich AJ and Truwit CL also observed that primary brainstem, thalamus and basal ganglia involvement is seen in those with cardio-circulatory arrest, indicating severe birth asphyxia (28). Chang PD et al., in their study concluded that lesions in the basal ganglia-thalamus, posterior or anterior limb of internal capsule or watershed infarction corresponded with subsequent abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome at 18-24 months of age and accounted for about 45% of the total abnormal cases (29).

Among those suffering from clinically moderate asphyxia in present study, signal changes were frequently observed in perirolandic white matter and PLIC (75% and 87%, respectively), majority of whom were term babies. Rutherford MA et al., had observed that MRI lesions in internal capsule predict poor neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with HII (30).

Present study found that in preterm babies with mild-to-moderate hypotension, all three cases (1 mild and 2 moderate) showed PVWM involvement and it was also the most common area to be affected. Germinal matrix haemorrhage was seen in four preterm babies (50%) out of which three had severe hypotension and one had moderate hypotension. Therefore, germinal matrix was found to be most commonly affected in severe hypotension. These findings were corroborated in the study by Sie LT et al., where periventricular leukomalacia was seen in majority of neonates (82%) after subacute or chronic hypoxia in preterm babies, and also in the study by Bharat MP et al., where 23.3% of preterm babies with HII showed periventricular leucomalacia and all cases showing haemorrhage were seen in preterm babies only (25),(26).

Limitation(s)

The sample size was small. Also, no follow-up imaging in neurodevelopmental assessment of study population at a later age could be done for comparison of clinical outcomes with initial MRI studies. Another limitation is possible under detection of brain lesions in preterm babies due to immature myelination in brain. Follow-up of long-term data of affected infants to assess unreported milder disabilities such as attention deficit disorders needs to be taken up. Further work needs to be done on a larger study population and with newer advances like Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) perfusion MRI and MRI spectroscopy to firmly establish guidelines on use of neuroimaging in babies with birth asphyxia.

Conclusion

MRI is an excellent non invasive imaging technique for the assessment of severity of brain injury in children affected with HII. The use of MRI has resulted in identification of a higher rate of abnormalities compared to other modalities. PVWM is found to be the most frequently affected area for ischaemic lesions in both term and preterm babies. Severely asphyxiated cases shows involvement of thalamus-basal ganglia in term and germinal matrix haemorrhage in preterm babies. Neonates who are prematurely born and those with a low APGAR score are prone to show more severe injury. Early diagnosis of HII would help to identify neonates who require early rehabilitation for the improvement of long-term outcome and reduction of disability.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the technical staff at the Department of Radiodiagnosis of GMCH for their help in carrying out this study.

References

1.
Kudrevičienė A, Basevičius A, LukoÅ¡evičius S, Laurynaitienė J, Marmiene? V, Nedzelskienė I, et al. The value of ultrasonography and doppler sonography in prognosticating long-term outcomes among full-term newborns with perinatal asphyxia. Medicina. 2014;50(2):100-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Volpe JJ. Neurology of the newborn, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders company, 1995, p211-467.
3.
Berger R, Garnier Y. Perinatal brain injury. J Perinat Med. 2000;28:261-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Volpe JJ. Neurobiology of periventricular leukomalacia in the premature infant. Pediatric Research. 2001;50(5):553. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Dilenge ME, Majnemer A, Shevell MI. Topical review: Long-term developmental outcome of asphyxiated term neonates. Journal of Child Neurology. 2001;16(11):781-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Martha DE, Weiss MD. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: A review for the clinician. JAMA Pediatrics. 2015;169(4):397-403. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Martinez-Biarge M, Diez-Sebastian J, Kapellou O, Gindner D, Allsop JM, Rutherford MA, et al. Predicting motor outcome and death in term hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Neurology. 2011;76(24):2055-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Aida N, Nishimura G, Hachiya Y, Matsui K, Takeuchi M, Itani Y. MR imaging of perinatal brain damage: Comparison of clinical outcome with initial and follow-up MR findings. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1998;19(10):1909-21.
9.
Barnett A, Mercuri E, Rutherford M, Haataja L, Frisone MF, Henderson S, et al. Neurological and perceptual-motor outcome at 5-6 years of age in children with neonatal encephalopathy: Relationship with neonatal brain MRI. Neuropediatrics. 2002;33(05):242-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetric Practice. The apgar score. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4):1444-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: A clinical and electroencephalographic study. Archives of Neurology. 1976;33(10):696-705. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Chao CP, Zaleski CG, Patton AC. Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: Multimodality imaging findings. Radiographics. 2006;26(suppl_1):S159-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Moore T, Hennessy EM, Myles J, Johnson SJ, Draper ES, Costeloe KL, et al. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: The EPICure studies. BMJ. 2012;345:e7961. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7961. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Vohr BR, Poole WK, Higgins RD, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Changes in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age among infants of less than 25 weeks' gestational age born in 1993-1999. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):1645-51. 10.1542/peds.2004-2215. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Cooper DJ. Induced hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: Pathophysiology, current treatment, and nursing considerations. Neonatal Netw. 2011;30:29-35. Doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.30.1.29. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, Black RE. WHO Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet. 2005;365:1147-52. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71877-8. [crossref]
17.
Mercuri E, Rutherford M, Barnett A, Foglia C, Haataja L, Counsell S, et al. MRI lesions and infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Is the Apgar score predictive? Neuropediatrics. 2002;33(3):150-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Ayrapetyan M, Talekar K, Schwabenbauer K, Carola D, Solarin K, McElwee D, et al. Apgar scores at 10 minutes and outcomes in term and late preterm neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the cooling era. American Journal of Perinatology. 2019;36(05):545-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Kaufman SA, Miller SP, Ferriero DM, Glidden DH, Barkovich AJ, Partridge JC. Encephalopathy as a predictor of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in asphyxiated newborns. Pediatric Neurology. 2003;28(5):342-46. [crossref]
20.
Lally PJ, Price DL, Pauliah SS, Bainbridge A, Kurien J. Neonatal encephalopathic cerebral injury in South India assessed by perinatal magnetic resonance biomarker and early childhood neurodevelopmental outcome. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87874. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Hayes BC, Palsdottir N, Futrakul U. Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in newborn infants at >36 weeks' gestation. BMC Pediatr. 2013;14:207. [crossref]
22.
Van den BR. Centrifugal elements in the vascular pattern of the deep intracerebral blood supply. Angiologica. 1969;20(2):88-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Takashima S, Tanaka K. Development of the cerebrovascular architecture and its relationship to periventricular leukomalacia. Arch Neurol. 1978;35(1):11-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Rutherford M, Pennock J, Schwieso J, Cowan F, Dubowitz L. Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: Early and late magnetic resonance imaging findings in relation to outcome. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 1996;75(3):F145-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Sie LT, Van der Knaap MS, Oosting J, De Vries LS, Lafeber HN, Valk J. MR patterns of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage after prenatal, perinatal or postnatal asphyxia. Neuropediatrics. 2000;31(03):128-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Bharat MP, Deepak KS, LD NK. To evaluate the role of MRI of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. International Journal of Health and Clinical Research. 2020;3(12):66-70.
27.
Voit T, Lemburg P, Neuen E, Lumenta C, Stork W. Damage of thalamus and basal ganglia in asphyxiated full-term neonates. Neuropediatrics. 1987;18(3):176-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Barkovich AJ, Truwit CL. Brain damage from perinatal asphyxia: Correlation of MR findings with gestational age. AJNR. 1990;11(6):1087-96.
28.
Chang PD, Chow DS, Alber A, Lin YK, Youn YA. Predictive values of location and volumetric MRI injury patterns for neurodevelopmental outcomes in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy neonates. Brain Sciences. 2020;10(12):991. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Rutherford MA, Pennock JM, Counsell SJ, Mercuri E, Cowan FM, Dubowitz LM, et al. Abnormal magnetic resonance signal in the internal capsule predicts poor neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 1998;102(2):323-28. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51589.15890

Date of Submission: Aug 15, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 10, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 04, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 16, 2021
• Manual Googling: Oct 07, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Nov 25, 2021 (22%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com