Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 57198

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : TR01 - TR04 Full Version

Sacral Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas, a Rare and Underdiagnosed Subtype of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Case Series with Review of Literature


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51659.15905
Sarvesh Chandra Mishra, Vivek Singh, Srishti Sharma, Pragya Chaturvedi, Vikrant Mahajan

1. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Additional Professor, Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vivek Singh,
Additional Professor, Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of
Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: singhvivek79@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas (SDAVFs) are the most common type of spinal vascular malformations with arterial feeders usually from the intercostals, vertebral, subclavian and lumbar arteries and rarely from the internal iliac arteries. Authors report three cases of SDAVFs at our institution where arterial feeders were from internal iliac artery. The endovascular embolisation of arterial feeders was done using n-BCA (n-butyl cyanoacrylate) embolic agent in one case and with Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol (Onyx) in two cases with complete obliteration of the fistula. This resulted in marked clinical improvement in all the patients. The lateral sacral arteries are not a common site of origin of arterial feeders to the SDAVFs and can be easily overlooked if thorough spinal Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is not performed. Through these three cases, authors want to highlight the importance of performing complete spinal DSA.

Keywords

Endovascular embolisation, Internal iliac artery, Spinal vascular malformation

The SDAVFs are the commonest spinal vascular malformations; however they are still rare and are often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed. SDAVFs are usually located dorsally in the low dorsal and lumbar regions with 80% occurring between T6 and L2 (1). The incidence is highest in the 5th and 6th decades of life with males getting affected more often. The symptoms are insidious in onset and gradually progressive with significant delay between presentation and diagnosis. The aetiology of SDAVF is unclear. However, it is considered to be an acquired disease in view of majority of patients becoming symptomatic in the middle age. Most of the cases are spontaneous and history of trauma present only in 4% of the patients (2). They are never located within the spinal parenchyma unlike spinal arteriovenous malformations and hence rarely cause intra-medullary haemorrhage. They are abnormal, direct communication between a radicular/radiculomeningeal artery and a radicular/pial vein in the dura of an adjacent nerve root sleeve. The arterial feeders are usually from the intercostals, vertebral, subclavian and lumbar arteries. However, more rarely the internal iliac arteries can give feeders to the SDAVFs which can be easily missed on DSA if the internal iliac artery angiograms are not taken. Nishio A et al., recommended that in case of suspected SDAVF if the lesion is not identified in the dorsal and lumbar spine, an angiographic examination of the internal iliac arteries should be performed (3). Authors present three cases of SDAVFs with arterial feeders from internal iliac arteries with patient presenting with progressive lower limb weakness and difficulty in walking with associated bladder disturbances.

Case Report

Case 1

A 65-year-old, male, presented with complaints of difficulty in walking since two years which was insidious in onset and gradually progressive. There was associated low backache since two years and jerky movements in bilateral lower limbs since eight months. There was urinary incontinence since four months.

Patient was conscious, cooperative and well oriented to time, place and person with intact higher mental functions and cranial nerves examination. The motor examination was abnormal for bilateral lower limbs which showed spasticity and reduced power of 3 out of 5. Deep tendon reflexes were 3+ for knee and ankle. Plantar reflexes were extensor bilaterally. On sensory examination there was decreased touch and pain below L1 level.

On Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) long segment intramedullary T2 hyperintensity within the dorsal spinal cord extending from D5-6 intervertebral disc level to lower end of D12 vertebra, multiple flow voids on the surface of the spinal cord with associated cord expansion and oedema (Table/Fig 1).

The DSA showed a type I SDAVF with feeding artery arising from anterior division of left internal iliac artery (Table/Fig 2).

The angiogram was taken after selective catheterisation of the left internal iliac artery which delineated the arterial feeders from the left sacral artery and venous drainage into the perimedullary veins. Subselective catheterisation of the left lateral sacral artery was done using Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) compatible marathon microcatheter (Marathon?SUP?TM#SUP#). Selective angiogram was taken to delineate the location and anatomy of the fistula explicitly. Further onyx 18 containing 6% ethylene vinyl alcohol was used as liquid embolic agent and was administered under fluoroscopic visualisation via the marathon microcatheter after coating its lumen with DMSO. Postembolisation check angiogram showed no connection between arterial and venous components of fistula. On three months follow-up postembolisation, the patient showed remarkable improvement in difficulty in walking and lower backache. However, urinary incontinence persisted.

Case 2

A 63-year-old male patient presented with complaints of gait imbalance of eight months duration and gradually progressive bilateral lower limb weakness of six months duration. There was history of sensory loss over abdomen and urinary incontinence since two months. Patient was conscious, cooperative and well oriented to time, place and person with intact higher mental functions and cranial nerves. The motor examination of lower limbs showed increased tone with decreased power of 2 out of 5 and deep tendon reflexes of 4+ at knee and ankle. The plantar reflexes were extensor bilaterally. Sensory examination revealed pain and sensory loss below the D9 level.

On MRI, a long segment intramedullary cord hyperintensity was seen extending from D6 level till the conus medullaris with multiple prominent flow voids along the dorsal and ventral aspect of the dorsal cord, more marked in the lower dorsal cord region (Table/Fig 3). DSA showed type I SDAVF in lower lumbar spinal canal with feeding artery from lateral sacral branch of left internal iliac artery. The venous drainage was into perimedullary vein. The artery of Adamkiewicz was seen arising from radiculo-medullary branch of left D10 posterior intercostal artery (Table/Fig 4).

Selective catheterisation of left internal iliac artery was done delineating arterial feeders from left sacral artery and venous drainage into the perimedullary veins. Subselective catheterisation of the left lateral sacral artery was done using Magic 1.2 Fr flow dependent microcatheter (Balt USA) having a length of 165 cm. Further, the embolisation of the fistula was done using mixture of glue (N-butyl cyanoacrylate) and lipiodol in a ratio of 1:2 under fluoroscopic visualisation.

Postembolisation selective angiogram of left sacral artery showed no residual connection between arterial and venous components of fistula. On three months follow-up postembolisation, the patient showed remarkable improvement in the lower limb weakness and difficulty in walking. However, pain sensation and bladder dysfunction persisted.

Case 3

A 51-year-old male patient presented with band like compressive sensation in lumbar region with radiation of pain into bilateral lower limbs since two years. There was history of gradually progressive bilateral lower limb weakness since last 18 months with associated diminished sensation below L3 level. There was associated history of constipation and urinary incontinence for one year.

Patient was conscious, cooperative and well oriented to time, place and person with intact higher mental functions and cranial nerves. The motor examination of lower limbs showed increased tone with decreased power of 2 out of 5 and deep tendon reflexes of 4+ at knee and ankle. The plantar reflexes were extensor bilaterally. Sensory examination revealed pain and sensory loss below the D8 level.

The MRI dorsolumbar spine showed long segment intra-substance hyperintensity in the dorsolumbar region cord parenchyma with multiple flow voids on cord surface. Spinal DSA showed a SDAVF with feeders from lateral sacral arteries (Table/Fig 5)a. Under strict aseptic precaution and under general anaesthesia, right common femoral artery access was secured using 6Fr arterial sheath. A 5Fr Renal Double Curved (RDC) catheter was used to selectively cannulate the left internal iliac artery. An angiogram was taken which showed arterial feeders from right as well as the left lateral sacral artery. The left lateral sacral artery was selectively cannulated using marathon microcatheter and traxcess guide wire and 0.5 mL of glue and lipiodol mixture in a ratio of 1:2.5 was injected. The postembolisation angiogram showed complete obliteration of the fistula (Table/Fig 5)b.

On three months follow-up postembolisation, the patient showed significant improvement in the lower limb weakness and pain symptoms. However, the bladder dysfunction did not show much improvement. The patient was lost to follow-up due to prevailing COVID conditions.

Discussion

The spinal vascular malformations are divided into four subtypes which include type I (SDAVF), type II (glomus arteriovenous malformation), type III (juvenile arteriovenous malformations) and type IV (intradural arteriovenous fistula) (4). The SDAVF are the most commonly encountered vascular malformation of the spinal cord accounting for ~70% of all such lesions and are one of the treatable causes of progressive myelopathy (1),(2). It was first described by Foix and Alajouanine in 1926 (5). They are rare and underdiagnosed with reported annual incidence of 5-10 cases per million (2). As per the available literature the average delay is 15-24 months between symptom onset and diagnosis confirmation (6),(7). The elderly males in the 5th and 6th decades of life are usually affected (8). The most common location in spine is the dorsolumbar region with more than three quarter of cases located from mid-thoracic to the upper lumbar spine levels (1).

These fistulae are acquired, low-flow abnormal direct connections between a radicular/radiculomeningeal artery and a radicular/pial vein in the dura covering spinal nerve roots (2). Approximately, 85% of SDAVFs consist of a single transdural arterial feeder; however, there are cases with many arterial feeders originating from either a single or multiple levels that may be either unilateral or bilateral (8).

The SDAVFs are mostly supplied by intercostals and lumbar arteries. However, arterial feeders have been reported from vertebral arteries, costocervical trunk, thyrocervical trunk, presacral and external carotid arteries. Rarely, fistulas located in the sacral region, are supplied by lateral sacral and iliolumbar arteries as in index cases (9). The reported incidence of SDAVFs in the sacral region was 12.5% in a series by Nishio A et al., (3). Larsen DW et al., (9) recommended that an angiographic examination of the internal iliac arteries be performed in patients with suspected SDAVF when the lesion has not been detected in the dorsal or lumbar region as in index cases where the intercostals and the lumbar artery angiograms did not show any fistula.

The presence of a fistula leads to arterialisation of the spinal veins resulting in spinal venous hypertension, cord congestion, cord oedema with untreated cases progressing to cord ischaemic and infarction (5). The patients usually present with progressive lower limb weakness, pain or sensory changes. The sphincteric involvement can also be seen. The symptoms are generally insidious in onset and progress over many months to years.

Usually, the initial radiographic diagnosis is made on MRI. It helps in excluding the common causes of paraplegia and reveals characteristic appearance suggestive of SDAVF which include abnormal long segment T2 hyperintensity within the cord, cord expansion and flow voids on the dorsal and/or ventral aspect of cord. Spinal cord atrophy and some T1 postcontrast enhancement can be seen in chronic SDAVFs (5). In acute presentation, the cord enhancement is due to capillary leak phenomenon secondary to venous hypertension. Diffuse multilevel intramedullary hyperintensity is the most sensitive finding (10). Prominent serpiginous intradural extramedullary flow voids are the most specific finding. They usually span more than three segments. T2 peripheral cord hypointensity can be seen (11). It is thought to represent pial capillaries containing deoxyglobin secondary to venous hypertension.

The segmental level of cord enlargement and signal change does not correlate with the location of the fistula (12). Alternatively if MRI is contraindicated, Computed Tomography (CT) angiography with 75% successful localisation of fistula can be used (12). CT myelography can also be used showing fistula as filling defects due to dilated veins (12). DSA confirms the diagnosis in cases of clinical or radiological suspicion. However, it is an invasive procedure with potential risk of cord ischaemic secondary to dissection.

The treatment in SDAVF is aimed at occluding the shunting zone (i.e., the most distal part of the artery together with the most proximal part of the draining vein) (13), either by superselective embolisation with a liquid embolic agent or by a neurosurgical approach.

Surgery consists of targeted laminectomy and intradural exploration with coagulation or disconnection of the draining vein; occlusion rates as high as 98% have been reported (12). However, high occlusion rates to the tune of 85% have been reported with endovascular embolisation (12). The endovascular treatment showed results comparable to surgery when the fistula point was correctly disconnected as per single centre experience documented by Gioppo A et al., (14). It is performed either with glue or onyx as in index cases after superselective catheterisation of the radiculomeningeal artery supplying the fistula which in two of the cases was left lateral sacral artery and bilateral sacral arteries in the third case. It is contraindicated if the radiculomeningeal artery also supplies the Anterior Spinal Artery (ASA) which was not the scenario in any of index cases. The risks and benefits of the endovascular embolisation were explained to the patients and their families. The risks are usually due to inadvertent embolisation leading to ischaemic sequelae and permanent neurological deficits (15).

Following obliteration of the fistula, the disease progression can be stopped and symptomatic improvement is usually seen. If treated early, motor and sensory functions recover better than pain and bladder dysfunction which are only reversed in a minority of patients as in index case which did not show improvement of bladder dysfunction.

A differential diagnosis of filum terminale Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) and very rarely a cauda equina AVF should also be kept in mind as rarely they can also have a similar clinical and imaging picture. Filum terminale AVF usually has a single feeding artery with ASA continuing as the feeding artery (16) with normal calibre and course at the level of conus medullaris. The venous drainage is via filum terminale vein which runs parallel to the feeding artery giving a characteristic feeder drainer pattern.

The cauda equina AVF feeder could be radicular, spinal or both (17). The ASA shows changes in calibre reflecting the transition of the ASA into a radicular artery in cauda equina AVF. Unlike the parallel feeder drainer patter seen in the filum terminale AVF, the cauda shows wavy drainer pattern (18).

Conclusion

The SDAVFs are uncommon lesions and more so in sacral location and can be easily overlooked if high degree of clinical suspicion is not there. The initial diagnosis is usually made on an MRI with lesions manifesting as abnormal long segment cord hyperintensity with associated expansion and flow voids with or without cord enhancement. The definitive diagnosis is usually made on DSA. The three cases discussed above highlight the importance of doing a complete spinal DSA including evaluation of internal iliac arteries. This becomes more important if the patient has MRI findings suggestive of SDAVF and routine spinal angiography fails to demonstrate the fistula. The failure to perform complete spinal DSA in such cases would result into unnecessary delay in diagnosis leading to delayed treatment resulting in poor patient outcome.

References

1.
Krings T, Geibprasert S. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(4):639-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Jellema K, Tijssen CC, van Gijn J. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: A congestive myelopathy that initially mimics a peripheral nerve disorder. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 12):3150-64. Doi: 10.1093/brain/awl220. Epub 2006 Aug 18. PMID: 16921175. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Nishio A, Ohata K, Takami T, Nishikawa M, Hara M. Atypical spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with supply from the lateral sacral artery. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14(1):65-68. Doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.10.020. Epub 2006 Nov 7. PMID: 17092723. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Anson JA, Spetzler RF. Classification of spinal arteriovenous malformations and implications for treatment [Article in Japanese]. BNI Q. 1992,8:02-08.
5.
Maimon S, Luckman Y, Strauss I. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: A review. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2016;(43):111-37. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21359-0_5. PMID: 26508408. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Cao W, Huang L, Ge L, Lu G, Zhang X, Dong Q. A simple score (AVFS) to identify spinal dural arteriovenous fistula before spinal digital subtraction angiography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(8):1995-2000. Doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.01.021. Epub 2014 Aug 6. PMID: 25106829. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Gemmete J, Chaudhary N, Elias A, Toma A, Pandey A, Parker R, et al. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: Clinical experience with endovascular treatment as a primary therapy at 2 academic referral centers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(10):1974-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Grossman RI, Yousem DM. Neuroradiology, The Requisites. Mosby Inc. (2003) ISBN:032300508X.
9.
Larsen DW, Halbach VV, Teitelbaum GP, McDougall CG, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, et al. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas supplied by branches of the internal iliac arteries. Surg Neurol. 1995;43(1):35-40; discussion 40-1. Doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(95)80035-f. PMID: 7701420. [crossref]
10.
Gilbertson JR, Miller GM, Goldman MS, Marsh WR. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: MR and myelographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16(10):2049-57. PMID: 8585493.
11.
Hurst RW, Grossman RI. Peripheral spinal cord hypointensity on T2-weighted MR images: A reliable imaging sign of venous hypertensive myelopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(4):781-86. PMID: 10782797.
12.
Morris JM. Imaging of dural arteriovenous fistula. Radiol Clin North Am. 2012;50(4):823-39. Doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.011. PMID: 22643397. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Van Dijk JM, TerBrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Farb RI, Wallace MC. Multidisciplinary management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: Clinical presentation and long-term follow-up in 49 patients. Stroke. 2002;33(6):1578-83. Doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000018009.83713.06. PMID: 12052994. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Gioppo A, Faragò G, Giannitto C, Caputi L, Saladino A, Acerbi F, et al. Sacral dural arteriovenous fistulas: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge-single-centre experience of 13 cases and review of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(4):415-21. Doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013307. Epub 2017 Oct 12. PMID: 29025963. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Aggarwal S, Willinsky R, Montanera W, Terbrugge K, Wallace MC. Superselective angiography of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula having a common segmental origin with the artery of Adamkiewicz. Neuroradiology. 1992;34(4):352-54. Doi: 10.1007/BF00588203. PMID: 1528454. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Djindjian M, Ribeiro A, Ortega E, Gaston A, Poirier J. The normal vascularization of the intradural filum terminale in man. Surg Radiol Anat. 1988;10(3):201-09. Doi: 10.1007/BF02115238. PMID: 3147533. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Parke WW, Gammell K, Rothman RH. Arterial vascularization of the cauda equina. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(1):53-62. PMID: 7005240. [crossref]
18.
Namba K, Niimi Y, Ishiguro T, Higaki A, Toma N, Komiyama M. Cauda equina and filum terminale arteriovenous fistulas: Anatomic and radiographic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(11):2166-70. Doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6813. Epub 2020 Oct 8. PMID: 33033040; PMCID: PMC7658832. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51659.15905

Date of Submission: Jul 31, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Sep 14, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 02, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 02, 2021
• Manual Googling: Oct 25, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 03, 2021 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com