Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 104833

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : WC05 - WC08 Full Version

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Terbinafine with Itraconazole or Griseofulvin Combination Therapy in the Management of Dermatophytosis- A Randomised Clinical Trial


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/50884.15831
A Ramesh, S Devasena, Dhanyamol Mathew

1. Professor, Department of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital and Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital and Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Postgraduate Student, Department of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital and Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Dhanyamol Mathew,
Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: dhanyarosemathew@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Dermatophytosis is a common fungal infection caused by Trichophyton, Epidermophyton, Microsporum species. Combination of systemic and topical antifungal therapy is in vogue for all patients with dermatophytosis, except in cases of localised naïve Tinea. Recently, a rising prevalence of poor response to standard regimen of treatment has been noted. In this study, we tried to find out the benefits and adverse effects of systemic antifungal combination therapy in the treatment of tinea.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of oral terbinafine with itraconazole or griseofulvin combination therapy in the management of dermatophytosis and to assess the adverse effects associated with these combination therapies.

Materials and Methods: The present randomised clinical trial comprised of 60 patients with dermatophytosis who were divided into two groups. The study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology, Outpatient Department (OPD), Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from December 2020 to May 2021. Group I was treated with terbinafine 250 mg OD and itraconazole 200 mg OD and group II with terbinafine 250 mg OD with griseofulvin 250 mg BD for a period of four weeks and the patients were followed-up every two weeks with appropriate investigations. Outcome of the treatment was assessed at four weeks and eight weeks. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Descriptive analyses were performed to compare the baseline characteristics of the participants between the two study groups. Student t-test was applied to compare the mean values of quantitative variables. Chi-square test was used for analysing the categorical variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results: Itraconazole containing group reported a better clinical cure rate than the griseofulvin containing group (p<0.05). Neither of the combination showed effectiveness against tinea infections pretreated with topical steroid containing formulations.

Conclusion: Combination of terbinafine with itraconazole produce higher clinical cure rate as compared to the combination of terbinafine with griseofulvin; but the percentage of clinical cure rate is less as compared to published studies in the past. Neither of the combination of systemic antifungals has shown efficacy against tinea infections pretreated with topical steroid containing formulations.

Keywords

Chronic dermatophytosis, Systemic antifungals, Tinea infections, Topical steroid formulations

Fungal infections are a major concern for both patients and treating physician, especially those affecting skin. Dermatophytosis/tinea is one of the most common skin diseases affecting people across the world; caused by superficial fungus which invade and multiply within the keratinised tissue (skin, hair, nails). Approximately, 20-25% of the world population is affected by tinea (1). Over the last 40 years, there have been significant advances in the management of this condition starting from simple antiseptics with non specific antifungal activity to the specific antifungal drugs available present day (2).

Major fungi causing dermatophytosis are Trichophyton, Microsporum, and Epidermophyton (3). Recently, there is a change in the pattern of tinea seen as an increase in the occurrence of difficult to treat recalcitrant, recurrent, and chronic dermatophytosis (4). Various factors such as global warming, hot and humid climate, migration of laborers, increased frequency of wearing tight and synthetic clothing, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, increasing prevalence of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and poor compliance of patients are reasons for the treatment resistant tinea (5),(6). Apart from this, another major factor contributing to this is the widespread abuse of topical steroid antifungal combination creams by the patients, mostly available as an Over The Counter (OTC) purchase or when prescribed by practitioners or quacks (7).

Terbinafine, the first line systemic drug for the treatment of dermatophytosis, acts by inhibiting the enzyme squalene epoxidase involved in the synthesis of ergosterol which is necessary for the formation of fungal cell membrane (8). Itraconazole has fungistatic action through the inhibition of 14α-demethylase and griseofulvin causes disruption of microtubule spindle formation and thereby inhibits the fungal cell wall synthesis (9).

A combination therapy of systemic antifungal drugs with different mechanism of action enhances the cure rate and helps prevent drug resistance based on the concept of synergistic and additive effects of two or more drugs (10). There is lacunae of studies in literature evaluating the efficacy and safety of systemic antifungal combination therapy with terbinafine, itraconazole and griseofulvin in the management of dermatophytosis. In this study we made an attemp to find out the benefits and adverse effects of various systemic combination therapy for the treatment of tinea. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy of oral terbinafine in combination with either itraconazole or griseofulvin and to assess the adverse effects associated with this combination therapy. The null hypothesis of the present study was that, there was no significant difference in the therapeutic outcome of oral terbinafine in combination with either itraconazole or griseofulvin.

Material and Methods

A comparative non blinded randomised clinical trial was conducted among 60 patients with dermatophytosis who attended the OPD of Department of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, between December 2020 to May 2021. The trial was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee- No:26122020.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated to be 60 using OpenEpi software with 95% level of confidence, power of 80% and considering cure rate of 79%. The study population was randomly divided in two groups. Randomisation of the subjects was done using simple random sampling using lottery system. Due to the development of adverse effects, two patients were excluded from the study and one was lost to follow-up.

Inclusion criteria: Patients >18 years with Tinea corporis, Tinea cruris, Tinea faciei with total body surface area involved at least 50% were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria: Age <18 years, pregnant and lactating women, patient who were allergic to terbinafine/itraconazole/griseofulvin, h/o of intake of oral antifungals in last one month, patients with cardiac, renal, and hepatic disease, abnormal complete haemogram, renal function test and liver function test were excluded in this study.

Study Procedure

Patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent from the patient. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by random sampling using lottery system; each group consisting of 30 members; Group I was treated with oral terbinafine 250 mg OD (Terbest 250, manufactured by Systopic Laboratories Pvt., Ltd.,) with oral itraconazole 200 mg OD (Itrasys 200 mg, manufactured by Systopic Laboratories Pvt., Ltd.,) PO for four weeks and group II received oral terbinafine 250 mg OD with oral griseofulvin 250 mg BD (Grisovin FP 250 mg, manufactured by GSK pharmaceuticals) PO for four weeks. Patients were evaluated for the severity of clinical parameters namely erythema, and scaled using four-point scale as: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe (11).

At the time of initial visit and at the end of second and fourth weeks of treatment, Complete Blood Count (CBC), Liver Function Test (LFT), and Electrocardiography (ECG) were repeated in the terbinafine with itraconazole group and CBC and LFT in the terbinafine with griseofulvin group. Topical antifungals were not prescribed to both groups. Both groups received liquid paraffin and non sedative antihistamines as a part of supportive care. The patients were asked about any side effects experienced during the treatment course. Patients were followed-up at every two weeks interval up to a maximum of eight weeks (four weeks after therapy or cure, whichever occurred earlier). They were followed-up during the treatment period and also four weeks after the treatment completion Body Surface Area (BSA) was calculated using ‘Rule of 9’.

Outcome measurements were as follows:

• Cured (complete clinical resolution of all lesions).
• Partially cured {more than 50% improvement in the involved total BSA} and
• Failure (increase in severity of the lesions or no improvement in the lesions after four weeks of starting antifungal agents or less than 50% involved total BSA improvement).
Statistical Analysis

Analysis of data was done using SPSS software version 16.0. Descriptive analyses were performed to compare the baseline characteristics of the participants between the two study groups. Student t-test was applied to compare the mean values of quantitative variables. Chi-square test was used for analysing the categorical variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Patients who were excluded from study due to adverse reactions or lost to follow-up were not included in the data analysis (n=57).

Results

A total of 60 participants were enrolled in the study with tinea infections which mainly affected the trunk, groin, and face. Two subjects were excluded due to adverse drug reactions and one lost to follow-up. The remaining 57 subjects were then segregated into two groups, that is group I and group II with n=29 and n=28, respectively (with n signifying the number of subjects) (Table/Fig 1).

The (Table/Fig 2) demonstrates that the age, sex, and disease duration were constant. The mean age of participants was calculated to be 36.47±11.03 years. Statistically, 64.9% of the overall participants were females and 66.7% of the entire study group belonged to the age group of 18-40 years. It was seen that 75.4% of the patients had the disease duration for less than or equal to six months. Majorly, 71.9% of the participants had a history of topical medicines application and 43.9% applied topical steroid combination cream prior to the first visit to OPD. Meanwhile, it was noted 21.1% have taken systemic drugs before the initial visit to our OPD. From the study, it was also noted that 54.4% of present patients had similar complaints in the family and seven out of the 57 patients were suffering from diabetes mellitus.

The (Table/Fig 3) shows, 71.9% of the patients included in this study were suffering from Tinea corporis et cruris and the baseline mean erythema and scaling score were found to be similar in both groups (p>0.05).

The (Table/Fig 4) shows that at four and eight weeks, erythema and scaling score were significantly improved as compared to the baseline values in both the groups (p<0.001), slightly higher improvement noted in the group I. This result indirectly implies that the clinical features of patients at the end of fourth and eight weeks improved in both groups due to the treatment given. There was no significant difference in the mean erythema score at eight weeks between both the groups (p=0.07); whereas mean scaling score at eight weeks significantly improved in the group I as compared to group II (p=0.02).

Statistical analysis of haematological investigations showed minimal decrease in the level of haemoglobin, White Blood Cells (WBC) and platelet count at the end of fourth week as compared to the baseline value in both group I and II (p<0.001); but the mean values were within the normal range at the end of four weeks. Mean values of total bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) were raised at the end of four weeks treatment in both groups; but lied within the normal range. Baseline and ECG reports at the end of fourth week were within normal limits in all patients of group I.

The (Table/Fig 5) demonstrates that, at the end of four weeks, 9 (31%) people in group I and 5 (17.9%) people in the group II were completely cured. Meanwhile, at the end of eight weeks, 14 (48.3%) in group I and 6 (21.4%) patients in group II were completely cured. Clinical cure rates were high in itraconazole containing group at 4 and eight weeks than the group containing griseofulvin which was statistically significant.

The percentage of partially cured people at the end of four weeks in group I and group II were 58.6% and 17.9%, respectively. Whereas, at the end of eight weeks, 44.8% of people in group I and 21.4% in group II were partially cured of the infection. The failure rate of combination therapy seen in group I and II were 6.9% and 57.1%, respectively at the end of eight weeks.

As (Table/Fig 6) depicts, there was no association between the duration of the infection and previous topical steroid application with treatment response in both groups (p-value was not statistically significant).

Adverse drug reactions were reported in three patients. In group I, one patient experienced lichenoid drug eruption. One patient in group II developed severe burning and itching sensation over the body and another one had a headache.

Discussion

In this study, combination of terbinafine with itraconazole produced higher clinical cure rate as compared to the combination of terbinafine with griseofulvin used; but the percentage of clinical cure rates in both groups were less when compared to similar studies published in the past. This indicates that susceptibility of fungal organism to the combination of systemic therapy has reduced recently. Itraconazole with terbinafine study group yielded a better cure rate when compared to terbinafine and griseofulvin group.

Indication for systemic therapy in dermatophytosis are extensive tinea corporis, involvement of multiple sites, recurrent or chronic dermatophytosis, immunocompromised patients, non responsive to topical antifungals, tinea involving scalp, palms and soles (12),(13). Patients with chronic or recalcitrant cases and tinea infections pretreated with topical steroid containing formulations need treatment for a longer duration than the naïve tinea (14),(15). Wide variety of systemic antifungals are available for the treatment of tinea which consists of terbinafine, griseofulvin, itraconazole and fluconazole. Out of these, the commonly prescribed drugs are itraconazole and terbinafine as the other two require a longer duration. Terbinafine is the only fungicidal drug among these.

In present study, majority of the patients were females (64.9%). In another study, by Singh SK et al., reported predominance of male patients (16). This shows an increasing trend about the concern regarding cosmetological impact in dermatological diseases among women. It may also be due to the unbearable symptoms. Majority of the study population belonged to the age group of 18-40 years. Most common variant seen in present study was tinea corporis et tinea cruris (71.9%), which is same as reported in the previous studies (11),(16),(17),(18). In present study, 43.9% patients had a previous history of topical steroid containing cream application and 54.4% had the history of similar complaints in the family. The main factors contributing to the resistance are easy availability of steroid containing topical antifungal creams OTC and persistence of infectious foci in the house, when the family members are simultaneously affected. It was seen that 75.4% of the patients had the disease duration of less than or equal to six months. Sharma P et al., also reported the same duration (11).

As previously mentioned, current study showed a comparatively better complete clinical cure rate with terbinafine and itraconazole (48.3%). This value was lesser as compared to the study conducted by Sharma P et al., and Singh SK et al. Sharma P et al., reported 90% complete clinical cure rate and Singh SK et al., reported 79.2% clinical and mycological cure rate after three weeks and four weeks of combination therapy respectively (11),(16). The clinical cure rate of terbinafine with griseofulvin group in our study was only 21.4%. Singh S et al., reported a clinical cure rate of 28.8% which is almost comparable to our study (19). In this study, neither of the combinations showed effectiveness against tinea infections pre-treated with topical steroid containing formulations.

Adverse drug reaction was reported in three patients. One had burning and itching sensation and another one experienced headache in griseofulvin containing group. In itraconazole containing group one had lichenoid drug eruption. No one developed significant derangement of liver function. Sharma P et al., reported diffuse hair fall, gastritis, constipation, unpleasant taste in the combination group (11). Teraki Y and Shiohara T and Zheng Y et al., have reported lichenoid drug eruption following terbinafine therapy (20),(21). Bailey EM et al., and Tucker RM et al., have reported erectile dysfunction as a rare side effect following itraconazole therapy (22),(23). Singh S et al., found no adverse effects in terbinafine with griseofulvin group (19).

Limitation(s)

This study was limited by it’s small sample size and short follow-up duration. Mycological investigations (culture with antifungal susceptibility and Potassium hydroxide examination) and pharmacokinetic studies were not done. Effectiveness of continuation of same treatment regimen for an extended duration in the partially cured group was not assessed. Further studies with a large sample size with mycological investigations and pharmacokinetic studies will throw more light on this topic.

Conclusion

Combination of terbinafine with itraconazole produces higher clinical cure rate as compared to the combination of terbinafine with griseofulvin; but the percentage of clinical cure rate was less when compared to published studies in the past. Neither of the combination showed effectiveness against tinea infections pretreated with topical steroid containing formulations. Strict legislation against irrational use of topical corticosteroid antifungal combination cream is the need of the hour. Awareness has to be made among the general practitioners regarding incorrect use of topical steroid-antifungal preparations. Sensitisation among the public regarding the general measures in prevention of tinea and proper treatment of their family members will also help to reduce the burden of infection.

References

1.
Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M. Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Mycose. 2008;51:02-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Hay R. Therapy of skin, hair and nail fungal infections. J. Fungi (Basel). 2018;4(3):99. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Rajabian A, Hosseinzadeh H. Dermatological effects of nigella sativa and its constituent, thymoquinone. In: Preedy VR, Watson RR, editors. Nuts and Seeds in Health and Disease Prevention. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2020. Pp. 329-55. [crossref]
4.
Dogra S, Uprety S. The menace of chronic and recurrent dermatophytosis in India: Is the problem deeper than we perceive? Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7(2):73-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Rengasamy M, Chellam J, Ganapati S. Systemic therapy of dermatophytosis: Practical and systematic approach. Clin Derm Rev. 2017;1(3):19. [crossref]
6.
Babu PR, Pravin A, Deshmukh G, Dhoot D, Samant A, Kotak B. Efficacy and safety of terbinafine 500 mg once daily in patients with dermatophytosis. Indian J Dermatol. 2017;62:395-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Dutta B, Rasul E, Boro B. Clinico-epidemiological study of tinea incognito with microbiological correlation. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017;83(3):326. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Lipner SR, Scher RK. Onychomycosis: Treatment and prevention of recurrence. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(4):853-67 [crossref]
9.
Gupta AK, Mays RR, Versteeg SG, Piraccini BM, Shear NH, Piguet V, et al. Tinea capitis in children: A systematic review of management. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(12):2264-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Johnson MD, MacDougall C, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Perfect JR, Rex JH. Combination antifungal therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:693-715. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Sharma P, Bhalla M, Thami GP, Chander J. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of oral terbinafine and itraconazole combination therapy in the management of dermatophytosis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31(7):749-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Gupta AK, Chaudhry M, Elewski B. Tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea nigra, and piedra. Dermatol Clin. 2003;21:395 400. [crossref]
13.
Ellis D, Watson A. Systemic antifungal agents for cutaneous fungal infections. Aust Prescr. 1996;19:72-75. [crossref]
14.
Janaki VR. Therapeutic options in mycoses. In: Sentamilselvi G, Janaki VR, Janaki C, editors. The Hand book of Dermatomycology & Colour Atlas. 1st ed.. India: Sentamilselvi; 2006. Pp. 61-82
15.
Thursky KA, Playford EG, Seymour JF, Sorrel TC, Ellis DH, Guy SD, et al. Recommendations for the treatment of established fungal infections. Intern Med J. 2008;38:496-520. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Singh SK, Subba N, Tilak R. Efficacy of terbinafine and itraconazole in different doses and in combination in the treatment of tinea infection: A randomized controlled parallel group open labeled trial with clinico mycological correlation. Indian J Dermatol. 2020;65:284-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Mahajan S, Tilak R, Kaushal SK, Mishra RN, Pandey SS. Clinico-mycological study of dermatophytic infections and their sensitivity to antifungal drugs in a tertiary care center. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017;83:436-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Singh BS, Tripathy T, Kar BR, Ray A. clinicomycological study of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India: A cross- sectional study. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2020;11:46-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Singh S, Anchan VN, Raheja R. Futility of combining griseofulvin and terbinafine in current epidemic of altered dermatophytosis in India: Results of a randomized pragmatic trial [Internet]. medRxiv. 2019 [cited 2021 Oct 28]. Pp. 19007617. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/19007617v1. [crossref]
20.
Teraki Y, Shiohara T. Spontaneous tolerance to terbinafine-induced lichenoid drug eruption. Dermatology. 2004;208:81-82. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Zheng Y, Zhang J, Chen H, Lai W, Maibach HI. Terbinafine-induced lichenoid drug eruption. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017;36:101-03. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Bailey EM, Krakovsky DJ, Rybak MJ. The triazole antifungal agents: A review of itraconazole and fluconazole. Pharmacotherapy. 1990;10:146-53.
23.
Tucker RM, Haq Y, Denning DW, Stevens DA. Adverse events associated with itraconazole in 189 patients on chronic therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990;26:561-66. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/50884.15831

Date of Submission: Jun 14, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Sep 18, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 23, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 15, 2021
• Manual Googling: Sep 17, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Nov 24, 2021 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com