Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 121256

AbstractConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : November | Volume : 16 | Issue : 11 | Page : GE01 - GE07 Full Version

Role of Mitochondrial Dynamics in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Dysfunction


Published: November 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/59325.17165
Tejas Dilip Tajane, Pranita Jwalant Waghmare, Bharati Amar Taksande, Prafulla Shriram Ambulkar, Jwalant Eknath Waghmare

1. Junior Research Fellow, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Research Scientist, Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jwalant Eknath Waghmare,
Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: jewaghmare@mgims.ac.in

Abstract

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is influenced by the action of both hereditary and environmental factors. These factors are comprehended in the disease interaction with β cells and insulin sensitivity to the receptors.The main cause of T2DM development is ageing, obesity, and oxidative stress. The dysfunction of the β cells of the pancreas leads to insulin insensitivity in the liver, muscle and fat metabolism. These occur due to the result of oxidative stress. Lipid peroxidation is a key initiating factor in the development of oxidative stress, which results in T2DM and its related micro-and macro-vascular problems. These are initially compensated for the generation of excess insulin synthesis, thus ensuring normal glucose tolerance. When these compensatory processes are disrupted, the majority of persons develop T2DM. Although the gene is the primary cause of T2DM, the environment also plays an important role in the disease’s progression. Particularly, a sedentary lifestyle characterised by excessive food consumption and physical inactivity is a known risk factor for obesity and type 2 diabetes. This review has briefly discussed the significance of numerous causal factors, and genomic and biochemical pathways which are responsible for increasing the production of oxidative stress, a crucial component for the etiology and development of T2DM. The conclusion drawn was that the analysis of oxidative stress markers may be one of the potential methods for the diagnosis and prognosis of T2DM. Furthermore, this review will be helpful to establish the broaden conceptual framework for future studies on oxidative stress with relation to etiology of type 2 diabetes and therapeutic development.

Keywords

Insulin sensitivity, Oxidative markers, Oxidative stress

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a major public health concern in the global population. It makes a significant contribution to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. According to International Diabetes Federation 2021, its prevalence in lowincome and middle-income countries has increased dramatically. Low-income countries are more likely to have the disease than high-income countries. It also reported that diabetes has impacted 90 million people in Southeast Asia in 2021, with 77 million of them living in India, making it the world’s largest diabetes-affected country. These have increased over the last three decades; by 2030, the number of people with diabetes will have risen to 643 million, and by 2045, it will have risen to 783 million, with diabetes accounting for approximately 747,000 deaths in 2021 (1). The statistics of the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2019 state that deaths caused by diabetes are 1.5 million and 48% of deaths occur before attaining the age of 70 years (2).

The T2DM is a chronic non communicable disease caused due to insulin deficiency and a prolonged period of hyperglycaemia. It is linked to the inactivity of beta cells in the Langerhans’ islets, as well as insulin synthesis and action (3). Insulin is the primary regulator of blood sugar levels; however, the sensitivity of insulin receptors is also altered and found to be lower in those with T2DM. T2DM is caused by a malfunction of metabolic pathways in lipolysis, excessive insulin synthesis or insulin resistance, and obesity (4). T2DM damages every organ, and the severity of the damage is determined by the organ’s participation during the length of the disease. Hyperglycaemia, an elevated level of blood sugar, has an effect on the mitochondria, which leads to oxidative stress, which causes cell damage. Oxidative stress causes dysfunction in a variety of tissues, including pancreatic beta cells, liver cells, and cardiovascular cells, and that also leads to the ageing process. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are the primary cause of insulin malfunction (5),(6).

The T2DM is caused by prolonged hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidemia, which are caused by obesity and ageing. High levels of free fatty acids or triglycerides in the peripheral circulation and a lack of physical activity are two factors linked to T2DM (7),(8). Ignorance of symptoms results in illness exacerbation, increased risk of stroke, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lower respiratory infection (Table/Fig 1).

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Mitochondria evolved from α-proteobacteria, a free-living organism, and integrated into eukaryotes via the endosymbiont phenomenon (9),(10),(11),(12). There are significant similarities between mitochondrial and bacterial genomes. They share common traits such as a circular, double-stranded, and supercoiled genome and are divided through binary fission. The length of Mitochondrial Deoxyribonucleic Acid (mtDNA) varies from species to species. For instance, it is roughly 75 to 80 kb in budding yeast and ~16.5 kb in humans (13). Mitochondria play a pivotal role in the production of Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) via oxidative phosphorylation, which serves as an energy substrate in living cells (14). The mtDNA encodes for 37 genes, of these 13 genes are involved in the formation of multi-subunit complexes that are essential for the synthesis of energy production through Electron Transport Chain (ETC) pathways (15),(16). This complex is found on the inner mitochondrial membrane. The mtDNA is classified into two strands depending upon guanine concentration; Heavy Strand (H-strand) and Light strand (L-strand). The H-strand encodes 28 genes, while the L-strand encodes 9 genes. This has distinct replication zones with the creation of a displacement loop. Complex I has seven subunits encoded by mtDNA; NADH Dehyrogenase (ND)1, ND2, ND3, ND4, ND4L, ND5, and ND6; complex III has one component cytochrome b; complex IV has three subunits Cyclooxygenase (COX)I, COXII, COXIII; and complex V has two subunits ATP6 and ATP8 (17). The nuclear genome (nDNA) encodes all complex II subunits and other assembly factors which are essential for oxidative phosphorylation (18). The mtDNA is inherited from the maternal side during conception through oocytes (19). The morphology of the mitochondria is significantly robust and they can alter their shape depending upon the metabolic requirement of the cell (20). Human mitochondrial replication occurs independently of the normal cell cycle, which explains why the number of mitochondrial copies varies in different cell types (21). The presence of both wildtype and mutated mtDNA is referred to as heteroplasmy. This is controlled by the mitochondrial fission and fusion mechanism. This is revived in (4),(22),(23),(24). When the ratio of wild-type to mutant mtDNA surpasses a certain physiochemical threshold, the biochemical pathways are hindered and lead to metabolic syndromes.

There is a high-risk of DNA damage due to a lack of histone, frequent exposure to ROS and a weak repair system (25). This causes a mutation in mtDNA. The mutation causes mtDNA alternation and leads to the accumulation of base substitution, missense, point, deletion and duplication mutations and large-scale rearrangement. It is determined by the probability of homoplasmy (the presence of all identical copies of mitochondria in a cell that may be normal or mutated) and heteroplasmy in the mitochondria. Different levels of deletion in different cells result in varying degrees of dysfunction (26). Chomyn A et al., and Hayashi J et al., confirmed that transfer Ribonucleic Acid (t-RNA) mutation or deletion, can sustain deletion or mutation impact, 10% wild type is sufficient to regulate the normal homeostasis of the cell (27),(28). To exhibit a clinical phenotype, the heteroplasmy pathogenic threshold level must be greater than 90% (28).

A homoplasmic condition leads to a variety of point mutations, while a heteroplasmic condition leads to large-scale deletion (29). The prevalence of large-scale deletion is minimal under normal conditions but elevated during mitochondrial disorders. The mitochondrial deletion occurs in regions ranging from 1.8-8 kb, resulting in the loss of protein-coding genes, tRNA, and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes (30). As a result, some places are more likely to become deletion hotspots. Ding Y et al., confirmed that the t-RNAleu(URR) A3243G and ND6 T14502C point mutation are associated with Maternally Inherited Diabetes and Deafness (MIDD) which affects glucose metabolism (31). The person suffering from MIDD has various clinical symptoms such as hearing loss, cardiomyopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy. Prior detection of this mutation is critical to provide clinical aid to MIDD patients. These sites are also more prone to other mitochondrial disorders also such as neurodegenerative disorder (Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease), MELAS (Mitochondrial Encephalopathy with Lactic Acidosis and Stroke-like episodes) and myopathy (32).

MITOCHONDRIAL REPAIR SYSTEM IN DIABETES MELLITUS

The DNA damage caused by ROS is a key source of point mutations and large-scale deletions. This occurs due to the replication machinery slippage. This is frequently present in 4977kb to ~7.5 kb (common deletion site) (Table/Fig 2), resulting in a variety of mitochondrial-associated diseases, cancer, and ageing. Kearns-Sayer syndrome, myopathies, diabetes, and deafness are all caused by distinct deletion mutations (33). Deletion mutation is induced not only by the replication slippage mechanism but also by dysfunction in the break repair system. Extrinsic and intrinsic factors are used to bring deletion into the cell. Ionising radiation, ultraviolet light, smoke, heavy metal ions such as Fe, Cu, Cd, Ni and As, ozone, and air pollution are extrinsic factors and ROS, dual oxidase, lipoxygenase, cyclooxygenase are intrinsic factors (34). Both of these factors are capable of causing a Double-stranded Break (DSB) in mtDNA. As a result, the replication and repair machinery tend to fail safeguard to the mtDNA. In eukaryotes, two types of DSB repair systems are present. These are Homology-directed Recombination (HDR) and Nonhomologous End Join (NHEJ). The HDR relies on the detection and repair of mtDNA breaks by referencing the homologous template. In contrast, NHEJ, re-ligated the DSBinduced broken end of mtDNA. Another process that resembles NHEJ is known as Micro-homology Mediated End Joining (MMEJ). It ligates the blunt end of the DSB with a short homologous base pair. It causes the flap-like structure during ligation, which is then deteriorated during end joining. This results in small-scale deletion (35). In mtDNA large-scale deletion, DSB has typically flanked with the short repeats. These short repeats confirmed the presence of a recombination event. DSB repair with HDR, NHEJ and MMEJ could promote the error-prone intramolecular recombination and the linearisation of mtDNA event results in deletion mutation (36). The main culprit causing deletion in the mtDNA is the repair system (37). Long-term exposure to ROS and inefficient ROS scavenging mechanism induces the accumulation of mutations, which leads to faulty physiological and biochemical processes.

In mitochondria, Base Excision Repair (BER) processes operate with remarkable fidelity. The mitochondria and the nucleus both contain sub-compartmentalised forms of the majority of BER enzymes. These are fulfilling the needs of replication and repair activities and are cross-communicating with one another via mitochondrial and nuclear localisation signalling. The mitochondria include a number of proteins that are linked with BER (38). For instance, the Uracil-DNA Glycosylase (UNG)1 isoform, which is unique to the mitochondria, and the protein variations 8-Oxoguanine–DNA Glycosylase (OGG)-1b, OGG1-1c, and OGG1-2a, AP Endonuclease1, Flap Endonuclease (FEN)1 are other BER proteins with mitochondrial localisation signalling encoded in their isoforms (39). The ExoG nuclease and the enzyme responsible for deleting flaps produced by long-patch BER are the primary examples of proteins with unique mitochondrial localisation. In cells lacking BER proteins, there are higher concentrations of mtDNA with deletion mutations. For instance, mice lacking the glycosylase Nei like DNA Glycosylase 1 demonstrated metabolic syndrome, and their liver cells exhibited higher mtDNA damage and indications of mtDNA deletions and/or rearrangements (40). There is compelling evidence that the mitochondrial BER operates properly and mitigates the harm caused by large-scale deletion. However, a decreased level of mitochondrial BER causes mtDNA deletions. The maintenance of the genetic information encoding the proteins of the electron transport chain is ensured by the repair of abasic sites and oxidised bases by BER, which may lower the probability of developing mtDNA mutations (36).

ROLE OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES (ROS) IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF T2DM

During inefficacious oxidative phosphorylation, ROS are produced, which are metabolic hazardous compounds capable of causing cell stress and mutation, resulting in disorder. When it is produced in a controlled manner it acts as a signalling molecule (41). In biological systems, ROS are a category of highly reactive chemicals. It is made up of many reactive species, some of which are produced from oxygen and others from nitrogen (42). The mitochondria are the primary sites of oxidation, where oxidation enzymes convert molecular oxygen to radical oxygen; NADPH oxidase (NOX), and as well as ROS produced in other non mitochondrial loci i.e., peroxisomes by cytochrome P450 (43). Superoxide (O2-),hydroxyl radical (OH), peroxyl (RO2), and hydroxyl peroxyl (HRO2-)are examples of oxygen-derived free radicals, while H2O2 and hypochlorous acid (HOCl) are examples of oxygen non radicals.RON, like ROS, is made up of free radicals such as nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2-), as well as non radical species like alkyl peroxy-nitrite (RONOO-), nitrous oxide (HNO2), and peroxy-nitrite (ONOO-). The key contributions of products in metabolic pathways are superoxide, nitric oxide, and peroxy-nitrite. The thiyl radical (RS) and tyrosyl radical (TR) are two more reactive species formed in the metabolic pathways of ROS and RON (44).

H+ + O2 + e- ? HO2 • (hydroperoxyl radical)
HO2 • ? H+ + O2 •- (superoxide radical)
O2 •- + 2H+ + e- ? H2O2 (Hydrogen Peroxide)
H2O2 + e- ? OH- + OH• (hydroxyl radical)

ROS damages a nucleic acid structure, proteins, and lipids due to its strong reactivity, and volatility. It is a major component in the development of diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, ageing, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and sarcopenia (45). ROS damages the Kreb’s cycle and the ETC, both of which are essential for complete glucose oxidation. The release of hydrogen ions or protons during ETC is primarily responsible for the synthesis of ATP by inner mitochondrial complex V, as well as the formation of oxygen and nitrogen reactive metabolites (ROS and RON). Short-lived free radicles like superoxide anion (O-) are produced when an electron is lost during ETC through NADPH oxidase (NOX). Immune cells also use the same mechanism to counter the foreign particles by the production of ROS via the NOX2 system (46). It is also important in cell signalling; cytokine and growth factor stimulation initiate the downregulation cascade and ROS acts as a secondary messenger, regulating gene expression. An increase in ROS levels not only impairs cell integrity, but also has an impact on cell proliferation, growth, and dysfunction of antioxidants leading to apoptosis (47). To reduce the effect of ROS and RON in cells, there is a compensating mechanism in place. There are two types of antioxidants enzymatic and non enzymatic. The enzymatic antioxidants have the capacity to counter the oxidative stress directly acting upon the reactive species. This enzymatic antioxidant contains Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), bilirubin, Catalase (CAT), and Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX). Other important antioxidant enzymes like Glutathione Reductase (GR), Peroxiredoxins (Prx), Thioredoxin (Trx), Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR), and Glutaredoxins (Grx) also aim to safeguard cells by reducing oxidised critical thiols in important enzymes and proteins and by preserving the proper intracellular redox state (45),(46),(47),(48). Endogenous substances including reduced Glutathione (GSH), uric acid and bilirubin, are included in the non enzymatic system, along with vitamins (vitamins A,C, and E), beta-carotene, flavonoids, polyphenols, zinc, and selenium (49). Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) converts reactive superoxide into H2O2, which is less reactive, more stable, and permeable to the plasma membrane (50),(51). This H2O2 is diffused to the cytosol, where the cytosolic antioxidant such as catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and thioredoxin peroxidase catalysed the neutralisation of H2O2 into H2O (water) and O2 (oxygen). Cu-Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD are antioxidant enzymes of the SOD family. The quantity of H2O2 is increased by the Fenton reaction and the Haber-Weiss reaction, and it is eliminated from the cell by cytosolic and peroxisome antioxidants (52),(53). Downregulation of these enzymes results in irregulated neutralising reactive species pathways (ROS and RON).

Catalase is a peroxisome-present enzyme that catalyses the reduction of H2O2. The catalase gene (CAT gene) is found on the 11th chromosome in humans (54). Variation in the CAT gene causes various diseases. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in the transcription site causes low expression in the CAT gene which gives rise to diabetes, hypertension, asthma, carcinoma, osteoporosis and insulin resistance (55). These diseases are caused by various SNPs sites on promoter regions such as -262C/T, -844G/A or -844C/T and 1167T/C. In the CAT gene at loci of -262C/T polymorphisms caused by oxidative stress which manifested the clinical syndromes vary along the specific ethnic group. This polymorphism results in decreased activity and the induction of various disorders such as gestational diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, nephrotic syndrome, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular disease, among many others (56). Diabetes alters the morphology of the organs which drastically lowers the rate of catalase expression and also increases oxidative stress protein. In a 2004 experiment on model animals, it was confirmed that the catalase enzyme reduces the effect of ROS in diabetic myocytes. Catalase overexpression in a model organism provides a compensatory mechanism for the effect of ROS. It has also been reported that the recovery of myofibrils and preserves the composition of myocytes and the contractility of the heart (57).

DEFECTIVE METABOLIC PATHWAYS IN T2DM

Dysfunction in mitochondrial not only involves declines in oxidative phosphorylation, but also in various processes such as regulation of redox reaction, Ca++ homeostasis, innate immunity, phagocytosis of bacteria, and apoptosis signalling. Defective mitochondrial metabolic pathways affect both oxidative phosphorylation and insulin production or sensitivity (58). It causes the mitochondrial macromolecule to malfunction, resulting in decreased fatty acid oxidation and lipid build-up in the viscera which also leads to major and minor vascular disease (Table/Fig 3). Pathways that accumulate Diacylglycerol (DAG) and Ceramide (CER), decrease insulin synthesis and signalling. DAG inhibits insulin via the Protein Kinase C (PKC) pathway, while CER inhibits insulin via the Akt route. Both DAG and CER activation leads to insulin resistance and malfunction. Insulin resistance is the marker for the high deposition of fatty acids and triglycerides which are inert metabolic and interfere with insulin actions (59).

The PKC is activated by phosphatidyl serine and calcium and is mainly activated by DAG. It is associated with vasoconstriction, proliferation, extracellular protein production, and smooth muscle growth, all of which are dysregulated in T2DM. Furthermore, the Advanced Glycosylation End product (AGE) is a precursor for the formation of high ROS by NOX, which also activates PKC, endothelin-1 and Nuclear Factor κB (NFκB), leading to dysregulated Mitogen Activating Protein Kinase (MAPK) signalling (60). Additionally, polyol pathways play an important role in the formation of ROS. Through these pathways, elevated ROS triggers a number of proinflammatory pathways in response to ischaemia, impairs angiogenesis, and results in chronic genetic variations that continue to influence the expression of genes even after glycemia returns to normal (61). This mechanism is also involved in cells, where insulin is not necessary for engaging entry, including the retina, kidneys, and peripheral nerves, which are directly involved in late T2DM complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and dementia (62),(63). Adipose tissue is a metabolically dynamic tissue that plays a role in a variety of biological functions, including angiogenesis, immunity, glucose metabolism, and lipid metabolism (7),(64). There are two forms of adipose tissue present in humans. These are White Adipose Tissue (WAT) and Brown Adipose Tissue (BAT). WAT is a high-energy storage molecule, whereas BAT is a heat-generating molecule. During fasting, WAT provides energy by lipolysis, whereas BAT involves in the homeostasis of maintaining body temperature and weight through uncoupling proteins. Uncoupling proteins bypass the oxidation pathway by acting as proton carriers and creating a shunt between the ETC complex and ATP synthase (65). WAT contain a fewer number of mitochondria while BAT contains numerous mitochondrial units.Thus, the outcome of the redox process is minimum in WAT than that of BAT due to imbalance in the number of mitochondria (66). In normal conditions, insulin stimulates the cells to increase glucose absorption and glycogenosis. When the level of free fatty acids in adipocytes increases, it interferes with insulin signalling by impeding glucose absorption and glycogen synthesis. As a result, adipocyte dysfunction disrupts insulin sensitivity and energy generation throughout the body. Increased ROS activity in adipocytes causes mitochondrial malfunction, which impairs thermogenesis and adipogenesis (67). Excessive dietary intake and prolonged periods of inactivity result in fat deposition in the viscera, which alters metabolic pathways via genetic and epigenetic changes. This is a major cause of faulty lipid pathways; as time passes, these effects worsen, resulting in fat deposition in the liver, which inhibits the liver’s ability to operate as the primary site of metabolism (4),(67). The liver, pancreatic beta cells, and skeletal muscles are the most impacted organs in T2DM (7),(45),(67). The therapeutic approach to counter DAG is reviewed in (68).

As priorly stated, ceramide is a causative component in the dysfunction of the Akt pathway. This has been done by activating Protein Phosphatase 2A (PP2A) which dephosphorylated Akt. The Akt signalling system controls lipid and protein metabolism. It functions as a downstream effector in lipid, polypeptide, cell cycle regulator, transcription factor, vesicle trafficking, and metabolic enzymes. It is activated by phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) (69). Akt regulated downstream functions such as protein and lipid kinase by serine-threonine receptor phosphorylation and is also involved in apoptosis and cell cycle maintenance. Insulin-targeted organs or tissues, such as skeletal muscles, liver, and adipose tissue, are involved in Akt. Akt is made up of three subunits: Akt1, Akt2, and Akt3. Akt1 is found in every cell of the body, Akt2 is found in insulin-binding organs such as adipose tissue, muscles, and liver, and Akt3 is found in the testis and brain (70). In response to insulin, the Akt pathway stimulates glycogen production. Akt2 is involved in the insulin-stimulated translocation of GLUT4 transport across the plasma membrane of skeletal muscles, which stimulates glycogen synthesis by activating glycogen synthase and inactivating GSK3 (glycogen synthase kinase 3), which converts glucose-6-phosphate to glycogen. Insulin encourages the production of proteins and the breakdown of fats. Obesity causes insulin resistance by modifying proteins. It depends on the degree of saturation of lipids in the skeletal muscles and liver (71).

EFFECTS OF OXIDATIVE MARKER IN T2DM

Oxidative stress is generated from an imbalance between ROS and the antioxidant mechanism. ROS causes oxidative stress, which activates a variety of biological processes such as apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy. Oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation stimulate autophagy. ROS triggers autophagy by several mechanisms involving changes in the phosphorylation of Ulk1/ATG13, Beclin-1, P62/SQSTM1, AMPK and Foxo3A, leading to damage to the organ structure, especially β cell of the pancreas. The macromolecules of the cell, such as carbohydrate, lipid, protein, and nucleic acid, all undergo molecular changes during oxidative stress. These alterations result in changed macromolecule by-products that serve as oxidative stress markers. This modification is occurred due to insulin insensitivity in adipocytes dysregulation and insulin dysfunction. Oxidative biomarkers are listed in (Table/Fig 4).

Lipid Peroxidation

Linolenic and arachidonic acids are Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFA) that are the principal targets of free radical lipid peroxidation. The lipid alteration leads to instability in fluidity, and integrity of the plasma membrane. MDA, 8-iso-PGF2, TBARS, and HNE are just a few examples of oxidative indicators that can modify lipids and generate aldehyde (5). MDA is generated in lipid peroxidation and involved in the formation of foam cells that leads to atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases (72). MDA and TBARS together form a stable complex substance, MDA-TBRAS adduct. These are capable to react with phospholipid, protein, amino acid, nucleic acid and aldehyde which leads to loss of cell membrane integrity. Isoprostane (8-iso-PGF2) is the prostaglandin-like substance, which is formed by lipid peroxidation of arachidonic acid and present in an esterified form on phospholipid and released as free form by the action of phospholipase, which is detected in a variety of tissues and organs, as well as in body fluid (73),(74). Urine is extensively used for testing oxidative stress markers (75),(76). T2DM markers include elevated levels of MDA and isoprostane which are associated with cardiovascular complications, kidney dysfunction, and altered antioxidant activity.

Protein Oxidation

Protein is a major component of the cell, and it plays a major role in a variety of physio-chemical processes such as transporting organic or inorganic solutes across membranes, cell signalling, cytoskeleton, cell cycle, and catalysis, among many others. Proteins are also targeted by ROS. Protein oxidation leads to cross-linkage, fragmentation, denaturation and proteolysis (77). Protein modification causes a variety of cellular dysfunctions since it is involved in several vital cellular functions. The various amino acids such as serine, cysteine, threonine, glutamine, and tyrosine are found in the side chains of proteins in which tyrosine is primarily affected by ROS and produces a variety of oxidative metabolites, including 3-nitrotyrosine (NY), a class of nitrative stress biomarker, and chlorotyrosine (CY) and bromotyrosine (BY), a class of inflammatory biomarkers (78). The precursor for NY is nitric oxide, which is synthesised by nitric oxide synthase, and CY and BY are synthesised by eosinophile peroxidase and neutrophile myeloperoxidase, respectively (79). Furthermore, advanced oxidative protein products (AOPP) are also a marker for oxidative stress. AOPP is produced by chloramine and hypochlorous acid (HOCL), also known as chloraminated oxidants. It is derived from the plasma protein albumin (80). Plasma protein carbonylation and di-tyrosine promoted cross-linking of protein products. These are associated with ischemic heart disease, endothelial dysfunction, diabetic retinopathy, and other T2DMrelated disorders (81).

DNA and RNA Oxidation

The ROS causes a range of oxidative markers in DNA and RNA, the chief inducers being 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-HdG), and 8-hydroxyguanine (8-HG). Transversion mutation occurs due to these oxidative metabolites resulting in an incorrect linkage between base pairs (82). This phenomenon is highly mutagenic, resulting in diseases such as T2DM, cancer, and CVD, among others. 8-OHdG is eliminated unchanged in the urine and is also found in other body fluids (77). The oxidation of DNA by 8-oxoG activates the base excision repair system, which salvages the DNA. The (apurinic or apyrimidinic) AP site is formed as a result of the DNA damage repair system, which acts as a replication and transcription stopping group (83).The GC content of DNA, which is primarily found in the promoter region, is required for transcriptional factor binding. When 8-oxoG is formed, it is integrated into the genome and prevents the transcriptional machinery from working, as a result, the cell cycle stalled at the point of mutation (84). ROS also damages microsatellites, and telomerase and also affects epigenetic processes by manipulating protein binding sites. Other than 8-oxoG, there is also the presence of an unusual oxidant such as 5-hydroxymethyl uracil (5-OHMeUra) or 8,5'-cyclo-2'- deoxyadenosine (cyclo-dA). 5-OHMeUra is involved in methylation pattern abruption, while cyclo-dA causes protein interaction to be hindered, resulting in transcription failure (77).

Conclusion

Diabetes is a metabolic condition that lasts for a long time. T2DM is not caused by a single component; additional factors like obesity, genetic factors (both inheritance and epigenetically), improper nutrition, sleep patterns, and a stagnant lifestyle all play a role. T2DM is directly influenced by mitochondrial function and alterations. Because mitochondria are an oxidation site, various diseases and treatments target them. During the oxidation process, ROS is produced. The disease is caused by an imbalance in the generation of ROS and their elimination by antioxidants. According to recent research, a high amount of fat in the body causes insulin resistance and blood vessel obstruction, which is classified as a cardiovascular disorder and is a common result of T2DM caused by ROS. Renal failure, amputation of the lower extremities, liver dysfunction, and other complications are also possible. Endogenous antioxidant identification and mechanistic information provide us with the knowledge that forms the foundation of a therapeutic approach for preventing and delaying complications. Furthermore, the detection of biomarkers aids in the research and development of target drug design.

Acknowledgement

The JW is gratified to the funding agency viz Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India (5/4/5-10/Diab./20-NCD-III) for this financial grant.

References

1.
Diabetes A, diabetes W, figures F. Facts & figures [Internet]. Idf.org. 2022.
2.
Diabetes [Internet]. WHO int. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes.
3.
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(suppl_1):s37-s42.[crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Daryabor G, Atashzar M, Kabelitz D, Meri S, Kalantar K. The effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on organ metabolism and the immune system. Front Immunol. 2020;11. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Tangvarasittichai S. Oxidative stress, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. World Journal of Diabetes. 2015;6(3):456. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kaneto H, Matsuoka T. Involvement of oxidative stress in suppression of insulin biosynthesis under diabetic conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012;13(12):13680-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Lee JH, Park A, Oh KJ, Lee SC, Kim WK, Bae KH. The role of adipose tissue mitochondria: Regulation of mitochondrial function for the treatment of metabolic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(19):4924. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Rask-Madsen C, King G. Vascular complications of diabetes: Mechanisms of injury and protective factors. Cell Metabolism. 2013;17(1):20-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Westermann B. Review mitochondrial inheritance in yeast. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 2013;1837(7):1039-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Montgomery M, Turner N. Mitochondrial dysfunction and insulin resistance: An update. Endocrine Connections. 2015;4(1):R1-R15. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Thrash JC, Boyd A, Huggett MJ, Grote J, Carini P, Yoder RJ, et al. Phylogenomic evidence for a common ancestor of mitochondria and the SAR11 clade. Scientific Reports. 2011;1(1):01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Roger A, Muñoz-Gómez S, Kamikawa R. The origin and diversification of mitochondria. Current Biology. 2017;27(21): R1177-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Rong Z, Tu P, Xu P, Sun Y, Yu F, Tu N, et al. The mitochondrial response to DNA damage. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:669379. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Formosa L, Ryan M. Mitochondrial OXPHOS complex assembly lines. Nature Cell Biology. 2018;20(5):511-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Nissanka N, Moraes C. Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in disease and targeted nuclease-based therapeutic approaches. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(3):e49612. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
St. John J, Facucho-Oliveira J, Jiang Y, Kelly R, Salah R. Mitochondrial DNA transmission, replication and inheritance: A journey from the gamete through the embryo and into offspring and embryonic stem cells. Human Reproduction Update. 2010;16(5):488-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Stroud D, Surgenor E, Formosa L, Reljic B, Frazier A, Dibley M, et al. Accessory subunits are integral for assembly and function of human mitochondrial complex I. Nature. 2016;538(7623):123-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Baysal B, Rubinstein W, Taschner P. Phenotypic dichotomy in mitochondrial complex II genetic disorders. J Mol Med. 2001;79(9):495-03. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Gilkerson R. The little big genome the organisation of mitochondrial DNA. Front Biosci. 2017;22(4):710-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Westermann B. Bioenergetic role of mitochondrial fusion and fission. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 2012;1817(10):1833-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Boguszewska K, Szewczuk M, Kaz´ mierczak-Baran´ ska J, Karwowski B. The similarities between human mitochondria and bacteria in the context of structure, genome, and base excision repair system. Molecules. 2020;25(12):2857. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Rovira-Llopis S, Bañuls C, Diaz-Morales N, Hernandez-Mijares A, Rocha M, Victor V, et al. Mitochondrial dynamics in type 2 diabetes: Pathophysiological implications. Redox Biology. 2017;11:637-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Bhatti J, Bhatti G, Reddy P. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in metabolic disorders— A step towards mitochondria based therapeutic strategies. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)- Molecular Basis of Disease. 2017;1863(5):1066-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Westermann B. Molecular machinery of mitochondrial fusion and fission. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(20):13501-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Brown W, George M, Wilson A. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1979;76(4):1967-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Burgstaller JP, Kolbe T, Havlicek V, Hembach S, Poulton J, Piálek J, et al. Largescale genetic analysis reveals mammalian mtDNA heteroplasmy dynamics and variance increase through lifetimes and generations. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):01-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Chomyn A, Meola G, Bresolin N, Lai S, Scarlato G, Attardi G, et al. In-vitro genetic transfer of protein synthesis and respiration defects to mitochondrial DNA-less cells with myopathy-patient mitochondria. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1991;11(4):2236-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Hayashi J, Ohta S, Kikuchi A, Takemitsu M, Goto Y, Nonaka I. Introduction of disease-related mitochondrial DNA deletions into HeLa cells lacking mitochondrial DNA results in mitochondrial dysfunction. Proc Acad Natl Sci. 1991;88(23):10614-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Maassen J, Janssen G, Hart L. Molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial diabetes (MIDD). Annals of Medicine. 2005;37(3):213-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Nissanka N, Minczuk M, Moraes C. Mechanisms of mitochondrial DNA deletion formation. Trends in Genetics. 2019;35(3):235-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Ding Y, Zhang S, Guo Q, Zheng H. Mitochondrial diabetes is associated with tRNALeu(UUR) A3243G and ND6 T14502C mutations. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy. 2022;15:1687-01. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Robinson K, Terrazas S, Giordano-Mooga S, Xavier N. The role of heteroplasmy in the diagnosis and management of maternally inherited diabetes and deafness. Endocrine Practice. 2020;26(2):241-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Chen T, He J, Huang Y, Zhao W. The generation of mitochondrial DNA largescale deletions in human cells. J Hum Genet. 2011;56(10):689-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Lephart E. Equol’s anti-aging effects protect against environmental assaults by increasing skin antioxidant defense and ECM proteins while decreasing oxidative stress and inflammation. Cosmetics. 2018;5(1):16. [crossref]
35.
Sfeir A, Symington L. Microhomology-Mediated end joining: A back-up survival mechanism or dedicated pathway? Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40(11):701-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Fontana G, Gahlon H. Mechanisms of replication and repair in mitochondrial DNA deletion formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(20):11244-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Krishnan K, Reeve A, Samuels D, Chinnery P, Blackwood J, Taylor R, et al. What causes mitochondrial DNA deletions in human cells? Nat Genet. 2008;40(3):275-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Boldinova EO, Khairullin RF, Makarova AV, Zharkov DO. Isoforms of base excision repair enzymes produced by alternative splicing. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3279. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Wallace S. Base excision repair: A critical player in many games. DNA Repair. 2014;19:14-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Vartanian V, Lowell B, Minko I, Wood T, Ceci J, George S, et al. The metabolic syndrome results from a knockout of the NEIL1 DNA glycosylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(6):1864-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Hamanaka R, Chandel N. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species regulate cellular signalling and dictate biological outcomes. Trends Biochem Sci. 2010;35(9):505-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Sharifi-Rad M, Anil Kumar NV, Zucca P, Varoni EM, Dini L, Panzarini E, et al. Lifestyle, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: Back and forth in the pathophysiology of chronic diseases. Front Physiol. 2020;11:694. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Starkov A. The role of mitochondria in reactive oxygen species metabolism and signaling. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1147(1):37-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
44.
Banerjee M, Vats P. Reactive metabolites and antioxidant gene polymorphisms in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Redox Biol. 2014;2:170-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
45.
Lacolley P, Regnault V, Segers P, Laurent S. Vascular smooth muscle cells and arterial stiffening: Relevance in development, aging, and disease. Physiol Rev. 2017;97(4):1555-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
Leyane T, Jere S, Houreld N. Oxidative stress in ageing and chronic degenerative pathologies: Molecular mechanisms involved in counteracting oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(13):7273. [crossref] [PubMed]
47.
Vona R, Gambardella L, Cittadini C, Straface E, Pietraforte D. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in metabolic syndrome and associated diseases. Oxid Med Cellular Longevity. 2019;2019:01-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
48.
Lönn M, Dennis J, Stocker R. Actions of “antioxidants” in the protection against atherosclerosis. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2012;53(4):863-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
49.
Vera-Ramirez L, Ramirez-Tortosa M, Perez-Lopez P, Granados-Principal S, Battino M, Quiles J. Long-term effects of systemic cancer treatment on DNA oxidative damage: The potential for targeted therapies. Cancer Letters. 2012;327(1-2):134-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
50.
Cui H, Kong Y, Zhang H. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and aging. Journal of Signal Transduction. 2012;2012:01-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Prasun P. Mitochondrial dysfunction in metabolic syndrome. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)- Molecular Basis of Disease. 2020;1866(10):165838. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Ma Z, Zhao Z, Turk J. Mitochondrial dysfunction and β-cell failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Experimental Diabetes Research. 2012;2012:01-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
53.
Chen Y, Zweier J. Cardiac mitochondria and reactive oxygen species generation. Cir Res. 2014;114(3):524-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
54.
Góth L, Rass P, Páy A. Catalase enzyme mutations and their association with diseases. Molecular Diagnosis. 2004;8(3):141-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
55.
Nandi A, Yan L, Jana C, Das N. Role of catalase in oxidative stress- and ageassociated degenerative diseases. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2019;2019:01-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
56.
Dos Santos K, Canani L, Gross J, Tschiedel B, Souto K, Roisenberg I, et al. The Catalase–262C/T promoter polymorphism and diabetic complications in caucasians with type 2 diabetes. Disease Markers. 2006;22(5-6):355-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
57.
Ye G, Metreveli N, Donthi R, Xia S, Xu M, Carlson E, et al. Catalase protects cardiomyocyte function in models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53(5):1336-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
58.
Hahn A, Zuryn S. The cellular mitochondrial genome landscape in disease. Trends in Cell Biology. 2019;29(3):227-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
59.
Ritter O, Jelenik T, Roden M. Lipid-mediated muscle insulin resistance: Different fat, different pathways? Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2015;93(8):831-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
60.
Singh A, Kukreti R, Saso L, Kukreti S. Mechanistic insight into oxidative stressTriggered signaling pathways and type 2 diabetes. Molecules. 2022;27(3):950. [crossref] [PubMed]
61.
Giacco, F, Brownlee M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107:1058-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
62.
Hotta N. Is there a place for inhibition of transforming growth factor-β and the polyol pathway in therapy for diabetic retinopathy? J Diabetes Investig. 2010;1(4):134-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
63.
Patel D, Prasad S, Kumar R, Hemalatha S. Cataract: A major secondary complication of diabetes, its epidemiology and an overview on major medicinal plants screened for anticataract activity. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2011;1(4):323-29. [crossref]
64.
Rosen E, Spiegelman B. Adipocytes as regulators of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Nature. 2006;444(7121):847-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
65.
Nicholls D. Stoicheiometries of proton translocation by mitochondria. Biochem Soc Trans. 1977;5(1):200-03. [crossref] [PubMed]
66.
Orava J, Nuutila P, Lidell M, Oikonen V, Noponen T, Viljanen T, et al. Different metabolic responses of human brown adipose tissue to activation by cold and insulin. Cell Metabolism. 2011;14(2):272-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
67.
Kotronen A, Seppälä-Lindroos A, Bergholm R, Yki-Järvinen H. Tissue specificity of insulin resistance in humans: Fat in the liver rather than muscle is associated with features of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetologia. 2007;51(1):130-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
68.
Volpe C, Villar-Delfino P, dos Anjos P, Nogueira-Machado J. Cellular death, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and diabetic complications. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):119. [crossref] [PubMed]
69.
Franke T, Kaplan D, Cantley L, Toker A. Direct regulation of the Akt protooncogene product by phosphatidylinositol-3, 4-bisphosphate. Science. 1997;275(5300):665-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
70.
Manning B, Toker A. AKT/PKB Signaling: Navigating the network. Cell. 2017;169(3):381-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
71.
Yang Q, Vijayakumar A, Kahn B. Metabolites as regulators of insulin sensitivity and metabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(10):654-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
72.
Bigagli E, Lodovici M. Circulating oxidative stress biomarkers in clinical studies on type 2 diabetes and its complications. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:01-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
73.
Mandal M, Varghese A, Gaviraju V, Talwar S, Malini S. Impact of hyperglycaemia on molecular markers of oxidative stress and antioxidants in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical Diabetology. 2019;8(4):215-22. [crossref]
74.
Montuschi P, Barnes P, Roberts L. Isoprostanes: Markers and mediators of oxidative stress. The FASEB Journal. 2004;18(15):1791-1800. [crossref] [PubMed]
75.
Czerska M, Zielin´ ski M, Gromadzin´ ska J. Isoprostanes- A novel major group of oxidative stress markers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;29(2):179-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
76.
Martinez-Moral M, Kannan K. Analysis of 19 urinary biomarkers of oxidative stress, nitrative stress, metabolic disorders, and inflammation using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2022;414(6):2103-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
77.
Urbaniak S, Boguszewska K, Szewczuk M, Kaz´mierczak-Baran´ ska J, Karwowski B. 8-Oxo-7,8-Dihydro-2'-Deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) and 8-Hydroxy-2'- Deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as a potential biomarker for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) development. Molecules. 2020;25(1):202. [crossref] [PubMed]
78.
Tiwari B, Pandey K, Abidi A, Rizvi S. Markers of oxidative stress during diabetes mellitus. J Biomark. 2013;2013:01-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
79.
Kato Y, Dozaki N, Nakamura T, Kitamoto N, Yoshida A, Naito M, et al. Quantification of modified tyrosines in healthy and diabetic human urine using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2009;44(1):67-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
80.
Gryszczyn´ ska B, Formanowicz D, Budzyn´ M, Wanic-Kossowska M, Pawliczak E, Formanowicz P, et al. Advanced oxidation protein products and carbonylated proteins as biomarkers of oxidative stress in selected atherosclerosis-mediated diseases. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
81.
Singh S, Mahajan A, Kaur J. Study of relationship between the protein oxidation markers and adipokines in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Asian J Pharma Clin Res. 2019;204-09. [crossref]
82.
Bhakat K, Mokkapati S, Boldogh I, Hazra T, Mitra S. Acetylation of human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase by p300 and its role in 8-oxoguanine repair in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(5):1654-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
83.
Poetsch A. The genomics of oxidative DNA damage, repair, and resulting mutagenesis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:207-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
84.
Birben E, Sahiner U, Sackesen C, Erzurum S, Kalayci O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ J. 2012;5(1):09-19. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/59325.17165

Date of Submission: Jul 29, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Sep 07, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 06, 2022
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2022

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 01, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 01, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 04, 2022 (9%)

Etymology: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com