Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 119381

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : EC26 - EC29 Full Version

Role of Immunohistochemical Expression of p53 in Intestinal Epithelial Cells to Detect Dysplasia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52194.16001
Neethu Elizabeth George, Sarojini, George Thomas

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India. 2. Retired Professor, Department of Pathology, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Tiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Neethu Elizabeth George,
Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Tiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India.
E-mail: neethuegeorge@hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) has a genetic predisposition, in which patients are more prone to develop colorectal carcinoma. Dysplasia, a precursor of malignancy, can be very difficult to detect based on histopathological features alone. Tumour suppressor gene, p53, is overexpressed in IBD even when there is no histological evidence of dysplasia. Therefore, p53 can be used as a tissue biomarker for routine surveillance to initiate treatment for prevention of carcinoma.

Aim: To identify the diagnostic utility of p53 immunohistochemistry in the detection of dysplasia in patients with IBD.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional diagnostic study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Tiruvalla, Kerala, India, from June 2016 to June 2018. Total 31 cases of intestinal biopsies in patients with chronic bloody diarrhoea were selected for the study. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining using anti p53 antibody was done in all the cases to detect the expressed protein. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Significance of p53 immunostains was done using Fischer’s-exact test.

Results: The age group of patients with IBD ranged from 15-73 years with a bimodal age peak between 20-29 years and 60-69 years. Male predominance was seen among 20 cases while 11 cases were among females. Negative staining for p53 was seen in 28 cases which were negative for dysplasia histopathologically. Only one case which was histopathologically positive for dysplasia and one of the negative cases of dysplasia showed p53 positivity. Another case which was histopathologically positive for dysplasia showed negative staining for p53. Sensitivity of p53 in this study was 50% while the specificity was 96.55%.

Conclusion: The finding of positive p53 expression in dysplasia positive case follows the fact that p53 mutations found in dysplastic mucosa precedes progression to neoplasia. In contrast, positive p53 expression in a case that was negative for dysplasia histopathologically, should be handled cautiously and warrants regular follow-up in order to prevent neoplastic progression. However, diagnosis of dysplasia should not be made in areas of active inflammation as inflammatory changes can lead to regenerative atypia which could result in over interpretation of histological features attributing it to dysplasia.

Keywords

Crohn’s disease, Colorectal cancer, Tumour suppressor gene, Ulcerative colitis

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is chronic condition due to inappropriate immune activation of the mucosa which is predisposed by environmental, immunoregulatory and genetic factors (1). The two constituents of IBD are Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn’s Disease (CD). Ulcerative colitis is limited to the colon. CD can affect any segment of the gastrointestinal tract and is transmural with skip lesions. Both of these diseases present in adolescents and young adults with UC being more frequently seen in females. The incidence of IBD is rising especially in Africa, South America and Asia due to improvement in food storage conditions, decreased contamination of food and change in composition of gut microbiome (2). This phenomenon has been referred to as the “hygiene hypothesis”. It is now believed that altered host interactions with intestinal microbiota, intestinal epithelial dysfunction, aberrant mucosal immune responses, and altered composition of the gut microbiome results in IBD (1). Long standing cases will lead to an increased risk of colorectal cancer which is preceded by dysplasia. Current modality for detection of colorectal dysplasia is extensive biopsy with colonoscopic surveillance to reduce mortality in IBD patients due to colon cancer (2). However, diagnostic difficulties and uncertainties arise leading to a diagnosis of indefinite for dysplasia in some cases (2).

The p53 is known as the “guardian of genome” as it is the key regulator of cell cycle progression, DNA repair, cellular senescence, and apoptosis (1). It is a tumour suppressor gene that is most frequently mutated in most of the human cancers with loss of function mutations being the commonest (1). These mutations are also seen in IBD which predisposes to colorectal cancer. Many studies have shown that overexpression of p53 can help in detecting dysplasia and to predict the progression of colorectal cancer (2),(3),(4). p53 expression can be detected by immunohistochemistry as strong nuclear positivity is associated with neoplasia progression (2). Other methods for detecting p53 mutation is Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA), Complementary DNA (cDNA) sequencing at messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) level (5), high performance liquid chromatography, Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and Western Blot method (6).

The objectives of this study were to detect proportion of IHC expression of p53 in IBD with no dysplastic changes histopathologically, describe staining pattern of p53 in intestinal biopsies of IBD and thereby assess validity of IHC expression of p53 in detecting dysplasia in histopathologically negative specimens of IBD.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional diagnostic study done in the Department of Pathology of Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Tiruvalla, Kerala, India, from June 2016 to June 2018. This study was started after getting approval from the Scientific Review Committee and Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC no.-PIMSRC/E1/388A/55/2016) of Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research centre, Tiruvalla. The study sample included all intestinal biopsies in patients with chronic bloody diarrhoea.

Inclusion criteria: Histologically proven cases of IBD were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Histologically proven cases of colorectal carcinoma and non specific colitis were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Assuming that 97% of intestinal biopsies with histopathological evidence of dysplasia and 15% of histopathologically negative specimens will have p53 overexpression along with a confidence level of 95%, power 80%, α error 5%, β error 10%, sample size was calculated as 30. Consecutive sampling was done until the desired sample size was achieved.

Procedure

Total 31 cases of histopathologically proven IBD from patients with chronic bloody diarrhoea were selected. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks of intestinal biopsies were taken. Sections of 3μ thickness were cut and mounted on poly-L-lysine coated slides. Immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-p53 antibody (Pathnsitu Biotechnologies Pvt., Ltd., mouse monoclonal antibody p53-BP-53-12) (7). Immunostaining for p53 was interpreted as positive or negative (7). Positive staining is defined as moderate to strong nuclear staining in >50% of cells. Negative staining is defined as absent or weak nuclear staining in <50% of cells.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. The significance of p53 immunostain was analysed using Fischer-exact test. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratio for p53 was calculated.

Results

The study sample comprised of 31 histopathologically proven cases of IBD. The age group of patients with IBD ranged from 15-73 years with a bimodal age peak between 20-29 years and 60-69 years. Distribution of cases had a male predominance with 20 cases among males and 11 cases among females. Total 30 cases belonged to the ulcerative colitis group (Table/Fig 1) whereas one case belonged to the CD group (Table/Fig 1). Among the UC cases, seven cases belonged to active phase, four cases in chronic phase and three cases in early phase. Rest of the UC cases could not be categorised into any of the phases due to overlapping features.

Immunohistochemistry for p53

Out of the 31 cases of IBD, two cases stained positive for p53, one of which was histopathologically negative and the other histopathologically positive for dysplasia, both of which belonged to ulcerative colitis (Table/Fig 2), (Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4). Another case which was histopathologically positive for dysplasia showed negative staining for p53 (Table/Fig 5).

The significance of p53 immunostain was analysed using Fischer-exact test and it was found to be non significant (p-value=0.2694). Sensitivity of p53 in this study was 50% while the specificity was 96.55%. Positive predictive value was 50% and negative predictive value of p53 was 96.55%. Diagnostic accuracy was 93.55%. Positive likelihood ratio of p53 was 14.50. Negative likelihood ratio of p53 was 0.52. There was no significant relationship between type of IBD and p53 staining (p-value=0.501) (Table/Fig 1).

Discussion

The IBD carries an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Younger age at diagnosis, greater extent and duration of disease, increased severity of inflammation, family history of colorectal cancer and coexisting primary sclerosing cholangitis are the main risk factors for cancer among patients with IBD (3). The concept of an inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence provides the basis for current guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cancer in this high risk population. To develop an effective strategy for surveillance and prevention, and to understand the limitations of the current approach to prevention, a meticulous understanding of the definition and natural history of dysplasia in IBD, as well as the challenges associated with detection and interpretation of dysplasia, is highly essential (3).

Fricke H et al., stated that p53 tumour suppressor gene mutations are frequent abnormalities in colorectal cancer especially when associated with UC. p53 mutations can lead to the accumulation of p53 gene product in the cell and trigger an antigen driven humoral response against p53 (8). p53 mutations have been observed in non dysplastic IBD colonic mucosa adjacent to dysplastic areas (9).

The present study aimed to identify the diagnostic utility of p53 immunostain in the detection of dysplasia in patients with IBD. A total of 31 histopathologically proven cases of IBD were selected for the study. Immunohistochemistry with anti p53 antibodies was done on all cases.

The IBD usually present in teens and early twenties. Most patients present in the second decade of life. However, a smaller, second peak also occurs in the eighth decade of life (10),(11). The age group of the patients in this study ranged from 15-73 years with a bimodal age peak between 20-29 years and 60-69 years. IBD is more common in females with regard to UC. Crohn’s disease has a male predominance (10),(12). In this study, majority of the patients were males (64.5%) while the rest were females.

Majority of the cases were UC while only one case belonged to CD though consecutive sampling was done. The paucity of CD cases included in the study could be due to the overlap of histological features between CD and tuberculosis. Subsequently, such cases could not be followed-up for confirmation of diagnosis.

Cases belonging to UC were classified as early, acute and chronic phases of the disease based on histological features. Acute phase is characterised by the presence of neutrophils, cryptitis, and crypt abscesses (10),(13),(14). Chronic phase is defined by crypt architectural distortion, mucin depletion, basal plasmacytosis, and paneth cell metaplasia (10),(13),(14),(15). Early phase of UC may not show all these microscopic features but focal basal plasmacytosis can be seen (16).

The p53 expression was absent in 29 cases, which were negative for dysplasia histopathologically (Table/Fig 3) while positive staining for p53 was found in two cases (Table/Fig 4), (Table/Fig 5). Only one case which was histopathologically positive for dysplasia showed p53 positivity. One of the positive cases of dysplasia showed negative staining for p53.

Sensitivity of p53 in this study was 50% while the specificity was 96.55%. This is in concordance with the study done by Kinra SLP et al., where the sensitivity of p53 was 71.4% and specificity was 90.8% (7). A study done by Nathanson JW et al., had eight cases out of fourteen showing p53 positivity. Seven of the eight p53 positive cases had dysplasia (11). One of the cases in the present study which was positive for dysplasia histopathologically showed positive p53 expression.

In a study done by Hamouda HE et al., serum p53 antibodies showed significantly increased levels in UC patients, with significantly higher levels in patients with dysplasia which is associated with overexpression of p53 protein or mutation of p53 gene (17). Similarly, in present study, both the cases positive for p53 expression were patients with a diagnosis of UC.

The finding of positive p53 expression in dysplasia positive case follows the fact that p53 mutations found in dysplastic mucosa precedes progression to neoplasia (18). In contrast, positive p53 expression in a case that was negative for dysplasia histopathologically, should be handled cautiously and warrants regular follow-up in order to prevent neoplastic progression. This is in concordance with the study done by Holzmann K et al., who asserted that higher percentage of p53 mutations in histopathologically negative samples is an indication that these genetic alterations is one of the most important and early one in tumour development (19).

One of the cases showed negative staining for p53 which was positive for dysplasia histopathologically. This could be due to over interpretation of histological features and attributing it to dysplasia rather than the inflammatory changes which can lead to regenerative atypia. As a rule, diagnosis of dysplasia should not be made in areas of active inflammation (14).

However, in the present study, comparison of p53 staining with the status of dysplasia on histopathology did not yield a significant result (p-value >0.05). Many studies have concluded that p53 is an important marker to detect dysplasia with few evaluating it at a genetic level (20),(21),(22). In the present study, IHC expression of p53 was evaluated to detect the expressed protein. This could be a reason for discordance in various studies (5),(6).

Limitation(s)

Limitations of the study include small sample size and short duration of study.

Conclusion

The present study did not show a statistically significant association between p53 staining and various parameters like status of dysplasia on histopathology, gender and type of IBD but it showed low sensitivity and high specificity. Positive p53 staining was observed in a case that was histopathologically positive for dysplasia. This finding states that p53 mutations found in dysplastic mucosa has a risk of progressing to neoplasia. One of the cases which were negative for dysplasia showed positive staining for p53. This indicates that such cases should be handled cautiously and regular follow-up is very essential. New insights can be provided by directing resources to understand the biology of disease and combine them with novel molecular biomarkers to enhance IBD surveillance thus leading to improved clinical outcomes for both clinicians and patients.

Acknowledgement

Authors sincerely thank all the staff of the Department of Pathology and Community Medicine for their cooperation and assistance which enabled us to complete this study. Authors shall remain forever indebted to all patients included in the study, without whose co-operation this study would have been impossible.

References

1.
Kumar V, Abbas AK. AJC. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. Ninth edit. Philadelphia; 2015.
2.
Horvath B, Liu G, Wu X, Lai KK, Shen B, Liu X. Overexpression of p53 predicts colorectal neoplasia risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and mucosa changes indefinite for dysplasia. Gastroenterol Rep. 2015;3(4):344-49. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650973/pdf/gov022.pdf. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Zisman T, Rubin. Colorectal cancer and dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(17):2662-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Vogelstein BB, Hughes MDH, Comprehensive SK. p53: The Most Frequently Altered Gene in Human Cancers. Nat Educ. 2014;3(6):01-07.
5.
Piaskowski S, Zawlik I, Szybka M, Kulczycka-Wojdala D, Stoczynska-Fidelus E, Bienkowski M, et al. Detection of p53 mutations in different cancer types is improved by cdna sequencing. Oncol Lett. 2010;1(4):717-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Liu Y, Bodmer WF. Analysis of P53 mutations and their expression in 56 colorectal cancer cell lines. 2005 [cited 2018 Apr 18]; Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/103/4/976.full.pdf. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Kinra SLP, Col L, Turlapati SP V, Mehta CA, Gen L, Rai R. Study of p53 and bcl-2 Oncoproteins in Ulcerative Colitis with Dysplasia. MJAFI. 2004;61(2):125-29. [crossref]
8.
Fricke H, Urban S, Noehl N, Folwaczny C. Serum p53 antibodies in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1998;42:899-901. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Claessen MMH, Schipper MEI, Oldenburg B, Siersema PD. WNT-pathway activation in IBD-associated colorectal carcinogenesis: Potential biomarkers for colonic surveillance. Cell Oncol. 2010;32(4):303-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Odze RD, Goldblum JR. Odze and Goldblum Surgical Pathology of the GI Tract, Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2009.
11.
Nathanson JW, Yadron NE, Farnan J, Kinnear S, Hart J, Rubin DT. p53 Mutations are Associated with Dysplasia and Progression of Dysplasia in Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(2):474-80. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10620-007-9886-1. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Spenlé C, Lefebvre O, Lacroute J, Méchine-Neuville A, Barreau F, Blottière HM, et al. The laminin response in inflammatory bowel disease: Protection or malignancy? PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e111336. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Kellermann L, Riis LB. A close view on histopathological changes in inflammatory bowel disease, a narrative review. Dig Med Res. 2021;4(3):01-15. [crossref]
14.
Goldblum JR, Lamps LW, McKenney J, Myers JL, editors. Rosai and Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018.
15.
Deroche TC, Xiao SY, Liu X. Histological evaluation in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Rep. 2014;2:178-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Magro F, Langner C, Driessen A, Ensari A, Geboes K, Mantzaris GJ, et al. European consensus on the histopathology of inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7(10):827-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Hamouda HE, Zakaria SS, Ismail SA, Khedr MA, Mayah WW. p53 antibodies, metallothioneins, and oxidative stress markers in chronic ulcerative colitis with dysplasia. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(1719):2417-23. Available from: http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327office. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Hirsch D, Hardt J, Sauer C, Heselmeyer-Hadded K, Witt SH, Kienle P, et al. Molecular characterization of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal carcinomas HHS Public Access. Mod Pathol. 2021;34(6):1153-66. Available from: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Holzmann K, Klump B, Borchard F, Hsieh CJ, Kühn A, Gaco V, et al. Comparative analysis of histology, DNA content, p53 and Ki-ras mutations in colectomy specimens with long-standing ulcerative colitis. Int J Cancer. 1998;76(1):01-06. 3.0.CO;2-4>[crossref]
20.
Lu X, Yu Y, Tan S. p53 expression in patients with ulcerative colitis- associated with dysplasia and carcinoma: A systematic meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017;17(111):01-08. Available from: https://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12876-017-0665-y. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Du L, Kim JJ, Shen J, Chen B, Dai N. KRAS and TP53 mutations in inflammatory bowel disease- associated colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(13):22175-86. Available from: www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Yalchin M, Baker AM, Graham TA, Hart A. Predicting colorectal cancer occurrence in ibd. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(12):01-28. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52194.16001

Date of Submission: Sep 01, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Sep 30, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 13, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 02, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 08, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 11, 2021 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com