Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 20250

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : LC27 - LC31 Full Version

Effectiveness of Multimodular Interventions of Lifestyle Modification on Symptoms of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and Quality of Life among Women- A Pilot Study


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/50394.16030
Pramila D'Souza , Devina E Rodrigues , Raja Gopal Kaipangala , Kunnath Chacko Leena

1. PhD Scholar, Yenepoya Deemed to be University, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Nursing Research, Father Muller College of Nursing, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kanachur Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor and Dean, Yenepoya Nursing College, Yenepoya Deemed to be University, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ms. Pramila D’Souza,
PhD Scholar, Yenepoya Deemed to be University, Deralakatte,
Mangalore-575018, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: dsouzapramila78@gmail.om

Abstract

Introduction: Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder encountered in female. Multimodular interventions of lifestyle modifications emphasise bearable weight loss through dietary, exercise, and behavioural modification. The timely recognition, understanding, and handling of clinical characteristics of this syndrome shall prevent long-term health issues.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of multimodular interventions on symptoms of PCOS and the quality of life of women with PCOS.

Materials and Methods: A pilot study was conducted at Father Muller College of Nursing, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India, between May 2019 to February 2020. The female diagnosed with PCOS were selected through a purposive sampling technique, from two tertiary settings (15 subjects for the intervention group and 15 for the control group). The multimodular interventions (diet, exercises, and behavioural modifications) were provided to the study group. Follow-up was done in the 2nd, 4th and 6th month. The control group subjects continued the regular medical treatment and followed-up at 6th month. The intervention and control group results were compared in the 6th month. The tools used for data collection were baseline variables, PCOS symptom assessment tool, and World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) tool.

Results: The mean age of study participants was 24.26±3.84 years in the intervention, and 24.20±3.54 years in the control group. A significant improvement in the waist-hip ratio, hirsutism acne (p-value <0.001) and quality of life in women with PCOS was observed in the post-test 2 (2nd month), post-test 3 (4th month), and post-test 4 (6th month) in the intervention group (p-value <0.001). A minimal change was noticed in the Body Mass Index (BMI) and Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) scores. The Mann-Whitney test (z values) revealed a significant difference in the symptoms of PCOS of waist-hip ratio (z value=3.328, p-value <0.001) and hirsutism (z-value 2.296, p-value <0.022) between intervention and control group after the 6 months. The pretest mean and standard deviation of physical health domain was 21.00±2.59, psychological health domain 18.13±3.04, social relationship 9.27±1.67, and environmental domain 23.00±3.66. The post-test mean and standard deviation was 24.00±3.05, 22.67±4.03, 12.20±1.74, 28.07±6.71 (p-value <0.001) in physical, psychological, social, and environmental domain, respectively. A statistically significant increase in quality of life observed in the intervention group (p-value <0.001) whereas in the control group there was no change.

Conclusion: The multimodular interventions were found to be effective in reducing the clinical symptoms of PCOS like hirsutism acne and the quality of life steeply improved after 6 months of these interventions in PCOS women.

Keywords

Anthropometric measurements, Diet, Exercises, Obesity, Psychological health

As per the Rotterdam criteria, if one ovary of a woman reveals multiple cysts and is associated with ovulatory dysfunction and excessive secretion of androgens with or without complaints of oligomeneorrhoea it is said to be a polycystic ovary (1). Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disorder characterised by changes in hormonal levels. The common symptoms are menstrual irregularities, anovulation, obesity, acne, hair growth in unwanted areas, alopecia, and a male pattern of baldness (2). Infertility, Type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, hypertension, and gynaecological cancers are found to be long-term complications of PCOS (3).

Worldwide, the prevalence of the syndrome ranges from 2.2%-26%, depending on the choice of diagnostic criteria and population being studied (4). In India limited prevalence studies on PCOS have been conducted. Based on these data, it can be said that the occurrence of PCOS ranges from 3.7%-22.5% (5). A large scale survey conducted in 2020 reported 16.81% incidence of PCOS among women aged 20-29 years (6). Another cross-sectional survey identified approximately 28.5% of females diagnosed as PCOS and 40.5% of females have two or more features of PCOS. An urban community-based study in Mumbai found 22.5% of PCOS (7). One of the studies in south India observed 18% of young adolescent girls are with PCOS (5).

Familial history, stress, unhealthy diet, less or and lack of physical activity and lack of sleep are contributing factors to PCOS (8). Sedentary lifestyle, access to junk food, addiction to social media and the use of complex gadgets for simple daily tasks is highly prevalent among the higher socio-economic population and is also a contributor to the rise of PCOS (9).

Many researchers have pointed out the poor quality of life in women with PCOS. Psychological morbidities like mood swings, anxiety, depression, poor body image, self-esteem, and eating disorders, are frequently observed in PCOS women. These symptoms hamper the work environment, personal and professional life which in turn leads to distress in health-related quality of life (10).

The management of PCOS addresses the associated manifestations and co-morbidities of the syndrome. Weight loss is the first recommended line of management. Healthy diet, regular physical activity, aimed to control excess weight gain, menstrual irregularities, and control of acne and hirsutism (5). The counselling strategies on lifestyle modification encourage women positively to adapt and continue the healthy practice (8). However, in some severe conditions, insulin-sensitising agents and androgen blockers, along with the modified lifestyle are beneficial (9).

In the present study, the Multimodular Intervention (MMI) of lifestyle modification was used. It refers to a comprehensive approach which includes nutritional therapy, physical activity and behavioural modifications. The lifestyle is categorised as moderate (high or moderate levels of physical activity and low prohealthy diet); sedentary (low or no physical activity and low prohealthy diet); healthy (high or moderate levels of physical activity and prohealthy diet) (11).

The American College of Sports Medicine reported that 200-300 minutes of moderate exercise per week facilitates long-term maintenance of weight loss. However, the short sessions of exercises (15-30 minutes), 5 days per week have shown greater effectiveness compared with the traditional structured approach (12). A systematic review highlights that a 3-4 month structured aerobic training programme reduces total testosterone and free androgen index and fasting insulin levels (13). Thomson RL et al., reported that 20 weeks of aerobic-resistance exercises and an energy-restricted diet significantly improved the glucose fasting insulin, testosterone, free androgen and reproductive functions of PCOS women (10). In view of these considerations, the pilot study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of MMI on symptoms of PCOS, and the quality of life of women with PCOS.

Material and Methods

A pilot study was conducted at Father Muller College of Nursing, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India, between March 2019 to December 2019. The study included 30 female diagnosed with PCOS. Ethical clearance was obtained (letter number FMMCTEC/CCM/430/2018), followed by prior permission from the hospital authorities.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated based on the sample size determination table (95% confidence intervals, ±2.5% margin of error) (14). Total 15 subjects for the intervention group and another 15 subjects for the control group were recruited, from the Obstetrics Outpatient Department (OPD) of the two tertiary care settings, which belongs to Father Muller Medical College and Hospital.

Inclusion criteria: The study included women between age group of 18-30 years who have been diagnosed with PCOS by an Obstetrician.

Exclusion criteria: The antenatal women, postpartum women with symptoms of PCOS up to one year, surgical conditions which contraindicate exercises (fractures, cardiac diseases, musculoskeletal disorders), women with medical conditions such as (thyroid impairments, cushing syndrome, and metabolic disorders) and those who were already with similar treatment and already engaged in exercise schedule were excluded from the study.

Parameters

Informed written consent was obtained from the study participants after explaining the client information sheet. A pretest was conducted; baseline proforma was used to collect the baseline characteristics of females, followed by a PCOS assessment tool was administered. This tool consists of the following information:

• Information on menstrual irregularities (15) such as amenorrhoea (absence of menstruation more than 3 months), polymenorrhea (monthly bleeding less than 21 days), oligomeneorrhoea (bleeding occurring more than 35 days apart), regular (bleeding at 28-35 days interval).
• Body Mass Index (BMI) {World Health Organisation (WHO) Asian criteria (12)} was calculated for which weight was measured by using a digital weighing scale to the nearest 0.1 kg, which was calibrated by the Biomedical Department; while height was measured using a standard stadiometer to the nearest 0.5 cm.
• Waist-hip ratio was calculated based on WHO criteria (16).
• Acne was assessed using the Acne Global Grading Scale (17).
• Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) was interpreted based on the American Diabetes Association- normal (<100 mg/dL), prediabetes (100 to 125 mg/dL), and diabetes (126 mg/dL or higher). The venous blood was collected in the laboratory after an overnight 8 hours of fasting (18).
• Hirsutism was assessed by using the modified Ferriman and Gallwey Scale where a score of 8 or more indicates hyperandrogenism (19).

World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF): The quality of life was measured by using WHOQOL- Bref tool. The tool consists of a total of 26 items. Out of it, 24 items are distributed on the four domains such as physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. And one question is about the overall perceived quality of life, another one about the overall perceived satisfaction with health. Item number 21 was reworded as menstrual health from sexual life because the study involves women who have not experienced sexual life (20). The reliability of the Kannada version was 0.56-0.95) (21), internal consistency was measured by using Cronbach’s alpha (0.94).

Procedure

For the women in the interventional group, subjects were counselled for an insulin resistance diet which is composed of healthy fat, high protein, and fewer carbohydrates. The diet menu was prepared with the help of a dietician based on the BMI. Brisk walk for 30 minutes first one month followed by jogging from the month onwards for the same duration was advised. Core muscle exercises, half push-ups, and four types of burpees (beginners, basic, squat thrust, and mountain climber) were demonstrated by the investigator. Subjects practiced for the first month, each exercise repeating for 10 counts; second month onwards same exercises (two sets) were continued with 5 minutes of warm-up and cool down for five days a week, with a total of 20 minutes per day. A video on exercises and the instructional booklet with detailed information on diet and prescribed exercises and a logbook was given to the subjects to document the diet and exercise on daily basis. A compliance chart was maintained by the investigator. The participants who were absent for 2nd post-test were excluded from the study. Reminders on What’s App were sent to the clients as motivation. Follow-up was done every month and post-test was conducted after the 2nd,4th, and 6th months from the pretest.

Regular hospital medical treatment was continued for both intervention and control group. For the control group pretest and after the 6th month post-test was done. A comparison of the measurements was done.

Statistical Analysis

Data were tabulated, analysed, and interpreted using descriptive and inferential statistics like frequency, percentage. Mann-Whitney test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), post-hoc test, and paired Eta square. IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 was used.

Results

Distribution of baseline characteristics and homogeneity of the subjects are presented in (Table/Fig 1). Total 53% of women were aged between 21-25 years in both groups and the mean age was 24.26±3.84 years, 24.20±3.54 years in the intervention and control group, respectively. Out of 15 women in the interventional group, more than 70% of them were qualified above 12th standard in both the groups, above 65% of subjects practiced moderate type of lifestyle, and above 70 % of them did not have a family history of PCOS in the intervention and control group.

Assessment of symptoms of PCOS in various time points are presented in (Table/Fig 2), shows the steady improvement in menstruation pattern, Body Mass Index, (BMI) waist-hip ratio, acne, and FBS scores in the intervention group after 6 months comparing to control group.

The (Table/Fig 3) shows the quality of life of women in each domain is considerably increased (p-value <0.001).

The (Table/Fig 4) shows that the subjects’ perception on QOL and satisfaction with health is improved after the interventions (p-value <0.001).

The (Table/Fig 5) shows the improvement waist hip ratio (p-value <0.003), hirsutism (p-value <0.001), and acne (p-value <0.008) within the group at various time points. A significant difference is noticed between pretest and post-test 3 values of hirsutism (p-value <0.036).

(Table/Fig 6) depicts the significant difference in the waist-hip ratio p-value=0.001 and hirsutism p-value=0.022 after the intervention compared to the control group.

(Table/Fig 7) shows a highly significant difference in all domains of quality of life in the intervention group, while there was no improvement in the control group after 6 months.

(Table/Fig 8) shows a highly significant difference in the perception towards the quality of life and satisfaction with health in the intervention group, whereas the scores of the control group remained stable after six months.

Karl Pearson’s correlation showed a moderately strong positive relationship between BMI and satisfaction with health (r=0. 568, p-value <0.027) and waist-hip ratio (r=0.521, p-value <0.046) in the intervention group.

The statistical test MANOVA showed the association of BMI with menarche (p-value <0.033) and qualification (p-value <0.014) in the intervention group, whereas, in the control group the association was observed with a family history of PCOS (p-value <0.038) and BMI (η2=0.541).

Discussion

Lifestyle reform is forefront in the management of PCOS symptoms. Healthy diet and physical exercise regimes are an excellent rehabilitation in mitigating PCOS signs and related metabolic illnesses. Additionally, these regimes had highlighted positive results in improving holistic health of women with this the disorder.

This study was focussed to reduce the symptoms and improve the quality of life of women with PCOS after administering the MMIs of lifestyle modification. Overall, this study revealed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in reducing PCOS symptomology and quality of life.

The efficacy of MMI was more evident in reducing waist-hip ratio {df(3,42)=5.304, hirsutism df(3,42) =6.853, and acne df(3,42)=4.497, p-value<0.001}, within the intervention group over 6 months. Moreover, 80% of women had menstrual irregularity, 33.3% were prediabetes and only 6.7% of them were with normal BMI before intervention. After 6 months of interventions 80% attained regular menstruation, 13.3% of subjects remained as prediabetes and 66.7% achieved normal BMI compared with control group. These findings were congruent with the trial outcomes conducted by Arentz S et al., (22). They found improvement in the menstrual cycle, BMI and fasting insulin (p-value <0.001). Another study by Jiskoot G et al., supports the finding of the current study (23).

In the present study, the η2 values (0.373 -0.641) in each domain of quality of life showed improved after the 6 months of MMI administration in the intervention group. The p-values (p-value <0.001), denote highly significant influence of MMI on enhancing quality of life comparing to control group. Several research studies have reported that the lifestyle modification will improve the quality of life of women with PCOS (21). Ramya R et al., conducted a hospital-based intervention for 6 months on women suffering from PCOS, used WHOQOL-Bref tool and found increased quality of life in each domain in the post-test (24). Evidences show that the lifestyle modification is the prime need of women with PCOS to improve the physical, clinical, and metabolic parameters and heighten the quality of life (25).

Limitation(s)

Even though exercise had a good effect on the PCOS symptoms and quality of life there was some drawback in the study. The study outcomes were limited to physical, clinical parameters and quality of life of women. Further studies can be done on various pattern of exercises which in moderate intensity will help to control the physical signs, clinical and metabolic parameters of women with PCOS.

Conclusion

The PCOS is one of the reproductive health problems faced by the females. The quality of life is significantly lower in females with PCOS in comparison to healthy women. The lifestyle modification remains as utmost priority in women to sustain good reproductive health. The current study has demonstrated its efficacy on a small sample. Nevertheless, this information can be used for better patient outcomes by clinicians, nurses and paramedical personnel when they encounter the PCOS female.

References

1.
Balaji S, Amadi C, Prasad S, Bala Kasav J, Upadhyay V, Singh AK, et al. Urban rural comparisons of polycystic ovary syndrome burden among adolescent girls in a hospital setting in India. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:158951. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Haq N, Khan Z, Riaz S, Nasim A, Shahwani R, Tahir M. Prevalence and knowledge of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) among female science students of different public Universities of Quetta, Pakistan. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2017;3(6):385-92.
3.
Dos Santos IK, Ashe MC, Cobucci RN, Soares GM, de Oliveira Maranhão TM, Dantas PMS. The effect of exercise as an intervention for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(16):e19644. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Choudhary A, Jain S, Chaudhari P. Prevalence and symptomatology of polycystic ovarian syndrome in Indian women: Is there a rising incidence? Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;6(11):4971-75;4971-76. [crossref]
5.
Ganie MA, Vasudevan V, Wani IA, Baba MS, Arif T, Rashid A. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics & management of polycystic ovary syndrome in India. Indian J Med Res. 2019;150(4):333-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
India: polycystic ovary syndrome issues among women by age group 2020 [Internet]. Statista.com. [cited 2021 Sep 17]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1136572/india-polycystic-ovary-syndrome-issues-among-women-by-age-group/.
7.
Rao M, Broughton KS, LeMieux MJ. Cross-sectional study on the knowledge and prevalence of PCOS at a multiethnic university. Prog Prev Med (NY). 2020;5(2):e0028. [crossref]
8.
Joshi B, Mukherjee S, Patil A, Purandare A, Chauhan S, Vaidya R. A cross-sectional study of polycystic ovarian syndrome among adolescent and young girls in Mumbai, India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18:317-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Vidya R, Bharathi S, Swetha J, Neerajaa J, Madhavica V, Moorthy D, et al., An epidemiological survey: Effect of predisposing factors for PCOS in Indian urban and rural population. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2017;22(4):313-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2017.05.007. [crossref]
10.
Thomson RL, Buckley JD, Lim SS, Noakes M, Clifton PM, Norman RJ, et al. Lifestyle management improves quality of life and depression in overweight and obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5):1812-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Gasior A, Kolarzyk E, Majewska R, Gasior A, Kwiatkowski J, Zaleska I. Diet and physical activity as determinants of lifestyle chosen by women from Southern Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2088. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Moran L. Effects of lifestyle modifi cation in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Reproductive Bio Medicine Online. 2006;12(5):569-78. [crossref]
13.
Shele G, Genkil J, Speelman D. A systematic review of the effects of exercise on hormones in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020;5:35; pp2-24. Doi: 10.3390/jfmk5020035. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Sharma KS. Nursing research and statistics. 2017; 2nd edition: publi Relx India; pp 230-31.
15.
Jacob Annamma. A comprehensive textbook of midwifery and gynaecological Nursing; 2021; 5th edition: Jaypee publication; pp 622-24.
16.
Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio Report of a WHO Expert Consultation Geneva, 8-11 December 2008.
17.
Thappa D, Adityan B, Kumari R. Scoring systems in acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75(3):323-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
American Diabetes Association. 3. Prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes- 2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl. 1):S32-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Ferriman D, Gallwey JD. Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. The J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1961;21(11):1440-47. [crossref]
20.
World Health Organization. WHO QOL User Manual. Programme on Mental Health. Available at: www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/620.pdf (last accessed on June, 2020).
21.
Rose A, Shashidhara YN, Manjula. Quality of life of people with non communicable diseases. NUJHS. 2015;5(3):71-76. [crossref]
22.
Arentz S, Smith CA, Abbott J, Fahey P, Cheema BS, Bensoussan A. Combined lifestyle and herbal medicine in overweight women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): a randomized controlled trial. Phytother Res. 2017;31(9):1330-40. Doi: 10.1002/ptr.5858 [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Jiskoot G, Timman R, Beerthuizen A, Loos DA, Busschbach J, Laven J. Weight Reduction Through a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Lifestyle Intervention in PCOS: The Primary Outcome of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obesity. 2020;28:2134-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Ramya R, Ann SK, Mamatha, K Surya. Quality of life in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: requisite of clinical pharmacist intervention. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2019:12(11):100-05. [crossref]
25.
Nunes DL, Santos D, Cobucci R, Pichini GS, Soares GM, de Oliveira Maranhão. Lifestyle interventions and quality of life for women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Medicine. 2019;98(50):71-79. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/50394.16030

Date of Submission: May 17, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Aug 04, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 24, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 18, 2021
• Manual Googling: Sep 27, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jan 08, 2022 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com