Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 190174

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : NC19 - NC22 Full Version

Analysis of Best Management of Proliferative Sickle Cell Retinopathy in African Population- A Retrospective Analytical Study


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/48520.16044
Francis Kwasi Obeng, Vipan Kumar Vig, Preetam Singh, Rajbir Singh, Yao Ahonon

1. Consultant Vitreoretinal and Ophthalmic Surgeon, Department of Ophthalmology, 37 Military Hospital, Accra, Ghana. 2. Consultant Vitreoretinal and Ophthalmic Surgeon, Department of Ophthalmology, Sadar Bagadur, Dr. Sohan Singh Eye Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 3. Consultant Vitreoretinal and Ophthalmic Surgeon, Department of Ophthalmology, Sadar Bagadur, Dr. Sohan Singh Eye Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 4. Consultant Vitreoretinal and Ophthalmic Surgeon, Department of Ophthalmology, Sadar Bagadur, Dr. Sohan Singh Eye Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 5. Biostatistician, Department of Public Health, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Francis Kwasi Obeng,
Consultant Vitreoretinal and Ophthalmic Surgeon, Department of Ophthalmology,
37 Military Hospital, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana.
E-mail: fobeng37@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Visual impairment in Proliferative Sickle Cell Retinopathy (PSCR) starts with neovascularisation. Treatment armamentaria including diathermy, retinopexy, Autoinfarction (AI), surgical procedures and intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Injections Monotherapy (AEGFM) have been applied. Some outcomes led to blindness but data on how effective AEGFM is in treating PSCR is lacking in several publications.

Aim: To assess outcome and complication profile of large series of patients who underwent AEGFM after being diagnosed with PSCR.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analytical study conducted in October 2020 on records of 40 patients who underwent AEGFM and other treatment on account of PSCR at Department of Ophthalmology, 37 Military Hospital, Accra, Ghana. The records were reviewed retrospectively for visual outcomes and complications. Patients’ demographic data, indications of treatment, best corrected preoperative and postoperative visual acuities, complications of surgery and length of follow-up were collected and analysed using chi-square and paired t-tests.

Results: A total of 80 eyes of 40 patients (36 males and four females) were identified. Mean age during AEGFM (72 eyes) and vitreoretinal surgery (eight eyes) was 31.7±9.3 years (range 26- 56 years) with mean follow-up period of 6±1 years (range 5-7 years). A total of 70 (87.5%), 2 (2.5%) and 8 eyes (10%) had improvement, maintenance and worsening of final visual acuities, respectively. A total of 8 (16%) eyes developed postoperative complications from retinal surgeries with Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR) being the most common. Forty (50%) eyes with old retinal Laser Photocoagulation (LP) scars reported with fresh elevated Sea Fans (SF) and Vitreous Haemorrhage (VH). LP is therefore a major source of SF formation and VH in PSCR.

Conclusion: AEGFM is better treatment than other available modalities in management of undetached PSCR.

Keywords

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy, Laser photocoagulation, Retinal neovascularisation, Sea fans, Vitreous haemorrhage

Globally, African continent which is grappling with malaria has recorded highest prevalence and incidence of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) due to which PSCR develops (1). This is so because patients who have traits of SCD get protection against falciparum malaria which is a major cause of death. These traits favour survival of the host and transmission of abnormal haemoglobin (Hb) gene to future generations (2). Left untreated, the natural history of SF formed from Sickel Cell Disease (SCD) may be marked by VH, tractional or rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment (RD) (3), all of which can lead to blindness. In prevention of blindness, several treatment approaches have been applied in the past and present with poor outcomes. Notable amongst them are diathermy, retinopexy, Autoinfarction (AI) and surgical procedures. A paradigm shift in management of PSCR is emerging in form AEGFM.

Treatment of SF with diathermy was relegated to the background several decades ago because it caused a lot of uveitides and anterior segment ischaemia (4). LP, either xenon arc or argon, has been used to destroy neovascular tissue for several decades (5),(6). However, it has several limitations and complications. Retinal haemorrhage, VH, cataract, hyphaema and corneal scars act as limitations to successful LP. Complication profile of LP are classified into intraocular and extraocular. Whereas the former comprises retinal haemorrhage, VH (6), choroidal ischaemia (7), choroidovitreal neovascularisation (6),(8), choroidal rupture, choroidal haemorrhage, rupture of Bruch’s membrane, retinal scars, enlarged retinal scars (9), reduced macular sensitivity, optic disc atrophy and recurrence of retinal new vessels, the latter entails reduction in visual field, poor sight, inadequate dark adaptation, nyctalopia and sometimes transient accommodative paraesis.

The advantage cryopexy has over LP is that it can be used in small pupils and opaque media to achieve same outcome as LP. However, it is not widely used because it is limited to only anterior retina. Its major complications are retinal tears and Tractional Retinal Detachment (TRD) (10). The natural process through which neovascular complex regresses without any intervention is known as AI (11). It, therefore, occludes SF more elegantly than retinopexy reflecting clinical improvement as VH and possible RD are rendered less likely. However, had AI been reliable enough a mechanism, then there would have been neither the need to propose any treatment for PSCR nor its classification up to stage V characterised by RD. Additionally, no patient would ever be blind from PSCR. According to Serjeant, AI is more common in genotype SS (12), a group which is least prone to PSCR rendering the whole assertion paradoxical and scientifically negligible.

The major technical problem associated with Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) is manipulation of already ischaemic and fragile extreme retinal periphery, where iatrogenic breaks, cataract or vitreous skirt may occur (13). Hyphaema, residual VH and secondary glaucoma are complications that are difficult to manage (14). Use of Scleral Buckle (SB) to treat RD is challenging because there is great chance that these patients will develop anterior segment ischemia that may progress to phthisis bulbi ultimately (15). What makes surgery a more cumbersome method is, that, whereas the patient might need transfusion of healthy red cells to replace the sickled erythrocytes, the surgeon should avoid direct-acting sympathomimetics and post-synaptic alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists like phenylephrine in dilating the pupils because they can enhance sickling through vasoconstriction (16),(17). Cold temperature in theatre for many hours of surgery can also trigger sickling and complicate the procedure (16),(17).

To date, a few published case series have shown favourable results when AEGFM is utilised in management of undetached PSCR (18),(19). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time such new treatment is being assessed in Africans. The purpose of the study was to analyse outcome and complication profile of patients in Sub-Sahara Africa who underwent AEGFM after being diagnosed with PSCR.

Material and Methods

This is an analytical retrospective study carried out in October 2020 to review medical records of 74 patients (148 eyes) who underwent AEGFM from September 2013 to September 2020 and other forms of retinal treatment after being diagnosed with PSCR at Department of Ophthalmology, 37 Military Hospital, Accra, Ghana.

These patients had a minimum follow-up of 5 years. One experienced Consultant Vitreoretinal and Ophthalmic Surgeon performed all the procedures. Institutional Ethical Approval was acquired for this research and in a broader measure, tenets of Declaration of Helsinki were applied to preserve human rights of participants. Records of those patients who were examined and diagnosed at the retina clinic of 37 Military Hospital in Accra, Ghana from September 2013 to September 2020 were collected.

Inclusion criteria: Patients included in the study were those who were examined and diagnosed at the retina clinic of 37 Military Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Inclusion criteria for AEGFM were eyes with PSCR without TRD and dense VH. Inclusion criteria for surgery were eyes with TRD and dense VH.

Exclusion criteria: Out of 74 patients whose medical records were reviewed, 34 were excluded from the study because they were either followed up for less than five years or lost to follow-up or did not meet criteria for AEGFM. Exclusion criteria for AEGFM were eyes with retinal tractional bands, RD, painful red eye, conjunctivitis and blind eye.

Some of the patients had been referred from other Sub-Saharan African countries. In addition to general demographic data, information on baseline preoperative visual acuity, indication for procedure, postoperative complications, latest Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and indication for any subsequent surgical procedures was collected and analysed.

Procedure

The AEGFM was administered by one Consultant Vitreoretinal and Ophthalmic Surgeon (FKO) under sterile and aseptic conditions in an operation theatre using same procedures in all patients. About 10% povidone iodine was used to clean skin around the eyelids with gauze. Topical anaesthetic drops were administered, the injection site washed with 5% povidone iodine, a lid speculum used, a 30-gauge needle inserted through pars plana and bevacizumab (Avastin, 1.25 mg in 0.05 mL) injected into the vitreous. Other anti-VEGFs (ranibizumab and aflibercept) were used when bevacizumab became scarce. A cotton-tipped applicator was used to apply mild pressure for 15 seconds at the site of injection immediately after needle withdrawal. The eye was then patched after instillation of one drop of 5% povidone iodine onto the ocular surface. Patches were removed two hours after the procedure and patients, reviewed one day and one week after injection. A treat and extend approach was used in all patients with total number of injections in an eye ranging from 3 to 6 depending on severity of PSCR (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2) on first examination.

LP technique used in the study consisted of sectorial treatment of SF with argon. Retinal surgeries were performed in patients who developed RD. It consisted of three port PPV, posterior vitreous detachment induction, membrane segmentation, membrane delamination, fluid air exchange, endolaser, 6 o’clock iridectomy, silicone oil injection into the vitreous cavity and anterior retinal cryotherapy under sterile and aseptic conditions. Snellen BCVA was converted into logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units in order to get better statistical analysis. Patients whose visual acuities were hand movement were assigned equivalence of 1.7 logMAR units.

statistical Analysis

Paired t-test was used for normally distributed variables. All tests were considered statistically significant, if, p-value was 0.05 or less. Chi-square test and paired t-test with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and Graphpad software were used, respectively.

Results

Although all patients were sickling positive with genotype SC, only 8 (20%) knew their sickling and genotype status. A total of 80 eyes of 40 patients (36 males and four females) were identified. Mean age during AEGFM (72 eyes) and vitreoretinal surgery (eight eyes) was 31.7±9.3 years (range 26-56 years), with mean follow-up period of 6±1 years (range 5-7 years).

BCVA did not change in patients who had initial good BCVA, but individuals with VH without RD and initial poor visual acuities had remarkable improvement in their sight after AEGFM. Mean pretreatment BCVA was 0.57±0.50 logMAR units which depended on stage and severity of disease. The mean difference between final post and pretreatment visual acuity was 0.50±1.0 logMAR units which was statistically significant (p <0.005).

(Table/Fig 3) summarises visual outcomes of different modalities of treatment offered. In all 87.5% of eyes had improvement, 2.5% maintenance and 10% worsening of final post-treatment visual acuities compared to pretreatment measurement.

Based on results in (Table/Fig 4), there was statistically significant difference in the means of pre and post-treatment visual acuities; thus an improvement in the AEGFM visual acuity.

The underlying vitreoretinal diseases which led to AEGFM included peripheral SF neovascularisation without retinal or VH (n=30 eyes; 37.5%) and VH with sector LP scars (n=40 eyes; 50%). Eight eyes (10%) were only observed without any therapeutic intervention because their visual acuities were nil perception of light each on account of PVR secondary to previously failed Vitreoretinal Surgery (VRS) performed by other surgeons due to combined tractional and rhegmatogenous RD. The remaining 2 eyes (2.5%) from two patients had not had any form of ophthalmic examination. They had gone phthisical when examined for the first time.

In all 30 of 80 eyes whose initial treatments was AEGFM did not develop any complication (Table/Fig 5). The most common complication was recurrent retinal new vessels formation from previous retinal LP. All the 40 eyes whose previous treatment was retinal LP later developed recurrent new vessels. This complication was corrected with AEGFM. The two eyes which went through autoinfarction (AI) became totally blind. Out of eight eyes which had VRS, all of them had one form of complication or the other, resulting in blindness at last follow-up visit. Development of cataract was not ascribable to PSCR, since its ischaemia protects crystalline lens against cataractogenesis. Cataract formation was due to VRS.

Discussion

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Injections Monotherapy is emerging as the best modality of treatment in management of undetached PSCR although it has not gained popularity due to little research on this novel therapy. In the present study, 30 eyes with PSCR were originally and successfully treated with AEGFM. Additionally, all 40 eyes which had retinal LP as original treatment developed complications which were eventually managed with AEGFM as shown (Table/Fig 5) above. On the average, the present study revealed that an eye with undetached PSCR needed at least three treatment sessions using treat and extend approach. Scarcity of bevacizumab led to use of ranibizumab in five eyes and aflibercept in six eyes all of which gave good outcomes. After third injection with bevacizumab, an eye did not respond to treatment. Subsequently, treatment was changed to aflibercept and the new vessels regressed. Similarly, two eyes which were started on aflibercept did not respond well to treatment. After bevacizumab was initiated in their management, those eyes responded to treatment. It has, therefore, not been established in the study that one anti-VEGF is superior to another.

Siqueira RC et al., published an article in which bevacizumab was used in regression of SF together with LP (18). This method was used because the patient refused to undergo PPV. Another article was published in which bevacizumab monotherapy was used in treatment of PSCR (19). They treated five eyes, four of which had VH. The fifth eye had SF without VH. Two of the eyes had recurrent VH within 13 years of follow-up. The researchers, however, were sceptical about frequency and interval of treatment (19). In all cases, there have not been reported complications with use of bevacizumab except one case in which Babalola OE observed hyphaema in their patient after treatment (20). Albeit some researchers used bevacizumab, Mitropoulos PG et al., used ranibizumab to achieve same treatment efficacy (21). Their patients had regression of VH and SF without complications (21).

Use of AEGFM in treatment of undetached PSCR is based on pathogenesis of the disease. Ischaemia induced new retinal vessel formation is regulated by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and their Receptors (VEGFRs) which include Placental Growth Factor (PlGF), angiopoietin and Tie receptors, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-B (PDGF-B), Stromal-Derived Factor-1 (SDF-1), Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 (HIF-1) and signals from extracellular matrix (22). Increased VEGF transcription and upregulation of angiogenesis re-establishes oxygen and nutrition supply to tissues affected by hypoxia (23). VEGF also contributes to inflammatory process by inducing expression of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) to enhance leukocyte recruitment and endothelial cell adhesion leading to blood retinal barrier breakdown and new vessel formation (24). Anti-VEGF is therefore, used to inhibit the release and functions of VEGF.

Ocular complications associated with anti-VEGF use may include ablation of choriocapillaris and vision loss (25), worsening of Geographic Atrophy (GA) (26) and accelerated photoreceptor apoptosis (27). Anti-VEGF may have systemic complications which may result from minute escape of the substance from vitreous to systemic circulation. These may include vascular hyperpermeability, arterial hypertension, thromboembolic events, left ventricular dilatation and contractile dysfunction as well as heart failure (28),(29),(30). All these complications are found in non Africans. None of the patients in the present study developed any of these ocular or systemic complications. Melanin, therefore, may have a protective role against side effects from anti-VEGF.

A Cochrane review showed poor results when 341 eyes with PSCR were managed with LP (31). According to Rednam KR et al., 29 participants who received LP developed fresh SF after nine years of follow-up (32). A study from Brazil showed initial regression of SF with LP, a success which was marred by development of new SF after several months of follow-up (33),(34). Interestingly, some authors of studies which had initial success with LP did not report on complications of same, a bias which should be analysed. Additionally, a study published by Jampol LM and Goldberg MF, established that even after a successful LP, retinal tears and rhegmatogenous RD may occur (35).

A research which associated age and genotype conducted in Jamaica revealed that the mean age of patients who had AI was 39.2 in genotype SS and 35.2 years genotype SC (36). Whereas AI occurs less frequently in patients who are younger than 40 years, it is more common in patients who are older than age 40 years especially if they have genotype SS (37). AI occurs on the average two years after appearance of SF in as many as 60% of patients (11),(36). A research published by Condon PI and Serjeant GR, revealed 12% of AI cases went blind (36). Another study conducted by Moriarty BJ et al., revealed 10% of untreated eyes lost visual acuity over ten years (38). In the present study, two eyes went phthisical from AI because the patients in question did not have access to a retinal specialist. If it were reliable, no literature would have extended pathogenesis of PSCR beyond stage 3. It can, therefore, categorically be stated from evidences gathered above that AI is not reliable and that interventional treatment is important in management of PSCR.

Pars Plana Vitrectomy may be required when SF lead to very dense VH and or RD (39). According to Chen RW et al., surgical complications from PSCR can happen in 50% of patients (40). Another study conducted by McKinney CM et al., revealed that complications of PSCR may regress and reappear even after successful PPV (41). In the present study, all eight eyes which had PPV ended up with nil perception of light as visual acuity at last follow-up.

Limitation(s)

The retrospective nature, single-centre focus, variable follow-up lengths, and the fact that only one Consultant Vitreoretinal and Ophthalmic Surgeon performed all the procedures limited the study.

Conclusion

There have been several treatment modalities in management of undetached PSCR whose natural history is blindness in the Sub-Sahara African geographical area. Being the cheapest method of treatment, LP is commonly used but it is associated with several complications many of which are causes of blindness. The present research has revealed that when undetached, PSCR responds very well to AEGFM which is a novel treatment and at the same time leaves no complications in management of the disease. Management with AEGFM can be (pro re nata) PRN or treat and extend depending on each patient and their clinical presentation. One major difficulty is cost involved, but it is relatively very cheap compared to blindness from other methods of management. Measures should be taken to prevent RD because the present research has proved that all retinae which were detached and had retinal surgeries became blind.

References

1.
Fox PD, Dunn DT, Morris JS, Serjeant GR. Risk factors for proliferative sickle retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74(3):172-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Taylor SM, Parobek CM, Fairhurst RM. Haemoglobinopathies and the clinical epidemiology of malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(6):457-68. [crossref]
3.
Moriarty BJ, Acheson RW, Condon PI, Serjeant GR. Patterns of visual loss in untreated sickle cell retinopathy. Eye (Lond). 1988;2 (pt 3):330-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Condon PI, Serjeant GR. Photocoagulation and diathermy in the treatment of proliferative sickle retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974;58(7):650-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Castro O. Management of sickle cell disease: Recent advances and controversies. Br J Haematol. 1999;107(1):02-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Rodrigues M, Kashiwabuchi F, Deshpande M. Expression pattern of HIF-1 and VEGF supports circumferential application of scatter laser for proliferative sickle retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(15):6739-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Goldbaum MH, Galinos SO, Apple DJ, Asdourian GK, Nagpal K, Jampol L, et al. Acute choroidal ischemia as a complication of photocoagulation. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1976;94(6):1025-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Galinos SO, Asdourian GK, Woolf MB, Goldberg MF, Busse BJ. Choroido-vitreal neovascularisation after argon laser photocoagulation. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1975;93:524-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Schatz H, Madeira D, McDonald HR, Johnson RN. Progressive enlargement of laser scars following grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(11):1549-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Goldbaum MH, Fletcher RC, Jampol LM, Goldberg MF. Cryotherapy of proliferative sickle retinopathy, II: Triple freeze-thaw cycle. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979;63(2): 97-101. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Lutty GA et al. Sickle cell retinopathy and hemoglobinopathies. In: Joussem AM et al. Retinal Vascular Diseases. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007. [crossref]
12.
Lemaire C, Lamarre Y, Lemonne N, Waltz X, Chahed S, Cabot F et. al. Severe proliferative retinopathy is associated with blood hyperviscosity in sickle cell hemoglobin-C disease but not in sickle cell anemia; Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2013;55(2):205-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Jampol LM, Green JL Jr, Goldberg MF, Peyman GA. An update on vitrectomy surgery and retinal detachment repair in sickle cell disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100(4):591-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Goldberg MF. The diagnosis and treatment of secondary glaucoma after hyphema in sickle cell patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;87(1):43-49. [crossref]
15.
Ryan SJ, Goldberg MF. Anterior segment ischemia following scleral buckling in sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971;72(1):35-50. [crossref]
16.
Koshy M, Weiner SJ, Miller ST, Sleeper LA, Vichinsky E, Brown AK, et al. Surgey and anesthesia in sickle cell disease. Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Diseases. Blood. 1985;86(10):3676-84 [crossref]
17.
de Montalembert M. Management of sickle cell disease. BMJ. 2008;337:a1397. Review. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Siqueira, RC, Costa, RA, Scott, IU, Cintra, LP, Jorge, R. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) injection associated with regression of retinal neovascularisation caused by sickle cell retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84(6):834-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Cai CX, Linz MO, Scott AW Intravitreal bevacizumab for proliferative sickle retinopathy: A case series. Journal of Vitreo Retinal Diseases. 2018;2(1):32-38. [crossref]
20.
Babalola OE. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) associated with secondary hyphaema in a case of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy. BMJ Case Rep. 2010;2010. pii: bcr11.2009.2441.Intravitreal ranibizumab for stage IV proliferative sickle cell reti-nopathy: A first case report. Case reports in Ophthalmological Medicine 2014:682583. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Mitropoulos PG, Chatziralli IP, Parikakis EA, Peponis VG, Amariotakis GA, Moschos MM. Intravitreal ranibizumab for stage IV proliferative sickle cell reti-nopathy: A first case report. Case reports in Ophthalmological Medicine. 2014;2014:682583. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Campochiaro PA. Molecular pathogenesis of retinal and choroidal vascular diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;49:67-81. Doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.06.002. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Kim M, Lee C, Payne R, Yue BYJT, Chang JH, Ying H. Angiogenesis in glaucoma filtration surgery and neovascular glaucoma: A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(6):524-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Kaur C, Foulds WS, Ling EA. Hypoxia-ischemia and retinal ganglion cell damage. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2(4):879-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Kurihara T, Westenskow PD, Bravo S, Aguilar E, Friedlander M. Targeted deletion of Vegfa in adult mice induces vision loss. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(11):4213-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Gemenetzi M, Lotery AJ, Patel PJ. Risk of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. Eye. 2016;31(1):01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Saint-Geniez M, Kurihara T, Sekiyama E, Maldonado AE, D'Amore PA. An essential role for RPE-derived soluble VEGF in the maintenance of the choriocapillaris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(44):18751-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Chen ZI, Ai DI. Cardiotoxicity associated with targeted cancer therapies. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016;4(5):675-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Izumiya Y, Shiojima I, Sato K, Sawyer DB, Colucci WS, Walsh K. Vascular endothelial growth factor blockade promotes the transition from compensatory cardiac hypertrophy to failure in response to pressure overload. Hypertension. 2006;47(5):887-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Choueiri TK, Mayer EL, Je Y, Rosenberg JE, Nguyen PL, Azzi GR, et al. Congestive heart failure risk in patients with breast cancer treated with bevacizumab. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):632-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Myint KT, Sahoo S, Thein AW, Dhibi HA, Schellini S, Malik R et. al. Laser therapy for retinopathy in sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(10):CD010790. doi.org/10.1102/14651858.CD010790. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Rednam KR, Jampol LM, Goldberg MF. Scatter retinal pho-to coagulation for proliferative sickle cell retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93:594-99. [crossref]
33.
Farber MD, Jampol LM, Fox P, Moriarty BJ, Acheson RW, Rabb MF, et al. A randomized clinical trial of scatter photocoagulation of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(3):363-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Jampol LM, Condon P, Farber M, Rabb M, Ford S, Serjeant G. A randomized clinical trial of feeder vessel photocoagulation of proliferative sickle cellretinopathy. I. Preliminary results. Ophthalmology. 1983;90(5):540-45. [crossref]
35.
Jampol LM, Goldberg MF. Retinal breaks after photocoagulation of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(4):676-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Condon PI, Serjeant GR. Behaviour of untreated proliferative sickle retinopathy. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1980;64(6):404-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Fox PD, Vessey SJ, Forshaw ML, Serjeant GR. Influence of genotype on the natural history of untreated proliferative sickle retinopathy- an angiographic study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75(4):229-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Moriarty BJ, Acheson RW, Condon PI, Serjeant GR. Patterns of visual loss in untreated sickle cell retinopathy. Eye (Lond) 1988;2(Pt 3):330-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Williamson TH, Rajput R, Laidlaw DA, Mokete B. Vitreoretinal management of the complications of sickle cell retinopathy by observation or pars plana vitrectomy. Eye. 2009;23:1314-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Chen RW, Flynn HW Jr, Lee WH, Parke DW 3rd, Isom RF, Davis JL, et al. Vitreoretinal man-agement and surgical outcomes in proliferative sickle retinopathy: A case series. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:870-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
McKinney CM, Siringo F, Olson JL, Capocelli KE, Ambruso DR, Nuss R. Red cell exchange transfusion halts progressive proliferative sickle cell retinopathy in a teenaged patient with hemoglobin SC disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(4):721-23. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/48520.16044

Date of Submission: Jan 26, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Apr 07, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 23, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 04, 2021
• Manual Googling: Oct 26, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Nov 18, 2021 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com