Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 145635

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : OD07 - OD09 Full Version

Chronic Indolent Community-acquired Pneumonia due to Pseudomonas Infection in an Immunocompetent Patient- A Case Report


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52806.16026
Gaurav Karna, Shridhar Pattar, Prasan Kumar Panda, Ramit Shah

1. Resident, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Resident, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 4. Resident, Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Prasan Kumar Panda,
Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical
Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: motherprasanna@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Pseudomonas is an uncommon cause of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent patients. It is an opportunistic pathogen resulting in serious infection in patients who are hospitalised, mechanically ventilated, or immunocompromised. Here, authors reported a case of 47-year-old male, forest worker without any co-morbidities presented with a history of chronic cough, fever, and shortness of breath complicated with pseudohaemoptysis for 45 days. This patient was admitted and treated as a lower respiratory tract infection. Work-up for tuberculosis, invasive fungal balls was negative but sputum culture revealed Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth. This case report demonstrates a rare Pseudomonas infection which can also cause chronic indolent respiratory illness in immunocompetent.

Keywords

Forest-dweller, Healthy, Lower respiratory tract infections, Pseudomonads, Pseudohaemoptysis

Case Report

A 47-year-old male, forest patrol, presented with complaints of fever for 45 days and cough and shortness of breath for 30 days. Fever was undocumented, low-grade intermittent associated with chills and rigour, without sweating responsive to medication, without any diurnal variation. It was followed by cough, gradual onset, initially dry then became productive with mucopurulent sputum, later became dark brownish, non foul smelling which increased on lying down and during night time. It was associated with the pruritic type of right sided chest pain and breathlessness. Breathlessness was an insidious onset, gradually progressive, initially with marked exertion, which progressed later to cause dyspnoea even with regular household activities, without orthopnea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea. It was not associated with decreased urine output, palpitation, or body swelling. The patient had lost weight (not documented, in the form of loosening of clothes). He was taking over the counter medications like analgesic and antitussive for symptomatic relief. He did not have a history of any co-morbidities like hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, or any known chronic illness attributed to the heart, lungs, liver or kidney. He was a chronic smoker (smoking index-400) and chronic alcohol consumer (180 mL/week for 20 years). In mean time, he had shown to local pharmacist and taken unknown cocktail treatments but with no major improvements.

On examination, the patient was conscious, oriented, pale-looking with vitals including temperature of 99.7 F, pulse rate was 110/min, respiratory rate was 23/min, blood pressure was 100/60 mmHg, Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) was 86% at room air and 97% at 3 L/min oxygen through nasal prongs. Systemic examination revealed decreased intensity of breath sound in right infra-scapular and infra-axillary area and dull note on percussion with coarse inspiratory crept over same areas. Other system examinations were unremarkable. Sputum was grossly examined that looked thick, brownish, and dark (Table/Fig 1)a.

The patient was admitted on the same day of visit to hospital and was investigated for lower respiratory tract infection. Chest X-ray (day 1) showed right sided pleural effusion with patchy infiltration in the middle zone of the right lung (Table/Fig 1)b. High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) chest (day 1) demonstrated multiple patchy areas of ground-glass attenuation in bilateral lungs, predominantly in a peripheral location; areas of consolidation were seen in basal segments of lower lobe of right lung and posterior segment of right upper lobe; fibroatelectatic bands with mild traction bronchiectasis in bilateral lungs; right pleural effusion was noted with underlying basal atelectasis, maximum thickness was 10.5 mm (Table/Fig 1)c,d. Routine investigations (Table/Fig 2) revealed bicytopenia (anaemia and thrombocytopenia). Findings were suggestive of active infective aetiology. [COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CORADS-4), CT Severity Score (CTSS-23/40)].

Considering the epidemiology, chronic symptomatology, pathology affecting lung parenchyma, and image characteristics, following differentials were considered: tuberculosis, invasive fungal granuloma, or cavitary pneumonia. To narrow down the differential, Interferon-Gamma Release Assays and β-D glucan were done which turned out negative. Sputum gram stain showed gram negative rods which was evident in sputum culture and sensitivity demonstrating growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Table/Fig 3).

On the first day of hospitalisation, patient was started empirically on intravenous ceftriaxone 1 gm twice daily along with intravenous azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 5 days for pneumonia. After sputum culture sensitivity reports on 8th day of hospitalisation, the patient was started on amikacin. Amikacin was given for 7 days parenterally by an intravenous route at a once daily dose of 15 mg/kg.

The patient’s expectoration of brownish-coloured sputum disappeared gradually after the initiation of treatment based on culture sensitivity, and he was discharged with stable vitals after 12 days of hospitalisation. On follow-up after one month, the patient was clinically asymptomatic without fever, cough, or shortness of breath. His chest X-ray was clear with disappearance of the patchy heterogenous opacity.

Discussion

This case report showed Pseudomonas can cause chronic respiratory illness and pseudohaemoptysis in healthy individual. P. aeruginosa is one of the common pathogens involved in acute or chronic respiratory tract infections in various clinical settings (1). It is ubiquitous in the hospital environment and is suspected in individuals who are immunocompromised, who have an extended hospitalisation or mechanically ventilated, have malignancies or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, have received prolonged antibiotic administration or multiple antibiotics, or who have indwelling catheters (2),(3). In chronic lung infection due to Pseudomonas, host responses are complex and dynamic ranging from vigorous activation of immune response to relative host tolerance favouring bacterial persistence (4). Pseudomonas is an uncommon cause of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent individuals (5). In the study conducted in patients with the same bacteremia, 47.6% were immunocompetent and the rest were immunocompromised (6). A point prevalence international study was done among 2564 immunocompetent patients of which Streptococcus pneumoniae (8.2%) was the most frequently identified pathogen, followed by P. aeruginosa (4.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (3.4%) (7). Even after being immunocompetent, here patient developed a chronic indolent infection of P. aeruginosa, which is not usually observed.

Data on the global burden and risk factors associated with P. aeruginosa are limited. Restrepo MI et al., conducted a study among 3193 diagnosed cases of CAP from 54 different countries, out of which 4.2% had P. aeruginosa. In contrast, the rate of P. aeruginosa CAP was 2% in patients without prior same infection or colonisation and chronic lung diseases similar to the present case (8). Respiratory diseases have long been recognised in association with the variety of occupational exposure. To quantify the burden of respiratory disease among agricultural workers, Greskevitch M et al., examined various national health statistics data in 2007 and found that obstructive respiratory abnormalities were more prevalent in farm workers (9). This study also showed that forestry workers had significantly elevated mortality for pulmonary tuberculosis, chronic airway obstruction, and pneumonia, organism unspecified. Considering this case had forest indwelling, it may be associated with indolent community-acquired pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa.

Chronic cough with fever and weight loss complicated by haemoptysis are moreover prevalent in tuberculosis and bronchiectasis (10). But in this patient, the colour of the sputum was brownish and was initially thought to be blood-tinged so tests were carried out for tuberculosis. Rather the culture and sensitivity for the sputum revealed Pseudomonas infection. In addition, there is literature, which illustrates that deepening sputum colour from yellowish to brownish is associated with an increased yield of gram negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas or Enterobacteriaceae, illustrates pseudohaemoptysis (11).

In various studies conducted, combinations of beta-lactams and aminoglycosides have benefits over the monotherapy against Pseudomonas infection (12),(13). Here, this patient was started on beta-lactams as empirical treatment and later, it was switched to amikacin for being sensitive. Among aminoglycosides, amikacin holds better bactericidal activity being concentration-dependent killing and usually due to lower resistance to P. aeruginosa (12). Likewise, a retrospective cohort study was done to establish the relationship between initial inappropriate antimicrobial treatment and the clinical outcomes for P. aeruginosa infections which showed that hospital mortality was significantly higher for patients receiving inappropriate initial antimicrobial treatment than for those receiving appropriate therapy (31% versus 18%; p-value=0.02) (13). Hence, the right dose and duration are important in the treatment of P. aeruginosa infection.

In the study conducted in 126 patients with P. aeruginosa infection, the mortality in immunocompetent patients was lower than immunocompromised patients {7 day mortality-8% vs 30% (p-value=0.01); 30 day mortality-23% vs 39% (p-value=0.053)} (6). Initial antibiotic therapy (Heart rate: 0.21, p-value=0.01) and patient's immune status (Heart rate: 0.29, p-value=0.02) also had a significant impact on survival. A subgroup analysis showed that in immunocompromised, but not immunocompetent patients, initial appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with lower mortality {30 day mortality 20.5% vs 66.7% (p-value <0.01 by log-rank test)} (6). Even here, this patient showed remarkable improvements both clinically and radiologically after initiation of the definitive treatment based on culture sensitivity.

Conclusion

Pseudomonas aeruginosa can cause chronic indolent pneumonia in immunocompetent. Forestry workers can be a risk factor for the same. All sputum history of haemoptysis is not true, haemoptysis deepening sputum colour from yellowish to brownish can be due to indolent pseudomonas lung infection. Monotherapy with amikacin can be used for primary treatment of chronic Pseudomonas infection.

References

1.
Sadikot RT, Blackwell TS, Christman JW, Prince AS. Pathogen-host interactions in pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(11):1209-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Fujitani S, Moffett kathryn S, Yu VL. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrobe: Infectious Disease & Antimicrobial. 2017. Available from: http://www.antimicrobe.org/new/b112.asp.
3.
Qureshi S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Medscape. 2020. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/226748-overview.
4.
Faure E, Kwong K, Nguyen D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic lung infections: How to adapt within the host? Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9:2416. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Gharabaghi MA, Abdollahi SMM, Safavi E, Abtahi SH. Community acquired Pseudomonas pneumonia in an immunocompetent host. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;26;2012:bcr0120125673. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3369319/. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Migiyama Y, Yanagihara K, Kaku N, Harada Y, Yamada K, Nagaoka K, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia among immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients: Relation to initial antibiotic therapy and survival. J Infect Dis. 2016;69(2):91-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Carugati M, Aliberti S, Sotgiu G, Blasi F, Gori A, Menendez R, et al. Bacterial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent hospitalised patients and appropriateness of empirical treatment recommendations: An international point-prevalence study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(8):1513-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Restrepo MI, Babu BL, Reyes LF, Chalmers JD, Soni NJ, Sibila O, et al. Burden and risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa community-acquired pneumonia: A multinational point prevalence study of hospitalised patients. Eur Respir J. 2018;52(2):1701190. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Greskevitch M, Kullman G, Bang KM, Mazurek J. Respiratory disease in agricultural workers: Mortality and morbidity statistics. J Agromedicine. 2007;12(3):05-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations 3rd edition. Boston: Butterworths; 1990;211-13. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK360/#A1225.
11.
Allegra L, Blasi F, Diano PL, Cosentini R, Tarsia P, Confalonieri M, et al. Sputum colour as a marker of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2005;99(6):742-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Bassetti M, Vena A, Croxatto A, Righi E, Guery B. How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs in Context. 2018;7:212527. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5978525/. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
McDonald LC, Owings M, Jernigan DB. Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(3):409-15. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52806.16026

Date of Submission: Oct 12, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Dec 08, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 15, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 13, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 14, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 30, 2021 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com