Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 281689

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : OR01 - OR04 Full Version

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Threat of a Multidrug Resistant Infection in Hosts with Co-morbidities- A Case Series


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51086.16040
Shubhransu Patro, Sudhansu Sekhar Panda, Siddharth Mishra, Payod Kumar Jena, Abhilash Patnaik

1. Professor, Department of General Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Professor, Department of General Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Professor, Department of General Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. Postgraduate Resident, Department of General Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Abhilash Patnaik,
Flat 801, Satyabdai Enclave, Gayatri Vihar, Near CS Pur Police Station, Patia,
Bhubaneswar-751023, Odisha, India.
E-mail: patnaikabhilash8@gmail.com

Abstract

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S.maltophilia) was first identified in the year 1943. Since the discovery, the organism has been classified into multiple genus. Finally, Stenotrophomonas genus was created in 1993 and has steadily been growing in prevalence since then. S.maltophilia is an organism of low virulence but owing to its inherent resistance to commonly used antibiotics and some peculiar resistance mechanism, the organism is poising challenge as a nosocomial infection, hence high index of suspicion is essential in part of physicians for early intervention and better prognosis. Five cases (35 years old male, 18 years old female, 55 years old female,82 years old male and 60 years old male patients) of S. maltophilia infection, diagnosed by various diagnostic modalities like chest x-ray and relevant blood investigations, in hosts with co-morbidities (like diabetes, hypertension, sickle cell disease, psychiatric illness etc.) are presented here along with a brief review. The patients were treated by antibiotic therapy according to culture sensitivity report and were discharged at time range of 10-21 days of hospitalisation after improvement of clinical condition and laboratory reports of the patients.

Keywords

Antibiotics, Nosocomial infection, Resistance, Virulence

S.maltophilia was first identified from the pleural effusion fluid in the year 1943 and was named Bacterium booker (1). It was ultimately classified as Stenotrophomonas in the year 1993 as proposed by Palleroni and Bradbury (1),(2). The prevalence of the infection due to Stenotrophomonas has increased steadily in the general population as well as in critical care set-up as evident by recent studies (2). The prevalence of infection due to S.maltophilia in the general population was 0.8-1.4% from 1997 through 2003, which has increased to 1.3-1.68% during the period 2007-2012 (3). Similarly, the prevalence of infection in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setup was 1.6% from 1997-1998 which has increased to 2.6% in 2011 (3). According to a review on S.maltophilia infection in bloodstream, it was found out that the mortality in case of pneumonia ranged from 23-77% while a blood stream infection caused fatality starting at 21% ranging up to 62% (4). Recently, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has specified S.maltophilia as a great public health concern in nosocomial settings from a resistance point of view (5). Here, five cases of S.maltophilia infection in host with co-morbidities and a brief overview of the same is described.

Case Report

Case 1

A 35-year-old, chronic alcoholic male patient, presented with fever, cough with expectoration for three days and chest pain for a day. The patient was admitted to the critical care ward and was put on mechanical ventilation, ionotropic support and was started on empirical antibiotics (piperacillin tazobactam and linezolid).

On first day of investigation, there was neutrophilic leucocytosis (13250/mcl, 85% neutrophils), raised liver enzymes (Serum Glutamic-oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) -227, Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) -132, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) -457, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)-153), raised serum procalcitonin (10.8 ng/mL) with the rest of the biochemical parameters (renal function tests, coagulation profile, electrolyte) within normal limits. Right lower lobe consolidation with pleural effusion was evident in Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the thorax (Table/Fig 1) and Endotracheal Tube (ET-tube) aspirate culture showed growth of S.maltophilia. Empirical antibiotics were changed to high dose Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (TMP equivalent dose of 15 mg TMP/kg/day i.v. divided q8hr) according to the culture sensitivity report and was continued for two weeks. He was discharged on tenth day of his hospitalisation as his condition improved (Table/Fig 2).

Case 2

An 18-year-old female patient, who was a known case of sickle cell disease, presented with complaints of fever, cough with expectoration for five days and seizures for one day. She was diagnosed with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with bilateral pneumonia. She was managed in emergency ward with mechanical ventilation, inotrope support and empirical antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam and clarithromycin). Subsequently, investigations revealed neutrophilic leucocytosis (15050/mcl, 89% neutrophils), raised serum procalcitonin level (19.8 ng/mL). Chest x-ray showed a homogenous opacity over right lower zone and ET aspirate culture revealed growth of S.maltophilia. Antibiotic was changed to TMP-SMX (TMP equivalent dose of 15 mg TMP/kg/day IV divided q8hr) as per culture sensitivity report. The clinical condition started improving after seven days of starting TMP and after two weeks of treatment she was discharged in a stable clinical condition (Table/Fig 3). She did well in her last follow-up and thereafter.

Case 3

A 55-year-old female patient, with known psychiatric illness presented with fever, altered sensorium for five days and multiple erythematous skin rashes involving the whole body (Table/Fig 4) as well as oral cavity for three days. There was no history of any new drug intake in the recent past. She was managed conservatively and all samples were sent for investigation. Subsequently, culture of aspirated pus from the skin lesion revealed S.maltophilia which was sensitive to TMP-SMX. The patient was treated with TMP-SMX for two weeks and was discharged.

Case 4

An 82-year-old male patient, with a history of diabetes mellitus, not on regular treatment, attended emergency ward with complaints of fever, cough with expectoration for eight days and vomiting for five days. He had a history of hospitalisation 20 days back. The patient was managed in the critical care unit with mechanical ventilation, inotropic support, regular insulin and empirical antibiotics (meropenem and teicoplanin). Investigation revealed, raised HbA1c (Glycated Haemoglobin) (9.1%) and neutrophilic leucocytosis (21,780/mcl, 94% neutrophil) with raised serum procalcitonin (9.7 ng/mL), serum urea (72 mg/dL) and creatinine (1.6 mg/dL). X-ray chest showed a homogenous opacity over right middle zone and the endotracheal tube aspirate revealed growth of S.maltophilia. He was managed with high dose TMP-SMX (TMP equivalent dose of 15 mg TMP/kg/day IV divided q8hr) as per the culture sensitivity report along with regular insulin, mechanical ventilation and vasopressors. His clinical condition started improving after two weeks of management in critical care unit and after three weeks of treatment, he was discharged (Table/Fig 5).

Case 5

A 60-year-old diabetic and hypertensive male patient, presented with fever, cough with expectoration for six days, and shortness of breath for three days. He was managed in the emergency ward with mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support and empirical antibiotics (meropenem and teicoplanin). The patient had neutrophilic leucocytosis and high HbA1c (7.8%). Bilateral non homogenous opacities were seen on chest X-ray (Table/Fig 6) and the endotracheal tube aspirate culture showed growth of S.maltophilia. As per the sensitivity report, empirical antibiotics were stopped and high dose of TMP-SMX (TMP equivalent dose of 15 mg TMP/kg/day IV divided q8hr) was started. After two weeks of management in critical care unit, his clinical condition started improving and one week later he was discharged with an advice for regular follow-up and is doing well (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

S.maltophilia is the only member of the Stenotrophomonas genus known to cause infection in humans (2). The organism is a motile, aerobic, gram-negative, glucose non fermentative bacillus and can be found in extreme of terrains (hospital as well as community) (3),(6). It has been sequestered from a variety of water bodies, soil samples, and plant biospheres (7). The virulence factors of S.maltophilia have been primarily segregated into extracellular and cell-associated factors. The extracellular factors have chiefly been comprised of extracellular enzymes namely proteases, cytotoxins, siderophores. The cell-associated factors mainly are lipopolysaccharide, fimbriae, non pilus adhesin and flagella (8). The biofilm is a peculiar property of the bacteria, which basically is a cell-associated factor for anti-microbial resistance. Biofilm is formation of a coating on inanimate as well as tissue surfaces, which is an aggregate of bacterial cells that are implanted in an extracellular matrix consisting of polysaccharides and proteins. This mechanism facilitates resistance to different antimicrobial and antiseptic. A newer method to identify the pathogen is Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), can also segregate biofilm producing organism from others (9),(10).

S.maltophilia is generally considered as an organism of low virulence, thus has been identified as an opportunistic pathogen (1),(3). The various predisposing factors for infection are, hosts with haematologic malignancy, cystic fibrosis, prior antibiotic use, diabetes mellitus, immunodeficient patients, individuals admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU), patients on mechanical ventilation and presence of indwelling catheters (11).

The most common co-morbidity reported in this case-series was diabetes mellitus which was present in three out of five cases while sickle cell disease, hypertension was present in two cases and one patient was a chronic alcoholic. Four out of five cases were on mechanical ventilation and one patient had prior history of hospital admission (20 days back) in an ICU set-up. These data show a similar pattern as discussed in other case reports and literature (12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23).

Ebara H et al., in their case series of 44 cases, have described the common predisposing factor for the S.maltophilia infection was intubation (54.5%), intensive care unit admission (52.3%), haematological malignancy (29.5%), solid organ malignancy (22.7%). The most common site of bacteraemia was central venous line (36.4%). History of Carbapenem and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) drug exposure was present in 63.6% and 47.7and cases, respectively (15).

A previous study found that the most common presentation of S.maltophilia infection is pneumonia (55.8%), followed by bloodstream infection (33.8%) (12). Osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, skin, and soft tissue infections, meningitis, endocarditis are less common manifestation (2),(5). Out of the five cases discussed in this article, four had pneumonia, one had skin and subcutaneous infection and two patients had bilateral lung involvement. As described in literature the most common presentation is pneumonia and a similar picture can be seen in this series also (12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23).

In few cases series endocarditis and pericarditis have also been reported where the patient had either haematological malignancy or were under renal replacement therapy (17),(18). Few cases of rare presentation like spondylodiscitis, cervical osteomyelitis and keratitis were also reported. All the patients had undergone surgical procedures for contaminated wounds (20),(21). Another rare presentation of S.maltophilia keratitis (in bandage contact lenses users) has also been reported (22).

The pathogen grows well in commonly used media like blood agar as well as in commercially used systems (Vitek AutoMicrobic, Biolog, etc.,) (2). S.maltophilia is inherently resistant to regularly used antibiotics like β-lactams, carbapenems, macrolides, aminoglycosides, and cephalosporins (11),(24). Most consistent finding in all the cases was neutrophilic leucocytosis along with raised serum procalcitonin levels which is a common finding of infective pathology. Raised hepatic enzymes were seen in only one case. Culture sensitivity report revealed the pathogen which was sensitive to TMP-SMX and quinolones (Levofloxacin) while resistant to the carbapenems and third generation cephalosporines which support the earlier literature description (24),(25).

The first-line treatment is primarily comprised of high dose TMP-SMX (TMP equivalent dose of 15mg TMP/kg/day IV divided q6-8hr) (11),(25). The second line treatments are Fluoroquinolones, Ticarcillin with clavulanate, Minocycline, etc., (24),(25). Some of the proposed combination therapies are TMP-SMX with any of the second line agent or Ceftazidime (24).

Conclusion

As S.maltophilia possesses challenges in the management due to its inherent ability to develop resistance to commonly used antibiotics, there is a need for a high index of suspicion and early initiation of an appropriate antibiotic for a better outcome. However, more studies are needed to ascertain more effective and diverse management options.

References

1.
Singhal L, Kaur P, Gautam V. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: From trivial to grievous. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2017;35(4):469-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Brooke JS. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An emerging global opportunistic pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(1):02-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Chang YT, Lin CY, Chen YH, Hsueh PR. Update on infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with particular attention to resistance mechanisms and therapeutic options. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:893. Doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00893. eCollection 2015. [crossref]
4.
Garazi M, Singer C, Tai J, Ginocchio CC. Bloodstream infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A seven-year review. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81(2):114-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
WHO; Prevention of hospital-acquired infections; A practical guide; 2nd edition; WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/2002.12; https://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/whocdscsreph200212.pdf
6.
Corlouer C, Lamy B, Desroches M, Desroches M, Ramos-Vivas J, Mehiri-Zghal E, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia healthcare-associated infections: identification of two main pathogenic genetic backgrounds. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96(2):183-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Trifonova A, Strateva T. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia- a low-grade pathogen with numerous virulence factors. Infect Dis (Lond). 2019;51(3):168-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Looney WJ, Narita M, Mühlemann K. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An emerging opportunist human pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(5):312-23. [crossref]
9.
Montoya-Hinojosa E, Bocanegra-Ibarias P, Garza-González E, Alonso-Ambriz ÓM, Salazar-Mata GA, Villarreal-Treviño L, et al. Discrimination of biofilm-producing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical strains by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0244751. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Gil-Gil T, Martínez JL, Blanco P. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A review of current knowledge. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18(4):335-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Andelković MV, Janković SM, Kostić MJ, Živković Zarić RS, Opanc??ina VD, Živić MŽ, et al. Antimicrobial treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia invasive infections: Systematic review. J Chemother. 2019;31(6):297-306.
12.
Ibn Saied W, Merceron S, Schwebel C, Le Monnier A, Oziel J, Garrouste-Orgeas M, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Risk factors and outcome. J Infect. 2020;80(3):279-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Farrar JE, Garner KM, Swanson JM, Magnotti LJ, Croce MA, Wood GC. Tigecycline to treat Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ventilator-associated pneumonia in a trauma intensive care unit as a result of a drug shortage: A case series. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020;45(4):836-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Andrei S, Ghiaur A, Brezeanu L, Martac C, Nicolau A, Coriu D, et al. Successful treatment of pulmonary haemorrhage and acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by fulminant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia respiratory infection in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia- case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):658. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Ebara H, Hagiya H, Haruki Y, Kondo E, Otsuka F. Clinical characteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia: A regional report and a review of a Japanese case series. Intern Med. 2017;56(2):137-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Khanum I, Ilyas A, Ali F. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Meningitis- A case series and review of the literature. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e11221. [crossref]
17.
Shah S, King M, Rose L. Medical management of endocarditis caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A case report. J Pharm Pract. 2019;32(6):683-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Bulut Avşar C, Aydemir S, Tas¸bakan M, Pullukçu H, Ulusoy S, Kayikçioğlu LM, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pericarditis. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017;18(6):439-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Sawai T, Yoshioka S, Matsuo N, Suyama N, Mukae H. Intraabdominal abscess caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;41:212-14. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Oct 27. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Adsul NM, Panigrahi V, Acharya S, Kalra KL, Chahal RS. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia spondylodiscitis following lumbar microdiscectomy mimicking a cotton granuloma: A case report and literature review. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11:28. Doi: 10.25259/SNI_23_2020 [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Ilyas H, Tabaie S, Place H. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of stenotrophomonas maltophilia discitis and cervical osteomyelitis: A case report and review of the literature. JBJS Case Connect. 2016;6(2):e23. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Hogg HDJ, Siah WF, Okonkwo A, Narayanan M, Figueiredo FC. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia-A case series of a rare keratitis affecting patients with bandage contact lens. Eye Contact Lens. 2019;45(1):e01-04. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Ting DSJ, Bignardi G, Koerner R, Irion LD, Johnson E, Morgan SJ, et al. Polymicrobial keratitis with Cryptococcus curvatus, Candida parapsilosis, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia after penetrating keratoplasty: A rare case report with literature review. Eye Contact Lens. 2019;45(2):e05-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Abbott IJ, Peleg AY. Stenotrophomonas, Achromobacter, and nonmelioid Burkholderia species: Antimicrobial resistance and therapeutic strategies. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(1):99-110. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Ko JH, Kang CI, Cornejo-Juárez P, Yeh KM, Wang CH, Cho SY, et al. Fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(5):546-54. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51086.16040

Date of Submission: Jul 07, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 22, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jan 05, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 08, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jan 04, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 14, 2022 (2%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com