Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 76241

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : QC09 - QC14 Full Version

Dihydrotestosterone- A Potential Biomarker of Hyperandrogenaemia in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Case-control Study from North India


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51169.15962
Hemant Kumar, Ashutosh Halder, Mona Sharma, Manish Jain, Amanpreet Kaur Kalsi

1. Ex-PhD Student, Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 3. Additional Professor, Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 4. Scientist, Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 5. Ex-PhD Student, Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ashutosh Halder,
Professor and Head, Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of
Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India.
E-mail: ashutoshhalder@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a complex reproductive disorder characterised by hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction and polycystic/enlarged ovary. Although clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism is one of the major features of PCOS, biochemical hyperandrogenism in the form of high testosterone and/or Free Androgen Index (FAI) is rarely observed in the Asian Indians.

Aim: To assess various androgens to determine best available biomarker of androgens in PCOS from North India.

Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted in the Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, between January 2016 to December 2019. During this period 137 female with PCOS and 49 female as control were included. Serum total testosterone (T), FAI, Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulphate (DHEAS), androstenedione and Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) were measured besides assessment of hirsutism using the Ferriman-Gallwey (FG) scale. Statistical differences were derived using Mann-Whitney U test, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Spearman’s correlation test.

Results: There were 87 PCOS cases with phenotype A, 25 PCOS cases with phenotype B, 10 PCOS cases with phenotype C and 15 PCOS cases with phenotype D. The mean age was 23.7 years in the PCOS group and 26.2 years in the control group. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) in the PCOS group was 25.23 kg/m2 and in the control was 22.6 kg/m2 . FG score of ≥9 was observed in 75.9% PCOS cases. High (mean+2SD) levels of T (≥0.51 ng/mL), FAI (≥2.55), DHEAS (≥309 ug/dL), androstenedione (≥2.2 ng/mL) and DHT (≥462 pg/mL) were observed in 35.29%, 56.25%, 14.18%, 18.62% and 61.38% cases, respectively. Mean DHT value was 584.27 pg/mL in study group whereas in control was 257.15 pg/mL (p-value <0.00001) and area under ROC curve was 0.895. Similarly, area under ROC curve was 0.86, 0.817, 0.721 and 0.63 for FAI, testosterone, DHEAS and androstenedione, respectively. Spearman’s correlation test of androgens with BMI, age and FG Score did not find any associations with DHT.

Conclusion: Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is best available biomarker and can be considered as diagnostic biomarker of hyperandrogenemia in PCOS women from North India.

Keywords

Androgens, Diagnostic criteria, Hirsutism, Phenotypes

The Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a complex reproductive disorder characterised by clinical hyperandrogenism (hirsutism, acne, excess hair loss, acanthosis nigricans, hoarse voice, etc) and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism {high Testosterone (T) and/or Free Androgen Index (FAI)}, chronic oligo-ovulation or anovulation (oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea) and polycystic ovarian morphology (polycystic and/or enlarged ovary). It is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age with a prevalence of 10-15% (1),(2). PCOS is the leading cause of anovulatory infertility (3). At present commonly followed PCOS diagnostic criteria world-wide is Rotterdam criteria (2003) but in this study a phenotypic approach to diagnose and classifying PCOS was followed (2),(4),(5). This approach classifies PCOS cases into four phenotypes as phenotype A, B, C and D. Although hyperandrogenemia (high total T or high FAI) is one of the major features of PCOS, it is rarely observed in the Asian Indians (6). To date, no sensitive biomarker of hyperandrogenemia is available in the Asian Indians. Hence, there is a need to search for a better hyperandrogenemia marker, in addition to relook cut-off values for the Asian Indians.

We are working on PCOS for many years and observed mismatch between clinical hyperandrogenism {hirsutism; Ferriman-Gallwey (FG) score ≥9 in about 75% cases} and hyperandrogenemia (high T in 35% cases). At present, testosterone is the most common test in routine clinical practice for the investigation of hyperandrogenemia (7), although it is poorly correlated in Asian Indians. Furthermore, there is no consensus on which androgen to be measured and what analytical technique should be used for quantification (8). Due to a lack of sensitivity and specificity of older direct immunoassays of testosterone and the very low serum concentrations of testosterone in women. The Endocrine Society recommends avoiding immunoassays and suggesting for more precise mass spectrometry-based assay for testosterone quantifications (9). Mass spectrometry assay is expensive and requires high end laboratory setup hence difficult to have in most laboratories, particularly in the South Asian countries including India. The new automated architect 2nd generation testosterone assay platform (chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay) is capable of measuring male samples with comparable accuracy and precision with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and with sensitivity of 0.06 ng/mL (0.15 nmol/L). However, assay specificity remains a challenge for measuring testosterone in female. Studies also have shown androgen excess may be missed if only testosterone is measured (10).

Androgens can be secreted from the ovaries and the adrenal glands, but can also be generated from precursors in adipose or peripheral tissues. Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is almost entirely produced by peripheral conversion of androgens and has a circulating concentration of 3-10% that of testosterone in normal women. However, in PCOS women excess DHT in circulation may also come from ovary (excess 5?-reductase activity in ovary) (11). Steroid hormones like androstenedione or testosterone can themselves be further metabolised to other androgens like DHT (more potent androgen). In addition, DHT synthesis may follow the back-door pathway that bypasses testosterone and androstenediol (mainly in adrenal cortex) and depends on androsterone as the predominant backdoor androgen (12) or an alternative route that requires steroid 5?-reductase isoenzyme-1 and bypasses T (13). Therefore, it is important to investigate PCOS cases for serum DHT also as many could be having atypical congenital adrenal hyperplasia or overactive back door pathway. Hence, the present study was conducted, to investigate DHT with various other androgens for assessment of best available androgen in PCOS patients.

Material and Methods

This case-control study was conducted in the Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, from January 2016 to December 2019. During this period 263 patients were referred from various parts of North India with provisional diagnosis of PCOS. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Postgraduate Research (T-329/23.06.2015, RT-16/22.07.2015) and Institute Ethics Committee (IEC-730/29.12.2017, RP-02/2018). All patients underwent clinical and basic evaluation before included into the study.

Inclusion criteria: PCOS cases were selected for the study after evaluation of reproductive and menstrual history (oligomenorrhoea/amenorrhoea), hirsutism (FG score) (14), testosterone level and ovarian ultrasonography (polycystic and/or enlarged).

Exclusion criteria: Before inclusion as PCOS every case were evaluated for drug induced hyperandrogenism, androgen producing tumors (ovarian neoplasm, adrenal neoplasm, thecoma), hyperprolactinemia, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Cushing syndrome, hypothyroidism, or premature ovarian failure and excluded from study. In some cases, chromosome analysis was also carried out to exclude rare secondary causes like disorder of sex development/sex reversal.

Sample size calculation: Sample size for the study was computed for comparing testosterone level between PCOS and controls based on the following assumptions: Mean (SD) in PCOS as 1.5 (0.5) nmol/L (0.6 ng/ml) and in controls as 1.0 (0.5) nmol/L (0.4 ng/mL) with 95% confidence level, 90% power and control: PCOS as 1:2 allocation ratio. Study investigators expected more variations in PCOS cases as compared to control female. Therefore, investigators considered 1:2 allocation ratio in sample size calculation. The minimum sample size required was 44 controls and 88 cases. Although study investigators planned for 2:1 ratio but later included all eligible PCOS cases. Investigators enrolled 49 controls and 131 PCOS cases in the study i.e., beyond minimum requirements. The sample size was computed using STATA 15.0 statistical software.

Rotterdam criteria (2003) with modifications in the form of phenotypic classifications by National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2012 criteria. (Table/Fig 1) was followed to assign cases as PCOS (4),(5). PCOS cases were grouped into four as phenotype A (hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction and polycystic and/or enlarged ovary), phenotype B (hyperandrogenism and ovulatory dysfunction), phenotype C (hyperandrogenism and polycystic and/or enlarged ovary) and phenotype D (ovulatory dysfunction and polycystic and/or enlarged ovary).

A menstrual cycle length of 42 days or more (instead of 35 days) were considered as oligomenorrhoea and 182 days for amenorrhoea. The clinical hyperandrogenism in the form of hirsutism was assessed using FG scale and a score of ≥9 was considered as clinical hyperandrogenism (14). Polycystic ovarian morphology was considered when targeted ovarian ultrasonography show follicles size of 2-9 mm and count ≥12 in one or both ovaries with ovarian size 10 mL or more (one/both ovaries). All cases were also evaluated for cortisol, Luteinising Hormone (LH), Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), DHEAS, estradiol, progesterone, prolactin and TSH to exclude secondary causes (all were analysed in Abbott Inc. autoanalyser).

Testosterone Estimation

Testosterone estimation was carried out using ARCHITECT 2nd Generation Testosterone kit (2P13; ABBL421/R03) and ARCHITECT i2000 System. The ARCHITECT 2nd Generation Testosterone assay releases testosterone from binding proteins and measures total testosterone. The ARCHITECT 2nd Generation Testosterone assay is a delayed one-step immunoassay for the quantitative determination of testosterone in human serum and plasma using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay technology. The expected kit ranges for normal females aged 21-49 years was 0.25-2.75 nmol/L (0.072-0.793 ng/mL) with a median value of 0.86 nmol/L or 0.25 ng/mL. This testosterone assay is designed to have a within-laboratory (total) precision of <10% Coefficient of Variation (CV) for samples with testosterone concentrations between 0.5 to 35 nmol/L (0.2 to 14 ng/mL). Sensitivity of kit (limit of quantification) was 0.15 nmol/L (0.06 ng/mL). The 17-hydroxy progesterone (EIA1292) and Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) were measured using commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit (EIA2996R; DRG International, Inc., USA).

After preliminary evaluation:

• Cases: 137 cases were found as PCOS.
• Control: 49 normal (having normal menstrual cycle and fertility) female in reproductive age as control for the comparison.

Procedure

Blood samples were collected from patients between 2-5 days of menstrual cycle (or following progesterone withdrawal) after obtaining written consent for the study. Blood collected in plain test tube, allowed to coagulate at room temperature for about one hour and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes, serum (supernatant) collected in serum vial using 1 mL micropipette and either used immediately in Abbott autoanalyser {testosterone (T), Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Luetinising Hormone (LH), prolactin, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), estradiol, progesterone, Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), cortisol} or stored at minus 80ÂşC for future analysis (DHT, androstenedione, SHBG and 17-hydroxy progesterone). DHT (DBC-Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc. Ontario, Canada; Cat No. CAN-DHT-280, version 7) and androstenedione (DRG International, Inc. USA; Cat No. EIA-3265, version 6.1) were estimated using commercial ELISA kits. The principle of the tests follows the typical competitive binding mechanism. Inter and intra-assay Coefficients of Variability (CV) for DHT were between 3.9-12.1 depending upon value of DHT, higher the values lower the CV. The minimum detection limit (sensitivity) of DHT kit was 6.0 pg/mL. DHT recovery rate of the kit was over 90% and kit to kit variation was <5%. Kit reference range for women in reproductive age group was 24-368 pg/mL. But reference range for North Indian female is unavailable.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical differences between cases and controls were derived using Mann-Whitney U test (two-tailed) method. Predictive values were also evaluated with the use of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis using STATA 15.0 statistical software. Association between androgens and Body Mass Index (BMI) as well as FG score and age was carried out using Spearman’s correlation test. The p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

This study was based on 137 primary PCOS cases and 49 control women. There were 87 PCOS cases with phenotype A, 25 PCOS cases with phenotype B, 10 PCOS cases with phenotype C and 15 PCOS cases with phenotype D. The mean age was 23.7 years in the PCOS group and 26.2 years in the control group (Table/Fig 2).The age difference was statistically significant (p-value <0.001) in all types of PCOS cases in comparison to controls, although number of cases in phenotype B, C and D were small. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) in the PCOS group was 25.23 kg/m2 and in the control was 22.6 kg/m2. The BMI difference between PCOS (total, phenotype A and B) and control was statistically significant (Table/Fig 2).

The clinical hyperandrogenism in the form of hirsutism was assessed using FG scale. FG score of ≥9 was considered as clinical hyperandrogenism (14). FG score of ≥9 was observed in 75.9% (101/133) cases (Table/Fig 2). A FG score of ≥9 was observed in 77.9% (67/86) cases with phenotype A, 96% (24/25) cases with phenotype B, 100% (10/10) cases with phenotype C and 0% (0/12) cases with phenotype D. Details of detection rate (>cut-off value, from control mean+2SD) of various parameters of hyperandrogenism (clinical and biochemical) in PCOS cases is represented in (Table/Fig 3). (Table/Fig 4) shows details of ROC cut-off value with sensitivity/specificity of various androgens in PCOS cases. Best sensitivity and specificity were observed with DHT (77% and 89% at cut-off 382 pg/mL) followed by FAI (71% and 95% at cut-off 1.9) and T (84% and 71% at cut of 0.28 ng/mL). (Table/Fig 5) represents statistical comparisons of androgens between cases and controls. The ROC curve analysis was performed for all androgens (Table/Fig 6). AUC of ROC >0.9 was observed in DHT and FAI in phenotype A. (Table/Fig 4) shows ROC curve of DHT in PCOS cases, including subtypes. (Table/Fig 7) compares DHT, FG score and age in relation with BMI and no effect of BMI with DHT or FG score was observed. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of androgens with BMI, FGS and age detected negligible correlation coefficient with most but weak correlation coefficient with FGS (testosterone and DHEAS) and BMI (FAI) but not with DHT/androstenedione (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

The PCOS is a heterogeneous condition. It is characterised by clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism (hirsutism and/or high testosterone), ovarian dysfunction (oligo/anovulation) and polycystic and/or enlarged ovary. Hyperandrogenism is regarded as key factor for the diagnosis of PCOS hence androgen excess should be evaluated in all women suspected of PCOS (15). The serum testosterone is the most commonly used marker for hyperandrogenemia (7). However, high testosterone is rarely observed in Indian women with PCOS despite clinical hyperandrogenism (6),(16). High level of testosterone (>0.51 ng/mL) was observed in only 35.3% total PCOS cases, mean testosterone was 0.487 ng/mL in study group whereas in control group 0.262 ng/ml and area under ROC curve for testosterone was 0.817 (total cases). Similarly, FAI is rarely used as diagnostic parameters of biochemical hyperandrogenemia in Indian women with PCOS due to complexity, cost and poor association (17). Biochemical hyperandrogenism was conventionally measured as high testosterone (>0.6 ng/mL) (18),(19) or high FAI (>4½) (19),(20) whereas clinical hyperandrogenism measured as high FG score (hirsutism grade ≥9) (14) and/or other features of hyperandrogenism like acne, alopecia, acanthosis nigricans, hoarse voice, etc. As female reproductive hormone level, including androgen varies during menstrual cycle and at minimum in early follicular phase, the present study measured all androgens in early follicular phase (spontaneous or withdrawal cycle; within first five days of cycle).

During the study the authors observed mismatch between hirsutism/clinical hyperandrogenism (FG score ≥9 in 75.9% cases) and biochemical hyperandrogenism (testosterone >0.51 ng/mL in about 35.2% cases or FAI >2.55 in about 56.2% cases; present study cut-off values). This is also supported by weak correlation between FG score and testosterone and no correlation with FAI and FG score. The reasons for this in north Indian women with PCOS are not known but could be due to differences in the activity of the 5? reductase enzyme that converts testosterone to the more active metabolite DHT in skin (17). Although testosterone (and/or FAI) is the central hallmark of hyperandrogenism, DHT measurement has been also advocated to enhance diagnostic performance in PCOS (21). The FG score/hirsutism is directly related to androgen that mainly acts on skin, hair follicles etc. Among all androgens local DHT seems directly related to hirsutism (22),(23). As local skin DHT measurement is difficult hence authors tried to find out relationship with serum DHT and found no correlation with serum DHT and FG score. Although the study did not find any correlation between serum DHT and hirsutism but observed significantly higher value of serum DHT in PCOS women. Serum DHT probably reflects excess androgen synthesis in the ovary and/or adrenal (back door pathway) or peripheral tissues and justify to incorporate as biomarker for the androgen excess.

In this study, high FAI (>2.55) was observed overall in 56.25% total cases, mean FAI was 4.84 in study group whereas in control 1.068 and area under ROC curve for FAI was 0.86 (total cases). FAI at a cut-off value of 2.55 detects about 56% cases. However, much higher cut-off values (4.5 to 6.1) of FAI have been reported in literature (24),(25),(26). Similarly, high DHT (>462 pg/mL) was observed in 61.38% total PCOS cases, mean DHT was 584.27 pg/mL in study group whereas in control 257.15 pg/mL and area under ROC curve for DHT was 0.895 {lower and upper bound 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.835-0.94}. ROC curve analysis suggests that DHT is superior to other androgens in the diagnosis of hyperandrogenemia in PCOS. The study observed area under ROC curve in PCOS cases for DHT as 0.895 with lower and upper bound 95% CI as 0.843, 0.947; p-value <0.0001 and for phenotype A as 0.945 with lower and upper bound 95% CI as 0.908, 0.982; p-value <0.0001. The best compromise was obtained with a cut-off value of 382 pg/mL for PCOS diagnosis with a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 89% with total PCOS cases and 82% and 93% with phenotype A PCOS cases (cut-off value 413 pg/mL). ROC curve analysis revealed 279-413 pg/mL (depending upon phenotypes) as best cut-off value for DHT which is much lower than the value considered to define patients with high value (>462 pg/mL) in this study. This signifies that DHT is likely to be associated with PCOS in 77% total PCOS cases and 82% with phenotype A, considering 382 (total) and 413 (phenotype A) pg/mL cut-off value, instead 462 pg/mL cut-off value (mean+2SD). The DHT estimation seems comparatively simple (single test) and more sensitive. Androgen excess in many PCOS cases may have been missed if only T and/or FAI were determined, and hence the measurement of DHT is recommended for the detection of hyperandrogenemia in north Indian women with PCOS to improve diagnosis of hyperandrogenemia. This is also viewed by others (27),(28). Authors have also evaluated other potential androgens acting mainly on skin, hair follicles etc and implicated in PCOS like androstenedione but did not find any strong association. Similarly, comparisons of DHT, FG score and age with BMI did not find any statistical significance except high BMI with older age group.

The study has also analysed correlation of androgens with BMI, FG score and age and observed weak correlation between testosterone/DHEAS with FG score as well as FAI with BMI. The limitation of the use of FAI could be due to low serum SHBG with obesity which was evident in about 50% cases of PCOS. However, authors did not find any correlation with DHT or androstenedione and BMI or FG score. This indicates that serum DHT or androstenedione probably do not play a significant role in hirsutism or BMI change. The strength of the study was being prospective in nature and well characterised homogeneous group of PCOS cases. Another positive factor for the study was exclusion of cases with apparent secondary causes (CAH, gonadal tumour, premature ovarian failure) of PCOS.

Limitation(s)

Firstly, there were fewer number of controls and PCOS cases with Phenotype C and D besides younger age of study group. Secondly, the use of conventional chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay to measure testosterone level in women against recommended Liquid Chromatography with tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS). However, LC-MS is not easily available in India as well as expensive hence need a marker that can be tested easily and at the same time reasonably sensitive and specific.

Conclusion

The present investigation establishes serum DHT immunoassay is a sensitive, specific and simple test of hyperandrogenemia in PCOS and may be implemented in routine hospital laboratories. Elevated serum levels of DHT (>462 pg/mL) can be introduced as hyperandrogenemia marker for PCOS in North Indian patients. However, more studies with larger cohort, including controls are needed for the validation of this result.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of All India Institute of Medical Sciences and various hospitals of Delhi, India for referring patient. Authors also thank patients for their co-operation during the study.

References

1.
Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. New Eng J Med. 1995;333:853-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group, Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19:41-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Dumont A, Robin G, Catteau-Jonard S, Dewailly D. Role of anti-mullerian hormone in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: A review. Reprod Biol and Endocrin. 2015;13:137. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
National Institutes of Health. Evidence-based Methodology Workshop on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, December 3-5, 2012 Executive Summary. Available at: https://prevention.nih.gov /docs/programs/pcos/FinalReport.pdf.
5.
Dewailly D. Diagnostic criteria for PCOS: Is there a need for a rethink? Best Pract & Res Clin Obstet and Gynaecol. 2016;37:05-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Ramanand SJ, Ghongane BB, Ramanand JB, Patwardhan MH, Ghanghas RR, Jain SS. Clinical characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome in Indian women. Ind J Endocrin and Metab. 2013;17:138-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Azziz R, Woods KS, Reyna R, Key TJ, Knochenhauer ES, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2004;89:2745-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Barth HJ, Yasmin E, Balen AH. The diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: The criteria are insufficiently robust for clinical research. Clin Endocrin (Oxf). 2007;67:811-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Rosner W, Auchus RJ, Azziz R, Sluss PM, Raff H. Position statement: Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: An Endocrine Society position statement. J Clin Endocrin Metab. 2007;92:405-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
O’Reilly MW, Taylor AE, Crabtree NJ, Hughes BA, Capper F, Crowley RK, et al. Hyperandrogenemia predicts metabolic phenotype in polycystic ovary syndrome: The utility of serum androstenedione. J Clin Endocrin Metab. 2014;99:1027-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Jakimiuk AJ, Weitsman SR, Magoffin DA. 5alpha-reductase activity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:2414-18. [crossref]
12.
Marchetti PM, Barth JH. Clinical biochemistry of dihydrotestosterone. Ann Clin Biochem. 2013;50:95-107. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Swerdloff RS, Dudley RE, Page ST, Wang C, Salameh WA. Dihydrotestosterone: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Clinical Implications of Elevated Blood Levels. Endocr Rev. 2017;38:220-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Ferriman D, Gallwey JD. Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. J Clin Endocr Metab. 1961;21:1440-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Fauser BC, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW, Legro RS, Balen AH, Lobo R, et al. Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): The Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:28-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Zhang HY, Guo CX, Zhu FF, Qu PP, Lin WJ, Xiong J. Clinical characteristics, metabolic features, and phenotype of Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A large-scale case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:525-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Allahbadia GN, Merchant R. Polycystic ovary syndrome and impact on health. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2011;16:19-37. [crossref]
18.
Pinola P, Piltonen TT, Puurunen J, Vanky E, Sundström-Poromaa I, Stener-Victorin E, et al. Androgen profile through life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A nordic multicenter collaboration study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:3400-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Bui HN, Sluss PM, Hayes FJ, Blincko S, Knol DL, Blankenstein MA, et al. Testosterone, free testosterone, and free androgen index in women: Reference intervals, biological variation, and diagnostic value in polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;450:227-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Eden JA, Place J, Carter GD, Jones J, Alaghband-Zadeh J, Pawson M. Elevated free androgen index as an indicator of polycystic ovaries in oligomenorrhoea without obesity or hirsute. Ann Clin Biochem. 1988;25:346-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Azzouni F, Godoy A, Li Y, Mohler J. The 5 alpha-reductase isozyme family: A review of basic biology and their role in human diseases. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:530121. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Azziz R, Carmina E, Sawaya ME. Idiopathic hirsutism. Endcr Rev. 2000;21:347-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Rosenfield RL. Clinical practice. Hirsutism. New Eng J Med. 2005;353:2578-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Hahn S, Kuehnel W, Tan S, Kramer K, Schmidt M, Roesler S, et al. Diagnostic value of calculated testosterone indices in the assessment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:202-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Zhou Z, Li R, Qiao J. Androgen profile in Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome in their reproductive years. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:331-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Nadaraja RND, Sthaneshwar P, Razali N. Establishing the cut-off values of androgen markers in the assessment of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Malay J Path. 2018;40:33-39.
27.
Fassnacht M, Schlenz N, Schneider SB, Wudy SA, Allolio B, Arlt W. Beyond adrenal and ovarian androgen generation: increased peripheral 5 alpha-reductase activity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrin Metab. 2003;88:2760-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Marti N, Galván, JA, Pandey AV, Trippel M, Tapia C, Müller M, et al. Genes and proteins of the alternative steroid backdoor pathway for dihydrotestosterone synthesis are expressed in the human ovary and seem enhanced in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrin. 2017;441:116-23. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51169.15962

Date of Submission: Jul 01, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 26, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 11, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: Funded by Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi,
India through research project (EEQ/2017/000214)
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 03, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 6, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 10, 2021 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com