Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 22441

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : QC15 - QC18 Full Version

Acute Renal Failure in Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51662.15964
Soumya Suguna Tripathy, Ranjita Ghadei, Swayamsiddha Mohanty, Tusar Mahapatra, Krushnapriya Behera

1. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.C.B, M.C.H, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.C.B, M.C.H, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.C.B, M.C.H, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.C.B, M.C.H, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 5. Postgraduate, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.C.B, M.C.H, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ranjita Ghadei,
Kalyani Nagar, Cuttack-753013, Odisha, India.
E-mail: drranjita_1971@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy related acute renal failure is a common occurrence and is associated with substantial maternal morbidity and mortality in developing countries. It may comprise up to 25% of the referrals to dialysis centres in developing countries. Acute kidney injury in pregnancy bears a high risk of bilateral renal cortical necrosis and resultant chronic renal failure. Acute renal failure in pregnancy follows bimodal relation to period of gestation. First peak is seen in early pregnancy between 7-16 weeks of gestation and second peak occurs in later part of pregnancy and puerperium. The incidence and aetiology are changing over time. Socio-economic and environmental factors are accountable for a regional difference in incidence, aetiology and outcome also.

Aim: To analyse the current aetiological factors, clinical spectrum of presentation of Acute Renal Failure (ARF) in pregnancy and to assess its maternal and foetal outcome.

Materials and Methods: It was a prospective cohort study of 100 patients presenting with acute renal failure during pregnancy and puerperium which was done at SCB Medical College, Odisha, India. Inclusion criteria were previously healthy pregnant females with sudden oliguria anuria, sudden increase in serum creatinine to more than 1.5 mg/dL or increase in serum creatinine of more than 0.5 mg/dL per day from base line if haemodialysis was indicated. Maternal outcomes were recovery with conservative treatment, dialysis, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and maternal death. Foetal outcomes were gestational age at delivery, birth weight, stillbirth or perinatal death. All these were recorded.

Results: During the first trimester of gestation acute renal failure developed most often due to septic abortion (3%). Preeclampsia was the most common cause of acute renal failure (50%) in late third trimester and postpartum periods followed by puerperal sepsis (9%), abruptio placentae (3%), and Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) (5%). Oedema and oliguria were the most common presentation in 81% and 30% of cases. A 87% with i.v. fluids and diuretics (conservative management), 13% required dialysis, 23% required blood and Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP), 30% needed ICU admission and 11% died during treatment. Foetal outcome were measured in terms of foetal growth restriction (24%), preterm delivery (14%), foetal distress (13%), Special Newborn Care Units (SNCU) admission (23%) and stillbirth (5%).

Conclusion: This study concludes that pregnancy related acute renal failure is associated with serious prognosis both for the mother and child. Even though, good obstetric care can reduce morbidity and mortality associated with it, these patients require special and intensive care management facility which can bring them better survival rates.

Keywords

Abruptio placentae, Acute kidney injury, Co-morbidity, Preeclampsia

Acute renal failure is a syndrome characterised by a rapid decline in the glomerular filtration rate and retention of nitrogenous waste products such as blood urea nitrogen and creatinine. Pregnancy related acute renal failure, although a preventable condition is a challenging problem both to the obstetrician and the nephrologist. There is an overall marked decline in the prevalence of pregnancy related acute renal failure over the past 50 years in the developed countries as a result of improved antenatal care and obstetric practices (1). However, the incidence has increased almost three times in the recent decade in the United States, from 0.04% in 2006 to 0.12% in 2015 among hospitalised patients, because of older maternal age with more co-morbidities, higher detection rates of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), increase in the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and increase in obesity rates (2). In contrast, it is still relatively common in the developing countries, though the overall incidence has fallen from 15% in the 1980s to 1.5% in the 2010s among hospitalised women (2).

The important causes of obstetrical acute renal failure are divided into those in early pregnancy, usually between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation in association with septic abortion, in late pregnancy and immediate puerperium, namely eclampsia, preeclampsia, antepartum haemorrhage (abruptio placentae), Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets (HEELP) syndrome, Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH), puerperal sepsis and Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome (HUS). Socioeconomic and environmental factors are accountable for huge difference in the incidence, causes and outcome of Pregnancy Related Acute Kidney Injury (PRAKI) in developed countries compared with the developing countries. Incidence and aetiology is also changing over time. Therefore, present study was conducted with an aim to determine the present epidemiology of PRAKI in our region.

Material and Methods

It was a prospective cohort study of 100 patients with acute renal failure who were followed-up to discharge from hospital or death in hospital. IEC approval was obtained (328). The study was done over two years from September 2018 to September 2020. All pregnant women who were admitted in emergency unit of SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India, with acute renal failure, or developed acute renal failure after admission, after fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated by the formula n=z2pq/d2 (z=1.96, p=4.5% and d=5%) ‘P’ was taken from a previous study (3). n=z2pq/d2=(1.96)2*0.045*0.955/(0.05)2=66.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria were previously healthy pregnant females with sudden oliguria (urine output <300 mL over 24 hours), or anuria with sudden increase in serum creatinine to more than 1.5 mg/dL or increase in serum creatinine of more than 0.5 mg/dL per day from base line. Exclusion criteria were evidence of renal disease prior to pregnancy, history of hypertension or diabetes before gestation, history of renal stone disease, renal scarring on ultrasonography, small size of the kidneys, elevated serum creatinine prior to gestation.

Study Procedure

After written consent was obtained from patients, data regarding demographic characteristics, detailed history, clinical presentation and laboratory investigations i.e., renal function tests, serum electrolytes, liver function tests when required, complete blood count, complete obstetric examination, mode of delivery, need for blood transfusion and surgical intervention were collected. Outcome was considered favourable if patient made a complete recovery, if patient required no dialysis, had good urine output and normal renal function. Patients with improved, but abnormal renal function who did not require dialysis were considered to have partial recovery. Progression to either chronic kidney disease or mortality was considered as an unfavourable outcome.

Statistical Analysis

All the data were entered in the Microsoft Excel 2007 software and analysed in Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24 (IBM Inc. Chicago). The categorical variables were expressed in terms of number and percentages. All the continuous variables were expressed in terms of mean and standard deviation.

Results

Mean age of the study participants was 25.83±4.27 years with a minimum age of 18 years to a maximum age of 42 years. Mean gestational age of the study participants was 36±4.03 weeks with a minimum of 14 weeks to a maximum of 40 weeks.

Out of the total study population 81% belonged to 21-30 years of age. Only 2% are of more than 35 years of age (Table/Fig 1).

Most of the study population (61%) were primipara and 14% had history of abortion (Table/Fig 2).

Majority of the participants had antepartum eclampsia (50%). Among those with antepartum eclampsia, 29% had antepartum eclampsia in latent labour, 9% had antepartum haemorrhage eclampsia in prelabour and 2% had antepartum eclampsia in preterm labour and rest (10%) were not in labour or prelabour (Table/Fig 3).

Clinical features among the study participants revealed that oliguria was seen in 30% of the patients while anuria was seen in 11% (Table/Fig 4). Mean systolic blood pressure was 156.18±28.60 mm of Hg with a minimum of 70 to a maximum of 200 mmHg. Similarly, mean diastolic blood pressure was 100.36±18.92 mmHg with a minimum of 50 to a maximum of 130 mmHg.

Mean haemoglobin level was low at 8.52±1.63 gm/dL. Serum urea and creatinine at the time of admission and the peak values were higher (Table/Fig 5).

Out of those in whom conservative management (IV fluids with input output monitoring, diuretics and treatment of the cause) was done, 82 (94.2%) were discharged after recovery. However, 5 (5.74%) died after conservative management. Main management was fluid restriction with strict input and output monitoring and diuretics. Abnormality in serum electrolytes was corrected. Moderate to severe anemia correction was done by blood transfusion. Those with hypertension were given antihypertensives. In cases of deranged coagulation profile, Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) was given. Daily serum renal function tests were sent for evaluation of progress. Patients that had anuria or oliguria benefitted from fluid management.

Renal replacement therapy was required in 13% cases. All required intensive care management. The patients selected for renal replacement therapy, based on consultation with the nephrologist, were those in whom serum urea and creatinine increased despite conservative management. Of those taken up for renal replacement therapy, 7 (53.84%) recovered successfully and were discharged. However, a significant number of patients, 6 (46.16%) died during the course of treatment (Table/Fig 6).

Preterm birth seen in 14% of the newborns was iatrogenic. Foetal distress was noticed in 13% of the newborns, 23% required SNCU admission and 62% had an Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration (APGAR) score of more than 7. Mean weight of the newborn was 2.51±0.83 kg with a minimum of 0.1 kg to a maximum of 3.8 kg (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The minimum age in the present study was 18 years, with the maximum of 42 years, which is comparable to the studies of Lufullah A et al., Goplani KR et al., and Prakash J et al., (4),(5),(6). The comparison between mean age of participants in the present study with several other studies is shown in (Table/Fig 8) (5),(6).

Regarding the parity in the present series, it was found that 31% of the cases were primigravida and 69% cases are multiparous (Table/Fig 9) (6),(7).

In this present study, mean gestational age of the study participants was 36±4.03 weeks with a minimum of 14 weeks, to a maximum of 40 weeks, which is in contrast to that reported by Goplani KR et al., where 14 (20%) patients were in early pregnancy, 5 (7.14%) were in late pregnancy and 72.85% were in the puerperium (5). The discrepancy is possibly due to eclampsia and preeclampsia being the main causative factor in the present study in contrast to the study of Goplani KR et al., where puerperal sepsis was the main cause (5).

In the present study, preeclampsia and eclampsia was detected to be the leading cause of pregnancy related acute renal failure. Majority of the participants had antepartum eclampsia (50%), followed by preeclampsia seen in 16% of the participants. This finding is similar to the study by Prakash J et al., which reported preeclampsia and eclampsia to be the most common cause of pregnancy related acute renal failure, contributing to 35.29% of the cases (6).

In the present study, 3% cases had septic abortion as an aetiological factor, which is in contrast to the reports by Goplani KR et al., who found it to be one of the major causes of AKI in 20% of the patients and Chaudhri N et al., in 5.8% cases (5),(7). The cause for this discrepancy may be due to the increasing adoption of family planning services and use of safer abortion measures. In the present study, puerperal sepsis accounted for only 9% of the cases of pregnancy related acute renal failure, whereas Goplani KR et al., and Kumar KS et al., reported puerperal sepsis as the most common aetiological factor (39% and 61%, respectively) leading to acute renal failure in pregnancy (5),(8). Ansari MR et al., reported antepartum and PPH as the leading causes, in 50% and 38% cases, respectively; whereas in the present study, ante partum haemorrhage and PPH was present in 3% and 5% of cases only (1). Thus, it is obvious from the present study that the trend of pregnancy related acute renal failure is shifting from first trimester towards the third trimester and third trimester complications such as preeclampsia and eclampsia have replaced sepsis and haemorrhage as the leading cause.

In this present study, the presenting clinical feature generalised oedema was found in 81% cases, hypertension in 76% cases, pain abdomen in 67% cases, convulsion in 54% cases, oliguria in 30% cases, fever in 14% cases, unconsciousness in 20% cases, bleeding per vaginum in 12% cases, foul smelling vaginal discharge in 11% cases, anuria in 11% cases and jaundice was seen in 10% cases at the time of presentation. All these clinical features were present in different combinations. The mean serum creatinine and the mean serum urea level at the time of admission in the present study were 3.60 mg/dL with SD 1.58 and 102.98 mg/dL with SD 41.48, respectively. The peak serum urea during the course of treatment was 109.06 mg/dL and peak serum creatinine was 3.76 mg/dL, which was lower than the finding of Prakash J et al., (6).

The treatment modalities were conservative management in 87% cases and dialysis was required in 13% cases. This is in contrast to the study of Prakash J et al., in which haemodialysis was required in 54.6% and conservative treatment was given in 45.2% and Goplani KR et al., in which haemodialysis was required in 97.14% cases (5),(6). Around one-third (30%) of the patients required intensive care admission. Maternal death was seen in 11% of the patients. The recovery rate and survival in the present study was 89%, which is greater in comparison to the report of Ansari MR et al., where 26% developed irreversible renal failure and complete recovery was observed in 55% patients only (1). Similar report was given by Prakash J et al., who gave a recovery rate of 69.7% (6). The most severe form of acute renal failure was found to develop in the following conditions: equally attributed to severe preeclampsia and eclampsia leading to 27.2% mortality, puerperal sepsis (27.2%) and HELLP syndrome (27.2%), followed by primary PPH (18.1%).

Foetal mortality was observed in 5% cases, which is in contrast to observations given by Randeree IG et al., who reported foetal mortality in 55% and majority of deaths occurred in early gestation (9). A recent review in 2017 showed that there were 123 stillbirth/perinatal deaths of the 412 pregnancies with acute renal failure (29.8%) (10),(11).

Limitation(s)

We took non probability sampling and bias could not be avoidable.

Conclusion

This study concludes that pregnancy related acute renal failure is still a significant occurrence. It is associated with serious prognosis for the mother and the child. The number of cases of acute renal failure due to septic abortion, antepartum haemorrhage and PPH in this study is relatively less, probably reflecting safe abortion procedures and better blood transfusion facility. The alarming increase in the prevalence of severe preeclampsia and eclampsia as a cause of acute renal failure during pregnancy, calls for early recognition of high risk groups, prevention of the severity of hypertension, and effective management. Even though, good obstetric care can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with acute renal failure, intensive care management facility is needed.

References

1.
Ansari MR, Laghari MS, Solangi KB. Acute renal failure in pregnancy: One year observational study at Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58(2);61-64. PMID:18333521.
2.
Kilari S, Chinta R, Vishnubhotla S. Pregnancy related acute renal failure. 2006. [online] Jogi.co.in. Available at: < https://www.jogi.co.in/july_august_2006/05_oao_pregnancy_related_acute_renal_failure.html >.
3.
Abolfaz A, Hoda D, Leila S, Babak HZ. Acute renal failure during the pregnancy: A review on pathophysiology risk factors and management. Journal of Renal Injury Prevention. 2018;7(4):314-20. [crossref]
4.
Lufullah A, Gezginc K, Tonbul HZ. Aetiology and prognosis in 36 acute renal failure cases related to pregnancy in central Anatolia. Eur J Gen Med. 2005;2:110-13. [crossref]
5.
Goplani KR, Shah PR, Gera DN, Gumber M, Dabhi M, Feroz A, et al. Pregnancy-related acute renal failure: A single-center experience. Indian J Nephrol. 2008;18:17-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Prakash J, Niwas SS, Parekh A, Pandey L, Sharatchandra L, Arora P, et al. Acute kidney injury in late pregnancy in developing countries. Informa Health Care. 2009;309-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Chaudhri N, But G, Masroor I, Qureshi MA, Shehzad MN, Abbasi MSR, et al. Spectrum and short term outcome of pregnancy related acute renal failure among women. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci. 2011;7(2):57-61.
8.
Kumar KS, Krishna CR, Siva Kumar V. Pregnancy related acute renal failure. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56:308-10.
9.
Randeree IG, Czarnocki A, Moodley J, Seedat YK, Naiker IP. Acute renal failure in pregnancy in South Africa. Ren Fail. 1995;17:147-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Liu Y, Ma X, Zheng J, Liu X, Yan T. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):235. Doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1402-9. PMID: 28720086; PMCID: PMC5516395. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Taber-Hight E, Shah S. Acute kidney injury in pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2020;27(6):455-60. Doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2020.06.002. PMID: 33328061; PMCID: PMC7751749. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51662.15964

Date of Submission: Jul 30, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 08, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jan 19, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 31, 2021
• Manual Googling: Oct 07, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jan 19, 2022 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com